RADIO

Leftist ESG policies are DESTROYING oil & gas ON PURPOSE

JP Morgan now predicts the U.S. average price for gasoline this summer will be $6.00 a gallon. Last May, the average was just over THREE. We are in real, serious trouble Glenn says…especially since it seems our current oil & gas catastrophe is BY DESIGN by far-left politicians pushing ESG into ever sector of our free market (it’s could hit electricity hard this summer, too). Glenn explains why leftists may be doing this ON PURPOSE, and what our nation could look like just 12 months from now: ‘You NEED to prepare.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. Let's -- let's just talk about gas. How much are you paying for gas right now?

If you lived in California, you are now paying $6 a gallon for gasoline. And we're not in the summer yet. I wonder how much we're going to save on this year's Fourth of July picnic. Because remember, I think it was last year, they told us that we saved 9 cents. Oh, man, it's going to be sweet. Anyway, $6 a gallon in California. That was hit on Tuesday. The national average price of gas now, is a record $4.57 per gallon. That's the national average. Just to remind you, the national average, last May, was $3.04. This has nothing to do -- nothing to do with Russia. This has everything to do with ESG.

And what I -- I want to express to you, and ask you to do, is start looking at things differently. We need to look at things a little bit more like the Chinese. And I'm not saying look at things 100 years down the road. Can we just look 52 months ahead?

We need to look, just a few years in advance. Twelve months, would be great. Can we look 12 months in the future?

Right now, JP Morgan is saying, the average price for gasoline this summer, will be $6 a gallon.

That would mean California will be eight or $9 a gallon.

Now, I don't know what that puts fuel at, in our trucks. Diesel. But we are in real, serious trouble.

ESG has choked off all the money. The more executives I talk to, at -- in the gas and oil industry, they're all saying, the same thing.

Glenn, they can open up all the leases they want. They -- they have closed down the leases. They've closed down pipelines. But that's not the real problem.

The real problem is ESG. If you don't know what ESG is. I beg you. Please, get the book, The Great Reset.

It explains all of this. I -- it's breathtaking, at how fast this is come down now.

ESG has choked off all of the investment. What was it? $48 billion, just last year, invested by these hedge funds, in the oil industry.

This year, I think it's 9 billion. What caused that?

With energy being as important as it is, think about this as a free market. When there's great demand, and really high prices, what does the market do?

The market starts to invest in, holy cow, we can clean up, right now. By getting into that market. And start to sell oil and gas. We can sell it all over the world.

Why has our investment gone down? Our investment has gone down, because our banks, our hedge funds. And everybody else, is now starting to say, yeah. That's not the way of the future. We're going to do wind and solar.

Okay. All right. Sure. Sounds great. Enjoy the wind and solar this summer, when you're paying $6 a gallon for gasoline. And God only knows, how much you're going to pay for meat and potatoes.

Because our meat and potatoes, well, they start with a farmer. And the farmer has a tractor. And that tractor runs on diesel fuel.

And he has to first spread fertilizer. Which comes from petroleum. But you can't make fertilizer.

So we don't have fertilizer. Well, that will save in the tractor. You know, he won't be putting that diesel fuel in. No. No.

He'll plant less of what he was planning on planting.

Then he has to put fuel into the tractor, to make sure that it's harvested. Bailed. You'll need trucks to move it from his farm to the processing plant. The processing plant needs energy to run it. And then they'll put it on a truck. And then it goes to the grocery store. And then you use your car, to go buy it at the grocery store, and then bring it home in your car. When no one has any fuel, the prices will -- to quote Barack Obama, necessarily go up.

Right now, the diesel price, just so you remember, everything shipped to America, is on a giant ship. And that's not run by fairy dust. Or solar panels. In fact, I don't know anyone who is working on solar panels, for the cargo ships.

I don't know anyone, who has in their design, wind-powered cargo ships.

I mean, I suppose we could pull the Nina and the Pinta. The Santa Maria was out of commission. But can we find those two? Because those were wind-powered ships. That's diesel fuel, our trains. Diesel fuel brought in from China to a port. The trucks, then moved them, and all of the heavy machinery. The forklifts and everything run on diesel. That all is shipped and put on to a train. Shipped some place in the middle of the country, or wherever is closest to you. And then a truck picks it up, and brings it to the grocery store. Twelve times a day. Here's what I need you to understand: We have not even begun yet. Because of ESG and because of the policies of this administration, they are creating a national emergency. Our farmers are not going to be able to have the fuel. There's a story right now, in Breitbart. Diesel price surge has New England fishing industry, reeling. They were paying a dollar 50 for a gallon of diesel, back in 2019. A dollar 50. They're now paying $6.50. And here's the thing: When these giant corporations buy fish, they don't buy it at today's market price.

They buy in -- in boatloads, literally, they buy them in bulk. And so the fishing industry, makes a contract, with that food plant, or grocery store. Or whoever is buying it. If it's bought in bulk. And they say, you know what, because you're buying so much. We're going to charge you this amount. And you sign a contract.

Now, if the price of fish and everything goes down, the fishermen win.

If it goes up, the stores win. But there comes a point, when fishermen, can't fish anymore. This is what we're headed towards. And don't think short-term on this. To put oil rigs into a field, and to open those up, is about a five-year process, from turning it on, to actually getting it to your gas station.

It will take about five years. If it's on federal land. Because the federal government is screwed up, it takes about ten years.

So any fix that we have, right now, is five years away.

Now, let me give you this from the Washington Examiner today.

By the way, none of this is what you're going to hear in the New York Times. You will not hear any of this on CNN.

Half of our country has no idea, what's about to hit them. Do not listen to your friends, who are reading the corporate media garbage.

Electricity customers across the country, according to the Washington Examiner. They say heightened risk of power outages, this summer.

Regulators say, it reflects a worsening outlook for the grid. Which is simultaneously struggling through extreme weather conditions, and a shift away from traditional energy sources.

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation, or NERC, the regulatory body that oversees our grid operations across the United States and Canada, warned in its summer reliability assessment, published yesterday.

Listen. That the entire West and most of the Midwest face at least an elevated risk of seeing insufficient electricity supply, where slim reserve margins, run up against high demand. For the sections of the grid, stretching from Wisconsin to the Gulf Coast and to California, they have been deemed at risk for insufficient operating reserves. To be high, during peak demand conditions.

Expected resources, according to the officials, expected resources do not meet operating reserve requirements under normal peak demand, and outage scenarios.

Now, they're saying, that utilities may have to shut off power to customers, in peak demand. You know, cold weather kills a lot of people. So does hot weather.

I don't know if you've noticed, but, boy, in the old timey times, everybody seemed to live up north.

Why? Have you been to Texas in the summer? Have you been to Atlanta? Have you been -- God forbid to Phoenix? It's hell! You don't have -- you don't have any energy. First of all, good luck pumping that water. Second of all, you don't have electricity. Good luck with no air-conditioning! I'm dead within a week. Oh.

So here's the thing: I want you to listen to why they say, this is happening. The grid operators have been forward in their assessment of capacity shortages, and their causes. In a report released just last January, it -- it placed responsibility for the reliability shortcomings on the transformation of its generating resources, including the requirements of always on generating units, such as coal-fired plants. It also listed older coal plants. And wind and solar resources, that are not always available. To provide energy, during times of need.

What?

Why don't the solar panels work at night? I never thought of that. What happens to those wind -- that wind power, when the wind doesn't blow.

Getting the balance right, between traditional thermal sources, and their retirements, especially coal. Why are these coal-fired plants retiring?

Because they're being forced to. Why?

ESG. Some of the thermal plants and coal and natural gas, have been retiring. With new resources coming on in the way of wind and solar resources.

But maintaining the right mix of resources, so you can reliably provide power, over a range of conditions, is kind of where we should focus. Say experts.

Oh. This hour, I'm going to show you, this is not a bug in the system. This is a feature. I'm going to show you here in the next few minutes, and we're going to use baby food as an example, we are headed towards national emergencies. When you have national emergencies, all kinds of fun things, like we experienced in covid, can happen.

You need to prepare. And you need to stop listening to anyone who is not listening for the actual facts. A lot of this stuff, we're dealing with, you can just point to it, and go, look, it's happening there, there, and there. Why?

The why, you can leave that up to politics. I mean, I think that's pretty clear. But whatever. The rest of it is math.

You take this out, and replace it with a solar panel. You're in trouble. You take all of the oil, and you say, no more from Russia, and then you say, no more from America.

And then, you have supply problems. Here's an idea. You're going to run out of fuel. It's math.

Don't listen to people who are talking about feelings. Talk math. If this country even understands, that two plus two still does equal four.

RADIO

The Glenn Beck Program Honors Charlie Kirk

Join Glenn as he goes live to honor the memory of Charlie Kirk. A time of prayer, grieving, and remembrance for a husband, father, and patriot.

RADIO

Glenn joins Megyn Kelly live to discuss Charlie Kirk shooting

Covering the breaking news of Charlie Kirk at shot at Turning Point USA event.

RADIO

Please pray for my friend Charlie.

Please pray for Charlie Kirk.

Please pray for our Republic.

RADIO

Gen Z's surprising support for Trump and socialist policies revealed in new poll

A shocking number of young Americans support BOTH President Trump and democratic socialism, a new poll has found, and they're willing to make major changes to the American system to get what they feel they deserve. Justin Haskins, who conducted the poll with Rasmussen, joins Glenn Beck to break down the unexpected findings…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins. He's the president of our republic. StoppingSocialism.com. He's editor-in-chief. And also the coauthor of several books, with me. Welcome to the program, Justin.

How are you?

JUSTIN: I'm doing well, Glenn. How are you?

STU: Well, I was well, until you contacted me on vacation, and sent me this disturbing poll.

I am in bed at night.

And I'm reading this. I'm like, oh, dear.

What? My wife is like, I told you to not check this email. I'm like, I didn't know Justin was going to write to me.

Justin, tell me, first of all, before we get into it, how secure is the sample size on this poll?

JUSTIN: It's a very good sample size. 1200 people nationally.

Only 18 to 39-year-olds. And we did that deliberately, so that we could get a sample size large enough so we could pull out valid responses, just from younger people.

So the whole purpose of this poll was to find out what younger people, 18 to 39 think, voters only. And people who say that they're likely to vote. So we're not talking about just people out in the public. We're not talking about registered voters.

We're talking about people who are registered to vote. And say they're likely to vote.

GLENN: So let's go over some of the things that you have already released to the press.

And that is, in the survey, 18 to 39-year-olds, likely voters.

The Trump approval rating is a lot higher than you thought it would be. Right?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. Forty-eight percent positive approval rating of Donald Trump, which for young people, is very high.

So that's -- that's the good news.

That's the only good news we're going to talk about.

GLENN: We might have to come back to that first question several times.

Do you believe the United States is a fundamentally good, evil, or morally mixed country?

JUSTIN: Yep. This one is not too bad.

It's not great. But fundamentally good was 28 percent.

Which is low. But mixed was 50 percent.

And fundamentally evil was 17 percent.

And I think mixed at 50 percent is not an unreasonable, crazy response.

I -- I can see why all sorts of people might choose that.

So I don't think there's anything terrible here. It depends on what you mean by mixed. Fundamentally good at 28 percent. It's a little low. Fundamentally evil at 17 percent, it's a little disturbing. But it's not -- it's not insane. The insane stuff comes a little bit later.

GLENN: Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Major industries talk about the crazy stuff coming later, here it is.

Major industries like health care, energy, and big tech should be nationalized and give more control and equity to the people.

JUSTIN: Yeah. This was -- this was -- this one floored me. If I look at strongly agree. Somewhat agree for that statement you just read. It's over 70 percent of young people, including -- including the vast majority of Republicans. Young Republicans. And people who identify as conservatives.

It was pretty similar, in fact, how young people responded compared to liberals and independents.

And Democrats.

They all pretty much agreed that, yes. The government. The federal government should be nationalizing whole industries to make things more equitable for people.

GLENN: As the guy who is the chief -- editor-in-chief of stopping socialism. What's the problem with nationalizing energy, and health care?

JUSTIN: Well --

GLENN: What happens, typically.

JUSTIN: Well, usually, there's blood in the streets, when you do too much of that.

You know, socialism, communism have been spectacularly horrible, throughout the course of human history. Across every society, culture, religion.

It doesn't matter when or what kind of technological advancements you have. The more you collect vies a society. The more authoritarian that society gets. The less you have individual freedom. And the worst the economy usually is for regular people. So it's been a catastrophe across-the-board. Everyone listening to this audience, probably knows that.

And so the idea that you would have three-quarters of young voters. So remember, these people will be the primary voters in ten to 20 years.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: Saying, yeah. We should be nationalizing whole industries. Whole industries, is so disturbing.

And I don't think that conservatives are -- understand how deeply rooted some of these ideas are with younger people.

GLENN: No. No.

And I will tell you, I think some conservatives are walking a very dangerous line. And, you know, coming up with a little mix of everything.

And -- and I think we have to be very careful on -- on what is being said. And who are WHO our friends and allies are.

By the way, that number again is 39 percent strongly agree.

37 percent somewhat agree.

Somewhat disagree, 12 percent. Strongly disagree, 5 percent.

That is disastrous. Now, try this one on. These are the ones that have been -- we have new ones.

These are just a few of the ones that were released late last week. The next presidential election is in 2028. Would you like to see a democratic socialist candidate win the 2028 presidential election?

JUSTIN: Yep, 53 percent said yes.

Fifty-three percent of all voters said yes. And the most shocking thing, was that 35 percent of those who we poll, who said they voted for Donald Trump, in 2024, said that that they want to see a socialist win in 2028. And so about a third of Republicans, 35 percent of Trump voters, 43 percent of people who call themselves conservatives, so even on the right, among younger people. There is a large group that want a socialist president, in 2028.

GLENN: And the reason -- the reason is, it -- it tied into the next few questions. Okay.

So here's question five. Among the following options, which best describes your biggest reason, you would like to see a democratic socialist candidate. Thirty-one percent said housing costs are too high. Twelve percent, taxes are too low for corporations. Eleven percent, taxes are too low for wealthy have I seen.

Eight percent want single payer health care systems. Seventeen say the economy unfairly benefits older, wealthier Americans.

Fifteen percent say the economy unfairly benefits larger corporations. 5 percent, some other reason.

And 2 percent, unsure. Now, let's get into the new polls that were breaking today.

Question six.

How would you describe your current financial situation?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Only 24 percent said that they're doing well. Thirty-four -- 38 percent said getting by. Struggling 29 percent. Seven percent said in crisis. So if you add up just getting by, struggling, and in crisis, that's 74 percent said that they're just barely getting by, at best.

And I think that explains a lot of the other negative responses we've seen so far.

GLENN: That's not good.

JUSTIN: In this poll. And the ones that are going to come pretty soon here.

GLENN: Seven. Which best describes your personal life situation?

You are thriving, you're doing well with a few ups and downs. You feel stuck and uncertain. You feel lonely, disconnected, or emotionally drained. You're in a crisis and feel most negative about your personal life.

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. About a third said that they feel stuck or uncertain. Lonely. Or that they're in a crisis.

That's a third of young people. Say that.

I mean, that's -- that's not great. Only 19 percent said thriving.

46 percent said, they have ups and downs. Which I think is not. Too shocking.

But the idea that there's a third of American voters out there, who feel like, they can't buy a home. And they feel like they are lonely. And that they're in crisis. And that life is not just going well at all for them.

Again, I think that's -- that's driving a lot of the support for socialism. When you have 53 percent of these people saying, yeah. I want a socialist president in 2028.

GLENN: So socialism is not the answer. It is the symptom. It is the symptom of what people are feeling right now.

And they -- they don't know any other -- they don't -- nobody is presenting them with anything other than, you know, Republican/Democrat bullcrap. And socialists are coming at it from a completely nigh angle. Or so the youth think it's the oldest and most failed system of all time.

But they're seeing this as a solution that is different than what the party -- the Republican/Democrats are offering. Even though the Democrats are offering the socialism thing.

Number eight, do you think the American economy is unfair to young people?

Sixty-two percent say yes.

JUSTIN: Yeah, and 27 percent said no.
And I think that this really gets at the heart of what the issue is here.

When you look at the reasons. When you look at the detailed things of the poll.

What -- to try to find out if there's an association between some kind of demographic or response question about people's lives and their support for socialism, to see if there's a correlation there between something that is happening. And whether someone is a socialist or not.

One of the top correlations, connections, is, if people think the economy is unfair.

And if they're having trouble buying a home. Or they don't think they can buy a home. Or that's one of their reasons for supporting socialism.

So, in other words, there's this fairness issue. And it's not even about inequality.

It's not about, well, they have too much -- well, if they feel like the -- to use a Trump term. Rigged.

And throughout the data. That's what we see over and over and over again. Is lots of people say, the economy is rigged. For older people. For wealthier people, for corporations. It's rigged. And if they say, yeah. I think it's rigged, you know, then they're more likely to say, yeah. I want a socialist.

And I also think the same group has a relatively high approval rating of Donald Trump.

It's because the reason that a lot of young people like Trump in the poll, is that he's not part of the establishment.

And I think -- I don't think they -- I think a lot of young people who voted for Trump and who liked Trump, they didn't do it, because they liked free market, pro-liberty policies. And that's not a good thing.

But I don't think that's why they did it. I think a lot of them voted for Trump and supported him, because he's not the establishment. And that's what they don't like. They want to blow the establishment up.

JUSTIN: So my -- Justin, my sample size is my two young adults. My two children.

And they're like, talking to me, and saying, Dad. I will never be able to own a home, looking at the prices, looking at interest rates. They're like, I can't even afford to pay rent at an apartment. And they don't know what to do.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JASON: And so they're looking at -- on, like, TikTok. And they're like, who is this Mamdani guy? This sounds interesting. They bring this to me. They grew up listening to me indoctrinating them their entire lives. They're looking at other voices like on TikTok. Are we just not being loud enough?

GLENN: No. We're not -- we're not connecting with them. We're not -- I feel like they don't feel they're being heard.

And we are speaking to them in red, white and be blue.

And that means nothing. The Statue of Liberty means nothing to them. Ellis Island means nothing to them. The flag means nothing to them.

It's all partisan politics.

They're all symbols of really, the two parties.

You know, and an America, they don't relate to at all.

I think that's -- that's our biggest problem, and not being able to break through. To your point, question nine. How confident are you that you will own a home at some point, in the next ten years?

29 percent say, they already own a home. Which I found interesting. That's -- I think a pretty high number for somebody who is 18 to 34 years old.

JUSTIN: Thirty-nine.

GLENN: Thirty-nine.

JUSTIN: Yeah.

GLENN: There's a lot of 18 to 30. That I didn't own home when I was, you know, 30. Just got a home when I was 30. But go ahead. Go ahead with the rest of that poll.

JUSTIN: Yeah. So then 21 percent said discouraged, but somewhat hopeful. 12 percent said, not confident. 10 percent said, you are convinced you will never own a home. 3 percent not sure.

So if you add up the negative responses, it's around 43 percent that gave that response.

GLENN: Right. But, again, 29 percent, you already own a home. And 25 percent you are confident you will own a home, is still good. It just -- these -- these other numbers, have, you know, discouraged, but hopefully you will own a home. Who is discouraging that? And how is that being discouraged?

You know, only 12 -- let's see 12. Twenty-two. 25 percent are not sure they will ever own a home. That's too high of a number.

But I -- I don't think that's completely dismal. Now, a completely dismal answer, to the question, would you support a law that would confiscate America's excess wealth?

Including things like second homes. Luxury cars, and private boats, in order to help young people buy a home for the first time?

Are you for or against that? We'll give you that number here in just a second.

GLENN: There are some disturbing results, that get very disturbing, going from here on.

We've got two of these today, and then more tomorrow.

We'll spend more time with you tomorrow, Justin.

But would you support a law that would confiscate American's excess wealth, including things like second home, luxury cars, and private boats in order to help young people buy a home for the first time? Get the results.

JUSTIN: Yeah, 25 percent strongly support that, 30 percent somewhat support it, 55 percent in total for support. Only 38 percent strongly or somewhat oppose, with just 20 percent saying strongly oppose. So the vast majority now is -- is supporting this Communistic policy to confiscate people's wealth in order to help people. Younger people buy homes, which is in line with that question, we talked about earlier. Where it said, you know, three-quarters of these respondents wanted to nationalize whole industries to make things fairer. So it's all about -- it's all about this sense of unfairness that exists.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: And they feel like. Young people feel like the system is rigged. They feel like neither party is on their side, and they want to blow the whole thing up, by just taking wealth away from people, nationalizing whole industries, and redistributing it all.

And guess what, that's basically the democratic socialist platform. So it's not a surprise that that's -- that's becoming increasingly more popular with these young people.

And I don't think that free market, pro-liberty people are dealing with -- with this.

GLENN: No.

JUSTIN: In a real way.

In fact, I think a lot of us have believed recently that the wind is at our backs, and we're actually winning more and more young people over.
And that isn't what's happening according to the poll results.

GLENN: It explains why the Democrats have not moved their position off of the socialism stuff.

Doesn't it?

We keep saying, why? It's not working with anybody.

It is working. It is working with people under 39.

18 to 39-year-olds are hearing this message, and are embracing this message.