Every American should start writing a diary, or preserving the hard copies of things -- artifacts, news articles, objects bought from stores...because we ARE under attack. And incidences that may seem like isolated events (the skyrocketing federal debt, the loss of America's entrepreneurial spirit, COVID 19 lockdowns that destroy businesses, Black Lives Matter protests, and anti-Semitic movements) are not isolated at all. It's not a coincidence all these happened at once. And now, as seen in recent protests, BLM Marxists, anarchists, AND islamists (CAIR) are all working together. Our churches MUST wake up, because it's the only way we can fix this.
©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
RADIO
May 19, 2025
Ben & Jerry’s Ben Busted Protesting RFK Jr.
“Ben & Jerry’s” co-founder Ben Cohen was recently arrested while protesting Health & Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. during a congressional hearing. Oh the irony that the ice cream man is heckling the guy who’s trying to make America healthy! But even more ironic is he’s heckling someone who probably AGREES with him on many things! Glenn and Stu discuss why leftists have turned on fellow liberals like RFJ Jr. who have joined the Trump administration and whether conservatives should also keep an eye out.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: So Ben Cohen. Do you know who Ben Cohen is from Ben & Jerry's?
STU: Oh, yeah.
GLENN: Okay. He was removed yesterday from the hearing with Robert F. Kennedy about 15 minutes into the hearing.
You have it? Go ahead. Go ahead. There's that. The -- love that he's the face of ice cream. There he is.
VOICE: Members of the audience.
GLENN: And he is eventually removed. There he is. He's saying, Congress! Congress pays for bombs! Congress pays for bombs! They kill people.
VOICE: Members of the audience! Reminded, disruptions will not be permitted while the committee conducts its business. County police are asked to remove the individuals from the hearing room.
GLENN: That's -- I mean, let me have some ice cream right now. Let me get some of that. You know --
STU: So bizarre.
GLENN: So bizarre.
STU: And he's protesting RFK Jr. Who would be completely aligned with him, I think on this issue.
GLENN: Yes. On that issue. On a lot of issues. You know what, they just took some things out, because RFK is forcing them to take it out of their ice cream.
Ben & Jerry's stuff in their ice cream, that's not healthy for you according to RFK. That's -- I mean, that's amazing.
STU: Ice cream, typically not seen as a healthy food.
GLENN: No. No. No.
STU: Generally speaking.
GLENN: But their rocky road Rockefeller. With just a little bit of petroleum in it. Might have been a little bit too much. Might have been too much.
STU: You know, then you can choose not to eat it.
That's a wonderful thing you can do.
It's just strange the alignments here.
GLENN: I know.
STU: Did I -- this may be a fever dream, honestly, at this point.
I'm out on a limb with this.
But did Ben and Jerry go on with Tucker recently?
Is this a thing that occurred? People are saying yes. It's amazing the conversations that are happening on there right now.
I mean, like, look, it's good that you should be able to talk to people.
I'm sure Tucker does not agree with most of what Ben believes of Ben & Jerry's.
GLENN: Was Ben and Jerry on?
STU: I think it was only Ben.
GLENN: That's like having the cat from Tom and Jerry.
I don't know which one was the cat. Which one was the mouse?
STU: I think Tom was the cat, and Jerry was the mouse. So you want to have both the cat and mouse at the same time?
GLENN: Yeah, they're a team really.
STU: We'll get with their movie department.
GLENN: All right. Thank you. Here's a text you might get from your current wireless provider, if they knew more about you, and they were being honest.
Hey. It's not you, it's me.
Actually, it is you. You believe in freedom.
You think the Constitution is like, I don't know.
Good. I think it's a little problematic.
I need customers who share my values. You know, who hate cops and stuff like that. And want to kill babies. Anyway, I think maybe we should break up. That's what your cell phone company. That's what they would write to you.
They would break up.
Okay. Instead of dumping you. You should be dumping them. It's them, not you.
Okay? Do you want your money to go to causes like Planned Parenthood?
Because if you're with Verizon, they give that.
Patriot Mobile is the only cell phone company that actually believes in what you believe. Faith, family, freedom.
They support the right causes. They use the same towers, and they will make it easy to switch. In fact, they're the only company that will give you -- the big guys can't do this. They'll give you access to both, you know, companies. So if you're like, no. I get better service with this company here. And better service. They will give you -- service with both. It's PatriotMobile.com/Beck. PatriotMobile.com/Beck. 972PATRIOT. Get a first month for free
STU: Go to GlennBeck.com. Get the free email news letter. All the stories we talk about on a daily basis. GlennBeck.com.
(OUT AT 10:29 AM)
GLENN: Right now, SCOTUS is listening to arguments on birthright citizenship. The focus really is on the judge's power to block policies nationwide. That's got to stop. That just has to stop. But we'll see what the Supreme Court has to say.
STU: That's really the focus too. It's really not about birthright citizenship. From what I'm understanding. It's more about injunctions.
GLENN: Yeah. And it will be very narrow, on the injunctions, I think.
STU: Really?
GLENN: Yeah. So we'll see. We'll see.
So welcome to the program. We're glad you're here. You know who is not here? Is Ben and Jerry.
STU: He's here in my heart. By that way, I mean the calcium buildup from all the heart disease I've seen from the company, over the years. Yeah. He's not here.
He was at that big hearing.
It's difficult to understand where anyone is anymore.
I feel like, this was easier back in the day.
Like, you can kind of -- heard Ben and Jerry, you knew, left. It was easy, right?
GLENN: Right. Right.
STU: Now --
GLENN: I miss the days when we could just put labels on people. It was easy.
STU: It was easy. It made things a little easier to keep track of.
You know, like some people would label anti-Semite, for example, on Ben and Jerry.
Over the years. That was a label that I thought was interesting.
You know, but it's -- he's now opposing RFK who, I mean --
GLENN: I think it's probably on Ben & Jerry's side on many things.
STU: On almost everything.
Right? There is some things RFK has obviously changed now, when it comes to the woke stuff.
Some of the censorship stuff.
Although, I think -- it could be wrong on this.
Ben might be one of those old school socialist types. That might even agree with us on some of the censorship stuff.
Maybe. Because part of the socialist movement in the United States, was kind of built on --
GLENN: Was.
STU: Right. Was built on the operation to the McCarthyism.
And so there was -- there's some ideological.
GLENN: Right. They were for that, when they were the ones being shut up.
Now that they're not the ones being told to shut up.
They are like, we have every right to tell you to shut up. Okay.
STU: Yeah. Let me ask you this though. Because he's also been embraced by some parts of the right.
And -- and, you know, like Tucker did an interview with him. That's not an embrace. You can talk to whoever you want to talk to. Right? There's nothing wrong with that. We've talked to people on the far, far left. Even much farther left, crazier than even Ben or Jerry over the years. I -- no problem with that.
As a journalist, you should do that. You know, Tucker talked to Vladimir Putin, right? So did Megan Kelly.
GLENN: Yeah, I would talk to America's biggest enemies.
STU: Yeah. How else do you know what held them up? You would ask tough questions. I'm sure Tucker did in the interview. But we are -- I've noticed this thing that we're doing.
And I'm a little concerned. Let me see if I can articulate this.
GLENN: Are you?
STU: Us on the right, the conservative side of the spectrum, find someone who has some crossover with us.
In some way. But is really a figure of the left. Okay?
And we kind of give -- saying, hey, come on over. We have got this thing. It's wonderful!
And then they sort of become part of the movement, and that's totally fine. Like, let me give you an example. Tulsi Gabbard.
I really like Tulsi Gabbard.
She's been on the show a bunch of times. She's in the administration right now. She's great. so this is not a criticism.
I'm glad Tulsi Gabbard has had this awakening over the years. I'm excited about that. But so she comes over. She's -- you know, she supported Bernie Sanders. Ran the Sander's campaign in Hawaii back in the day. Not that long ago.
But she's had a transition. She's come over, and obviously, in the Trump administration right now.
And so we look at that. And we say, hey. That's great. We brought someone from the left, over to our side.
And that's great, if that's what you're doing. If you're convincing someone on the left, to convert their ideas into something closer to your ideas.
That's a positive change. You're widening the tent in a way that we can all support.
But really, what Tulsi is doing, in the government right now, is she's being consistent with her old left-wing views on things like, you know, stopping wars and not -- you know, and being tough on intelligence issues in the government.
GLENN: Yeah. Because we woke up on that.
STU: Well, because we've changed.
GLENN: Right.
STU: And that's what I'm getting to here. What seems to be happening, is we're embracing things on the left. And it's not us changing their views into ours. It's us changing our views into theirs. And then embracing some of those people.
That's not necessarily bad if we were wrong the whole time. Right?
GLENN: Yeah, I don't think we were on the endless wars.
STU: Yeah. I mean, some of that I agree with. Right?
The phrasing of it, and maybe the -- the scope of it, maybe I'm not fully there. But generally speaking, I think, you know, we've definitely overstepped our bounds at times.
GLENN: A lot of times.
STU: Yeah.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: I don't think that's improper to say.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: But, again, I look at the way that Trump handles it. And it's different than what Tulsi's vision of this is.
GLENN: Oh, no.
STU: Trump is tough on Iran.
GLENN: I think Trump is Ronald Reagan. I'll pound you into the sand. I will turn your sand into glass. Don't screw with us. But then he's like, we're buddies right now. So you don't want to be buddies? We'll be buddies.
STU: For example, this: His Syria move, I think, is fascinating. And I think -- I think the right move. I'm not 100 percent sure.
GLENN: Me too. I'm not 100 percent on anything.
STU: But like, I think it's worth taking a stab on this.
It's a new regime. The guy used to be literally in al-Qaeda. Okay?
GLENN: I know.
STU: However, maybe he's changed.
I think the chances of it are low. But why not pull that lottery ticket?
Because the downside is what we already had.
So give a shot. Give the guy a handshake. Say, hey, we will drop these sanctions. We're going to give you a chance to not turn yourself into the old regime.
GLENN: I think that's --
STU: I think that's the right approach.
GLENN: Nobody is ever turned by lectures.
STU: Yeah. Or like opponent's lectures in particular.
GLENN: Right. You turn people through love and understanding. And giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Until they prove you wrong.
STU: It's a great point.
And I think it ties back to my previous. The way we started this conversation.
Which is, a lot of people in our movement, are being won over to previous left-wing positions by new friends. And that is not bad, in and of itself.
But we've done it a lot lately.
And I'm concerned.
GLENN: So because I changed. Not because of Tulsi.
STU: No. But the movement has changed.
GLENN: The reason I liked Tulsi at first. Was I like the fact, that she was willing to stand up to her own machine. And say, no. You guys are wrong.
You guys are going down this fascistic route.
And I won't go there with you. You are changing all the rules.
You are not who you said you were.
That's why I originally liked her. Because she would take on her own people.
And that takes courage. So it shows you something about her character. Then when you get to know her, you realize, oh, we might disagree on taxes and everything else. But she loves the country. She loves and reveres the Constitution of the United States.
STU: Yep.
GLENN: If I could get you on the Bill of Rights, we don't have any differences too big to not be able to bridge.
STU: And, again, I don't think Tulsi is a problem.
GLENN: No. I don't.
STU: That's not what I'm saying.
But, you know, you have -- let's -- Tulsi is in DNI. You have RFK Jr. HHS. It's a big one. You know, you look at the way RFK approaches -- I mean, he -- I mean, he is awfully close to someone who -- like a Michael Bloomberg on public health issues.
This is something we -- now, he was kind of a Republican in New York at one point.
Obviously, it was something that I know we oppose. The audience loudly opposes, when he was trying to control what you eat. I think there's some differences.
I'm not saying there aren't any.
But, you know, going after food companies. And changing the way -- that's a change for -- if that's what the right is. That is a change for the right.
We were always in favor of people making their own choices. And having companies being able to produce the products within some guidelines.
GLENN: Yeah. As long as they're not killing people.
STU: Right. There are guidelines. There are guardrails, of course, to all of this.
But generally speaking, ours were wide. The left's were small. And now we've taken, the guy who was the voice of the left's view on those. RFK Jr. and put him in charge of the right's view of it.
Is that a good thing?
Maybe it's great. Maybe he's been completely right this whole time, and we should have been approaching things that way.
GLENN: I think if our society was not getting sicker and sicker and sicker. Then --
STU: There's reasons for all of this stuff.
GLENN: Right.
STU: But we should notice those things.
You know, he's a really -- I think big example of that. Because that is -- it's a massive change to the way that we've -- we've done these things.
Another one is trade. Peter Navarro ran as a Democrat over and over and over and over again.
On these trade whys.
Now, Donald Trump has been consists with these ideas since the day he was in the public eye.
GLENN: There's nobody who has been more outspoken on antitrade, up until recently, than me. And you.
You're still outspoken on it.
I think -- I think we have to give it a shot.
Because we're behind the eight ball here.
GLENN: Yeah. I don't like the policy.
I don't agree.
But again. It's separate from whether each individual one of these is right.
There's a lot of these.
And over time, I think, you can knowledge.
It will add up to a completely different formula.
It might be the right thing for us to do.
But we should notice each one of these changes, I think.
GLENN: And I think you're right on that.
But isn't this the same as -- I mean, you're not the same guy I met 30 years ago.
STU: Totally, we all change.
GLENN: We all change. And that's good. And we should notice when we change. Because we learn from. Wait. Why did I just change?
Did I change for the right reasons? Did something happen to me?
Is somebody around me, changing this? You do -- we do have to pay attention to the change.
But I think change is good.
STU: It can be.
You know --
GLENN: If it's -- if it's well thought out.
If it is still built on principles.
And evolving understanding. Not of truth.
But how to get to the truth. Like, I -- for instance, the foreign war thing.
I just know, right now. What we've been doing is not working. It's not going to make the world safer. Ever. Ever. Ever.
It's not.
STU: Sometimes, it has. Obviously, in previous wars. But, yes. I --
GLENN: The meddling of everybody.
STU: You can't control everybody.
GLENN: It just won't work.
And it's making things worse.
Now, pulling all the way back, and saying, you know what, we don't -- you know, we don't want to be involved in the rest of the world.
That doesn't sound good to me.
STU: Yeah. That's what Trump is doing.
GLENN: Right. But it might be the right thing.
I just know -- I know for sure, what we had been doing, doesn't work.
And I really believed in what we were doing.
Well, I believed in what I thought we were doing.
You know what I mean?
STU: For sure.
GLENN: And so we have to make changes. And changes in almost everything.
And as long as it's logical.
As long as you have really thought things out. As long as you're not just conforming.
You know, the really scary thing is when people begin to conform, for any other reason, other than logic.
I've reasoned this out. I've asked critical questions.
And I am sorry, I would love more information that might change me out of this position.
But this is where I find myself at.
And even if I'm uncomfortable, I have to stand here. Because this is my current understanding of what's best.
You know, and as long as you keep an open mind. And you're constantly seeking to have a better understanding, of deeper truths.
Then I think -- I think you're fine.
But, you know, one of the things we're going to face, especially with AI.
All of a sudden, we're going to conform.
Because Google would give you page after page after page after page of different information.
ChatGPT gives you one answer. And you just assume it's right.
They don't give you anything --
STU: That's got to be a fascinating development in our society.
GLENN: And it's already there.
STU: Oh, it totally is.
GLENN: You Googled, and you had to look at different things and everything else.
This is one answer. And I know it's right, because it came from AI. Very dangerous.
RADIO
May 19, 2025
Comey’s “8647” Threat to Trump Unmasked
Former FBI Director James Comey has caused a controversy by posting a picture of seashells on a beach, arranged into the number “8647.” Many have interpreted the message as a threat against President Trump. But did Comey know that it could be interpreted as a call to “86,” or assassinate, the 47th president? Or is his claim believable that he had no idea “86” could mean something violent? Glenn started off his radio program by giving Comey the benefit of the doubt, but a comment from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made him change his mind: “I don’t give him a break.”
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Now, maybe we as babies can figure out 8647.
Now, I don't know, Stu, if you saw the James Comey tweets yesterday.
STU: Yes, I did. Well, I mean, when you say, his tweets. He took a picture of it.
A shell formation, that he found on the beach.
GLENN: He was just walking by.
STU: And shells in the sand.
GLENN: Unbelievable!
I mean, I'm sorry. But I'm not a baby with my little innocent eyes.
There's no evidence -- we should -- there's no way that that's -- that he just stumbled across that. And he was like, oh, this is a cool sea shell formation.
I don't really know what it means. It's political of something.
So I will put it up on Instagram.
STU: That's obviously not true.
GLENN: That's what he said!
STU: Well, it kind of played it off that way. He said, oh, look what I found. Like either he did it himself, which is the most likely.
GLENN: No, no, no. But he came back.
Can somebody find the response?
Because he came back later, and reposted on it. Said, yeah. I posted early a picture of some shells, I saw today on the beach walk, which I just assumed was a political message.
I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind.
So I took the post down.
So he's saying, I just stumbled across this.
I took a picture of it.
STU: Right.
GLENN: The baby was an actual formation.
I mean, he knows somebody did it.
But I knew it had to have some political meaning.
Do you post something that you know has some political meaning?
Without saying, does anybody know what this means?
I mean, you didn't even post it, and say that.
STU: It's a very bad idea. Particularly if you happen to be the former head of the FBI.
GLENN: FBI! So he doesn't know what 86 means.
STU: Okay. We should set that up.
You know, I could walk you through this, Glenn.
As a former proud veteran of Chili's, where 86 means like you don't want cheese on the burger. That normally comes with cheese.
You're like the burger, 86 cheese.
Meaning, you killed the cheese off the burger.
Now, it also could mean, remove the choose.
I don't know that it's --
GLENN: Right. It has several --
STU: Always violent.
GLENN: It has several meanings. Eighty-six the cheese.
Which means get rid of the cheese. But it also has roots, back during the bootleg time.
Now, I've heard this story.
I looked for it. I couldn't find it anywhere.
I heard this story from somebody who was a wandering historian of New York.
And I don't remember what place it is.
But it had -- it was a bootleg club.
And during problems. And it was on a block.
And the basement went the entire city block.
Okay?
And so it was bootlegs and gambling underneath. And the cops only knew about the front entrance.
And so they would say, 86 it!
It's the cops. Which meant, the address on the other side, was 86.
So it meant, use that door!
Get out. Use that door.
Don't go through the front door. Eighty-six. It's the cops.
STU: Interesting.
GLENN: Okay?
So get out. When the soda
GLENN: And that takes on a whole different meaning today, doesn't it?
Soda jerk used to mean people in the drugstores that would pull the fountain down. And it would be called a soda jerk, and they had their own lingo. They had shoot one, draw one. They had shoot one in red.
You should know this.
If you're going up to a soda jerk. Shoot one in red. What does that mean?
STU: I don't know.
GLENN: It means, give me the Coke, but I want cherry Coke.
Shoot one in red. Okay? So they would pull the soda, and they would pour cherry soda in.
So echo was a repeat order.
And 86 meant, we're all out of it. Okay?
So it's, get out. Vacate.
We're all out, or kill the cheese.
Okay? So those are the meanings. But if I'm on the beach and I say -- and I see 8647, and I'm the former FBI director. I'm like, what does -- I know what 47 means. What does 86 mean?
STU: Of course, Trump 47 of the United States.
GLENN: Of course it does.
STU: Now, adding on to this, you're not only the FBI director, former -- you're, of course, an opponent of the president, who has been pretty clear over the years.
Also, I don't know if anyone notices. That president has almost been killed multiple times recently.
GLENN: Right.
STU: Right. So there's an added thing where you have to be really careful around this particular person, who took a bullet on stage.
And almost got killed with his golf club. Right?
GLENN: I mean, look at how delicate we are today!
And the left used to be so -- on the Kennedys with Robert F. Kennedy. Robert F. Kennedy.
I mean, I don't know if there's, you know, somebody out trying to kill him. I just assume this is a Kennedy. All Kennedys, somebody is out there to kill them.
STU: It does seem that way.
GLENN: It does seem that way, but you would never say 86 RFK. You would never -- just because we're decent people, but when it comes to Donald Trump. And I'll bet you now, with RFK too, it wouldn't be bad to say 86 RFK, in some circles.
They would be fine with killing them.
STU: Well, first of all, yes.
It's probably true in some circles. There's an entire Hamas wing of the party.
GLENN: But I mean American. American, you know, leftist circles.
They don't care. Ends justify the means.
STU: They're awful people.
I will say, it's possible, that he didn't mean that in that way.
GLENN: No. It could have been get out of 47.
STU: I want him out of office.
I'm sure, it will be his defense. I mean, one of the other things that's the new left-wing past time.
GLENN: As you're talking, I just can't. I can't look at you now. Because I always see you as a baby.
STU: I have very innocent eyes.
GLENN: I just want to gobble your cheeks up.
STU: That's why I'm eating more.
Get those cheeks up nice and plump.
The new left-wing pastime on Twitter today and on social media is to search for all of the conservatives, that did tweet, 8646 at some point during the Biden presidency.
GLENN: They weren't the former FBI director!
STU: It's a very fair point.
That's why -- I've never seen 8647.
Never seen that.
STU: I haven't seen it either. Apparently, people didn't post it during that term.
GLENN: Okay. But who are they? Look, we all have the crazy person that lives on our street.
Growing up, oh, he's the crazy Jim down the street. Kids, stay away from crazy Jim.
We all had the neighbor who was like, you know what, and I'll tell you what else is happening right now, that nobody knows. And you're like, okay.
All right.
STU: There are some conservative influencers, that just didn't like Biden. That tweeted it.
Not wanting him dead, but wanting him -- probably removed from office.
GLENN: Removed.
STU: All that being said, none of them, as you point out, were people who were the former FBI director.
Number one. None of them also were talking about a president that had almost been assassinated multiple times recently.
Right?
I mean, those two areas, I think are a massive distinction. Particularly, the first one.
I mean, even if, you know, the -- the -- someone had tried to assassinate. God forbid, we hope that they never do.
Joe Biden. When he was in office.
And you tweeted that after -- I mean, it will be insensitive. And probably a really bad idea.
GLENN: Yes. And a waste of time.
Almost redundant.
STU: Yeah. Just wait --
GLENN: He's almost.
STU: Yeah. He is -- his health isn't particularly strong, as you know.
However, beyond that, being the director of the FBI, means that you are constantly processing a stream of threats against the executive.
GLENN: Yes. Yes.
STU: And the fact that you would be in there, thinking that's appropriate. Knowing that obviously what 86 could mean. It doesn't necessarily mean that. But it could mean that.
GLENN: Honestly, when I saw it. I didn't think he meant kill him. I thought he was saying, get him out. Get him out.
That's what 86 means to me.
So cancel him, whatever.
STU: Yeah.
GLENN: However, again, when you're the FBI. Former FBI director. You have a little more responsibility.
STU: It's massively irresponsible. And he should just come out and apologize for it.
GLENN: And not saying I randomly saw these shells. They washed up on the beach like that. I guess. I don't know who did it. And I thought it might be political, so I posted it.
Nobody believes that!
STU: Yeah, another thing is, if you're the former FBI director, maybe never post anything on social media.
I don't know. Do something that is supposed to be important.
I just don't understand people with this nonsense.
GLENN: When we come back. I want to tell you, Kash Patel's take on this.
And when he tweeted that, in just a second. First, Lear Capital. When you go back to 2008 and buy gold, would you? Of course you would. Of course you would.
A lot of people would. Back then, gold was over a thousand dollars an ounce. Then the meltdown came. The bailouts. The trillions in debt. And the gold, it nearly tripled in value.
Everyone has hindsight. A lot of times, it's 2020. But the question is: Do you have any foresight?
Look around, the debt is worse! The dollar is weaker. The spending is insane. The riots on the streets, all over the world are getting worse and worse and worse.
Stick some of your requirement market. Or your requirement into the market that is swinging like a pendulum.
But then make sure you that he come bet, and have some gold or silver.
Please, if you have been thinking of moving some of that gold or silver into gold, don't wait for that crisis.
It's why Lear Capital is here. They will help you understand your options. Whether that's gold IRA or physical delivery. You just, don't -- you can't go back to 2008, but you can choose wisely going forward. Please, call Lear Capital today.
At 800-957-GOLD. Get your free $4200 gold repot, and when you call, 800-957-GOLD.
Make sure you ask them about getting up to $15,000 with free gold or silver with a qualifying purchase. That's 800-957-GOLD. Lear Capital.
Ten-second station ID.
(music)
GLENN: Here's Tulsi Gabbard.
VOICE: Are you buying that the former FBI director didn't know what 86 Trump meant?
VOICE: Absolutely not, Jesse.
That is a ridiculous and insane statement to make. Certainly, within this context, but especially coming from a guy, who is the former director of the FBI.
A guy who spent most of his career prosecuting mobsters, and gangsters.
People who know and execute other humans, and use this exact lingo of 86.
This is the guy who is issuing a hit on President Trump. The president that the American people voted for.
We the American people cannot take this lightly.
Whatever your politics. We cannot allow people to get by without being held accountable, for this kind of public call to assassinate the president of the United States.
The rule of law says, people like him, who issued direct threats against the president of the United States, essentially issuing a call to assassinate him, must be held accountable under the law.
GLENN: You know, I never -- stop, stop. Stop.
You know, you know, I never -- she's not only beautiful, she talk pretty too.
I never thought of it that way.
He's a guy that has been prosecuting gangsters.
And they do say, hey, Nikki no eyes.
I think needs to be eighty-sixed, you know what I mean?
That is the language of assassination in the mob.
And this guy has spent his whole life prosecuting the mob.
I take back what I say, where I thought. He just probably thought. No!
He's at least smart enough to know, that in some circles, that does mean kill!
And you would never do that! You would never, ever, ever, ever do that.
I wouldn't. Would you?
If you knew something meant, in some powerful circles, kill that person.
STU: Of course not. Of course not.
GLENN: Right. Right. But it has innocent verbiage if you were a soda jerk.
STU: Yeah. It does. It does.
GLENN: It does. But if you're the FBI director and you're not working, prosecuting soda.
GLENN: But the people who know what 86 means. I don't -- I guess -- you know what, she's right.
I don't give him a break.
I don't give him a break.
I was giving him a break just a few minutes ago.
But I think Tulsi is right.
RADIO
May 19, 2025
The Diddy Trial: A Distraction or a Cover-Up?
The criminal trial of rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs has been very disappointing so far, BlazeTV host@realjasonwhitlocktells Glenn. Instead of focusing on the biggest story – that Diddy may have been running an Epstein-style blackmailing/trafficking operation – the trial has just focused on Diddy’s own degeneracy. Why is NO ONE going after Diddy’s possible accomplices? Whitlock gives Glenn his terrifying theory: “I think they raided Diddy’s home to strip him of his power…all this is really about is taking away Diddy’s leverage and handing it over to the DOJ or whoever’s responsible for this.”
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Jason Whitlock, welcome to the program. How are you, sir?
JEH: How are you, Glenn?
GLENN: I'm great. I'm great.
I'm not following the Diddy thing. I mean, just -- what I have read this week is absolutely disgusting. I mean, beyond -- I mean, I've read disgusting.
You read it kind of like you watch a car wreck.
I can't even read this stuff. It's so grotesque.
What is actually being exposed here?
What do you think actually happened?
And why aren't they going after anybody, but Diddy?
JASON: I've got my tinfoil hat as I'm talking to you, Glenn.
GLENN: Oh, crap.
Now I can't read his mind.
JASON: So I want the audience to be aware.
So listen, I think that they're holding a trial about Diddy is a really bad person.
He's a sexual degenerate. He turns violent against women that he's dating.
In terms of racketeering and sex trafficking within and all that.
None of that is being addressed.
And I think there's probably a good chance that Diddy either walks, or the jury just convicts him as you're a bad person.
But in terms of this actual sex trafficking. And he's this ringleader of this sexual exploitation deal. They're not proving that case. And I'm not sure that they even have an interest at arguing that case, at this point, Glenn, four or five days into the process. I think they raided Diddy's home to strip him of his power and leverage and blackmail material. And all this is really about is taking away Diddy's leverage and handing it over to the Department of Justice or whoever is responsible for this.
Or stripping him of the most damaging information he had on key people, that they don't want harmed. But in terms of a serious criminal prosecution, of -- of Sean combs.
That's not what transpired here.
GLENN: Well, that was a mouthful. I need my tinfoil hat for that one. What the hell.
So wait a minute. You're saying that maybe he was an operative. Or if he wasn't an operative. He was collecting stuff on people.
And now the government wants that? To either protect those people?
Or to have the power over those people?
JASON: And to strip Diddy of his power. To me, at this point, four or five days in, based on what they're arguing. Yesterday. They basically argued that his girlfriend had -- I don't know about the prosecution, argued that she was the one that paid the sex workers. I mean, this trial is a farce! It is proving that Diddy is a sexual degenerate. Diddy is violent towards women he's dating.
But in terms of, you know, the major, major sex trafficker and all that, no.
They're not even attempting to argue that.
And so I think that Diddy, being a bit of an idiot, probably got too full of himself, and started threatening the wrong people with the information he had. And someone needed to put him in his place. Like, no. You're an operative. You're a tool. You're an asset. You're not some ringleader. You haven't ascended to a place of power, where you can actually use this information, to start blackmailing people. So they stripped him of his information.
GLENN: Oh, my gosh.
JASON: They totally destroyed his reputation. And, again, maybe this jury will be so repulsed by Diddy. Which they could be.
That they'll just convict him of something that hasn't been proven in court.
GLENN: So who are the mysterious they?
JASON: The people that attended Diddy parties.
Who Diddy may have threatened.
And the -- look, look, I hate to use this. Because I'm just spit-balling here.
GLENN: Yeah. You're just speculating.
JASON: Let's take LeBron James, who said he is an important asset in the Democratic Party. And clearly LeBron James is an important asset in the Democratic Party.
And trying to push black people to stay on the democratic plantation.
And so if LeBron James is on tape somewhere.
And he admitted, he went to Diddy's party. Ain't no party like a Diddy party.
If I'm the -- the left, you know, and LeBron is an important asset for me.
I want that information stripped from Diddy. I want control of that information.
LeBron James is our asset. Not Diddy's asset.
I'm using LeBron James. But there may be other people like that. I'll just tell you, if you watch the case. What transpired in the courts.
You can't watch -- they're just basically arguing, hey, man. This guy is basically a pervert.
And him and his girlfriend did some really perverted things. They're not proving there's a criminal case, so now I have to go, well, what was the motive?
What was the big -- they raided this guy like he was Pablo Escobar, and now they're in court, arguing that he's Hugh Hefner?
No! That's not what we were promised. That's not what -- you don't do a raid like that, just, oh, this guy is Hugh Hefner. He hosted sex parties at his house. They raided him like he was Escobar.
And right now, four or five days in, you know, maybe he's -- maybe Diddy is Bill Cosby, but that's it.
GLENN: I have to tell you, I think I'm more disgusted by your answer, if it's true. If it's right, than I am by Diddy and what he was doing.
What I've heard in testimony, which is disgusting and despicable. But I think I'm more disturbed by the answer of, of this, you know, I own these people.
You don't own these people.
My gosh, you want to talk about a plantation!
I -- it's the only thing that makes sense to me, at this point.
Diddy is -- again, he's some talentless rapper of -- from a very questionable background.
And should -- should never -- again, when you build a system, as corrupt as the globalists have.
The -- very corrupt people rise to power.
GLENN: Yes.
JASON: And people that shouldn't have power, end up with power.
And Diddy is potentially one of those people. They created Frankenstein. Well, how do you kill Frankenstein? This is how you do it.
GLENN: Wow. And when is this trial supposed to end?
JASON: I think it's supposed to be six weeks. And, again, this is a distraction. This is sensational.
It's, hey. Look over here.
Diddy and baby oil.
And look at all these sensational stories. But there's no real meat here, and no substance.
You know, is rap music and that industry, nihilistic, and perverted, and sexually degenerate? Yes. We knew all that. We don't need a trial to prove that.
GLENN: And you can't go to jail for that.
JASON: No. No.
GLENN: Well, you can if it gets so perverted, and you're slavery.
JASON: No, no, no. What I mean by that, we have seen juries so repulsed by the defendant, that it just doesn't matter what the government is arguing or whatever. And he may go to jail, just for being a horrible, awful person. And no one is going to feel sorry for him, if that's the case.
But in terms of some sex trafficker. Again, I don't see it, at this point.
GLENN: So this goes to what -- because my question has been. Why are you not going after anyone else, but Diddy?
Because he couldn't have done all of this by himself.
So why is the guy? And it's the same story as -- as Epstein. They're only talking about him. And, you know, Maxwell. That's it!
Nobody else. Haven't even heard a name of anybody else.
JASON: Let me differentiate from my perspective, the difference between Epstein and Diddy.
And based on what's been argued in court. We're not even seeing them suggest that Diddy was doing this with underage people, so far.
He and, you know, the Epstein part, is about underage. And all that.
We haven't even gotten there, with Diddy. We've -- we spent the first four or five days, talking about the sexcapades of him and his girlfriend.
They tried to paint her as a victim. But she looked like a willing participate, so far in court.
GLENN: But this is why this is disturbing me. Because if what was said about these parties, it does -- it does lead to --
JASON: It involves children.
GLENN: It involves children. It involves drugs that people pass out. And it involves rape and everything else.
And on top of that. Probably poor language, is the idea that they're both Diddy and Epstein, are both operatives for some political or governmental entity.
Or group of people, that are trying to control people, and keep them in play.
JASON: Yeah, and James Comey's (inaudible), who is on the prosecution case, he's not going to argue that.
They're not going to go in. Or maybe later, the trial. Because Diddy certainly was someone that was out there. Promoting the democratic party.
Or a guy. He was certainly a political operative for the democratic party. So far. And even in opening statements or whatever, based off my understanding. None of that is being argued.
That his -- his political involvement. His political engagement. None of that is being put on the table. They're keeping this in a very safe space of, hey. Look at how sexually perverted Diddy and his girlfriend were.
GLENN: Hate this.
I absolutely hate this.
Because if we don't clean this stuff up. We have no chance of survival.
You know, it's like the stuff that was happening with the Muslim pedophile rings.
Over in England. Where everybody knew what was going on. And I'm not saying, we know over here, what's going on. But over there, it just became so obvious.
And the government was just covering it up for it. Because it served their purposes. Whatever those purposes might have been. And you can't have a civilization.
You can't have a society that is cohesive at all if these kinds of things are just not taken care of. If they're just -- special favors are paid to both sides, and just make it go away. You don't have a real system of government.
JASON: I'm going to go a step further, Glenn. Or from my perspective.
You can't have a society that allows the form of music that Diddy was involved in. That promotes special degeneracy. And violence.
And drug use.
If that is going to be at the center of American music culture.
If that's going to be promoted at Super Bowl halftime shows. And Diddy is going to be a powerful figure in politics, and in culture.
You can't have a society that properly functions.
GLENN: Okay. So let me take a one-minute break. And I want to ask you, so what is the solution on that? One minute, and we will back with Jason Whitlock.
GLENN: Jason Whitlock is with us.
So what is your solution to that?
JEH: We have to reapply affinity laws. And quit allowing porn and this type of degeneracy. To be protected under allegedly free speech.
And, you know, there was a long time, in America, where, you know, we had laws. And there were things you couldn't do. And say on public airwaves.
And in movies. And things like that. And now, all of a sudden, everything is under free speech.
And I just tonight -- you know --
GLENN: Well, the key there was -- not in movies.
But you just said it, public airwaves. I mean, I remember 1982.
I'm working on the morning show. WPGC in Washington, DC.
I'm 18 years old. The guy across the street is Howard Stern.
He is just making his big impact in Washington, DC.
And I said, on the air, one time. I'm 18 years old. And I said, the word, what I know really pisses me off.
I wish I would have saved this letter. Because I would have it framed today.
It was a full page memo from the program director saying, I don't know who you think you are.
And I don't think you know where you work.
But this is the nation's capital. And we do not use language like quotation mark, pissed on the air. That's how far we've come.
Because now that -- that's nothing. That's nothing. I don't know how you reverse that. I mean, it -- if you believe in freedom, it -- it really should be reversed internally by the people. And I don't know how to make that happen. Other than, you have to find God, people.
JASON: There was a time when we had this. And in the name of freedom, we have now allowed all types of degeneracy. And obscenity, to go mainstream.
GLENN: Right!
And it was in the name of freedom.
Because you have no civilization, if you're just shooting to the bottom of the barrel.
So it was done in the name of freedom, as well.
And it did keep us free!
JASON: There you go. And look, where I go. Well, let's protect the freedoms and the innocence of children!
Rather than just Hugh Hefner's freedom, or Diddy's freedom.
Or whoever runs Porn Hub's freedom. I want to protect the freedom and innocence of children. And it's so obvious the consequence of this pornographic, degenerate freedom that we have allowed.
It compromises the innocence and the freedom of young people, we mainstreamed. A nihilistic mindset. And a perverted degenerate mindset that is harming the freedom.
And so --
GLENN: That is something that I can get behind. In saying, you know, there's rules for children. And what you expose children to.
I'm completely with that. However, how are you going to do that, when you have got drag shows in kindergartens?
JEH: And, again, it's an old slipper slope. It's we've got there because we moved away from obscenity laws.
And we said, we can't infringe on anyone's freedom to be as degenerate and perverted as they want to be. You know, that's un-American.
You know, we're going to have to penalize. Again, I don't understand.
If you're in the rap music industry. And putting out this type of -- you should be taxed in a different rate. There should be different laws and rules. For me, in the sports world. You go into any basketball arena. Anywhere. And I'm talked about high school level. They pump in this hip-hop music, with all this profanity.
And your children are playing basketball.
We have to put a stop to it.
It is -- it's music, in this form of part.
Has so much influence over your heart and mind.
And your culture.
GLENN: It does. Jason, I've got to --
JEH: We have to say, enough is enough.
GLENN: I have to cut you off. I don't know if we agree on the solutions. But we both agree on the problem.
TV
May 16, 2025
WARNING: Financial Armageddon Coming Unless Trump Does THIS | Glenn TV | Ep 432
We’re at a crossroads, and the Trump administration might just be the last hope for a REAL Great Reset, one that doesn’t enslave you — like the one pushed by the U.N., Davos, and progressives — but one that puts you back in charge. From Bretton Woods to the World Economic Forum 2030 Agenda, every step has been a deliberate move to control your money, your freedom, and your future. Glenn heads to the chalkboard to outline multiple “Great Resets” throughout history, and the stories of those empires all end in disaster. Everything Glenn has been warning about is getting closer, and three separate economic models he ran through AI all say the same thing: Financial Armageddon is coming by 2030. America’s massive debt and trade deficits are pushing the dollar toward ruin. If the U.S. dollar loses reserve status, expect skyrocketing inflation, plunging incomes, and a cost-of-living crisis. But he also ran economic models that reveal what America can do to stop the death of the dollar. Trump’s tariffs, tax cuts, and deregulation are forcing some positive change, but is it too late? Justin Haskins, co-author of “The Great Reset” and “Dark Future,” says Trump is giving us a way out — and it doesn’t involve the authoritarian BRICS alliance or the fascism of Europe’s WEF. He’s looking for allies and economic partners to build a new world that puts YOU and America first once again.