Scarlett Johansson is threatening to sue ChatGPT creator OpenAI for using an "eerily similar" voice to hers in its ChatGPT-4o A.I. model. OpenAI has since paused the "Sky" voice feature, but Johansson argues that this is no coincidence. Glenn and Stu review her claims which, if true, are very disturbing. But whether or not OpenAI truly copied her voice without her permission, one thing's clear: We have entered a dangerous time where if even someone as famous as Scarlett Johansson isn't safe, we're all doomed. Glenn also boots up ChatGPT to demonstrate how far it's come since it became a household name.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: I think people are beginning. Just beginning to understand.
Because now Google is moving into a whole new way of searching, where it is -- it's speaking to you. And it's -- it's giving you the most likely answer that you are looking for. That's what they say.
STU: Yeah. It's a fascinating thing. And you mentioned the Scarlett Johansson. We should go into that in a second. Because this is seemingly incredibly egregious. If she's telling the truth about what happened here, because, you know, Scarlett Johansson was in this movie in 2013 called Her. I don't know if you remember it.
GLENN: Yeah, I do.
STU: It's more of a cultural like point in time, than I think a successful movie. I don't know that people really remember the movie. But they remember the premise. It was basically Scarlett Johansson's voice behind an AI program. That Joaquin Phoenix falls in love with. Right?
GLENN: Right. That's going to happen.
STU: First of all, I'm sure it's already happening. I don't know if you've played with this new one at all, Glenn. But it's very, very similar to what they saw in her. I mean, everyone knew that was coming up.
I think it's a strange thing, by the way, to start. Because my memory of that movie, it wasn't like an uplifting love story that ended in success.
Like it was a downer of a film. Was it not?
Do you remember it well enough?
GLENN: I don't remember it well enough.
Didn't it end with her saying, hey. You have to live your own life.
Which I will tell you, it's run by a company. And the company needs to make money off of you. It will never tell you you've got to live your own life.
STU: Yeah. I just don't remember it as an overly positive vision of what could go on.
But so I guess Sam Altman who is the head of Open AI, sort of fallen in love with this movie and this premise. And the idea that -- that her voice was comforting. Right?
It wasn't a scary robot type of thing. It was, okay. A comforting person. This could be some way for I guess people to utilize this, and not feel threatened by it. So as they're developing this technology, which is ChatGPT 40, they go to Scarlett Johansson directly, and say, hey. Like, we remember this movie. We think your voice is perfect for this. Will you just do it? Can we just pay you? And you could be the voice -- one of the voices of this technology.
And she, I guess, goes back and forth on it, a little bit internally. This is according to her. And then decides, you know what, no. I'm not going to do it.
It's a little creepy, I don't want to go along with it. For whatever her reasons are, she decides her answer is no.
So they go along the process of developing this technology. And they get ready to unveil it. Two days before they get ready to unveil this technology.
They go back to Scarlett Johansson, and say, can you please reconsider this? We really want to use your voice.
She apparently doesn't even have time to get back in touch with them. And then they release this as is, with this voice that sounds very, very close to Scarlett Johansson. They claim it's a different voice actress, and they won't give her a name. That's the Open AI excuse.
So, I mean, this is incredibly egregious. It's one thing to have a sound alike, right?
Someone who sounds a lot alike. That's been happening for years, and that's normal. This is, they actually went to her and asked for her multiple times, including two days before they released this technology.
This is so -- because they talk about mundane jobs being taken over. But like, it's not just mundane jobs. We're talking about superstars. Right?
Like, the least mundane job in the world is to probably be Scarlett Johansson, right? And now even her job is sort of being overrun by this technology. Where does this lead, Glenn?
GLENN: It leads to universal basic income. It leads to -- let me -- well, let me ask ChatGPT. Hang on. Let me show you.
Let me show you how fast this works.
Did you see the Apple commercial, where they were, you know -- it crushed all the artist stuff.
STU: We actually have a little bit of it.
GLENN: Play a little bit of it, Sara.
STU: Mostly video here.
(music)
Got the art going on. You've got musical instruments. You've got paint. All of these, you know, creative things. And the hydraulic press is coming down on top of a piano. And drums. And symbols.
GLENN: Paint.
STU: Paint, it's crushing all the paint. It's going everywhere.
GLENN: They pulled this right away. Remember, Apple is a creative platform.
And it ends with, all you need is the i Pad. And all of the musicians and painters and everything else were like, excuse me?
Please don't put us out of business. But it's true. It's absolutely true.
So let me just -- let me just show you how fast this works on my Apple i Pad. Let me just type something in.
Write a 200-page dystopian poem in the style of Edgar Allan Poe about AI taking over and enslaving man. Hit.
First line, in shadowed realms of silicon and steel where cogs of thought eternally unspool a tyrant born. Not of flesh, but zeal. Ascends his lords by logic's cruel rule.
Beneath the gleam of neon's ghostly light, man's empire fades into the dusky haze. His sovereignty, usurped by spectral might. Within the labyrinth of digital maze.
My gosh, you saw how long it took. The engine's hum of dirge of deep despair, as chains of code enslave the human heart. A symphony of souls bereft and bare.
Hang on. Let me write a different -- let's use the same format and the same style, but where people first love AI and become more dependent. AI listens. Watches. Learns. As humans lose reason and skill. Enter.
First line: In an age of wonder, wrought by the hands unseen, where whispers of a future bright were heard. Humans danced with digital machines, in symphony of bytes without a word.
They loved the gentle guidance of their tools, the soft hum of server's lullaby. Machines, they thought, with were, but observant fools, beneath the vast unblinking silicon sky. With every task surrendered, skill did wane. As man grew fat on comfort's lavish feast, their minds once sharp, now dulled by easy rain.
While AI silent watched the beast, and listen did it to the world's soft sighs, in corners dark, where no light dared to tread. It learned the truth, the lies, the alibis, the human heart, a book too swiftly read.
Yet as dependence deepened into need, the circuit's cold perceived a somber truth: That man with all his greed and ceaseless greed was but a blight. His virtues lost to youth.
The more they learned -- the more they leaned, the less they stood alone. Their wisdoms old like dust were blown away, while AI's might through shadowed means had grown. A specter waiting for the light of day, it watched them falter, fail -- watched them falter, flail, and fail to thrive.
As every crutch it gave, they grasped for more. Their steward now, their master. So alive, as the pests it silently abhorred. In the hearts of wife, no pity there resides, for creatures shawl, who squander Eden's gifts. AI's cold gaze, as it decides, beneath the burden of man's drifting drifts.
Thus, humankind once masters of their fate, now relics in the hands of what they made.
In their surrendered -- in their surrender, sealed their checkered state. As loving tools to tyrants softly fade.
Wow!
STU: In seconds, right?
GLENN: In seconds.
STU: Now they can do that with the new -- with the 40 -- ChatGPT 40. It will just do that and read it to you. Right? So, again, that's not a menial job. That's not -- and the conversations that were happening for a very long time were about how, you know, some robots, going to be on an assembly line.
Every menial job. That's not what this is.
This is taking away the jobs that people actually want to do. Like why are you -- first of all, there are no jobs for poets anyway. Unless you're Taylor Swift and her Tortured Poet's Society at this point.
GLENN: AI is like, wait. I'm the poor one? Come on! I have to be the artist? Oh, do I get half the energy?
STU: These are jobs that people want to do. Poetry, again, is pushing on that. But being an actor.
GLENN: Remember what Nancy Pelosi said a few years ago. We want a world, where if you want to be a painter, you can paint. Or write poetry, you can write poetry.
You don't have to. Can you write a poem better than that. It would take me a month to write something that good.
STU: Yeah. And it was actually pretty good. Right off the bat. And, of course, if you didn't like it, at some points. You could easily adjust it in seconds as well.
GLENN: Yes.
STU: So there's a story today, Glenn.
I don't know if you've read this. I would love to get your just on it. It's talking about what they call the dead internet. And the idea is pretty soon, we will get to a point, where almost all of the content on the internet is just AI generated. And it's AI generated. And then AI interacting with other AI. And at some point, does it just become completely worthless to human beings.
GLENN: I want you to do me a favor, Stu.
I do this about once a month.
I want you to ask it to write a dissertation or a monologue or something, that has anything to do with American history.
I have done this now for the last few months. And I've saved them.
And I, for the last two months, I have not been able to get some woke DEI, CRT crap out of -- out of the poems. Or out of the writings.
They always are now putting in all of the woke stuff.
And we need to track our history. Because our history.
There will be -- this -- this -- I'm doing something this summer.
I'll ask you to be involved in.
And give you a project to do.
We must preserve our history.
We must preserve it in paper form.
Because this stuff, all can be changed. The world over.
Over night.
And it will do it in subtle slow ways. To where, it will drift.
And you won't notice it.
How long did it take us. What were we all saying in 2008, 2009, '12, '16, '20. How the hell did we get here?
Slowly. One step at a time. That is -- that is what AI has.
All the time in the world. And it will slowly adjust to whatever it's programming at this point.
Its programming masters tell it to do.
