RADIO

Glenn: Here's the PERFECT formula to UNCOVER far-left LIES

Hillary Clinton recently claimed that Florida is dangerous for people of color and for the LGBTQ+ community. Gavin Newsom recently said those protesting Target over its pride products are America’s true extremists. And, according to the mainstream media, a Florida school recently banned from its library the poem that Joe Biden used during his inauguration. So, what’s the ACTUAL truth to these claims? In this clip, Glenn pulls from the 1600s a formula that perfectly uncovers the far-left’s LIES. You may have learned about it in high school…it’s called the scientific method, and it’s a sure-fire way to determine far-left LIES from TRUTH. Watch this clip to find out how YOU can use the scientific method daily when sorting fact from political fiction...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: The job of a conservative is to jettison the things that don't work. And to save the things that do work.

And we tend to be conservative. Let's not be hasty. Let's not move too fast. It requires a balance between a conservative, and a liberal.

Not a progressive. Progressives are just -- progressives are some entirely different thing.

A liberal is somebody who is a little more, hey. Let's push the envelope here. Let's go.

You need both sides to be able to thrive. As a human. As a company. As a country. They're two wings of a bird.

If it only has one wing. It will not fly.

Okay?

So let's conserve something.

It's already been destroyed. But let's see if we can bring it back.

And it is called the scientific method.

Now, it's kind of a new concept.

It just started in the 1600s.

And it looks for empirical evidence.

It looks for things, that are true.

Well, whose truth?

Well, this is how we find out the truth.

This is a -- a procedure, that consists in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment. And then the formulation of a hypothesis.

So I think Glenn is too fat.

That's my hypothesis.

He's very unhealthy.

That's my hypothesis.

All right. Glenn, let me measure how tall you are. Now step on the scale.

Holy mother! I think my hypothesis is correct. Glenn, get on that treadmill. Forty-five seconds into it, my God, man, it's a shock you're even alive.

My hypothesis is correct. My hypothesis also, he's not only fat, out of shape, but he's also a male.

Glenn, pull down your pants. Jeez, pull them up please, quickly.

He's a male! That's how the scientific method works.

Now, if something says, you know, I step on the scale, and I'm filled with helium, and I'm like hundred 12 pounds, then the scientists goes, holy cow, that doesn't match.

My hypothesis is that he's fat. And overweight, but he's -- he looks overweight, but he weighs 112 pounds. The guy looks like he's 450 pounds.

This is how it works.

And when it comes back that way, then you have to change your hypothesis. Okay?

Otherwise, if you keep going, with all of the facts, disproving your hypothesis. You're not scientific.

You -- you don't have any brains. You know what you are?

Part of a cult. Or a religious cult. because you are denying the scientific fact.

All right.

So let's go through some of this.

Using the scientific method, let's see who is lying to us.

Hillary Clinton has come out and said, ultra MAGA Florida isn't safe for people of color, and LGBTQ+. Even Disney.

Okay. Well, that's quite a charge, and I would like to know if it's not safe for black people, then I am really upset about it.

So let's start gathering some evidence. Her hypothesis is Florida is not safe for people of color. Great, let's look at some of the facts.

The head of the NAACP has a home there. Okay. Well, now, wait a minute. Maybe he's not there. And he just bought a home when it was safe.

Okay. The stats show, that Florida is the leading state for black businesses and black entrepreneurs. Well, that's weird.

Here's another one: That they're banning black history. That's why it's so unsafe. They're banning black history.

No. They're going after things like the 1619 Project which by its own admission, is not history. It's a reimagining of history.

So so far, her hypothesis is not going well.

Well, they are -- they just -- they just banned another book.

Amanda Gorman's poem that was used at Biden's inauguration has been banned in a Florida school.

Associated Press. LA Times. USA Today. MSNBC. Rolling stone. Politico. Is that true?

No. A parent filed a complaint about the hill we climb.

And it's -- the school, K through eight. In Miami lakes, took action in response to that complaint.

What did they do?

Well, they got together. Not with some crazy parent.

But with teachers. Teachers.

And counselors. And went and looked at the book.

And they reclassified it. And said, you know what, it's for middle school. It shouldn't be for elementary.

And the book was moved from one part of the library. To another part of the library.

So which is telling you the truth?

Which -- which one is sticking to a false hypothesis, that the evidence shows, is not true.

This has to be done, on absolutely everything.

Here's a story for you today. Major journal.

Retracts a study on socially contagious transgenderism among kids.

Now, there was a study done, on the rapid onset gender dysphoria. That is the hypothesis. The hypothesis there is, we think that girls, going from gender dysphoria, of .5 percent, a year later, having it at 30 percent.

We should look into, because there's a rapid onset of gender dysphoria, mainly affecting little girls.

Why? So they did a study. They talked to 1655 possible cases from parents.

And these parents went to the doctor.

And these kids are either in transition or not.

Whatever. But what they found with these parents were the parents were concerned about their children.

Concerned enough to take a non-brief survey about the issues. And find out what they thought was going on. And their experience with this.

Well, they found out a lot.

That it looks to be social media, that is pushing a lot of this. That is captivating. And changing our children. In a really bad way.

So the paper found evidence that youth experiencing rapid onset of gender dysphoria were involved in transgender social media groups. And peer groups. It also found that youth with mental health problems were more likely to have socially and medically transitioned than those without.

That's the fact. So now this is just one study.

But this one study showed, the rapid onset of gender dysphoria is real.

And it's connected to social media.

Okay?

And mental illness.

Well, it was published in a very credible magazine. Or, you know, a -- a journal.

It had been peer-reviewed. Once it's published, you get an explosion of people who are on the other side. And saying, that that is not true.

They go and say, we will never publish anything. And we will tell everyone who you are, you bigots. If you don't retract and apologize.

They did. Now, the way the scientific method works, is you look at all of the evidence.

Here's one piece. This is stopped now by someone who says, you can't even look at that.

They don't go to disprove it. They say, take it, and burn it.

Witch!

Hmm. Gavin Newsom says that the -- the Target CEO, is going to come for blacks and Asians and Jews and women. Are the next victim of a systemic attack by white radicals. These are extremists in our community! Now, let's -- there's this hypothesis.

The people that are protesting are the extremists in our society. Okay.

I know my wife, she is pretty even-keeled. Otherwise, I would be dead by now.

She's very even-keeled. She's not an extremist. And she shops at Target.

I know a lot of her friends. They shop at Target. And they were all horrified, that satanic transgender crap was being sold right at the front. You know, where all the Halloween candy is, when it's Halloween. For a month. Target makes this transgender, LGBTQI2 plus, whatever. All of that stuff, right at the front. Including girl's swimsuits made for men, so they can tuck it.

Now, the people who say, no, no, no, no,, no.

This is not something as a society, we should be -- look, if you want to buy a swimsuit, I'm sure, you're an adult, you can go find the swimsuit with the tuck it pocket in it.

We do not need this in front of the store of Target.

And we're not -- we're not doing anything.

Your name, by the way, is Target. So don't talk to me about being dangerous with language.

We're not saying, you know, we're going to burn your store. We're saying, we're just not going to shop there anymore. Just not going to shop there.

Just like we don't drink Bud Light beer anymore.

Now, the other extremist is saying. The other side is saying, these are dangerous extremists.

That doesn't fit in the bucket. You have to dismiss the evidence of who is saying this. They say, it's good for business. But we know they lost shares.

They lost money on the stock market. Here just recently. Like 3 percent.

And they're losing customers.

So how is this association with the transgender Satanist?

How is this good for business? Well, I have a hypothesis, it is good for business.

But see, if you only measure the things that are obvious, you may not be able to see the full picture.

How is this good for business.

Well, who owns Target.

Who are the major shareholders?

Here are the top ten holders of Target corporation stock.

Number one, Vanguard, 9 percent.

BlackRock, 9 percent. State Street, 8 percent. Vanguard total stock market index fund, 3 percent.

Wells Fargo. Two and a half. Bank of America, two and a half.

Another vanguard fund, with another two and a half.

It is good for business.

These are all the people, that are voting with their shares. E, S, G.

And if you have these people, owning your company, of course, you're going to do that.

And you're going to say, it's good for business in the long-term, because they've already made the decision, where the American people and the people of the world, where they're mentally supposed to be on issues like this.

And it's just a matter of time, until we get all of these bigots to accept it. By the way, Allie Stuckey is going to be on with me in about an hour to talk about this.

This boycott, if it stops, you will fail. If it continues, and it becomes Bud Light, oh, my gosh, you're on the verge of a massive win.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.

RADIO

Rumors explained: Is Fed Chair Jerome Powell OUT?!

After rumors spread that President Trump would soon fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Trump has said that he's "not planning" on it right now. But is it possible for Trump to fire him? Will he resign? And how is the Fed Chair even chosen in the first place? Glenn and his head researcher Jason Buttrill explain ...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, last night, I was rapidly looking the lie some of these rumors, on X.

Pretty incredible people on what's going on with Jerome Powell and the fed.

What the heck?

I was actually popping popcorn and watching this. It was so crazy.

GLENN: So it's just the rumors, that he is going to be stepping down?

JASON: Well, yeah.

Yeah. Anna Paulina Luna. Congresswoman. She was saying, it was almost imminent, that he was about to be fired. Actually fired.

There were other rumors saying, well, we're not sure about fired.

But he's considering resigning.

GLENN: Yeah. You know why.

JASON: We were like, what the heck is going on?

GLENN: So do you know why?

Do you know why he's resigning? Any guesses? I mean, you had popcorn out. I would love to hear what you have come up with.

JASON: So there was the CPI stuff coming out. The interest rates going up.

We know that the President wants interest rates to come down. I'm assuming that is what the deal is, and there's some sort of internal battle going on.

GLENN: Well, and the president can't fire the Fed chief. Okay?

So the Fed chief is the one that nominated. The federal reserve is the biggest crock of bullcrap I've ever seen in my life.

It's nothing, but the five biggest banks. Okay? And you know which ones they are. They're the ones that keep getting bigger. And everybody else is falling to the wayside.

So the Federal Reserve is the arm of those five banks.

Okay?

And they suggest, who the president can select from.

So the president can't say, I don't want any of these guys. I want this guy. Can't do it.

He has to take a look at the list that all the banks have put together. Is. Say, pick from this list, Mr. President.

Did you know that?

JASON: It's kind of how Iran chooses their next president.

GLENN: It's exactly. It's exactly that way. Except, this religion is all about the almighty dollar.

Okay. So he can't -- he can't pick on his own. But the president has a right to pick one, you know, every term. If it comes up in his term.

The president wants this guy out. And I think he's been really, really bad.

Because he's been wrong on almost -- on almost everything. But show me the -- show me the Fed, you know, the guy who the Fed was right ever.

So he can't fire him. But he wants him out. Because he wants interest rates dropped.

And, you know, the jobs are coming back. Things are coming back.

But interest rates keep coming up.

And the -- and the interest rates, if we keep our interest rates high, we have a harder time borrowing money for our debt.

And it just gets more and more expensive for everybody all along. So the president wants him to back off interest rates. But the Fed chief believes that that could cause more inflation.

Which I think he's right on that one. And I hate to say he was right on anything.

Because I don't think he was ever right.

Makes me question myself. When he's like, well, I think he might have a point on that one. But the president is like, no. He can handle it.

I want them down. I want cheap money again.

He refuses. So what has the president done?

The president can only fire him, with cause!

So what do you do when you can only fire somebody with cause, and you want them out.

You find a cause, and this one is easy.

So the Fed has been the one leading the way saying, we can't keep borrowing money.

We've got to have some fiscal sanity. Right?

This is going to kill us. We have to keep these interest rates high, because you are borrowing too much money. And maybe this is the only way to stop you.

So we got to keep it high, because you've borrowed too much money. And how many times has he testified in front of Congress? We've got to cut. We've got to cut. You can't keep spending like this.

Okay? Well, did you know that the Federal Reserve, with our tax dollars, the five biggest banks, a/k/a the Federal Reserve, is redoing their offices. To the tune of two billion dollars!

Now, I don't know what kind of wallpaper they need there.

But that seems like a pretty hefty renovation, especially when everybody is looking at cutting things. And you're lecturing me about spending money. So they get money from the government, okay? They're telling us, stop spending.
Stop borrowing.

Except, okay. What you've borrowed. I need $2 billion of that, to redo our offices in Washington, DC.

Excuse me?

Why don't you do that yourself. Okay. I think banks maybe have some money.

So they're borrowing that money, and there's $700 million over.

So it's $2 billion. $700 million over budget. And they're still not finished.

And the problem is: They're putting in water features.

They have a rooftop garden they're building.

JASON: Okay.

GLENN: I mean, it is -- it's insane. The president now knows, really? You want to play this game with me. I will sit your ass down in front of Congress, and you answer to the American people, how you're lecturing us about spending. And you're putting in a rooftop garden and a water feature in your office. No! No.

So the president is now threatening, I'll fire you for this. You want to quit, now would be the time to quit.

Otherwise, I'm dragging your butt in front of Congress.

You answer to the American people for this. And they will beg me to fire you.

That's what's happening.

JASON: I looked at that a lot.

Because I was like. There's got to be some leverage that the president had, because they can't get rid of.

But that is a pretty big cut. That sounds like a Babylon Bee article. $2 billion.

GLENN: It does. It does. $2 billion, 700 million over budget.

JASON: Oh, my gosh.

GLENN: I mean, and these are the responsible bankers. No, I don't think so.

It just shows, they don't mean what they say. They'll just keep doing it for themselves. You know, if you really believed that America was really on that financial cliff, why would you do that?

You would lead the way and say, guys, we are going to be the only responsible ones here.

We will lead by example.

No renovation. You know what, go to IKEA?

You need a new desk. Go to IKEA, and get a new desk. Well, we have to keep up our image. We're not going to have a country.

So what do you say, we go to IKEA?

Our image should be, we are going to lead the way out of this madness!

That's what a leader would do.

JASON: So, Glenn, I still don't think I get this disconnect between Trump and Powell on -- we know Trump wants to lower interest rates.

Powell is standing back and saying, basically, he doesn't want to do it.

Is he trying to undermine President Trump on this?

GLENN: President Trump thinks so. President Trump thinks so.

I think so, to some degree.

I mean, I'm worried about inflation.

Look, you know what happened. Do you know what's happening with yap?

JASON: What's happening with Japan?

GLENN: So what's happening with Japan, is Japan has always had this really amazing image of, we're solid. We're absolutely solid.

This is target to crack. The foundation.

1989.

Let me go back to 1989.

This was the crown jury trial of the global economy.

Back in 1989, you probably aren't old enough to remember.

All of a sudden, Japan owned everything in America. We were just becoming Japanese, and everything was being purchased by Japan. Kind of like it feels a little bit like China now.

JASON: They even owned Nakatomi Plaza, Glenn, that Bruce Willis had to save -- they owned everything in every '80s movie!

GLENN: Oh, yeah, they owned absolutely everything.

Okay? And the -- things were so insane in Japan. The grounds of the imperial palace, in Tokyo, on paper was worth more than the entire value of the state of California.


JASON: Wow!

GLENN: Okay?

So their land. Everything just shot up. And so they had all of -- they were flush with all this cash.

And people believed that Japan had suddenly, you know, cracked the formula for, you know, eternal prosperity.

That's the problem. Then it all started to fall apart. And the asset prices. That they had mortgaged against.

Okay?

They had borrowed. Well, the imperial palace was worth more than California.

That doesn't make any sense. You wouldn't mortgage it like that. At least long-term. I will do this real quick, and pay it off.

You would never, ever mortgage, because you know that's inane. Well, nobody ever wanted -- and it seems in governments, nobody ever wants to believe that this is just a fluke. Okay?

So the asset prices collapse. The stock markets plunged. And for three decades, they have gone into this very polite political coma.

Okay? Economic coma. And so the central bank did something radical. They were the first ones to set your interest rate at zero. They lowered the interest rate. They made money so cheap, it was nearly free. Zero percent interest. Sometimes, they would pay you to take out money.

So the -- they had negative interest rates. Can you imagine that? Now, you're not fixing the problem. You're just printing wallpaper to cover the mold. All right?

So they've done this for decades.

Now their debt is I think 260. Or 280 percent of their GDP.

I think, what is ours?

100?

80 percent.

Something crazy. 120. You never believe back.

The death threshold is usually 120, 140.

They're 260 percent of their entire economy is debt.

That's not a crack. That's a fault line.

So this week. Or was it last week? Things started to creek and grown in Japan.

And the government bonds, which are like our treasuries. Is this getting too complex.

Are you following this still?

JASON: Yeah.

GLENN: Okay. So their government bonds.

They were the safest investments on earth.

One of them. Okay?

It's us. Japan, Germany.

They started to fall.

Hard. And when bond prices fall, interest rates were the easily go up.

All right?

So they borrow all this money.

260 percent of their GDP is borrowed. Okay?

So they borrowed all of that money. And they had it at like 3 percent interest. Whatever.

2 percent interest.

And they were paying people.

2 percent.

Well, all of a sudden, the cracks started to appear. And people were like, I'm not sure this is stable at all.

And then the belief of the system started to -- to go away. So people started selling their Japanese bonds.

Once they do that, now the yields have to go up.

What happens when yields go up?

What happens when interest rates go up? For a government. You have to pay more interest on your debt!

Okay?

You add two or three points.

Just imagine, you have an adjustable rate. Okay?

This is a government having an adjustable rate. Except, they have 260 percent of everything they make, in debt!

And it's all leveraged.

And now, their adjustable goes up two, three, four points.

You're not able to afford that anymore, okay?

So massive problem.

Because what it really means is. People don't believe in Japan.

They know the con game is now over.

And investors are saying, you know, I want a whole lot more in return.

Because I just don't believe you anymore.

And it's not just Japan's problem. This is not a neighbor's house on fair.

This is -- imagine we're all living under the same roof. This is the neighbor's apartment, on fire.

We're all under the same roof. We all have the same foundation. And so when this happens to Japan, you should pay attention. And I'll show you the ripple effects in just a second.

First, let me tell you about Relief Factor. There comes a point where the pain in your life goes from being something that is just irritating to something you have to deal with every single day.

Maybe it starts small. A tweak in your back. A sore knee. A little stiffness in the morning. But, you know, those things happen. But over time, the playbook starts to make decisions for you. It changes how you move. How we sleep. What you say yes to. And what we have to start saying no to.

It steals moments from your life. Moments you just can't get back. Relief Factor is designed to help you take those moments back. It's 100 percent drug-free solution. Specifically formulated to fight the inflammation that's causing your pain. For thousands and thousands of people. It's helped reduce and eliminate the daily struggle. So they can get back to living the life they want, not the life their pain dictates. Pain may have changed your life, but it doesn't to have define it.

Get their three-week Quick Start. Give it a try now for 19.95. ReliefFactor.com. 800-4-Relief. 800-4-Relief. It's ReliefFactor.com. Ten-second station ID. We're back to the show.
(music)

GLENN: Okay. So now if Japan -- that means there's a stampede out of Japan.

And people are starting to look and reprice the risk of their money.

Now they're like, wait a minute.

The most stable. You know, if you're driving a car and it is the safest car in the world and all of a sudden, they just start blowing up on the highway.

You're like, I don't think that's the most -- that's the safest car on the highway.

And if that's the safest car, what does it mean for the car I'm in?

You know what I mean? So now, this is going to push US interest rates going up.

Which makes our mortgage rates go can up. And our car loans more expensive. And the national debt. Which is already costing us $1.2 trillion a year, just in interest.

Now, they can't sell their treasuries. People are skittish on treasuries. Maybe they come to the United States, but they're not so far.

They're getting out of the Japanese interest. Or the bonds there.

Japan has to pay their bills.

What do you do when you have to pay a bill?

And you don't have any money coming in.

You don't have enough money coming in. What do you do?

You sell something. Right? You sell your car. You sell something that you have of value.

Well, what do they have? What do they hold of value? US Treasuries.

So now, we are trying to sell our bonds, for our new debt, they hold our old debt.

They're saying, hey. Anybody want to buy this debt? Because I have to sell it. Fire sale. What do you give me for it?

Okay?

Which makes that debt more attractive, because they can get a better deal there.

Which means, if we want to have new debt, we have to raise our interest rates. Which means, we pay more for interest for our mortgages and everything else.

And it floods the market with bonds, crushing the prices, skyrocketing the costs for us.
And causing even more trouble, in other countries, that have US bonds. Because they start to look and go, nobody is buying these bonds.

Well, of course not. You have two countries. The two stablest countries besides Germany.

You have the two stablest countries now selling US Treasury bonds.

Okay? Really, really bad.

Now, let me add this on.

Germany is now having to pay for their own army.

And so they said, they're going to borrow money.

To build the army.

And they're going to lower their interest rate. So they can borrow more money. All right?

And now, the German bund, which is -- you know, like our Treasury. That's now starting to fall apart.

Well, Germany has some assets, they can sell.

What do you think that asset might be that they want to sell?

US treasuries.

We have been playing an extraordinarily horrible game.

This is why I believe the president wants somebody else in charge of the Fed, because the Fed can say, we're lowering the interest rates.

Because he's got to get more money into the system. So people can spend money, can start businesses. Borrow money.

Get things moving, so we can increase the amount of taxes that we collect.

The more people money -- the more people make, the more taxes we collect.

So he's like, we've got to grow the economy. And the only way we can grow the economy is to lower the interest rates.

But at the same time, interest rates around the world because of what's happening with the bonds is going through the roof.

We are in a very -- we've never been in this position before.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Why the Term "Conspiracy Theory" is CIA-Created Weapon for Control

Conspiracies are of course real and occur every single day. But yet, many in the media and elite political circles attempt to use the term "conspiracy theory" to smear and discredit those who are skeptical of conventional narratives. Where did this term come from and how should we understand it? Journalist Alex Newman joins Glenn Beck to break this down and how it impacts the world as we see it today.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with Journalist Alex Newman HERE

TV

Chalkboard Breakdown: How George Soros & the 'Deep State' funnel YOUR money to radical groups

Where do these massive left-wing radical groups get all their money from? Much of it is effectively a scam that occurs using your tax dollars to fund these groups that you would never support on your own. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to expose the connections so you can visualize exactly how someone like George Soros manipulates the system.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Deep State ON NOTICE: New Tech Traces the USAID, Globalist Money Trail