President Biden has said that he WON'T step in to help negotiate the port workers strike that's affecting the East Coast and Gulf Coast. But he's "Union Joe"! So, why is he sitting THIS strike out? Glenn has a terrifying theory: Is Biden's goal to create a "polycrisis" right around the election that would cripple America enough for the globalists to complete their "fundamental transformation"? Is chaos the plan? Glenn also points to FEMA's apparent lack of support for the people affected by Hurricane Helene. Apparently, FEMA has a new "top priority," and it's NOT "helping people" ...
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
STU: I ask again. And you asked this question. You mentioned this question yesterday, as to why you were not worried about the longshoreman strike as much as you think you should be. With a caveat.
GLENN: With a caveat. The caveat is, I don't think we're dealing with the way politicians and, you know, governments have always worked. Everything has changed.
STU: Maybe that's true. But like, we have five weeks to the election.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: You have number one, a situation with longshoremen going on strike. As you mentioned today. You went through the time line of this, in hour one. If you didn't hear that, go back and listen to it.
GLENN: It's important that you listen to it. You should not panic today.
You know, you might want to go to the store and get some extra stuff. If you just want to be really prepared. But starting next week, and by week three. And definitely by week four. At week four, we're at a national crisis.
STU: At week four. That would be the week before the election.
GLENN: Yes.
STU: Okay? And yet, I show you this strike is going forward, despite the fact that the president of the United States, a man even in background reporting, does want Kamala Harris to win.
It's not like he's trying to sink her presidency. Even though, he's seemly angry, because she's blowing him off all the time.
Why isn't this coming to a halt? Why isn't he using all of his power to make sure this doesn't happen.
Not because he cares about the longshoreman.
Or not because he cares about the US economy. He seemingly wants to sink that. Because he cares about the future of the power, that he's worked so hard and be she's worked so hard.
To gather.
GLENN: Okay. So let me start with the official reason. He's not getting involved because the president should not get involved in union fights, until it becomes a real problem.
STU: I ask, was that worth saying?
It's such a ridiculous --
GLENN: I just want to make sure.
STU: I know you're just doing your job. But that is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.
They get involved in everything. All of a sudden, they're Libertarians?
GLENN: Yeah. And he stopped the train strike, because before the train strike happened. He got involved in that one.
STU: Heavily involved. All he has done is talk about his accomplishments with labor.
GLENN: Okay. So why wouldn't he get involved this time?
STU: Yeah. Say, hey, guys, do this after the election.
Why wouldn't he stop this?
GLENN: I mean, I -- I have my answer.
And my answer is probably the answer that everybody else is coming to the conclusion on.
It -- it is -- that's -- that's not the goal here.
STU: The goal is not to win the election?
GLENN: The goal is to cripple the United States.
And to create a polycrisis.
So let's just say, it's a close election.
Okay?
And there's arguments back and forth. After the election.
After the election.
STU: Which, it would be shocking if there wasn't that situation.
GLENN: Correct. How do you make that worse?
STU: I mean, they keep inventing new ways.
GLENN: Uh-huh. Well, here's one.
You make it worse, by taking the economy.
And making the economy even more unstable.
Okay?
Because, look, if those who believe with good reason, that this government is not for an America. The way we know it.
They have to give it the final blow, to put it out, to be able to restart in a new system.
Okay?
STU: Uh-huh.
GLENN: And you can't do that without -- with just one crisis. You need a polycrisis. You need a financial crisis.
You need a war crisis. You need an election crisis. You need a -- a -- a financial crisis, a pandemic crisis. And an election crisis.
You have to have more than one.
STU: Okay. But -- and I think, because this adds to another question that I have, on the same front.
You have this hurricane that's going through all of these swing states. You have Georgia and North Carolina.
And, I mean, Florida, there's even been close polling, in some circles.
You have all this stuff going on.
In these really important states.
And they seem to be completely up concerned, to even giving the appearance that they're doing a good job. I mean, they're not even doing the press conferences in front of the rows and rows of trucks.
Today, they are out there, I guess a little bit. But, I mean, it's been a pretty bad response.
Even just -- I'm not at all surprised, they would be bad at doing this because they're completely incompetent. If that's what it was, I would not be surprised. But it's not even an effort to tell the story, that they're doing a good job.
Again, because the polycrisis thing. And I know you're down this road.
And I'm not surprised you are.
GLENN: Uh-huh.
STU: But like, wouldn't that be best done after you had power?
You are about to blow, the power that you have, just flush it down the toilet.
If you lose this election. And give power to the man you call, you know, orange Hitler.
GLENN: Well, yes.
If it's a clear victory. And this would add to a clearer victory.
But, you know, you also -- you know, all you need it to be is close.
And if Biden wins the popular vote, and Trump wins 270.
You think that will stop them?
They will say, no. See, that's why we have to get rid of the electoral college. It will be a crap storm. Okay.
For matter what happens.
STU: Not the way usually that term is utilized.
GLENN: The FCC.
So let me give you a couple of scenarios.
Why do they not respond on the hurricane?
Scenario number one. Take them at their word.
They are. People in those states just aren't seeing it. Donald Trump is lying. You know, whatever.
Okay. So there is scenario number one.
They are. And you just don't see it.
Don't believe that one.
STU: Uh-huh.
GLENN: Scenario number two.
Is -- they actually believe this stuff.
STU: What do you mean this stuff?
GLENN: If you go to the FEMA website, FEMA is no longer what we thought it was. We told you at the time, when they were changing all of this, warning, they're changing everything.
It's no longer really a federal emergency management.
They're going to manage prior to. And then manage our problems.
Okay? So here -- according to their own website. There are now three goals, for FEMA.
STU: Okay.
GLENN: Okay. What do you think FEMA's number one goal has always been?
STU: To respond quickly to a national emergency.
GLENN: Okay. Goal number one, not that.
STU: Not that.
GLENN: Goal number one is to instill equity as a foundation of emergency management.
Now, so in other words, if this were a traditionally oppressed group, which I think Appalachia could easily qualify that.
STU: Too white.
GLENN: No, no, no. Too white. So what does equity have to do this with this?
White people wiped out.
Okay. They get what they deserve.
We want to focus on those oppressed.
Okay. That's what equity is about. Goal number two. Lead a whole community, in climate resilience.
Well, they're doing that job. They're on television saying, this is all climate control. This is all a problem with the climate.
These things are going to happen
STU: And they pass their multi-trillion dollar bill. What they call the Inflation Reduction Act.
GLENN: So out of the three goals.
They're accomplishing number one and number two, by not acting.
Number three, their goal is to promote and sustain a ready FEMA and prepared nation.
So what does that mean?
To promote and sustain a ready FEMA.
And ready for action.
Ready for what? Goal number one, instill equity.
Goal number two. Lead the community in climate resilience.
Resilience.
So when does FEMA come in?
FEMA will come in, as everything is being rebuilt.
And saying, no, no, no.
You can't build it that way. No, no, no. We have to have climate resilience. This isn't climate resilient.
That's their mission.
So now, perhaps, they actually believe in that mission.
This isn't helping a -- a community, that has been historically oppressed.
So we -- that's where -- equity is number one.
We're -- we're going to do our job.
But it's climate resilience. It's not the emergency.
And the third reason is: We're here to promote those two things, and prepare the nation for those two things.
I mean, that logically, without any ill will toward anyone, I don't have to -- I can assume the best of them.
And make this case.
That's why they're not responding in the traditional way.
Because that's not what they do anymore.
But understand, where are my tax dollars?
Understand, your tax dollars, will go to build the resilience, after.
This is like, you've been paying your mortgage on your -- on your house. And the bank says, by the way. We're no longer doing that anymore. You know, you still have to keep paying the mortgage. But you're out of that house. We're doing apartments now. So you pay for that house, and here's your apartment. And you have to pay for that too. That's what's happening. They have told you, your taxes are going for emergencies. Well, here's a huge emergency. They're not responding to it. Because they've changed the game.
STU: Hmm. I mean, in some ways too, this appears to be their back-handed way of implementing many of the policies they've wanted for a long time.
For example, it's really hard to sell people on let's say, reparations.
You know, people don't want that.
They don't like that.
Kamala Harris is running away from her past positions on it.
GLENN: Yes. One other thing, Stu. If you have a community without water. And you have no food.
And there's no infrastructure, how do you think those elections will run in those states?
STU: Poorly.
GLENN: Yeah. How do you think those people even show up, to cast a vote?
STU: That's a good point. Because they're not exactly hard-core Democrat areas.
GLENN: No. You've just taken a huge swath of Donald Trump's voters and made it pretty difficult for them to go vote.
You think FEMA is going to go out there and set up voting booth?
