RADIOOctober 24, 2022

The left is 'IN FAVOR OF WAR’ & it’s all over NONSENSE

For the first time since World War II, the U.S. Army's 101st Airborne Division was deployed to Europe. They're just miles from the Ukraine border, and potentially could step-in if a NATO country is in danger from Russia and Putin. But if America were to become involved, Glenn says, it would likely be because of oil and pipelines...which the Biden administration so badly wants to destroy. In this clip, Glenn and Stu discuss how America just took one step closer to war and why that war — thanks to the far-left — would be based on NONSENSE and a 'warped philosophy.'

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I want to put into perspective, what you are facing.

There is too much debt in the world. And we are inflating that debt away. Central banks are.

And it will inflate everything that you have, away. You are looking at a time right now, where we could be at war, at any time.

We just put the 101st Airborne division, into Europe to back NATO up, and the Pentagon said yesterday, they are ready to go. They could go into Ukraine at any time. That's terrifying.

Do you want the United States to be at war with our soldiers, with Russia and Ukraine?

By the way, that will only make your gas, your food, everything else, much more expensive.

STU: And you will learn if this occurs, that is the least of your worries.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: You will not be caring about gas prices, if this thing breaks out in real terms.

GLENN: This is not good at all.

Not good at all. And why has this really been done?

This has been done because of the fight over pipelines. Oil pipelines.

The West has decided, we're going to cut off all oil and gas. Going to cut it off. You don't need it anymore.

Well, actually you do. But, you know, we're going to destroy it all. So then we can't go back.

That's basically, what they're doing right now. And they're doing it out in the open. And they're claiming that this is for climate. But it's not for climate.

Fires burn more than 4 million acres. Admitting -- admitting twice as much green house gas, as the state of California's total reductions over the last 20 years. So one wildfire season, nullified two decades' worth of reductions.

This is not about -- you can't -- you can't contain what's happening. And in the places where they're -- they're not insane, just evil. Places like China, they've completely changed the game.

STU: Oh, my gosh. It's incredible. Let me put this in the framework of the Inflation Reduction Act for a moment. Now, you know this act had nothing to do with inflation. Not breaking news there.

GLENN: No.

STU: But Joe Biden talked about this. Really, the only thing they talked about in this bill was the climate stuff. He said, this bill was the biggest step forward on the climate stuff, ever. Ever.

And it will allow us to boldly take additional steps toward meeting all of my climate goals, and the ones we set out when we ran. So that's the most important climate legislation, ever. Ever.

Now, Kamala Harris was asked, what her favorite part of this climate legislation was. And she gave an amazing answer.

VOICE: What are some parts of the inflation act, this amazing new law, that you are excited about?

VOICE: I mean, so much. So much.

STU: Right.

VOICE: One of the things I'm very excited about is what we have been doing in terms of electric vehicles.

STU: Okay.

VOICE: And I have a particular fondness. I must tell you for electric school buses. I love electric school buses.

STU: I love those two.

GLENN: We're manufacturing them in our country. I've been to the manufacturing plants. I've been on these electric school buses.

STU: Wow.

VOICE: Aside from the pandemic, on a daily basis. 25 million children in our country, first day, goes to school.

On those diesel fuel school buses.

STU: Wow. The wheels of the bus about it round and round.

It's so incredible. There is a line in the bill. About electric school buses, it's about clean, heavy-duty vehicles.

The EPA-funding program, Class 6, and Electric commercial vehicles, including trucks, transit buses, and school buses.

GLENN: Oh.

STU: Funding $1 billion. Okay?

So a billion dollars.

GLENN: That's nothing.

STU: Now, let's just take that entire program, and dump it all into electric school buses for a second.

So we'll skip the regular buses. The other transit, the trucks, the commercial vehicles. We'll skip all of that.

Just say, it all went to electric school buses. Because it's obviously the biggest part of this bill -- we could buy 2,857 school buses, because each one costs between 3 and 400,000 dollars each.

Okay?

So --

GLENN: So we can buy it -- with a billion dollars, we can buy how many?

STU: 2,857 school buses --

GLENN: 2,000.

STU: Now, give me an over/under.

How many school buses do you think there are in America? Over 2,857, or under?

GLENN: It's going to be close, but I think it's over.

STU: Right. It's over, you're right. Yes, there's 500,000 school buses.

GLENN: Wow.

STU: So for 2,857 of them, you just have to spend a billion dollars. You have to spend a little more to get to all of them.

But let's look at this in context now. There's a little announcement, came out last week. No one noticed it. No one paid attention to this announcement at all.

It came out with headlines, like China vows -- boosts domestic energy supplies, step up risk control.

That was like one of the headlines. You're going to read that article? And click on that? Is that click bait? Not click bait.

So let me just give you a quick outline of what they said. The ruling party, the Communist Party aims for any coal production to rise to 4.6 billion tons in 2025, the deputy director of the cabinet's National Energy Administration, Ren Jingdong, said.

GLENN: Love him.

STU: I love Ren Jingdong.

GLENN: Have you read all of Jingdong's -- have you read all of his books?

STU: He's my favorite Jingdong. Ren Jingdong.

GLENN: Love him.

STU: That might be Kylo Ren's last name.

GLENN: No. He's actually the iconic image used for Ren and Stippy.

STU: Really? I did not know that. Anyway, up 12 percent.

That's your big headline. Did anyone pay attention to that?

So that was just one part of one announcement. But what he just said was just the increase -- not the whole amount of gold. Not at all.

Just the increase, in the use of coal, not all fossil fuels.

GLENN: Right. Just coal.

STU: Just coal.

GLENN: Got it. Got it.

STU: Is enough to wipe out the emission savings from the most important part, of the most important climate bill, ever, ever.

By quite a bit. Remember, we spent months talking about this, at the top of every single news broadcast. Right?

This is the Maos important climate bill ever. Just the increase -- again, just the increase, is enough to cause more than 20,000 times -- as many emissions, as the most important part of the most important bill ever. 20,000 times.

That -- that thing that no one mentioned on the news. That no one cared about. That little announcement. 20,000 times as much, as the electric school bus thing. Now, let's just say we can go crazy.

And let's say we can burn every single school bus. The whole 500,000. We do it all. That would cost us $175 billion at least, but let's just say we do it anyway. Some other environmental concerns go along with that. We can get into that another time.

But just that, just this little announcement, about this one type of fuel. In this one country, one time, is enough to wipe out all the school buses in America going electric, 119 times over.

In fact, let's go a little more relatable here. Think of the SUV. We have to take our SUVs off the road. Got to get our SUVs off the road. Let's go to one of the most popular SUVs ever. The Ford Explorer. Now, just this one announcement, from this one country, about this one -- not all fossil fuels. About just the increase of this one kind of fossil fuel.

Would be the same, the equivalent of adding 96 million 437,228 Ford explorers to the world.

Now, that's a problem. Because it's 29 times more than they've ever produced.

So it might be a tad problematic to do that. Imagine the traffic issues.

GLENN: But you're saying there's a chance.

STU: No. Just this one announcement.

From this one country, about this one fossil fuel. Is the equivalent of 82 percent of all vehicles on the road in the United States.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

STU: No one -- if they cared about globalling. If that was really the goal, wouldn't that lead every broadcast?

Because the issue here, Glenn. And the most important part of this is it's just from some random, evil dictator. Who just had his predecessor escorted out of a meeting, against his will.

And we have absolutely no control over him, in fact, you can make the point, be that recently, it seems he has a lot of control over us.

And so we could all --

GLENN: And every policy we're doing.

STU: Every policy we're doing.

GLENN: Weakens us, to make them stronger.

STU: Right. And, you know what, we can pass the biggest climate bill ever. And it gets completely wiped out, by one announcement. By President Xi, that nobody tells you about. And we have absolutely no control over.

You are changing your life, for that nonsense. It's all wiped out, immediately, and this happens every few years. They announce these increases. We don't even look at them. And it wipes out everything that we're doing. All the trillions of dollars.

All the money that we're spending. Giving people money to go buy a Tesla. Right?

All of that is completely inconsequential. He just wiped out 83 percent of all vehicles. If we took them off the road. We would be breaking even. Not just turning into electric vehicles, or hybrids, taking 82 percent of all the vehicles in the United States, off the road tomorrow, would just be the equivalent of what this guy announced, in some meeting the media didn't tell you about.

GLENN: So let me ask you: Are you willing to send your son or daughter, over to fight for something this flawed?

Because that is going to be -- in the winter, that's what they will say. They will say, look at. The people are starving. They're cold. Well, you know what is making them starving or cold?

Our policy on climate change. Our policy on oil. Our policy to get out of all fossil fuels. And anything that will make a cow fart.

They are changing absolutely everything, and your son or daughter is going to be asked to serve. And fight. You don't ship the 101st airborne over to the border of Ukraine, for no reason.

You're playing a very dangerous game. And I'm not hearing enough people talk about it.

There is no debate on this.

And I don't know a single person who is in favor of war. But I'm telling you, this administration is in favor of war.

And, by the way, the Republicans can't do a damn thing about it.

They can't do anything about it, until January.

And it's all for nonsense. ESG. Everything that is happening in your life, in your business, is all happening because of this warped, anti-human philosophy. Everything that is happening in your kid's school, is happening because of this warped anti-human philosophy.

And the faster we wake up to it. The faster we will realize, that's evil. That's evil.

We're not fighting against, Yahoo even know if people recognize this.

Most of the people who are gluing themselves to a wall, after trying to destroy a priceless painting. They haven't even thought of any of that.

But the -- but the ideas behind it, are evil. And that's why they always strike out, in darkness.

Destroy, destroy, destroy. Pervert, pervert, pervert.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.