RADIOJuly 29, 2024

Trump Campaign Spox SLAMS FBI Suggestion That He Was Hit by Glass

In his congressional testimony, FBI Director Christopher Wray suggested that former president Donald Trump may have been hit with a glass shard, not a bullet. But Trump 2024 Deputy Communications Director Caroline Sunshine joins Glenn to reject this narrative – which even the New York Times has debunked. She also discusses whether Trump is a changed man after surviving the assassination attempt: “I think the bullet that grazed him may have changed the country more.” She also slams the media for “wasting time” arguing whether it was glass or a bullet when 2 things are clear: someone wanted to assassinate Trump and another American is dead. Caroline Sunshine further comments on the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle and whether Kamala Harris will actually be the Democrats’ presidential nominee.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: This is the Glenn Beck Program.

So the Secret Service is encouraging President Trump to stop with the outdoor rallies. I think that diminishes his rallies, and takes some of the oxygen out. But I'm not President Trump.

I wasn't just shot. And that has got to change people. So we're looking to see what he's going to decide. And how he's handling things, including Christopher Wray coming up, and testifying in front of Congress and saying, you know, we're not sure he was actually shot. We're not sure that was a bullet. Might have been glass, I guess from Kamala's glass ceiling that she broke. Or, you know, maybe it was shrapnel. No. Read the New York Times. It was a bullet. It is so insane how these conspiracy theories come from the left, and they just expand and expand and expand on them.

Caroline Sunshine is with us. She's the 2024 Deputy Communications Director for Donald Trump.

First of all, Caroline, how are you, the staff, and the president?

CAROLINE: Well, we are always better than Joe Biden, outside the hours of 10:00 and 4:00 p.m. I can tell you that.
(laughter)
Always.

But I guess it looks like the Democratic Party is trying to be unburdened by what has been, and have Joe step down. And would be the -- the selected, but not elected Kamala Harris at the top of the ticket.

GLENN: Yes. Yeah. Crazy.

CAROLINE: No, I laugh. Yeah. It is.

It's crazy. It's undemocratic is what it is. Like I said, selected, but not elected. It is crazy.

But you come on here in good spirits and laughing, because I have the honor of working for Donald J. Trump who is a man who after, you know, mere seconds after an assassin's bullet.

And it was a bullet, Glenn. As you just said, came within a millimeter of his life. This man then got to his seat and said, fight, fight, fight. And then went on to have a phenomenal week in Milwaukee, unifying the complete Republican Party behind him.

You just saw some clips released from the great phenomenal Bryson Dechambeau. I think getting to see some of President Trump's, you know, humorous side. So everybody is in very high spirits.

President Trump, I call him the great American warrior because I think Ronald Reagan was the great communicator, another US president, great US president, who had a brush with the assassin's bullet. But President Trump is the great American warrior. And as he said, you know, I'm going to talk about this once. I'm going to share it. Share it with candor as he did on the stage in Milwaukee, and then I will move on. And then I will get back to work. And that's exactly what he's done. And it's really inspiring to work for somebody. Such a remarkable leader. There's just few like him. Yeah.

GLENN: So everybody that I talked to, that at all liked Donald Trump, or thought that, you know, I'm thinking about voting for him. Everybody that I know, that talked to him. They saw him at the convention and said, he is a changed man. He is a different man.

And not in -- just I guess in his seriousness. The gravitas of it. Did the bullet change him?

CAROLINE: I've been asked this question a lot, again. It's a great question. I've been asked it a lot. I think the bullet that grazed him may have changed the country more.

And the reason I say that, is because I think when that bullet came within a millimeter of President Trump's life, the country realized, it's not him, then who? You know, if President Trump isn't in this arena, who is there to actually fight for a secure border and an economy where, I mean, people can actually have a chance at the American dream, let alone be able to go to the grocery store, and you buy three items, and all of a sudden you go, how is this $100?

And then more generally, I think, for the forgotten men and women of this country. Who prior to President Trump's arrival on the political scene, really had no authentic champion, and certainly not one of the caliber of Donald J. Trump.

So I think that is really what changed. I think it was a watershed moment for the country. I think it's one of those moments where everybody is going to look back and they will remember where they were standing and who they were with, when it happens.

But I also look as I said, the more remarkable, what President Trump survived is his reaction.

Who has that reaction? Within seconds of having a bullet come within a millimeter of your life, you're up on your feet with blood still on your face, very much still in clear and present danger.

And you get up and you say, fight, fight, fight! And I do think that President Trump is now in this unique category of people who I'm sure you know people like this, Glenn. Who have had a brush with death, there is a unique category of people, who have come right to that edge, of the thing that I think most of us fear, deep down. In a way. Which is death.

We believe in a life after this one. But death is a scary thing. And you watch this man, come within a millimeter of his life. Building face-to-face with death. Within seconds back on his feet. And also, back to work.

And I have a lot of reverence to the men and women in our military. And our veterans. And like a long history in our country, of, you know, I look at the stories of Medal of Honor recipients. Past and present.

You know, you just see the valor. The fight. You're in awe of an act like that. And I just think that this country is deserving of someone like President Trump, who had a brush with the assassin's bullet like he said. He's the man who took a bullet for democracy. And then ten days later, this man does not need to go retreat to Camp David for a week. Or take a nap for two years. Or whatever it is. This man is like, I'm ready to get back to work for you. You know.

GLENN: Caroline, so is he going to listen to the Secret Service?

Caroline.

CAROLINE: Yeah. We're really grateful for the Secret Service. And I want to say there's a distinction, right? Between the Secret Service leadership in Washington, DC. And, you know, the rank-and-file Secret Service agents, who do a phenomenal job protecting President Trump. Who give their -- who are quite willing to give their lives to President Trump. As you saw in Pennsylvania.

And, you know, there's been a lot of talk on outside, versus inside. Rallies. I would say this, it's the job of the Secret Service to protect president whether a rally is inside or outside. And President Trump in the past has held many rallies that are in your arena. He held many rallies that are outdoors. He just goes where the people go.

So we -- you know, we want these investigations to play out at the deep sea level.

Because, of course, the American people deserve answers.

We don't have time to be wasting, hearing Christopher Wray go through the semantics, of was it shrapnel? Was it a bullet?

It was an assassination attempt on a former US president's life. He's been examined by esteemed physician, Ronny Jackson. Great physician with President Trump's physician during his time in the White House. Excellent physician. He has examined it.

He's seen the reports. Seriously, I don't know why we're wasting time on that. When, by the way, it wasn't just an assassin's bullet that grazed President Trump. Corey Comperatore is dead.

His wife is left without a husband. His children are left without a father. We had multiple people injured.

And we're wasting time on shrapnel versus bullet? And, Glenn, I got to tell you. I can't believe I'm going to say this.

This is the first time in a long time I've heard AOC ask a question more intelligent than Christopher Wray, when she asked the question: Hey, you know, if you know that the standard AR-15 has a range of, you know, 500 yards, why isn't that factored into your perimeter calculations? But I was shocked.

GLENN: I know.

CAROLINE: The first time there's bipartisan consensus in Washington, DC, for the first time in a long time, as there should be. But anyway, like I said, President Trump, he just gets right back to work. And he's going to be headed back on the road. He's headed to Minnesota. He will be headed to Pennsylvania. He's back on the road. You know, it's sort of a rain or shine, indoor or outdoor type thing.

We're very grateful and confident for the men and women who served President Trump in the Secret Service.

And as President Trump has said, he's getting back to work. And so are the people. Because that's the other thing too, right? Glenn. Nobody should be afraid to attend a peaceful political rally in the United States of America.
Nobody should be afraid to do that.

Nobody should be afraid to lose their life at a peaceful political rally. And I know you've seen our rallies. Our rallies are extraordinary. There's just something special about them. There's something special about the energy.

GLENN: There is.

CAROLINE: There's something special about thousands of people who love our country coming together in one place. And I think, again, what was remarkable about president Trump's reaction, if you remember watching that thing back, when it happens in those first moments, the crowd understandably, terrified, ducking, afraid. That is a normal human reaction to have.

But the second President Trump gets back to his feet and says, fight, fight, fight, within five seconds of that bullet grazing -- coming within a millimeter of his life, that crowd was calm.

He actually -- likely, President Trump saved lives that day, with that reaction. It's likely that that reaction stopped, you know, a stampede.

GLENN: I will tell you. I will tell you that when I watched it. I saw it live.

And when -- when he went down, I mean, a lump went to my throat immediately. And -- because I knew what was happening. And I thought, oh, my God, man. They've hit the president.

And I had that lump in my throat. And when he stood up, and I could hear him say, wait. Wait. Wait.

And he stood up, and then he looked over the shoulder of one of the agents and puts his arm out. I was crying for an entirely different reason.

That fast, it turned around in me. And it went from horror and shock, to mainstream pride and admiration. It was -- it was remarkable.

Caroline, tell me, how is he going to switch gears with Kamala? I'm sure he's not concerned about it. And does he believe that she's actually going to be the nominee?

CAROLINE: Well, as I said, you watch the Democratic Party, trying to be unburdened by what has been, and thinking that if they just do a little switcheroo here, you know, having Joe step down and putting Kamala up at the top of the ticket, that that somehow changes thing. But it doesn't. Because Joe Biden's record is Kamala Harris' record, and it's the Democrat Party's record. Look at her first few speeches. What is she saying?

How much she loves Joe. Joe has been so great. I mean, she's owning this, full force, and as I expect her to.

Nobody has had more of a front row seat to both Joe Biden's cognitive decline, and concealing that from the American people, than her, Kamala Harris.

But then look at her own words when she said, she was the last person in the room, when Joe Biden was executing his abysmal withdrawal of Afghanistan, that resulted in the lives of 13 US service members losing their lives. Joe Biden of course couldn't remember or acknowledge those on the debate stage.

The point is, she was -- she was the last person in the situation room. She's likely been the last person in the room for many of those positions.

But here's the thing, as much as Joe Biden's record is Kamala Harris' record. She's also dangerously liberal. You know this. She comes from the failed State of California. So this is a women, who if given the chance, would turn this country into California. She is the border czar, who has never been to the border.

We heard those reports. You have just seen, right? Of her current Border Patrol chief and former border patrol chief, both saying, yeah. We never got a phone call from her.

You know, she's never called. No. She's never called. Again, well, you know what has happened. Since she never called. We had almost 20 hill. Maybe more. Illegal immigrants come across our Southern border. We've had 30 tons of fentanyl. We've had 360 names off the terror watchlist come across our Southern border on her watch. That's enough fentanyl, by the way, to kill every American citizen multiple times over.

And she's not changing. She was just in Houston yesterday. That is a one hour flight. One hour commercial flight from the US border. Forty-five minutes if you fly private like her. Didn't go.

And that's not because of incompetence. That's because of negligence. She doesn't want to secure the border. If we don't have a border, we don't have a country. She doesn't want to secure the border. She wants to defund ICE. She's at the Border Patrol -- invokes scenes of slavery. This is not a woman who cares about law and order.

It's actually part of her worldview. She's far more left than Joe Biden on a lot of issues. She's dangerously liberal. She really more closely resembles Barack Obama than Joe Biden in many ways, in terms of policy and worldview.

GLENN: Caroline Sunshine, thank you so much. And my best to everybody on the team. We have been praying not only for the president and his family. But also everybody on the team. Stay safe. Thank you, Caroline.

CAROLINE: Thank you. Thank you.

GLENN: You bet. Thank you.

Female Veteran Says Pete Hegseth is RIGHT About Women in the Military

Congresswoman and Air Force veteran Anna Paulina Luna joins Glenn to clear up one of the Democrats' biggest lies about Trump’s Defense Secretary pick Pete Hegseth during his confirmation hearing: "Pete never said that he didn't want women to serve in the military. In fact, it's quite the opposite. But I have the same agreement in that there are certain roles that women SHOULD NOT be subjected to in the military." Plus, she discusses why she’s hopeful that the Trump administration will reveal the truth about UFOs and the mysterious New Jersey drones.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna from Florida. Welcome to the program. How are you?

ANNA: Hey, Glenn. Happy to be back on.

GLENN: Yeah, it's very good to talk to you. So you were in the Air Force?

ANNA: I was.

GLENN: And what did you do in the Air Force?
ANNA: I did air field management, and worked with actually my first installation, was the B-2 stealth bombers of flight plans, a lot of inspections, a lot of readings. Did not serve in combat.

However, I definitely have an opinion or two on women in combat.

GLENN: I would like to hear it.

ANNA: First of all, during the confirmation hearings. They were incredible.

And they were trying to walk them into these sound bites. The one thing I kept hearing from the Democrats was, they were taking his comments out of context, in regards to women in the military.

So Pete never said that he never wanted women to serve in the military. In fact, it's quite the opposite.

But I have the same agreement, in that there are certain rules that women should not be subjected to in the military. So in a lot of foreign countries, you will see there will be women-only sniper teams. And/or women-only teams that will see combat. Now, I preface this by saying, that there is a study that has been done. And shows that when women have been placed in harm's way. That the natural instinct for men was to protect that woman. And that's the right thing to do.

That's that, quote, unquote, toxic masculinity that the left tries to mess with all the time --

GLENN: That is human nature. We're born with that, but go ahead.

ANNA: Right?

And so when you have though, a woman that let's say, plays on a Special Forces team. They come under fire.

Hypothetically that woman gets hurt. Instead of focusing on the mission, as it would be, the men then would in turn, go to protect that woman.

And it could ultimately result in, A, more casualties, more people getting hurt, and then also jeopardize the success of the mission.

And so I think when we're looking at military policy as a whole, we need to take these things into consideration. But it's very easy because Pete is a white male. For them to try to demonize him and treat him as this anti-woman, you know, alcoholic womanizer, which is simply not the case.

Other thing, and the reason why I wanted to show my support for him. Was, look, Pete is a Christian. He has the Jerusalem cross tattooed on him.

That does not mean he's a Nazi. That does not mean he's a white nationalist. So what I've been telling reporters. If Pete was so anti-, you know, anti-minority.

Anti-, you know, anything to do what we stand for and value in this country, why would you have the same -- because they don't really have a response to us.

GLENN: Yeah. All right. So do you agree with him? Because I took from him yesterday, something else about the military. I have no problem with women in the military, with an exception of the natural order of things, where I think men -- I have to tell you, if -- if one of the guys was captured by, you know, al-Qaeda. I would do everything I can to make sure that one of the members of my team, you know, were safe. And I would do everything that we should do. However, it's different if I know that the woman member of our team, has just been captured.

I -- it takes on a different meaning to me. Because I know what's going to happen to her, in compared to Tom or Tim.

And I think that is a natural instinct, that you cannot get rid of. And you don't want to.

The second thing, that I think that Pete is talking about. And we saw this in the fire chief, in -- in Los Angeles.

Where she said, you know, I -- you know, I'll talk to people. They'll say, well, you can't lift my husband out of our burning house.

And her response was, well, you know, he got himself into a place he shouldn't be.

So why should I?

Okay. So that's ridiculous. As long as a woman can physically do exactly what is required of the male, then I don't have a problem with that. Do you agree with that?

ANNA: I would say, though, there's this aspect of psychology. And certain situations. Where I don't think women should be placed. So right now, what we're seeing, is -- you know, those are all great points, Glenn.

The military standards, currently. There are different standards for women and for men.

That's just a fact. But there are also different requirements for different jobs. Right?

If you can go in, for example, to be a fire firefighter, you're required to lift X amount, whether or not you're a man or a woman in the military.

But in that sense, I would say that, when you're talking about conditions where you're living in a field. When you're talking about conditions, when you know that there is going to be a psychological aspect and component. It doesn't mean that women aren't as good as men.

I think there's been cases, where women can be better snipers than men are.

Depending on what you're looking for job-wise.

What I will say, as far as my perspective is concerned.

I don't think women should be required to register for the draft.

I know that Senate Democrats were pushing that.

And I also think that women should not be placed in certain combat roles in the military.

GLENN: Agreed. Agreed. Agreed.

Let me switch topics with you.

You were one of the biggest advocates for the UAP. UFO disclosure.

Any updates on -- on that hearing, the updates on the New Jersey drones.

And were you able to get David Grusch into a skiff and get a classified briefing? And if so, what was your takeaway?

ANNA: So I was not able to get Grusch into a skiff. In fact, they were blocking that, by not re-activating his security clearance. And so I'm hopeful with the new incoming administration, especially because as of right now, you know, Marco Rubio led to his confirmation for Secretary of State.

GLENN: Yeah.

ANNA: And they have been in the Senate, one of the big advocates and supporters of looking into UAP's -- a/k/a, UFOs. And then everything else associated with that.

Now, what I will say, is that I've been grossly disappointed and disgusted by how the Biden administration handled what happened with the Chinese spy balloon, which to be clear is different than a UAP.

The fact is, some of these drones are likely tied to not just hobbyists. But probably more nefarious actors.

Even if we had that information, shared in the public. I don't believe that the Biden administration would have done that.

Because of how I saw, how they handled the drones.

In the United States. And collecting intelligence. Nonetheless.

It was a Chinese intelligence operation.

You know, I had one of my colleagues Van Drew, who actually made an admission on television, that it was adversarial drones. And then you saw the Intel community come out. But Van Drew would not just make something like that up.

So you're seeing kind of this rift occur with the intelligence community, and then people that do want the American people to simply know the case.

I think this is probably the topic of longer discussion. In regards to what a UAP is. What's interesting, Glenn. And I know you look at these things through a lens, as do I.

As a Christian, first and foremost. But what's interesting, when I was questioning Grusch.

I actually asked him, well, what would you consider, in so many words -- is this like a physical ST?

And he kept calling things inter-dimensional beings, if we're specifically referencing UAPs, and so I think that that just aligns in perspective, to think about this from.

I think there's a lot. You would have talked about this even ten years ago.

Your political career would have been over. People would have said you're a conspiracy theorist.

I can tell you, this is probably the number one question I get. No matter where I am at in the country, people come up. They appreciate it, because everyone is curious. So I'll leave you with that.

GLENN: So let me just -- let me just follow that here, just a little bit.

The inter-dimensional beings, that could be spiritual. That could be a quantum being. Any idea what he meant by that?

ANNA: You know, I actually tried to pull on his string. And he didn't want to go there.

And I can also tell you, when I was talking to him, with a group of other legislators on the phone, prior to the hearing.

That he did make the omission. That he was actually in fear of his life. And that something happened, where he tried to kill him.

So I don't know if that was associated. But he did not want to go into that any further.

And so based on my investigation. Based on what we're told in the hearing, I would say that it does not seem like it would be a good thing.

He gave me the impression. That this was nefarious.

So take it for what it's worth.

It's inter-dimensional.

I think quantum could be, you know,

GLENN: Right.

ANNA: We're on the same page there.

GLENN: So it is so bizarre that this kind of stuff is happening.

And we're not being told. Donald Trump said that he would talk about the drones. On Tuesday.

He said, give me a day, to get settled on office.

And he said, I'll find iota the drones. And I'll tell the American people.

If that's China. Should we know, the American people?

ANNA: I think it would be well within his wheelhouse.

And I think he wants the American people to start to trust their elected officials.

It goes to so much deeper than just have someone in the White House on your side. Right?

Because we know that -- and from what I've gathered, because remember, there's been bipartisan and bicameral meetings in the Senate, the House. And Democrats and Republicans have all been working on this together, to get some answers and information.

And there is a certain level of stovepiping that we've seen with information. And then also too, the aspect of, I as a sitting member of Congress. Who sits on oversight and foreign affairs, was denied access by a general at the Air Force base, to whom I responded. Who gives you the right and authority to tell a duly elected member and group of Congressmen, that they don't have access to a program that we write the damn checks for?

You have no authority to deny us access.

And so that conversation, probably not comfortable for that general.

GLENN: How did that end?

ANNA: Well, he left.

He actually got up in the middle of our meeting and went on TDY. Which any military member will tell you, never happened. He left the meeting.

He left the state.

He got up and left.

GLENN: Wow! Did you ever get an answer?

No. Representative Gaetz and Representative Burchett were also there to witness this.

I never seen that happen. And remember, I was in the military.

He literally got up and left in the middle of the meeting. Said he had orders in Georgia, and he never came back.

GLENN: Are you -- are you concerned at all about some of the conversations. We just saw another video from James O'Keefe.

Where he's talking to somebody who was -- I think he claimed to be in the FBI.

Said, he and others were meeting with generals. To make sure that they had a control on Donald Trump.

Are you -- are you confident at all, this time around, Donald Trump will be able to route that.

VOICE: Oh, most certainly.

And I will say, that has a lot to do with the confirmation of the Secretary of Defense.

You know, top down.

Last time president Trump was in office. I think there was a lot of trust in people, to do the right thing.

And then he realized that the Deep State was real.

And there were people running, regardless of whether he was a Republican. Or whether they're Republicans or not.

That they were working against his agenda. Because they didn't like what he stood for.

What we're finding, there is going to be a setup to go through these generals. That, A, discharge military members based on vaccinations. And boards.

The fact is, if you're a general and you're pushing wokeness ideologies.

Or you're trying to undermine subjective o the commander in chief, you have no place in the Department of Defense, period.

And so those people conspired, and I look forward to that. Because I can just tell you from a congressional perspective, Glenn. I actually had an amendment in the National Defense Authorization Act to remove DEI for military training.

And I have friends still in the military. So someone at Ramstein Air Base actually sent me an email of an officer there, that was directly undermining what we did. Congress has removed DEI.
So we're renaming it. Please, proceed with the training.

Guess what, that person is also going to be fired. And that's really how you're going to be at the DOD --

GLENN: Good. Good.

If you could hold for 60 seconds, I need to take a network break and come back. I want to ask you about Cuba. What the Biden administration just did. And also about Tulsi Gabbard. And how you feel about her and her nomination.

Back in just a second with Anna Paulina Luna, Representative from Florida.

Democrat Tries to TRAP Pete Hegseth. He Has the PERFECT Response

Donald Trump’s pick for Secretary of Defense, Fox News’ Pete Hegseth, sat in front of Congress for his confirmation hearing…and it exposed the Left for what they are. Democrats tried to corner Hegseth with lies and loaded questions, but he pushed back in a way that impressed Glenn. Glenn and Stu discuss some of the worst highlights, including when Rep. Mazie Hirono asked Hegseth if Trump plans to invade Greenland. Plus, the guys also discuss whether Hamas will release hostages before his inauguration.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So I don't know about you, Stu. But, boy, was I impressed with Congress yesterday, you know.

STU: They always find a way to make you think a little less about them. You know, they always can cross that line.

GLENN: Yeah. Mazie Hirono. What?

STU: Dumb. Well, she's America's dumbest senator. That's already confirmed. She won the competition with Ryan Seacrest hosting. And it was a great show, by the way. I would totally watch that.

GLENN: Yeah. Oh, I would watch that. Can you imagine the Jeopardy with the Senate and the House?

STU: Oh, my gosh. They asked them the tough question. They all ended up with zero. The winner gets zero.

You know, Mazie Hirono somehow wins. But she has $0. Everyone else has negative.

Right? I think they should have to pay the negative dollars to Ryan Seacrest. Gosh!

Okay. So here's one of the more incredible. Cut 15.

Here's Mazie Hirono on taking over Greenland. We have it?

VOICE: To take over Greenland, or an ally of Denmark.

VOICE: Senator, one of the things President Trump is so good at, is never strategically tipping his hand. And so I would never in this public forum, give one way or another, give -- in any context.

VOICE: That sounds to me, you would contemplate carrying out such an order to basically invade Greenland.

STU: Oh, does it? Oh, wow. You don't know what the English language really means, do you?

GLENN: Wow. And do you have a big sword? Because I think Secretary of Defense should have a big sword.

I like swords. How much do swords cost?

STU: And that was the smartest line of questioning.

GLENN: It really was. It really was.

How many tanks do we have? Do we have like just the ones I have on TV, or do we keep some of them secret, so we can surprise people with more tanks?

I want to know! Answer the question. My God.

STU: So bad.

GLENN: Are drones really just like big bees?

STU: They could be. They make noises like big bees, Mazie.

GLENN: Instead of missiles, have we thought about using Thor's Hammer? Because it would come right back to us.

STU: That's actually a pretty good idea.

GLENN: Can we get the space force to look into alien cows. I read online that alien cows are why we need stronger fences in Iowa. What's the Pentagon doing? Do you like nachos?

I mean --

STU: I would rather watch that. Whatever you just did. I would rather watch them doing that, than what actually occurred.

GLENN: I mean, those could have been questions yesterday.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: It was that insane.

Will you use the military to invade Greenland?

Do you like nachos?

Of course not!

Invade Greenland. Iceland, maybe. But not Greenland.

STU: No. Never. It's too big.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

STU: Of course. You know, it's funny. He says, he would never strategically tip his hand.

And it's funny, because Trump in a way, always tips his hand. Right?

He does want Greenland. He has tipped his hand. He has told us about it for years. He does want the border secure. He's told us about -- when it comes to specific things he's willing to do and not do in a negotiation. He'll suggest a bunch of stuff. But you don't know what's real. That's why he's a good negotiator.

GLENN: Right!

STU: You bring up that Tiffany example. You brought that up before. I was in the city. And I saw. I was telling my kids that story.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: And God only knows if it's true. You told it to me.

GLENN: I said to him. I said, you're negotiating gift is unbelievable.

I said, I've never questioned your negotiating power, since I heard the story about Trump Tower and Tiffany's. And he laughed, and he said, good for you, for knowing that story.

And I said, that is just incredible. That takes balls of steel.

STU: For people who don't know. Maybe you should give a 30-second version of it.

GLENN: So Tiffany was not going to sell him the air rights, so he could build the Trump Tower. He had already bought the property. It was either Tiffany's or Cartier.

So he goes to the board. And he says, look, I will build this -- it will be beautiful. It will be 70 stores.

And they're like, hmm. Well, we own the air rights, and we're not going to sell them to you, because we don't want a big building like that.

And he said, oh. You know what, I thought you might say that. I already own the property.

So if you don't, he rolled out architectural plans of what he described as the ugliest building he could possibly build. Three stories.

And he said, okay. Well, if you don't let me build the Trump Tower. I will build this.

No, you wouldn't. Watch this. And he left. By the time he had gotten back to the office, they had given him the air rights.

STU: That's who he is.

GLENN: That's who he is.

STU: Now, would he have built that building?

I think there are answers to that, in which he would have. Which is important.

GLENN: Yeah. That's also circumstances, where he would have just sold the property. You know what I mean?

And you don't know which.

STU: You don't know which. And that's why it works.

GLENN: Yes. Yes.

STU: So I don't think there's any chance. I don't believe there's any chance whatsoever, outside of like, I don't know.

China taking over Greenland first. Right?

Something like that, we might invade Greenland. I don't think there's any chance we just invade Greenland. However, first of all, I said I don't think there's any chance. There's some doubt even in my mind, that we might do it.

And that's why it works.

GLENN: Right! When he was like, hey, you know, the little missile guy.

You know, I will show you new missiles. That's why it works.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Because Kim Jong-un and everyone in the world went, is he willing to launch nukes against this guy?

Oh, I don't know. Maybe!

STU: Who knows? Maybe. Who knows! And like that's why it's successful.

It's why there's someone behind it.

GLENN: Yes. It's why the hostages are being released by 12 o'clock on Monday. Have you heard that?

STU: I've heard -- it's not confirmed, right?

GLENN: It's credible speculation.

STU: Okay. Because I know obviously. If you're -- if you're -- Donald Trump has been threatening it. He said, get it done before I come into office.

GLENN: Oh, yeah. Or there will be real consequences. And there will be.

We might take Greenland.

STU: Exactly. Think of the politics of this for a moment.

If you go back to Iran. Carter is leaving. The second Reagan takes over, they release the hostages, right? And everyone remembers it, exactly that way. Right?

Reagan essentially is responsible for that. They -- as soon as they came in. Two things, they didn't like Carter. And they were afraid of Reagan. And they were like, okay. We're out. And they leave the blackjack table.

Trump, I don't know. You know him better than I certainly was.

But in my view, Trump is smart enough.

First of all, number one, really wants the hostages out. Can't believe the way we handled this. So that's true. But also has thought about that historical precedent.

And he comes out. And he says, do it before I come in!

Which now, if they do it, before he comes in, it's not a Biden credit.

It is his!

And, of course, if they do it after that, it's always his.

He wins both ways.

GLENN: He is.

I mean, he has -- I'm telling you, I think he's the sharpest he's maybe ever been.

STU: Please don't.

I'm having PTSD after four years of hearing that about Biden.

Don't say he's sharp as a tack, please.

No. No. No. Just the best negotiator he may have ever been. Everything is a negotiation.

What he's doing with Pete Hegseth. All a negotiation!

How he's handling everything in the House and the Senate. All a negotiation.

He's a master negotiator. And the reason why he's so. Good at real estate negotiation.

Is because he knows it inside and out.

STU: Experience.

GLENN: He didn't know it, the first time.

STU: Yeah. And the first term was --

GLENN: All gut.

STU: Yeah. There's two things.

Like we -- have our -- it would be great to have someone outside of the system.

Who thinks about these things differently. And he had that part of it. But criticism of that, and this is played out in other realms before.

Where you say, well, the person. They don't know the system. They don't know the buttons to press, or Levers to pull. That -- especially at the beginning of his term. Really wasn't there.

He was learning it. Kind of his own -- he's even told that story before. Now he's in the position where he kind of has both. You know, he's an outsider and he knows the system. Which is a combination we haven't seen before. Because it's unique. It's not something that occurs a lot.

GLENN: No. Everyone goes in trying to use the system. He wants to shut the system down.

STU: That has to be a fascinating few years, man. We are going to have plenty to talk about. That, I can guarantee.

GLENN: Oh, I'm not tired of winning yet.

Are you tired of winning.

Let me give you -- let me take a quick break. And then we'll get back to Pete Hegseth. I have to tell you, we've had four huge ESG wins. Huge!

Like, it's over.

And I hate to say that, because they never surrender. They just morph. But the way they've been operating and what happened here in the last couple of days. It's over!

California Fire Chief Reveals BIG Issue with Federal Forest Agencies

It's not just California that needs to clean up its forests before more devastating fires break out. Orange County Fire Authority Chief Brian Fennessy tells Glenn that the United States Forest Service and the Department of the Interior BOTH need to clear more brush: "I've worked for both the USDA and USDI. Let's face it...we've got an unhealthy landscape out there. We need to start putting beneficial fire on the landscape.” But he warns that these agencies are losing firefighters FAST: “It doesn't matter how many millions or billions of dollars you throw at the problem if you don't have the people there to do the work."

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: As the gods of the copybook headings limp up to explain once more that fire will certainly burn us and water will wet us. They could learn that in California.

We have Brian Fennessy. He is the Orange County California fire chief.

To tell us a little bit about what's going on. And how is Orange County doing, Brian?

Welcome to the program.

BRIAN: Hey, thank you very much. You know, a little bit about the fires, just across from LA. You know, they're not spreading. As they were, I think both are kind of in a stable position. But there's certainly a lot of heat, you know, in those. And on those fires. In the new wind event approximately albeit. Not 80 miles an hour. One hundred-mile-an-hour gusts. Are still very concerning.

Those fires will be wind tested. Here in North Carolina, it's blowing hard. It was up last week. I think we here dodged a bullet.

But we're expecting that for another couple of days. I'm told there might be another Santa Anna wind event forecasted for next week. So we sure can't stand much more.

GLENN: So, Brian, this is totally predictable. Was it not?

BRIAN: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. When I started in 1978. We would usually have a few days notice.

You know, meteorology is not what it is today. We start to get notified about ten days out.
And then confidence builds at seven days.

And then when you're about four days out, we're pretty sure, you know, what's going to expect.

Yes. Forecasting predicting is far better than it's ever been.

GLENN: Right. So what should have been done in those four days before the fire broke out?

BRIAN: Well, I'll tell you what was done. And we have a program called prepositioning. About six years ago, the fire chiefs in the state, got the state of California to fund -- to put money behind this prepositioning meeting. If we go through a matrix, you know, county-by-county, and we meet certain criteria. I mean, there's a number of things. We are approved for prepositioning funding.

Which means, I can bring on additional aircraft, additional bulldozers, engines.

And the state will pay for them. So that not only are all my stations filled and ready to go.

But I might have two or three more strike teams, strike teams five engines. I might have additional helicopters, dispatch staff.

So all of the Southern California counties were approved for prepositioning. So we had definitely extra resources available, should they be needed.

And certainly, they were deployed very, very quickly.

GLENN: But that's Orange County.

BRIAN: No, that's every county -- every county of the state is eligible for it. But each county has to go through this matrix to meet it.

And so I don't know for sure. But I would expect that Santa Barbara county south, were all approved for prepositioning funding.

And, quite frankly, here in Orange County and when I was the fire chief in San Diego city, we didn't wait for prepositioning. If this weather was going to surface, we are going to staff up.

And if we go overbudget, we go overbudget.
Our job is to protect our communities. And the mayor I worked for at the time, understood that.

So it's nice to be reimbursed for it, but that's not a necessity. We are going to staff up, even beyond what the state approves, if we believe we need to do that.

GLENN: Right. Yeah.

So as we're watching this from Texas and all around the country, it seems as though, it was, A, known that it was going to happen. This is routine. You expect the Santa Anna winds, every year.

You expect forest fires.

And brushfires, in California. Every year.

So this was just one of the really bad ones.

Then it seems like incompetence of cutting the funding for the fire agencies. Not really, truly being prepared. And then on top of it, it seems incompetence to a level that is almost criminal.

And then the third part of this, as we see it, as I see it. Is there might be some actors after the main fire started, that are also, you know, setting fires. What they're -- what their motives are, are yet unknown.

There are also some arsonists involved in that.

Do I have that picture right?

VOICE: Partially. And maybe totally. I don't know for sure.

But I will tell you this. I live in -- I grew up in Altadena. That's one of the towns pretty well wiped out.

When you live that close to the foothills. You're used to Santa Anna winds.

You know they're coming, and they can be brutal right there in the foothills. And it's not uncommon for a strong -- we consider strong Santa Anna, forty or 50 mile an hour winds steady, with gusts maybe to 60, 70.

The event that was experienced last week. And you know this, was 60, 70, steady, gusts, 90 to 100. Something like that. We have a hard time dealing with the former.

Something like that. We're trying to manage expectations, as -- we can't stop that fire.

And I think that, you know, many times, you know, the public. Let me put it this way.

If this were a hurricane or a tornado. Firefighters aren't stopping those either.

GLENN: Right. But they do preposition.

You look at Florida. They've got the trucks lined up before that thing comes ashore.

BRIAN: Yep. They're the best. They get disaster preparations in advance. They get that moving. Florida is an amazing model.

And Texas is a good model as well.

But in terms of, I can't speak of LA city. I don't know what they're prepositioned or upstaffed. They could have another thousand engines. And we weren't going to stop this fire.

Now, having said that. Once the winds diminished. And the fire. This is no longer a wild land fire.

This became an urban conflagration.

House to house spread.

The fuel was structures.

And so, you know, once the wind diminished to a point where, you know, firefighters could get in there and start working on the structures.

There were just so many.

I mean, I drove those fires -- I've been doing this since 1978.

I couldn't believe the structures, the businesses, that were burning so far, from the mountain, that it came off of.

I mean, it was even incredible for me. In terms of the water. I think that's being sorted out. I'm probably hearing the same things that you are. The reservoirs may not have been as filled as they needed to be.

Yes. A draw in the system, can cause some decrease in pressure. But I've never heard of anything that -- where there actually wasn't pressure.

I do know. And I've shared this with people.

In 2003, in San Diego, at the time, the largest fire in California history. We lost pressure.

But that was because pump houses. Pump stations had been burned.

And we didn't know they existed. Had we known, we would have protected those pump houses, as much as we protect a house.

To ensure that we have pressure.

GLENN: Right.

BRIAN: So I'm confident in the city of LA, and I'm hearing the governor is ordering an investigation. That's going to get sorted out. That's going to get public.

And, yes, it could be quite embarrassing and life-changing for a few people, involved in whatever decision made by both parties.

GLENN: Good. Good. We have to learn from our lessons. You know, learn lessons from our mistakes.

BRIAN: Totally agree.

GLENN: You are being talked about going into the Department of Interior.

You had not heard that?

BRIAN: Oh! Well, I'm hearing rumblings. People asked if I was interested in perhaps even becoming the new US forest service chief. And I have served with others that should I be approached at some point. I would certainly consider it.

Because, quite frankly, that agency is a mess, when it comes to fire fighting.

GLENN: Yeah.

BRIAN: They -- you know, paying benefits for -- the firefighters are leaving in droves.

They are so underpaid and underbenefited, that they're leaving, you know, to go to work for state and local government agencies, like mine.

And like L.A. Counties. And this isn't anything new.

You know, I used to work for them, for 13 years. Both the USDA foresters, and the Department of Interior. BLM. And I left as a crew superintendent. And I ran crews. And back then, you know, we were significantly underpaid.

I left the municipal department in 1990. Went to San Diego, because of it. And it's gotten worse.

And it's not managed or organized like a fire department. And if they're going to be in the fire business, you know, they need to be organized and led like a fire department.

Yes, there are resource agency. And, yes, they have things beyond fire, but if you look at the forest service budget, primarily now, it's fire being funded.

GLENN: Sure.

BRIAN: And they definitely need some help in their firefighters. Quite frankly, Glenn, they will be without a fire department very, very soon.

GLENN: Jeez. I have to tell you, it was the national forest service that helped save my neighbor's ranch and probably mine. If we would have had high winds, it would have been over. But the local fire came out. And immediately, the forest service had already positioned.

Because they looked at my canyon and went. This is dry. This is just a disaster waiting to happen.

And they were ready for it.

And they saved it. They did a great job there.

BRIAN: They have amazing firefighters.

GLENN: Yeah. They do.

BRIAN: Spent 13 years in a hotshot group.

I know the business. And I know the people that are out there now. Their firefighters are amazing. Their smoke jumpers. Their hotshots. Their engine cruiser.

Unfortunately, you know, again, they're organized in such a way, that nationally.

They don't -- it would take too long to speak.

But it's just sad to see.

I mean, here in California, I'm told that they're -- we're only able to staff the stations at 60 percent. In my own county. I have three forest service stations.

And they can only staff one of those stations.

Two on occasion. Eight to ten all summer.

We had a fire. We had a fire.

The airport fire, earlier this summer. That burned 100 homes.

And the station closest to that fire was not staffed

And so, you know, I made Congress aware.

And others aware.

And right now, I don't think the forest service is happy with me.

Because I'm being very public about things they should be very public about.

GLENN: So would it be the forest service or the department of interior, that would be responsible for getting under brush cleared?

MIKHAIL: Well, I think it's both. I worked for both the USDA and the USDI.

And let's face it. At least out in the west, the firefighters for decades did such a great job, suppressing fires quickly. That it caused this growth.

And we had an unhealthy landscape out there. And we need to have beneficial fire back on the landscape.

Here's another thing, Glenn. The same firefighters that were losing, those are the people that were going to do the work.

GLENN: I know.

BRIAN: So if you don't have the workforce to do the work, that needs to be done. How will you get it done? It doesn't matter how many millions or billions of dollars you throw at the problem, if you don't have the people, there to do the work.

But, yes. I mean, we need to do something about this unhealthy -- and people are working hard at it.

Certainly, Cal fires are showing amazing, incredible success with it. But you're years behind them.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BRIAN: This is decades of not treating the fuels and the landscape. And it's going to be decades to fix it.

But we've got to do something. And we have to have a workforce to be able to do it. And like I say, if asked -- and I haven't been asked by anybody officially.

Jut informally. People have suggested and asked, is that something I would consider?

And absolutely.

And, you know, certainly, pay is less of an issue. It would be a pay cut for me. But it's not about that.

It's about -- it's about, you know, what we as firefighters, you know, have sworn to do, and we need to fix that organization.

GLENN: Quickly. Quickly. Can I ask you, am I up against a network break? Can I just ask you about the safety inspections about the Oregon fire trucks and everything.

That is not to make sure of the missions.
That's to make sure that we could function, correct?
Which seems insane too, but go ahead.

GLENN: You know, I'm unaware of what you're talking about.

I know we do expect. Not we. But the state or the feds will inspect, you know, engines or what not. When they arrive. And then before they leave to make sure they're safe.

So I'm not familiar at all, with the situation you're talking about.

GLENN: All right.

Brian, thank you so much.

I hope you're called up. Because we need to take all of our agencies.

And especially all of our services that are protecting us.

Seriously again, we haven't for a long time.

Brian, thank you so much.

BRIAN: Yep. We need change. So thank you.

GLENN: Yep. Brian Fennessy, orange County Fire Chief. All right

Why California Officials Shouldn’t Get a DIME of Wildfire Aid Without MAJOR Conditions

House Speaker Mike Johnson has caused some controversy by suggesting that any wildfire aid given to California MUST come with conditions. But should this be controversial … or common sense? Glenn reviews 3 reasons that the Californian government shouldn’t receive a DIME from U.S. taxpayers without major restrictions. If the REAL “science deniers” like Governor Gavin Newsom can’t admit that their own policies helped fuel this disaster, Glenn argues that we can’t trust them with our money. California was warned days before the fires that conditions could cause a blaze. And there are fires in the state EVERY year. So, why wasn’t California prepared?

If you would like to help the PEOPLE - not the government - of California, you can donate at https://MercuryOne.org

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: But let me go into first, what is happening in California. The fires are still burning.

And, you know, good for them. Good for them.

Meanwhile, we have Newsom, talking about his marshal plan to rebuild Los Angeles, and let's go to cut three there, please.

VOICE: Over the course of the next several years in Los Angeles, will be hosts to the World Cup, and then the Super Bowl. And then the Olympics.

With this rebuilding effort, needing to take place, is LA going to be ready for all those global events?

VOICE: All that opportunity, that pride and spirit, that comes from not just hosting those three iconic games, but also the opportunity I think to rebuild at the same time. And that's why we're already organizing a marshal plan.

We're already looking at a team, looking to reimagine LA 2.0. And we're making sure everyone is included, not just folks on the coast.

People here, that were ravaged by this disaster.

VOICE: You just said, you're organizing a marshal plan for the rebuilding of California. What is that marshal plan? Tell us about this marshal plan.

VOICE: We're starting to lay out.

We're still fighting these fires. We're already talking to city leaders. We're already talking to civic leaders. We're already talking to business leaders. Nonprofits.

We're talking to labor leaders.

We're starting to organize, how we can put together a collection of individuals on philanthropy on recovery.

How we can organize the region. How we can make sure that we are seeking federal assistance, for the Olympics more broadly.

But also federal assistance for the recovery efforts, and how we can galvanize the community.

GLENN: Okay.

So I'm glad he's talking about the future. This brings us to Mike Johnson.

Something that I haven't talked about. Haven't had a chance to talk about yet. He wants to put some restrictions. His aid proposal for California. Is that he's trying to put conditions on the aid sent to California. And people are saying, that's insane! You don't do that. Where is your compassion?

I want to talk to you about how compassion is sometimes difficult.

Compassion. True compassion is sometimes the hardest thing to muster.

Because you want to give, until you can't give anymore.

You want to help.

You want to be there. But you have an alcoholic. In California.

California is the political system is an alcoholic.

And it is destroying the entire state. And you don't say when an alcoholic is suddenly, you know, in the hospital, or, you know, really, really down, and, you know, out on the streets. You know what, I'm going to give you all the need to get back into your house. Because the alcoholic will spend that, and just end up in the same place, if not worse. Sometimes, you have to have tough love. You know this with your family. Any kind of aid, that goes to California, I think it is only responsible to aid the people, as quickly as possible. Aid the homeowners, as quickly as possible. Help them make sure that they have a place to go. Make sure that they -- like the government wasn't doing in North Carolina. Making sure that they have hotel rooms for as long as they need them, within reason. Now, within reason, many of these people are wildly wealthy. Some are very poor. There needs to be some understanding that the wildly wealthy. You know, we're not going to put you up at the Beverly Hills Hotel. That's just the way it is. Sorry.

But we're going to help the people. But when it comes to the state, if they cannot admit that this is not climate change, that this happened because of their policies. If they cannot admit that, they shouldn't get a dime.

I'm a taxpayer. I want to help California. Just like I want to help all the other states, when they have a problem, that they cannot handle. That is too big for their state.

But they took all of their resources. And honestly, you could make the case. I'm not. But you could make the case, this was intentional sabotage. Pragmatism now, I want to tell you about the three-fold problem in California, as I see it.

There are three things that are happening in California.

One, the Santa Anna winds, low humidity, and uncleared brush always causes fires. Always.

They are known to cause fires. They have been known throughout history.

Do you know why the great redwoods and the sequoias have grown for a thousand years? Do you know how those trees got so big? They're in California. How is that possible? How have they not been wiped out by fire?

We have to protect the sequoias. To an the sap in sequoias is fire retardant. That's why they can grow for a thousand years. God gave them.

God knew, there would be fires in California. Those trees have fire retardant as part of their life's blood. That's why they haven't burned down over and over and over again.

Normal trees don't have that. That's why fires burn all the time. And if you don't have regular maintenance on your forests and on your property, you are going to have a brush fire. And a brush fire turns into a forest fire.

And if you add 75 to 100-mile-an-hour winds. You could burn down the entire state!

Except, it seems for the sequoias and the redwoods. What this government of California has done, has stopped people in the name of the good of the forest and the good of the land, is to deny science. They have been denying science, for decades! They have been playing God for over a century!

They want to tell you, that a woman can be a man, and a man can be a woman, and a man can have a baby!

That's not true! That's denying science!

To say, that we can prevent the forest fires is a lie. That is as arrogant as saying, we can change the weather!

Now, don't think our government and governments all over the world, aren't trying to change the weather.

But let me ask you honestly. How do you think that's going to work out in the end?

How do you think cloud seating and putting gases and different things up into the atmosphere, or giant shades in space, to block the sun.

How do you think that's going to work out in the end?

Well, or will it end the same way our arrogance always ends?

There are things that we can do.

To mitigate natural occurrences.

For instance, if you were -- let's say, you got on December 2nd.

Can we get that weather warning up from the National Weather Service. It's January second, next Tuesday through Thursday. January 7th through the ninth.

A chance of moderate, to strong Santa Anna winds.

This is for -- is from the National Weather Service. Ready, set, go.

Readyforwildfire.org. Impacts. Extreme fire growth behavior possible, if a fire starts and power outages. Use extra caution with potential fire sources.

Now, this was added the week before the fires!

Now, that's the National Weather Service, giving a warning to the people of California. You can bet, that government agency, let other government agencies know, at the same time.

Continually didn't go up to your house.

It went out to everybody's house.

It went to the firehouses. It went to the governor's house. It went to the mayor's house. They knew in advance!

So let me ask you, in a nonprogressive state, what would somebody like Ron DeSantis do? What do we do for hurricanes? Hurricanes are like fires in California. You know you're going to have them, every single year. Am I wrong?

Okay. If you have them and you get a warning, one is potentially coming, that could be record-setting. What do you do? Well, I'll tell you what a nonprogressive state like Florida, with a governor who is -- is embracing reality. What he does, is he prepositions all of the utility trucks. Prepositions all of the lifesaving trucks. He makes sure that we have plenty of chainsaws. He makes sure that the -- the state is ready and literally waiting. So what should Gavin Newsom have done? When he got that warning, 100-year warning of a fire. He should have said, make sure all the reservoirs are full. Make sure that we have all of the fire trucks. Positioned. Put them in the high-risk areas. Just let them sit there. Have the firemen sit there in really dangerous areas. Make sure that if you see a fire or smoke, that thing is out right away. You can't get up these hills with fire equipment quickly. If you've ever been to California. It's honestly, like navigating the Appalachia. It's like going to North Carolina. Why? Were so many people trapped? Because it's impossible to navigate those hills and those mountains quickly! The same thing in California. Did they do that? No. Do they make sure that they had things in advance? No!

What is the one given if you're living in California? What is the one thing that you know is going to happen in California, besides political insanity. You know there's a chance of an earthquake? So what do you do? You build your building stronger, right? You know there's a chance of a mudslide. So what do you do? You make sure that you -- you have your foundations deep. But then you also, when you buy it, know, I'm gasping here. My house could slide down the side of this mountain. You're charged extra for insurance. But the one thing you know is going to happen every year, is fire. Why wouldn't California be the number one fire ready and resistant area in the United States? I'll tell you with why, in 60 seconds. Let me tell you about JASE Medical.

It's kind of been a terrifying past several months. At least when it comes to summer blockbuster level disasters from wildfires to hurricanes, sea to shining sea.

We've witnessed the danger that nature and mismanagement can bring. How many times last year and this year, so far have people been stranded without access to medications that they might need?

That doesn't have to be your family, or you. Because you know about it. And hopefully, you have the JASE case, by now.

It is a simple, reliable, emergency room supply. Of lifesaving medications to put control in your hands.

There's no way to prepare for literally every single thing that could go on.

But there's lots of ways to prepare for everything that you know could go wrong. The JASE case is a must have for that! This isn't about fear. It's about responsibility.

Being prepared, California, is the best way to protect your family and your future.

Don't wait for the next headline to wake you up. Don't wait for the government to do the right thing. You do it! Go to JASE.com. Enter the promo code Beck. Make sure you have the right medicine on hand the moment you need them. That's JASE.com. Promo code Beck. Ten-second station ID.
(music)
Okay. So I think there are three things happening in California, and this is why we're having this conversation today. And we're having to make tough decisions.

One, fires are natural, especially in California. They're going to happen due to global warming or not. When you have out of control homeless problems, your risk of fire increases. Why?

Because people who take meth, one of the side effects is, you like to see things burn. Also, you have homeless people, who start fires, maybe to stay warm.

Maybe just to eat.

But when you have huge homeless problems, your risk of fire goes up. You also have the Santa Anna winds. And the natural history of California.

They were unprepared. That's number two. Number one is, it's going to happen.

Any moron could see this happen. This wasn't 9/11 where, wow! We never thought planes could fly into the buildings. This is a wildfire in California!

It happens every year, just like the sun comes up every morning. Two, they were not prepared. They knew it was going to happen. They were not prepared.

Okay. Next thing: Their incompetence is borderline criminal. What they've done, not just in their incompetence, but by shifting funds away from fires. Away from preparedness. For something you knew that was going to happen, to I don't know.

To give more job opportunities for equal opportunity for lesbian lizard cults. By doing that and taking money away from the state, I'm sorry.

That's not just incompetence. That's borderline criminal. And, three, you have people who are now just joining in! What a surprise!

It looks as though, you have foreigners, here illegally, on our streets! Setting fires!
Who could have seen that one coming?

That's what's happening, in California it's natural!

It happens every year. They didn't prepare. They went the opposite direction. You have people joining in to help.

Now, I believe this fire started naturally. And then it's been helped by forces that I don't understand yet.

I don't know if this was a plot. Or just, you know, lone wolves, setting fires.

But also, nature helped by Santa Anna winds. Which he with understand.

And the incompetence.

Why would we give California a dime, without restrictions?

I'm not talking about the people, who are suffering right now, and have no money, and no place to go.

I'm talking about rebuilding in California.

Every dollar should have restrictions on it, to the government of California. Because I'm not paying for this twice. I'm not doing it!

They need to learn their lesson. Not the people.

The people in government.