RADIOApril 08, 2024

The TRUTH About Gen Z's "Entitlement"

Gen Z gets a bad rap as entitled, lazy, and whiny. But is that true, or should we listen to their complaints about things like 9-to-5 jobs? Glenn gives his message to Gen Z: Yes, your life is hard…because you’ve been lied to by a government that just wants more power, no matter how it affects you. Something is very wrong in America when you are working all day and still can’t pay your bills, or when you were told to spend a fortune on a degree that ends up being worthless. But the solution isn’t more government handouts. In fact, that’s a big part of the problem.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me speak to Gen Zers here.

I can't imagine what you're going through.

I -- I would hate to be in your position.

When I was your age, we didn't have to deal with any of this stuff. Your life has been tough. And at the same time, in comparison, your life has been very easy. And what I say, what I mean by that is, your early life as a child, was -- was very easy, in some ways. Because everybody was rushing to, you know, save you, protect you. Et cetera, et cetera.

Which makes your life harder now.

You know, when we fell down, and went boom, you know. Our parents were like, oh, look who is -- look whose head just went boom. And they knew that would help us not cry. Right now, your parents have mostly been involved in everything. Your counselors at the schools have been involved in everything. And everybody is making sure that you feel great all the time.

Which doesn't make you feel great. You've grown up with social media, doesn't make you feel great. You have grown up with literally the definition of narcissism, somebody gazing into the pond, looking at themselves all the time.

You've had that, and -- and this system of -- of a self-facing cell phone has -- and I don't mean this as an offense. Because everybody has experienced this. This is not just Gen Zers. But we've become narcissists. And it's all about me, me, me, me.

So you've already navigated landscape, that we didn't have to. You navigated landscape where nothing is true. And you don't trust anybody.

I wouldn't either. I don't, anymore.

But life is worth it, that's the first thing.

Life is really tough, really tough.

But it is worth it. In the end.

But life is not about stuff.

And as -- as a guy who is kind of a pack rat, I can tell you that none of that stuff will create happiness in your life.

And I think your generation has a better handle on happiness. In some ways. Than anybody in my generation. You're starting to realize, that, hey, pharmaceuticals, maybe not as good as natural. The big, huge house, maybe not as-needed as just having a smaller house, and then living your life, instead of having to work all the time and never going to experience it. My friends always say, Glenn, you've worked your whole life. You should go travel the world. I can't. I can't. Because I'm working.

And so I think you have a better balance, at least on what you want. However, there are some things that you have now been brought up to believe that are true, that are not true.

For instance, DEI and -- and CRT. And all of this crap.

You know, reimagining the police.

There are bad police out there.

There are. But when you -- when you reimagine the police, in a way where no police officers want to work in your at the, you get looters and squatters.

And riots.

And that feeds on I need to say. Especially when your politicians convince you that the right thing to do is to show compassion, and say, oh, well, wait a minute. Maybe they were deranged in some way or another. And so we're not going to put any of these people in jail. Or hold them.

And they commit crime after crime after crime.

And it becomes organized crime. That's what's happening. And somebody has to pay for that.

So when your Walgreens goes out of business, in your neighborhood.

It's harder on you.

When -- when they have to pay more for insurance, because people keep robbing them, well, then everything in that store goes up in price.

When politicians convince you, that minimum wage should be $25 an hour. Or I've heard 50, lately.

That means, the price of your hamburger and everything else, is going to go up. And so it affects you. Who pays for these things?

Actions, by politicians, have consequences.

You can't afford health care?

You can't afford a house? You can't really afford really even food? I understand.

And that is real. And it shouldn't be that way. But give me five minutes, and perhaps you'll look at it, in a different way. So we can fix it, together.

Look, picking a real estate agent, out of the hat, is not a good deal. You really need to know who they are. What they've done. What they stand for. What the business practices they are. Are they the best business practices?

What is their marketing campaign like? Do they have people already looking for a house like yours?

Because they have a good marketing campaign. If -- if you don't know to ask these questions. And most people don't. You're going to have somebody like you're just picking a name out of the hat, for your real estate agent.

GLENN: I want to continue our conversation with Gen Zers that feel like it's not worth even trying to go to work, because you'll never get anywhere. You can't afford.

I work full-time, 40-hour week. You still can't afford a place to live. You're still living with your parents. You can't afford food.

And I think they're right to feel this way. That wasn't always the case. But I want them to know, that I blame a lot of it on the hippies. And that may be wrong, but I hate hippies. Hippies have been screwing things up since the 1960s.

And they have been on this socialist march, and they have become everything that they said, they sacrificed back in the 1960s.

They have been liars and politicians.

And they have become greedy for themselves.

And they just won't let go, their time has passed. But these are the people, that have come up with all of these policies, that now, you feel like this is the way the world is.

It doesn't have to be this way.

And I was talking about crime. Looters. Squatters. Riots.

Somebody has to pay for that.

Actions have consequences.

Votes have consequences.

You say, you can't afford health care. I understand that. That's crazy!

Crazy!

My own company used to provide the best health care insurance, in all of New York City, and New York State. At one point, after Obamacare passed, they were taxing us, you know, Cadillac tax taxes. I was the only company, that still carried that, until the insurance company stopped carrying it. Why? Since Obamacare passed, health care costs have gone up 55 percent for the average premium. That's without inflation figured in. 13,000, to 21,000.

But that's just from 2013 to 2020. That doesn't include the last three years. Since Biden has entered office, it's up again, from 21,000, to $24,000 a year.

That is an increase of 80 percent. But you have to remember, politicians promised that if we passed this big government program, it would mean a savings of $2,500 per family.

I -- I mean, you're in school. You know.

2,500-dollar savings is not the same as an 80 percent increase. Hospitals, your hospital stay? Is up to 210 percent.

I understand, you can't afford. I can't afford health care. At these costs.

Who can afford health care?

Who can afford insurance?

You also are starting your life thousands of dollars in debt.

Your parents didn't have to have that. They didn't.

I could take a job, and work a job, to pay for your college, as you went.

You can't do that now.

When they took out, their loans, most likely the government wasn't behind their loans. Once that happened, once the government said, you know what, we're going to guarantee all the loans. Once that happened, like health care, the cost of going to a university skyrocketed. And it hasn't stopped. In 1965, it was Lyndon B. Johnson who said, we're going to just guarantee.

We're going to guarantee everybody's college. Don't worry about it, we will help you with the loan.

Well, once the government guaranteed it, universities found, well, we can just charge more. And they have been charging more and more.

In 1965. It was $450 a year, to go to college. Now, let's change with inflation. With inflation, that's $4,000 a year.

You're currently paying on the average, $26,000 a year. As opposed to inflation-adjusted 4,000. What happened?

What happened? By the way, books, the cost of books, up 155 percent.

Gas, gas is up. Why?

Government regulations. Can't afford a house?

Well, that's due to several things. Many of them revolve around the fed and our debt. Look, you have been fed lies, probably your whole life, and your parents just realized it, during COVID.

Okay?

There's something called common sense. And hopefully, you have it. Hopefully, it hasn't been beaten out of you, in this -- in these -- indoctrination camps we call schools.

The US government has run a debt. And we have been concerned about it forever. But they haven't been listening to your mom and dad, and people like me. They haven't been listening. And a lot of people just thought, oh, well. We could get away with it. And somehow or another, it will all work out.

And many of us have been saying, no. We can't pass this on to our children.

And you're now seeing, what we have passed on. So when you say, generation Z, that, you know, this is -- the adults. You created this world. In some ways, yeah. You're right. You're right.

We were lied to, and as many people do, they want to believe the lie.

Because it makes them feel better. Quite honestly, it's -- it's what's happening in your generation with, that's a female. When it's not.

It's a male. And he feels like a -- a female. He wants to be a female. But it makes us feel better to go along with the lie. Because we don't want to hurt his feelings.

It's the same thing that happened, except this was with money. We wanted to believe that we could spend all this money. Because honestly, it would provide you, our children, with a better life.

And when anybody said, wait. We will to have pay this off.

This will cost them.

We never saw the consequence, and it was always way out in the future. Nobody wanted to listen to the doomsday people saying, no. It's going to come faster than you think.

And that time is right now. Our government now, is printing 1 trillion dollars every 100 days. It's never been done. We have more debt than any country has ever had. In the history of the world.

But we're not alone.

Every country is -- is doing this.

They're going into debt, like we've never seen before. And we're all about to pay for that. And it's going to make your life even harder.

That's why, real, true constitutional conservatives, okay?

And you have to -- you have to understand, that everything is being -- is being cut into refractions now.

There are Marxists, and there are decent Democrats, that still believe in the Constitution, and the rule of law.

There are Republicans, that still believe in spending all kinds of money.

Getting us involved in every war around.

And then there are constitutional conservatives. That believe that we should conserve the things that have worked. Throw out the things that don't work.

But we can only do those things that are allowed by our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. You haven't really learned about those, most likely.

But you should. Because all of our -- all of our problems, are caused by government. And the people, supporting a government, that will do things, that are want in our Constitution.

But that's what this election is really all about.

And you might say, I don't really care.

I don't really care. I don't like either of them.

I know a lot of people, don't like either of them.
But one is going to try to cut the size of this government down. Which is causing the problems.

All of these programs. All of the things, that we've said we have wanted. You know, your parents can't retire now.

You know, you have the opportunity, that they didn't. They were promised. I was promised, that we could retire at 65. And we would get Social Security. And we could live off that.

There's no way you could live off that. You, if you look at the bright side, you're paying for Social Security now.

But at least you know, you're never going to get it. I'm probably the first generation, that knows, we're not going to get it. We're not, it was a lie.

But all of the people that are older than I am, they didn't necessarily know it was a lie.

And now, they're stuck. And I know people think about retirement. But honestly, especially for guys, if you retire, you generally die. There is no such thing as retirement. That doesn't mean you stay in the same job, doing the same things.

But you -- you work. You work. It's something. Something that drives you maybe if you're lucky, by the time you're older.

But man is meant to work. We have to find a way, to keep the people who have been raping this country and our Treasury for so many years, away from you.

Because if they teach you, like they taught us, that all of this stuff will work. You're only going to see much, much more pain.

So we have to try to protect you, so you can do your things, while we, my generation stands between you, and the older generation. That just have raped, robbed, and pillaged through their hippie policies. We say, stand back. Enough is enough. Enough is enough.

Let go. My generation should not be the one that takes the power now. Really, the younger generation. Thirty, 40 years old.

They're the ones. Because they will have to live with it, a lot longer than I am.

And the people who created it, cannot fix it. But it can be fixed.

You just have to learn enough about the truth, about why this has happened to us. Why did we make it for so long? Longer -- this Constitution lasted longer than any other Constitution in the world.

The average is 17 years. This thing has lasted hundreds of years. Why?

How?

And why is it falling apart today?

That's what you should dedicate some of your time to figuring out today.

Not just complaining.

You can complain.

I complain. Everybody complains. But learn what caused this. And if you end up thinking that Marxism is the solution. More collectivism is the solution.

Then you haven't done enough homework in the past.

Because that always ends the same way.

And the way that starts at the end. Is exactly what we're going through right now.

EXPOSED: Tim Walz's shocking ties to radical Muslim cleric

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is directly connected in more ways than one to a radical Muslim cleric named Asad Zaman. Zaman's history and ties are despicable, and despite Walz's efforts to dismiss his connection to Zaman, the proof is undeniable. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to connect the dots on this relationship.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Glenn Beck Exposes TERRORIST SYMPATHIZERS Infiltrating the Democrat Party

Is there a sinister GOP plan to SELL national parks?

Is Sen. Mike Lee pushing a sinister plan to sell our national parks and build “affordable housing” on them? Glenn Beck fact checks this claim and explains why Sen. Lee’s plan to sell 3 million acres of federal land is actually pro-freedom.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me give you a couple of things, from people I generally respect.

Chris Rufo, I really respect.

I'm totally against selling this land.

Nobody is going to build affordable housing deep in the Olympic Peninsula, which is one of the most beautiful places in the country.

I agree, it's in Washington State. It's on the coast. And it's a rain forest.

I want my kids hiking, fishing, and camping on those lands, not selling them off for some tax credit scam. This is a question I want to ask Mike Lee about.

That's really good. Matt Walsh chimes in, I'm very opposed to the plan. The biggest environmentalist in the country are and always have been, conservatives who like to hunt and fish.

We don't just call ourselves environmentalists, because the label has too much baggage.

And the practice always just means communist. Really, we are naturalists in the tradition of Teddy Roosevelt, and that's why most of us hate the idea of selling off federal lands to build affordable housing or whatever. I want to get to affordable housing here in a second.

Preserving nature is important. It's a shame we haven't -- that we've allowed conservation to become so left-wing coated. It never was historically.

No, and it still isn't.

You're right about one thing, Matt. We are the best conservatives. We actually live in these places. We use these places. We respect the animals. We respect the land. We know how the circle of life works. So I agree with you on that.

But affordable housing. Why do you say affordable housing or whatever?

Are you afraid those will be black people? I'm just playing devil's advocate? Are you just afraid of black people? You don't want any poor people in your neighborhood or your forest?

That's not what they mean by affordable housing.

And I know that's not what you mean either.

But what -- what we mean by affordable housing is, if you take a look at the percentage of land that is owned in some of these states. You can't live in a house, in some of these states, you know. Close to anything, for, you know, less than a million dollars. Because there's no land!

There's plenty of land all around.

Some of it. Let's just talk about Utah.

Some of it is like the surface of the moon!

But no. No. No.

Not going to hunt and fish on the surface of the moon. But we can't have you live anywhere.

I mean, you have to open up -- there is a balance between people and the planet. And I'm sorry. But when you're talked about one half of 1 percent, and we're not talking about Yellowstone.

You know, we're not. Benji Backer, the Daily Caller, he says, the United States is attempting to sell off three million acres of public land, that will be used for housing development through the addition of the spending bill.

This is a small provision to the big, beautiful bill that would put land in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado. Idaho. New Mexico. Oregon. Utah. Washington, and Wyoming at risk.

Without so much as a full and fair debate by members of both sides of the political aisle.

You know, I talked -- I'll talk to him about this.

The irony is, the edition of this provision by Republican-led Senate goes entirely against conservation legacy of a conservation. President Trump made a promise to revive this legacy.

Yada. Yada. Yada.

More about Teddy Roosevelt.

Then let me give you this one from Lomez. Is Mike Lee part of a sinister plan to sell off federal land?

This plan to sell off public lands is a terrible proposal that doesn't make any sense under our present circumstances and would be a colossal political blunder. But I'll try to be fair to base Mike Lee.

And at least have him explain where this is all coming from.

Okay. I will have him do that in about 30 minutes.

Let me give you just my perspective on this.

I'm from the West. I love the west.

I don't hike myself.

I think there's about 80 percent of the people who say, I just love to hike. And they don't love to hike. They never go outside.

I'm at least willing to admit. I don't like to hike. But I love the land. I live in a canyon now. That I would love to just preserve this whole canyon in my lifetime. I'm not going to rule from the grave. But in my lifetime, to protect this, so it remains unspoiled. Because it is beautiful!

But we're talking about selling 3 million acres of federal land. And it's becoming dangerous.

And it's a giveaway. Or a threat to nature.

But can we just look at the perspective here?

The federal government owned 640 million acres. That is nearly 28 percent of all land in America!

How much land do we have?

Well, that's about the size of France.

And Germany. Poland.

And the United Kingdom, combined!

They own and hold pristine land, that is more than the size of those countries combined!

And most of that is west of the Mississippi. Where the federal control smothers the states.

Okay?

Shuts down opportunity. Turns local citizens into tenets of the federal estate.

You can't afford any house because you don't have any land!

And, you know, the states can't afford to take care of this land. You know why the states can't afford it?

Because you can't charge taxes on 70 percent of your land!

Anyway, on, meanwhile, the folks east of the Mississippi, like Kentucky, Georgia. Pennsylvania.

You don't even realize, you know, how little of the land, you actually control.

Or how easy it is for the same policies, to come for you.

And those policies are real.

Look, I'm not talking about -- I'm disturbed by Chris Rufo saying, that it is the Olympic forest.

I mean, you're not going to live in the rain forest. I would like to hear the case on that.

But we're not talking about selling Yellowstone or paving over Yosemite or anything like that.

We're talking about less than one half of one percent of federal land. Land that is remote.
Hard to access. Or mismanaged. I live in the middle of a national forest.

So I'm surrounded on all sides by a national forest, and then BLM land around that. And then me. You know who the worst neighbor I have is?

The federal government.

The BLM land is so badly mismanaged. They don't care what's happening.

Yeah. I'm going to call my neighbor, in Washington, DC, to have them fix something.

It's not going to happen.

If something is wrong with that land, me and my neighbors, we end up, you know, fixing the land.

We end up doing it. Because the federal government sucks at it.

Okay.

So here's one -- less than one half of 1 percent.

Why is it hard to access that land?

Well, let me give you a story. Yellowstone.

Do you know that the American bison, we call it the buffalo.

But it's the American bison.

There are no true American bison, in any place, other than Yellowstone.

Did you know that?

Here's almost an endangered species.

It's the only true American bison, is in Yellowstone.

Ranchers, I would love to raise real American bison.

And I would protect them.

I would love to have them roaming on my land.

But you can't!

You can't.

Real bison, you can't.

Why? Because the federal government won't allow any of them to be bred.

In fact, when Yellowstone has too many bison on their land, you know what the federal government does?

Kills them. And buries them with a bulldozer. Instead of saying, hey. We have too many.

We will thin the herd.

We will put them on a truck. Here's some ranchers that will help repopulate the United States with bison. No, no, no. You can't do that.

Why? It's the federal government. Stop asking questions. Do you know what they've done to our bald eagles.

I have pictures of piles of bald eagles.

That they'll never show you.

They'll never show you.

You can't have a bald eagle feather!

It's against the law, to have a feather, from a bald eagle!

If it's flying, and a feather falls off, you can't pick it up. Because they're that sacred.

But I have pictures of piles of bald eagles, dead, from the windmills.

And nobody says a thing.

Okay.

But we're talking about lands.

States can't afford to manage it.

Okay. But how can the federal government?

Now, this is really important.

The federal government is, what? $30 trillion in debt or are we 45 trillion now, I'm not sure?

Our entitlement programs, all straight infrastructure, crumbling.

And yet, we're still clinging to millions of acres of land, that the federal government can't maintain. Yeah, they can.

Because they can always print money.

We can't print money in the state, so we can't afford it.

Hear me out. The BLM Forest Service, Park Service, billions of dollars behind in maintenance, roads, trails, fire brakes.

Everything is falling apart..

So what's the real plan here?

Well, the Biden administration was the first one that was really open about it, pushing for what was called 30 by 30.

They want 30 percent of all US land and water, under conservation by 2030.

But the real goal is 5050.

50 percent of the land, and the water, in the government's control by 2050.

Half of the country locked up under federal or elite approved protection.

Now, you think that's not going to affect your ability to hunt, fish, graze, cattle. Harvest, timber, just live free. You won't be able to go on those. It won't be conservatives, who stop you from hunting and fishing.

It will be the same radical environmental ideologues, who see the land, as sacred, over people!

I mean, unless it's in your backyard. Your truck. Or your dear stand, you know, then I guess you can't touch that land.

Here's something that no one is talking about, and it goes to the 2030.

The Treasury right now, and they started under Obama, and they're still doing it now.

Sorry, under Biden.

And they're doing it now. The Treasury is talking about putting federal land on the national ballot sheet. What does that mean?

Well, it will make our balance sheet so much better.

Because it looks like we have so much more wealth, and we will be able to print more money.

Uh-huh. What happens, you know. You put something sacred like that, on your balance sheet, and the piggy bank runs dry.

And all of the banks are like, okay.

Well, you can't pay anymore.

What happens in a default?

What happens, if there's catastrophic failure. You don't get to go fish on that land. Because that land becomes Chinese.

You think our creditors, foreign and domestic, won't come knocking?

What happens when federal land is no longer a national treasure, but a financial asset, that can be seized or sold or controlled by giant banks or foreign countries.

That land that you thought, you would always have access to, for your kids, for your hunting lodge, for your way of life.

That is really important!

But it might not be yours at all. Because you had full faith in the credit of the United States of America.

So what is the alternative?

Supreme Court UPHOLDS Tennessee trans law, but should have done THIS

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor a Tennessee law that bans transgender surgeries for minors. But famed attorney Alan Dershowitz explains to Glenn why “it should have been unanimous.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Alan Dershowitz, how are you?

ALAN: I'm doing great, how about you?

GLENN: It has been a really confusing week. I'm losing friends, I think, because I stand with Israel's right to defend themselves. And I'm pointing out, that while I don't want a war, Iran is a really bad place.

And then I see, the Supreme Court comes out best interest there are three justices are like, I don't know. I think children, you know, can change their identity before we even let them drive or carry a gun. Or enlist in the military.

It's insane!

ALAN: It is insane. Especially since the radical left said that -- 17 and a half-year-old -- voluntary sex with their boyfriend. That would be sexist, that would be horrible.

But they can consent to have an abortion. They can consent to have radical surgery, that can't be reversed.

By the way, the decision is like six to two and a half. Elena Kagan, my former colleague at Harvard, didn't reach the merits of whether or not a state could actually ban these operations on a minor. She got involved in whether or not you need super, duper scrutiny, or just super scrutiny, a kind of, you know, a very technical thing.

But she didn't rule on whether under any kind of scrutiny, the state could do that. So definitely, two of them said that the state could do it, but not necessarily a third one.

GLENN: Okay.

Can you break this argument down? And why it should have been unanimous?

ALAN: Oh, it should be unanimous. There's no question.

States under the Constitution, have the authority to decide medical issues. States decide a whole range of medical issues. I remember when I was a young professor, there was an issue of whether or not one twin could be operated on to remove a kidney, to be given to another twin.

And, you know, that case went all the way through -- the federal government never got involved in that. That was up to the state of Massachusetts. They made interesting decisions.

Some states go the other way.

Half the countries of Europe go one way. The other half go the other way. And just as Justice Brandeis once said that things are the laboratories of Constitutional experimentation.

They have the right to do things their own way. And then we'll see over time. Over time, I predict that we will find that this kind of surgery, is not acceptable scientifically for young people.

And the New York Times had an absurd op-ed yesterday. By the mother of a transgender person.

And it never mentioned. It originally said that the person was now 18 years old.

And the decision does not apply to anyone who is 18.

You know, just wait. Don't make irreversible decisions while you're 12 years old. Or 13 years old.

Because we know the statistics show, that some people, at least, regret having made these irreversible decisions, particularly. Yeah.

GLENN: So why is it -- why is it that the state. Why wasn't the argument, you can't do this to children?

ALAN: Well, you know, that's the question.

Whether or not if the state says, you can do it to children, that violates the Constitution. I think states are given an enormous amount of leeway, this. Deciding what's best for people.

You leave it to the public.

And, you know, for me, if I were, you know, voting. I would not vote to allow a 17-year-old to make that irreversible decision. But if the state wants to do it. If a country in Europe wants to do it. All right!

But the idea that there's a constitutional right for a minor, who can't -- isn't old enough to consent to a contract, to have sex, is old enough to consent to do something that will change their life forever, and they will come to regret, is -- is absurd.

GLENN: So I don't know how you feel about Justice Thomas. But he -- he took on the so-called experts.

And -- and really kind of took him to the woodshed. What were your thoughts on that?

ALAN: Well, I agree with that. I devoted my whole life to challenging experts. That's what I do in court.

I challenge experts all the time. But most of the major cases that I've won, have been cases where experts went one way, and we were -- persuaded a jury or judge. That the expert is not really an expert.

Experts have become partisans, just like everybody else.

And so I'm glad that expert piece is being challenged by judges.

And, you know, experts ought to challenge judges, judges challenge experts. That's the world we live in. Everybody challenges everybody else. As long as all of us are allowed to speak, allowed to have our point of view expressed, allowed to vote, that's democracy.

Democracy does not require a singular answer to complex medical, psychological, moral problems. We can have multiple answers.

We're not a dictatorship. We're not in North Korea or Iran, where the ayatollah or the leader tells us what to think. We can think for ourselves, and we can act for ourselves.

GLENN: Yeah. It's really interesting because this is my argument with Obamacare.

I was dead set against Obamacare. But I wasn't against Romneycare when it was in Massachusetts. If that's what Massachusetts wants to do, Massachusetts can do it. Try it.

And honestly, if it would work in a state, we would all adopt it.

But the problem is, that some of these things, like Romneycare, doesn't work. And so they want to -- they want to rope the federal government into it. Because the federal government can just print money. You know, any state wants to do anything.

For instance, I have a real hard time with California right now.

Because I have a feeling, when they fail, we will be roped into paying for the things that we all knew were bad ideas.

Why? Why should I pay for it in Texas, when I know it wouldn't work?

And I've always wanted to live in California, but I don't, because I know that's not going to work.

ALAN: Yeah. But conservatives sometimes take the opposite point of view.

Take guns, for example.

The same Justice Thomas says that I state cannot have the authority to decide that guns should not be available in time square.

Or in schools. There has to be a national openness to guns. Because of the second apple.

And -- you can argue reasonably, what the Second Amendment means.

But, you know, conservatives -- many conservatives take the view that it has to be a single standard for the United States.

It can't vary in their decision how to control -- I'm your favorite --

GLENN: Isn't that -- doesn't that -- doesn't that just take what the -- what the Bill of Rights is about, and turns it upside the head?

I mean, it says, anything not mentioned here, the states have the rights.

But they -- they cannot. The federal government cannot get involved in any of these things.

And these are rights that are enshrined.

So, I mean, because you could say that, but, I mean, when it comes to health care, that's not in the Constitution. Not in the Bill of Rights.

ALAN: Oh, no.

There's a big difference, of course.

The Second Amendment does provide for the right to bear arms.

The question is whether it's interpreted in light of the beginning of the Second Amendment. Which says, essentially, a well-regulated, well-regulated militia. Whether that applies to private ownership as well.

Whether it could be well-regulated by states.

Look, these are interesting debates.

And the Supreme Court, you know, decides these.

But all I'm saying is that many of these decisions are in some way, influenced by ideology.

The words of the Constitution, don't speak like, you know, the Ten Commandments and God, giving orders from on high.

They're often written in ambiguous terms. Even the Ten Commandments. You know, it says, thou shall not murder. And it's been interpreted by some to say, thou shall not still, the Hebrew word is (foreign language), for murder, not kill. And, of course, we know that in parts of the Bible, you are allowed to kill your enemies, if they come after you to kill you, rise up and kill them first.

So, you know, everything -- human beings are incapable of writing with absolute clarity, about complex issues.

That's why we need institutions to interpret them. The institutions should be fair.

And the Supreme Court is sometimes taking over too much authority, too much power.

I have an article today, with gay stone.

Can had starts with a quote from the book of Ruth.

And it says, when judges rule the land, there was famine.

And I say, judges were not supposed to ever rule, going back to Biblical times.

Judges are supposed to judge.

People who are elected or pointed appropriately. Are the ones supposed to rule.

GLENN: Quickly. Two other topics. And I know you have to go.

If I can get a couple of quick takes on you.

The Democrats that are being handcuffed, and throwing themselves into situations.

Do you find that to be a sign of a fascistic state or a publicity stunt?

ALAN: A publicity stunt. And they would knit it. You know, give them a drink at 11 o'clock in the bar. They will tell you, they are doing this deliberately to get attention.

Of course, a guy who is running behind in the mayor race in New York, goes and gets himself arrested. And now he's on every New York television station. And probably will move himself up in the polls.

So no.

Insular -- I don't believe in that. And I don't believe we should take it -- take it seriously.

GLENN: Last question.

I am proudly for Israel.

But I'm also for America. And I'm really tired of foreign wars.

And I think you can be pro-Israel and pro-America at the same time.

I don't think you can -- you don't have to say, I'm for Israel, defending themselves, and then that makes me a warmonger.

I am also very concerned about Iran. And have been for a very long time.

Because they're Twelvers. They're Shia Twelvers. That want to wash the world in blood. To hasten the return of the promised one.

So when they have a nuclear weapon. It's a whole different story.

ALAN: No, I agree with you, Tucker Carlson, is absolutely wrong, when he say he has to choose between America first or supporting Israel. Supporting Israel in this fight against Iran, is being America first.

It's supporting America. Israel has been doing all the hard work. It's been the one who lost its civilians and fortunately, none of its pilots yet.

But America and Israel work together in the interest of both countries.

So I'm -- I'm a big supporter of the United States, the patriarch. And I'm a big supporter of Israel at the same time.

Because they work together in tandem, to bring about Western -- Western values.

GLENN: Should we drop a bomb?

ALAN: Yes, we should.

GLENN: Our plane drop the bomb?

ALAN: Yes, we should. And without killing civilians. It can be done. Probably needs four bombs, not one bomb. First, one bomb to open up the mountain. Then another bomb to destroy what's going on inside.

And in my book The Preventive State, I make the case for when preventive war is acceptable. And the war against Iran is as acceptable as it would have been to attack Nazi Germany in the 1930s. If we had done that, if Britain and France had attacked Nazi Germany in the 1930s, instead of allowing it to be built up, it could have saved 60 million lives. And so sometimes, you have to take preventive actions to save lives.

GLENN: What is the preventive state out, Alan?

ALAN: Just now. Just now.

Very well on Amazon.

New York Times refuses to review it. Because I defended Donald Trump.

And Harvard club cancelled my appearance talked about the book. Because I haven't been defending Harvard. I've been defending President Trump's attack. By the way, they called Trump to Harvard: Go fund yourself.
(laughter)

GLENN: Okay.

Let's -- I would love to have you back on next week. To talk about the preventive state. If you will. Thank you, Alan. I appreciate it. Alan Dershowitz. Harvard Law school, professor emeritus, host of the Dershow. And the author of the new book that's out now, The Preventive State.

I think that's a really important topic. Because we are -- we are traveling down the roads, where fascism, on both sides, where fascism can start to creep in. And it's all for your own good.

It's all for your own protection. Be aware. Be aware.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

They want to control what you eat! — Cattle rancher's stark warning

American cattle rancher Shad Sullivan tells Glenn Beck that there is a "War on Beef" being waged by the globalist elites and that Americans need to be prepared for this to be an ongoing battle. How secure is America's food supply chain, and what does the country need to do to ensure food shortages never occur in the future?

Watch Glenn's FULL Interview with Shad Sullivan HERE