RADIOJuly 13, 2022

WATCH: NYC prepares residents for nuclear bombs. But, WHY?

What do leaders in New York City know that the rest of us do not? Because the city’s ‘Emergency Management’ team published a video earlier this week — called ‘Nuclear Preparedness PSA’ — which explained necessary steps for residents to survive a nuclear bomb. Glenn and Stu discuss the latest security threats facing America, why our current leadership likely would be entirely incompetent in responding to them, and why Glenn believes world elite actually do not want to avoid another world war…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So I saw this yesterday, one of the researchers brought it to my attention. And I was like, huh. I've got lots of questions. Let me play this public service announcement, from the -- from the state of New York.

Listen.
(music)

VOICE: So there's been a nuclear attack, don't ask me how or why. Just know that the big one has hit. Okay?

So what do we do? There are three important steps, that I want you to remember. Step one, get inside, fast. You, your friends, your family. Get inside. And, no, staying in the car, is not an option. You need to get into a building. And move away from the windows. Step two, stay inside. Shut all doors and windows. Have a basement head there.

If you don't have one, get as far into the middle of the building, as possible. If you were outside after the blast, get clean, immediately.

Remove and bag all outer clothing, to keep radioactive dust or ash away from your body. Step three, stay tuned. Follow media for more information. Don't forget to sign up for notify NYC for official alerts and updates. And don't go outside, until officials say it's safe. All right. You've got this.

STU: So it's like covid.

GLENN: I don't think I do have this. I don't. I don't think I have this.

That's from New York City emergency management. Now, why, on God's green earth, are they coming out with this?

Well, the response was, we're not saying, it's going to happen. We just want people to be prepared for anything. My response to that is, when do you release the PSA, for the bubonic playing?
(laughter)
I mean, if you're just making us prepared for anything, how about -- what happens when somebody on a ship starts to launch Buicks on to the streets of New York? With a catapult?

I mean, we haven't thought of a nuclear strike in how come. What do they know, that we don't know. If anything?

STU: Well, first of all, they have been treating us like we are in the middle of the Bubonic Plague for the past two and a half years. So I don't think they need any updates on that particular one.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: But, look, what we mentioned earlier, we are on the verge of war. Is that the right way to put it, with Russia?

Certainly, Russia considers us, at the very least, to be at the -- on the verge of war.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: And that used to be something we were concerned about. And when we were at war with the Soviet Union, that's when we had the duck and cover vibe going on for everybody. So I'm not surprised. Honestly, it's probably something we should think about a little bit more.

GLENN: I would agree with you. And not just because of Russia. But because there's several people that would work technology, to make that happen.

So I was thinking about this yesterday, with Vladimir Putin. I mean, he grew up in the Cold War, where it was mutually assured destruction. MADD. And that was the theory, that kept us all alive. Nobody would launch a missile, because they knew that there would be a retaliatory strike, and nobody would -- nobody would survive. Okay?

Because if we -- if we launched a missile, then we launch a missile. And if they see that missile coming back, then they would launch all their missiles. Then we would launch all of our missiles. And then everybody would be dead.

Okay. He lived through this. He's been the one talking about a nuclear option.

Does he think that -- does he think that this administration, because I don't know. Just wouldn't launch? If they launched a missile at New York, and said, stay out of our backyard, would we just take it? Would this administration launch against Russia or not?

I mean, it's a very dangerous game. But I'm not convinced that this administration would do that.

STU: Hmm. I think there's definitely an argument here, to be made for that point.

I think maybe if it hit New York, maybe we would be more likely to do it. But couldn't you see -- they fire a nuclear missile, that lands in the middle of some uninhabited place in Kansas, or something.

Where, okay. Maybe it does some damage. But it's not wiping out a city of 11 million people. What would we do? Just back off?

GLENN: I don't think we do anything.

STU: Yeah. Certainly the last few times we've been challenged, not to that level, but to some level.

We basically backed off. We've just folded. Like what we did in Afghanistan, just basically folded up shop and left. So I don't know.

GLENN: Did you see what we're now saying? Other countries are financing the rebels to go against the Taliban.

And we came out with this moral indignation. And said, we're not doing that. And we don't think any country should do that. That's just wrong. Leave the Taliban alone.

What he has

STU: Yeah. It's bizarre.

And I think a lot of the people look at the Russian stuff with Ukraine. And there's a lot to be critical there. We've been critical of a lot of it. And I think a lot of people look at it and say, okay. In our audience. They're always hyping the Russia stuff. They're always saying how bad Russian is. They're lying all the time in the media about it. And a lot of time, they're lying in the media about it.

But like, there's real -- I think real reason to be concerned about this.

For -- in two different ways. Let's say you're a Biden fan, right?

You're a liberal, you love Joe Biden. I think .03 percent of the population is still in this category. So we want to make sure we address them. And like, the only thing standing in between us and World War III, is Vladimir Putin's restraint. Right?

That's it. At any point, Vladimir Putin can say, you know what, I think you sending that missile over to Ukraine, is enough for me to cross the line, and he can decide to start World War III just on his own basis.

GLENN: And he has said that. He has said that. Any missile that came from the United States. If it lands in Russian territory, we will pay a heavy price. And if I remember right, it gave me at least the feeling. We were talking about a strike on us.

STU: Certainly, it seems like a major escalation. And any major escalation, would theoretically cause a response, that could easily go out of control. And we're in the middle of World War III. Maybe missiles flying over polarized ice caps. That is not a crazy idea. If you happen to be someone who is skeptical of Joe Biden, and his presidency. And his ability, his cognitive abilities. Any of those things, you not only have the idea of -- even if you don't think he's the devil that the media constantly portrays him as, which I think he's done much to deserve. But still, if you don't even believe that, he's still not exactly a stable character. You have that, but then you also have this guy, who is falling off his bicycle every ten minutes. To walk the line. Between World War III and peace. This guy is the guy navigating the border between -- this breaking out into a much larger conflict, that could very well result in, God only knows, nuclear missiles flying over ice caps. It's certainly -- it's certainly in the stream of possibilities here. If people like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris screw up a little bit. The lady who is out here. We have veepthoughts.com, where she's tripping over her words every ten seconds. Joe Biden is overseas making speeches about how we have to remove Vladimir Putin because he can no longer be in power, changing seemingly US policy on the fly, by mistake.

If you are at all worried about the competence of the Biden administration, this has to be something you're concerned about. Because they could screw this up, at any moment. And even if that was never the intent of Russia, to get into a larger scale conflict with us. The people we have in control navigating these lines. Are not cable of doing it.

So we are in trouble, just because our leadership is who our leadership is.

GLENN: I'm going to make a prediction. That before this guy is out of office. And I think we've already faced it.

I'll bet you we've already faced it. Something close.

We will have a Cuban Missile Crisis-style crisis.

We will -- it will hit to that level. Whether we find out about it or not, I'm not sure.

But I'll bet you, we're going to hit. Because we're too weak. Do you know why -- do you know why the prime minister, Abe, why his death is so important?

He is -- he was extremely powerful. And he was Japan first. And I don't have a problem with that. I think every country, should be their country first. Take care of business. And that will -- you know, you'll be able to take care of yourself.

Well -- and then help others.

His death, made a landslide for his party. And the prime minister. The current prime minister is in the same party as Abe. It's a liberal Democratic Party. But, you know, they're more conservative by Japan's standards. But don't be fooled.

So the recent election has gone as a huge support for now the party, that is of the current prime minister. And what he's working on.

Now, Kashida, I think is his name. He's a huge supporter of The Great Reset. He is -- he wants Japan, to be the model country, for The Great Reset.

Here's the -- here's one of the problems, however. Abe, his party wants to build their own military. They want to have their own military power. I personally think that's good. And I think that's why Abe and Donald Trump got along so well. Because America first, Japan first. You should run your own protection.

Why -- why? Other than, you know, in the 1940s, we're a little smoked. And they were a little smoked at us. And we were like, yeah. No army will protect you. Japan has a role to play in security.
And that's why this is a problem. Because it looks like his death, is being used as a rallying cry for the things that he believed in, which has changed the Japanese Constitution. So it can -- expand its military.

Now, that seems good for us, right?

Or does it? Because Japan wants to expand its military, because it doesn't trust China. Now, China will look at Japan, as a massive threat. Not just America. But Japan.

Does that make them more likely to stay contained, as they build their military? Or less likely?

We have the stars aligning for a -- a global war. Where you have Russia and China, and Iran, and all the bad guys on one side.

And then you have The Great Reset powers aligned in Asia, and here in the West. And I don't think anyone is trying to avoid it. I mean, I think there's lots of people trying to avoid it. But I don't think the world leaders necessarily see this as a bad thing. Because it will hasten -- I almost said hasten the return of the promised one. And it might do that.

But it will -- it will hasten the changes that they feel, have to be made.

And people will go along with it. Because they will just want war to end.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.