Highlights: Rick Santorum talks economy, controversy, and faith on GBTV

The FULL interview is available ONLY on GBTV! Start your two week free trial to watch ON DEMAND!

On GBTV Thursday night, Rick Santorum joined Glenn in the Dallas studios for a one on one interview. Many of the questions came from viewers, who submitted their questions via Facebook and Twitter.

Glenn’s goal was to ask the questions that the mainstream media was missing. He started off on the economy, what will likely be the biggest issue in the next election.

Glenn asked him about The Fed, cutting entitlements, and spending cuts in the age of Occupy Wall Street. You can watch Santorum discuss the economy in the clip below:

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV

Santorum said that one of the main ways in which he would cut spending and the size of the federal government would be to cut entitlement programs, especially Medicare and Medicaid. He said the two programs have become bloated and corrupt, and Santorum proposed bringing them into the competitive free marketplace.

Santorum later added that the one area of government he would not cut is military and defense.

Proposals to cut entitlements are highly controversial, so Glenn asked Santorum how he would handle the inevitable backlash from progressives who are already deeply upset with government, such as the protesters on Occupy Wall Street.

Rick said the key was educating the American people. “You have to trust the American people,” Santorum said. “Engage Americans and trust people enough to tell them the truth.”

Education was a central part of Santorum’s interview. On many issues, he said the American people needed to be educated about what was really happening in this country and the world and that people were not being told the full story. In addition to entitlements, he said people needed to know about the benefits of drilling in the ANWR and what the costs/benefits would be for America.

Glenn also took time to ask Santorum about some recent controversies, including his record on abortion and his relationship with the Tea Party and libertarians.

Watch Santorum’s response below:

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV

Finally, in a move you won’t see on the mainstream media networks, Glenn invited Karen Santorum and a few of the couple’s children onto the set. They discussed the role that faith played in Rick’s decision to run for President as well as how entering the race has affected their family.

Watch this segment you won’t see anywhere else below:

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV
  • Anonymous

    Dear Glenn, Please do not compare Ron Paul or his supporters to OWS or the french revolution, and say in the same breath that Santorum is somehow like the George Washington, and the American revolution. It is an insult! Santorum is a flip flopper period! He believes government has a place to tell the American people how to live their lives! He said as much today on your show! I have been a faithful listener and fan for years. I DO NOT agree with you on Ron Paul, and personally feel you are borderline flip flopping yourself. I respect your position and will continue to grit my teeth while I watch the ONLY constitutionalist candidate (Ron Paul) get brushed aside because you feel he is somehow disqualified because of foreign policy. Just remember you said yourself, You think we need to bring the troops home. You think we are going to default. Well how are we going to fight another war if we default? I just don’t understand, and it really bums me out that I have to ask this question of a man I respect sooooo much. I know im going to get blasted by everyone, and thats fine. Im just doing what Glenn always say’s: “question with boldness, and speak without fear!” Thank you.

  • Debbie C

    Glenn that was a great interview. We had an opportunity to hear his answers
    without 30 secs responds. I received more information about Rick that I like. We
    are not going to agree on everything, but if we agree with most then he is the
    candidate that we need at this time and he has my vote. Thanks Glenn. Prayers going up for you and your family Glenn. In Jesus Name.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000364792093 Marlene Klein

    Interesting how it seems Romney and Obama are now trying to tap into the Christian Conservative voters. We are strong and I am encouraged by what I see, that the US hasn’t lost it’s faith completely (compare to England), that the Christian movement is still vibrant. 

  • Anonymous

    Santorum for President 2012!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/sgtNACHO Nathan Watrous

    The second two videos won’t open :(

  • http://www.facebook.com/walkin.one.man.genocide Carl Stull

    I don’t care what Glenn Beck says….. Glenn Beck is wrong. Big Spending, Big Government neocons, like Rick Santorum, is why the Tea Party was formed in the first place.. Santorum gets the nomination and you’ll be voting for another George W. Bush… If these candidates really cared about the American people, they’d be showing how they can help us live when gas is over 6 bucks a gallon. There’s only one candidate that can stop this country from a depression and total turmoil and that’s Ron Paul. You THINK life is tough now, ask one of the old folks that lived through the great depression how tough that was….. or you can just ask Ron Paul, b/c he’s the only candidate that had that experience.

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/16/the-deal-with-jack-hunter-the-republican-mess/

    A few days ago some of my brothers of war marched in front of the White House for Ron Paul, those are OUR countries troops, and they’re trying to send everyone a message, and if you truly supported the troops, you would support their decision as well. They’re telling people they want to come home and Santorum, Romney, and Gingrich, none of them of who actually served in the military, are telling them that they can’t.

    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/political-pro-con/2012/feb/17/veterans-ron-paul-march-white-house/

  • Anonymous

     Then don’t sign up for the military punk…if you can’t stand the heat get out, you and your like-minded so called patriots – babies – and spoiled brats!!! Get a life!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Irina-Krasnyuk/745534442 Irina Krasnyuk

    a very sombre picture…..in slumber do we suite

  • Anonymous

    Wow way to make your point…Call the man a punk, disrespect his service, and the other soldiers as well that have fought for your right to say such intelligent things! So sad to even point this out. I will pray for you! Good day!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TBMRE5AH3RPJI62TGPHZEN7R7Q Crystal

    Even though Ron Paul called Rick Santorum ‘fake’ I honestly don’t believe it. This interview just showed how real and human Santorum really is. He’s made mistakes in the past and admits them. Giving credit to God for his surge is a sign of being humble. He’s more real than the other 3 canidates can ever be.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/SR6TPGWNCJ6OYIP55GR74JLL6Y Nigel

    If some one said I couldn’t access my bank account because they said so I would be irked. Seems you would have to wait for your own social security money under this guy. Here is what should be done:  End forced social security and medicare and medicad, cash it all out. What ever amount you put in you can take out in one lump sum check and do with it as you please. I know I can spend my money or save  far better than a corrupt government bureaucracy.

  • Anonymous

    Pray for Glenn. Last few times on his show he looked so tired. I cant even imagine the kind of pressure he and his family are under

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     AMEN!  The only thing Glenn has been consistent on is being inconsistent!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     You mean Obama with an R in front of his name….

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     Get your punk A** of the computer and being the little B*t*h that you are and actually defend these freedoms before criticizing us military on our decisions on who to support!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002138098531 Caitlin Nicholas

    He does. He seems so stressed out lately. And exhausted. 

  • Anonymous

    Yes a man who gets shot at for a living is a baby.
    Seriously every politician should read Thucydides and just see what happened to Athens.

  • Anonymous

    These guys all need to read Thucydides and see what happened to Athens.  We’re in a comparable situation and Ron Paul really seems like the only one with a grip on the dangers of this.  Obama wouldn’t be the end of the world in this regard, he’s kind of cryptic in foreign policy.  Not the biggest talker but he’s shown he’s not afraid to get a little rough with our “enemies” without getting overly bogged down in a conflict.  Not ideal, but pragmatically not a disaster. 

  • Lioness

    Keep spreading the love.

  • Anonymous

     For the first time in a very long time, I would like to thank glenn beck for this interview and his support of Santorum.
    Santorum’s answers will continue to dig the grave of his Presidential run.
    and…
    glenn beck’s support and endorsement are the kiss of death to any national candidate.

  • Anonymous

     Why do all of the Ron Paul supporters use the line that all of the military is for Ron Paul so therefore we should vote for him. I can find veterans that support everyone of these candidates. But I guess that doesn’t matter, we should only honor those veterans that support Ron Paul. PLEASE! That is a sad attempt to try and get people to vote for him out of pity.

    Let me ask you this, does it bother you at all the Ron Paul has formed an alliance with the biggest Rino of them all Romney? Your hero is working on getting Romney elected because they have made a backroom deal. Or haven’t you noticed that Romney and Paul never attack each other, only other candidates?

    This article talks about Murray Rothbard,  one of Ron Pauls heros.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/02/conservatives_and_libertarians_1.html

    Here is a clip of Ron Paul acting presidential for his 1988 bid for presidency.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_m0p-Xt5r0

  • Lioness

    Obama may not end the world but he will destroy America.

  • Lioness

    You won’t get blasted here. I’m in disagreement with Glenn about Santorum too.  I like Newt and would happy with Paul if nominated. Although I am concerned about that little chummy thing going on between him and Romney. If that were actually true. I would have to disqualify him too. Hope it’s all just a rumor.

  • Anonymous

    Even more serious…every politician should do what they swore to do and uphold the constitution…instead of belly-aching all the time…just do your job.

  • Anonymous

    I see your bubble is holding up

  • Anonymous

    Waynes World the sequel…

  • Anonymous

    No, I mean Rick Santorum…should replace Obama with “The New President” before his name.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that hard core tea partiers are not happy with any candidate.  It is looking more like you are gonna get your wish.  None of these guys are true hard core across the line conservatives and by default Obama will be your candidate.  Here is the difference with Rick versus Obama.  Obama does not give a damn about anybody but his marxist ideology.  At least Rick would understand we are a representative.  Did Rick approve of big govt spending?  Yes and he acknowledged it was wrong.  When has Obama said he committed any wrong doing?  

  • http://twitter.com/MattFusinato Matt Fusinato

    Indeed, on one hand, you can say it was foolish for Santorum to cook up an excuse for his dismal outing. Santorum already has a reputation for being thin-skinned and peevish. This tactic certainly made him seem like a poor sport. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/no-conspiracy-ron-paul-just-dislikes-santorum/2012/02/23/gIQAMbLaXR_blog.html

  • mallikarjun bhaikatti

    GOOD ONE……

  • http://twitter.com/msmaggie38 maggie b

    What is Santorum’s relationship with HSUS since he introduced legislation written by them?

  • http://www.facebook.com/lindeymagee Lindey Hughes Magee

    glenn, glenn, glenn. i have followed you with devotion since 2008 and still, based on what you’ve shown of yourself over the past few years, i cannot believe that you are not ron pauls biggest supporter. how about setting foreign policy differences aside long enough to realize paul is an opportunity to lessen the corruption in this country! to refocus on our constitution! i pray he comes out the winner despite the stupid media’s dumb spin. ron paul 2012! 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770151409 Debbie Custer Lemmon

    Rick may be nice but we can’t risk putting another over his head, has never lead anything, inexperienced Senator in the WH! Obama is nice too but so what! Mitt has character too! Many of those who know him personally say he’s the nicest guy they’ve ever met. He saved the Olympics, hundreds of struggling companies (many don’t know Bain actually had fewer companies that failed under Mitt’s lead than any other private equity firm), made a $3 billion deficit into a $2 billion rainy day fund, etc! If the Nikola Tesla of turn around’s say’s he wants to help, let him! 
    If we are silly enough to elect Santorum in our ridiculous search for perfection, we can be nicely assured Obama will have a another comfortable 4 years to destroy our country with more debt increases and wimpy foreign policies that risk our country. And to those Republicans who do, I say thank you for chocking up our country once again to an inexperienced, has never lead anything Senator, Rick Santorum and an inexperienced, has never lead anything, Barack Obama. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vickie-Smith/1462145959 Vickie Smith

     Yep not working for me either.  At this point I’d vote for Mitt or Rick but NOT NEWT,…..Ron over Obama………not sure who I really would like for the Primary. But in my state of Idaho I can almost bet Mitt will win….

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     There is nothing going on between Romney and Paul, that is completely stirred up by the establishment and Fox News to try and get Romney’s numbers back up by trying to persuade the enthusiastic Paul supporters to be more comfortable with Romney.  Both the establishment and Fox knows it will be impossible for Romney to win the general election without garnering the Paul supporters and the Paul supporters are not going to vote for any of the other 3 no matter what, so they have to try to convince them otherwise.

  • Anonymous

    Ron Paul is a lunatic!!! Do you want someone in office that will legalize drugs??? In his 25 years in the Senate he has never voted to have any bill passed. What do you think he will do as President?? If he gets the nomination Obama will surely win reelection!!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

    You mean Frothy?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

    First, Paul supporters don’t say ALL troops support Paul, but the majority of those troops who donate to campaigns donate to Paul.  Second, Do you get any information outside of Fox News and the MSM?  That rumor was solely started by them and the establishment to bring Romney’s numbers back up.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t know him I do, he roams around this site calling everyone out on their religious beliefs – political alliance, or whatever else, he can muster up to cause trouble, for the sole purpose – to instigate – its who he is, a real trouble maker with a chip on his shoulder – and now he’s whining like a little girl, about how he is so mistreated by his ex-employer Uncle Sam, when it was he, who enlisted in the first place – not only is he a PUNK – he’s a WEASEL and a Mommas boy!!! By the way – pray for yourself – leave me out.

  • SoThere

    Ron Paul’s a nut.  Has been for 3 decades.

  • Anonymous

    Rick Santorum is to be admired for the courage of his convictions. He has in the past, allowed the courage of his convictions to interfere with sound political judgment. A devout Catholic, he has never shied away from criticizing “cafeteria Catholics” and defending an orthodox interpretation of his religion. I could be wrong, but judging another’s faith lies only in His hands; not some politician’s. He has also veered into the area of stating political views that are based on Catholic orthodoxy. That is fine–it is his perogative, but it is not a politically sound approach to victory in November. While I am surprised at his recent traction, I also underestimated Mitt Romney’s inability to move Republicans. So my political judgment may be way off. However, in my opinion, Rick Santorum is a gift wrapped package to Obama to mobilize the Democratic base, where he is despised. He gets the nomination and watch the fund raising roll in for Obama. In a Romney-Obama one to one, the distinctions between the two are less clear. Independent voters and and moderate Democratic voters would be drawn to someone who appears to know business more than the flailing and failing Obama economic team. In a Santorum-Obama contest, the social conservative issues will be piled on by the Democratic apparatus so much so, that I could foresee a debate in which Obama could allow the Democratic machine to attack and simply make one-liners about Santorum’s past statements and positions on social issues. Romney-obama contest at least has the potential to stay focused on the economy and international power and prestige of the United States.

    Examples of his theology interfering with sound political judgment:

    –as to the Boston priest sex abuse, Santorum opinied: “While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm. ”  A gratuitous statement at best; an uninformed opinion as well. It also ignored the significant problems in the Philadlephia Archdiocese, and other  cities (as diverse as LA, Kansas City and Anchorage Alaska). It clearly demonstrated Santorum’s weakness of allowing his religious/cultural view to cloud rational political judgment and ignore the facts.With one notorious exception (Paul Shanley), the priests at the center of the scandal came from non-liberal, working class conservative Catholic families; none of whom attended the fancy universities in Boston, but rather went straight to seminary out of high school. They were pedophiles/monsters who took advantage of young boys who were raised by conservative Catholic parents who told them to never question a priest. You do not defend criminal behavior that is covered up by an institution your faith in God should not make you blind to the sins of man.

    – As to his recent statement about no abortion for rape victims……… he actually said “her child” as if it was some gift from God. While I do not favor abortion on demand, I wonder how many parents truly believe that?

    –As to working families: While no one can argue that it is better to have one parent at home, the reality is we live in a world of two parent working families. For Rick Santorum to sanctimoniously declare that feminism and working women is the root at the decline of civilization is going to alienate a significant percentage of half of the electorate.

    He will be pilloried in the press, like nothing you have seen. Lying in wait they are for his nomination.The objective is to win in November. Obama can beat Rick Santorum.  Romney can beat Obama. I am a pragmatist, not a philosopher.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     1.  Prohibition has never worked on anything it has been tried.  2. Ron Paul has never been in the Senate.  3.  What he will do as President is veto every bill that accumlates more debt, every bill that is unconstitutional, and every bill that takes away individual liberty! 4.  If anyone else gets the nomination Obama will win the election, no other candidate has the appeal to the independents who decide the election.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     I know Santorum’s nephew knows him and he’s a Ron Paul supporter!

  • http://www.facebook.com/nic.godfrey Nic Godfrey

    Romney is not the answer, he is to Obama as Bud Light is to Budweiser.  We dont need a Liberal leaning republican in the WH.  We need someone with true conservative values, who will actually cut the government, secure our borders, provide the military with stability not cuts.  

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TPYB7J2BTVYJ4JKBQZTMAU3BNQ Vinny

    He’s a lunatic??  LOL, he’s a doctor you brainwashed fox news drone. Turn off your tv and start reading.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TPYB7J2BTVYJ4JKBQZTMAU3BNQ Vinny

     I was in the military for over a decade as well and have been ripped about my service on this forum just for having a difference of opinion.  This is nothing new here, I’ve come to expect it.  Maybe some of you should listen to what us veterans have to say instead of what Glenn Beck or Hannity says.  We have some insight.  Most active duty and former military want Ron Paul, there’s a reason for that.  We don’t want phony wars that make the world worse.  Iran is NO threat, you people are living in fantasy land.  Cenk breaks it down and even shows you have your being manipulated, watch and learn:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c0tcZxJeB4

  • Mary Ann Mortensen

    I’m really concerned about Rick’s views on other faiths: http://bit.ly/zCxnqm Here’s a sample of another controversial slam Rick made in his 2008 speech to Ave Maria College that NO ONE on the right is discussing. It’s a HUGE concern for me:

         Rick Santorum: “We all know that this country was founded on a Judeo-Christian ethic but        the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian ethic, sure the Catholics had some influence, but this was a Protestant country and the Protestant ethic, mainstream, mainline Protestantism, and of course we look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it. So they attacked mainline Protestantism, they attacked the Church, and what better way to go after smart people who also believe they’re pious to use both vanity and pride to also go after the Church.”

    I’m sorry, but all other faiths than his “are in shambles?” Wow, Rick, Wow. I had asked if Glenn would bring this up during this interview. I have not had a chance to watch the whole thing. This is very troubling. The last thing we need is someone who’s never had a grown up job outside of Washington, no executive experience, who can’t seem to see the dangerous flaws in his own faith… including all the Social Justice religious that personally destroyed my faith in Reagan and dragged me to all the “Give Peace A Chance” marches on Washington. 

    Since Rick hates the wealthy and all those who have donated hard-earned money to Romney who then uses it in a way that will be needed against Obama’s war chest… I’m very concerned. We need a steady, measured leader who has real world experience… like Romney. I think Rick needs to stop campaigning on a shoe string and learn how to lead his own campaign from money he has earned from his supporters. The media needs to report on real news which they can’t if he continues to do interviews on every channel and outlet every hour of the day. There are a LOT of problems with Rick, who in 2006 was listed as one of the top 20 most corrupt legislatures in Washington by  Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington http://bit.ly/b5IB2H I love Glenn and the gang… but they can’t see how they are letting the media tell them who to vote for. By the way, Ronald Reagan was a very liberal Democratic governor from a very liberal state… If thinking you have to be a Conservative since diapers is the test… most of us wouldn’t pass… even Ronald Reagan. We converts know ‘em when we see ‘em cuz we were once one. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TPYB7J2BTVYJ4JKBQZTMAU3BNQ Vinny

    He’s a nut, and your senseless opinion backed up by zero facts makes you a relevant source? LOL  Ron Paul is a doctor sir, what do you do for a living?  Ron Paul also delivered how many babies??  Also, how long has he held office in Texas??  I think we know who the real nuts are around here…  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Ron Paul is no nut, your just brainwashed by MSM and your delivering their talking points right on cue.  Good boy. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     And you are a coward zerogon.  Luckily people like him serve to protect your rights to be the coward that you are unlike yourself!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     Actually Glenn agreed with Ron Paul on his foreign policy’s as said in the link below along with his current agreement on his economic policy’s.  He’s just recently within the last 8 months changed his stance.  Ironically I remember Glenn doing several shows on Fox stating he can’t trust a politician because they lose their sole.  Yet Santorum said exactly that in the Arizona debate with “it was against my principals, but politics is a team sport folks” and Glenn somehow has decided to get in bed with no integrity?

    http://youtu.be/SXUBDT75jyI

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

    I would be stressed too if I flip flopped as much as Romney to get ratings…

  • SoThere

    Jew hater. In your own words:

    “Most of our problems is from our support for israel, most of our wars are because of israel, our filthy hollywood is made up of mostly jewish directors, jewish funded films, and mostly jewish actors.”

    ” I do NOT stand with Israel, and everyone that reads history rather than Faux news will know the truth. I’m not anti-Jewish, I’m anti Zionist.”

    ” Now go do some research about how the Jew’s are 1.7% of the US population yet they make up over 40% of the politicians in power in the US, they also make up over 70% of the actors and directors in Hollywood and are responsible for all the filth and trash thats being pumped out to our youth. Tim Geitner, Feinstein, Bernake, Sachs, Chertoff, JP Morgan/Chase, Leiberman, Schumer…ect…the list goes on. FACT: 14 of the 23 senior officials that run the US Treasury are Jews….”

    “It’s only antisemitism if you believe the lie that the imposters currently occupying Palestine are Semites….which they most certainly are NOT!! Revelation 3:9 and Revelation 2:9!!”

    “Saw the 1.5% Jewish comment….yes, they are a very small population in the US…yet they dominate such high positions in the US…amazing right? pffffttt your blind. Goodbye.”

    And lets not forget your very first post here:

    ” on Glenn: Don’t ever call it ‘West Bank’ again 07/29/11 02:27 PM

    That explains why our JEWdicial system is so terrible.”

    Right out of Paul Joseph Goebbels playbook.

  • SoThere

    Jew hater. In your own words:

    “Most of our problems is from our support for israel, most of our wars are because of israel, our filthy hollywood is made up of mostly jewish directors, jewish funded films, and mostly jewish actors.”

    ” I do NOT stand with Israel, and everyone that reads history rather than Faux news will know the truth. I’m not anti-Jewish, I’m anti Zionist.”

    ” Now go do some research about how the Jew’s are 1.7% of the US population yet they make up over 40% of the politicians in power in the US, they also make up over 70% of the actors and directors in Hollywood and are responsible for all the filth and trash thats being pumped out to our youth. Tim Geitner, Feinstein, Bernake, Sachs, Chertoff, JP Morgan/Chase, Leiberman, Schumer…ect…the list goes on. FACT: 14 of the 23 senior officials that run the US Treasury are Jews….”

    “It’s only antisemitism if you believe the lie that the imposters currently occupying Palestine are Semites….which they most certainly are NOT!! Revelation 3:9 and Revelation 2:9!!”

    “Saw the 1.5% Jewish comment….yes, they are a very small population in the US…yet they dominate such high positions in the US…amazing right? pffffttt your blind. Goodbye.”

    And lets not forget your very first post here:

    ” on Glenn: Don’t ever call it ‘West Bank’ again 07/29/11 02:27 PM

    That explains why our JEWdicial system is so terrible.”

    Right out of Paul Joseph Goebbels playbook.

  • SoThere

    Jew hater. In your own words:

    “Most of our problems is from our support for israel, most of our wars are because of israel, our filthy hollywood is made up of mostly jewish directors, jewish funded films, and mostly jewish actors.”

    ” I do NOT stand with Israel, and everyone that reads history rather than Faux news will know the truth. I’m not anti-Jewish, I’m anti Zionist.”

    ” Now go do some research about how the Jew’s are 1.7% of the US population yet they make up over 40% of the politicians in power in the US, they also make up over 70% of the actors and directors in Hollywood and are responsible for all the filth and trash thats being pumped out to our youth. Tim Geitner, Feinstein, Bernake, Sachs, Chertoff, JP Morgan/Chase, Leiberman, Schumer…ect…the list goes on. FACT: 14 of the 23 senior officials that run the US Treasury are Jews….”

    “It’s only antisemitism if you believe the lie that the imposters currently occupying Palestine are Semites….which they most certainly are NOT!! Revelation 3:9 and Revelation 2:9!!”

    “Saw the 1.5% Jewish comment….yes, they are a very small population in the US…yet they dominate such high positions in the US…amazing right? pffffttt your blind. Goodbye.”

    And lets not forget your very first post here:

    ” on Glenn: Don’t ever call it ‘West Bank’ again 07/29/11 02:27 PM

    That explains why our JEWdicial system is so terrible.”

    Right out of Paul Joseph Goebbels playbook.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     Funny cause Santorum himself backed up Paul’s claim of “fake” when describing his vote for No Child Left Behind.  Santorum’s campaign should not be happy with that as they know that will be campaign ad #1 against him.

  • Anonymous

    @charbel- Um okay let me help you out a little because you seem to be confused about who Ron Paul even is. He is a congressman not a senator. Yes he will veto ANY bill that steals power from the people and gives power to the washington insiders that believe they know how to run your life better then you do. While legalizing drugs is not his champion cause the media uses it to fear monger people when his real focus is our debt! NO ONE ELSE is serious about our debt! PERIOD! But even if you want to make drugs an issue, who are you to tell ANYONE what to do with their bodies? You might as well jump on the obama bandwagon and tell people what to eat. Or perhaps you can help to get rid of alcohol too because it kills more people every year then ALL illegal drugs COMBINE! Of coarse your laws against drugs have also created all of the mexican drug cartels, and from what Glenn has shown us recently its just going swimmingly in mexico! Lastly on the drug thing, America makes up 5% of the worlds population, consumes 55% percent of the drugs on the planet so these laws have done a lot to stop people from drug use huh? YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE MORALITY! If people want to be degenerate drug addicts you can’t stop them. However if you look at Portugal where they legalized drugs ten years ago, they have had a rapid decrease in crime EVERY YEAR! Last but not least in the long shot- Dr. Pauls electability… He is the ONLY candidate that pulls democrats and independents to the republican ticket in large numbers! Do you know how many people switched parties to vote for RP? He has ALL the youth vote ages 18-34. You don’t understand, without a Ron Paul nomination, “Obama will surely win reelection!” as you say. Good day and please by all means fact check me. Thank you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bikenjohn John Kopczak

    Wow – thanks Glenn…I spent 2.5 hours yesterday in “probate court” hearings – the Judge was very competent, his staff seemed crisp and able but a strange current ran through the room…I couldn’t put my finger on it till I listened to your discussion with Rick Santorum last night…folks are too focused on “their money” without respect to how “their money” has anything to do with our pending collapse and/or resurrection…how appropriate in this Lenten season that we look for self education to HELP others…Rick seems to be correct in his assesment that seniors (me included) could help this country if this couintry were honest with them – his discussions in Florida with seniors proved that point – HOW  DO WE GET THIS MESSAGE OUT? IF WE DO, THANK GOD – NO OBAMA CRAP…  

    John Kopczak
    The following may answer some of my question stated below about a profile of Conservatives as opposed to the Typical Liberal as posted by facebook.com/therepublicanrevolution…good reading & let’s figure out how to right our sinking ship of stateThe Shadow Party – Publication Date: August 2006 America is under attack. Its institutions and values are under daily assault. But the principal culp…rits are not foreign terrorists. They are influential and powerful Americans secretly stirring up disunion and disloyalty in the shifting shadows of the Democratic Party. New York Times best-selling authors David Horowitz and Richard Poe (both former radicals) weave together riveting history, investigative reporting, and cutting political analysis to help expose and explain:

    The Shadow Party’s plan to rewrite the US Constitution.
    How the Shadow Party overthrows foreign governments – and why it may attempt to use the same methods here.
    The vast network of private think tanks, foundations, unions, stealth PACs, and other front groups through which the Shadow Party operates in America.
    The network’s voluminous contributions to the Democrats, which totaled more than $300 million in the 2004 elections, and its growing influence over the party’s message and policy.
    The politicians on both sides of the aisle who have exchanged political favors with George Soros and his “government-in-the-wings.”
    The Shadow Party’s efforts to conceal its radical agenda behind the “moderate” pose of Hillary Clinton and other public figures.
    The radical network’s plan to seize power in 2008.
    Show More
    Show Less

    ——————————————————————————–

    Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links (What’s this?)
    The Shadow Party
    http://www.christianbookbag.com
    Book by David Horowitz Low Prices & Free Shipping over $35
    Advertise on Amazon See a problem with these advertisements? Let us know See More
    Christianbookbag Christian bargain Bibles, fiction, nonfiction books http://www.christianbookbag.com Specializing in bargain Christian books, Bibles, Bible covers, and devotionals.

  • Anonymous

    Zerogon You obviously have some anger issues and your name calling is uncalled for. Your right I don’t know him, but I do see you disrespecting the military so I spoke up. I am very respectfully asking you to have some class and do not engage in hateful slander against someone who was voicing their opinion in a respectable manner. If this person is all the things you say he is, then what kind of person fallows them around spreading hateful remarks? It makes you look like the kind of person you claim this man to be, does it not? The fact is that the vast majority of soldiers support Ron Paul and you said a very disgusting thing. Please sir, just hear me out a little bit here, we must be kind to each other or we become what we claim to dislike in others. In other words, if you don’t have something nice to say, or constructive,… well you get the point. Oh and I already prayed for you, so sorry if my good intention offends you. thank you and have a nice day.

  • Anonymous

     Then explain why Ron Paul and Romney never attack each other? His son Rand Paul has already jumped out there and said he would be honored to be Romneys VP.

    Ron Paul is a radical libertarian. He and his followers do nothing but trash conservatives. They have done it to Ronald Reagan, William F Buckley, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Milton Friedman, Newt Gingrich, Michelle Bachman, and Rick Perry to name a few. Both Ron Paul and Romney are running in the wrong party. From what I have observed, Ron Paul supporters are ruled by their emotions rather than logic, much like OWS.

    Please give me the break down of how many troops there are, then how many donated to political candidates, and then the number that gave to Ron Paul. You will find that it is actually a small percentage that supports him.

    Do you get any information outside of the Ron Paul Newsletter or Occupy Wall Street?

    http://factreal.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/ron-paul-is-no-conservative-2/

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1681781692 Tim Cheney

    I really don’t understand all this double speak on spending. Either a leader has the drive and determination to stop spending more than the government takes in or he/she doesn’t. They have the conviction to spend within their means or they don’t. Why can’t someone, anyone, in the field of candidates stand and say “I will make the governtment live within it’s means within 90 days of being president”. Why? It wouldn’t be hard, difficult, or insurmountable. Just takes someone to stand in front and say this is going to happen. The public knows this needs to happen. Someone needs to have the guts to do this. It is the honorable thing to do. Anything less is dishonorable.

  • Anonymous

    Hey Vinny, Thank you for your service! What ever your opinion is, or whoever you support, I want you to know that this citizen supports you. :)

  • Anonymous

    Wayne I don’t know you but please don’t sink to a level of name calling. Your points are valid and you have a righteous platform. Just be kind brother, you’ve already won. :)

  • Anonymous

    I agree, he said that there has been some attempts to get at his family or something. Thats just terrible! I am definitely praying, and hoping that all the drama is out of his life. 

  • Anonymous

    Tim there has been, and his name is Ron Paul. He’s really the ONLY guy thats serious about our debt.

  • Anonymous

    Vinny, you’re brand of hate never ends does it?  This is what you do, and who you are, speaking volumes about your character.
    It also broadcasts to others of the content in your posts….predictable in it’s outcome, boring, a mishmash of unconnected rhetoric you use to 
    spread your particular kind of offal.   

    You are fixated in an unhealthy way on Glenn. You try to use the Military as added weight to your posts, and yet we know it is a lie.

    Yet you still employ this tactic, who do you think you’re trying to impress? All who post here consistently already know of your prevarications, and now outright lies.

    I used to believe you were a deluded poster, now I believe it’s your level of IQ that sets you back….you are incapable of learning from your mistakes, for you prove this with every opinion you utter….total drivel splashed across these pages everyday….sigh….what to do with you…maybe ignore you, and the followers who share your hate…..

     

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1681781692 Tim Cheney

    Has he actually come out with something concrete though? It isn’t enough to say it is a priority. Too many of these folks lack conviction. Has he come out and said he will make the country live within it’s means within X number of days? Or is he just another politician saying it will be a priority? 
    Seriously, it would not be hard to say something like “The greatest threat to the future of our country is spending money we don’t actually have. So join me in this difficult process of getting our spending under control. And as president, I will get the country within it spending means within 120 days of taking office or I will resign as president”. That is concrete, bold, clear, and a measurable deliverable. Has he (Ron Paul) done anything remotely like this? If he hasn’t, challenge him to do so. I would challenge any candidate to have the conviction to deal with this issue in such a way. I truly believe that it is attainable. If they don’t then they don’t truly care about spending, they don’t care about this country, they don’t care about our future. 

  • Anonymous

    You got to give it to them, they look so cute toghether. The two biggest prunes in America. Beck and Santorum. A match made literally in heaven (or at least in the same sick happy-joy-fairy-land-of-which-Jesus-alone-gives-tickets-to-it version of it).

  • Anonymous

    Yes sir. He is the ONLY candidate that came up with a plan to cut a trillion dollars in the FIRST YEAR! Thats trilion with a T! He did it 8 months ago, and all the other candidates only cut future spending, not current debt. Now in fairness Santorum finally came up with a plan to cut 100 billion dollars over a five year period, but its not even a drop in the bucket, and five years is a long time. We need drastic actions now to save our nation from default. The longer we kick the can, the harder its gonna hurt. Thank you. You can google his trillion dollar plan and see how serious he is. You just never hear about it because the media likes to talk about silly things that he doesn’t even champion in the first place.

  • Anonymous

    Although I agree Ron Paul is willing to cut cost of goverment,  I KNOW he will not protect OUR COUNTRY!  He actually thinks we can play nice in the sand box with evil doers!   The fact that so many young voters are for RP reminds me of the 1970′s, “give peace a chance!”  I’m confident that if the there is a real chance for PEACE,  America would be all in, but I’m assured by history and knowledge that hate, distruction and death to America, has been the goal of generations for too many countries.  Remember the Alamo….if we take out our defenses around the world and gather them all here in “Fort United States” we wil be sitting ducks, as were the defenders of the Alamo. 
     
    May God bless AMERICA, and may we protect our country!

  • Anonymous

    Glen I love ya but you are wrong on this one. I can’t imagine Rick as a President. He is a big baby. Please dont compare him to Goerge Washington. Rick has you fooled and what happened to encouraging us to make up our own minds. You are continually talking about how wonderful Rick is.  If he is so great why did his own state vote him out. He can’t take the heat. He is always so defensive and is always pouting.  Yes I am a Mitt drone.  Thanks for letting me vent. Patty

  • http://PalinsDirtyLittleSecret.blogspot.com/ RealSarahPalinExposedClickHere

    The daily news is getting more and more ridiculous. Made up news, polling numbers, fabricated surges, idiotic endorsements, delayed vote counts, I cannot imagine democracy prevailing in this next election. The link in my name exposes the biggest cover up in history.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1681781692 Tim Cheney

    I’m not trying to cap on Ron Paul only. But it sounds like another politician saying he is going to “chip away at the issue”. Instead of doing the right thing. Is he “Planning” on doing more than Rick Santorum…..sounds like it. But still is completely missing the mark. Spend what you have, honorable. Spend more than you have, dishonorable. Anything else is lawyer speak with escape clauses. We don’t need someone that will blame the people in office before him. Or blame congress or anyone else. Take bold leadership and fix it. or move out of the way.
    I fail to see the complexity here. Give me authority and I would be able to balance the budget. Anyone else with true conviction could too.

  • Anonymous

     Let me take a wild guess, your a PaulBot.

    And yes I already know that I am a paid government poster, sent by the men in black to discredit you.

  • Lioness

    Well that’s an interesting possibility. I’m still for Newt, but Ron Paul would be my second choice. I only go by records and I have to weigh the good with the bad. Newt has done a few questionable things but he did get results when It came to pro growth, he can manipulate congress well. Ron Paul has always stayed on message but he did not get much done. Aside from that I still feel he would make the right decisions as president. Either way Romney and Santorum are a big heck no for me.

  • Anonymous

    Great interview! I saw the whole thing and I listen to Glenn everyday

  • Jacobus brogly.decap

    QUOTE:”….Although I agree Ron Paul is willing to cut cost of goverment,  I KNOW
    he will not protect OUR COUNTRY!  He actually thinks we can play nice in
    the sand box with evil doers! …

    Mm, lets hear it from Ron Paul

    1) …no student visa’s from people of terrorist nations…
    2) .. have good border control
    3) .. immigration is good (as for highly educated professionals adding to BNP), you dont need more hamburgerflippers or MacD’s franchise owners

    yeah…..wich other politician is protecting the borders anyway….?

  • Anonymous

    Yes I’ve got an issue with people who roam the web, because they have nothing better to do with their spare time, other then to cause conflict and division at will.

    Sorry if that is how you feel, no, I admire our American troops and have a deep respect for them and the dangerous job they do. I have many friends who have put their lives on the line and it’s with this consideration, that I spoke out the way I did. He is a sorry example for our many courageous and brave troops, who, day in and day out, never complain and who often face hardships far greater than most of our citizens ever dreamed of. Each of our soldiers realized from day one, what they were getting themselves into and when their tour of duty would be over.

    There is a growing problem in our military where too many of our young people think that serving in the military is a picnic of some sort, or some exotic world travel vacation. Then reality sets in when the lead starts flying.

    We have become a feminized society and its showing in many areas of our nation, not just those who are serving in our military. A great number of these recruits should have never been accepted in the first place. If this anti-American rubbish is truly how they feel -General George Patton would be Tarred – Feathered and imprisoned in today’s crybaby America.

    Ron Paul is selling a ” bogus bill of goods” – he is encouraging dissent in our troops and planting division among our people. This “gentleman” ( and I use the term lightly) is one of Ron Paul’s disciples. Ron Paul is an instigator and an antagonist and he’s rubbing off the wrong way on our nations youth, the only reason he continues his challenge for the presidency, is to play the spoiler. (And to be frank – that’s starting to rub me the wrong way.)If Paul’s attacks on Santorum – Romney and Gingrich continue, Obama is assured a second term. He, nor do his constituents seem to care, they either don’t realize this, or its intentional – bottom line – its not good for moral fibber of our troops nor our citizenry.

    These people are political plants – steered here to these sites by the likes of Ron Paul and Obama….their here for one thing and one thing only – trouble and conflict. They bash honest hard working loyal Americans and then when someone like me fires back – they fade away into the background and laugh, while the likes of you and me duke it out. Its a big game to these little weasels they mock America and all that she stands for.

  • Anonymous

    I was thinking about the criticism and fear that the John Kennedy presidency put in the majority protestant electorate in 1960 as to whether he would be instituiting Catholic religious principles in the United Staes government. I happened upon this January 2002 article from the National Catholic Reporter about a celebration in Rome of the 100th birthday of the founder of Opus Dei, Jose Maria Escriva de Balaguer who was later cannonized by Pope Benedict. Interviewing Rick Santorum who attended the event, NCR reported:

    “In contemporary Western debates, this idea of unity between faith and political allegiance often puts Opus Dei-inspired politicians on the right.

    Santorum was a forceful champion of this view. He told NCR that a distinction between private religious conviction and public responsibility, enshrined in John Kennedy’s famous speech in 1960 saying he would not take orders from the Catholic church if elected president, has caused “much harm in America.”

    “All of us have heard people say, ‘I privately am against abortion, homosexual marriage, stem cell research, cloning. But who am I to decide that it’s not right for somebody else?’ It sounds good,” Santourm said. “But it is the corruption of freedom of conscience.”
    Santorum told NCR that he regards George W. Bush as “the first Catholic president of the United States.”

    “From economic issues focusing on the poor and social justice, to issues of human life, George Bush is there,” he said. “He has every right to say, ‘I’m where you are if you’re a believing Catholic.’ ”

    Not a member of Opus Dei, but an organization he favors (his sons  have attended an Opus Dei school, The Heights in Washington DC), Santorum cannot divorce his religious views from his political. That would be antithetical to his core. And for that he is to be commended by the Catholic Church. Whether the American electorate want that in their President remains to be seen.

    As a ex-Catholic and former Opus Dei youth, who spent three years in their clutches, I know of what I speak. I am not at all surprised at Santorum’s comments made at Ave Maria University (founded by Opus Dei member and pizza magnate Tom Monaghan) about protestant religions. Santorum is among the wealthy and influential Catholic lay leaders who believe that there is only one church folks, and that is the Catholic Church that adheres to strict doctrine.  His courting of fundamentalist Christians is what it appears to be-political opportunism. Look under the hood and kick the tires before you buy.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Peggy12

    I’m from Pennsylvania.  I’m a republican and I will vote for Rick as president.  To answer your question as to why “if rick is so great did his own state vote him out?” I can tell you this.  Pennsylvanians are stupid.  We never should have voted Rick out. Thank you

  • General Kota

    They would blame Bush for the moon smashing into the sun.

  • General Kota

    I am to welcome to the club we got cake and coffee in the break room. This guy is a total nut and I am just waiting for him to say Sarah Palin is an alien from Mars.

  • General Kota

    I will vote for anyone that is not Obama.

  • Anonymous

    I am from Pennsylvania and I would take issue with your assessment of our collective intellect. Pennsylvanians have voted for the candidate ultimately elected 8 out of the last 10 Presidential elections; so at least Pennsylvanians reflect the nation to some degree. Santorum lost because he lost touch with the real issues and he ran against Bob Casey’s son; who by name alone (certainly not experience) was able to carry areas of the state in additon to the traditional Democratic strongholds of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. Santorum had grown too big for his britches, had an unproven track record to support his seniority in the Senate Republican leadership, was disrespectful to the office of the presidency (Clinton) and took outlandish positions. Rick forgot who put him into power, never checked his ambition to run for President and was working on fulfilling that ambition. (even the title of his book, “It Takes a Family”  was a direct attack on the Clintons, who were already out of the White House, but Hilary was in the Senate– by mimicking the title of Hilary’s book. This title at the time was percieved as juevenile. Perception is everything in politics,  and although he brought home the bacon in pork spending to PA, voters saw through his ambition.Pennsylvanians tired of his act and boom he lost by a large margin

    I would have to say, in his off years, he has matured in his mannerisms and in his public appearances. But inside, he still has to fight the demon of saying the wrong thing at the wrong time.

  • General Kota

    Ouch friend remind me not to get on your bad side.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

    Wrong period.  The person that shows the greatest difference between Obama will win and that is certainly not the RINO from Mass or the anarchist from Texas.   Who did nothing in the House for over 23 years and over 600 bills.    The Independents want a difference that is why we lost in the last Presidental elections.   Paul said Santorum is a fake he is wrong not only in this but, he got his earmarks with out voting on them through putting in bills that would succeed and then voted against them.   Real honest person

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

    But you do not look at the side effect of drug addiction.   Making the drugs legal does not make them free.   It would lead to more theft and child abuse both of which have been directly linked to drug addiction.   Paul would allow everything which is amorality which differs not one bit from immorality and no ethics of Obama.  When the Independents realized exactly what he is they would not vote for him.

  • Anonymous

    I know he is a doctor, and every person is entitled to there own opinion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Donna-Fallis/1173604605 Donna Fallis

    Glenn, here’s the problem with all this. We can get rid of a bad GOP president. The Democrats have never had a problem disposing of one. With Obama, we’re likely to end up with elections being a thing of the past. I am going to hold my nose and vote for whoever the GOP nominates because we cannot survive another 4 years of Obama and there will be nothing left of our Constitution to protect our voting rights. The liberals are very dangerous to freedom:  http://commonsenseinaradicalage.blogspot.com/2012/02/theyre-all-losers.html

  • Anonymous

    I stand corrected, you are right, Ron Paul is not a Senator. Haven’t you ever made a mistake in your life??

  • Anonymous

     I’m a Libertarian and strongly disagree with Ron Paul on foreign policy.  Still, I agree with him probably 70% on things, which is more than I agree with Republicans on.  I agree with Republicans about 50%, and Democrats even less.  So Libertarian is the party I identify with the most.

  • Anonymous

    When this election series started, I looked at all the candidates and said to my wife, I like Santorum, Cain and Gingrich. She responded by telling me that they cannot make it because the MSM and the establishment Republicans won’t let them. In a way she was correct. They destroyed my friend Herman Cain. Then they jumped on Newt who is now down in the weeds. Rick is a good and decent man and now, they are on him. He is not 100% of what I want but neither was Ronald Reagan. I spoke with Ronald Reagan on two occasions and found that he was not 100% either but, he was my hero and was the best president for modern times. Romney brings back memories of McCain and Dole……. my stomach churns. Rick, on the other hand, brings back memories of Reagan. He is not perfect but, I think he is the best of the lot. At least he is not afraid to speak from his heart. That means a lot to me. Some call him names and lay some bad vibes on him but, I find those people are really Obama people anyway. And, I suspect a lot of Paul folks who try to discredit him are actually Obama people. Some of you Paulbots will jump me on this but, I have a right to my opinion so, there it is……………..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    There were some problems before drugs became illegal but they have gotten astronomically worse since then.  It is making huge profits for the drug lords.  Most people today can look back and understand why the prohibition of alcohol was so bad and why we had to make alcohol legal again.  Even though it is legal it does not mean it solves problems.  We have reduced the problems, reduced the money it took to catch the criminals, overall reduced related deaths, we at least make some money off of the sales as taxes, and have helped make profits to the businesses selling alcohol.  No one is saying making drugs legal will resolve all problems but it would over night cut a lot of funding to the drug lords where on our borders there have been many more deaths than soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.  There have also been more deaths from prescription drugs than illegal drugs.  You make it sound as if the illegal drugs in this country have always been illegal.  Here is one more part of the equation.  There are drug scientists who try to make drugs more addicting and different so that they are not illegal and people are more addicted to them.  It takes time to make them illegal.  If the less hard core drugs were legal there would be no need to keep trying to create more and more drugs to destroy human addicts with.  I do not use drugs but it is not that hard to simply look at the prohibition of alcohol and see many similarities.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    There were some problems before drugs became illegal but they have gotten astronomically worse since then.  It is making huge profits for the drug lords.  Most people today can look back and understand why the prohibition of alcohol was so bad and why we had to make alcohol legal again.  Even though it is legal it does not mean it solves problems.  We have reduced the problems, reduced the money it took to catch the criminals, overall reduced related deaths, we at least make some money off of the sales as taxes, and have helped make profits to the businesses selling alcohol.  No one is saying making drugs legal will resolve all problems but it would over night cut a lot of funding to the drug lords where on our borders there have been many more deaths than soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.  There have also been more deaths from prescription drugs than illegal drugs.  You make it sound as if the illegal drugs in this country have always been illegal.  Here is one more part of the equation.  There are drug scientists who try to make drugs more addicting and different so that they are not illegal and people are more addicted to them.  It takes time to make them illegal.  If the less hard core drugs were legal there would be no need to keep trying to create more and more drugs to destroy human addicts with.  I do not use drugs but it is not that hard to simply look at the prohibition of alcohol and see many similarities.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jackiewalker.stlouis Jackie Walker

    You are so misinformed about Ron Paul.  

  • http://twitter.com/rhondaleensb rhonda welsch

    Glenn,
    I volunteered to campaign for Rick, before I did an in depth look at each one of the candidates and all the verifiable information I could garner on their true adherence to the Principles of Liberty & our Founders vision for America… Rick Failed. He even said on National TV the other night he voted with the team and against his principles numerous times…that is how he defends his indefensible voting record. % times he voted to Raise the debt cling without requiring coresponding cuts. He voted for Article X… Planned Parenthood, against the Right to work- with Unions/ Davis Bacon Act. etc….No Child Left Behind and government ruin Prescription Industry- the precursor to Obama Care… try again! This is not George Washington…. this is a Progressive pretending to be a Tea Party guy till he gets in…. smells more like Bush every day to me!

  • http://www.facebook.com/bradleeedwards Brad Edwards

    1. Paul is not an anarchist. He’s a Constitutionalist. 2. Did nothing? He got a partial audit of the Federal Reserve which revealed an ADDITIONAL $16 trillion in secret loans & debt. 3. On earmarks, he put earmarks in the bills to get some money returned to his district. However, he voted AGAINST the bills. Therefore, he voted on principle against government spending; however, he ensured that if money was going to be “wasted” he would at least be winning a share of it for his constituents. If any of your favorite candidates did this, you wouldn’t have a problem… because your candidates have done worse, and you overlook it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bradleeedwards Brad Edwards

    Well, you popped off like a know-it-all and couldn’t even get your most basic of facts straight… but we need to listen to you? You call Ron Paul a “lunatic” but you get your feelings hurt when we point out that you were wrong on one of your most basic assertions about him?

  • Anonymous

    I encountered the VERY SAME thing on a site that had comments about Romney talking to a field kind of full of CEO’s and the like.  EVERY comment except for mine was anti-Romney.  It made me feel like…hey ho!  What the heck is going on?  There was not a single GOOD comment about Mitt.  Major manipulation.  Don’t even know if my comment was approved.  Sad…

  • Anonymous

    Santorum  is now leading others in PA with a large margin in clear politics polls. He won for 4 consecutive terms (some of he in slides) in a 70% democratic district until 2006, when the republican brand was hated.
    Many people don’t know what an earmark is and the amount of money spent under earmarks.  Earmark is less than 1% of the US budget. It is legal. The money could be either left to Washington bureaucrats to spend as they wish or given to members of the US Congress to spend on various projects in their states. Both ways $0.00 is saved. We have heard so many abuses of our tax payers money misused by the government. There is no perfection in what a person or a government does. Santorum took a principled stand against it after he observed its abuse. He was the member of the Gang of 7 who exposed the scandals in Congress.  It is good to see at what the candidates has done and intend to do during their life time and then make comparisons objectively. Santorum is forthright in saying politics is a team sport. When a Senator wants to pass a bill (let us not forget we have two major parties with opposing views), some of them add a bill that may not pass on its own to take advantage of a bill that has  majority votes.  If a Senator may not compromise, nothing could be accomplished (gridlock). Without knowing how the US Congress get anything done, simply judging Santorum on his votes show lack of knowledge on those who simply want to oppose him. Requesting and receiving earmarks for not only Utah Olympics but Massachusetts in he amount of about $500 Million and then accusing Santorum as though he had done something illegal is hypocritical on the part of Romney. Consistency does not mean you may not make some some compromises after weighing  its pros and cons. It may not be easy for some to easily understand how the US Congress gets anything done. I hope Santorum will aggressively defend and make clear about some of the issues that were raised during the last CNN debate. If you objectively compare Santorum’s record to any other candidates, Santorum will be far better than all of them and specially  Romney – who some already start calling a pretender-in-chief.

     Incredibly, the New York Times said it best last night:”But Mr. Santorum, unlike other Republican opponents whom Mr. Romney has targeted during this unwieldy primary battle, did not recoil. He returned the attacks as forcefully as they were delivered, arguing that the health care plan Mr. Romney signed as governor of Massachusetts would complicate the party’s effort to criticize President Obama’s health care plan. He also dismissed Mr. Romney’s argument that he balanced the Massachusetts budget.” “Don’t go around bragging about something you have to do,” Mr. Santorum said. “Michael Dukakis balanced the budget for 10 years. Does that make him qualified to be president of the United States? I don’t think so.”With the hard choices we face ahead of us, America does not need another Pretender-in-Chief. We need a leader. Santorum is running as the principled, conservative alternative to President Obama and he is counting on Conservatives, Evangelicals, Catholics, republicans, Independents and disaffected democrats to stand with him in this long and difficult fight.Nominating Romney is giving BHO & DNC a red meat. They can easily mobilize their base because of a lot of his personal and professional baggage (as a Wall Street guy who is part of the 1%). Santorum with his humble beginnings (lived in public housing, from the coal miner grand father) will have the best chance of beating BHO as BHO & DNC cannot carry class warfare against him.When G.W. Bush’s wanted to fulfill his campaign pledge to change the educational system in USA, and as a Team Leader in the Senate, Santorum voted for NO Child Left Behind Program (which he now regrets). Romney has not regretted for Romney Care. He is now trying to be somebody he has never been. Accusing Santorum for insignificant stuff when compared to Romneycare, and his record and shiftiness is totally unbelievable. Whether you agree with him or not, we know where Santorum consistently stand. Can anybody say the same about any one of the other candidates including Romney?

  • paula marshall

    Hi, VegasDad.  WHY do you think you are going to get blasted by EVERYONE???  Do you anticipate something wrong with your message?  If there is something wrong with your message, fix it, so you will not get blasted.  While I TOTALLY like Ron Paul’s stand on the constitution, I think he will make a MUCH better VP than President for now, till he actually learns how DC and the congress/presidency works.  Call it eye-opening experience.  I think he is VERY valuable for America, but I don’t think he can garner enough votes at present to be anything more than a vote-splitter.  Experience will be a real eye-opener in the Presidency job.  We need someone strong enough on appeal (I promise!) in order to be electable as President, and there just are too many dissenters with a few of the things Paul stands for, such as legalization of some drugs, and a naked, do-nothing foreign policy.  We do NOT want another Rwanda, and yes, we are our brothers’ keepers, when they are  being slaughtered by the millions.  – or even by the hundreds of thousands.  WE could have helped there, and didn’t, and about a million people were murdered before anyone actually stepped in and helped those folk. 
    In order to become President, one has to appeal to ENOUGH voters to overcome a third party’s garnering of votes.  Say we have Soetrobama, Santorum as GOP, and Paul as Independent-  ((It could be anyone, -just an example) Call them nominee 1., 2., and 3. and plug anyone’s name in if you wish,.   However, in this example, Soetrobama is 1., Santorum is 2., and Paul is 3.  We vote.  At the final count, since there were THREE candidates, it will not matter that Soetrobama got a low count, to prove America does not want him back.  Soetrobama only got 38% of the vote, and Santorum and Paul TOGETHER got 62%!   Only, Houston, we have a problem…Santorum got 36% and Paul got 26% (or vice-versa) because they had to split the greater percentage of voters.  Therefore basically, even tho Soetrobama only got 38% of America’s vote. he WINS!  HE got the BIGGEST percent of the vote that was available to be divided between the three!  
         Now,THAT is why its important to support a SINGLE party against Obama, even if you are not A GOP voter.  Enough are GOP that any Independent, no matter how sweet s/he is, will merely dilute the vote against Soetrobama, and the cad will win once more.  There are more Repub/GOP voters than voters who are registered Independents, and it will be, if we have three people running for election, enough to divide the Nation’s 100% votes so that Soetrobama’s take will be the higher percent.   We need to nominate whomever has the most electorates who definitely vote for him, without being paid to do so, ( those people can be bought) and whomever has the broadest appeal to the most people, and hopefully know this all before the primaries, and this info on vote-splitting needs to be highly publicized, or we may quickly lose our Nation to criminals who cant even pass I-verify!  So, vote for the GOP ticket, as the lesser of two evils.  Regardless of who gets the nomination!

  • http://www.facebook.com/joshuasteimle Joshua Steimle

    Why do people get down on Ron Paul for not passing any bills while in Congress? Can anyone who believes more bills passed = successful member of Congress call themselves a conservative? Paul has been trying to stop the tidal wave of unconstitutional legislation rather than contribute to it, and somehow this is a problem?

  • Anonymous

    Rhett, your choices were good!  Your idea that Mr. Santorum reminds you of Ron Reagan surprises me…a bunch.  Mr. Santorum is nothing like our image of Pres. Reagan, at least to me.
    I am disapointed the Mr. Gingrich has taken such a beating, but I still feel strongly that he should be our  nominee.  I would very much like to see a debate between Newt and the Pretender.  In my mind I do not think it would be a contest at all.
    Whoever goes up against that “O’ guy will not just be running against him, but all the corrupt organizations that have gotten fatter in the lat 3 1/2 years.

    GOD Bless The U.S.A.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    You are right in the fact that we have all made mistakes but this one is different in the sense this shows you really do not know Ron Paul and are only using maybe some things maybe you have read on here or saw on TV and then just tried to post a comment.  Everyone I deal with who either support or blast Ron Paul at least knows that he has been a Republican in the House of Representatives.  Now I do not think this is a bad thing because this shows that you do not know enough and have just begun to take one side.  I invite you to link into him more.  What is really cool is back in 2008 we just had out Ron Paul supporters that mostly all came as Independents but this time I have long time Republicans who said he could not win back in 2008 now supporting him.  They did the same attacks and this time we decided to have a truce and work together to beat Obama.  We decided that the largest problem was overspending and the candidate who was going to have the best plan to cut spending would be the one we support.  Well this became Ron Paul.  I heard so many times, I agree with him but still not so sure on his foreign policy.  They did their own research and now they are 100% dedicated behind Paul.  Now they are even more mad than I at the GOP because of how they and the media have treated Paul.  So really if Ron Paul does not win the nomination I can not see another candidate actually winning.  I bet if these tactics continue they lose a third of the party.  Several people I am referring to were diehard Republicans with over 20 years experience in the party each.  

    One guy down the street was going to vote Mitt Romney and has been in the party for 18 years.  He is close to losing his house.  I asked him would he vote for the candidate who tried to prevent the housing bubble and collapse?  He did not understand.  I said look man, you are struggling, about to lose your house, lost your business, can not find work, and can barely keep food on the table…  If someone saw this mess was going to happen and tried to stand up against those who allowed it and was running would you vote for them?  He said yes.  I said go look at “Ron Paul Predictions” on youtube.com.  This guy has helped me with polls for my signs that he had left over from his business and he helped me put some really nice Ron Paul signs up.  This guy not only voted Ron Paul but is now sees him as the only one who is honest, with integrity, someone who takes his oath seriously, principled, and will stand up to protect the constitution.

    One more thing I want to mention.  They at first blew him off as  a nobody who could not win.  Said he was unelectable.  Tried not talking about him when he was statistically tied with Michele Bachmann at the Iowa straw poll and he did not have to buy 6000 tickets like she did and give away Randy Travis tickets to get the votes she got.  But when his polls started showing him winning in Iowa the media, GOP, and elite starting bashing him.  They said it would discredit the Iowa caucus if he won.  In the last count it was done in secrecy and 8 precincts came up missing.  They took away the requirement of photo ID and this allowed people to vote in multiple precincts.  There were also more ballots than people voting.  The chairman of the republican party of Iowa stepped down and now there is a Ron Paul supporter who is the chairman.  Nevada chairman stpeed down and possibly soon the Maine chairman.  Man, what a mess in Maine.  Candidates attacking each other is one thing but no one has been attacked in this manner like Ron Paul.  Now why would the elite be so afraid of Ron Paul?  Because they know they stand to lose the most if you put someone who is non corruptible in that seat.  Everything else about foreign policy, newsletters… all BS.  But they do like the sheep using these to attack Ron Paul supporters.

    Most of the people I know are getting so upset with the GOP they are already organizing a huge march against the convention this year and will vote Obama if Ron Paul is not the nominee.  Elections can be ugly but I think this year it is going to be real ugly for the GOP.

  • Anonymous

    Why hasn’t Ron Paul authored any legislation to do this already? Why hasn’t he authored any legislation in his whole career? I have seen this time and time again with incumbent politicians.

    Remember Al Gore in 2000, you had to elect him President before he could do anything. He was the Vice-President of the USA for crying out loud, he had the presidents ear. If his policies were so vital for this country, why didn’t he and Clinton do something about it?

    McCain did the same thing in 2008. You had to elect him president too before he could do anything. He was and still is a sitting Senator. He could write legislation anytime he wanted to solve some of the issues. Even though the legislation he did write was god awful and created more problems than it solved. If I ever have to hear “I was a Reagan foot-soldier, my friend” again I will puke.

    And now we have Ron Paul doing the exact same thing. I cannot stand incumbent politicians that don’t do anything and then claim you have to elect them to a higher office or another term before they can. These are the kind of people that never want to solve the problems because they want to run on them next election cycle. Sure they can talk a good talk but when it comes to results, they fall flat.

    If Ron Paul can’t put together a coalition in Congress to get his agenda through, what makes you think he can from the White House?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DBLFQMMRHVXJ7H4JLA4JY7NEHA Aram

    RON PAUL 2012. THE REST IS JOKE.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    I think Santorum said it best in this last debate “Sometimes you just have to take one for the team.”  And there is a reason why Congress approval is so low.  Because people are more and more waking up to these things.  And whether Ron Paul wins or not we will continue to fight the corruption and replacement of those incumbents in congress who look out for themselves and lobbyists more than the people who hired them to represent them.  Ron Paul was not able to get anything done because he always stuck to his principles.  I have talked to many congressman who talk very highly of him and say he is the most honest guy in Congress.  Even John McCain said this.  It is about time we reward those who best serve us and kick out those who only care about themselves.

  • Anonymous

    Santorum is consistent in his opposition to a government
    intervention in a private sector. He opposes all bailouts. Romney supports
    bailouts for Wall Street but not for Auto Industry. As usual, he is not
    consistent on this and various issues.

    The more people get a chance to understand about the
    substance of that debate, the more they will see that Romney is a looser.
    Romney requested and received earmarks not only for Utah Olympics but for
    projects in Massachusetts (over $500 Million).It is the height of hypocrisy to
    accuse Santorum for the same thing he did. I believe the American people will
    not be fooled by this pretender-in-chief. Santorum on Fox News said that Allen
    Specter promised him to support Alito & Robert to be on the Supreme Court.
    He said he has a press release as evidence of Specter’s promise to do so.  Specter did what he promised (although he may
    now deny as a democrat & Obama supporter). Santorum endorsement of Romney
    in 2008 was based on the belief that Romney was more conservative than McCain.
    He said on America Live with Megan Kelly “Romney has over 300 lobbyists who run
    with him to keep the status quo. Romney’s support for Wall Street bailouts and
    his continuous support for Romney care forced him (Santorum) to change his mind
    regarding Romney. Regarding Team Player statement, Santorum said, I was
    referring to G.W Bush, who pledged to change the American Educational System.
    The No Child left Program was supported by 400 house members’ & 90 Senators
    and also supported by the American people, according to Santorum. Governor
    Romney was for the No Child left Behind Program then and he still has not
    changed his mind while Santorum regrets his past decision. How can Romney
    accuses Santorum for something he supported before & still believes in?
    Romney was for health care, pro-choice like his own mother; gay rights; big tax
    increases (net increase); big government spending. Santorum said he was
    transparent about all earmarks he requested and used. Upon finding earmark
    abuses he supported for earmarks to be stopped. Santorum believes that his
    message is resonating with people in Michigan & Arizona. He expects to do
    very well in both places. My question to all who reads Detroit News is how can
    we say Romney won when he is not telling us the truth about his own record and
    try to distort other candidates’ records because he has money to do so? I hope
    and pray that this time we will not be gullible to nominate RINOs just to lose
    in the general election.

     

    The Establishment is for Romney because they know that he
    cannot challenge the status quo.

     

    in 1976, the Establishment gave us moderate
    Gerald Ford and we got Jimmy Carter. In 1996 the establishment gave us moderate
    Bob Dole and we got Jimmy Carter.Iin 2008, the Establishment gave us moderate
    John McCain and we got BHO.  The
    Establishment now is giving us moderate Romney and we may end up getting  BHO should Romney be the Republican nominee.
    No matter what Mitt Romney would prefer to call himself, Romney is not a
    consistent conservative like Santorum. Is not laughable for Romney to say
    Santorum is not a conservative? Can anybody tell me if Romney has any core
    values that he consistently maintained? Why does Ron Paul runs an ad against
    Santorum while not campaigning in Michigan? It seems to me there is some sort
    of conspiracy between Ron Paul and Romney to distort Santorum’s records .
    Whether we agree with him or not we know where Santorum consistently  stands. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1681781692 Tim Cheney

    Unless a GOP candidate is willing to stop spending more money than the government takes in, then they are in the same category as Obama. Even Ron Paul has a spending cut plan, but if he isn’t willing to stop (or if Santorum isn’t willing to stop) spending more than they have coming in, then they are in the exact same camp as Obama. They are all alternate views of bad spending. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    This was not true before they became illegal.  Drug addiction today is far higher than it has ever been and you can blame this on harsher drugs that have been created to make people more addicted so they have to continue to buy whether illegal or not.  Ron Paul tried to prevent many of the drug laws and he was attacked very heavily but if you go back and look at what he said would happen, you would realize they did.  It is always easy to look at things to day and then say he is crazy for thinking this but if you go back to when these problems were not as bad and he explained what problems would occur and now looking at things we see this is true, just brings a whole new light to the subject.

    People thought he was crazy when he was the only congressman trying to stop the housing and economic bubbles and everyone said he was crazy for that.  Today we see he was right.  Instead of being hateful or focusing on the negatives, try to open up a little and try to better understand it. May take some research on your party since the media is full of lies but in the end you will appreciate the info better.

  • Anonymous

    Some of the comments I have seen about Santorum
    in various places are totally fabricated. Compared to all of the remaining
    candidates, Santorum is the only consistent authentic conservative. Even some
    of his critics admit that he is authentic. I am surprised to see some conservatives
    continue to support Romney or/and Newt after observing their poor judgments and
    persistent unpopularity at the grass root level.

    In politics, likability and less or
    non-political, personal and professional baggage are an asset. Both Romney
    & Newt have a lot of known baggage that could easily be used against them
    in the general election. The establishment (Republican) made a commitment to
    have Romney as a presidential nominee.

    Romney, Newt, & BHO have a lot of things
    in common: Individual health mandate; cap & trade; bailouts; TARP. Romney tries
    to argue that his work in the private sector and as an outsider helps him
    better than Santorum – who worked and lived in Washington before, to grow our
    economy. He promotes himself as a candidate who could fix the American economic
    problem. He may think that the American people may not know that a POTUS cannot
    & will not create or /and grow jobs. A president could create a healthy
    environment through a legislative process by the US Congress for a private
    sector to grow our economy and jobs.

    Whether a candidate is an insider or an
    outsider is less important than what they did or do in areas of their
    expertise. How can we support Romney when his records clearly show that Romney
    care is the basis for Obamacare (1/6 of the US economy)? His statement that
    “I do not care for the very poor”; Republicans say we do not want
    Romney. Thomas Sowell said (…His (Romney’s) Millions of dollars parked in a
    tax shelter in the Cayman Island is red meat for the class warfare democrats”.
    It is silly on the part of Romney and others to say that the most conservative
    person in the race (may not be an ideal of all) is the least conservative shows
    desperation.

     It is
    widely reported that Newt is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
    since 1990. CFR stands for a global government at the cost of national
    independence. In his speech at the center for Strategic & International
    affairs in July of 1995, I have come across a report that says “He
    brazenly admitted his disdain for our founding document. According to the
    report, Newt said “I am for the United Nations”. Gingrich ruined his
    chance through adulterous affairs and erratic behaviors (according to those who
    know him closely). Newt is unpredictable and Romney is unreliable. Why still
    some individuals would like to vote for either Romney or Newt, when the BHO and
    DNC could easily ruin their candidacy in the general? Why do we give to the
    left a red meat for class warfare? The so called moderates (liberals) will not
    win in 2012. If conservatives have not learned from what happened to moderate
    Bob Dole in 1996 and moderate McCain in 2008, they have no body but themselves
    to blame. Relatively speaking, Santorum has a better chance of beating BHO by
    making BHO and his failed policies an issue of the general election campaign.
    The mass media would like us to believe that either Romney or Newt is
    electable. Knowing fully their vulnerabilities, they promote either of them as
    ”electable” in order to carry out their massive and vicious attacks in
    the general to have BHO re-elected.

    Santorum has a family friendly and
    manufacturing centered economic policy that could grow our economy and jobs.
    Not only in social issues is he strong but also in national security &
    foreign policy better than any one of the remaining candidates. Please read
    online his Iran freedom & Support Act & the Syrian Accountability Act
    which he authored in 2004. His humble beginnings (lived in public housing, from
    a coal miner grandfather) with almost no political baggage’s unlike Romney
    & Newt & Ron Paul (with his reckless foreign policy and libertarian
    views, anti-Semitism views and his racist newsletters) make him immune to class
    warfare.

    Romney is applying for the top job in the
    government sector. He was a successful business man in the private sector.
    Santorum is the successful man in the government sector, the sector to which
    Romney is applying for the top job. In the government sector, Santorum has a
    better experience than Romney. He has 8 years’ experience in areas related to
    USA’s national security & foreign affairs as a member of the Senate Armed
    Services Committee. Romney accuses Santorum’s vote for earmarks (something done
    legally) while receiving earmarks for Utah Olympic Games and other projects in
    Massachusetts. Santorum has national security and foreign policy experience
    unlike Romney. Santorum has legal victories in social issues unlike Romney.
    Santorum is more believable unlike Romney & Newt and Ron Paul. Whether you
    agree or disagree with Santorum’s policies, we know where he consistently
    stands. Can any one of you say the same about the other candidates?

    Rupert Murdoch (Owner of Fox News) said
    Santorum is the one with a big idea. The Wall Street Journal said Santorum’s
    economic policy is the one which is bold when compare to that of Romney. Rush
    Limbaugh Santorum has not hurt a conservative cause.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=756508915 Ron Arnold

     ‎”Libertarians have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do. Government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulation low and that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get in…volved in cultural issues, you know, people should do whatever they want. Well, that is not how traditional conservatives view the world, and I think most conservatives understand that individuals can’t go it alone…” -Rick Santorum.I disagree . . . in fact MOST folk feel they’re capable of self-government, except a large handful of those same MOST folks don’t believe OTHER people are capable of self-governance. Those people are called elitist liberals and elitist conservatives. Elitist liberals believe people are too stupid to self-govern and elitist conservatives belive people are too immoral to self-govern. Either way – they’re both about curbing liberty. . . which smacks one whole hell of a lot of hypocrisy – doesn’t it?Glenn – of late . . . I’ve found you to be a bit elitist.  

  • Huss Family

    Yes, it is true…George Washington is not running.  And we’d better put on our big girl(boy) panties and deal with reality – reality is messy, and often not pretty.  Nowhere more so than when it comes to politics.  No candidate out there is spotless, no candidate is perfect – but those people who claim the Republicans are no better than Obama had better do some more studying.  Nothing could be worse for this country than 4 more Obama years.  Unless, of course you like the idea of a world without America and our Constitution, and really want to live in just another socialist country.  Talk to anyone in Europe – they are astounded, especially given their example today, that we would willingly walk down this road that Obama is hell bent on taking us on….selling our birthright for the proverbial mess of pottage.

  • Anonymous

    Jong, The biggest problem is that you detractors have no understanding of the Constitution, which is why you view RP as “bad”. Why do you think more bills are “better”? Imagine what a  free country we would STILL have if all our legislators could only introduce ONE bill during their term.   In your view, ALL of our founders would be anarchists, which makes you a big government STATIST.

  • Anonymous

    Char, RP is only seen as a “lunatic” by those who have no concept of the principles of liberty or the Constitution.  A lunatic is anyone who would vote against their own freedom.  RP is trying to protect yours and you’re too blind to see it.

  • Anonymous

    Romney should have no regrets for the so called Romney care. It should be up to the states to choose things like this and not the Federal Government and if that is what the people of Mass. wanted then they can do that. Mitt has already said this is not for America, but it was for Mass. Santorum has nothing to offer us.

    ________________________________
    From: Disqus
    To: patty_capener@yahoo.com
    Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 3:50 PM
    Subject: [glennbeck] Re: Highlights: Rick Santorum talks economy, controversy, and faith on GBTV

    Disqus generic email template

    woreti wrote, in response to peggy12:
    Santorum  is now leading others in PA with a large margin in clear politics polls. He won for 4 consecutive terms (some of he in slides) in a 70% democratic district until 2006, when the republican brand was hated. Many people don’t know what an earmark is and the amount of money spent under earmarks.  Earmark is less than 1% of the US budget. It is legal. The money could be either left to Washington bureaucrats to spend as they wish or given to members of the US Congress to spend on various projects in their states. Both ways $0.00 is saved. We have heard so many abuses of our tax payers money misused by the government. There is no perfection in what a person or a government does. Santorum took a principled stand against it after he observed its abuse. He was the member of the Gang of 7 who exposed the scandals in Congress.  It is good to see at what the candidates has done and intend to do during their life time and then make comparisons objectively. Santorum is forthright in saying politics is a team sport. When a Senator wants to pass a bill (let us not forget we have two major parties with opposing views), some of them add a bill that may not pass on its own to take advantage of a bill that has  majority votes.  If a Senator may not compromise, nothing could be accomplished (gridlock). Without knowing how the US Congress get anything done, simply judging Santorum on his votes show lack of knowledge on those who simply want to oppose him. Requesting and receiving earmarks for not only Utah Olympics but Massachusetts in he amount of about $500 Million and then accusing Santorum as though he had done something illegal is hypocritical on the part of Romney. Consistency does not mean you may not make some some compromises after weighing  its pros and cons. It may not be easy for some to easily understand how the US Congress gets anything done. I hope Santorum will aggressively defend and make clear about some of the issues that were raised last night. If you objectively compare Santorum’s record to any other candidates, Santorum will be far better than all of hem and specially  Romney – who some already start calling a pretender-in-chief. Incredibly, the New York Times said it best last night:”But Mr. Santorum, unlike other Republican opponents whom Mr. Romney has targeted during this unwieldy primary battle, did not recoil. He returned the attacks as forcefully as they were delivered, arguing that the health care plan Mr. Romney signed as governor of Massachusetts would complicate the party’s effort to criticize President Obama’s health care plan. He also dismissed Mr. Romney’s argument that he balanced the Massachusetts budget.” “Don’t go around bragging about something you have to do,” Mr. Santorum said. “Michael Dukakis balanced the budget for 10 years. Does that make him qualified to be president of the United States? I don’t think so.”With the hard choices we face ahead of us, America does not need another Pretender-in-Chief. We need a leader. Santorum is running as the principled, conservative alternative to President Obama and he is counting on Conservatives, Evangelicals, Catholics, republicans, Independents and disaffected democrats to stand with him in this long and difficult fight.Nominating Romney is giving BHO & DNC a red meat. They can easily mobilize their base because of a lot of his personal and professional baggage (as a Wall Street guy who is part of the 1%). Santorum with his humble beginnings (lived in public housing, from the coal miner grand father) will have the best chance of beating BHO as BHO & DNC cannot carry class warfare against him.When G.W. Bush’s wanted to fulfill his campaign pledge to change the educational system in USA, and as a Team Leader in the Senate, Santorum voted for NO Child Left Behind Program (which he now regrets). Romney has not regretted for Romney Care. He is now trying to be somebody he has never been. Accusing Santorum for insignificant stuff when compared to Romneycare, and his record and shiftiness is totally unbelievable. Whether you agree with him or not, we know where Santorum consistently stand. Can anybody say the same about any one of the other candidates including Romney?
    Link to comment

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     Earmarks and returns are two different things.  One deals with the federal budget the earmarks are other spending.   If you listen to your self and the hypocrisy of Paul blaming one person for what he does himself.  And he has done nothing in Congress period.  Ignorance seems to follow both him and those who follow him.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

    I do understand the Constitution and I also know what Paul stands for.  I have read his books and over thirty years I have observed him first as a student then as a instructor his reading of the Constitution is just that no true understanding of who wrote it and why.  More bills is not better but, Paul has no friends not even in his own party he is widely regarded as a crank.  And for your stupidity certainly shows.  Our founding fathers where what can be called free thinkers.   Paul and his ilk are the illuminati willing to take violent irrational action no meaning just rants and raves.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     And Paul would accelerate the process.  But, as I have said before legal is not free crime would go up massively.  But according to Paul if its not in the Constitution you can have it.  Just as bad as Obama who would allow nothing Paul would give you everything just as bad.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     No, however if you can not even get something done while in congress you will not get anything done in the White House.  Paul has not tried to anything Constitutional or not he has been a Libertarian twit who even after Ronald Reagan said something nice about him went into a rant and rave against both him and Abe Lincoln.   Paul is a fruitcake with nuts.

  • paula marshall

    Ok, that was as clear as mud, I’ll bet.  Basically, in order for Obama to LOSE, we all have to band together and vote for the GOP Nominee, as the only sure-fired solution to oust Soetrobama.  Even if your guy doesn’t get the nomination, whomever your guy is. Otherwise, we lose, because Soetrobama doesn’t have the Democratic party’s votes split between two candidates, but the GOP/ Independent tickets of America do have to split the other half of the votes, if a third party runs.  WE only have to make SURE the person who gets the GOP nomination isn’t a Soetrobama fan in secret.  That is the only thing we have to see to before we nominate, then simply vote for the GOP, to make sure we have more votes than the Soetrobama fan Dems.  Mere logic.  There aren’t all that many Independents.  There maybe not as many GOP as there are Dems, either, but, TOGETHER, we have them licked, especially if we count in any Usually-Dem voters who do not want to see America dead, and vote off their party.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

    I agree but watch out for the blank eyed Paul bots.   They do not understand just like their great leader.  Paul has for years been a Libertarian and the Founding Fathers would be the first to lynch him.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     Paul is not border line on one thing.   That is the ability to read a piece of paper with out any knoweledge of it .   He claims that he is a Constitutionalist he is not.  He likes to refer to a document that he uses like a club with our feeling or knowledge.   He is like a police officer who stops you for speeding to a hospital while bleeding to death.  Yes officer I am speeding  Well  this paper says this and that and here is your ticket.

  • Anonymous

    I have to admit that I am jealous you got to meet Ronald Reagan. Reagan was not perfect(nobody is), but he embodied so much that was. He was a father/grandfather figure to the whole country and you knew he had the best intentions and policies. There was no doubt he loved this country and his fellow Americans. When I heard Michael Reagan(who was adopted) tell the story a few years back of how Ronald Reagan never told anybody his son was adopted, always introduced him as his son, I thought that spoke volumes of Reagan’s character as a man.

    I was also sad when they smeared Herman Cain. I still can’t believe people bought that load of crap. They destroyed his campaign but they didn’t destroy the man. Herman Cain is one of the reasons I have a problem with Santorum. When he attacked Herman Cains 9-9-9 plan, I wasn’t to happy with him or his tax plan. Art Laffer the man behind Reagan’s economic policies helped create 9-9-9 and now is endorsing Newts 15% flat tax plan. I trust Art Laffer’s economic opinions more than anybody else, especially politicians.

    There are only two real conservatives left in this race, Newt and Santorum. Both are not perfect conservatives, but at least they are conservative.

    Don’t let the Lame Stream Media or establishment discourage you from voting for who you think is the best, no matter who it is.

    P.S. Don’t worry about the Paulbots, nobody takes them seriously anyways. They are just fun to argue with and when Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination, they will go back to Obama.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/JMBDPHYCD4JE4PQYI5IEUZ6M7Q mollie

    If Santourm cuts medicare and medicade he will be another Obama. Their is so many of us old folks that need medicare, we have worked all our lives. We sure cant afford to buy insurance. They need to look around at all the people that are getting big pay cheks cut their salarey down to 40,000. or 50.000. what a normal person they dont need all that money they can draw a modest salarey like the taxpayers.  As Rommey said he would cut salaries and clean house. The congress votes them a pay raise that should go to our service men who put thei life on the line so we could injoy the freedom we have. My Husband suffered all his life from shell shock. I know what they go through, and it isnt plesant to see them suffer. my prayers go out to them.  m.m.h

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     Char may not have been right in the small things however, he is right in that Paul is a lunatic period.  If you need an explanation then read his books I have they sound like some one unhinged

  • Anonymous

    Well, I walk between the American Independent and the Libertarian.  They both have good in them.  Maybe more so the America Independent.  I do believe that our Constitution has been amended to death.  I do believe that our government helps to promote racism.  I do believe that the states need to be able to govern themselves more.  I do believe that when the American people vote on bills and pass them, the State Supreme Courts have no right to over ride them and call it unconstitutional.  The people have spoken, period.  I do believe in an across the board tax percentage for both Federal and State with no more deductions other than cash donations for non-profits.  I do believe in eliminating the IRS and our Federal government reducing their size dramatically.  Let the states govern themselves more and reduce our deficit.  We do not need all of these agencies.  I believe that the Federal and State governments need to regroup and condense and streamline more.  Even if it means layoffs.  I do not believe the unions belong in our government from cities to federal.  I do not believe one cent of our tax dollars should go to our public employess or elected officials retirement funds.  They need to contribute to their own, period.  I believe ALL public employees and elected officials should have the same medical, dental, vision, retirement (401K), short and long term disability, etc., and pay for at least 50% of the premiums.  I believe if a government employee or elected official lives in a state with State disability that they should be required to pay into it so that the state’s tax dollars pay less.  Our tax dollars should not be paying 100% for anyone.  I believe we need to put America and Americans first so we can rise above all that our elected officials have taken down.  I believe we need to close our doors and borders to any further immigration.  We have taken in too many.  We need to get our feet back on the ground as a Nation.  I believe anyone not legally in this country has broken the law, period.  There is no DREAM for them but the prompt return to their own country.  I don’t care if their children were born here.  They can always come back when they are 18.  I think that’s enough for now.  I believe in the 2nd amendment.  NO AMENDMENT IT.  This keeps us the strongest nation in the world.  Not only do we have a great military, but the people can stand up to defend our great nation.

    I grew up an Air Force brat.  My parents are rolling over in their graves at what our country is coming to.  I am a patriot before anything.  God help those who help themselves.

  • Anonymous

    Santorum never voted as a conservative in the House or the Senate. I vetted all candidates months ago and know their background and history.  Maybe Santorum can pull the wool over the eyes of some but not me and others . I would never vote for Santorum.

  • Anonymous

    Does it bother you that George Soros is admittly endorseing Mitt Romney and has ashurded
    the East that there would be little difference between the two.

  • Anonymous

    You do make some very valid points.  The only one I have a problem with is having the Supreme Court  not overriding a law that the people voted on.  If it is against the Constitution then it should be overridden.  The rest of your post is awesome. Thanks for tkaing the time to write it.

  • Anonymous

    I first met Ronald Reagan when I was a teenager. He gave me a piece of advice that I stuck to for the rest of my life. He told me that I would be successful in life if I never asked anyone to do something for me that I wouldn’t do myself. That is what you build character on……..

  • Anonymous

    Not true at all.

  • Anonymous

    Great interview last night. To many people are hung up whether Rick is “conservative enough.” But they are missing the bigger picture. Family is THE most important issue facing America today. If we don’t have a strong moral conviction and a strong family, nothing else even matters. I applaud this man’s courage for talking about “unpopular” issues. It’s just too bad that the country has moved to far away from all this to even care.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    You seem to think if it were legal there would be more drug use.  But history has shown the opposite to be true.

  • Anonymous

    Why do we accept an individual mandate at state or federal level? Federal and state governments should not be allowed to run our health care. And individuals should choose their own coverage based on their own free will.

  • Anonymous

    SANTORUM SHOULD TALK  ABOUT HIS AFFILIATION WITH SAITAN-HIS VOTING TO RAISE HTE DEBT CIELING FIVE TIMES-HIS PHONY/VRONY SMILE AND HOE  HE –  LIKE OBAMA DECIECED THE PUBLIC.  SON’T TRUST SANTORUM–  HE’S ANOTHER POLITICAL MOTHER  –  HE’S A NIGHT MARE READY  TO HAPPEN  –  COMPARING HIM TO STALLIN WAS QUITE CORRECT  DEBT SLAVERY FOR HIM WOULD DO JUST FINE AND HE CAN’T SAY MUCH GOOD FOR HIMSELF SO  HE’LL PICK ON HIS APPONENTS INSTEAD’  –  HE IS A PHONY—  DON’ TRUST HIM..

  • Anonymous

    Famly is important but not as important as the economy and the debt we are in and how close to socialism we are.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    People like you are destroying the Republican party.  Usually the two parties go through their nomination process and then during the general election try to appeal to the independents to win.  But because so many independents want Ron Paul they registered as Republicans where needed to vote for him because they realized that if they didn’t he would not be the nominee in November.  So by pushing him away and talking complete lies like this you are causing the GOP to lose.  Why would anyone listen to your lies and BS and then eventually vote the nominee.  If most of these folks vote Obama the Republican party will lose by a landslide.  Evidently you are a Santorum supporter and pissed at what Paul said but at least he said it to his face and Santorum’s voting record made Paul’s point.  Which is why Santorum said he had to take one for the team.  You can be mad that the truth came out but you can not change the truthful history.

  • Anonymous

    I think it should be mandatory for  every candidate to have a psychiatric evaluation to make sure they are mentally okay to even fill the position as our President I do not think that is currently done?  Also I think they should have to answer there Questions taking a lie detector Test. How can we put anyone in a position of such importance and not do that?  If we truly want to protect our self and this country we need to be able to trust our leader and that has to be earned, There is no Room for any mistakes, Any comments anybody?

  • Anonymous

    I think that is really going way to far and is not necessary. Gee half of the psychiatrists are crazy themselves.

  • Anonymous

    it is assumed that when they put their hand on the bible and swear to uphold the constitution, we take them at their word.    Guess that isn’t enough, is it?

  • paula marshall

    Hey, Jong.  Regardless, as I mentioned already, it does not MATTER if you like Paul.  It DOES matter if Obama gets re-elected.  So, regardless of who gets nominated, it only makes sense to vote for the GOP nominee, so long as it isn’t Obama 2.  IN other words, this upcoming election isn’t about getting our guy in the office, it is ALL about getting Obama OUT.  So, lets ALL set our personal preferences aside, and come together for ONCE, so we dont have to split our non-Soetrobama vote between 2 candidates! 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Jong, Ron Paul did not get much done in Congress because he did not take one for the team like Santorum.  This is what is destroying the country and people are figuring that out.  Your ideas can not longer be supported.  This movement is what led to the Tea Party because the over spending from the bailouts and to get control of the government back to the people.  However, today the Tea Party is in shambles and all over the place.  But the dedication of Ron Paul supporters will keep the battle going.  The GOP thought we would go away after 2008 and instead we got stronger and bigger.  With or without Ron Paul we will continue to grow into the next election as well.  Because there is just too much corruption in Washington.

  • Anonymous

    So, anyone who likes Ron Paul is a bot? And you are better than the person you replied to how?

  • Anonymous

    Well according to some, unless it’s a certain person, they aren’t voting because they feel it’s a vote for Obama anyway.   The logic does not fit mine, I will vote for the Republican nominee.

  • Rex Whitmer

    Though Paul may be a little overboard on some items, in the main he is correct.  If you want to be free then you must live free.  When you become kept, whether by a government or a sugar daddy, it or he gets the power to tell you what you can or can not do!  I’m old enough to recall what it was like before medicare.  The main thing was that medicine was affordable to the common citizen!  Doctors could charge what they wanted according to what they felt was correct.  You have seen since George Bush’s No child left behind the results of the Fed getting into education.  MY wife was a teacher and it took more time to fill out the Federal Forms and jump through their hoops than it did to teach the kids.  The Fed has not shown itself better than what we had before FDR.  We didn’t have people dieing instead of little snails before the environment became more important than the people who lived in it!    It’s government’s job to provide safety, an armed forces to protect the country, to estalish a legal currency.  It should speak for the people, not command them!  We are fast becoming serfs, unable to provide anything without the government’s permissison.

  • Anonymous

    Oh please, this more B S from a mental midget. Who else in congress is wanting to follow the Constitution even when it does not suit them? People like you are the problem with this country, you keep voting for the same idiots that got us into this mess in the first place and expect a change.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    It is just too bad Jong does not get it.  He says many in the party think of Paul as a crank.  I see more and more Republicans starting to get Paul and do not think that.  The tides are turning and will continue to do so.  Right now Paul has the second most delegates and maybe this makes Jong mad because his candidate is losing to Paul.

  • Anonymous

    If that were the only problem!     I could handle cutbacks;  what I can’t handle is living in a communist country.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    They have released their medical records.  But if they do something really crazy we can just impeach them.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, don’t worry about the Pualbots even though no Republican can win without us Libertarians. Keep letting the same drivel drop out of your pie hole, you sound exactly like the left ing idiots you supposed dislike.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe you are just looking in the mirror. You sound like a lot of Americans, you do not want to have an honest conversation about the prolems our country faces. Keep your head firmly planted in your as s, that seems to be working great for you.

  • Anonymous

    How about NO. You may think getting Obamao out is the only thing that matters, but some of us realize that putting in the same establishment lackeys (from both sides) is exactly what got us into this mess in the first.

  • Anonymous

    The only people who think that are the ones who do not want to have an honest conversation about the problems our country faces.

  • Anonymous

     well it should be but since that causes so much controversy  these days I think we need to find to another way to make sure, sad that that is how it is.

  • Anonymous

    Agree and I am truly concerned that people believe that anybody can beat Obama and that is not true at all.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Government control and over taxation is why our ancestors came to America.  Government was also in control over religion.  The founders tried to set this government up based on all others before that had failed before so that this one would be less likely to.  But we have allowed this government to slip into everything and destroy the very foundation of which made this country so great, freedom.  I have been around the world and I still think we have a great country but what I see today is scary because we will make things harder and harder for the people to take back control of this control as the government becomes more and more powerful.  All one has to do is go to the FBI website and look up their policy for domestic terrorism.  It is pretty scary.  We have the Patriot act, and almost had SOPA, PIPA, and NDAA.  These are still not off the table and we need to watch closely or else they will slip in with some other bills.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RBSZ4UK3GM3RKPMDNUQQ3RQ62Q Stan

     Ron Paul NEVER said he wants to legalize drugs.  California is an excellent example of Ron Paul’s position.  Here in Ca we can legally purchase marijuana, but the Federal government comes into the legal marijuana places and arrests people.  That does not make any sense.  Ron Paul thinks the Fed should get their nose out of the States business.  (And, the Fed should get their/our nose out of everyone else in the world’s business.)
    As to passing any bills, the question is:  Isn’t it better to have tried to stop bad legislation and not been successful, than to have been successful passing bad legislation? 

  • Anonymous

    You pretty much have stated the obvious.  Anyone with half their brain tied behind their head (not certain if that’s how Rush says it) knows a third party split is political suicide;  let’s hope no one in the GOP does it.

  • Anonymous

    maybe it sounds hard but there are many psychiatric disorders that would make someone incompetent to become a leader of a country

  • Anonymous

    There’s a good chance our man Ron Paul does not get the nomination.   Not voting should not be an option.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Jong is only upset and concerned about his social security.  Just so you know Jong, Ron Paul is not going to take your social security away but we will work to wean the U.S. off of the failed program.  Will take years.  But it is not fair that you get it because the younger are paying in for your benefit and they will not get it.

  • Anonymous

     What ultimately needs to be done is to repeal the Seventeenth Amendment. One of the biggest reasons we are in this mess is because the balance has been upset. The states lost their representation in congress. The House represented the people and the Senate represented the states. All this amendment did was turned the Senate into another House of Representatives. Before, when the House pandered and tried to buy votes with tax payers money, the Senate more times than not would strike it down.

    Unfortunately, I don’t know which one would be tougher, repealing it or to get Obama to tell the truth. Both are almost impossible.

  • Anonymous

    It is true that Americans need to be taught to think right. Unfortunately, it is much easier to listen to the main media and be brainwashed than it is to think over details on candidates. Americans need idols to follow, whether it be in sports, entertainment or politics. They look for the best looking candidate, who impresses most, who speaks the best etc. Instead they should be analyzing the character of the candidate and what he/she stands for. The media, including Beck, can easily skew their views to their own advantage and proclaim truth! Most candidates say things for one purpose only, and that is to be elected. That’s why so many promises are promised only to be thrown out the door once elected. Americans voted for change, but Obama never truly described what changes he had in mind for Americans. It was way easier to blame Bush for America’s ills than to define a course to correct same.

  • Anonymous

     Yea you nailed me. I am really a leftist. At least I know how to spell your candidates name. Pualbots?

  • Anonymous

    There are not enough conservatives to vote for Santorum.
    We need the Reagan Democrats and Independents.
    Santorum will not get their votes. That is the truth.
    God Bless

  • Anonymous

     Good advice

  • Anonymous

     Blah Blah Blah! All you can do is call names like the Paultard you are. Wow, look I can do it to. That must make me special like you.

  • Anonymous

    CharRBel, I ran across this site that opened my mind. http://www.christianworldview.net/2012/what-is-wrong-with-libertarianism/ as to what a libertarian really is and then there is http://www.jashow.org what is a mormon’s belief about the Christian Church another eye opener.

  • Anonymous

    Whats your problem, don’t you any crack to smoke with Ron Paul. 

  • Anonymous

     Look at the state of our Country? how crazy does it have to be?

  • Anonymous

    What ultimately needs to happen is for Americans to “wake up”, stop their obsession with sports. Its like everyones watching basketball while Washington burns…. The Romans did this and look what happened.

  • Anonymous

     It’s you libertarians that can’t win without us. Why do you think your whiny kooky geezer came running back to the Republican Party after he lost as the loosertarian in 1988. He couldn’t even beat George H. W. Bush for crying out loud.

    Why are you even voting in the Republican Primary if you are a libertarian and think republicans are so bad? I will tell you why, because you and your radical libertarians destroyed any credibility the Libertarian Party ever had. So in order to win an election, you have to infiltrate another party. You are to the Republican Party what communists were to the Democrat Party. A radical group that infiltrates a party then destroys it from within. In other words a fith column.

    Please name one accomplishment Ron Paul has achieved while in Congress?

  • Anonymous

     maybe it is bu
    t dishonest people would be exposed a lot sooner and other issues would be resolved or answered way before it would lead to deeper trouble.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    You do realize Jong that he should be getting anything done in the White House that Congress should be doing.  It is very sad that you have to go against your morals, character, and principles to get something done.  I have heard people say they believe Santorum would be best because he believes we need to teach the importance of family and morals.  But how can you do this if you have to take one for the team just to get anything done in Washington.  This old way of doing business must stop and why in the future people like Paull will get more done while they rest get replaced.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Jong, I watch the Glenn Beck show on the founding fathers and I believe you are completely wrong on this.  First of all lynching was for when people were traitors and gave details of what we and our soldiers were doing to the British.  If these people were discovered they were lynched.  Are government gives more money to Israel enemies and I am not so sure how that is suppose to work.  We tricked Saudi Arabia so we could put a base there which according to the 9/11 commission report (free download) ticked off many Saudis include Osama Bin Laden.  Our founding fathers were trying to design a system that would keep government small and out of people’s lives.  If anyone would be lynched it would be Newt, Rick, and Mitt.  And you really know that but for some reason get a kick out of tearing down Paul.  Anyone to try and distort the truth of a Christian like Ron Paul who is the most honest man in Congress represents evil if you ask me.  And I though the Santorum folks were suppose to be more religious but instead you speak so much hatred.

  • Anonymous

    Anyone that advocates such wild conspiracies is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    You could not give peace a chance in the 1970s due to the blowback from the many things we had done before.  It is the reason so many want death and destruction to the USA.  How can Santorum talk about us trying to help those who want democracy in Iran when he knows we over threw their democratically elected government back in 1953.  We screwed Iran big time.  Then we played both sides between Iraq and Iran causing many more deaths between the two countries.  We also gave those weapons of mass destruction to Iraq to use on Iran of which Husein did do and then later on the Kurds.

    We can not protect our borders and so this country is weakened.  Terrorists can come right across our borders just as easy as the drug lords.

    Protecting our country is one thing, preemptively attacking others for false allegations does not make mud more safe.  Just makes more enemies.

    If you think doing that makes us more safe then at least ask yourself this, where are all the allies we use to have, where are the other countries who are helping us, and why do we insist we are helping Israel when they have over and over they do not need our help?

    If America is promoting peace then why did we overthrow the Iranian government back in 1953 and why have we proped up so many dictators over the years?  money, power, and corruption…  no wonder the muslims think we are Satan

    If we the people do not stop this tyrannical government then we are part of the problem which makes us just as evil.

    This is on Glenn Beck blog so worthy of bringing these things up because he has mentioned some of these things himself on his programs.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    If we continue to replace the corrupted Congressman then the more honest representatives could get more done but in a more positive manner.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Which problems are you referring to?  Top three in the country are government over spending, economy and jobs.  Ron Paul wants to cut a trillion dollars from the real spending which means he is taking on one of the top three issues Americans are concerned about.  Most Americans are also tired of TSA and the wars.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    I agree, but the solution is understanding the problems.  Washington does not want you educated in history or with the problems.  I wrote Senator Bill Nelson a couple years ago telling him I wanted him to support the Audit the FED bill.  His response to me was that an audit would cause wide spread panic if the people knew how bad things really were.  We got a partial audit which showed the 16 trillion dollars we gave banks interest free and 5 trillion dollars of that were to foreign banks.  Ben Bernanke recently said anyone keeping money in savings will be screwed and that people should invest into things like properties because they are going to cause in total 33% inflation.  The idea here is that this of course will inflate housing prices back up again.  But at the expense of a loaf of bread now costing $5.  No telling what gas will go up to.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Well if honesty is what you want then your candidate is Ron Paul.  I have been a long time supporter of Ron Paul and have been to Washington numerous times.  Most Congressman will tell you that Ron Paul is the most honest person in congress.  John McCain even said this.  He does not believe they should be paid when out of session and so he returns part of his salary back every year.  This year he returned over $100k back.  He also said he would be president for the same salary as the average American, $39k a year.  Now how many other candidates have you ever heard in history every do what Ron Paul has?  They are not talking as nice now but since the last election Ron Paul was also invited on more news shows than anyone else.  Michele Bachmann use to go to lunch every Thursday with him because she looked up to him a lot and wanted to learn more… but then she turned on him and decide to run herself.  Look at how nice her introductions of Ron Paul were back before they both decided to run for President.

  • Anonymous

    If FAMILY is that important (and I think it is)  we should all get behind the man who LIVES his family values, doesn’t just talk about them.  Mitt Romney is also the only candidate qualified to be President.  He has the Experience and the Leadership skills that this country has been crying for since the day the incompetent, narcissistic bozo was sworn in. 

    Go Mitt!  On to Victory!

  • Anonymous

     Not one bit!  George Soros will do ANYTHING to try and prevent the one person they are terrified of running against, from gaining traction.  Too late.  Mitt Romney is back on top and will win Arizona and Michigan and go on to sweep Super Tuesday.

    Go MItt!  Our 45th President of the United States of America.

    Bub-bye, Comrade Obozo!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    I think if you like family values and morals that should look at Ron Paul more closely because he is for this and came up with a solution to Roe vs. Wade that could work.  But more importantly he also understands the many other problems we have that Rick has no clue on.  I remember in the beginning of the debates Rick kept attacking Ron on Iran, the others stayed away fro the argument at that time but about the 5th debate Ron brought up the 1953 coup and Rick shook his head as if he had no clue about that.  He then laid off and did not bring up foreign policy again until some time later after Michele said he was dangerous.  But really she was desperate for votes.  Look at this last debate towards the end how Rick, Mitt, and Newt banned together on foreign policy and kept kicking Ron.  But I think Ron still came out on top of that.  I especially liked how in the post debate interview with Ron Paul where John King admitted that Ron Paul was actually in second place with delegate count.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    My biggest fear of Mitt is that there is so much insider trading happening now in government and they are lining their pockets with millions of dollars, Mitt I feel will be a part of that.  Some say he has the most money and friends with money so he is the best to go against Obama but this is not true.  Just because he has money does not can he would so freely just blow it so he can beat Obama.  Plus Mitt’s money does not coe close to what Obama can get.  Power is in the numbers.  I have vowed to donate the max for Ron Paul.  If just 500,000 enthusiastic Ron Paul supporters donate the max contribution in the general election Ron Paul will have more money than Obama and Mitt combined.

  • Anonymous

    I am sorry to tell you this, but Ron Paul, as admirable as he may be to some people, will NEVER win the Republican nomination and will NEVER be President of this country or any country.  He has a few good idea’s but not enough that will propel him to the White House.  He does NOT have the leadership skills nor the Executive experience to lead a nation.  I wish all the Paul Groupies would get over it and get behind a viable candidate who can actually throw Obama out of the White House.  Ron Paul would be a pushover for Obama. 

    The only candidate who is qualified to win the presidency and who can actually beat Comrade Obozo is Mitt Romney. 

    He will be our nominee after Super Tuesday and he will have my vote all the way to the White House.

    Go Mitt!

  • Anonymous

     Nor will I.  Santorum was voted one of the most corrupt Senator’s by some Conservative Think Tank.  You can Google it if you want their name. 

  • Anonymous

    From what I’ve read in the comments posted already it seems that no one can beat Obama and everyone has already pretty much given up on the election–no matter who the GOP candidate is.
    If that’s true and Obama is re elected then these United States of America will disappear as a nation . It will become part of a United Nations,European,Global world government. It will not resemble anything (for those over 50 that can recall what it was like to live in this country 50 yrs a go) that America once was.
    When Obama is relected there will be chaos,roits,anarchy, and civil war as well as food shortages,inflation,and a host of other changes that will rip this country apart. And that is exactly what the liberals,progressives, communists, socialists,etc want.
    Start preparing now–stock food,water, ammo,guns,etc–if you want to survive–if you don’t think this will happen then rely on the government to take of you. For those of you that remember Katrina—
    you know how that worked out. This not just about the election of a president ,but the future of this country, For those 50% that are already on welfare and the 50% that don’t pay taxes–it probably won’t matter to them what happens— Uncle Sam is their “sugar daddy” and they are already getting their Obama money. Obama,Nancy, Harry and all those czars, supreme court justices,federal judges,union bosses will be just fine.They will continue as they have been with the graft,corruption ,kick backs, political favors,insider profits and all the rest to live in a life style they are accustomed to. Christians will be rounded up and put in re education camps because they can’t be trusted.Anyone who opposes the government will be labled as traitors and charged with treason.
    It doesn’t matter if you don’t believe it or disagree cause that is just what” they” want you to do.
    Keep on watching Basketball or NASCAR or whatever and pretend everything will be ok–Auntie Obama in Boston will help you.

  • Anonymous

     Dream on, Larry.  Dream on.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Mitt may very well win the nomination but he will not win against Obama.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    And I am sorry to tell you Mitt will NEVER be President.  What is your qualifications that you think Mitt has?  Already has money, friends with money, lobbyists, knows how to work the system and be a ten player like Santorum said.  Mark my words Mitt will not be President.  I will not take the slighter lesser of two evils.  If this is the choice that is force on me I will just vote Obama.  You are going to be just as depressed as those who supported McCain back in 2008.  I bet you thought then McCain would win also.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Ha ha ha, what a crazy person you are if you really thin Mitt has a chance.  Gave me a good laugh since you think we are just going to fall in line and back your candidate.  There are even more Republicans/Independents/Democrats this time backing Paul and if not Paul the GOP will lose by an even larger landslide in November then they did in 2008.  Back then many of us voted third party but many are already coming together to back Paul and if not him Obama.  This will greatly reduce the Republican vote while increase the Democratic vote.  The only way Mitt will win is in your dreams.

  • Anonymous

    The smell of Bush would be better than the smell of Obama

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    This shows right here that Kegan05 is in the wrong place and not even commenting to now.  Glenn Beck is highly against Soros and Kegan5 seems to not be bothered at all.

  • Anonymous

    LARRY,
     WHAT PLANET DO YOU LIVE ON?
    ARE YOU A PARENT,ARE YOU EMPLOYED, HAVE YOU EVER BEEN IN THE MILITARY, DO YOU LIVE IN NEW YORK, CALIFORNIA,MASS OR CHICAGO,?
    I REALIZE THAT  WHAT YOU WROTE IS JUST AN OPINON-BECAUSE NOTHING YOU WROTE CAN BE BACKED UP WITH FACTS AND FIGURES TO MAKE YOUR POINT VALID.
    YOU NEED TO DO A WHOLE OF RESEARCH BEFORE YOU MAKE  ALL THOSE ASSUMPTIONS.
    SORRY ,BUT WHAT YOU SAID MAKES NO SENSE.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    This government is more and more trying to take our rights away.  If we can not get Ron Paul as president and taking into consideration of what Glenn talks about all the time, the economic collapse, we should just all vote Obama and hope the rubber band snaps sooner while we still have some rights.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Seems like you are more concerned about beating Obama then the actual problems this country faces.

  • Anonymous

     Alcohol is a far stronger and more debilitating drug than most street drugs and it is more addicting than most. It is legal for adults over 21 years of age. The drug “problem” is a medical one and we don’t lock up alcoholics for possession or because they are addicted. We do, however, lock up bootleggers. The so-called “war on drugs” is misguided at best and more likely just a sinister money making industry. Our law enforcement resources could be put to far better uses than kicking down the doors of non-violent people. Ron Paul is no lunatic. You have obviously not spent any time listening directly to him and must get your information about him from the lamestream media who distorts his message at every turn. I respect Glenn Beck and am a devout listener but even he distorts Congressman Paul’s message at times.

  • Anonymous

     Glenn, as a committed listener and GBTV subscriber, I have heard you praise the founding fathers and the Constitution ceaselessly. Please clarify how Ron Paul’s foreign policy differs from that of the founders and how its basis is unconstitutional.

  • Anonymous

     Most of the societal problems with drug addiction are caused by the high prices as a result of the fact that they are illegal. There is a certain segment of the population that will develop chemical dependency regardless of the law. Alcohol is legal and many people use it responsibly and some become alcoholics. Other drugs are the same except that lives of responsible users can be ruined just by the mere fact that the substance is in their pocket. This should never occur in a free society.

  • Anonymous

    Glenn, First of all the SS and medicare are not entitlements. People worked long hours and paid into this for years. The entitlements are the checks and free medical care for illegals who have not paid into the system and the folks on welfare who are using the money to purchase drugs. If they cut the ss and medicare what are the people who get 400.00 or 500.00 a month going to do? Each year we are charged more for medicare and still have to purchase other insurance.

  • Anonymous

     You obviously have not been listening to Congressman Paul or you would have heard him say repeatedly if we are going to go to war, go to Congress and the people, get a formal declaration of war, go in and win the war and get out. He is not a dove. He is the ONLY candidate running who has ever served in the military and he receives more donations from active military personnel than all the other candidates, including Obama, combined. Check what you hear from the media (including Glenn) against what Dr. Paul ACTUALLY says and you will find that his message is continually distorted by the lamestream media.

  • Anonymous

     For instance?

  • Anonymous

    I agree, You said what I believe  very diplomaticI believe that Obama has no regards or respect for our elective system and that he will declare himself a dictator. It quite threatening. do the people care?

  • Anonymous

    I do like Ron Paul’s economic ideas, but that is it.  We are not loners and have to think about our alias.  We will not be able to withdraw and not help Israel.  We ALL need to vote for whoever is nominated for the GOP runner…. don’t listen to the negative stay positive and vote that is one vote Obama doesn’t get and it counts.  VOTE VOTE VOTE that is what my Dad, brothers, husband, brother-in-law and my son-in-law, and my grandson has fought for and is still fighting for.  Remembering our country 50 years ago inspires me to get out and VOTE.  We won’t ever get that back, but prayerfully we won’t lose it either.  Let’s be true Americans and do our part.  I dare you!!

  • Sandie

    I found his statement “Turn on your TV and start reading.” quite amusing. I must be in a silly mood because I pictured someone reading his TV because of the way he said it. Quite a communicator eh? HEHEHEHEHEEE

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    June1969, The PM of Israel has said it multiple times that they are a sovereign country and they do not need our money or troops to help them.  They want to handle this situation themselves.  I am guessing you meant to say allies.  Just how many allies do you think we have now a days?  Even Beck has talked about this many times that we are more and more alone.  I am a true American, I have served my country and been to the Gulf twice.

    Was the 1953 coup about spreading peace?  No, it was about oil for Britain.  Was propping up so many dictators over the decades promoting peace?  Nada.  No wonder we have so many enemies, I am just surprised we have not seen more blowback than what we have.

    We have been privileged for so long because we have been protected from our own government by our constitution.  But this is being eroded away every day.  Go look at the FBI website under domestic terrorism and it may shock you.  It says on there anti-government activities is domestic terrorism.  Speaking out against the government can be terrorism.  Patriot Act, SOPA, PIPA, NDAA are all signs of something worse coming. Soon we will feel like Iranians by our own government and there will be nothing we can do about it.  Could be 5 years away but if something is not done soon it will happen.

    I take it that you are old enough based on what you said that you are probably retired.  You should very seriously consider what Bernanke said recently about keeping interest rates low for another 4 years and they want 33% inflation on the dollar.  Your retirement savings will become less and less much quicker.  Well that is if you have retirement savings because not all do.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    I was chatting with a guy earlier today because he had a really nice $1299.00 cub cadet lawn mower and selling it for only $550.  He told me someone was already coming and wanting to buy it but that he would let me know if the deal was done or not.  Sadly the guy did buy it.  I asked him why he was selling this so cheap and it was so new, he said to help pay some medical bills.

    I know there are probably more people here for Santorum or Mitt than Ron Paul but I do believe back before government was involved with medical insurance things were much better.  There were many more hospitals that would take you even if you did not have insurance.

    You are along with many people now dependent on these programs.  And it sounds like you are struggling.  Really sad if you only get $400-$500 a month from SS because I know a kid down the street who can work but drinks too much and so they gave him disability and he gets like $2700 a month.  He does no work and perfectly able to.

  • Anonymous

    Jong- did you read my talking points, or not??? The numbers and statistics suggest that you are WAY WRONG about your assertion that legalizing drugs would lead to theft or child abuse! DO SOME RESEARCH! Try prohibition, Portugal, and then compare it to the numbers here in the US. It is soooo easy to debunk your silly claim, that its laughable. Im sorry but you claim to be a student of history, that you have fallowed congressman paul for thirty years, yet your talking points are simply progressive arguments that history has done a flawless job of exposing as failed. But again Dr. Paul is trying to save us from a collapse of our nation due to debt, NOT legalize drugs. It is simply the moral argument he makes that you CAN’T defeat. He’s only predicted and fought to defeat a collapse for 30 YEARS! Years you claim to have followed him! If you have followed him for that long, then what in Thomas Paines common sense is wrong with you that you can’t see whats going on??? I don’t know your heart, but You sir are dangerously close to being viewed as a political plant, or a very naive individual! Or is it your wish to talk about drugs in order to detract from the real message, the message of saving the republic and restoring liberty! Good day sir!

  • Anonymous

    I read that… I didn’t comment, there comes a time when I have to turn HIM off…LMAO.

    He’s like listening to a pesky fly, a whining drone in the back ground, until it gets too annoying then SPLAT!!

    You smash that sucker flat,,,lol! ;-D

  • vieteravet

    Ron Paul’s foreign policy is a losing one.  If he got the nod I’d vote for him, but I doubt it.

  • Anonymous

    I would tell us the same thing Larry if I were in the PM shoes, most certainly can’t count on Obama for help.  They don’t need our help right because they are God’s chosen and he’ll take care of them.  I feel that we have been blessed because we have been in alliance with Israel for over 50 years.  I am not retired I do work just like everyone else and pay my taxes just like everyone else, so I can most certainly say what I think –  so for I have that right.  I may not after November if we don’t get someone in that office that can take the reign and get us going in the right direction.   Our country was founded on Christianity and that means helping our allies which at this time is our one and only Israel no one else likes us or has respect for us.  Chill out!

  • Anonymous

    It’s pretty obvious Santorum doesn’t have a clue. Obama would chew him up in a debate.

  • Anonymous

    I gues you don’t realize Bush was the puppet who set the precedent for what the puppet Obama is doing now. Bush started us down the road to tyranny with the Partiot Act. Obama is merely continueing down that road until the next GOP establishment puppet, like Santorum, Romney or Gingrich comes along.

  • Anonymous

    I’ll agree with you in part. I don’t think Bush was the puppet, but he certainly started us down the road. I don’t beleive that tyranny was the purpose of the Patriot Act, but obama has made it that way.

  • Anonymous

    ChaRBel, you must be on crack! Ron Paul does not advocate legalizing drugs.He advocates the de-criminalization of certain drugs and treating drug addiction as an illness, rather than a crime. In addition, Ron Paul is not a Senator. He is a Congressman and serves in the House, not the Senate. As for your claim, “If he gets the nomination Obama will surely win reelection,” the last national poll I saw showed Ron Paul defeating Obama by 7 percentage points (Ron Paul 49% to Obama’s 42%). Other than Romney, the other three GOP candidates didn’t even come close. 

  • Anonymous

    I suggest you do some research into the policies of our nation’s Presidents over the past 50 years. If you really want to know the truth, ‘m certain you will find as I have, that we haven’t had a President who wasn’t a puppet for the global, corporate elite since Eisenhower, except maybe Kennedy and Reagan and we all know what happened to them. Kennedy was assassinated and an attempt was made on Reagan’s life. Just look at Kennedy’s executive orders and plans to deal with the nation’s currency, the treasury and the fiat money of the Federal Reserve System, just weeks before his death. Examine the policy changes in the Reagan administration after the assassination attempt. I’m sure that will explain. In other words, Ron Paul just may be our last hope to restore our Constitution and take our country back from the wana-be dictator puppets of the tyrannical global, corporate elite. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     Having a free country is wonderful isn’t it….oh wait your trying to claim that is a bad thing it appears???

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     The only thing Larry had wrong was we do now have the NDAA, it passed over the New Year holiday

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     LOL @ “did nothing in the House for over 23 years”  I would like to THANK YOU for emphasizing the main focal point of Ron Paul’s campaign as he is not responsible for the complete mess this country as he stood alone in opposing the ridiculous deficit spending the other two members of Congress did, just as you quoted the OTHER TWO candidates where responsible for “doing everything” to our current nations screwed up standing!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     Santorum said Santorum is a fake….”Listen folks even though it was against my principals I had to take one for the team”

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     @ Jong  you summarize Dr. Paul the best!  You are correct he doesn’t have many friends in congress, he doesn’t get many bills passed that he favors, he does vote against many of the bills that are presented….all FACTS….however, the person that is crazy is you as you are referring this is a bad thing and the current process and state our country is in is under your premise that it is working and a good thing……

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     I guess you would lynch Glenn Beck too then as he confirmed this at the 4:40 mark of this link

    http://youtu.be/cYIP8lGBtFQ

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     Glenn does it here>>>http://youtu.be/SXUBDT75jyI   After this you will realize GB only says what he does to promote his self interest, that must be the why he supports Santorum lately….

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

     You are a communist…period

  • http://twitter.com/paoligarcy Paolina Garcia

    So then elect Ron Paul who polls the best against Obama and who can win over independents and anti-war democrats (since Obama is Bush III).

    NO conservative can support the wars overseas. They are TREASON!

    Glenn doesn’t see that Rick, Newt, and Romney’s plans are to give TRILLIONS to rebuild the middle east.

    Those muslim soldiers Rick, Newt, and Romney support training will BETRAY us.

    Does anyone here believe the shiite Iraqi army will support us against shiite Iran? We’re going to have to bomb the very country Rick, Newt, and Romney supported spending trillions to rebuild!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    If your paranoia had any basis in reality, would not Paul get assassinated?

    You really believe that John Hinckley was part of a conspiracy?  LOL!  Alex Jones has poisoned minds. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Like Beck, Santorum is a severe reactionary harking back to the thinking of the Dark Ages.  It’s why mainstream conservatives like Mayor Giuliani (and I’m no fan of this guy) are pointing out that Santorum (and Beck if he has his way) are making the Republican not (that’s NOT) a modern Party.

    That’s the reason Obama would crush Santorum;  he is out of touch with modernity and modern values.Beck has said that he hates (his word) Republicans, and apparently he’s doing his level best to destroy the Party. This attack on contraception is long settled everywhere BUT the church of the Dark Ages, the Catholic Church.

    It’s too early to predict the outcome in Nov., but it looks like the President is going to get re-elected.  If Santorum is the nominee; Obama could skip the debates and just use his superPAC to point out how out of touch Santorum is.

  • Anonymous

    Paolina, we’ve tried Isolationism in the pre WWII 1930′s. It doesn’t work! It cost us and the world millions in lives and treasure in the end game. If Paul could articulate a more cost effective solution other than Isolationism someone might listen to him. Isolationism doesn’t solve problems it simply passes a bigger problem to the next generation or future leaders.

  • Anonymous

    You better be sitting down when the votes come in.   The govenment needs shaking up and the only thing your guy can shake is a malted.

  • Anonymous

    I like Rick Santorum and I agree that the Obama administration will do something to try to negate the elective process.  This truly IS THE ELECTION that will make or break America. It is NOT TO LATE though.  People MUST get engaged.  It will be a hard fight but it MUST be fought. DON’t GIVE UP! 

  • Anonymous

    Listen to the song “CALLING ALL ANGELS” by Train

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkEEjfdxWoc

  • Anonymous

    There are several times where someone like you puts out a statement, perhaps as outrageous, get’s feedback and then doesn’t respond.  Who are you?    Does it scare you of the possibility and so you need to demean,  hoping what you say sticks?
    Just so you know, the growd here are savvy Americans with a vested interest in our country.    Don’t mess with us, it won’t end pretty.

  • Anonymous

    You are an idiot. It was not isolationism that gave rise to Hitler. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin and Mussolini were borne from the ruins of Europe after the Great War.

    If the US had not intervened in the First World War then there would have  been no Versailles treaty.

    FDR wanted war with Germnany and Japan. FDR had cut off all resources to Japan that left the latter economically crippled. The Japanese attack was not a surprise attack.

    Leave Iran alone. The sanctions are going to hurt the innocent Iranians and not the rulers.

    Stay out of the Middle East. Cut military spending. Let Israel sort out its own problems.

    Isolationism has not been tried in the US since the Mexican American War.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6IQU7ZYKVBSUNM75L5IKCXGE3M explorer

    None of these guys want to run on any issue or have a plan for anything all they want to do is run each other down and be negative .

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-McGaugh/100001154573793 Karl McGaugh

    I am surprised that Santorum has so little grasp of the
    financial fraud going on.  His thoughts of government control of religious
    freedom are disturbing.  His demeanor about government spending is to cut
    entitlement programs but keep the power to control the culture the same. 
    This scares me because I see a huge government police state already in place,
    and Santorum is blind to it.  He has lived a privileged life and doesn’t
    see the cage that separates us (the people) from his privileged political
    class.  Statism is still his cup of tea.  He just prefers a different
    flavor than Obama.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Whether you are a RP fan or not go check out this video.  This was on MTV and really good.  There have been over 100 songs written and produced about RP.  Many have music videos.
    http://youtu.be/QiKh9Ko3mw4

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    You say it is not too late though.  Too late for what?  If you are talking about turning this country around then you must have someone who understands the financial and congressional corruption problems.  If you lose focus of this for other things like Iran for example then you are turning your back on America and this country will continue to degrade.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    It is very possible that he could be assassinated and he knows that.  One of the reasons he is one of the bravest guys on stage talking about this stuff.  If suddenly he got some serious momentum he could be assassinated before even becoming president.  But if you kill the one person who gives hope it would cause an even larger uprising than what we have already seen in the freedom or tea party movements combined.  It would be a lot like the shot heard around the world.

  • Anonymous

    Let’s look at the whole picture . This so called Government has been playing their games for along time. In the ’60′s there was a movement that was turned into FEAR! A protest was helded on the campus of Penn.State. What did our government do??? Gunned them down!!!! Did we hold our Government responsible????? Nothing was done!!!! We were turned into drug addicts and sex addicts,greedy PIG! Lead away like sheep! This country was founded on faith! Knowing who we are! Children Of THE LIVING GOD! Wake up and realize who you are. Do NOT give your power away. Stand in it!!!! Get the bums out of OFFICE. GET ALL OF THEM OUT!!!  They are all Politicians.All liars and deceivers! No not one has the truth in them. They know who they are and they benefit themselves with wealth and power over the People. Are we going to lay down and let them do it!!!!!! Stand Up and know the TRUTH: Be STRONG! WE are the children of the Most High Father,Creator,OUR SAVIOR! Ask and He (IT THAT IS) will guide your steps.Seek first the Kingdom of Yehweh(GOD) and all good things will be added to you. Ps:37:12-15 The wicked plot against the just and gnash upon him with his teeth. The LORD shall laugh at him: for he sees that his day is coming.The wicked have drawn their swords, and have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and the needy,to slay such as be of upright conversation. Their swords shall enter into their own heart, and their bows shall be broken!                                       

  • Anonymous

     Well said. I agree 100%. Stand brother, I am right beside you!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

     Well said. I agree 100%. Stand brother, I am right beside you!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Our country was founded by Christians and they were very clear to separate church from state.  The best thing they did was give us inalienable rights (God given rights) as a way to keep the government from ever becoming too powerful and being able to take those rights.  But today they are and so things are going too far.  I do not think Christianity should be attacked and I do believe in some ways it has.  But so has our country and our constitution.  In Christianity about a third believes Israel time has already come and past, some feel the time is now, and some feel it is still some time in the future.  It is not clear cut even by Christians as to if Israel should exist now or not.  But if I search through the bible I can find hundreds of verses against war.  Killing innocent civilians in Iraq with no basis just does not sound like something God would endorse.  If we want to talk about morals and family values to make ourselves feel good then we should understand that these people over there are just trying to do what is best for their families also.  Israel has one heck of a military and over 300 nukes themselves.  They are not afraid of Iran.  If we are really concerned about Israel then why give much more money to Israeli enemies?  Why not listen to and respect their decisions?  Why did nearly all of congress want to condemn them back when they took out Iraq’s nuclear facility and Ron Paul was just about the only one who stood with Israel?  Because it is not about our relationship with Israel.  The answer is going back to the 1953 coup, it is about oil and Britain.  I heard Piers Morgan the other night say we must be the policeman of the world and we must attack Iran.  No one stands with us anymore.  IF so, who?

  • thelionoftruth

    If you are with me; You are with God! Follow me.

  • William Pagano

    The wording of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court License to review Federal laws and to judge their constitutionality. Not laws of the States, who have their own set of Supremes. This has been one of the greatest corruptions of the Constitutional enumerated powers!!

  • William Pagano

    Men to that Brother. let the Senators once again be appointed by the States.

  • William Pagano

    Sports, Games, TV, etc. to bend a phrase, is the opium of the masses.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    I do agree with replacing government.  However, you should go look at the FBI website and then go to the domestic terrorism website.  You talking about Lord and replacing of government can be considered extreme.  If the NDAA had been past (and it is not over so it may still come) you could be indefinitely detained without a laser forever.  This is how they will continue to get away with the things they want in the future, by force.  Why else would they be trying to pass such legislation?  I am not lying to you, it is on the website and you should go look at it.

  • Anonymous

    Huhn, Vicky22, I seem to remember that kind of thinking being present in all of the recent past as well?

    And no one is debating contraception Vicky22, you just don’t seem to get the argument.

    And now you’re trying to pass yourself off as a prestidigitator, again…

    You are such a retard…

  • Anonymous

    Appeal to ridicule

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AKSCNCWRKBZVDXLY645UG2IH5E Vickie

    The other day I read a news article that stated Iran had sleeper cells in the US and they were prepared to attack if the US attacked Iran. The article and the following comments were outraged at the gall of the Iranians. I’m sitting here thinking, Iran is telling us that if we attack them they will attack us. And there are Americans that feel that just isn’t fair. We’ve been watching way too much Fox news.

    For those of you who are screaming, “But they are building nuclear weapons!” Let me just remind you of the “weapons of mass destruction” we were told Iraq was building. The people that told us of those weapons are the same people scaring everyone today about the “nuclear weapons” that  Iran is building.

    Of course, if memory serves me correct, I don’t think they found any WMD’s but they were successful at protecting our interests in the oil over there.  So it wasn’t a complete washout. Of course, then again if you were a parent of one of the Americans killed during that war, you are probably questioning whether cheaper oil was worth the cost.

    Personally, I’m not so ready to go to war in Iran because DC and the corrupt media tells me Iran is building nuclear weapons (by the way, go hear everything Leon Panetta said about that and you would probably question the whole thing too, because he did NOT say he thought they were building one).

    When the men and women in Congress are ready to send their sons and daughters to the front lines for these wars, then I will listen to them about the need for a war. I’m not willing to sacrifice my sons so someone somewhere makes a fortune on oil. 

  • Anonymous

     Larry, thank you for your reply to my post. The FBI or NDAA doesn’t scare me.
    The only thing they can do is kill the body. GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!!!!! NO FEAR!!!! I stand for truth. Truth is, they have no power!!!! Only if you decide to give them your power!!!! I belong body,mind and spirit to MY FATHER!!!!! Not man, not government, Yehweh my creator,my salvation,my LIFE!!!! Let them chew on that for awhile!!!! And choke!!! Ps;72:14 “He (Yehweh)
    shall redeem their soul (life) from deceit and violence: and precious shall their blood be in his sight.NO FEAR ,Oh,death were is your sting!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000027362521 April Marie Stephens Tempel

    Have these videos been taken down? It is just a black screen with no play button.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AKSCNCWRKBZVDXLY645UG2IH5E Vickie

    Not only do they not appeal to independents, but they don’t appeal to many Republicans. I have been a Republican since I started voting 35 years ago. I have always been a conservative. Fox News drew my attention to Ron Paul simply by lying about the results on their debate polls. I wanted to know what there was about this man that made them want to hide him. I fell in love with everything he stood for. I’m still scratching my head, wondering why Beck would not endorse him. But, that’s not for me to worry about. I found my candidate.

    Since then, I’ve seen the Republican Party committing voter fraud throughout the caucuses, cheating him of his votes. I am really shocked at how blatant they are with it. They make ACORN look like the boy scouts. When this election is over, my days with the Republican Party will probably be finished too.

    I am voting Ron Paul, and if the Republican Party manages to steal his nomination from him, I will write him in. Every Paul supporter I have talked to says the same thing. This party has disgusted me, and I refuse to vote for the man that managed to cheat his way in. A crook is a crook, republican OR democrat.

    The Republican Party needs the independant vote in order to win. Without Paul they will not only lose that vote, but they will lose many of their “tried and true” Republican voters too. By the way, not only am I a registered Republican, but I am a delegate too. I’ve spoken to a lot of other delegates and every one of them have the same opinion I do.

    Wake up, people. The Republicans gave us The Patriot Act. They can bring this country down just as fast as the Democrats. Take a good look at them, they are every bit as corrupt. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Very well, you do not fear them.  And that is probably good for now.  My point though is that the government is trying to position itself where they can silence you or take you away.  You may be fine with that and maybe you do not fear them.  We have to do everything we can to stop this from happening because the government is certainly not God and they should not be able to tell us what to think, how to act, even if they think it is anti-government.  Heck, if anyone should fear anybody it should be the government fear the people.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AKSCNCWRKBZVDXLY645UG2IH5E Vickie

    Larry, what did we see more of when we were in the school system? If your school was like mine, we saw a lot more drugs than alcohol. Making something illegal does not stop its use. It just pulls it underground and gives organized crime another way to make a buck. 

  • Bill Tilghman

    More and more you display what a ridiculous clown you are. Why do you bother – most sane folks would not engage in your sort of vendetta, but your headlong pursuit of it is a classic display of the narcissist tendencies of those liberals who think everyone should listen to them and abandon the conservative.

    You are a textbook case, get some help before you hurt someone, even if that includes yourself.

  • Bill Tilghman

    The real paranoiac here is you. Your mind is poisoned by the reek of your own farts.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    With the current members who are active in deciding the nomination it is very true that he will not get the nomination.  But when RPs polls put him in the lead in Iowa look how the media and the GOP treated him and Iowa voters.  They said it would discredit the Iowa caucuses.  No one but Ron Paul had that attack and it happened because they were trying to stop people for supporting him.  In many ways these and other media attacks/blackouts worked.  8 precincts that were strong Ron Paul precincts in Iowa disappeared after the secret last vote.  That chairman stepped down.  The Nevada chairman stepped down.  And probably the Maine chairman may be stepping down soon.  Yeah, I guess when you look at it like that and take everything in, there is no way Ron Paul is going to win.  But is that what you want, the GOP deciding for you who the acceptable candidates are?  I do not think the foreign policy is a losing one if you look at it as a whole.  One of the big proponents of the foreign policy was John McCain and even he said we have to cut back because it is just costing way too much.  I am not so sure giving billions of dollars to Israeli enemies is a good thing when our own infrastructure has plenty of issues.  I do appreciate your honesty though and because I agree with now seeing how they will do anything to prevent him from winning but I can not just sit around and watch them make the decisions whether we like it or not.  Thanks.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Hi Vickie, I agree.  These wars are so far away that the deaths just become numbers with little meaning.  There was no proof of ever needing to go into Iraq.  All the top brass have said that but some delirious people out there still think there was and are now saying those WMDs were moved into Syria.  This is not true and just preparing people for the next battle after Iran.  The WMDs though at one time did exist because we gave it to them along with a lot of money and other equipment.  We wanted him to use those WMDs on the Iranians and he did.  He then later used the rest against the Kurds.  Horrible acts against humanity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Ron Paul’s critics continue to note that Paul seems to reserve more scorn for Rick Santorum than Mitt Romney at the moment. Does this mean the Paul camp is somehow pro-Romney? Or in “cahoots” with Mitt, as people continue to speculate?Hardly.Most observers agree that throughout this election there has been Romney and the campaign to become the anti-Romney, with Romney being the moderate, establishment choice and the anti-Romney being the conservative, anti-establishment choice.If Republican voters are already supporting Romney then they’ve already made peace with his big government, anti-conservative record. Newt Gingrich wanted to be the anti-Romney, until conservatives could no longer ignore that Newt’s big government record wasn’t much different from Mitt’s. Santorum now wants to be the anti-Romney. The problem is Santorum is every bit the big government politician Romney is. Mr. “politics is a team sport” Santorum was literally a water carrier for the GOP establishment throughout the last decade and then some.Throughout January (and before), Ron Paul pointed out how Gingrich differed little from Romney. Paul now points out how Santorum is no different from Romney.Only Ron Paul is drastically different from Romney, Gingrich and Santorum, with a limited government record that is without compare. The other candidates never attack Paul on his record because they can’t.Paul’s primary task at the moment is to remind conservatives that the latest supposed anti-Romney, Santorum, is no conservative.And once Paul becomes the anti-Romney, then we’ll finally see the war for the heart and soul of the Republican Party that needs to happen. If Romney thinks it’s tough debating phonies like Santorum and Gingrich over who has a marginally less big government record, wait until Mitt has to face the only Republican candidate who has no big government record.There has been only one anti-Romney in this election the entire time. Ron Paul’s job at the moment is to remind conservatives of this otherwise glaring fact.

  • Jacobus brogly.decap

     www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcg4TyyP5KU
     Video script excerpts: [ emphasis added ]

    ” … Rick Santorum is a pro-life fraud.

    “In 97, Rick Santorum campaigned for the abortion-promoting governor of
    New Jersey, Christine Todd Whitman. Governor Whitman has deep
    associations with radical abortion-supporting groups, Republicans for
    Choice and Republican Majority for Choice. In fact, Governor Whitman was
    an active proponent of partial-birth abortions.”

    “In 2004, Senator Santorum actively campaigned for radical abortionist
    Senator Arlen Specter instead of pro-life [ CCL: ??? ] Congressman Pat
    Toomey of Pennsylvania.”

    CCL Notes: 1) Christine Todd Whitman is also member of the New World
    Order’s Jesuit-ruled, Council on Foreign
    Relations (CFR)
    2) Senator Arlen Specter switched parties from
    Republican to Democrat in 2009.
    3)

    Arlen Specter is also a 33rd Degree Mason
    “Pro-life” fraud Rick Santorum campaigned for partial-birth abortion
    supporter,
    CFR-member Christine Todd Whitman for NJ Governor
    “Pro-life” fraud Rick Santorum campaigned for pro – abortion candidates
    Christine Todd Whitman and Arlen Specter.
    December 28, 2011

  • Jacobus brogly.decap

    Ricky boy talks about the economy,..,ok Rick..,, so you are not  just another moneyprinting Kenesyan?

    Oh wait…

  • Anonymous

    Who will?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    That’s intelligent there cow poke.  You do realize that your childish comments only reinforce our view that Beck is followed by a bunch of ignorant, immature and gullible reactionaries, right?

    Bill; the shoe fits.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Oh look; Benny, the racist, learned a new phrase in law school this week!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    That’s the pissed off 11 y/o that we’ve come to expect from your.

    I get the argument; so did Obama which is why he adroitly outmaneuvered the reactionaries. Most in the Catholic church accept his compromise, but a reactionary few, a tiny of Dark Age thinkers like you, Beck and Santorum, just don’t accept contraception.  Santorum admits this; you’re just a dishonest Satanist pretending to be smart but, as always, failing miserably.

    Case in point: why the hell would any WANT TO try to pass oneself off as a “prestidigitator.”  That just makes no sense!  If you’re trying to use a word you learned in magic class this week; you failed miserably…again.

    Pretty much what I expect from a pissed off 11 y/o.  Why does “Benny” operate as a sock-puppet?  CAUSE YOU’D GET LAUGHED OUT OF SCHOOL IF PEOPLE FOUND OUT WHAT YOU TRY TO DO FOR MR. BECK!

  • Anonymous

    Wrong Vicky22. They don’t teach you about fallacies in law school…

    You are such a retard!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    No one would waste a bullet on that chimp.  He’s better to have around to laugh at, even if his sheeple aren’t in on the joke.

  • Anonymous

    Who mentioned Beck?

    You are such a retard, Vicky22!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Paul does not have to worry about getting assassinated because he will never get close to having any real power.  

  • Anonymous

    Vicky22, you’re a misanthropist!!!

    Calling anyone a chimp!!!

    You are such a retard!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    That’s the pissed off 11 y/o who would embarrass Beck if he took time to read the nonsense his sheeple spews on his pages.  Instead, you’re just a coward without the balls to ID yourself.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Awe, little boy; you haven’t gotten that far in your schooling; that’s all.

  • Anonymous

    Vicky22, you are not a prognosticator…

    You are a retard…

  • Anonymous

    Oh, that old saw? Vicky22, you are too stupid to recognize the value of anonymity…

    You are such a retard…

  • Anonymous

    Vicky22, you’re making yourself look stupid, again…

    You are such a retard…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    I edited that.  Responding to the ‘new” comments makes it difficult to know what the context is sometimes.  I thought I was referring to your cult hero, Mr. Beck.  He is a chimp.  Paul is just a throwback to the 1st Gilded Age, the period Beck astonishingly defends.

    You act like a mentally challenged fascist (aren’t they all), and you think I’m a misanthrope!  

    Word: I don’t have mankind Benny.  I hate racists like you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    LOL.  Projecting again?

    You can’t behave like an 11 y/o, pissed off brat and accuse anyone of looking “stupid.”  God; you’re so pathetically transparent.

    Again, you are a sock-puppet because you’d get laughed out of college for defending the likes of Glenn Beck.  

  • Anonymous

    Aw, Vicky22, are you lonely? Responding to me directly is a violation of the rules, isn’t it?

    Vicky22, you are stupid, and definitely a misanthrope!!!

    You are so retarded…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    That’s my point dillweed!  So long as you’re anonymous, you don’t have to accept responsibility for defending a liar, hypocrite and propagandist.  It keeps you from becoming a laughing stock.

    NOTE:  I’m not ashamed of criticizing the liar and hypocrite you do handstands here and on my blog to defend.  You’re such a buffoon! 

  • Anonymous

    You don’t have any idea what law school is all about…

    You are such a retard…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    You keep acting like a pissed off 11 y/o child, and I’m supposed to take you seriously?

    GMAFB: you’re a childish joke.  Newsflash for you Benny, the cowardly racist, Hill: Beck is not a prognosticator either.

    Keep making me laugh.  I love mocking morons.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t care what you think Vicky22. Haven’t you figured that out yet?

    As far as Beck goes, who mentioned Beck?

    You are trying to predict the future Vicky22, thus, you are trying to act as a prognosticator.

    You are such a retard…

  • Anonymous

    Vicky22, you are too stupid! You think you are going to goad me into telling you who I am, don’t you?

    You are such a retard…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HSJULSAVFJIJYR6PCTCUPMNXRA Take 2

    GREAT NEWS! My
    dad (brain washed via cnbc) heard Rick S on a BIG 3 explaining the Rev. Wright
    - Barack Obama not aware of lie-GD America! Moreover, agrees that it would be impossible
    not knowing and staying 20 years.  Kudos
    Rick S. for exposing in a trustworthy way on big 3…!   

  • Anonymous

    He is cranky…so am I.    I am sick and tired of being taken advantage of by a government that doesn’t stand by/with the Constitution.    That’s all I ask.   Obama is sticking it to our citizenry and no one in Congress seems to care.    How does one branch over ride the other two?    What will it take for the other two branches to collar the executive?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    No; I don’t. I want you to know that you’re a coward and would be a laughing stock of your university if anyone knew who you are, writing and acting as you do, i.e., like an 11 y/o, pissed off brat who never gets his way.

    See, dillweed, you’re wrong again.  You have balls the size of the moon to call me stupid, but a BB for a brain.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Beck predicts the future all the time, but you NEVER take issue with him or any of the large number of truly idiotic comments that people leave on this site.

    Double standards much?

    “I don’t what you think Vicky22.”  First day using English there sock-puppet?

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky22, reread it again and respond like someone who actually read what I wrote…

    You are such a retard…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    You obviously have no idea what maturity is about.

    That’s cool; we expect Beck’s minions to act like childish a$$holes, and you’re a model in that regard.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    You obviously have no idea what maturity is about.

    That’s cool; we expect Beck’s minions to act like childish a$$holes, and you’re a model in that regard.

  • Anonymous

    Vicky22, when are you going to realize that Beck isn’t part of this conversation?

    You are such a retard…

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky22, you’ll just have to try again…

    Totally irrelevant. totally missing the point…

    You are such a retard…

  • Anonymous

    Perhaps it’s time to try something different since all else has failed…..just saying.

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky22, you’ll just have to try again…

    Totally irrelevant. totally missing the point…

    You are such a retard…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany
  • Anonymous

    Judge Napolitano says it best.   There’s a person I trust.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    That’s the pissed off 11 y/o who would embarrass Beck if he took time to read the nonsense his sheeple spews on his pages.  Instead, you’re just a coward without the balls to ID yourself.
    Want to get laughed out of college Benny, the racist, Hill?  Divulge your identity.

    You won’t. Instead you’ll continue to project your low IQ (demonstrated with your pissed-off-11-y/o-shtick) onto me with your absurd insults and false assertions.

  • Anonymous

    Hyperbole and exaggeration, Vicky22…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • Anonymous

    Amateur ploy Vicky22…

    You are dumb as a post..

  • Anonymous

    I saw the interview on GBTV-I wasn’t happy!   He has a beautiful family and Karen is sweet.  I thought I’d vote for Rick, but something turned me off to him.    Something is off and I can’t put my finger on it.

  • Anonymous

    Vicky11, downgraded from 22…

    You officially qualify as dumb as a post…

    There’s a fence somewhere missing it’s post Vicky11…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Benny, the racist, Hill loves to attach me like a pissed-off 11 yr. old, but he has yet to explain why he wrote “…a wretched individual such as Beck” as a comment on my blog, The Glenn Beck Review.

    Once a liar; always a liar?  What is it Benny?  You think Beck is “wretched” or are you just a liar?  How about a mature, honest answer for a change?

    (I won’t hold my breath waiting for that.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Nice try racist, but it’s not my argument.

    Got any honest observations to make racist?

    C’mon: You think Beck is “wretched” or are you just a liar?

  • Anonymous

    Oh, but Vicky11, I did explain it… You just refuse to accept the idea it was sarcasm…

    And just what do you think you’re accomplishing by trying to make that into anything other than what it was?

    And, when was it? Where was it? Prove I said it, Vicky11…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t say it was your argument, Vicky11…

    But since you cited it, and presented it in support of your argument, you aligned yourself with it…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • General Kota

    Something is off with all of them. I am getting a bad feeling about all four of them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Wall/1112166239 Larry Wall

    Interesting discussion from Fox News.
    http://youtu.be/0Wp7CudNnBc

  • Anonymous

    You do realize Christians think God is the only One that sits in judgement of others, don’t you?  

    You spread lies like a good butter knife.    Add some jelly and you have a sandwich without the peanut butter.

  • Anonymous

    So, if Ron Paul surges ahead, does this mean he will be targeted?     As far as I can see, Romney is the only one without a bulls eye on his forehead.   Isn’t that strange?

  • Sandie

    Do you realize that your obsession with Beck makes you the laughing stock of the internet?

  • Anonymous

    Nuhuhn, he’s Beck’s most critical critic who critiques Becks’ critical critiques…

  • Sandie

    He will never realize Beck isn’t part of it. His obsession won’t allow it. It is obvious the way he repeatedly introduces Becks name into this and other conversations that his psychological problems have a strangle hold on him.

  • Sandie

    You are the liar here Vic, you took what he said in sarcasm (like you do with most things people here say) out of context, and used it to portray something else. That is dishonest. That is typical of you because you are dishonest. You are a liar. That is not an ad hominem attack on you, it is the truth. so your little “Once a liar; always a liar?” nonsense describes you to a T. You aren’t fooling anyone here with your blather and misrepresentations.

  • Sandie

    ….LMAO

  • Anonymous

    Indeed, and now he’s going to think that’s a threat, the euphemism “strangle-hold”.

    He is as dumb as a post!!!

  • Bill Tilghman

    Your idiocy is only exceeded by your foolishness. You are ignorant, immature and gullible for buying everything the liberals say. You have been conditioned quite well and you follow the party line like a good little useful idiot. What will happen to you when you are deemed no longer useful?

    By the way, gutless one, you are leaving more childish comments every day, so you must be a reactionary, by your own definition.

    Keep on dancing, maybe that boiling water you are in won’t seem so hot, froggy.

  • Anonymous

    So you decide to show your maturity by acting like a P/O’d 56 yr old with an inferiority complex for 11 year olds? Hypocrisy much?

  • Sandie

    Then he must immediately call the FBI on his psychological problems that have a strangle hold on him. I can’t wait to see the outcome!

  • Anonymous

    Oh, I bet he’s got them on speed-dial…

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky11, you never take issue with being a bigot…

    You are as dumb as a post…

  • Anonymous

    Hi Larry I’m back.  Just wanted you to know that the bible is full of killings,  men, women and children, livestock, etc., that the Lord  gave  his disciples his blessing and  that he would be with them and they conquered.  There by giving the Holy Lands to the 12 disciples.  The people here in America  have been brain washed by this government and don’t see anything wrong with what Obama is doing.  We have a choice and in the end and it is coming it is not going to be pretty – but Israel with win!  So it is written in the Bible and so shall it be done!!!  Thanks for your service by the way, forgot to thank you in my last comments.  Have you checked into any benefits through the VA – I am a retired Veterans Service Office of 10 1/2 years.  Might have something there.  Thanks again!   Oh, I am working……not retired just from my County job.

  • Anonymous

    Romney doesn’t have any bulls eyes because the House Republicans and Democrats want him to be nominated.  He won’t stand a chance with Obama.  I am telling you Newt is the only one that can debate him and win the debate, but the House and Senate don’t want him so we will lose either way. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shameer-Mulji/1685212657 Shameer Mulji

    Hate to break it to you but none of the effin clowns running for the Republican nomination can beat or have what it takes to debate Obama.  He makes Gingrich, Paul, Romney & Santorum look like trailer trash.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah I agree, but give it some time. We have all seen championship boxing matches and the damage caused by the exchanging blows, when landed, they often daze the opponent . It may take a few rounds before the numbness wheres off, before the contender regains their composer.

    I think Santorum is still the best prospect, a bit dazed now, from the last debate, and when he appeared on Beck the effects were still visible. Campaigning is a tough business – and yes, Santorum needs to toughen up and learn how to block the verbal assaults and land the knock-out punch himself – time will tell – don’t give up on him yet though – he has a way of coming back from behind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Gee, how come you have no problem what so ever with Glenn Beck’s dishonesty, out of context quotes, hyperbole, etc. etc.?

    Double standards much?

    A lie, dillweed, is a purposeful misrepresentation; I don’t do that.

    Beck is a prove liar.  That’s a fact.
    Beck is a proven propagandist. That is a fact.
    Beck is an ignorant commentator. That is a fact.

    There is nothing misrepresented about that, even if you’re too stupid or biased or both to grasp these simple to understand facts.

  • Anonymous

    You lie all the time Vicky11…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Let me get this straight. First you rationalize calling Beck a “wretched individual,” which he is, as “sarcasm,” then you want me to prove you “said it.”  Are you really that stupid to not see that when you admit to being sarcastic when you wrote it, YOU WROTE IT!

    Once again, you prove how you are projecting your low IQ onto me when you issue your standard, pissed off 11 y/o insults.

    BTW; you are fundamentally dishonest with your rationalization to your fellow Beckerheads.   You were deceiving me throughout the attack you were waging in defense of Beck WHO LIED DURING HIS 8/28 SPEECH ON THE WASH. MALL!

    And as far as the claims that I have failed to demonstrate on three separate occasions that beck didn’t deceive his audience. In what way? What’s your evidence, proof? Making a claim is not proving it. I can sit here and make a claim that it’s raining outside, but it’s got to be raining outside for my claim to be true and I have to be able to demonstrate it. Your continuous demonstration of lackadaisical thinking and commitment to your cause makes you appear less sincere each and every time you respond. You would be better off not responding than to write the tripe you’ve offered so far as defense!
    I am working through them one by one. It takes less effort to accuse someone of guilt. All you have to do is make the assertion. But it takes a lot of effort to demonstrate innocence when the accusation is full of half truths and enthymeme. That’s why in a court of law the burden is one the prosecution to prove guilt, not the other way around. However, when there is a cacophony of circumstantial evidence offered that is mixed up with opinion and hearsay it takes a little more effort to parse it out, which is what I am practicing on you. It’s not required I be a Beck supporter to defend him. Just as it is not required I am a believer in the tooth fairy to defend the idea that people believe in the tooth fairy. You are just too lazy with your language and use of evidence to be making such broad claims and allow them to go unchallenged. I’m merely pointing these things out for the folks that will come along and read your blog. If you hadn’t figured it out yet, I am a law student. And this blog is rich with arguable points of evidence. This is merely an opportunity for me to stretch my legs a little outside the normal constraints of the classroom. And while you may find me a reprehensible creature for defending such a wretched individual such as Beck, I would come to your defense as well in the event someone accused you of anything that were less than attestable. I’m fair that way.

    I did prove guilt.  Beck lied when he claimed that he held Wash’s address in his hands. He lies every time he purposely misquotes Jefferson who never penned the phrase “honest questioning.” 

    You lied when you claimed to be “fair that way.”  You’re just a reactionary prick, a childish little boy who can’t stand to have his cult hero exposed for what he is.  THAT IS WHAT GETS YOUR PANTIES IN A BUNCH about me. Grow up and admit it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Still got that pissed off 11 y/o projection going, eh?  Will you never grow up, or do I have to keep pointing out that you act like an angry child?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Still got that pissed off 11 y/o projection going, eh?  Will you never grow up, or do I have to keep pointing out that you act like an angry child?
    I’d love to expose you to your classmates and join the laughter that would ensue when they find out that you’re a Beckerhead defending the lies and ignorance of America’s very own Joseph Goebbels, Glenn Beck.

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky11, you see, there you go lying again…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky11, you see, there you go lying again…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky11, you see, there you go lying again…

    You are dumb as a post…

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/B3YFPUPQHVLUGXEIRLTNTT2G4A Ramona

    Why is it that the first things to be councidered for cutting are the military,social security, and education? There are more things going on in Washington than just these three programs. Why cant we cut else where? Leave are elerly alone, we need to increase education, why dont we check the pay the administration of the school. They are making from 100,000. and up, but we want to cut education. Why dont we put a cap on insurances and what the medical profestion can charge rather than cut.

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t like his reponse on social security and also found him giving answers as if he were on a podium instead of Glenn’s cushy couch.   I’ve said it before, I will vote as a good citizen for the nominee-I wish it were over.   I can’t imagine the stress they all must be feeling.
    I also am starting to think if elected , it will be business as usual.   Hope I am wrong.
    God Bless Zerogone-I know your skin is thicker than most.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, like spending on vacations;  entertaining celebraties, partying while citizens cut back on theirs,  date nights,  green programs, subsidizing failing companies,  Pelocies week-end jaunts to SF;    when the economy is this bad,  should the president even smile, take the mike and sing Al Green when so many are hurting?
    Praise to the king!   

  • Anonymous

    LOL

  • Anonymous

    “old leather neck”…that’s me.

    One thing to remember RUFREE, things probably won’t change all that much – no matter who the nominee is, on the other hand, if a Republican doesn’t land the seat in the Oval Office, Obama will lead us to ruin, putting the finishing touches on the nightmare he’s already begun.

    But to think in such a divided political climate – unknown from any other – that future gridlock in both houses, won’t cause a stalemate in business as usual – we’d be kidding ourselves.

    On the other hand, if Republicans do win – at least our national security should be preserved, right now – to me that is – that must be the number one priority of any American President, no matter what party affiliation. Anything else is pouring good water after bad, in a broken cistern.

  • Anonymous

    Then Senator Obama:

    “As I’ve said about the flag

    pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides”. “There

    are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol

    of oppression..” “The anthem itself conveys a war-like

    message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of

    thing.”
    Obama continued: “The

    National Anthem should be ‘swapped’ for something less parochial and

    less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like To Teach the World To Sing’.

    If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we

    should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as ‘redesign’

    our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm

    America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren.

    If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the

    nations of Islam, where peace prevails – - – perhaps a state or period

    of mutual accord could exist between our governments ……”

    When I become President, I will seek

    a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war

    or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive

    thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed

    upon the nations of Islam, an

    unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past”.

    Meet The Press, Sept, 7, 2008
    Does this sound like someone that should be the POTUS, or better yet, re-elected to continue the destructon of our great nation?

  • Anonymous

    Scary!

  • Anonymous

    Rufree, this story appears to be a hoax. I cannot find any correlating video or audio that proves SBO actually said any of this.

    With that being said, even if he did say it, but no one can produce any kind of evidence that he did, you’ll need to retract this because it simply makes you and anyone else who propagates it look like a lunatic.

    I appreciate what you’re trying to do, but you have to do it correctly. This is not the way to go about it…

  • Anonymous

    Of course you wouldn’t find it-it along with many other qotes have been removed!   I stand by what I have posted because I heard it with my own ears! 
    Is it something we would not expect coming out of his mouth in view of what he’s done so far? Was he not seen not putting his hand on his heart when the National Anthum was recited?

  • Bill Tilghman

    A lie, dillweed, is a purposeful misrepresentation; You only do that, there is no particle of truth in you, LIAR.

    You are a liar, a coward, and absolutely insane with your dogged pursuit of Glenn Beck. Only an out of control crazy does the things you do.

    You’re too stupid and biased to grasp any simple to understand fact, and you have no hope of changing that.

    You are certifiably crazy, Victor, and it is as plain as the chrome finish on your head.

  • Bill Tilghman

    You have never proven anything, dolt. Your madness seeps out of every one of your posts and only you are blind to it.

    More about panties from you? What are you, some kind of kinky pedophile or worse? You need to face the truth that no one here likes you or what you have to say, especially when you are so wrong that everyone can see it plainly.

    You are the king of projecting and rationalization, but you think that your words persuade and provide a cogent argument for your skewed opinions. It is clear you are quite insane. You can’t defend any of what you espouse but that continuous stream of raw sewage that issues from you is what you think is revelatory proof. It is not and only serves to make you look more of a jackass every day.

    You don’t have the authority to tell anyone what to do, so why don’t you just admit defeat and retreat like the yellow stain coward that you are?

    My guess is you are too stupid to do it.

  • Bill Tilghman

    Tiffany, the only 11 year old girly here is you.

    You point out nothing because you have nothing to point with.

  • Bill Tilghman

    You’d love to expose yourself? Please don’t bother – we have all seen enough of your ass already.

  • Anonymous

    The point is, you need to be able to prove it if you are going to present it to the public at large. I stand by my assertion, that you mitigate your credibility if you can’t prove it…

    I don’t like him anymore than you do. But your position looks weak if you can’t provide something to prove it. This isn’t a court of law where eye-witness testimony counts for anything.

    If you’re going to try and make a case it needs to be sound, and watertight.

    The idea that he failed to put his hand over his heart isn’t enough to show anything other than he failed to put his hand over his heart. It is arguable that he simply forgot or he was daydreaming, or he was thinking about his campaign and didn’t realize his error. And even if you were able to prove it was intentional, what’s the penalty? If there’s a law, but no penalty for breaking it, is it really a law?

    All I am saying is make a case on something substantial, this kind of stuff doesn’t have any punch behind it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bishimine Barry DaKama’aina InKali

    Would like 2 C da adda 2 videos but its blank….. (translation: you have technical problems with the other two videos and would appreciate it if you would fix the problem in order for myself and others to enjoy viewing the video clips on this webpage)

  • Anonymous

    This country was built on the backs of immigrants. Many point the finger at hispanic and latino immigrants  whose ancestors roamed the Americas freely before Spaniards and Europeans came in. It’s not an “illegals” fault that the economy is the way it is. Stop the racism and discrimination.

  • Anonymous

    Dreams From My Father:
    “I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.”

    “There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white.”

    “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”

    “I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa , that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.”
    And FINALLY ………… and most scary:

    From Audacity of Hope:”I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
    Someone with this mentality running our GREAT nation! Keep your eye on him and don’t blink.”I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

    Someone with this mentality running our GREAT nation! Keep your eye on him and don’t blink.
    Is this better?  I have read both books.

  • Anonymous

    That’s great, and the warning is prominent. But it doesn’t prove the other statement…

    You aren’t listening to what I am saying. If you can prove it use it. If you can’t, don’t.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you GB.

  • Anonymous

    Where did you say you heard it? It was familiar.

  • Anonymous

    What does that have to do with anything? My ancestors owned property at one point in time, should that give me the right to go back onto it illegally any time I want?
    You are crying over the past. The past is over, we are living in the here and now and for the future. The longer you refuse to accept that, the more miserable your life will be.

    Come here legally with the belief in our founding principles and anybody is more than welcome here. It is not our fault they chose to come here ILLEGALLY! They knowingly broke our laws so stop excusing law breakers or we will be a 3rd world country also. Or is that what you really want?

    The USA cannot provide jobs for all of the countries south of our border. These illegal immigrants better start to realize this and start fighting to change their own countries to a free modern economy instead of a corrupt third world country. Do this and you will have no better friend than the USA. If they don’t take care of their own problems and keep making them ours, the US is going to have to do something about it and I seriously doubt you will like the outcome of that. Just look at the Muslims, they refused to take care of their radical problem so we are having to. Think about it.

  • Anonymous

    Meet the Press, Sept 7, 2008.  Senator at the time.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve been watching John Stossel-he really exposes what’s going on in our government.   Todays show exemplifies the extent of the abuses.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t doubt you one bit…

  • Anonymous

    Another thought-  What do we tell our grandchildren when they ask us why we let this happen?    We can no longer remain silent-we can’t let happen to our country that happened to Germany.   We certainly can’t show our politicians we are/will be complacent with what ever they serve us.   They need to know who works for whom!

  • Anonymous

    Our God, not his,  will take care of that.   Obama better take American Idol up on their offer;  you know, job security.    Which is more than I can say about the averge American without work, due to his lack of leadership.  You keep drinking that koolaide spiked with rum.

  • Anonymous

    European Parliament Member Daniel Hannan Urges America To Turn Back From Following EU’s Disastrous Path
    This is what happens when we elect a man lacking honor; he surrounds himself with those whom he can count on to vocalize his lies and treasonous policies. Our Founders wrote the Constitution for this very reason; somehow they knew there would be a Barack Obama in our future. Folks, and here we are, paying the price for our negligence; heed the words from Daniel Hannan, speaker and member of Parliament, at CPAC. Wake your friends and family members, resting in their stubbornness to listen, because it is imperative for the health of our great nation and the future of our children! This, I am certain many of you have seen as Mr. Hannan’s speech is recent.    Our vigiligence is essential for the survival of our Republic;   we need to continue efforts in exposing this administration for what they are.

  • Anonymous

    Would you forget to stand on hearing the Pledge Of Allegience, or not face the flag, or put hand on heart?   If you have to think about doing it, it really isn’t important enough to remember.
    Somehow, like me, you would automatically do it without too much thought, yes?

  • Anonymous

    I agree completely… However, I am just pointing out what the defense would argue to establish doubt.

  • Anonymous

    DOA?

  • Sandie

    “A lie, dillweed, is a purposeful misrepresentation; I don’t do that.” … Oh but yes you do and the proof is in the archives of your posts. This is a blatant lie which you have presented purposefully.

    You, Victor Tiffany are a proven liar. That’s a fact.
    You, Victor Tiffany are a proven propagandist. That is a fact.
    You, Victor Tiffany are an ignorant commentator. That is a fact.

    There is nothing misrepresented about that, even if you’re too stupid or biased or both to grasp these simple to understand facts.

  • Sandie

    You proved nothing except that you have no clue what sarcasm is, just as you have proven in the past that you lack the ability to discern when someone says something figuratively and you take it literally.

    You are still too stupid to understand theatrics and dramatization for effect in presentation by an entertainment figure in order to connect with his audience. That you would put soooo much emphasis on such an unimportant, irrelevent incident, blowing it way out of proportion in order to dishonestly use it to promote some obsessive almost psychotic agenda you have is evidence of your mental illness. Get help Vic. You are a mess.

  • Sandie

    Yup, he is a card carrying lunatic!

  • Sandie

    Oh yes, he is almost as obsessed with other peoples panties as he is with Beck!

  • Anonymous

    I find it interesting how Glenn Beck takes quotes out of context when he provides FULL, UNEDITED video footage of those exact quotes.  News flash.  It is flat out IMPOSSIBLE to take quotes out of context when those quotes are provided in their ENTIRETY.  Of course, we sane people on the right expect nothing but total dishonesty from you liberal hypocrites.  You just proved your own lying, propagandist, ignorant self yet again, Vicky, with your post here.  Good job, hypocrite.

  • Anonymous

    no stepped away.  couldn’t find it either, even though it did sound familiar.  must of heard it somewhere else, because i never watch meet the press. 

  • Anonymous

    Rick Santorum on faith and the public square: Consistent with his past for using hyperbole when there is nothing to be gained (either in forms of personal credibility or political elctability), yesterday, Rick Santorum reminded everyone how he wanted to “throw up” when he read John F. Kennedy’s speech to Baptist ministers during the heat of the 1960 Presidential campaign. Santorum’s act of wretching was aparently due to Kennedy’s statement that the “separation of church and state is absolute”.  I have no doubt that Rick Santorum read and re-read Kennedy’s speech before he himself offered his judgment  on it. But a little context here, and I wonder what is so offensive about this speech. I have highlighte dthe phrase which immediatley follows Kennedy’s “throw up” clause.

    “I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute,
    WHERE NO CATHOLIC PRELATE WOULD TELL THE PRESIDENT (SHOULD HE BE CATHOLIC) HOW TO ACT, AND NO PROTESTANT MINISTER WOULD TELL HIS PARISHIONERS FOR WHOM TO VOTE; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference; and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the president who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.

    I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials; and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.”

    For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew— or a Quaker or a Unitarian or a Baptist. It was Virginia’s harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson’s statute of religious freedom. Today I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you — until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril.

    Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end; where all men and all churches are treated as equal; where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice; where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind; and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.”

    So, Kennedy was addressing the notion that no one faith should be given preference over another. Santorum seizes on one phrase, inverts history (and in other comments) blames Kennedy for the so called loss of Christianity in the public square.  In fact, I find Kennedy’s speech to be consistent with a recent statement issued by evangleicals and catholic theologians regarding the Obama administration’s wrongful attempt to coerce Catholic hospitals to offer abortion and contraception services. I suspect that Rick Santorum would fully endorse this view as well.
    http://www.firstthings.com/article/2012/02/in-defense-of-religious-freedom

    Rick Santorum’s statements are fodder for the headline driven press which will add it to the pile of bricks he has laid to show he is interested in Catholic Church theology and influence in the government. I do not understnad who Rick Santorum thinks he is scoring points with when he uses  out of context hyperbole. Zero gain with this position–much pain to come with it.

  • Anonymous

    What a disappointment listening to the weak replies Santorum provided to Glenn in his interview.
    I cannot see how he could ever go in combat with Obama as he comes across with no real concisive, and  emotionally strong feelings against Obama and his mob.  He still sounds awkward and unprofessional refusing to mention topics regarding Obama that should be brought up, topics that only Newt mentions.
    So far, it appears Newt would be the only one who can express himself more authoratively, concisely, intelligently and fervently than any of the others.
    I don’t think Rick Santorum has   the  strength of his convictions  or the ability to stand up like a warrior in defending the ideals of the American Constitution or the extent of the  corruption in the present gov’t.  especially  regarding it’s president.

  • Anonymous

    Conservatism does not mean doubling the size of the federal government in order to be a “team player” as Rick Santorum cast his votes to spend taxpayer monies while he was in Congress.

    Conservatism does not mean selling out the US Constituion, any of it.

    Ronald Reagan understood that at the heart of Conservatism was classical liberalism (Constitutional Conservatism). Sadly, this is something that Santorum, Romney, Gingrich and Obama fail to understand as well as their supporters.

    Defend and uphold our foundation of liberty, the US Constituton, without wavering and the rest of Conservatism falls into place. Abandon the individual liberties affirmed by our Constitution and granted by our creator and abandon Conservatism altogether.

    Rick Santorum is a Progressive RINO wrapped in an evangelical frock.Same big government guy as Obama-Romney (including gun control) but with a different garnish. Nothing to look at here folks…..

  • Bill Tilghman

     Please do hold your breath. We could all use a break from that foul stench you emit.

  • Bill Tilghman

     Your entire comment is a lie, what do you mean you don’t do purposeful misrepresentation? That is all you ever do here and elsewhere on the net. Anyone who cares to can see your lies 24x7x365 by checking your comments on DISQUS. That means you can no longer hide what you are.

    Truth and fact have never been a part of your repertoire.

  • Bill Tilghman

     We think you are a wretched liar and that is enough for most of us. As far as your cries of racist go, have you ever heard the story of the little boy who cried wolf?

    That is what you are, Mister Wretched Liar.

  • Bill Tilghman

     Perhaps that decap part of his name refers to the apparent lack of anything above the neck, evidenced by his comments.

  • Bill Tilghman

     Benny, in reference to your comment above, “Nuhuhn, he’s Beck’s most critical critic who critiques Becks’ critical critiques…”; how long before he reaches critical (jack)ass? He has to be damned close now.

  • Bill Tilghman

    You talk smack about how others are cowards, yet you displayed your yellow stripe on two occasions when a person offered to meet you man to man and settle the matter of who the coward is. Do I need to get the person you threatened to repost your threats, and the offers to discuss face to face all the lies and falsehoods you have been hawking here for two years now?

    Don’t make us all laugh with your false bravado. You have no business calling anyone a coward – ever. You were given two chances to man up and you ran away. Now you scream foul when your frustration is beyond your tolerance level.

    Why is is such a coward like you avoids dealing with me on a regular basis but you will focus your attentions on other people and make all sorts of outrageous accusations against them? So far the best you have come up with to oppose me were little more than elementary school attempts at taking a poke at me?

    I think you are afraid to take me on, just like you were afraid to show up when a reckoning was offered to you by another poster several months ago.

    You are the weakest coward!

  • Bill Tilghman

     Well finally a subject you have personal experience with – never getting close to having any real power. You ran for office once and were roundly defeated by the voters of Ithaca. They had the wisdom to avoid letting you occupy any political office, because they could see you are crazy.

    Benny is correct, you are a retard.

  • Anonymous

    He’s such a coward he hides out in older threads, or harasses perceived weaker posters, surrounding them with false accusations.

    How this lowbrow Vicki11 is allowed to remain after the last time, is beyond me.

    He is dumb as a post, that’s for sure, Bill Tilghman.
    BTW. The history of this namesake is a treasure. :-)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    9 Santorum Speeches That Make Me Want to Throw Up: The thought of living under a neo-theocracy makes me kind of queasy.

    http://www.alternet.org/story/154319/9_santorum_speeches_that_make_me_want_to_throw_up/ 

    Want theocracy in America?  Then Glenn Beck’s man, Rick Santorum, is your guy.

  • Bill Tilghman

    Theocracy is strictly prohibited under the First Amendment to The Constitution of the United States of America – I told you this a few days ago. You persist in this ridiculous assertion, which reflects a lower than average intellect and an unwillingness to recognize facts presented to you in black and white. Either you are mentally deficient or just plain stupid.

    You coming here and posting links to Alternet junk shows that I am correct in my assessment. So far you have met Benjamin Franklin’s criteria for the definition of insanity on many occasions. You keep repeating the same old junk and expect the results to go in your favor.

    Here’s a hint – it isn’t going to happen, Captain Underpants.

  • Bill Tilghman

    Why thank you, dear lady!

  • Bill Tilghman

     There is nothing racist in expecting you to obey the law of this nation in regard to immigration so stop making an emotional mountain out of a molehill. If you had done your homework you would know that the border states have a huge burden to deal with in supporting illegals who don’t pay taxes in proportion to the government services they consume, and who work off the books so the payroll taxes their employment generates does not get paid by citizens here who are willing to break the law.

    You could not be more wrong. It is not racism at work here, it is people tired of supporting illegal immigrants who come here and violate immigration laws merely by being here. No racism is being displayed by the rightful citizens who are legally in this country, however the case could be made that the illegals are racist for continuing to break the law and conspiring to take over territory by becoming squatters on US soil and private property.

  • Bill Tilghman

     Congratulations Shameer – you got liked by Victor Tiffany, the biggest damn fool who comes here, that is quite an accomplishment!

    No one is saying your opinion stinks, but you are already attracting flies with it.

  • Sandie

    The way he just keeps popping off idiotic comments like that without thinking is dumb founding.

  • Bill Tilghman

    Yes, he continues to prove he is clueless and senseless. He hasn’t got the presence of mind to recognize what a failure he is.

  • Anonymous

    I think you missed it. As far as I can tell it was immediately after I first encountered him…

    But, keep watching, I expect he’s capable of reaching critical multiple times.

  • Anonymous

    Your welcome, it’s apropos….IMHO. :-D

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky11, virtually every comment you post makes me queasy.

    You are as dumb as a post…

  • Bill Tilghman

    I feel certain that your words will prove prophetic.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Coming from the queen of stupidity, that’s so ironic my computer LOL!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Coming from a little boy pretending to be a “marshal,” that’s rich with  irony.

    Beck is off Fox now.  Who’s the failure here?

    Beck is losing his vision. He’s walking with a cane.  Even his health is failing him.  

    Got any more complete misunderstandings of reality to convey? You Beckerheads are the royalty of the Know Nothing Party.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Tiffany/100001320367593 Victor Tiffany

    Let’s see, you act like a pissed off 11 y/o, and I make you “queasy.”  

    You are defending America’s 21st Century Joseph Goebbels, and I make you “queasy.”  Uh huh.

    You’re completely stuck on stupid with you mindless, personal attacks, and I make you “queasy.”  You’re one pathetically stupid, reactionary, brown-shirted prick. You make me sick! 

    Apparently, theocracy in America is fine with you. (I doubt that given your Satanic nature, but you’d rather attack a defender of liberty than a reactionary like Santorum. Your hatred blinds you to the real threat to your liberty.  You’re a pathetic, bad joke.

  • Bill Tilghman

    Moronica, Moronica, what is to be done with you? The failure here is all yours. Glenn Beck isn’t the subject here despite your many weak attempts to derail the conversation and substitute your insane agenda.

    Are you claiming responsibility for his failing health, or are you simply rejoicing in another man’s misfortune? Your day will come chromer, be patient, you’re pushing sixty now and I’ll wager you have more frailty than you are willing to admit here. Your mind is obviously failing you, and as far as having a soul goes you lost that long ago when you turned to the prog side.

    I call you like I see you, and that is Queen of the Damned Stupid and Empress of the Imbecilic.

    You don’t even admit you are a progressive liberal and you hide behind some fictitious Lincolnian Republican title. Admit your true nature – you are a left wing nut job. Come on, we all know it, admit it to yourself. Come out of that closet, there is a whole big world out here.

  • SoThere

    Flagged.

    The Nurse at the sanatorium is going to restrict your computer time.

  • Sandie

    that sentence you blurted, obviously without thinking again, makes no sense….just keep chattering away. You should really stop speaking in tongues.

  • Anonymous

    You are lying again Vicky with an IQ of 2…

  • Sandie

    Beck losing his vision and walking with a cane has nothing to do with anything. More off the wall outta nowhere twaddle from Victor.

  • Anonymous

    Oh Vicky with an IQ of 2, how do you remain so stupid?

    You make posts look smart…

  • Anonymous

    Vicky with an IQ of 2, are you an example of an advanced education?

    Do you EVER proof read what you write?

    Post pity you for your immense ignorance…

  • Anonymous

    Since Medicare and Medicaid are not entitlements–they were deducted from each and every paycheck we received, and backed by our employers also.  How can Santorum, Obama, or anyone else call these entitlements?  I know that congress changed the title to entitlements, but they are NOT!!  If congress would keep their fingers out of our money, check on corrupt doctors and hospitals who over charge patient accounts, and put more stringent checks and balances on welfare, we wouldn’t be in this situation.
    I agree that we need to put them in a free marketplace.  Give me my money and let me handle it–not government, not AARP, not wall street.  They’re all corrupt!