Project SOS, remember Soros statement in regards to the Secretaries of States who deal with the final certification of the votes…”You do not need to control the voters; you only need to control those who certify the votes.”

Soros will stop at nothing for the collapse of the United States; and he is making sure to have the deck stacked in his favor as much as possible. I have to wonder if even back in 2000, with the chaos of the Gore/Bush election, Soros was trying to manipulate events back then and had a royal monkey wrench thrown into his plans until Obama came onboard.

Glad these two reporters have the guts and integrity to make a stand against Soros; and may more find such courage and take him on, until all know the true Godfather of the left.

I heard he has a barcode on the left cheek of his butt that say use by November 06,2012.  He also has on his right butt cheek 999 or you could turn it upside down.

 Goerge Soros fulfills the role that the President of a company does. He runs the show, but there are a multitude of people pulling his strings. The shareholders. The board. The CEO(s). He didn’t accumulate all of his money all on his lonesome. Other billionaires didn’t just decide overnight that Soros was a swell guy and knew what was up in the world in the ’80s and start letting him funnel their money into “charities” without knowing full well what the guy was doing. Soros wasn’t anywhere near the richest guy in the world and yet he was involved with manipulating entire currencies and influencing international policy?

Soros represents a circle of influence in the world. What do they all agree on? Well, what does Soros promote? Look at the list of what Soros pushes and you have the list of what the financial support behind Soros wants. Global secularization. Global currency. Global governance. Global population control.

Soros is as much of a symbol for the people he represents as the American flag is a symbol for our nation. If Soros wasn’t doing this, someone else would be.

So what to do to fight back? You know that whole “separation of church and state” thing the left keeps using to push forced secularization? Yeah, well, our Constitution is legitimately a foundation for the separation of economy and government. Achieve that separation and Soros’ role is nullified.

So well put and so very consise.

The Koch brothers are the number one helpers of the Right and as such are hated the most by the Left by default.  George Soros on the other hand has never helped anybody but himself yet a lot of people are latching onto him and benefiting from his association.  I talk to the progressive leeches who hold him closest…isn’t he a capitalist, and isn’t his market the whole world’s welfare and aren’t you benefiting from him with a capitalistic approach?  The George Soros ilk and anything attached to it is a corporation, just like Bain Capital for instance.  They come, they take something over, and they devastate it…except…Bain Capital benefited what it touched 78% of the time, while Soros benefits 0% of what he touches in the long run.  When the flawed economic practices of a New World Order or any communist/socialist dictatorship are exposed in an altruistic way, aren’t they in essence the REAL epitome of capitalism gone bad?  Think about it.

In my opinion, Soros is far more than filling the roll of a company President.  Soros makes Kings, Presidents, Dictators, and the economy of entire nations.  And, he can destroy them as fast as he made them if they do not perform to his personal specifications.  He truly is one of the most dangerous people in the world.

this guy owns obama & the demoCRAP party, if we don’t expose him this country will be a socialist nation…stand & do your part to defeat these anti-Americans…

Bottom line about Soros, he is an evil, vile and manipulative man.  Never to be trusted and represents the lowest forms of human life.  His Followers are dumber than dumb and allow their inflated egos to halt their pea brains of intelligence.  Now I hear Soros is Actually A PUPPET of the Rothchilds.  Anyone have info on That?

 lol! 0% benifits…WHAT???our future is our benefit…u think about it!!!

The future where I’m jailed for being a Christian because I live in a bullshit socialistic society? Nahhh, not to my benefit.

As I said before, that is information you have to “find.” Look at Soros’ life, he worked for the Rothschilds.

Of course Soros backs these left wing idiots, that’s how he has made his money. He backs policies he knows will collapse a country, then bets against it. The Rothschilds taught him well.

I do not think you understand how Soros, the Rothschilds, Morgans or Rockefellers operate. Soros donates money to causes he knows will collapse the system, then bets AGAINST it and makes a ton of money. He isn’t giving money to these organizations out of the kindness in his heart. He gets people to vote against their best interest so he can make money on it. The Rothschilds, Morgans, Rockefellers and their ilk play it a bit different. They like to be behind the central banks of countries, which means they make money no matter what.

 “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” —
Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

I’m not sure that I said anything that you’re opposed to here but thank you for the reply. My alliteration here is that Soros IS what the Left THINKS Romney and the Koch brothers are. Your definite misunderstanding of me is hereby forgiven.

Not really, Soros is but a puppet of the true dangerous people. The Rothschilds, Morgans, Rockefellers and their ilk. The amount of money Soros has is chump change compared to the Rothschilds.

I do not care if you forgive me or not. You are sounding like a left wing idiot, stop with the B S left wing superiority complex. You do not seem to understand my comment. Soros is a lightning rod for people such as the Rothschilds. The Koch brothers are a lightning rod for NO ONE. that is a HUGE difference.

OK, so who are those people behind Soros? I’ll tell you who, they are the Rothschilds, Morgans, Rockefellers and their ilk. You are right, Soros is the “lightning rod.”

DUDE IM NOT A COMMIE! I was bashing Soros! How don’t you see it??! Reread my comment! I love capitalism! I love Israel! I vote republican! You simply don’t quite understand my posts! Reread them I agree with you!

That’s correct. Soros is merely a functionary for cabalistic elitists who have polluted virtually all aspects of western Christian culture for millennia. Unfortunately, by focusing on individuals like Soros while ignoring their true historical roots, Beck and others (especially Judeo-Christians) miss the bigger picture and actually enable more of the same. It’s a shame.

I’m saying, is what Soros does, it’s evil, but the things that he ACTUALLY does, are what the Leftists are saying the Romney and Koch camps have done. Let me be clear to you…Soros sucks, all commies suck, capitalism is awesome DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND ME YET???

And Romney and the Koch brothers are not evil, they’re just businessmen, they aren’t scum like Soros.

I was not opposed to anything you said, in the first place. I was simply trying to give you a bit more information or expand upon your original statement. I understood completely, you did not seem to understand mine. Your last comment about forgiving me is quite condescending, it sounds a lot like the left wing idiots.

As I stated before, I was simply EXPANDING on your comment, not denoucing it in any way. So, go take a chill pill.

I was not condescending you, you told me I didn’t understand what Soros does. Newsflash, I do. I was angry that you said I did not understand something that I in fact understood and I expressed my anger towards you. I am not anything leftist, and I’m not anything approaching idiot.

“Your definite misunderstanding of me is hereby forgiven.” If you think statement is not condescending, you should learn what the word means. In your first post, you did not say anything close to my response, so how can you say you said the EXACT same thing? No mention of Bilderbergs, Rothschilds, Morgans or Rockefellers and you said the same thing? Oh, nevermind.

Yeah, it is, but the only way to change it is to inform people.

Roger that. But how their ears have been tickled. Much work to do.

Is George running a laundry for recreational substance manufacturers and suppliers. Interesting that when he distributed the “public” portion of his hedge funds, that less than 4% was distributed. if he was making money legally in any market on the scale indicated -he would be  rock star instead of a wealthy Quisling  with insider trading connections. Just seems that it’s so easy to give money away when you know it’s always going to be replenished. So either he’s a savant, an inside trader or a drug laundry. In all three cases, risk is mitigated because he wither knows the future (cases 1 and 2) or he is paid handsomely with off-shore dollars because no one else has the connections to put starch in the dollar.

I hope nobody saw this. Yours and my posts that is. Maybe it was my six pack talking. I just voted for Walker and I hope he wins (hence the reason for the six pack, the HOPE he wins). Can we just say at this point that this was a good figurative bar fight and move on with our lives?

 It’s a rabbit hole of dry financial/legal/historical information. It may bore you to tears, unless you see the ramifications and associated outcomes behind the facts

To get started, if you look up each country and group that has brought serious legal charges against Soros, you’ll find that there are others that shift their finances in coordination with Soros. Soros’ early history is widely known fact in Britain, attached to shady bankers who backed and used Soros like a financial hit man. If you look up Soros’ charity donors, you’ll find the people who work with Soros. Well, the agents – not the actual people behind the agents. Look up the founding of the Federal Reserve for well-known easy-to-find info. on agents.

To keep this from sounding like a conspiracy theory and to get you looking into it for yourself, let me explain it like this: 1st off, hopefully you’re aware that there are terms such as “new money” and “old money” and what they represent. Well, old money Europeans and Mediterranean civs generally stem from two groups (unlike East Asia where they are almost always from the “noble” class). Group A is the noble class, which a rudimentary education on the feudal system will explain. Basically, inherited money and power, and the only way you become part of that class is by being born into it or by marrying into it. Group B is the merchant class. Group A and Group B have generally been against each other for over two thousand years, increasingly so to this day.

You don’t see the incomes or the wealth calculation of old money in Forbes. Forbes shows us the general income levels of those who are willing to share it with the rest of us and those that can’t afford or don’t know the right people to hide their income and accumulated capital properly, or give generalized info about their income as a calculated move. So, just in case you didn’t know, in plain English – Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Larry Ellison, Charles Koch, David Koch, Christy Walton, and George Soros are not the richest Americans. They all represent relatively “new money”… minus Gates, who simply elevated the Gates family from quite wealthy to very, very, very wealthy.

In other words, while Forbes gives us a peak into the power-money world in America, it does not pull aside the curtain. And it gives us even less of a glimpse of the rest of the world. If you stick around until later in the week I’ll have more time and I’ll put some links here for you to look up, a book list, and a magazine list. I have plenty of information but I don’t have the time to dig it all up and type it out right here and now. But feel free to do your own research until then. It’s not as hard to look up as you might think as long as you know what you’re looking for and how to filter out the numerous piles of bullcrap floating around out there. And list anything you find of interest. I’m always finding new info myself, so there’s a decent chance you’ll find something of interest for everyone.

P.s. I started investigating what I call “shadow wealth” (Someone else might use the term. I don’t know. I’ve never come across it anywhere else. I just made it up for myself because it seemed appropriate.) when I was a teenager and I came across what I saw as blatant discrepancies in published income and spending reports from our government. Since then I’ve gone ever further down the rabbit’s hole following family histories and government histories, verifying my information each step of the way. I discovered that the history of the world is largely made up of wealthy/powerful men greedy for more wealth/power exploiting divisiveness in populations to insulate and elevate themselves and their families. And what is “conspiracy” in the U.S. regarding this history is widely known history in much of Europe. Since our own history is made up of Americans repeatedly rejecting those ways as a system, we’ve largely ignored it – to our own detriment, as we can now see.

 The problem with that website you listed greywolfrs is that it mixes fact with a slant aimed at creating anti-Jewish sentiment. It’s completely ignoring that many of the people it claims are “Jews” are in fact self-proclaimed non-religious people. Some are openly atheist, while others are agnostic, while others simply call themselves non-religious. Soros himself says that he is anti-religious. He believes religion is inherently destructive. Obviously the man is not a Jew. Being born from Jewish ancestry does not make one a religious Jew anymore than being born from Christian ancestry makes one a Christian. Not exactly the best source.

 Yep. I wish people would just use common sense. Read the famous stories of Soros. He invested other people’s money to do the things he has done. His “charity” system isn’t exclusively his money. In fact, it’s only partially his money. And when Soros depletes his funds creating mischief, where do people think he gets more money from to keep going? And he’s not the only one of his kind. He’s just a famous one because people like Beck are willing to call him out.

I believe I looked down the same Rabbit hole that you did.  It has alerted me to the worst nightmare and it all falls into place. Quantum Fund,Richard Katz, Rothchilds, Rockefellers,Morgans to name a few,  Illuminati.  Super Power and Slaves.  Where is our Media?  Why is this NOT being Reported/ The Media merely feed Pablum to the Masses and the proof is what we as Individuals research independently. As I researched Soros and his connections and saw that He is Their Puppet,  so much fell into place and the writing is on the wall.
Time for the Media to step up to the plate and STOP being Afraid to Report the FACTS.  Soros and his Puppeteers are a Hot Topic.  and the Liberals have the nerve to call the Koch bros. big spenders.  

 I don’t adhere to “Illuminati” theories. The reason the “Illuminati” theories don’t fly with me is because there are so many different factions around the world that fight with each other and dynasties have waxed and waned over the years. People are afraid of what they don’t understand, and secret societies among the elite largely exploit this fact. But they experience the same fears. They’ve never been unified. There has never been one single overwhelmingly powerful group of individuals. Simply put, factual history refutes any notion of a continuously powerful and influential Illuminati.

As much as Soros and friends would like to rule the world, there are still enough people existing on this planet with enough power and wealth to counter them that they haven’t been successful yet. What’s new and frightening is the new trend toward globalization and the seeming “conversion” of otherwise relatively sensible billionaires like Pickens. The unifying element that is bringing them together is population control, whether they’re simply stone cold eugenicists or Malthusian overpopulation theorists. Another unifying element is secularism. Absolute morality comes from religion, and it impedes their agenda of population control. If people aren’t willing to change their moral compass to fit the desires of the elite, the elite are deciding that they’re just going to go ahead with the program anyway. More and more of them have been setting aside their differences to tackle these issues together.

Yet there are still factions within their ranks. Some of them don’t like the extremes that the dialogue is shifting to (which is causing some to jump ship right now). Obviously the vast majority of the population of the planet doesn’t want to be subjected to population control standards. And the propaganda to promote the motives to get people to accept such things has been failing (climate change, mandated vaccinations, legal limits on births, birth control drugs introduced into the water, etc. etc. etc…). One other thing these self-styled elites have in common is a fear of uprising against them, because they are by design the tiniest group in society, which with all its benefits also puts them at the disadvantage when the population gets restless about their systems of control.

What seems amazing to me is how blind the vast majority of the population is to their methods. For crying out loud, the Nazis called their justification for racial purges “Racial Hygiene” long before they actually did it as a selling point of their political party. We have people like Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, George Soros, and Ted Turner and an entire political party in the U.S. (Democrats) actively promoting “Reproductive Hygiene” by both word and with finances. And their programs are all aimed at distributing conception prevention (contraceptives), researching sterilization techniques, making abortion legal and “free”, and promoting mandatory vaccination. FOLKS! ARE YOU READING THIS? THEY’RE NOT HIDING IT!

Any man who admits to enjoying the destruction of his fellow man needs an identification number of “666″.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1Qr7TnWG74&feature=related

 Why misspell “Democrat”  Just put the emphasis on the last three letters.

 Your point about being born of Jewish ancestry not making a person religious is a very good point indeed.  However, just because one is not religious is no excuse for turning on his fellow man and enjoying their destruction.  Whether or not that makes him atheistic is no excuse for making him evil.  Not all atheists are evil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1Qr7TnWG74&feature=related

Soros did more to end communism in Europe than all the vapid Republicans in the US put together including Ronnie Ray-Gun. I think it is both revealing and pathetic that this ass clown Beck dare state and I quote: “Every one of the Ivy League colleges and universities received funding
from Soros. More than $15 million was granted since 2000 to promote
specific programs that line up with the Soros ideology”. Don’t ya think that a propagandist of quality would at least name a few of those “specific programs”?  “Communism for fun and profit” maybe or “How to use your Ivy League education to stifle out from under a rock hair bags like Glen Beck”? You have to have a very low IQ to buy into Beck’s bullsh*t so the folks that believe this nonsense do not have to worry about attending any of Soros’s tainted leftist classes. They would not get in.

 “Christian culture”? LMAO I will let the delicious oxymoronic irony of that comment speak for itself. By the way, the earth is round.

The damage caused by progressives has been immense, and probably fatal to the classic liberal principles of individual liberty that took six thousand years to finally mature in the American Republic. But the regressive tragedy of modern progressivism doesn’t alter value or truth of those fundamental principles which were based largely on Christian culture and the preceding cultures that led to it. You can LYAO all you want, but the joke is on you, one of the growing number of newly indoctrinated who ignorantly spout such drivel (“oxymoronic irony”) and who will never really know what they have sacrificed as we regress under the misnomer of progressivism.

Apparently, your hatred of Beck exceeds your understanding of Soros. Your elitist slip is showing. If you could get it under control, you might start to lean something. 

 i am impressed to say that since Glenn is doing God’s work by Glenn’s back to a large degree. shining the light on this creep, God must have his back at least to a large degree…also, by listening, taking heed and acting, we in turn have Glenn’s back..we gotta keep up the fight for America that is being facilitated by the work Glenn does. Let’s Roll, Folks!

I am on board.  George Soros is a slimy, creepy crawling man.  I believe he was the slimy snake in the garden of Eden.  I think we should put all of them away.  We need to get our country back.  I am ready for a good fight!!! 

Well it was Glenn who brought this dude out in the open,msm don’t have a clue. soros is a man to keep your eyes on at all times.

I agree.  I have been called by God to become an evangelist an I am answering that call.  But I have much preparation as well, so that my spiritual armor may be strong.

Lots of good info here. I personally think Obama care is a form of population control. What better way to convince people to go along with their own demise than to hide genocide under the guise of helping the poor.

Am at a loss for words after reading your comment. I agree with you re: Illuminati theories. Yet reading about that was something to think about. Your view of Soros and the others wanting to rule the world is most accurate and I agree with you that they indeed, are a small group and will not succeed. The Democrats and their ways are NOT being reported by the biased media. Sterilization and other contraceptive means are on their agenda and at the taxpayers expense. It will Never happen. This is where common sense and intelligent Americans will step up to the plate and say NO. Thank you for your reply to my comment and I look forward to reading more of your comments.

Message to Glenn…Soro’s is ONE OF THEM, and you know this. The Soro’s chalk board tree includes other Bilderberg names like Kissenger, Rothchilds, Rockefellers, etc.
 Why weren’t YOU there reporting on Bilderberg? Instead you find something to mock Alex Jones about because he had the courage to go there and report on it. Guess you picked your side, as your true colors are showing.

No doubt about that.

Sure, but I wasn’t really trying to fight. I was simply trying to add to your comment, not taking anything away from your post. Be cool.

I was not exactly speaking to the religious nature, but more trying to show the connection between the Rothschilds and Soros. That site may have the slant you speak of, but the connections can be verified by other sites.

You are absolutely correct, but I think Soros likes being the “lightning rod.”

I understand. I don’t deny the Rothschilds connections. Yet, there is another issue that I hope people consider… I often feel compelled to preface statements with it because generalizing can be harmful. What I’m talking about is that when you or I say ‘the Rogthschilds are associated with this guy or this movement’, not every single member of the Rothschilds family are to be included in the umbrella statement. Not every Rothschild family member is a member of their united core group that is the machine of amoral ambition. The same with the Rockefellers and other dynastic “old money” type families. Some are more united than others, but being born to a last name no more predetermines your views on the world than it does your Salvation. Every human is born with free will.

A truism: Not everyone born with the surname Hitler is a fascist tyrant.

aktien, I’m not certain what you are talking about, but Glenn hasn’t missed anything and he certainly is not ignoring anything. It is actually possible to focus attention on someone who is an ongoing player in a bigger picture, and still see the bigger picture. He is not “enabling” the left or allowing the true issues to get past. I’m not certain when this habit of insisting that by talking about specifics one actually harms the cause they represent became popular, but it is ineffectual and baseless. Pull back a bit, atkien. Anyone can see that Glenn’s knowledge and topics are widespread, fair and comprehensive. If you don’t think so, just watch MSNBC and how many shows are devoted to venom against whatever topic Glenn discussed. He presents facts, he never used Fox News as a personal bully pulpit like Schultz and Rachel Ray, and, while he has one of the largest privately funded networks in the world, he is, contrary to the complete nut jobs on the left, fair, balanced and factual. If he is enabling the left by missing out on the “real” facts, then present your evidence. I can virtually guarantee that he has presented every subject that you could possibly come up with.

I am not disagreeing with that statement, but I, also, will not deny that there is a core group of Rothschilds that are at the “head” of that family, that do have those ideas. Same with the Morgans, Rockefellers and several others, not ALL are a part of it, but there is a core group as “heads” of those families that are a part of it. I could also see anyone within the family that does not go along with it getting cast out, losing their inheritance or some such thing. That is probably how they have kept up with doing the things they are doing for so long.

I would also agree that there are factions within thoise same groups, but that probably has more to do with the fact that they are trying to get the upper hand on each other.

I would also agree that there are probably some groups of those rich people that are on the other side, but they are probably not as big in number.

I think they have not achieved their goals simply because they are going about it in a certain way. I.E. not trying to cause civil wars and such. They figure if they can get a populace to go along willingly, that is better than forcing the issue. I , also, think they are getting impatient. They have been trying to do this for a long time and it has not come to be. That is why you see things like the “Arab Spring” and the collapse of the EU. People are not willingly going for it, so they are attempting to give it a little nudge, so to speak. They are doing the same thing here. Look at how polarized this country is, more so than before the last civil war.

Actually, it goes further than that. If one actually reads the bill and understands what is contained, they would see that it is a way to force single payer and put insurance companies out of business. Once that happens, the government HAS to step in to “fix” it. It will give the government control over a huge potion of our economy and everyone’s life.

As I stated to Marsbarstru17, don’t necessarily look at the conspiracy theories behind what you are reading, but look at the connections. Mars is actually correct about the factioning, that will hold true with any group of people. The most important part is the connections between all these people. The connections that the media will not tell you about.

Actually, he is correct to some degree. No one is talking about the people BEHIND Soros. Soros is a puppet of much richer people who are devoted to the New World Order. Glenn  is not reporting on them, probably, for good reason. People who go up against the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans and their ilk, generally, do not come out on the good side of things. With that being said, I can understand why Glenn and others are unwilling to speak up.

Hey Larry, you are an idiot of epic proportions.

Hey Larry, you obviously do not know shit about which you speak. Soros did not do more than anyone to end communism, that is a B S left wing talking point. Soros was a Nazi collaborator, by his own admission. You, actually, think Soros donated money to these colleges for good intentions? You think he donates money to a “non-profit” like Media Matters because of good intentions. You are one dumb M F er, drone.

By the way, more “conservatives” have a higher education than “liberals.” Dunce.

EXACTLY! Excellent summary. I completely agree.