Did Stu overreact? NPR thinks so.

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV

Stu was on NPR! Not willingly though. NPR thought Stu’s reaction to Justice Robert’s betrayal on Obamacare was so overblown and over-the-top that they just had to feature it on All Things Considered. Do you think Stu’s reaction was unwarranted? Watch above and decide!

  • Anonymous

    How about Stu and Glen start paying for all the free healthcare that Blue Cross bureaucrats decided I had to pay for if I want HCI for myself? My premiums go up every year for the last 40 years your teaparty HMO ideas SUCK. Why cna’t I buy a policy that doesn’t factor in the fact htat I got to cover the bills of those who can’t pay. HMMMMM?????  I want the option to opt out of covering the bills of the indigent with my Insurance Bill if Myth Rmoney is elected.

  • http://twitter.com/AgingRepublican PAG

    I thought his reaction was great! I love Stu & Pat…

  • http://twitter.com/onteo1 Bill

    Crawl back in your hole Barack. Insane Obama

  • Anonymous

     And then what happened?

  • Anonymous

    I believe All things considered is a Canadian program from the CBC which is hugely left wing and liberal minded.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IBPI63ABT264USBDALCN4F7UKY billy2

    THEY THOUGHT STU WAS OVER THE TOP, THAT WAS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHEN I CALLED MY REP AND SENATOR!!!!

  • Anonymous

    I think America needs people to express opinions that matter to them.  Conservaties are always supposed to take the high road.  It was refreshing to hear Stu express his opinion in a forceful way.  You go Stu!!! 

    You said you wanted to know what to do to counter the blatant lies.  I say wait until right before the election and flood the airwaves like Obama did in 2008.  Combat the lies, and all the things that Obama has done to destroy this country and our freedom in those ads.  Tell these people like idiot the truth about the costs he will have to pay now that we will be taxed for ObamaCare.  The 3 plus percent tax when we sell our homes, the transaction taxes on bank accounts and the; what it is, 21 departments to facilitate this monstrosity! 

    I don’t expect Romney will do this; I think it will require the TEA Party or one of the more organized groups that can get donations to run the ads.  Right now you are mostly talking to the choir; and Obama’s useful idiots.  We need to run the ads so people that won’t even hear about these things; or even if that did, they won’t look the information up.   

  • Anonymous

    you need to talk to the dumbs because they are tlling you your preimums arent going up. maybe send your rep a copy and ask them!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Personally I really believe that “someone” got to Roberts!!!!  I have talked to many folks and am hearing the same thing.

  • Anonymous

     You can’t buy a competitive policy because YOUR STATE AND YOUR FED GOV won’t allow you to buy ANYWHERE and design the policy you want.  Just once, call your State’s Insurance Commissioner and ask that question.  You’ll find that YOUR STATE mandates that all insurance companies that operate in YOUR STATE has legislated certain coverage to be able to sell in your state.  Sooooo, my friend, state with your State Gov and move up!!!  There is your answer.  If it were truly a “free market” I would be able to design the policy I wanted and needed and PAY A WHOLE LOT LESS for it.

  • Anonymous

    Well, Roberts slammed open the closet door and exposed his true colors on his obamacare judgment. He has shown he is a political pundit rather than an impartial judge that is placed in the Supreme Court of the land to weigh cases against the constitution. We are already totally and completely aware that obama placed political pundits on the court, but the conservatives are supposed to be above politics there and make true and honest constitutional decisions. Roberts just put himself in bed with the kagans and the sotomeyers. 

  • http://twitter.com/ScenicDrive101 BEA

    Yeeees.  Stu did over react only in the EARS of the beholders.  His message was on point, but too bad wasn’t subtitled for the hard of hearing.  Nevertheless, we heard it.  And it was laughable.  However, the intonation was funny to the conservative, and crazy–no, outrageous to the liberal– especially if this guy was from the Glenn Beck Show for GOD’s sake!!!  You know how far off in la la land Beck is– they’ve never seen or heard a Beck show; but the lib heard it once on MSNBC, so it HAS to be true…

  • Anonymous

    Well unlike Obama campaign donor Bill Maher, Stu keeps his comments tasteful and to the point.  Remember Lefties, we’re complaining about our own conservative chief justice, he failed us.  We can’t even complain about our own guy anymore??  Can we call every nasty thing being said about George W. Bush as over the top too?

  • Anonymous

    I see that you think Glenn Beck is an idiot, but who do you like?  Why not give us a glimpse of what you’re into and not what you hate?  By they way, you spelled Glenn wrong, it has two N’s.  So HE’s the idiot?  Hmmm…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Pat-Reynolds/100000048532108 John Pat Reynolds

    Stu did what most Americans would have done

  • Anonymous

    I am confused. I am against OBama care (as a conservative) because I want to choose if I want to buy healthcare or just put money in a savings when I need it and use the savings as needed. I believe OBama care somehow creates an avenue to provide healthcare for illegal immigrants and the people who believe if welfare is there why not use it.  If you look at other comments, one is from a Democrat who has said what I have heard from other Democrats they like O’Bama care because it forces everyone to buy insurance, therefore they are relieved of paying for someone else s healthcare. I don’t think Democrate or Republican are for supporting other people. The one question that I still have is – if people don’t have healthcare because they can’t afford it, how are they going to afford it if they don’t have the money? You can tax them, but if they don’t file taxes, they don’t pay. I have a neighbor who is democrat, she wanted O”Bama care because she said her medical bills were so high she needed help. She beleives people who don’t spend as much on health care should help others. Ironically, she is for abortion because she doesn’t want to pay for the cost of raising someones child born out of wedlock.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=710268820 Daune Sutherland

    Good Buy T.V.

  • mdkrause

    He was right?  what’s the big deal. 
    Should be more like why can’t we stand together and vote in a proper president, and a honest senate and just congress.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/bishimine Barry DaKama’aina InKali

    Two options….1) Vote this November to get obama out of the oval office… (to overturn obama care and other executive orders obama passed) 2) or… Impeachment….

  • Anonymous

    Stu was ok.  How else is one supposed to react to a Turncoat?

  • Anonymous

    People tend to get really angry when they find a knife in their back.

  • Michael Mowes

    I wonder if Judge Roberts didn’t do us a favor with his vote and inally defining Obamacare as a tax by the highest court in the land.  By exposing Obamacare’s mandate as a tax, and exposing the whole thing as a Democratic scheme that actually does raise taxes on the middle class, something they still try to deny vehemently, it gives all those who hate the plan something to rally against, and, if Romney can take advantage of it, an additional reason for people to vote for the person that will work to repeal the Act.  And remember, in exposing the law as another tax on the middle class, he also clearly states that just because the law under the taxing authority of Congress is constitutional, that does NOT make it a good or wanted law (tax).  It was definitely risky, especially if the most important thing doesn’t happen, that is getting Obama out of office now, before he can ge the law imbedded into the society.

  • Anonymous

    THE TERRORIST RULING AMERICA PLANTED KEGAN AND SOTOMEYER FOR JUST THIS KIND OF PRESSURE AND THREATS AND THEY DID THEIR JOBS, I’M SURE. OLD LADY GINSBERG WAS IN ANOTHER COUNTRY (FRANCE, I THINK) A FEW MONTHS AGO TELLING THEM NOT TO PATTERN THEMSELVES (SOME OF THEM WERE CONSIDERING IT) AFTER AMERICA AND THE CONSTITUTION.  SHE NEEDS TO BE IN A NURSING HOME AND NOT TAKING THE TAXPAYERS MONEY FOR COMMITTING TREASON AGAINST AMERICA. I’M SURE SHE HELPED COERCE ROBERTS, TOO. ROBERTS DOESN’T NEED TO BE IN THE SUPREME COURT  IF HE IS THAT WEAK MINDED AND EASILY SWAYED.  THEY ALL HAVE BEEN THERE TOO LONG . PELOSI, REID AND THE “NEW BRIDEGROOM” SICKENING BARNEY FRANK NEED TO BE IN A NURSING HOME, ALSO.  CONGRESS CONDONES EVERYTHING THE TERRORIST AND HIS CRONIES DO OR THEY WOULD STOP HIS CRIMES, HAVE HIM ARRESTED AND SENT TO GITMO ALONG WITH HOLDER, PELOSI AND REID, ASAP. 

  • new2la

    Robert’s decision has caused people to stand up and take notice…..our citizens are angry. When people get angry, they respond and it will be at the polls.

  • Anonymous

    His reaction was exactly like mine would have been had I been able to find my voice.  I couldn’t speak for several minutes I was so stunned! 

  • Anonymous

    I too was very upset with Roberts decision, but I look at it as Roberts giving Obama a “gotcha”.  Obama was so sure the conservative judges would deem the law as unconstitutional and would give him ammunition against the GOP, but instead he now has to defend Obamacare and explain it to the American people why when he said it wasn’t a tax it is a tax.  I love seeing the Dems trying to dance around the questions.  Now Romney has to continue the rhetoric reminding the American people how this will affect the poor and middle class.
     
    I also feel that the GOP has to withdraw their appealing of Obamacare and start pusing the cost agenda to the middle class.  It is a TAX, not a penalty.  Wait until after the elections to appeal this costly bill.  Right now, it’s a waste of time and will go nowhere.  The Dems will continue to make the GOP look like they’re a bunch of sore losers and they have other pressing issues to discuss.  The GOP needs to stop the funding of additional hiring of IRS employees which are needed to carry-out the new tax laws.  Remind the people continuously about how this is not cost effective and it will affect everyone.

    I think Stus reaction to the ruling was rather calm, considering.  I don’t think Roberts will necessarily rule with the liberals in the future.  This was just a payback.

  • Anonymous

    Stu, you’re far too calm about “the issue”.

    Since the Supreme Court has determined that the individual mandate is a tax;

    a) How can Obamamcare possibly stand, as a capricious application of
    Federal taxation (due to the many waivers), unlike the progressive tax
    code, which is convoluted but applies to everyone without exception.

    Once again, because of the waivers, 1200 or so I understand, this constitutes capricious Federal taxation!

    b) Obamacare was carefully structured and “sold” on the basis of not
    being a tax. Does that not constitute misrepresentation of an imposed
    contract (with demonstrable consequent damages)? Never mind the idea of
    an imposed contract!

    Another issue; How can the decision stand with the participation of
    Justice Elena Kagan, regardless of her vote, due to her participation in
    crafting defense strategies for the law?

    And finally, the quote below * from the decision is all wrong. The
    Supreme Court’s only legitimate function is to insure that the
    Constitution is not violated as a matter of protecting the people from
    misapplication of law or inappropriate legislation.

    * quote from the Obamacare decision —

    ” Members of this Court are vested with the authority to interpret the
    law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy
    judgments. Those decisions are entrusted to our Nation’s elected
    leaders, who can be thrown out of office if the people disagree with
    them. It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of
    their political choices.”

    — end quote — 

  • Anonymous

    Well What Do You Expect Form   N.P.R. {Nazi Propaganda Radio} The Truth ??????
     Stew Calls Them Like He Sees Them, MY KIND OF GUY, NO BULL SHIT !!!!!!!!!
      HIS Opinion Is One That I Share Full Hartley …………… I’m Beginning To Think,
      Roberts Was Bought And Payed For, Seen This Stuff With The “ERECTIONS”,
      That Is Right, “ERECTIONS” SOME ONE HAS GOT TO GET SCREWED …..
      OBUMMER BOUGHT Off NEBRASKA, & God Knows Who Else, In His Bid For The
      Presidency …. U Go Figger……

  • Anonymous

    There are those who call Obamacare the useless eater bill.

  • Anonymous

    There are those who call Obamacare the useless eater bill.

  • Anonymous

    Allen West set the best mockery of this decision:
    Every American will be required to buy a glock, with a tax penalty if they don’t.
    Isn’t that basically what Roberts ruling has accomplished.
    Wonder what they will mandate next.

  • Anonymous

    Allen West set the best mockery of this decision:
    Every American will be required to buy a glock, with a tax penalty if they don’t.
    Isn’t that basically what Roberts ruling has accomplished.
    Wonder what they will mandate next.

  • Anonymous

    We must have a better way to get judges on Supreme Court. There ought to be term limits. Term limts on our elected officals as well. What Roberts did was a CLEAR VIOLATIONON OF HIS OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION. He was to protect the American people not LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH in an UNConsitutional manner to take away our freedoms, and expand the federal government beyond ANYTHING THE FOUNDERS COULD HAVE IMAGINED. IT WAS PURE TYRANNY!

  • Anonymous

    We must have a better way to get judges on Supreme Court. There ought to be term limits. Term limts on our elected officals as well. What Roberts did was a CLEAR VIOLATIONON OF HIS OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION. He was to protect the American people not LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH in an UNConsitutional manner to take away our freedoms, and expand the federal government beyond ANYTHING THE FOUNDERS COULD HAVE IMAGINED. IT WAS PURE TYRANNY!

  • Anonymous

    tinyurl.com/cozaa3k

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1827021853 Jacqueline Fields

    Wow! That’s all you said? you should have heard me, after I learned of the decision! (and I’ve always been considered a lady)I feel as though we’ve been utterly betrayed by the judges. We knew that the Obama appointees where going to vote for this mess, but I did think that there where a couple of the judges that weren’t total ideologues! So Stu, I congratulate you on your restraint! I think that the supremes need term limits, and that they should be voted in, and not appointed! And the NPR? who cares WHAT they think!  As for me, I’m signing every petition out there to repeal obamacare, and I’ve called my Congressmen as well.