Glenn was right, Libya edition: stunning new report

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV

Glenn will have much more on this story Monday night at 5pm ET on TheBlaze TV. Don’t miss it!

Just a few days after the Benghazi attacks Glenn called out the administration’s phony youtube theory and posited one of his own. That theory was that Chris Stevens was overseeing the efforts by the administration to arm the rebels fighting Ghaddafi. Glenn goes over the Business Insider report showing there is ‘growing evidence’ that suggests Amb. Stevens was at least aware of heavy weapons being moved to rebel forces.

“The president is out on the stump speech right now saying that he’s really decimated Al‑Qaeda, but if you go back to when we went into Libya, again the New York Times was reporting that we may be arming the wrong people. We may actually be arming Al‑Qaeda. Do you remember that happening during the Arab Spring?” Glenn said.

“They said we were arming Al‑Qaeda. The White House denied it. My speculation was right after the September 11th attacks that not only was this an attack by rebels, this wasn’t due to a video, this was due to the fact that Christopher Stevens was the gun‑runner. He was the guy brokering the deals with Al‑Qaeda‑related affiliates. That was my speculation.”

Now what has the Business Insider found? Their report is below:

The official position is that the US has refused to allow heavy weapons into Syria.

 But there’s growing evidence that U.S. agents—particularly murdered ambassador Chris Stevens—were at least aware of heavy weapons moving from Libya to jihadist Syrian rebels.

In March 2011 Stevens became the official U.S. liaison to the al-Qaeda-linked Libyan opposition, working directly with Abdelhakim Belhadj of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group—a group that has now disbanded, with some fighters reportedly participating in the attack that took Stevens’ life.

In November 2011 The Telegraph reported that Belhadj, acting as head of the Tripoli Military Council, “met with Free Syrian Army [FSA] leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey” in an effort by the new Libyan government to provide money and weapons to the growing insurgency in Syria.

Last month The Times of London reported that a Libyan ship “carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey.” The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades. 

Those heavy weapons are most likely from Muammar Gaddafi’s stock of about 20,000 portable heat-seeking missiles—the bulk of them SA-7s—that the Libyan leader obtained from the former Eastern bloc. Reuters reports that Syrian rebels have been using those heavy weapons to shoot down Syrian helicopters and fighter jets.

The ship’s captain was “a Libyan from Benghazi and the head of an organization called the Libyan National Council for Relief and Support,” which was presumably established by the new government.

That means that Ambassador Stevens had only one person—Belhadj—between himself and the Benghazi man who brought heavy weapons to Syria.

Furthermore, we know that jihadists are the best fighters in the Syrian opposition, but where did they come from?

Last week The Telegraph reported that a FSA commander called them “Libyans” when he explained that the FSA doesn’t “want these extremist people here.”

And if the new Libyan government was sending seasoned Islamic fighters and 400 tons of heavy weapons to Syria through a port in southern Turkey—a deal brokered by Stevens’ primary Libyan contact during the Libyan revolution—then the governments of Turkey and the U.S. surely knew about it.

Furthermore there was a CIA post in Benghazi, located 1.2 miles from the U.S. consulate, used as “a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles” … and that its security features “were more advanced than those at rented villa where Stevens died.” 

And we know that the CIA has been funneling weapons to the rebels in southern Turkey. The question is whether the CIA has been involved in handing out heavy weapons from Libya.

In any case, the connection between Benghazi and the rise of jihadists in Syria is stronger than has been officially acknowledged.

“You follow this? The guy we worked with is the guy doing these deals. Our ally Turkey is ‑‑ knows all about it. Our ally, the prime minister, who’s the best friend of Barack Obama? Who’s the one he was the first one to call? He didn’t call, not Tony Blair, he didn’t call Gordan Brown. He didn’t call anybody. The first guy he called was Turkey’s leader. He’s the closest to Turkey’s leader,” Glenn said.

“Turkey is taking the arms from Libya and shipping them into Syria. Reuters also reports that satellite photos exposed a CIA post in Benghazi located 1.2 miles from the consulate. It was used as a base, among other things, for collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from the Libyan government, including surface‑to‑air missiles. And that its security features were more advanced than those at the rented villa where Stevens died. We also know that a dozen CIA operatives and contractors left the Benghazi base after it was exposed. Could the two CIA groups be connected as a start‑and‑end points to help funnel heavy weapons to the Syrian opposition. The answer is yes. We know that the CIA has been funneling weapons to the rebels in southern Turkey. CNN reports that FSA members are cutting their own deals to get weapons from well‑armed extremists.”

“So it raises questions on who the CIA is arming. We also know that U.S. weapons are now ending up in the hands of hardline Islamists in Syria. It turns out that many of the jihadists are the same ones, the same people that Stevens helped arm to topple Muammar Gaddafi.”

“Now here we go. Who was he having dinner with? On September 11th. September 11th he was having a meeting with the Turkish ambassador, the guy who’s involved in the gun‑runnings.  He’s having dinner and he leaves from dinner 40 minutes early.  The consulate is surrounded and he dies.  Eerie coincidence?  I think not.  This is the truth of what happened in Benghazi.”

  • MarsBarsTru7

    Okay, so considering all that, why and how was our government (the Obama Administration) prepared to blame the whole thing on the YouTube video? What purpose did that serve? Who benefited most from the confusion? Who benefited most from Amb. Stevens’ death? Was he eliminated to erase ties?

    I’m not much of a believer in coincidence. So to me, coincidental incompetence doesn’t cut the mustard. Some purpose was served in this. What is still hidden? Is it an elaborate distraction (I’m leaning against that possibility)? If so, from what? I feel like there is something I’m missing that I should be able to put a finger on.

    The news media sure isn’t attempting to put two and two together. I guarantee this would be as big if not bigger than the Iran-Contra Affair if it was a Republican in the White House… Of course, if it was a Republican in the White House this wouldn’t have all played out in this way.

    • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

      This will be bigger than Iran-Contra Affair; in the end it will sweep away all previous scandles and presidential fiascos by far.

      With the death of UBL, Obama has been living in a fantasy world that Al Queda has been finished as a force. This one attack, plus the other protests/attacks on other embassies shows Al Queda and its branches are still alive, well, and very dangerous.

      The video blame, UN speeches about ‘respecting the prophet’ and such by Obama and other nations are being used to advance the Islamist agenda of speech control and thus political and religious control.

      Al Queda, Muslim Brotherhood, Iran and her proxies, all benefit the most from this rise in chaos they control (yes control, look how fast it ended when their goals were done). It damages the credibility of our President (domestic and foreign), pushes Israel further into a defensive stance, emboldens the morale and determination of the Islamist bands, and opens new routes to them for gains politically and religiously in other Mid Eastern lands.

      The ambassador was collateral damage in the larger sceme of things (and no he was a human being, as were the other three dead, I see them that way personally); their dying ensured the storm would be triggered.

      If Obama retaliates against either Libyan groups or Iran, they can claim to the world that the United States is being the aggressor and gain domestic and international support and then ‘strike out to defend themselves.’ If nothing is done, they win as well for their taking a stand, theoloically, against the ‘Great Satan.’

      Also, in any weakness shown, more attacks such as that recently stopped by the FBI in NYC, can be expected, and some of them will succeed just by sheer odds. Look at the domestic terror of the anthrax letters and the beltway sniper to see what simple attacks can cause in sheer terror and panic.

      The admin itself is either grossly incompetent or willfully neglegent in this regard; the coverup is deliberate and falling apart rapidly…along with Obama’s sanity.

      Understand well, we can expect more pressure to come in the Middle East and from the support many of those countries have in Russia and China. This is their hour and day to rise out from the dominating shadow of America, and it will only last until Romney comes into the Presidency (God willing it be so).

      It is a win-win-win situation save for one means – if they cannot force us in America to change the way we deal with things at home by giving up yet more of our freedoms, then they ultimately lose.

      • Deborah White

        Thought you might be interested in this:

        Intercepts Show Attackers on U.S. Co…

        • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

          Thanks, a fair portion of this I already knew; I will pass these links along.

          • MarsBarsTru7

             See my response to White’s Daily Beast link comment.

        • MarsBarsTru7

           Anon is attempting to discredit Republicans/Republican allies. That’s it. The only “information” he/she has is aimed to that end. There is nothing verifiable in his/her speculation that would lead one to the same conclusions he/she is making.

          • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

            Good point. I have examined the posts of Anon three times and come to the same conclusion.

      • MarsBarsTru7

         We need to temper our attempts to figure things out with the same scrutiny that we show information that seems suspect. The Obama Administration has discredited itself repeatedly from the beginning, so it is easy to form speculations on what their aims and purposes might be, outside of what they state themselves.

        That they’re reaping the mistrust that they sowed themselves is not in doubt. They earned this kind of scrutiny and speculation. However, it does not behoove us to treat our own speculations as if they’re fact, or to tread in the realm of possibilities and treat our ideas as if they were self evident.

        That something insidious has happened is clear. The facts themselves show as much. At the very least this administration is culpable for death and deception on the surface level. But, it would be naive of us at this point to accept this superficial show as all there is to know on the matter. Still, even as we delve into it, and attempt to piece together the puzzle that seems apparent, it is important to remember how much is still our own speculation and conjecture at this point.

        My suggestion: We preface the portions of our discussion that are distinctly our speculative attempts to solve the mysteries involved in this with phrases like “I posit…” or “I think…”, just to avoid confusion on our own part as well as others that may read our comments. And understand, I say this as I want to guard against myself doing this very thing (thinking/typing out loud), not just in response to what you and others have posted.

        That said, I find your idea that the Islamists benefit from this the most intriguing and it compels me to share a thought I had earlier today that I shared with my wife: Is it possible that Obama and the cronies he ushered into bureaucratic positions with him are deliberately and distinctly attempting to help guide the Islamic world toward unifying into a global/super-Caliphate, as the Ottoman Empire once was? We know that this is a goal of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Ottoman Empire has only been gone from existence for less than 100 years. Why else support the Islamic radicals against what is relatively secular government in comparison? Obviously the religious fervor of jihad is not a fire we want to kindle, but that is exactly what is happening with our ongoing support for the “Arab Spring” rebels throughout the Muslim world.

        • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

          Good posting, there is much to think on in it.

          To your questions at the end…

          Is Obama aiding the Muslim Radicals (M Brotherhood, Al Queda and the like) to restoring the Caliphate/globally? Possible.

          Obama carries an anti colonialist attitude agaginst Israel; seeing it as a mistake, a abhorance forced onto the Middle East by Britian and USA over the wishes of the Arab people – mind you, it was done under the auspicouses of the United Nations.

          I think he is, in my opinion, using the radicals to ‘correct’ that mistake in his mind. He gives them the opportunity to restore the Caliphate that had been stolen from them, and aids in the downfall of Israel by not supporting that nation in any conflict that comes.

          The Muslim Brotherhood is using Obama in turn to advance step by step their agenda of the Global Caliphate. The plan seems to be the time honored and proven one – if you cannot seize a nation by the external conquest, take it over from within…and Obama appears to be giving them the opportunity, maybe unknowingly.

          There is a third, larger, and more directing force in the shadows not to forget about. A member of the Fabyian society who seek to change the world to their vision by heating it up (conflict and strife): George Soros, who has his hands in many areas of the world.

          Personally, I think Soros is playing both sides off against one another for his own gains and that of his children and the Fabyan society.

          In the speculation of the Muslim Brotherhoods actions I can be more assured of it for one major reason, many of my kin are members of that gathering of fanatics – for me becoming a christian they almost killed me when I was sixteen.

          • Anonymous

            Where does the US election play in all of this? And the growing possibility of a Romney presidency?  I am scared to death something will happen to Romney before the election and/or the swearing in.  Thankfully, the election is  only 2 weeks away.
            To them the ends justify the means and Soros and his ilk thrive on chaos.

          • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

            As of now, Soros has no more major rolls to play in the upcoming elections. He has put his pieces into play and with Van Jones/Hillary, set the stage for 2016/2020.

            What matters now is the ultimate wild card, Mr Obama, who is completely insane. There is now no telling what he will do.

          • Anonymous

            You think that’s the ticket in 2016 with Van Jones on it? Really??? Hopefully, Soros will be dead by then.
            Why do you think that? Last week he called Romney a douche twice on tv. He’s even worse than Obama. That
            truly would be the end. How could he pull that off?

          • Tony Baker

            Bingo!  I think you are more right than you could possibly know.  The secret to all this is not figuring out Benghazi or Al-Qaeda.  The secret is knowing Obama and what his goals are.  Most do not know Obama at all.  Obama real motivation is “Anti-Colonialism”.  In that, Obama sees the whole world as either “Occupiers” or “Occupied”, one or the other.  Obama sees the Arabs as “Occupied” and therefore they are “Justified” to defend themselves against Occupiers.  It’s not that he is a Muslim or any of these other wild, nutty things we all here.  It is really quite simple.  Obama considers it his lifes mission to bring justice to the sins of Colonialism, world wide.  Once one firmly accepts that of Obama, EVERY decision and action he does comes into much clearer focus.  Remember, Obama is NOT stupid.  Obama is NOT making mistakes, at least to himself.  Obama is doing exactly what Obama intended to do all along!  Just because we did not know, does not keep it from being so. 

    • Erin

      Not sure if you have anything to do with Alex Jones or not-but right now he has a video on the right hand side of his site( It’s labelled “Webster Tarpley: CIA Has Fingerprints All Over Benghazi Assault” …if that interests you, also watch the video posted right under that “Douglas J. Hagmann: Death Race Damascus!!”   People need to start waking up to what is about to happen to all of us.

    • Julie Poling Erickson-Masino

      this is very serious scary stuff

    • Donwayne Dunavant

      I certainly agree that if the Republicans were in office these four Americans would still be alive,because this would not been allowed to happen.Terrist don”t need another reason to kill all Americans, because they have said and proved to hate all Americans and want all of us dead.They love killing and fighting,because of all the hate in there hearts and there thinkings and there teachings and there believings.They all have a messed up idol and religion.They are sick people……. 

      • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

        I have to disagree with you on the four still being alive at this point if a Republican was in the white house. By now though, a Republican President would have brought swift, brutal and massive justice down on their murderers to show the terrorist bands “Attack one of us, and you attack all of us.”

        • Anonymous

          That IS one of many differences between the two parties. It’s a big one!

    • Anonymous

      Fast and furious east. And the same thing in Jordan. Whoever the broker in that deal is, he’d better watch his back. I seem to recall another poor fool that got on the wrong side of Hilary during the Clinton years , Mighty convienment “suicide”.

    • Anonymous

      Remember, Obama’s administration never lets a crisis go to waste. Blaming the attack on the video gave an air of credibility to Obama’s scheduled United Nations talk on why it is important to suppress free speech, especially hate speech against a religion, particularly Islam. Yes, he did say no video should cause someone to kill. DUH!  
      Also not heavily reported is the fact that UN goals are being supported by Hilary Clinton who signed some agreement to limit weapons in the hands of citizens throughout the world, including the USA. Can’t gain support for changing the US Constitution? Go through the UN.  

    • Anonymous

      What would not surprise me is, perhaps this so called video was a fabrication. A movie made by friends in Hollywood. Since when is someone’s face covered head to toe when arrested? The entire thing is a sham start to finish. The video guy got arrested quickly, no?

  • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

    Obama has once again lied, denied, and covered up this mess of his own crafting. Its long past time for the truth to come out in full. All the crimes and deeds of Obama and his admin need to be seen for the vile darkness they are.

  • Anonymous

    Why did Obama lie about YouTube?  Because he needed to an excuse that would make the whole thing seem spontaneous and would not lead back to the fact that the White House and the State Department had reduced security in order to limit the number of potential whistle-blowers.  Who were the first whistle-blowers to call the White House, Rice, and Hillary on their lies:  The staff in Benghazi who asked for more security.

    • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

      To answer part of your question, I would suggest reading the post of MarsBars and my reply.

  • Sam Fisher

    So basically it was because Obama tried to befriended terrorist that these four guys died see left this is what making peace with terrorist get you.

    • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

      More than just that – take a look at the post for MarsBars and my reply, they may explain some portions of this better.

      • Deborah White

        Maybe you or someone else can answer a question that has been bugging me about this. The YouTube video…was it in play before the Benghazi attack? Or did it come into play after Obama used it as a cover?
        As I understand, it is a months-old YouTube video. Were other countries rioting over this video before the Benghazi attack? Or did all the middle eastern protests begin as a result of Obama “outing” the video for his own cover-up of Benghazi?

        • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

          The video was put on youtube roughly a year before Benghazi; and the administration did not start using the video-excuse until the second or third day after the attacks and death of the four men.

          The protests themselves were organized as a cover and demonstration for the militants who did the attack and murders.

          • Paolina

            So Glenn is saying a sitting US president, Obama, is arming Al Qaeda? I believe the evidence does point that way. However, doesn’t that give credence to say, 9/11 truth claims? After all, if ONE US president is a traitor, why not two?

            If we say one president was backing terrorists it brings the whole house of cards down, the whole idea the president is above murdering his own people (which is a lie but a comforting one americans need to sleep at night).

          • Anonymous

            Why not his entire administration? Fast & Furious started in 2009, yet the administration insists it was started by the Bush administration. This entire thing defines Rahm Emmanuel’s premise of not letting a good crisis go to waste!

          • Paolina

             P.S. I understand now why the Islamists would kill the guy who gave them weapons (our ambassador).

            Imagine you are an islamist extremist, the last thing you want is people to know the USA financed you!!!

          • Sherm Stevens

            Clearly, this is an assassination of Amb Stevens. This HAS to get out to the public.

          • Deborah White

            Thanks. That answered some of my puzzlement. But I am still a little confused. Were there protests already going on in other places in relation to the video BEFORE the Benghazi attack? Or did the protests erupt in relation to the video AFTER the Benghazi attack and Obama “outed” the video as a cover?This video timeline is bothering me.
            1. If no one had heard of the video until Obama used it as a cover, who in the Obama administration knew of it beforehand in order to seize upon it instantly as a cover.2. If no one had heard of the video BEFORE the Benghazi attack, they would have had to pre-plan to use the video.3. Who, in the midst of a terrorist attack, runs to YouTube to hunt a video to use as cover? How did they know this obscure video existed?4. Who authorized its use as a cover?

            5. They knew IN REAL TIME the attack was a terrorist attack and yet they arrested the maker of this video as a scapegoat for Obama.6. The actors and participants in this video have had their lives threatened. They have since come out and said they were fooled into making this movie/video.Some have filed lawsuits against the maker/producer/director/. I assume in order to protect themselves from the Muslims calling for their deaths.7. If the video was known before the Benhgazi attack and was indeed a “cause” of the protests (whether or not the protests were planned) then I can understand why Obama would use the video as a cover, being as how it was already being used as a cause for violence in the Middle East.8. If the video was first used by the Obama crowd for cover, then I smell big rat. As stated before, how then did they know about the video in order to use it as cover almost instantly within hours of the attack. They even had drones and phone conversations IN REAL TIME  with the ones in Benghazi. They were sending back feed of the attack IN REAL TIME. There are 3 sources now saying Obama had documents and data on his desk within hours of the attack, so they all knew it was a terrorist attack right from the get go.9. So, did Obama have something to do with this video? It popped up way too conviently at a moments notice, if in fact, it was only brought to light AFTER THE BENGHAZI ATTACKS were in progress.Thanks in advance to whoever answeres this as I am about to pull my hair out on the video timeline.

          • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

            I’ll try to answer your questions to the best I can:

            As to who knew of the video, I do not know at this time.

            It’s easy enough for the video to be found, the database archives for the national intelligence services are vaster than most people realise. So finding it would be easy.

            Authorization to use a video in propaganda, to cover up the truth of the attacks and the arms transfers can only come from one final authority – the President.

            This is confirmed by the actions of Reagan in the Iran – Contra, Kennedy with Bay of Pigs invasion and other special and secret operations of national interest.

            You are right with the maker of the video; his arrest on parole violations is incidental. He was to be used for a scapegoat to keep interest in the matter shifted away from the administration.

            In the end – the video is a shiny distraction, a decoy as is the video’s maker. The final one who is accountable for the entire mess is Obama himself, he authorized the arms transfers and support of a terrorist band, and then the coverup that followed.

            His decisions, his lies, he is ultimately the bearer of the most blame and accountability as he is the head of the government.

          • snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

            Deborah, scroll down if you have not alredy done so to the post of MarsBars and my reply to them. It may clear up other questions you have as well.

  • Ken DeWitt

    The one missing element to this is that this was SUPPOSED to be a hostage situation, where Ambassador Stevens is kidnapped by the Islamists in Benghazi, all caught on video from the drone camera. Then Obama swoops in with the special forces which were staged in the area and becomes the hero to the American voters. That was the plan, but two former Navy SEALS thwarted the plans as they heard the gun fire, ran to the chaos, and unknowingly escalated this to 4 dead Americans and thereby saving this country from the secret plans of Obama.

    • DavidNine

       Ashley said I’m impressed that a person able to get paid $4474 in 1 month on the network. have you seen this(Click on menu Home)   

    • DavidNine


      • XenaWP80

        SPAM!!!! David and Ashley, go take a hike and get lost!

    • Chris Alan Hendrickson

      I never thought of that! You are prob right and thats sick!!!!!! Obama has to go!!!!!

      • Gloria C-Blackshear

        @twitter-88017937:disqus aids in the downfall of Israel by not supporting that nation in any conflict that comes.  Jesse responded I didnt even know that anybody able to profit $4075 in a few weeks on the computer. have you read this site

        • XenaWP80

          SPAM!!!  Jesse go take a hike and get lost. So annoying!

    • Anonymous

      What you say makes sense. I felt like there was something missing at the end of Glenn’s story. I would put nothing past Barack HUSSEIN Obama.  I hope Romney’s secret service detail is very attentive and watchful.  I hope he has some private guys, too, like Glenn has.    I hate to think what could happen.

    • Anonymous

       Maybe with obama he would stoop to any level ????????????????????/

    • Susann Marchette

       so shall we assume that it was a staged thing to cover up what was really going on and make Obama look good at the same time, scarry stuff!

  • Kemp Skidmore

    It seems that Obama’s Administration found out that this info was going to come out so they tried to cover it up or stop the info from getting out and maybe, just maybe it was all planed. 

  • Anonymous

    our president is a disgrace!  he is always on the wrong side of every issue.  vote him out people !!

  • Stacy Mack

    he is on the wrong side..because he was NEVER on OUR side!

  • Tracy Henry Brown

    Another “conspiracy theory” I’ve heard was that Ambassador Stevens was to be kidnapped (with Obama approval) to secure the release of the Blind Sheik as Egypt had been demanding. Securing Stevens release just days before the election, making Obama look like a hero. Two ex-SEALS being at the consulate was not expected and when they fought back, the 4 Americans were killed, thus the cover-up begins. 

  • Anonymous

    The maker of the You Tube video could have also lost
    his life with their LIE! His life will most likely not be the same
    for quite some time. Could he sue this adminastration for
    willfully pointing the finger at him, to divert their coverup?

  • Anonymous

    He was 1 of o’homo’s past expendable luvers.

  • Donwayne Dunavant

    I have alot to say about this subject being a American as i am and always will be and always have been.The most important thing of it all is that president Obama,Joe Biden,Hilliary Clinton,The defense department and others have Ambassador Stevens and the Three other Americans blood on there hands and all should be run out of the country.It makes my heart hurt for those that died and there familys.GOD BLESS THEM ALWAYS.Don D. 

  • Lee

    Fact to the matter is although this was a ill forgotten film about Ali it still was excuse for the brotherhood of Islam to spark a simultaneously plan attack in a few short hours on 9-11 that begot terrorism in Benghazi. 

    • XenaWP80

      Fact OF the matter is extremnist islam hardly needs an excuse to kill Americans. Any excuse will do. They are indoctrinated to hate “big satan & little satan”

  • Dave Silva

    it would not surprise me to find out obama was funding the rebellion, and he had the USA entirely fund the arab spring.

    • Anonymous

       There no further mention of that obama was illegally soliciting and getting illegal donations from the Middle East ,I’m petty sure it was not much coming from Israel after he thrown Israel under the bus !!! But mostly coming from enemies fractions of United States and Muslims caliphate countries under Iran leadership to affect our election for them to have a weaker or incompetent obama to remain in office!! Or it’s for their obama Trojan horse to remain in office to do more damage to the great Satan (U.S) and aid and abets and arm enemies of United and to run interference so the radical Muslims Caliphate can form more rapidly and expand to take over the world with Shari Law ????????????? I guest the investigations hearings delay results because obama stall in  the releasing of info from his campaign!! So illegal actions won’t be  judge n until after the elections then it be too late !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    The day the video was blamed I checked youtube for it and found it. At that time it had only 40,000 hits and I’m guessing 35,000 hits were AFTER it was used as a scapegoat. I’m sure at least 35,000 people world wide looked for it and found it. That would leave at best a few thousand hits in 10 months prior. There is no way that this video could have been seen by that many Islamic extremists previous to the attacks in Egypt and Libya.

    • kathy jones

      What happened to the guy who made that film? has anybody interviewed him, why are there no public statements from him?

    • Anonymous

       I heard on Rush Limbaugh radio show from his sources  that only 18 people view he had someone look it  up & check ??? this info at that time ,that’s if I got his statement right ???????????????????????

  • Anonymous

    Obama should be impeached and tried for treason….

  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

    We all must look for possible game plans for the entire Middle EAST  of obama by going back to the Libya revolt 1.) obama encourage the Arabic  Spring 2.)  Many of the Middle East dictator governments were rule by aging leaderships even if they have strong tie to the Muslims caliphate movement sand Iran !! citizens were seeking a change!!  3.) Libya Muslims Brotherhood help incite people to revolt with obama encouragement under false ruse it’s for Democracy the true freedom fighters and their start a long hard slug with Libya dictator army losing many of it’s leaders and true fighters for Democracy greatly weaken 4.) look at the perfect timing of obama when the revolt about ready to fail and most important when Benghazi about to fall to the dictator troops ,obama acted no fly zone,start taking out dictator tanks and artillery,planes and arming of our enemies radical fractions ,AL-Qaeda fractions either Iran or Saudi Arabia  base!!!  Then radicals laying back until the true freedom fighters been weaken and the terrorists central stronghold of Benghazi was being threaten by dictator troops this is when obama makes his ruse moves to aid the revolt by really giving to aid and arm  to our enemies to  ,make like they were the key components in victory,falsely!! While the true freedom fighters did all the sacrifice ! This was to gain political capital to gain major portion of new government !!! Now Iran and obama were using a two sided coin against the true fighters who did the long slug out with the dictator and the  free world in having a  more friendly country of Libya (it was fix con game that true freedom fighters  would lose in the end)  Iran & obama figure if the dictator remain in power they still not a ally complete ally of U.S ,but if things look bad for dictator only matter of time before he fall they have on the tale end of revolt to sponsor for Muslims Brotherhood  and radicals fractions to take the leadership and control  of revolt and bring much stronger radical government with closer ties to Iran for the Muslims caliphate !!  Why did obama waited to act until the radicals Muslims stronghold was at risk and why not before when the true freedom fighters for Democracy needed help ????????????????????????????????????????//  Hey obama perfect timing to help our enemies !!!!!! Now In Syria obama and Muslims Brotherhood,Iran,Radical Muslims fractions playing the same game plan come in at the tale end and U.S arm and help our enemies !!,The only difference is this dictator is more leaning toward Iran but aging and his power is waning and citizens seeking a change !!  Hey obama why wait until now after 18,000 to 20,000 people been kill and the true freedom fighters and their for Democracy have been kill off or greatly weaken.Now obama and Iran and radicals Muslims & Muslim Brotherhood are starting the same game plan in Jordan what next Saudi Arabia ????????????? Our President obama and the Muslim Brotherhood want to encircle Israel with much more hostile nations of Muslims caliphate to wage war and wipe Israel off the face of the earth !!!   Next move  to restricts certain European nations the use of the Suez- Canal and the oil from Saudi Arabia and other gulf states cause them to become unstable with riots,revolts etc  then they will resume their game plan !!!!   They be moving faster with their game plans now because their Trojan horse in White House obama will lose the election or be impeach !!!!

    • Anonymous

       Can our House of Representative restricts funding of Arms of our enemies by C.I.A and covert operations !!!!  Is something like during World War Two we were arming Russia but they had agreement to stop any wars or aggression against our allies and respects for our citizens around the world ,not incite resentments from nations or civilians of the world against United States and it’s citizens and same goes for our allies and their citizens !!!!  Have the C.I.A or who ever must have this agreement whatever fractions they working with ,and be vetted by them , plus this possible enemy fraction must adhere to same agreement that Russia agree too ,and maintain this agreement rules at the time and during use and supplying with arms ,this be presented to close hearing of the House of Representative committee ????? 

  • Michele Grossman

    I have ran across articles like the one below, that also coincides with what Glenn stated.  

    • Anonymous

       Please read the article above ,before my computer would not let me post at  this location !!

  • Pete Za

    it’s the muslum brotherhood version of fast and furious

    • Anonymous

       ( Pertaining to the articles below)  To Michele Grossman Yes it is base on what Glenn stated of obama arming our enemies either it was complete incompetence of obama using the Muslims Brotherhood as middleman (a repeated mistake in every country) or the arming on purpose.!!  I just want put emphasize on the facts of obama perfect timing something that he control  more completely when obama started aiding and arming our enemies of Muslims Brotherhood,AL-Qaeda,radical Muslims . This perfect timing proves that obama knowingly and on purpose arm & aided our enemies !!!  Each time obama step he waits until the true freedom fighters are depleted of their manpower and leadership with a long slug out with the oppressor government !!!  Then as ruse obama come in saying he helping the true freedom fighters for Democracy ,but really arming and aiding our enemies on purpose ,like AL-Qaeda who been kind ya laying back in the fighting until both the dictator troops and true freedom fighters are greatly weaken( at this tipping point a third party of radicals could) then  move in with obama aid and weapons !!!  1.)  In the long Libya revolt why did obama waited so long in supposedly in helping  true freedom fighters,in giving a no fly zone,taking out the dictator tanks,heavy artillery and giving anti-aircraft missiles to our enemies the ,radicals like Al-Qaeda ??? Also obama waited to act for only when the radicasl and Al-Qaeda strong hold of Benghazi

  • Pete Za

    it’s the muslum brotherhood version of fast and furious

  • richard steward

    I asked for proof, and MR. Beck provided it. Now what the hell do we do.

  • linlili
  • David Evans

    Why think so singler? Multiple objectives were optional on that day. That there was just one carefully planned agenda one master plan. Haven’t you heard of the phrase-“The battle plan is the first casualty of war.” My belief and its just a belief, a general feel of why and how events unfolded in Libya that day. First the why, quite simply unknowing Islamist lackeys being manipulated into staging a Presidential October hostage capturing surprise event, for the benefit of the Republican nominee Mitt Romney. To create the equivalent of the Jimmy Carter 444 days hostage drama for Barack Obama. Was Cris Stevens an operative? Probably, but the fact that worked most against him on that faithful day transpired years earlier when he met Mitt Romney at a party, this gave DIA/CIA the “meme” they needed, looking for to try to construct a chain of events to manipulate the November elections(And yes the CIA still controls/uses Al‑Qaeda). If you look at the progression of the attack, it went from an initial ambush, to a kidnapping and/or assassination attempt, to a chase event and finally to a siege event.  Anything/everything in play, multiple options, so the exact outcome of what they attackers wanted to accomplish was at best murky.

    The DIA/CIA love to play the happenstance and coincidences “game”- call it a sickness.(I think they think its clever, but who can really say anything logical about an illogical sickness), so whenever I read a story with all of these small amount of degrees of separation, I become very skeptical.

  • Larry Hitt

    United States of Islam! Ottaman Empire, there is a plan to bring back what they once had and more. Obama is part of that plan, he has an Agenda as we all know, well some of us and this could very well be, what goes on in the Middle East is out of our sight so they can pretty much do as they please. Obama needs to go and thanks to all that help stop his Agenda from going Forward, “Forward”, isn’t that Obama’s Campaign Slogan this year, same as Fidel Castro’s many years ago!

  • Gert Kaiser

    THE TRUTH WILL PREVAIL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Mitt Romney should come out swinging on this Monday foreign policy debate !!!!  Should address obama that  a part of your foreign policy is the real  war on women and not the false one you try to label &  to plant on me !! Mr. obama you make the statement  that you encourage  Arabic spring & help to bring about change for freedoms and Democracy in the Middle East !! What obama did was a ruse in Egypt & Libya to help radicals Islam  in forming their Muslims Caliphate in these country under Iran leadership on hatred of the West and of  their freedom of religion ,speech with the base of the Caliphate standing on Shari -Law !!  Now obama didn’t hesitate when come out in protecting certain segments of the world population like no bashing Islam religion , or to bash people of Penn clinging to their religion an guns because they are not in lockstep with him !!  Our president didn’t say boo to Middle Eastern government school in brainwashing their children to hate all infidel’s Catholics, Jews ,protestants,Hindu etc everything but the Islam religion. While Catholic churches are burning and prosecution other religion than Islam !!  During his U.N he mention these faults just for cover to make like he treating every segment of population as equal ,if this was so he would of speak out long ago on the burning of Catholic churches in the Middle East etc in defending all religions  !!! Now for this Shari Law promoting in the Middle East is the real war on woman 1.) cannot not drive 2.) cannot leave their  house or go out unless escorted by a male 3.) face and body must be cover head to toe  4.) woman needs four witness to charge someone with rape !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Our President obama don’t say a word on this  war against woman segment of world population !!!  What obama is doing is helping Iran in forming radical Muslim caliphate base on Shari Law in Libya and Egypt and the next game plan in progress is Syria and he starting this process in Jordan now!!  Question how can any woman vote for obama when he encouraging a Muslim caliphate in the Middle East and to spread this to entire world  this for United States too !! With their Shari Law doing away with freedom of religion,woman rights and freedoms,and the freedom of speech !! During obama first President campaign 2008 he made a statement in one of the rare time he show his true demeanor against United States !! The statement was that he would side with Muslims world if come down to it over the western free world !! (I believe he really meant  it !!)  Beside encouraging the Arabic Spring to bring about uniting radicals fractions & countries into the Muslim caliphate he could be hiding a another factor in his devious  helping of our enemies of radicals in forming this caliphate !!! ????  The all so transparent obama administration is keeping seal all information even to congress investigator hearings!! That can prove his innocents or  his possibility of being guilty of aiding and abetting ,plus arming enemies of United States ,Israel and the Free World !!

  • Anonymous

    Beside obama arming our enemies like AL-Qaeda,Muslims Brotherhood,other radical Muslims extremist fractions group in Syria,Libya  maybe now in Jordan too!! Don’t forget about obama arming our enemies on our southern border the  ruthless drug gangs of Mexico that have strong ties or connections to radical Muslims who want to attack U.S and over throw our government !!!  Our President did this arming of Mexican drug gangs under the name of Fast and Furious and still won’t release all information concerning the arming of Mexican to our congressional investigations hearings !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • outlawed

     the saddest part is people knowing about how we have been arming one of the biggest terror threats to our country and say “we’ve been doing that for years.”  “We sell them all our old technology of weaponry.” and better yet they still will vote for the current president! 

  • Anonymous

    Hillary Clinton might of been right too !!!!!  That Hillary Clinton might of possibly in 2008 in her campaign  reveal obama possible  OCTOBER SURPRISE of 2012 !!!!  Her statement of who would answer the 3 am phone call on the red alert phone ????  Well the U.S must of had this phone call in September within minutes of the beginning attack on our Libya Embassy & consulate and U.S citizens screaming for help while they were on U.S territory in firefight that lasted 5 to 8 hours ??? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  But what did they get for a answer was it that (obama ,his cabinet ,his entire administration WAS NOT PRESENT) ????  Up to now the left wing news media and even Foxnews are focus on before and after of the attack in the Libya incident !!! Why because our con-artist President obama been distracting us with his left hand with the before the attack with the focus on a  two-bit video and with right hand distraction  on finding  & hunting down the suspects to make them pay for what they did but a long stretch out process by F.B.I investigation for a act of War !! That won’t be complete until after election !!! But there is missing time here or a gap in time that obama does not even mention or voluntary release any information about what obama and his administration doing to aid the Embassy or looking at possible action options !!! Why because the con artist obama don’t want to bring any attention to this time gap he hiding with his left & right hand distractions !!! ,people start asking question or at options and looking into what obama and his team were doing during this period ???? !!!! Now for obama OCTOBER SURPRISE during debate he can come out with any lying spin or statement on what  he and his administration were doing during this time gap of the 5 to 8 hour firefight to make Romney look bad and he know no one can challenge him  matter what he says because he is holding all the information and not releasing anything for this period !!!  He can even come out with a whopper to be synch with Halloween to awaken from the dead his obama zombies from their stupor to come out on election night !!! !  The obama  whopper of whoppers could be to account for the missing time ( That obama and his Cabinet and entire administration was abducted by space aliens for his excuse )  P.S only obama zombies will swallow this BS as being true hook,line and sinker !!  I hope the Senate and House of Representatives investigation  hearings on Libya incident will also focus on this time gap of the firefight what in world was obama doing at this time,what options he had ,,what true reasoning for his non action during this period ???? Question is obama hiding something major here which he don’t even want U.S citizens to think about this why the blank in information for this time period what obama and administration doing during the 5 to 8 hours of Libya Embassy and consulate firefights !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????????????????????????????????????????

  • sylvie

    Don’t stop their Glenn! Why was he killed and by whom? Who gains? Russia has warned Turkey to stay out of this but they did not. Russia backs Syria in this war game. Looks like Russia had a lot to gain, and I do mean A LOT! Not only does it disrupt the arms and fighters going into Syria, it exposes the USA for its part in it. So, the ‘why’ and the ‘who’ may just be a matter of common sense.

  • Linda Kline

    Or another possible scenario is that Stevens was running guns, the deal went south, and Obama, his Administration and the State Department threw Stevens to the wolves to cover up what they were doing.

  • Ben SmartMouth Keebs

The 411 From Glenn

Sign up for Glenn’s newsletter

In five minutes or less, keep track of the most important news of the day.