Can Glenn survive 2013 without mentioning ‘That guy’?

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV

Glenn has really ambitious goals for 2013 but perhaps the most ambitious of all centers around NOT saying someone’s name all year long. He has vowed not to mention or play audio of a certain President of the United States, known henceforth as ‘that guy’ and anyone on staff who does will incur serious penalty. How serious is Glenn about keeping this?

“Yes, this is the radio show, the talk radio, politically oriented show that will no longer say that man’s name, or play any of his audio,” Glenn said on radio this morning.

He was so serious about the ban that he planned to treat “that guy’s” name as a swear word. He asked his board op Sarah to dump the audio if it wasn’t mentioned in the proper context, and he started a swear jar to collect money for charity every time someone mentioned that guy or played his voice.

Of course, it’s hard for a political talk show to not mention “that guy”, and the confusing rules put in place got a little confusing. For instance, it’s OK to say Obamacare because it’s the name for healthcare policy. But you can’t say Barack Obama or Obama. Robyn can put audio from President Obama in her news broadcast, but Pat cannot play audio during the radio show.

“This is not a democracy. This is in a republic. Nobody elected me,” Glenn said. ” I’m king. That’s the rule.”

Of course, this caused some confusion later in the show when Glenn almost said “the Obama tax cuts”, prompting Stu to put Glenn on the spot exactly about how these new rules worked. In the end, it was clear the best idea was to just avoid it all together.

  • http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

    Give it seven days at least, or ten at the most, depending on how enraged Obama’s antics makes him with each passing day. Whatever Charity Glenn is going to donate that money to will probably be shocked by the volume of $20 bills that build up in his ‘Obama-name Jar.’

    • Anonymous

      Lol. So you think Obama is angry, but Beck and other right wingers are always calm and composed. That why they express their policy differences and don’t do stupid, childish things like refusing to say someone’s name.

      • SoThere

        I think Obama gets very upset when he doesn’t get what he wants.  He’s a Marxist Socialist through and through.

        There’s no debating about it, he played his hand a long time ago.

        Take your bigotry and hate somewhere else, no one is buying your stupidity anymore.  Sorry, no low information voters here.

        “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

        • Anonymous

          Lol. You think he’s a Marxist? You don’t even know what that means. Low information and low education are epidemic here. Perhaps the right wing shouldn’t have cut so much education funding.
          Yet again, if you come up with anything substantive to say, make a sentence. So far all you have is vague whining about commies, and you’re a little late for that.

          • SoThere

            I know he’s a Marxist Socialist. Hi father was a Marxist, his mother was a Marxist, he idolized Marxist professors and he’s running the country like a Marxist Socialist.

            Sorry pal but you Libtards don’t control the discussion here or anywhere except your Lib sites.

            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

          • Anonymous

            Oh I would never want to prevent you from saying such hilarious things.
            But what’s a Marxist? You have any idea? Someone who likes Duck Soup? Someone who has read a book of his?
            And is it possible for you to have a discussion without stupid name calling like a 6 year old? I guess you would have to have something to say. Is that your idea of “controlling a conversation”. Lol.

          • SoThere

            Are you back again, Libtard? Another Libtard “6 year old” gambit. It’s not working little man. You leftist have run your course.

            You have a nice whining Libtard day now, ya hear?

            You keep coming back so I must be hitting a nerve.

            It’s OK, you can whine all you want.

            LMAO

            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

          • Anonymous

            No, it’s just fun destroying you losers. All you have is name calling. Pathetic. But fun.

          • SoThere

            It hasn’t happened yet Libtard, we’re still here. Stop your whining.

            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

          • Anonymous

            You’re here all right. We like to keep you where we can keep an eye on you.
            Really, I came here to have policy discussions with Americans I disagree with. I think one person has been able to do that. Most of you just have name calling and nonsensical parroting of the lies of beck and rush. Very disappointing.

          • SoThere

            Now that kinda sounds like a paranoid schizophrenic comment, doesn’t it?

            You came here to push your ideology and nothing more. Why can’t you be honest for once? You said that the NH Rep had the right to keep people who didn’t agree with her ideology and bigotry was just fine with you. You didn’t take the time to research the fact that Cynthia Chase wasn’t a native NH citizen, she came from Rhode Island to NH in 2006. Mouthing off was more important for you, right?

            The Constitution doesn’t apply, right?

            Admit what you’re really here for. I doubt that you can be that honest! Again with the “Name calling” Libtard gambit. Hypocrite.

          • Anonymous

            The name calling is the puerile gambit.

          • Anonymous

            Definition of Marxist quite literally means, “An adherent of Karl Marx and his theories.”  Now, since literally EVERY SINGLE one of Obama’s philosophies fall right in line with Karl Marx, that alone makes Obama a Marxist, nimrod, lol.

            As for education funding, it NEEDS to be cut, as evidenced by your totally illogical arguments on this site.

          • Anonymous

            Not only is that bad logic, it’s false.

          • Anonymous

            Bad logic? LOL I was using the very definition of Marxism to define Obama as a Marxist. A Marxist is an adherent to Karl Marx and his teachings. Obama is an adherent to Karl Marx and his teachings. Using straightforward logic, Obama MUST BE a Marxist, lol. Do you even understand what logic is, or do you just choose to be an illogical libtard?

          • Anonymous

            Obama is not a follower of Marx. You haven’t shown that.
            Anything “socialist” that Obama has done has been done by every president. Of Obama is a Marxist, so we’re both Bush’s and Reagan. Is that your claim?

          • Anonymous

            Try again. Obama IS a follower of Marx. In Obama’s own words, he’s a follower of Marx, lol. You really are an idiot you know.

          • Anonymous

            Prove it. I showed video proving you a liar, where’s Obama saying that?

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, no. You showed no such video. You showed a video of Bush stating DOCUMENTED FACTS DOCUMENTED by just about EVERY SINGLE government authority on the entirety of this planet, including China, Russia, Germany, and even Canada of all places. China, Russia, German, France. They ALL said Iraq had chemical weapons. They ALL said Iraq had biological weapons. They ALL said Iraq was aquiring uranium to build nuclear weapons. And NONE of them said it because Bush told them to say it. Geesh, you keep going on with the same bogus idiocy that was proven to be bogus back even in 2002.

          • BentGhazi

            Says Mister Know-nothing.

          • BentGhazi

            He is well known for being a Marxist. Read his books. His mother, grandparents, all leaned to the left extreme. You employ many Marxist tactics in your comment attacks. I could make the case that you yourself are a Marxist, but you know that already.

          • BentGhazi

            Yes, your arguments here demonstrate how inept a practitioner of logic you are. On the plus side, you have amply demonstrated your proclivity for lying at every opportunity. Well done!

          • Anonymous

            By the way, NO ONE here parrots lies from Beck.  That’s kind of hard to do since Beck has yet to make a statement not actually backed up by the actual DOCUMENTED facts, lol.  No, if we wanted to parrot lies, we’d go to MSNBC.  Beck has ONLY been truthful and EVERYTHING he has stated thus far has been backed up by one documented fact after another.  Heck, he even used “that guy’s” own words to prove his case many times.  What more needs to be done to prove how stupid you morons on the left really are?

          • Anonymous

            Lol yeah like how they found WMDs in Iraq?

            But you sound very angry. why do you hate Americans so much?

          • Anonymous

            Nope. I don’t hate Americans. Seems you do, though, since you helped put a man in office who wants to force Obamacare down every single Americans’ throat, who wants to raise taxes on those who are actually doing the hiring in this country, who wants to re-institute the death tax, and on and on and on with his bogus policies that everyone with a working brain knows will fail.

          • Anonymous

            Yes, forcing responsibility down your throat, deal with it. You can’t mooch off the taxpayers for your health care anymore. And the estate tax only applies to estates larger than $5 million. Why do you kiss the ass of the rich?

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, do you even understand what Obamacare does? It causes EVERYONE to mooch off the taxpayers for their health care lol. That’s the single biggest problem with it.

            And I hate to break it to you, but I kiss no one’s rear but my own, lol. But what kind of an idiot must Obama be to PENALIZE those who ACTUAL HIRE ACTUAL PEOPLE by raising their taxes? Little news flash to you, son, but this will lead to more people getting unemployed, which, in turn, will LOWER overall taxable income the government actually receives. At least, that’s what’s happened EVERY SINGLE time it was done in the past. Please, take a class in economics to actually see how our economy actually works. It is clear you truly are ignorant of it, lol.

          • Anonymous

            Totally backward.
            Read the link I sent and learn the truth. You’ve been fed angry bullshit.

          • Anonymous

            Yes, you certainly are backward, lol. I’ve been fed nothing but what Obamacare actually IS and what it IS ACTUALLY DOING ALREADY. Obamacare is TAXPAYER FUNDED HEALTHCARE. That’s the whole point of it, lol. It takes from taxpayers who do NOT want it and pays out to the mooching NONTAXPAYERS who do want it. That’s how it works, lol. ACTUALLY READ it why don’t you. And again, it has ALREADY started to increase healthcare costs universally and will continue to do so for years to come. You really do have it backward, don’t you.

          • BentGhazi

            Lying and insulting people – did you read that in Dale Carnegie?

          • BentGhazi

            Army doesn’t hate Americans, he just despises people who lie to them like you.

  • http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

    Question – Glenn mentioned at the end “This is not a democracy. This is not a republic. Nobody elected me. I’m King. That’s the rule.”

    Is he using sarcasm or is this some kind of play on the way Obama plays his hands within the Presidency? Obama acts like a god-king and thus I have to wonder what is what?

    • Anonymous

      I like how you used “thus.” It made your retarded comment sound more logical. 

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000303879569 Nanette Gray

         and nothing saved yours..kool-aid drinker!

        • FARGO

          Roasted

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/7SH23UOM7PXZOMNGNAPH3X76UA Bob

           Be careful how you use the term “kool-aid drinker” as some might find that racist.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1368247395 Holley Schrader Jones

            Who gives a shit!

          • Anonymous

            If you’re racist? Only decent people.

          • Anonymous

            The term kool aid drinker refers to the mass suicide at that cult in Guyana. Nothing racist about it.

          • Guest

            The bigot preaching about racism.  Funny stuff.

          • Anonymous

            The name caller spouting nonsense.
            Prove I’m a bigot. Go ahead. What did I say? Lol. You have nothing but air.

          • http://twitter.com/fawnday Dawn Brayton

            Plus the fact lots of people actually drink Kool-aid the drink.

          • SoThere

            Are you a racist that would find that racist?

            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

      • SoThere

        Is “thus” to difficult a word for you retard?

        “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

        • Anonymous

          You mean “too” difficult a word. But I’m sure you learned that in elementary school like I did. 

          • SoThere

            Watch this Zsick, here we go, done!

            Now you never had a typo, right?

            Take a hike, bigots bore the hell out of me.

          • Anonymous

            No, not while questioning another person’s intelligence. 

            Bigots bore the hell out of you? Huh? 

          • SoThere

            Are you a bigot Zsick? People who make disparaging homophobic comments are bigots. It bugs you because he’s a liberal like you are.

          • BentGhazi

            ROTFL! I like the way you zinged that Zsicko.

          • Anonymous

            Yet, you start a sentence with “but.”  Geesh, you really are a moron, lol.

          • Anonymous

            What’s wrong with starting a sentence with a conjunction? Google it if you need to, but it’s perfectly acceptable, especially in less-than-formal contexts. 

            To know that, you’d have to study language a little beyond ninth grade. Elementary school teachers tell kids not to begin sentences with conjunctions to teach them not to write incomplete sentences. However, used properly, there is no rule against it, and you will see it done in published writing all of the time if you pay attention.

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, actually, it is ALWAYS improper to start a sentence with a conjunction and is NEVER perfectly acceptable. Where did you learn English grammar, lol? The word “but” in proper grammar must always follow a comma.

            Also, you talk about less than formal contexts? LOL There’s a laugh. News flash. ALL matters of speech are perfectly acceptable in less than formal contexts. Fragments, run on sentences, misspellings, made up words, words like ain’t, numbers in place of actual words to spell out such numbers, and so on are ALL acceptable in less than formal contexts. In less than formal contexts, NO ONE should be correcting anyone’s grammar because in less than formal contexts grammar rules do NOT apply, lol. YOU are the one who originally corrected grammar here, not me, son. I’m only pointing out your blatant hypocrisy by pointing out YOUR blatant misuse of grammar while at the same time you’re correcting someone else’s.

            Finally, yes, there IS a rule against starting a sentence with the words “and,” “or,” and especially “but.” It states plainly that in PROPER English grammar using PROPER context, you should NEVER start a sentence with “and, “or,” or “but.” Now, go back to school and learn PROPER grammar, please, son.

          • SoThere

            He’s a Zit on the rear-end of humanity.

            LMAO

          • Anonymous

            I can tell. I don’t want to be a grammar NAZI myself. I’m sure you know that. However, I wanted to point out his hypocrisy of correcting someone else’s grammar when he himself used an improper grammar mechanic.

            Now, in my view, on an internet forum such as this, grammar rules don’t apply. This is an informal setting. All that matters to me is that what is stated is understood. I could care less if someone actually begins a sentence with the word “but.” Heck, I do it myself all the time. It just shouldn’t be done when we are talking about proper grammar rules, which this zit on the rear end of humanity was so doing. Thus, making him a hypocrite for being the grammar NAZI he chooses to be.

          • http://youtu.be/XEjnyMyJYTI Sam Fisher

            I think they do it because they know they can’t win an honest debate.

          • Anonymous

            I know this is a waste of time, but I’ll take one more try. First, there is a difference between a typo and not knowing the mechanics of the English language. Second, sentences can absolutely begin with a conjunction. Like I said, google it. I’ll also post a link below for your consideration. Further, “but” only needs to follow a comma when it is conjugating two independent clauses. For example, I know what I am talking about, but you do not. This means that I am more informed but not necessarily more intelligent.

            Get it?

            http://grammar.about.com/od/grammarfaq/f/butsentencefaq.htm

          • Anonymous

            LOL Apparently, you didn’t actually READ that article where it states, from an English professor nonetheless, that you should, “Never begin a sentence with a conjunction of any kind, especially one of the FANBOYS (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so).”

            Now, I reiterate. In PROPER grammar using PROPER context the word “but” should NEVER be used to begin a sentence and should ALWAYS follow a comma. If we are talking about PROPER grammar here, you should NEVER start a sentence with the word “but.”

            With that in mind, you do NOT have a clue at all about what you are talking about, but I do. Now, how about YOU actually Google it and learn something for once, son.

          • Anonymous

            I did actually read that part, which was introduced by the paragraph beginning, “Still, the superstition persists…” If you need to look up what the word “superstition” means, please do. 

            Your reading comprehension also appears to need work if you think the point of the article was the same as the contrarian view the author used to exemplify the longstanding “superstition” that sentences should not begin with conjunctions. 

          • Anonymous

            LOL My reading comprehension is just fine, thank you. However, your’s needs a little work if you think the point of that article was that it is absolutely proper to begin a sentence with the word “but.” News flash, son. That was NOT the point of that article at all, lol.

          • Anonymous

            Now, I enjoy arguing, but this conversation has become incredibly boring. Unless you are a preteen, you are, by definition, retarded, and I do not feel comfortable belittling a retard. 

            re·tard·ed  
            /riˈtärdid/
            AdjectiveLess advanced, esp. mentally, than is usual for one’s age

          • Anonymous

            Seeing as YOU are the one who correcting someone’s typo as an incorrect grammar mechanic when YOU don’t even know PROPER grammar mechanics yourself, YOU are the retard, lol. Try again, son.

            I reiterate. In PROPER grammar using PROPER context it is ALWAYS wrong to start a sentence with the word “but.” However, this being the INTERNET FORUM that it is, grammar rules do NOT actually apply, and you have absolutely NO business correcting someone else’s improper use of “to” and “too,” especially when YOU had an improper placement of the word “but” yourself. So, retard, go back to school and actually learn about proper grammar mechanics and when they should actually be applied. You know NOT of what you speak.

      • Anonymous

        LOL  This coming from a retard.  One has to wonder.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=769116327 Love Macione

        hahaha. that was funny

  • Anonymous

    How childish can Beck get? 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503002858 Bob Schley

      How realistic can he be?

    • Pat A

      You need to lighten up. 

    • Anonymous

      Evidently some people don’t understand when grownups speak. Glen speaks for so many of us.  We really can’t stand “that guy” and wish we never had to see him or hear his voice ever again.  I will try diligently for the next four years to rid my senses of this horrible person. Sadly, he forces himself on us at every turn.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000303879569 Nanette Gray

         Yes, I agree about that guy! Glenn has it right! Why would we call that guy anything with respect when that guy treats the name of God and Jesus as a swear word! You foolish, blinded kool-aid drinkers will be so socked to see “who” this guy really represents!

        • Anonymous

          Somewhere I recall hearing something about freedom of religion or something?

      • Anonymous

        Thinking about  Katepatate post and will agree.  Listening to the cadence of “that person’s ” last news conference, the thought crossed my mind, “I don’t like this mode of speech communication — this practiced oration and it’s  rhythm of alibis, deceptions , and subterfuge. 

        • Anonymous

          Why am I not surprised that you prefer Bush’s fractured diction and invented vocabulary?

          Oh and speaking of lies, it wasn’t Obama who lied to us about WMDs to take us to war.

          • Anonymous

            @Knowitsome ‘s comment to a post is off the subject. Should have expected it. Another instance from the playbook — “make sure you turn the topic to nonsense or make a comment without any connection to the topic.”

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1507201229 Cyndy Drain

            Uh, Today22011, the ” topic” is ALREADY NONSENSE.

          • Anonymous

            Lol. Actually, it was the perfect response to your comment. You’re the one who brought up the cadence of the President’s speech. That is off topic, but conservative hypocrisy is very much on topic.

          • Anonymous

            Knowitsome, what conservative hypocrisy, lol?  There is none.  YOU are the one outright lying about Bush lying here.

          • Anonymous

            Oh, and Bush did NOT lie to us about WMDs to take us to war either.  This DOCUMENTED FACT has been proven time and time again, and there is so much evidence proving it that even most of your mainstream liberal overlords, even those at MSNBC, have flat out quit attacking Bush on it.  It is a lie ans has beena PROVEN lie since 2003, lol.  Bush did NOT lie, period.

          • Anonymous

            Of course he did. If he didn’t, where are the Iraqi WMDs? They never existed.

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, no he did NOT. But again. That is a bogus claim made ONLY by the fringe on the left now. NO sane left winger will attack Bush on something he NEVER actually lied about these days. Heck, even the idiot left wingers on MSNBC aren’t that crazy anymore because literally EVERY SINGLE FACT on the entirety of this planet proves that Bush did NOT lie about Iraq having WMDs.

          • Anonymous

            Here he is, saying it himself. I await your apology. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4RZO8y-R9k&feature=youtube_gdata_player

          • Anonymous

            No lies there. Try again, lol. Now, I await an apology from you for outright lying. Do you even know what a lie actually implies? It means the person makes a statement with the intent to deceive the populace. Now, since Bush did NOT make a statement with the intent to deceive the public, he did NOT lie. Since, the is DOCUMENTED PHOTOGRAPHIC evidence PROVING that Iraq had Biological and Chemical weapons, Bush did NOT lie. Since there is DOCUMENTED evidence from ACTUAL witnesses that Iraq was trying to aquire uranium for NUCLEAR tests, Bush did NOT lie. Try again, LIAR.

          • Anonymous

            Lol. Can’t worm your way out of it. The video doesn’t lie.

            But you and bush do.

          • Anonymous

            I’m not worming out of anything. Bush did NOT lie. Iraq had biological and chemical weapons. Iraq was in the process of aquiring uranium for nuclear weapons. There is absolutely NO lie to worm out of there. Those are DOCUMENTED facts with DOCUMENTED photographic evidence, including satellite photos no less. Seriously, you are one incredibly deluded individual, lol

          • BentGhazi

            Your source – fektubeaccount – is very anti-america and pro terrorist. They support Chavez, they support muslim radicals – the people known as jihadists – and they support and present materials that are on the left fringes of politics.

            You are going to have to find some place else to make up your lies for this audience here.

            You can consider your lies busted.

          • BentGhazi

            The WMD programs of the Iraq government of Saddam are proven fact. He used them on Iran, he used them on his own people – the Kurds – between the wars. How you can continue to make that claim despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary is amazing – and appalling.

            You really know less and less with every passing comment. Maybe you should invest in ear plugs and a gag – something is leaking from your cranium.

      • Anonymous

        Show some respect.
        And what did he do that was so terrible, besides being black? Get the economy on track faster than anyone else could have? Disagree with him, but stop acting like a child.

        • Anonymous

          Funny! respect is something you have to earn. it’s not only off track, it’s off the freakin wheels, and you know it so, know it some.

          • Anonymous

            Was that an answer to the question, of do you just have a crush on me?

        • Anonymous

          Get the economy on track faster?  Get the economy on track faster!?  Actually look at the economy, will you, nincompoop, lol.  The economy HAS YET to even be on track.  Companies are STILL suffering huge income shortfalls.  The unemployment rate is STILL high.  MILLIONS of people are STILL unemployed and underemployed.  People are STILL being laid off.  Take an actual look at the economy, please, and quit being such a blind, ignorant maroon.

          • Anonymous

            Wrong. Auto companies are profitable, banks, insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, everything. The stock market is up. Unemployment is still high, but that always lags other factors. And the do nothing congress playing games with the fiscal cliff and debt ceiling is the only thing slowing us down.

          • Anonymous

            Nope, wrong. Auto companies are not AS profitable as they once were. Banks most certainly are NOT as profitable as they once were. Look at all the banks that went bankrupt, for crying out loud. Heck, Bank of America still has a long climb ahead. And insurance companies and pharmaceuticals? You CANNOT be serious. Take a look at the stock market again without being a TOTAL idiot please, lol. It most certainly is NOT what you claim it to be.

          • Anonymous

            Never said they were the most profitable ever, I said they were more so than when Obama took office. Fact. Bush destroyed the economy and the great President Obama is bringing it back. You can thank him later.

          • Anonymous

            LOL NO. Try again. Most companies are actually making LESS than when Obama first took office. In fact, many have actually gone bankrupt and are STILL in bankruptcy now. Man, your lies just keep on coming, don’t they.

          • Anonymous

            Insurance companies, banks, and automakers were going bankrupt and are now profitable. Are you A) fucking insane
            B) willfully stupid or
            C) an angry amnesiac?

            There is no other choice.

          • Anonymous

            Try again. They are STILL going bankrupt. So, I ask the same of you. Are you
            A) Fucking insane
            B) Willfully stupid or
            C) An angry amnesiac

            Seriously, how stupid are you if you actually think insurance companies, banks, and automakers actually are more profitable now than they were when Obama took office. TAKE AN ACTUAL LOOK AT THEM PLEASE. It is quite clear you haven’t lol.

          • BentGhazi

            Says Mister Know-nothing.

          • BentGhazi

            And by what authority do you pose your question? Apparently you are ignorant of the manipulation by the government taking place in all of these industries.

            They are all subsidized by your buddy, pResident Evil and his gang of Chicago politi-thugs.

            You qualify under a, b, and c.

          • BentGhazi

            I would wager that the auto makers have a different story than the fairy tales you are spinning here. There is nothing great about pResident Evil, except his egomania.

          • BentGhazi

            Man, with every comment you appear to lose credibility and knowledge at an alarming rate. You believe all the lies and manipulations of this administration, yet reject all that came before.

            Your ignorance of fact and reality is absolutely amazing – are you a consumer of psychoactive intoxicants?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1000509007 Valli Saliba

        My best friend hasn’t watched the news yet because she can’t stand the sight of him. I know lots of people (me and my husband included) who just turn the channel when that guy comes on. You just can’t stand to look at or listen to him.  Everything he says is lies. He’s just a sorry excuse for any kind of leader. And I’d liike to know what he needs a vacation from. Lord, I hope he ends up being impeached.

        • Anonymous

          Yeah, I hated when Obama lied about Iraq having WMDs so that we would go to war.

          • Anonymous

             in 2008 he pulled a reverse michael jackson, that’s why most people don’t remember it

          • Anonymous

            Huh?

          • Anonymous

            you’re joke about obama lying about wmds. I took it further, bush was white obama is black (well halfican), jackson went from black to white, in 2008 obama took over. a little convoluted and a bit of leap but i think the premise for my joke had real potential

          • Anonymous

            Except, your idiotic joke falls TOTALLY flat when it is a DOCUMENTED fact that Bush NEVER ONCE lied about Iraq have WMDs.  The real joke is all the idiotic libtards who still insist that Bush lied about Iraq when literally EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENTED FACT ON THE ENTIRE GLOBE proves BEYOND ALL DOUBT that Bush did NOT lie at all, lol.  Heck, even most mainstream liberal sources, including their lords over at MSNBC, have given up on that attack in the face of ALL the documented evidence that Bush did NOT lie at all.

          • Anonymous

            Lol. So where are the WMDs?

            Of course he lied. He said they definitely had them and he didn’t.

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, no. Try again buddy. He definitely did NOT say they definitely had them. NO ONE said they definitely had them, lol.

          • Anonymous

            Of course he claimed Iraq had WMDs, that was the excuse he used to go to war. He even claimed he had proof, the stinking liar.

          • Anonymous

            And there was proof, lol. Not manufactured by him either. So try again, liar.

          • BentGhazi

            That is an old horse your kind keeps trotting out, and it is a lie as it was when it first started appearing in the left wing media.

            The reason we went to war was Saddam and the threat he posed to friendly nations in the region. It was even sanctioned by the United Nations – look it up knownothing.

          • Anonymous
          • BentGhazi

            Your source – fektubeaccount – is very anti-america and pro terrorist. They support Chavez, they support muslim radicals – the people known as jihadists – and they support and present materials that are on the left fringes of world politics.
            You are going to have to find some place else to make up your lies for this audience here.
            You can consider your lies busted.

          • BentGhazi

            They did have them. They used them. It’s a matter of record, and the UN was the body that made it so. Read some non-liberal biased documents – and pay attention to reality once in a while.

            You must be the most ignorant lefty to have ever trod here.

    • Anonymous

      Certainly not as childish as the main stream media.  Every watch CNN and MSNBC lately?  They are as childish as one can get.  Beck is talking like actual GROWN UPS talk, lol.  What?  You have difficulty understanding actual adults?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ted-Pendlebury/1662070892 Ted Pendlebury

    If only ALL media would do the same…

    • Anonymous

      Yeah. Mainstream media acting all grown up and whatnot. Pathetic. They should all act like children!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/H24HGK3LIFS6H54B6BXB36J2S4 Eve

    I call some one high up in  DC  (that guy )

  • http://www.facebook.com/john.dosch John Dosch

    This is a new year’s resolution that won’t last long.That GUY will totally push Glen’s buttons this year.

  • Anonymous

    Pretty soon Glenn and Stu will be bonking each other on the head with spring sound effects going off. 

    That would actually make them easier to take seriously. 

    • Anonymous

      True.  I have to turn them off.  Liken them to a conservative Chris Matthews.  Immature, childish, condescending and ridiculing.  I turn the Blaze radio back on at 1:00 ct when Jay Sevrin show starts

  • Robert McMillan

    I give it three days, either his head will explode or he will say that guys name

  • http://twitter.com/queenieslk Wanda Galloway

    Yikes….isn’t “that guy” sorta his bread & butter?

    I like it!  Go Glenn!  Let’s stop giving “that guy” so much attention!  ;p

  • http://twitter.com/LilBlkDressVint Patricia Myers

    Just wondering, can they say “that guy” instead? 

  • http://www.facebook.com/leadbeaterllc Robert Leadbeater

    The other day I couldn’t remember the name of a certain pernicious Fellow when I looked at my conversation mates and said, “Spooky Dude”! Everyone know about whom I was speaking…It’s all right to mention the “Boy King”. Glen, it’s “Oz” that noone is supposed to draw the curtain!

    • Anonymous

      Wow, hoe many racist allusions can you fit into one post? Gotta be some kind of record.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, if it were only so easy to remove “that guy” from our lives by never mentioning his name or looking at him again.  I try really hard not to have to look at him and his wife, but they are everywhere like the dictator’s pictures are in communist countries. That guy is still campaigning rather than acting as a president.  It’s going to be a long four years.

    • Anonymous

      Lol, yeah all over buildings in the US they’ve painted his picture, 5 stories high. Everywhere.

      Do you people have any relationship with reality at all?..

  • http://twitter.com/conard3 David Conard

    I predict massive sales of “duct tape” and mops this year.

    • Anonymous

      What does that mean?

  • John Achenbach

    Just refer to him as I do – I call him the Antichrist.

    • Anonymous

      Lol. That just evinces ignorance of religion AND politics. Nice work, patriot.

  • http://www.facebook.com/glenn.padmos Glenn Padmos

    What guy? :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/jmellon59 Jim Mellon

    I don’t look at “that guy” on tv. And I haven’t for over three years. If I can’t change the channel, I avert my eyes or turn away entirely. Although I see right through his agenda, I will not make eye contact with “that guy” (even if it’s on tv)

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/PCYKP4ZWJKSNXOLX5CKWEV4ZRE rnk

       Jim-I agree with you-I will not look at him-you see “that guy” for what he is.

      • Anonymous

        A black man?

    • Anonymous

      Why, because you can’t think of actual policy differences? You sound like a child. You won’t make eye contact with him EVEN ON TV???
      Do you realize how puerile that sounds?
      Wow.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000303879569 Nanette Gray

    Yep that guy is an evil person, with all that guy’s so called “taxes” that do not effect the middle class, right! That guy is a puppet and that guy is paving the way for The Antichrist” and we all know that guy is Godless!

    • Anonymous

      Godless??? I thought he was Muslim! Get it together, people!

  • Anonymous

    I don’t find the idea childish at all . . . but it is a pretty sad day in America when the president’s name is so often spoken of, or thought of, with a hiss.  Rather to censor his name than to subject the office of POTUS to such contempt.

    • Anonymous

      Good plan. Instead of showing respect, act like a 6 year old and refuse to say his name.

      I’m sure that’s how we’re going to fix our problems.

  • http://www.facebook.com/michelle.gollrad Michelle Gollrad

    THAT GUY…………….MY NEW CUSS WORD

  • http://youtu.be/ff8jDkOHp3U Sam Fisher

    I call him that idiot. 

    • Anonymous

      Wow, you must be Einstein if you think that the former editor of the Harvard Law Review is an idiot.

      Again, articulate policy disagreements if you’re able. Name calling is immature and silly.

      • http://youtu.be/ff8jDkOHp3U Sam Fisher

        What type of moronic world you live in. He thinks there are 57 States that higher gas prices are a good thing, he even thinks he can see dead people, thinks that when the U.K. National anthem is playing is a good idea for speech time and gave Joe Biden an important job and you voted for the idiot so what does that make you?

        • Anonymous

          Come on now, you don’t honestly believe that he thinks there are 57 states, do you? That is absurd. He mispoke. He was tired from campaigning, meant 57 trips, and mispoke.
          He doesn’t think higher gas prices are a good thing, and he realizes that Presidents don’t have that much control over gas prices, as conservatives maintained when they were high during the Bush administration.
          He thinks he can see dead people? You’ll have to ‘splain that one.
          Something about the UK national anthem? Some crack about Biden?

          Honestly, this is juvenile, piddly stuff. Is there any actual policy of Obama’s that you disagree with for a substantive reason?

          I havent’ seen one intelligent, substantive criticism of Obama’s policies on this entire site. There are just loonies going on about messiahs and commies and sharia law.

          Wow.

          “you voted for [Obama] so what does that make you?”
          Part of the majority.

          • Sandie

            Not much of a majority. Only 58.9 % of eligible voters turned out for 2012. Obama got only 51% of them or 30% of the eligible vote. So, where he got 65,899,660 votes, there were 153,340,860 eligible voters who did not vote for him.

          • Anonymous

            He got more votes than any other president in history.

          • Sandie

            So what – it doesn’t change the facts I gave.  It means nothing as it is an illogical comparison. He did not get the greatest percentage of votes – the only proper comparison. Can you figure out why? No – well, I’ll tell you.  The population increases considerably from election to election. Can you see the fault in your logic now? As the voting public increases by the many millions each year, a president would be expected to get a larger number of votes than  a previous president.  Obama got less this year than in 2008. Guess a lot of people didn’t get the ‘change’ they ‘hoped’ for.

          • Anonymous

            sandie: so what? your facts evince nothing.

          • Sandie

            They do to people with more than a few brain cells. LMAO! Awwww, you just don’t like it. Your so called majority is a minority of the population. LMAO!

          • Anonymous

            So what? So was every president. Is there a point?

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            Hey, you’re the one who is making a big bragging deal about it. LOL. So what was your point? I just shot it down, whatever it was. LMAO!

          • Anonymous

            You brung it up, not me. But yay you. Give yourself a cookie.

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            Not. You need to review your posts. You make a claim, get refuted, can’t back it up so you wiggle around it by sidestepping with another claim, blow it again and then make silly comments about what’s the point. You are dancing in a circle. You don’t get a cookie. Go to bed.

          • BentGhazi

            You dissed this putz beee-utifully!

          • http://youtu.be/ff8jDkOHp3U Sam Fisher

            First Obama saying 57 states and not looking tried.
            http://youtu.be/4u3PteRPLys
            Obama during the second debate talking about gas prices and showing to the world that he don’t understand how the basic economics works. I guess according to Obama the Clinton years must have been hell on earth for the economy.
            http://youtu.be/IHibMuG7-Ag
            Obama claims he see dead people in this video.
            http://youtu.be/Sh6Gx1KrvTw
            And here is that racist Biden talking about black people and Indians.
            http://youtu.be/Ll_goH-aivU
            http://youtu.be/EgIFV7jXBFQ
            And he means what he says in those quotes.
            http://youtu.be/nz4_T9aA5eE
            So that means you voted for the moron dream team and that makes you a racist moron and the people who can out to vote is only 30% of the country hardly the majority moron who failed at math.

          • Anonymous

            lol. you want to have a youtube-off comparing those to the things that Bush said? It wouldn’t even be close. But what’s the point? Nobody is stupid, except people who think you can be stupid and be elected President.

            But that’s nice debating, calling people a moron every other word. Great citizenship. It’s shocking that the country is in such bad shape with good citizens like you debating policy issues.

          • http://youtu.be/XEjnyMyJYTI Sam Fisher

            Don’t waste your time Bush was just as bad.

          • Anonymous

            “Don’t waste your time Bush was just as bad.”

            Then what’s the point, unless you’re just hating on all Presidents. People misspeak. That’s not an issue. There are enough real issues to attend to.

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, for one, he said 57 states, lol, not 57 trips.

            Doesn’t think higher gas prices are a good thing, huh?  His own words beg to differ, lol.  He said, and I quote, “Under my plan, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”  Now, where do you think that gas goes to?  That’s him stating loud and clear for the entire world to hear that he actually WANTED and was PUSHING for an increase in gas prices.

            As for the TOTAL disrespect he gave the UK.  Don’t tell me you are so ignorant that you completely ignored the video where he started to give a toast when the UK started to play their National Anthem?  The video went viral, for crying out loud.  Where’s the rock you’re living under, lol?

            As for Obama’s policies, his policies, my dimwitted idiot, are juvenile and prove what kind of a lunatic Obama really is.  Obamacare will NOT work.  It will actually make healthcare in this country MORE expensive, not less.  It has already started doing so, lol, because more companies are being forced to pay MORE in healthcare costs already.  It will also make healthcare LESS efficient because NOTHING run by the government can be efficient, lol.  As for raising taxes to raise revenue, that does NOT actually work in the real world.  Raising taxes will actually reduce revenue, while lowering taxes will actually increase revenue, as has been proven in the past EVERY SINGLE time such policies have been implemented.  It’s called ACTUAL DOCUMENTED HISTORY proving that Obama’s policies simply CANNOT and will NOT work in the real world where we, actual grown ups mind you, live.

          • Anonymous

            He misspoke. bfd. That’s not a lie, moron.
            The UK loves him.
            Every expert says Obamacare reduces costs. No question. You’re lying, again.
            You’re grasping at irrelevant straws, angrily hating over half the country, while the test of us move on. Maybe you’d be better off somewhere else. All this anger isn’t good for you.

          • Anonymous

            Nope. Try again, lol. Your lie is a lie ignoramus.

            The UK loves him? Yeah, sure they love him. They also love a highly inefficient health care system that many of their own citizens says does really work, lol. He totally disrespected them by starting a toast when they started to play their national anthem. What do you think the reaction would be if the Queen did that here when we started our own National Anthem.

            As for your outright lie about every expert saying Obamacare reduces costs, it is just that, an outright lie, lol. NO expert, NONE WHATSOEVER, has ever once said that Obamacare reduces costs. In fact, just about EVERY SINGLE expert has GONE ON RECORD stating emphatically that Obamacare will do NOTHING but increase costs. Heck, it has already begun to do so. Companies are ALREADY paying increased healthcare costs for their employees. Pharmaceutical companies have ALREADY started paying more production costs for their drugs related directly to Obamacare regulation. The same goes for insurance companies. Of course, you’d see that too if you actually paid attention to the experts, lol, but you don’t. You’re just an ignorant buffoon.

            And no. At most, I’m hating the 21% of the country who actually voted for Obama. Only in a mind as irrational as yours is 21% over half the country, lol. Try again, nut job.

          • Anonymous

            Obamacare reduces costs. Fact. Here’s proof of another lie of yours. There’s dozens others if you learn how to use google. http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/obamacare-reduces-costs-provides-better-care/article_315dac7d-9441-5a8b-85c3-486e2964a54b.html

          • Anonymous

            Seriously, you really are stupid. Obamacare reduces costs? Sorry, son, but that is NOT a fact. That is NOTHING but a lie. Healthcare costs have ALREADY STARTED GOING UP strictly BECAUSE OF healthcare. Seriously, you are both blind and stupid, lol.

          • Anonymous

            Actually, they’ve already gone down for many people, and many who couldn’t get insurance before can now.
            Listen, it’s been fun kicking your ass, but I gotta run. Do a little reading and learn the truth. Here’s a clue, beck and rush and fox aren’t legitimate news sources, however entertaining they can be.

          • Anonymous

            Actually, no. They’ve gone UP for many people. Try again. That lie doesn’t work.

            Also, many of those people who couldn’t get insurance before simply didn’t even try to get insurance before because they actually did NOT even want insurance before. Of course, you are too stupid to realize that. Not everyone actually wants that health insurance idiot.

            You may think you’ve been kicking my ass, but since I was the one who pointed out YOUR slanderous lies here, seems I was the one doing the ass kicking.

            Yup, if YOU do a little reading, like what the Obamacare law actually does, like how companies have REALLY performed the last few years, you certainly will learn the truth. Do some reading. Wise up, and learn the truth. It is obvious the lights aren’t on upstairs for you, lol.

            As for Beck and Fox not being legitimate news sources, try again, idiot. They have been proven by SEVERAL independent sources to be the MOST legitimate news sources. As for Rush, why even include him. He’s just a talk show host with opinions. He doesn’t even claim to be legitimate news. He only uses legitimate news to show just how stupid you idiots on the left really are, lol.

          • BentGhazi

            Insurance policy rates have gone up for more people than have gone down – among those who pay for their insurance. The only people who have affordable care under pResident Evil Care were not paying for it to begin with, and some of those, (senior citizens and the disabled), actually have to MORE for some kinds of policies – namely the Medicare supplemental policies that are required by the SSA for a person to obtain ANY level of health care. You are good at spreading myths and the lies of this administration, but those of us living it know better.

            The only ass you have kicked here has been your own. What a remarkable amount of knee and hip flexibility you have displayed.

            Here’s a clue for you – lots of people here DO read, and have been reading for longer than you’ve been walking, and your ignorant, condescending propagandizing isn’t well received here. Not everyone here agrees with Beck, Rush and Fox, but they do have a better track record for reporting and commenting on the truth than any of the other major news reporting organizations do today.

            I’m no one’s cheerleader, I just know from experience when I am being lied to. The MSM has been lying to people for many years, and you sir are no different.

          • BentGhazi

            Family members have told me all their coverages have either gone up or have been eliminated by this “plan” and this has been verified by nearly everyone I have talked to on this subject, so either everyone is fabricating the same story, or the “plan” is full of obfuscative lies, as are those who support it. It is also curious that NO Seniors or disabled persons speak up for this program – NONE. Why? Because they are the ones who are being discriminated against to get FREE coverage for young, healthy individuals who historically don’t pay for health insurance and don’t go to doctors unless they land in the emergency room.

            This is a numbers game pure and simple – the more people forced to pay for healthcare, the more money in the system. What is happening to that money? No one is telling you that. Why did they have to hide the truth under passing this law by force, under the cover of two o’clock in the morning votes, and immediately signing it before anyone had any real chance to review the 1,600 pages of obstructive language designed to hide the truth. Nothing has been clear in any of this law, and we find out more negative impact stuff every day until this is fully implemented.

            This isn’t helping anyone. A good portion of it is meant to restrict care, not deliver it to those who need it most. Rates have skyrocketed, not decreased, and no one is reporting it except the people who have been paying the bills.

            It’s bad policy, done in the dark, and every day the thing smells more rotten. If this was a person’s leg, the gangrenous infection would have caused amputation long ago, but progressives continue to lie about it, the smell, the black discoloration of necrosis, and tell us it will get better. The patient does not see it that way, but Doctor Obamacare assures the patient that it is getting better every day. I wonder if they will be singing the same song at the patient’s graveside?

          • BentGhazi

            Let the UK have him! We parted from the UK in 1776, and they exist now because we went in and saved them in two world wars.

            You are irrelevant, straw man.

          • BentGhazi

            People paying the bills know better than the experts. Costs have gone up since this law started. They will continue to go up – it’s in the law.

            Try to read it sometime – for a guy claiming to know, you sure are ignorant. Must be the hubris of youth.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000303879569 Nanette Gray

    I have never and will never give that guy the title of his position..because that guy does not deserve it nor has he been honest in anything at all!

    • Anonymous

      What has Obama lied about? Also, did bush ever lie?

      • Anonymous

        come on! quit covering for your manchild. He is a liar liar pants on fire, and you , know it so, know it some.

        • Anonymous

          And yet you can’t come up with anything specific.
          You sound like a child.

      • Anonymous

        What has Obama lied about?  You cannot be serious.  During his bid for Presidency in 2008, he spoke of a transparent and OPEN Presidency.  Yet, what does he do?  He hides his birth certificate for years and literally SHUTS EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN out of certain closed door meetings.  That’s one lie straight off the bat, lol.  Than there is Obamacare which is one big lie after another.  Than there’s his promise to reduce the deficit and the debt, but that isn’t going to happen at all.  In fact, our national debt, according to the most modest of estimates, will be AT LEAST $22 trillion.  This means that he will have added more to the national debt than EVERY SINGLE President before him COMBINED.  Are these lies not enough for your idiotic mind, or should I include some more of Obama’s whoppers for you?  As for Bush’s lies, that’s not for me to say here.  However, there is YOUR outright and DISPROVEN lie that Bush lied about Iraq having WMDs.  Bush did NOT actually lie about Iraq having WMDs.  That was NOT Bush’s lie, moron.  You need to look elsewhere for that because EVERY SINGLE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT ON PLANET EARTH, including China, Russia, France, Germany, Italy, England, Spain, even Canada of all places, ALL agreed that Iraq had WMDs.  That’s NOT Bush’s lie, ignorant buffoon, so quit spreading your idiotic hypocrisy.

        • Anonymous

          Breaking a promise is. It the same thing as a lie.

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, a lie is a lie is a lie. It looks like a lie. It smells like a lie. In the end, it IS a lie, lol.

          • Anonymous

            No genius, a lie is saying something untrue. A broken promise is when you say you’ll do something but you don’t. Not the same thing. Did you miss that day in first grade?

          • Anonymous

            Apparently, you missed that day, lol. A lie is a lie is a lie. It looked like a lie. It smelled like a lie. In the end, it became a lie.

          • Anonymous

            Bush lied, correct. Is that your apology?

          • Anonymous

            Uhm, no. Bush did NOT lie. Why should I apologize? YOU are the one lying, lol. So try again, LIAR.

          • BentGhazi

            Promising and not following through is a lie. Only a liar would try to make the case you are attempting. That’s the truth.

          • BentGhazi

            “Breaking a promise is. It the same thing as a lie.”

            Now you admit what Army has been telling you, and what you have been denying. In your own words, we have you stating breaking promises is not lying. Here, we have you stating, “Breaking a promise is. It the same thing as a lie.”, which is exactly what Army has been telling you.

            Great job of putting it together. Maybe the scales will one day be removed from your eyes – hopefully before you develop cataracts.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AZKS2TGSUKVBVT4KNQASWVAAFA yankee fan

    I think that this President  will get a 3rd term by appointing socialist or marxists supreme court justices . Probably 2 will be replaced. Then he will put sharia law in the country. I see this happening. Am I really insane for thinking this. Please help good people. We need heroes now more than ever as America is fading fast. I agree with GB why did they pass this garbage bill. Might as well go down now and peeps get a wake up call to what is going on and stop watching crap on tv..What scares me and a reality I see a bloody revolution in our future. Hope Im not reading conspiracy theories. Im going of what I see logically as it can happen. We need God, and the Messiahs to come if ever our planet is to survive..

    • Anonymous

      Ooh you figured it out! He’ll appoint communists, and somehow that means he’ll have a third term, even though that’s unconstitutional and the court can’t change the constitution. Then he’ll institute sharia law, even though he’s not Muslim, and that kind of legislation falls under state laws not federal laws.
      How many messiahs are coming, btw?
      No, no conspiracy theory there. You figured it out.

    • Anonymous

      What scares ME is whack jobs like you starting to talk about bloody revolution. 

  • Anonymous

    Glenn used that guy’s name this morning between 9:30 and 9:45 est and not as ObamaCare or one of the derivatives that were agreed upon. He was giving Stu a hard time and out it slipped. Glenn, pay up, it happened this morning!

  • Anonymous

    This is what I like most about Glenn’s email news ::::::: Obama’s picture is not posted, Thank You so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    You do not have to mention this SOBs name to know who we are talking about

    • Anonymous

      Limbaugh, right?

  • Anonymous

    How about some respect for the office? If you don’t like him, rally your friends to vote him (and his party) out next time. Until then, showing disrespect for the presidency is anti-American. 

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/DPO6IXM2FQPIWXLQYLNBGH6SOY The Hooks

      Of course if you don’t like him your considered disrespectful.  But when liberals called for the death of President George W. Bush where were you?

      • Anonymous

        Dislike him and disagree with him all you want. Refusing to say his name is just infantile.

        And I don’t know who threatened him, but I’m pretty sure that would be illegal.

      • Anonymous

        I was with the rest of the conservatives telling liberals they should at least respect the office. I don’t like Obama, and I did my part to get him out of office. Unfortunately, it wasn’t enough. But now it’s time to respect the presidency so that we are portraying a united front to the rest of the world. I might not prefer Obama as president, but I prefer him to any other country’s leader. 

        Like him or not, Obama is an American, he is our president, and he is a person. All three of those things qualify him for respect, even if his political positions do not. 

    • Anonymous

      No one shows more disrespect for the presidency than “that guy” and his evil minions!

      • Anonymous

        How so?

        • Anonymous

          Because he’s a commie sympathising socialist in a “constitutional” republic. Given the particulars of The Constitution of the United States of America and The Bill of Rights, he [that guy] has violated his oath of office. If the legislative branch had any balls and wasn’t almost as corrupt he would be impeached and prosecuted. Yes, it’s that serious. I don’t hold out any hope for this, as we’re way to far gone. Besides, that guy is the symptom of the real problem, not the problem in and of itself! Enough said?

          • Anonymous

            No. Can you be specific? Name a couple particulars of the Constitution that he has violated. Please.

          • Anonymous

             The Constitution says that no person shall be deprived
             of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be
            taken for public use, without just compensation.
            This pretty much rules out any form of social engineering in the form of redistribution of wealth on the part of the government. But I guess if just about all the government is guilty and they do it to everybody nobody will do anything. Like I said it’s gone to far for most people to accept this.  Every socialist violates the spirit of the constitution by through the laws they pass. Then there’s the abortion issue which needs no explanation [except to morally bankrupt idiots]. 

          • Sandie

            Obamacare is definitely a socialist act

          • Anonymous

            Right on. Socialist policies violate the Constitution. Q.E.D., “that guy” has violated his oath of office! 

          • Anonymous

            @ jwilco:
            In that case, it’s not just Obama or “socialists”, its every president and congressperson ever.
            Every law limits somebody’s rights to protect someone else’s. You don’t have the right to kill someone else; this infringes on your freedom. Do you oppose murder laws?

            And abortion? You’re going to force women to bear children and you have the nerve to talk about freedom?

          • Anonymous

            You don’t have the right [freedom] to “kill someone else” is exactly my point. A baby is another life and no one is forcing women to bear children unless of course they are pregnant at which time they are responsible for that life the same as any other parent of any aged child. Not being allowed to justifiably kill someone else does not impinge on my freedom because I never have a right [freedom] to do that. Freedom and rights must always be analysed according to the ethics of God.  Perhaps you are one of those morally bankrupt people I was talking about; especially if you don’t see the disharmony between your first paragraph and your second.

          • Anonymous

            “Freedom and rights must always be analysed according to the ethics of God”

            What about freedom to practice religion? You simply don’t have the right to impose your religious beliefs on other Americans. If you think abortion is wrong, don’t have one. But you can’t force others to behave according to your religious beliefs.
            There’s a reason it’s the first amendment. Other freedoms don’t mean much if you can impose your religion on others.

          • Anonymous

             I totally agree but these people actually believe that life starts at conception and that an abortion is murder. Even without religion behind it, they think people are killing babies in droves. I disagree but I see their logic. The point to be made is that, to protect the “baby” we must have control over the woman’s body and we simply should not have that power.

          • Anonymous

            ” I totally agree but these people actually believe that life starts at conception and that an abortion is murder. Even without religion behind it, they think people are killing babies in droves. I disagree but I see their logic. The point to be made is that, to protect the “baby” we must have control over the woman’s body and we simply should not have that power.”

            I do understand that.
            My point is that their belief is a RELIGIOUS one, and they simply don’t have the right to impose those beliefs on others. Not in this country.

            I’m vegetarian, and I know that eating meat is bad for individuals, countries, and the planet. And I can speak about that as much as I like. But if I tried to force everyone to stop eating meat, that would be wrong.

  • http://www.facebook.com/robyn.headley1 Robyn Headley

    Beck bites

    • greywolfrs

      And you swallow.

  • Anonymous

    Show some respect.
    And what did he do that was so terrible, besides being black? Get the economy on track faster than anyone else could have? Disagree with him, but stop acting like a child.

  • Anonymous

    “Dingleberrycare”??? ROFLMBO!!!! I love it Jeffy. (y)

  • greywolfrs

    OK, enough of this, stop with the pouting about losing the election. There was no way Romney was going to beat OBAMAO. Unfortunately, he chose not to bring up things like Fast and Furious, Benghazi or any of OBAMAO’s other failings. He chose to run a campaign that would never ring true with enough of the population to win. Crying about this will not change it. It’s time to pick yourselves up, dust yourselves off and continue to fight the good fight. They may have won a battle, but that does not make the war. It’s time to figure out where Conservatives go from here. It’s time to come up with a plan of action. I listened to all the nothing stories you guys have put out since the election, but enough is enough. I do not really care about Santa stuck in the rafters or any of those other “nothing” stories.

    Here’s where we go from here:

    Conservtives are in the unique position of having a ready made party to shift to, unlike Democraps. We have the Libertarian party. You know, that party that believes in personal responsibility and small government. The party that has been preaching following the Constitution, from day one. The party that most of the Founders would be a member of today.

    It’s time for Conservatives to realize that the Republican party has sold them out. They do not represent our beliefs. They are not for personal responsibility or FREEDOM. Boner and Cantor just sold Conservatives out, AGAIN, by voting for this “fiscal cliff” deal. That bill got no cuts and gave OBAMAO/Democraps exactly what they wanted, higher taxes. Boner has already said that OBAMAOcare is the law of the land and sold out Conservatives on that issue also. He has the ability to defund it and is going to do nothing. Boner and Republicans helped the Democraps pass the NDAA and have helped to extend illegal wiretaps. How much more proof do Conservatives need? When is it enough? When are Republicans and Conservatives going to wake up and realize this? When are Republicans and Conservatives going to realize that guys like Boner, McConnell and Cantor are part of the “ruling elite?” If OBAMAO gets his way, they will part of it.

    Conservatives have a choice to make, choose wisely.

    • Anonymous

      Good point. The Republican Party sold out conservatives. You have no choice but to become Libertarian. Good luck with that

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1507201229 Cyndy Drain

    Yes, you really sound God-like./sarc  My goodness, has EVERYONE GONE MAD!!  I worked and voted in this country for almost 45 years now and NEVER did I realize how deranged and hateful so many people are.  You people are the scary ones.  Glen is laughing all the way to the bank at how he’s managed to brainwash so many Americans.  I guarantee you he’d not be welcome in ANY OTHER COUNTRY on this planet spewing this type of hateful vitriol nor would ANYONE ANYWHERE be fooled by him.  At the absolute irony of it all is that this type of hate-speak is done with a backdrop called christianity!  WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1507201229 Cyndy Drain

    Oh I’m sure God would approve of THAT/sarc.

  • Anonymous

    I refer to him as B.O.  I am concerned the way we use his name as though it’s a noun, not a person’s name. 

    • Anonymous

      A person’s name IS a noun. Don’t know how you’re using his name, but I use it as a name.

  • Anonymous

    Come on now, you don’t honestly believe that he thinks there are 57 states, do you? That is absurd. He mispoke. He was tired from campaigning, meant 57 trips, and mispoke.
    He doesn’t think higher gas prices are a good thing, and he realizes that Presidents don’t have that much control over gas prices, as conservatives maintained when they were high during the Bush administration.
    He thinks he can see dead people? You’ll have to ‘splain that one.
    Something about the UK national anthem? Some crack about Biden?

    Honestly, this is juvenile, piddly stuff. Is there any actual policy of Obama’s that you disagree with for a substantive reason?

    I havent’ seen one intelligent, substantive criticism of Obama’s policies on this entire site. There are just loonies going on about messiahs and commies and sharia law.

    Wow.

    “you voted for [Obama] so what does that make you?”
    Part of the majority.

    • Anonymous

      You ever hear of the Kyoto protocol? One of the major planks is making hydrocarbon fuel less affordable. In regards to his policies on the of use of coal “that guy”  said energy rates would necessarily skyrocket. He crippled drilling in the Gulf, the Arctic and is against fracking and the Keystone pipeline. While helping subsidize offshore drilling by our competitors. You sound bitchy and naive as hell! 

      • Anonymous

        That’s an international agreement and I think it was never ratified. But yea! An actual issue.
        Frakking is unbelievably bad for the environment, and we’ve got to deal with global warming. That’s not anyone being stupid, that’s a policy disagreement.

        • Anonymous

          But liberals such as yourself and that guy believe that the Kyoto Protocol was an expedient move. You were disputing the argument that he is for higher gas prices when that is part of the Kyoto platform. There is no proof that fracking is bad for the environment. Dealing with global warming in the way “that guy” does it is not only stupid but hypocritical. On every issue “that guy” is destroying US industry.

          • Anonymous

            He saved the auto industry. Conservatives opposed helping them. He’s not for higher gas prices, and they may not go up under Kyoto anyway. In any case Kyoto is dead. Personally, I don’t think it went far enough.
            And yeah, frakking sucks, it’s clear. It’s not worth sacrificing our drinking water supplies.

          • Anonymous

            you cannot prove that because he prevented the bankruptcy of General motors that he saved the auto industry. If people want automobiles and there is money in building them the auto industry will survive even if some companies go under and are either bought out or their tooling is appropriated by someone else who wants to build autos. There is absolutely no proof he saved the industry; he subsidised GM. It is unknown as to whether their demise would be a good thing or not. Companies that are run poorly or insolvent should be allowed to go away. Someone else will step up.
            I have just given evidence that he is for higher energy prices as that will ensure a more earnest search for green energy [so called]. All you do is claim that he is not! Provide proof. If he says he isn’t for high energy prices then he may only be stupid, as he doesn’t understand cause and effect. All his policies will ensure that prices will go up. Kyoto may be dead but the people who are for it and things like agenda 21 are not. They are alive and well and in office.
            Fracking is safe for drinking water as the oil is thousands of feet below the domestic water supply. It is brought to the surface via sealed steel casing. You have only liberal talking points. Are you a college student?

          • Anonymous

            “you cannot prove that because he prevented the bankruptcy of General motors that he saved the auto industry. ”

            But you can prove frakking is safe?

            He saved thousands of jobs. If GM blew up, you think a startup new auto company would smoothly take over? Please.

          • Sandie

            Guess again. Did he bail out Ford? No. Can you name all the auto makers in the US? And which of them got bailouts  ( mostly for the UAW and their pensions).

            The Conservatives favored a managed bankruptcy, which would have been a restructuring, not no help at all. You need to get a few facts straight.

      • Sandie

        Not only did he impede drilling, permitting etc; where independent private wells actually increased production, he tried to take credit for it! Their Dear Leader is not just deceptive, he has proven repeatedly that he is an outright liar!

        • Anonymous

          Makes you wonder why they fall at his feet in awe and worship. Maybe it’s just because they voted for him. Sheeesh!

          • Anonymous

            Nobody worships him. But he is the best president since Clinton!!!! Maybe even better!!!! 

            And that’s the opinion of everyone in the world, and is supported by facts. Republican presidents have done nothing but create deficits. Every single one.

          • Anonymous

            That’s a lie pure and simple. I personallyh know a hundred people who diddn’t vote for him. I know of millions more. So have Democraps. Presidents don’t create defdicits on their own dipstick.

          • Anonymous

            I never said he won 100% of the vote.

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Anonymous

            No, you said, “Nobody worships him. But he is the best president since Clinton!!!! Maybe even better!!!!

            And that’s the opinion of everyone in the world, and is supported by facts.” I guess a lot of people who thought he was best voted for Mitt.

          • Sandie

             “But he is the best president since Clinton!!!! Maybe even better!!!! ” That is only your opinion.
            .
            “And that’s the opinion of everyone in the world, and is supported by facts.” oh really? It wasn’t the opinion of millions who voted against him… and since you claim it is supported by hacts – prove it link to all these ‘facts’.
            .
            “Republican presidents have done nothing but create deficits. Every single one.” again – prove it.
            .
            See, Knownothing, you can’t come on here making false claims and not expect to be called on it.

          • Anonymous

            Obviously it wasn’t unanimous. It never is. But Obama kicked butt.

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            Then don’t make fraudulent statements.

            Obama didn’t kick but, he kissed butt and lied his way back in. Winning with only 50.3% of the vote is nothing to brag about.

          • Anonymous

            I was speaking of the electoral college. Yes he did kick butt there.

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            Don’t lie and try to wiggle your way out of it. Sorry to bust your bubble, but you missed again.

            Incidentally, you never mentioned electoral college. Matter of fact he lost votes there from his previous election, went from 365 down to 332. He didn’t get the most there either, that was Reagan with 525. FDR had 523 and even Nixon got 520. Sorry kid, you lose.

          • Anonymous

            I said the election. That’s how it’s determined. And I didn’t say he kicked FDR’s butt. He didn’t run against that great liberal American.
            As for percentage, Romney got 47%. Ironic, huh?

          • Sandie

            Liar, trying to change the subject. You said he got more votes than any other president. When I showed the fallacy in your logic because there are more voters every year, you switched it and claimed you were referring to the electoral college, so then when I busted you on that by showing that there were presidents before him who had more electoral votes now you want to change it to some other crap. It isn’t about Romney it’s about your invalid claims about Obama. You are full of crap Knownothing, a waste of time.

          • Anonymous

            And Obama did get more votes than any other president. FACT. Not logic, not a fallacy, FACT. who’s the liar, liar?

          • Sandie

            That liar would be you, knowitnone.
             Just a little reminder:

            Knowitsome
            “I was speaking of the electoral college. ”

            Sandie
            “Don’t lie and try to wiggle your way out of it. Sorry to bust your bubble, but you missed again. ………
            He didn’t get the most there either, that was Reagan with 525. FDR had 523 and even Nixon got 520. Sorry kid, you lose.”
            .
            .So you can see that he in fact did NOT win more votes than any other president

          • antithetical radical

            Knowitsome is a moron, and he’s brain-laundered. Nothing his precious pResident does is ever wrong, bad or evil. Even parading school children out to use them in a pandering opportunity is OK for this idiot.

            Such stupidity seems to be the order of the day here. The lefties are invading in force and no one here seems to have the will to act or stop them.

            One day soon, the only people left to comment here will be the liberals.

          • Sandie

            Ya, the libs and the conspiracy theorists. Both are out in loony land.

          • antithetical radical

            They are allies who walk hand in hand is how they see it. You can tell by how they support each other. They are probably sitting next to each others at the Media Matters boiler room.

          • Sandie

            They are playing tag team troll.

          • antithetical radical

            Too bad for them it doesn’t work.

          • BentGhazi

            knownothing is a colossal waste of time, but then so is
            pResident Evil.

          • SoThere

            Obama squeaked by with 400 thousand votes.  1% and even that’s debatable with all the Libtard voter fraud that was out there.

            Obama Kissed the Butts of the Socialist money grubbers like Georgy Schwartz.  If it wasn’t for the LSM Obama would be on permanent vacation right now.

          • Anonymous

            Want some cheese with that whine? The election is over. Or we could talk about how Bush stole the election in 2000 after losing the electoral college AND the majority of votes. The supremes ignored states’ rights and refused to let Florida recount. That recount later showed bush lost.

          • SoThere

            More Libtard garbage. It’s not working. Sorry pal but you Libtards don’t control the discussion here or anywhere except your Lib sites.
            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

          • Anonymous

            You’re repeating yourself. Rudely, too. Did your mother teach you to speak like that? What a failure she was.

          • SoThere

            It takes more than once to get through a Libtards scull.

            You’re a prime example. Stop your incessant whining.

            You have a nice whining libtard day now, ya hear?

            LMAO

            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

          • Anonymous

            That’s like the 10th time you’ve said that. Can’t think of anything real, huh? You really are a child.

          • SoThere

            When is it going to penetrate your Libtard skull?

            I’m all real, you’re the ignoramus here, you keep coming back for more.

            LMAO

            “Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

          • Anonymous

            lol. You’ve got nothing to say. Just name calling. Hilarious. And sad. But if you represent the far right, we progressives have a great future. Lol.

        • Anonymous

          Name some of those lies. I’ll start with one of Bush’s: Iraq had WMDs.
          Now tell us some of President Obama’s lies, and how many people they’ve gotten killed, or be exposed as a flaming hypocrite.

          • Sandie

            It is all a matter of public knowledge – except maybe to the mental midgets libs who only listen to MSNBC. WMD was what intel to GWB. Do some research. You want some Obama lies? Here’s just a few:

            Lies During Third Year
            I will walk on that picket line with you, if workers are denied the right to bargain.
            Youtube http://youtu.be/SA9KC8SMu3o
            In his 2012 State of the Union Address, President Obama said that American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years.
            http://www.breitbart.com http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/22/report-oil-production-on-federal-lands-dropped-275000-barrels-a-day-in-2011
            I’ve done more for Israel’s security than any President ever
            Obama aided Islamic Extremists take over of Egypt/ Libya – Weapons pour into Gaza http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391071/G8-summit-Barack-Obama-David-Cameron-ask-allies-bankroll-Arab-Spring-countries-embrace-democracy.html
            http://bigpeace.com/jbradley/2011/10/14/libyan-weaponry-pours-into-gaza-empowers-hamas/
            Virtually every Senate Republican voted against the tax cut last week
            Examiner http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/obama-falsely-claims-no-gop-senators-voted-for-payroll-tax-cut
            “Every idea that we’ve put forward are ones that traditionally have been supported by Democrats and Republicans alike.”
            Like Raising taxes? http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/07/ap-fact-check-wonders-if-obama-bothers-to-listen/
            Obama met highly qualified out of work teacher Robert Baroz
            He wasn’t out of work and Obama never met him. http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2011/10/07/why-isnt-obamas-teacher-lie-national-news/
            GOP Responsible for Obama Jobs Bill Not Passing
            Dems Rejected Jobs Bill http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2791287/posts
            You have 80 percent of the American people who support a balanced approach. Eighty percent of the American people support an approach that includes revenues and includes cuts. So the notion that somehow the American people aren’t sold is not the problem
            Gallup Poll: Only 69% http://www.gallup.com/poll/148472/Deficit-Americans-Prefer-Spending-Cuts-Open-Tax-Hikes.aspx/t_blank
            These are obligations that the United States has taken on in the past. Congress has run up the credit card, and we now have an obligation to pay our bills.
            Looks like it’s been incurred mostly in the years of Obama http://obamalies.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/deficit.jpg
            Jobs Bill Paid for
            Seems not so much Paid for http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ap-fact-check-obamas-jobs-plan-paid-for-seems-not/
            Then you’ve got their(GOP)which is dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health insurance
            Barack Obama, campaiging in Asheville, NC, 10/17/11 http://obamalies.net/gop-wants-dirtier-air.html
            I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.
            American.com http://blog.american.com/2011/07/would-social-security-benefits-be-cut-if-the-debt-limit-is-not-increased/
            USA producing more oil than ever before
            Petroleum Insights http://petroleuminsights.blogspot.com/2011/04/us-crude-oil-production-1970-1980-1990.html
            Fence between US and Mexico is “Practically Complete”
            Department of Homeland Security says 5% http://nation.foxnews.com/border-fence/2011/05/10/obama-claims-border-fence-basically-complete-its-only-5-finished
            Rich doesn’t pay their fair share.
            National Taxpayers Union http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
            Mitt Romney would deny gay people the right to adopt children.
            Cnn Interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMWphSqLRmE

            Lies During Second Year
            Obama claimed the SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. FEC, “open[ed] the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections.
            nationalreview.com http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/193894/president-wrong-i-citizens-united-i-case/bradley-smith
            No signing statements to nullify or undermine congressional instructions as enacted into law (LMAO)
            Obama Lies to Keep Czars http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-about-signing-statements.html That’s only one sample ….
            No “boots” on the ground Libya
            Anyone that has worked with the AC-130 gunship can tell you, you need spotters to let aircraft know where the targets are. Usually it is Special Forces, Rangers etc trained for this mission. It’s CIA Agents in Libya on the ground http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html?_r=1&hp
            Reform will also rein in the abuse and excess that nearly brought down our financial system. It will finally bring transparency to the kinds of complex, risky transactions that helped trigger the financial crisis.
            Obama Lies About Financial Reform Bill http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-about-financial-reform-bill.html
            All Americans WILL BE were, “surprised, disappointed and angry” about lockerbie bomber
            Obama Memo http://obamalies.net/obama-backed-release-of-lockerbie-bomber.html
            I will not rest until the BP Oil Spill stops
            Obama’s Schedule http://obamalies.net/obama-will-not-rest-untill-bp-spill-stops.html
            The health care bill will not increase the deficit by one dime.
            Campaign and Presidency
            If you like the health care plan you have you can keep it
            TownHall http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2011/02/02/if_you_like_your_plan,_you_can_keep_your_plan
            “Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place.”
            U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C., September 9, 2009. http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-about-funded-abortions.html
            ObamaCare Fee is not a new tax
            Obama denies healthcare is a new tax on all Americans http://obamalies.net/obama-denies-healthcare-is-a-new-tax-on-all-americans.html
            We have run out of places in the US to drill for oil.
            Obama’s oval office speech in June 2010 http://obamalies.net/obama-oval-office-bp-lies.html
            Now suddenly if you don’t have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you can be harassed, that’s something that could potentially happen.
            Arizona Immigration Law http://obamalies.net/the-lies-about-the-arizona-immigration-law.html
            Doctors choose amputation because they get better compensation. Greedy Doctors taking out tonsils for more money.
            Claims never documented http://obamalies.net/abc-reports-on-obamas-lies.html

            The Health Care Package will pay for itself
            Time http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1894939,00.html
            Republicans don’t have a single idea that’s different from George Bush’s ideas — not one.
            Hmm Immigration?

            We shouldn’t Mandate the purchase of health care
            Democratic Debate Lies http://obamalies.net/obama-liesmandates-purchasing-health-care.html
            Obama says he’ll save average family $8,000 in gas
            Video Proof http://obamalies.net/obama-says-hell-save-average-family-8000-in-gas.html
            I am immediately instituting PayGo “Pay as you go”
            Said during a speech immediately after the Trillion Dollar “Shovel Ready” bill. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/06/09/obama_announces_push_for_paygo.html
            I got the Message from Massachusetts
            Daily Bail http://dailybail.com/home/obama-discusses-the-message-of-massachusetts-healthcare-refo.html

            Lies During First Year
            We began by passing a Recovery Act that has already saved or created over 150,000 jobs.” – caught cooking the books and now changed to ‘jobs supported’ versus ‘created/saved’
            AP fact Checker http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/04/ap_fact_check_obama_disowns_de.html
            Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit. … That wasn’t me.” – Congress, under Democratic control in 2007 and 2008, controlled the purse strings that led to the deficit Obama inherited.Obama supported the emergency bailout package in Bush’s final months — a package Democratic leaders wanted to make bigger.
            AP fact Checker http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/04/ap_fact_check_obama_disowns_de.html
            Collective salvation
            Obama calls himself a Christian http://obamalies.net/0bama-says-hes-a-christian.html
            I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
            Obama Inauguration. 20 Jan 2009 – we all know what happened with that and what still is.
            Cut Deficit in Half by end of first term
            Associated Press Video http://obamalies.net/obamas-pledge-to-cut-deficit-in-half-laughable.html
            Health Care deals will be covered on C-span
            Obama Lies http://obamalies.net/obama-lied-about-c-span.html
            As President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide
            ABC http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/04/once-again-president-obama-breaks-promise-to-call-armenian-genocide-genocide.html

            Recovery Act will save or create jobs
            ABC News http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jobs-saved-created-congressional-districts-exist/story?id=9097853
            Unemployment rate will be 8.5% without stimulus.
            Obama Lies http://obamalies.net/obamas-economic-plan.html
            No Earmarks in the $787 Billion Stimulus
            CNN http://obamalies.net/787-billion-stimulus-bill-with-earmarks.html
            I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care plan
            Specator.Org http://spectator.org/blog/2009/08/11/obama-lies-on-single-payer-dis
            We have launched a housing plan that will help responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower their monthly payments and refinance their mortgages.
            Obama Lies http://obamalies.net/obamas-bailout-lies.html
            I am not somebody who promotes same-sex marriage.
            NPR http://obamalies.net/obamas-gay-marriage-lies.html
            Guantanamo bay to be closed within a year
            Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.cfr.org/publication/21247/should_guantanamo_bay_be_closed.html
            Won’t Raise taxes on those making less than 250,000 per year.
            Businessweek: Obama Agnostic on taxes http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-11/obama-agnostic-on-deficit-cuts-won-t-prejudge-tax-increases.html
            List of Tax Promise Violations http://obamalies.net/obama-lied-about-taxes-on-those-making-less-than-250000.html

            2008 Campaign Lies
            I will walk the picket line with you, if workers are denied the right to bargain
            Youtube http://youtu.be/SA9KC8SMu3o
            No more wiretapping of citizens
            Youtube http://youtu.be/gF3MC-TkpRQ
            Mr. Ayers as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” but “not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.
            News Busters http://newsbusters.org/blogs/rich-noyes/2008/09/23/barack-obama-bill-ayers-stanley-kurtz-makes-connection
            I had a uncle who was one of the, who was part of the first American troops to go into Auschwitz and liberate the concentration camps
            United States Holocaust Memorial Museum http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/auschwitz/
            Obama campaign would accept public funding
            ABC http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/06/how-mccains-pub.html
            Minimum Wage will increase to $9.50/hr
            A Socialist http://obamalies.net/death-center-leftism-decline-democratic-party.html
            Ann Dunham spent the months before her death in 1995 fighting with insurance companies that sought to deny her the coverage she needed to pay for treatment.
            Mounting Heath Care Lies http://obamalies.net/obamas-healthcare-lies-mounting.html
            Didn’t know Jeremiah Wright was Radical
            Dreams of My Father – A radical Socialist. http://obamalies.net/obama-wright-lies-exposed-18-months-late.html
            Would have the most transparent administration in History
            Cato Institute http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11449
            We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way.
            Boston Globe http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/11/obama_vows_line.html
            I have visited all 57 states.
            Snopes http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/57states.asp
            I’ll get rid of earmarks
            Source: Any bill passed during presidency http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-about-5-days-to-review-healthcare-bill.html
            When a bill lands on my Desk, The American people will have 5 days to review it before I sign it.
            Campaign Speech http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-about-5-days-to-review-healthcare-bill.html
            My father served in World War II.
            The Videos and the Facts http://obamalies.net/obamas-father-served-in-wwii.html
            Have troops out of Iraq by March 31, 2009
            News Video http://obamalies.net/obama-iraq-withdrawal-lies.html
            Seniors Making less than 50,000 will not have to pay taxes
            YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ouvmwpx4OY
            Would not vote for any bill supporting troop funding without a firm withdrawal commitment from the Bush Administration.
            He has done nothing but continue the Bush admins strategy and to explain how the “surges total failure” has now become his greatest achievement.
            Present Votes Are Common In Illinois
            NPR http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18348437
            I Won Michigan
            Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/05/david-gregory-gives-obama_n_90130.html
            I won Nevada
            The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blogs/state_of_change/272881
            I don’t Have Lobbyists
            US News http://www.usnews.com/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2009/01/22/no-lobbyist-in-the-obama-administration–except-when-there-is-one.html
            My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad
            Crooks and Liars http://crooksandliars.com/2007/03/20/the-mystery-behind-the-obama-1984-ad (just like his re-election campaign)
            I Have Always Been Against Iraq
            Washington Post http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/01/clinton_vs_obama_on_iraq.html
            My Wife Didn’t Mean What She Said About Pride In Country
            CNN http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/19/cindy-mccain-michelle-obama-in-patriotism-flap/
            Barack was never an ACORN trainer and never worked for ACORN in any other capacity.
            Obama Campaign Video http://obamalies.net/obama-flip-flops-on-acorn.html
            I Barely Know Rezko
            Sun Times http://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article
            My Church Is Like Any Other Christian Church
            ABC News http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/DemocraticDebate/story?id=4443788&page=1

            Oh here’s a few more:
            During the campaign:

            Obama claimed he did not cut permits and licenses for oil and gas leases on federal land and federal waters in half. After Obama called Romney a liar for bringing up the figure, Chris Wallace found out Romney was right but only after the debate was over.

            Obama’s campaign claimed Romney was planning a $5 trillion tax cut for the wealthy. Stephanie Cutter has come out and admitted this is untrue.

            OBAMA: “ We stabilized the banking system but we got back every dime we used to rescue the banks with interest.”
            Not. According to the Congressional Budget Office we’re losing $24 billion on that deal. The same day he said that, the CBO comes out and says we’ve lost $24 billion. That’s a lot of dimes, Mr. President.

            OBAMA: “Under Governor Romney’s definition, there are a whole bunch of millionaires and billionaires who are small businesses. Donald Trump is a small business.”
            Not.. Donald Trump has upwards of 25,000 employees, or more. His revenue and his other millionaires and billionaires receive ‑‑ the revenues that he receives makes him ineligible for this.

            Another lie. The president told Univision that he inherited the scandalous, deadly, and disastrous Fast and Furious program. OBAMA: First of all, I think it’s important for us to understand that the Fast and Furious program was a field‑initiated program begun under the previous administration. When Eric Holder found out about it, he discontinued it.
            This is an outrageous lie, according to ABC News. ABC reports in actuality the Fast and Furious program was started October 2009. October 2009. That’s the year the president got in. Bush’s last day ended in ’08. Instead Obama claims Bush started it, Holder discovered it and stopped it. Instead of beginning the plan in 2009? What?

            Benghazi – PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING

            Oh heres some from another list:

            1. Americans want higher taxes: During the debate over raising the debt ceiling, President Obama said that 80% of Americans support including higher taxes as part of the deal. But a Rasmussen poll taken the same week showed that only 34% believe a tax hike should be included in a debt-ceiling agreement.

            2. Mother denied health insurance: During his presidential campaign, Obama said that his mother died of cancer after being denied coverage for a preexisting condition. He used her image in a campaign ad, repeated the claim in debates, and used the same rhetoric as President when he tried to sell ObamaCare to the American people. But a new book by New York Times reporter Janny Scott says that Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, had health insurance through her employer and was only denied disability insurance.

            3. Tax restraint for middle and lower class: Obama pledged during his campaign and throughout his presidency not to raise taxes on families making less than $250,000. But ObamaCare’s individual mandate will hit many under the $250,000 mark. (Obama’s own Justice Department said the mandate was a tax, not a penalty, when it argued its constitutionality.) Not to mention a higher federal cigarette tax and countless other “fees” in the health care law that hit the middle and lower class.

            4. Shovel-ready jobs: When Obama was selling his $787 billion stimulus package, he consistently bragged about how shovel-ready construction jobs would be funded across the nation. Even the President later admitted that was a lie, when he told the New York Times: “There’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects.”

            5. Keep your doctor: President Obama repeatedly pledged that under his health care measure, Americans would be able to keep their doctors. However, with rising costs, many employers will dump their health care plans and force workers into the state health care exchanges (unless you belong to one of the unions getting ObamaCare waivers.) A survey by McKinsey & Company found that more than 30% of companies will discontinue coverage for their workers.

            6. No lobbyists: During the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama said: “We have the chance to tell all those corporate lobbyists that the days of them setting the agenda in Washington are over. … I don’t take a dime of their money, and when I am President, they won’t find a job in my White House.” At least a dozen former lobbyists got top jobs in his administration at the beginning of his presidency, according to Politico, and National Public Radio reported the Obama administration was granting waivers to lobbyists to circumvent the ban.

            7. Foreign money in campaigns: During his 2010 State of the Union address, and again during the 2010 midterm elections, Obama railed against foreign money influencing U.S. elections. The only problem was that there was no evidence to support the charge or, as Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, in the State of the Union audience, silently mouthed, “Not true.”

            8. Arizona immigration law: During the battle over Arizona’s immigration law, President Obama said: “Now suddenly if you don’t have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you can be harassed, that’s something that could potentially happen.” Uh, actually, Mr. President, it couldn’t. The law would allow law enforcement officials to inquire about immigration status only when there is suspicion of a crime being committed.

            9. Transparency: Obama pledged that transparency would be a top priority, but his administration refused to grant one-third of the Freedom of Information Act requests, according to an Associated Press analysis. He also was dishonest about transparency when he said that health-care negotiations would be televised on C-SPAN and that he would wait five days to sign a bill so people would have a chance to read it online.

            10. Constitutional oath: During his January 2009 inauguration, Barack Obama pledged to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” yet he has consistently ignored the 10th Amendment giving powers not enumerated in the Constitution to the states. Exhibit No. 1: ObamaCare.

          • Anonymous

            I’m sorry, did you copy and paste something? I missed it.

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            Put away the toys and take a gander at the comment on your computer, or won’t mommy let you have it past bedtime?

          • Anonymous

            Long, boring, unsourced, irrelevant.
            Meh.

            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            Can’t face the music can ya, that’s why you use a lame excuse like ‘long, boring’. LMAO! Wrong again. It is definitely relevant as that was the claim that YOU challenged and demanded an example of, and yes, it IS sourced… those things after the statements about BO’s lies are links to sources… reliable relevant sources – a concept foreign to you. So, stop the BS Knownothing. You are a phony just looking to troll around with baseless unsupported claims, and nothing cogent to offer, trying to stir the pot. You are nothing but a low level garden variety troll. Go back to your handlers at MM for further training. You’re another libby loser… “Meh” … LMAO! that’s what all the liberal lefty sheep say …. “Meh” … LMAO!

          • Anonymous

            What music? I have no idea what those videos claim to show. If you can use your own words, rather than copy and paste nonsense, then go for it. I don’t think you’re able.
            Sent from my bhaktiPad

          • Sandie

            Those were copy pasted from my own files, idiot. They contain the links that verify them. The only nonsense here is you. You still lose.

          • Anonymous

            So you admit it! Write an original thought if you can. Copying and pasting on a message board makes you a troll.

          • Sandie

             It’s not about c/p. it is about giving you what you asked for – some of Obama’s lies, and links to back it up, unlike you who provides no proof.. You want to weasel around it again. You lose. Again.

          • antithetical radical

            Every time he’s confronted with irrefutable fact, this is the result. He does the squishy pants dance.

          • Sandie

            Yes, he does. He even tries to turn the table by trying to frame his opponent as a troll by his own contrived definition when in fact he is the troll! LMAO! what a moron.

          • antithetical radical

            The transparent troll is what he is. Watch out, he will come back at us soon enough.

          • Sandie

            Get your umbrella out, or should that be shitshield?

          • antithetical radical

            Deployed and ready!

          • BentGhazi

            What a loser indeed.

          • BentGhazi

            Hey, wait a minute – I think I’ve got some old rusty sheep shears around here – maybe in the tool shed…

            I’ll be back, just hang onto that bleater for a few…

          • Sandie

            I bet you miss a lot of things.

          • Anonymous

            I miss the logic of right wingers who claim to support freedom, but want to enslave women by controlling their bodies, or who claim to support the constitution but think nothing of forcing their personal religious beliefs on others. Don’t understand that at all.
            Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • Sandie

            You’re changing the subject.
            .
            Then go figure it out. Take your bias glasses off first, and empty your head of the left wing talking points and misstated issues.
            .
            They don’t want to ‘enslave’ women – that is a left wing myth. Their issue is protecting unborn babies from murder. The left has twisted this into something it isn’t.
            .
            They support the Constitution, and are NOT trying to force their personal religious beliefs on anyone. That is another left wing myth. The issue is that they are protecting their freedom to have their religion (as well as the rights of others to practice theirs), from people who want to deny them that right, like the ACLU, some Muslims and some Atheists.
            .
            The left/liberals have been aggressive at framing these issues in a manner that is dishonest, the intent being to discredit and denigrate people with conservative values.
            .
            But then again, you are trying to change the subject.

          • Anonymous

            No, the issue is forcing other women to make the same life decisions as you. If you think abortion is wrong, don’t have one. No one is forcing you to have an abortion, and you can’t force anyone else not to. That’s called freedom, something conservatives like to espouse, except when someone makes a different choice than they do.

          • Sandie

            So you are saying murder is OK if it is your choice.

          • Anonymous

            It’s not murder. That’s a fact. Murder is unlawful killing and abortion is legal. Your opposition to abortion comes from your religious beliefs, and you simply can’t impose them on other people in this country. Just like I can’t force you to be a vegetarian, no matter how strongly I feel that killing animals for food is wrong, morally and every other way. Honor the constitution you claim to love.

          • Anonymous

            So you’re saying that laws determine the ethical principal rather than the ethical principal determining the law! So if there’s no law then there’s no ethics?  All  law is based on an ethical principal you halfwit! Your mental faculties are damaged. You have no ability to communicate abstract thought and your reasoning is circular. By the way, you’re a hypocrite!
            By your reasoning then slavery was not immoral.

          • Anonymous

            I’m not saying any of that. Try to listen to what I’m actually saying before you get all angry.
            Slavery is a good example. Always immoral, but legal for years.

            Morals come from within, or for the weak minded, a book.

            Laws come from the people.

            So laws against interracial marriage, which were immoral, changed, and so will anti-gay laws.
            But here’s a clue. If your “morality” causes you to discriminate or deprive rights from groups of people because of who they are, and not what they’ve done, then you’re on the wrong side of morality. And if your morals come from religion, you can’t force it on others. Unless you want Hindus making hamburgers illegal because they find meat eating immoral.

          • Anonymous

            Was the law against slavery based on an ethical principle or not? So then it can be proven that the ethical principal preceded the law. Otherwise justice is out the window. Killing another person for reasons other than self defense is murder by definition; Whether or whether not any formal laws are in place. There’s an ethical principal involved. A baby is another person.  Q.E.D., abortion is murder.
             In the case of women’s rights [or human rights for that matter] It may or may not be moral to demand people to do certain things with there bodies. Taking the naturalist view [for the sake of argument only] of ethics being determined by us alone, we still universally accept certain realities. It’s wrong to murder, steal, and lie to name a few. A pregnant woman’s body doesn’t belong to her alone but also to the baby which is a separate and distinct individual yet occupying and sharing the same flesh. This is by consensual agreement of the female when she had intercourse knowing  all the necessary consequence of the sexual union. You could say she now has a moral obligation to share her body with this other person and not only that but to care for it until it can care for itself because it now does not solely belong to her.
            Is it moral for my countrymen to demand that at times I sacrifice my life in service to my country. Damn straight! There’s an ethical principal involved. No one is forcing their religious beliefs on any one. We are forcing a universally agreed upon moral principal that is well grounded ethically, on people who wish to do an injustice. If I say that you mustn’t murder I haven’t forced anything on you unless you disagree with the ethic ; but if you disagree with the ethic you are  no better than a murderer.
            By your standards no one would even be allowed to participate in the due process of law in this country unless they were atheists. This would violate the First Amendment which guarantees me the right to practice my religion. The fact that we all practice our religions doesn’t mean we formally establish one through legislative action. We all have one by the way whether you acknowledge it or not.    

          • Anonymous

            It’s not a baby, or a person, until its born. If you believe otherwise, that is a religious belief. (Even though in the bible life begins at birth, not conception. )
            Practice your religion all you want. No one is stopping you. Never have an abortion. No one will ever force you to have one. That’s freedom.
            I appreciate how strongly you feel, but you must understand in this country you can’t force that on others.
            Just like I can’t force you to stop eating meat even though that is the killing of innocent life and therefore immoral and against god.

          • Anonymous

            It’s a scientific belief based on empirical evidence.
            Yours is a religious belief as well although I would guess you are a Materialist from your argument thus far. The point is there is common ground in almost all beliefs or should I say a common ethos. Murder is wrong in all of them that I can think of. If an unborn baby is a person then it can be universally accepted that abortion is murder. Take it as an if then proposition. I can provide enough substantial evidence that an unborn baby is a person that it would constitute logical proof. You cannot likewise prove your argument.
            The bible no where states that life begins at birth but explicitly implies that life begins at conception.
            If the government prevents you from killing another person then I they haven’t made you practice my religion even though in my religion it is a recognised as a commandment of God. The government would merely be requiring you to obey a universally agreed upon principal. Eating meat isn’t a universally agreed upon moral code such as murder. Murder and killing are not synonymous as murder refers to unjustified killing of which category abortion falls under.

          • Anonymous

            Definitely not a materialist. In fact, I’m an idealist. I think that consciousness is all there is, and the physical world is a shared experience. If you want to get into that.

          • Anonymous

            My point is that idealism like materialism has the creature as the determining factor involving morals and ethics. It’s really irrelevant except to say that your philosophy guides the exercising of your will to the point that it is religious by nature. The point of the first Amendment was to see that the government didn’t formally adopt a religion or require the citizens to participate in or deny their own freedom of religious expression. It wasn’t meant to deny a common ethic of an inherently religious people. No, don’t want to get into your philosophy. Stay on the subject if you wish to continue this discussion. 

          • Anonymous

            Abortion being wrong is NOT a common ethic. Most Americans support the right to choose.
            And common ethics can be wrong. The common ethic used to be that slavery was ok and ordained by god.
            On topic enough for ya?

          • Anonymous

            Nope! The point was not whether abortion is universally accepted. The point was whether the prohibition against murder is based on a universally accepted ethic. We can agree that it is I believe. Then we must decide whether or not abortion is murder. Whether or not we do that is determined by our definition of a baby and our definition of a person.
            There was never a common ethic of slavery; merely bad law that denied the common ethic. That’s what amendments are for; to correct bad law and articulate good ones according to the Constitution which is the outline for law in this country. We’re not talking about taking a poll to decide right from wrong here pal. We’re logically analysing the theory behind just law; so don’t give me the “Most Americans support” line of bullshit.
            There’s also a marked difference of things ordained by God and that which is approved of by Him. God has ordained everything that has come to pass.  

          • Sandie

            Not a fact. If you shoot a pregnant woman and here baby dies, you get charged with the murder of that child.
            You claim “Your opposition to abortion comes from your religious beliefs….” I never said or implied that I opposed abortion and the same goes for what my religious beliefs are or if I even have any. You are again making invalid assumptions. You know nothing about my beliefs. You are making up this stuff like you make up so much else.

          • antithetical radical

            And he does make up stuff – lots and lots of stuff.
            Q: is “stuff” code for something else?

          • Sandie

            Ahhh, the word “stuff”. What a wonderful, flexible word. In his case it has the George Carlin definition of ‘stuff’ – ie shit.

          • antithetical radical

            Exactly – I read, “Brain Droppings”, and passed it on. There was an excellent treatise on, “stuff”, in it.

          • Sandie

            Ya, Carlin had a way with words… LOL!

          • antithetical radical

            Most definitely. He was a man of vastly greater wisdom and intellect than most gave him credit for.

          • Anonymous

            So you support a woman’s right to choose? Awesome.

          • Sandie

            Did I say that? NO I didn’t. Just as I never said or implied that I opposed abortion I also never said or implied that I am in favor of it. You are again making invalid and ignorant assumptions,. which is at least in keeping with all your other posts on this site.

          • Anonymous

            It was a question. Relax. Did you see the question mark? That makes it a question, not an assumption.

          • Sandie

            Ahh, an assumption with a question mark? You followed it with a word that that showed your intent. Did you see my question mark?
            You are a little troll full of paralogistic babble. Now that is a period because there is no question about it! Exclamation point.

          • BentGhazi

            You are right, it is murder. This freak is a moron.

          • Sandie

            Understand , if you can, that I am not necessarily taking that view, I am just trying to explain something to you so that you might understand where they are coming from.

          • Anonymous

            Thanks. Do I seem like I don’t understand their position?

          • Sandie

             Yes.

          • antithetical radical

            He does not understand because of two things – first is that is a conscious decision, the second is he’s a libtard, and that’s what they all do.

          • Sandie

            That’s typical but look at his idiotic response to my simple, straightforward answer of “yes”. LMAO! how much more definitive and clearer can I get? LMAO!

          • antithetical radical

            No answer will satisfy this moron.

          • Sandie

            You are right, he just comes back with some disjointed nonsense … like people who talk just to hear themselves. He can’t seem to help it – probably a mental issue – no guns for that kook!

          • antithetical radical

            For sure – he is certifiable.

          • Anonymous

            Feel free to clarify.

          • Sandie

            LMAO! You asked a question that elicits a yes or know answer. It doesn’t get any clearer than that. Please feel free to continue to display your significant stupidity though. You keep confirming it with every post you make, troll.

            LMAO! troll wants to have “yes” clarified! AHA-HA-HA-HAAAAA!

          • Anonymous

            Lol. Nice evasion. I didn’t think you could come up with anything.

          • Sandie

            That was no evasion, it was right on target! LMAO!
            You just can’t deal with a beat down. Too funny.
            So you come up with some sort of lame tactic to try to change the picture. No one is believing it troll.

            Please continue to make an ass of yourself. As a representative of the left you are doing a great job at making your group out to be the idiots they are. LMAO!

          • BentGhazi

            This person is willfully ignorant, and he’s stupid too.

          • BentGhazi

            Funny how they are all programmed to say the same stuff and post the same tired old arguments.

            These people are never about the Constitution – it gets in the way of their goals to enslave the world. This is the same crap that went through Germany in the 1920’s –
            we have ten years before they get done if the people don’t wake up and do something.

        • Anonymous

          Like BentGhazi says “pResident Evil”

  • Anonymous

    If you think the economy is more important than the environment, try holding your breath while counting your money.

    • Anonymous

      If you think the environment is an all important issue superseding all others, try living without affecting it in any way. Both are important but right now there isn’t an environmental crisis and there is an economic one.

      • Anonymous

        I’m not saying outlaw cars. And yes, there is an environmental crisis. But it’s not one or the other. Balance. But one is clearly more important. We can live without driving to the mall. We can’t live without clean water and air.

        • Anonymous

          You can’t live without driving to your job or the grocery store. I look around and don’t see any imminent threats except those caused by panic stricken people such as yourself. Who are you listening to?

          • Anonymous

            Of course you can. Walk. God gave you legs.

            I’m listening to scientists. Who are you listening to?

          • Anonymous

            God gave me car and a log truck. Should I carry the timber to the mill on my back? Should I walk 15 mi. to town for groceries. Are you sure you’re not a college student? Your just about liberal and naive enough to fit the bill. I listen to scientists also. Not the same ones as you apparently. Plus I have a lot of experience in different things.

          • Anonymous

            God gave you a car? I thought you worked for that car?

            Maybe you can’t afford the luxury of living 15 miles out of town.

            I’m glad you’re listening to scientists. Then you know evolution is well-supported and human caused climate change is a firmly established fact.

        • Anonymous

          “Freedom and rights must always be analysed according to the ethics of God.”When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
          We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of HappinessThe Declaration of Independence which thought carries over into the Constitution acknowledges this fact. This in no way establishes a religion ou prohibits the free exercise thereof. How by stating this proposition have I imposed my belief on you? When people [men and women] abort babies they are depriving a person of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. When the government fails to uphold justice then it is itself unjust.

          • Anonymous

            And if you make abortion illegal, you are depriving women of their right to liberty, happiness, and sometimes life.
            Rights are ALWAYS a trade off.

            The Declaration was written to inspire people to go to war. It is not law. God was left out of the Constitution, on purpose. And belief in God takes many forms, only a few of which concern themselves with running around telling others what to do.

          • Anonymous

            Rights are never a trade off in the sense you are talking about. Rights must always be linked to a concept of justice. Do you have the right to do wrong? Only a fool would answer this in the affirmative. The Declaration of Independence was not written to inspire men to go to war, although it may have helped in this regard but to show just and moral grounds for rebelling against the King of England and his unjust rule. The people who wrote it did not consider it a small matter before God, to rebel against a standing government; thus the need to show good cause. I already made the point that while it is not the law it is also not contrary to the Constitution which follows. The point is that you will always determine ethics by your concept of God whether that concept is right or wrong. Whether you believe in God or not you surely must admit that murder is wrong. I believe it is because God has determined it. You may believe it originates with you. Either way we would both have a similar moral conviction but a different ethical commitment. The Constitution is based on the premise that our rights re from God and therefore irrevocable by men. the purpose of the Constitution is to recognise our rights and delegate certain powers to the federal government. Mentioning God has never been construed to be an infringement of “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” If you think this gives you the right to kill the unborn then you contradict your own stated values.
            The law always informs whoever it’s written to, of what they must do or not do if they don’t wish to be in violation of it and suffer the just consequences of the law giver or His delegate.

          • Anonymous

            Once again; no one has the right to murder another person. Even if it makes them happy.

    • Anonymous

      Speak to the god of ecology; perhaps he can help you with global warming and stop the rising of the oceans. Oh I know, better yet….kill off man…..problem solved!

      • Anonymous

        Yes, if we don’t do anything, mankind will die off. Is that what you want?

        I’m afraid some of you radical Christians have been so brainwashed to hate this life and look forward to a mythical heaven, that you do want that.

        And that’s what’s scary.

        • Anonymous

          Well, I suppose you could look at it that way. But than again, sometimes it does take money…lots of it to fund such environmental projects. Wishing it won’t make it happen. I also suppose perhaps you think money grows on trees, eh?

          • Anonymous

            Ther’s money in trees to be sure. I know because I’m a logger. that is unless Knowitall and his/her leftwit friends have their way!

          • Sandie

            If they find out the Spotted Toe Wink is becoming extinct you are out of luck. Look what they did to hang onto the Two Faced Bario Bomba.

          • Anonymous

            Now that’s good stuff! LOL

  • Elizabeth Bracy

    I think true conservatives need to lead a movement to re-declare the Declaration of Independence, specifically the part which states that when government becomes destructive it is the right of the people to abolish it and institute a new government. This is the only way to get the federal government back to the people.

    • Anonymous

      Is that why you guys are stockpiling assault rifles?

      • Elizabeth Bracy

        I don’t own any guns, but if I want to go out and buy 6 rifles and 6 pistols, I have the RIGHT UNDER THE 2ND AMENDMENT!

        • Anonymous

          How’s that well-regulated militia that you’re in?

          You have the right to eat a hundred Twinkies, but is that a wise idea?

  • Anonymous

    “Freedom and rights must always be analysed according to the ethics of God.”
    When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
    dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to
    assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which
    the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the
    opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel
    them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that
    they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among
    these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
    The Declaration of Independence which thought carries over into the Constitution acknowledges this fact. This in no way establishes a religion ou prohibits the free exercise thereof. How by stating this proposition have I imposed my belief on you? When people [men and women] abort babies they are depriving a person of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. When the government fails to uphold justice then it is itself unjust.
     

    • Anonymous

      And when people outlaw abortion for all because of their personal religious beliefs, they violate the constitution, and deprive women of their rights to liberty and sometimes life.

      Rights and Freedoms are ALWAYS a tradeoff.

      • Anonymous

        Apparently Obama is not concerned with violating our 2nd ammendment right by taking away our right to bear arms.  If you want to talk about our constitutional rights being taken away, Obama is doing such on a daily basis, but blind followers like you choose not to see what is directly in front of your face.

        As for abortion, well that is a moral issue.  Thou Shalt Not Kill.  But then, I would not expect you to know anything about that.

        • Anonymous

          1. You’re quoting from the Bible. I’m sure you must understand that freedom of religion is protected by the Constitution. You simply can’t pass laws based on Bible verses.

          2. If you actually read the Old Testament, it’s clear that life begins at birth, not conception. There are several examples.

          3. Do you eat meat? They kill animals for your food, you know. If you follow that commandment, you should be a pure vegetarian. Also, do you protest every war we get into? Do you oppose the death penalty? Kill, kill, kill. We kill things all the time. Anyway, it doesn’t say “thou shalt not kill”, it says “thou shalt not murder”.

          That’s the abortion issue, your side destroyed. As far as guns, Obama can’t pass laws, and hasn’t taken a single gun away from anyone. So get real. If possible.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=581834054 Ginny Auldridge

    THANK YOU!!! a name is a powerful thing. silence on a name [or image of a man] removes and obliterates his power. thank you thank you thank you!!!

    • Anonymous

      I think you’re on to something! If you all stop saying his name, then he won’t have any power! He won’t even be President anymore! In fact, if you ignore him, maybe God will make him disappear!  Good plan!!

  • http://suzeraining.wordpress.com/ suz

    the blacked-out eye is effective, yes, but no image is better.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_X2NAPSXIXUJPOPPGU6CXVFQFLA Snorri Sturluson

    The real name is not Obama; it’s Marx; it’s anti-American; it’s anti-Constitution; it’s historically ignorant liberal. This Obama administration lies and distorts to the the degree that the average citizen has no idea or concept of how the Federal government will act. We have assault weapons given to Mexican drug cartels; four dead State Dept. people in Libya; a deserted former combat Marine illegally put into a Mexican jail; and sundry sheer indifference about the fate and well being of Americans in need at home and abroad. It is as if the Federal government gives lip service while simultaneously ignoring incidents not in their political agenda while the main stream media dithers and looks to a new “Garden of Eden”. It’s really Russia under Stalin’s bureaucracy. Will it soon be an example of Mao’s reasoning? The name is EVIL.

    • Anonymous

      Groucho? Harpo?

      Yes, we’re living in Stalinist Russia. That’s why when you post messages critical of President Obama, you’re immediately shipped off to labor camps in Siberia.

    • BentGhazi

      Like I said, pResident Evil.

  • Anonymous

    Way to go I hate it when other talk shows play sound bites of “that guy”

  • Anonymous

    We know it means the mass suicide in Guayana, the point is it was mostly black people that drank the koolaid.

    • Guest

      Thanks for confirming what I wrote: <a href="Glenn Beck is using code for his racist views. You’re not so subtle.

      Plus, you’re just for of crap.  Most people, who voted for Obama, were white.

      • Anonymous

        I would guess the black vote was significant…..99.9 %. They are nothing if not loyal. It has nothing to do with race, black or white. It has everything to do with control and believing you weren’t lied to. Some blacks didn’t fall for the lie and many whites didn’t either. What does this tell you? Before you answer, You my little fella, don’t know what color I am, so you can keep your smarmy, ignorant rant to yourself.

        • Anonymous

          The Hispanic vote was even more important. But face it, Obama won every demographic except bitter old white men.

          • Anonymous

            Again, you could look at it that way, or perhaps you were all fooled? Or should I say, WE?

          • BentGhazi

            Racist.

      • BentGhazi

        Looks like you are “just for of crap”. Back up your claim on who voted for him. 
        I don’t think that assertion jives with the facts.

        So proud of your comments you guest them. Impressive.

        • SoThere

          It’s Vicky. He’s a sick puppy.

          • Sandie

             Well, that’s the first time I’ve seen ‘asshole’ spelled p u p p y.

          • BentGhazi

            I thought the smell was familiar.

        • Sandie

          Nothing Vic says jives with the facts.

          • BentGhazi

            EVER.

          • BentGhazi

            That’s undeniable. He’s the biggest liar on the internet.

          • BentGhazi

            With him it is always 100% jive and zero on the facts.

      • Sandie

         “Most people, who voted for Obama, were white.” Wow, how profound, it happens that most of the voting population is white. Do some research and check out the demographics. Most blacks voted for Obama. 

    • Anonymous

      leave it to you guys to make even that a race thing. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=631852828 Rachel Wykoff

     No. lol. I give Glenn a week :p

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YETNCRIA5ULHWYR3UMNDUIY5MI C

    Why don’t you come up with a name that describes his evil bent – instead of just calling him “that guy”? “That guy” is not going to catch on as it is neutral. For example, Hannity calls him “the annointed one”. Today, I heard him called “the con-artist”. I overheard some men chatting the other day: they were noting his similarities to Adolph!!!

    • Anonymous

      Let’s refer to him as “it” because we really don’t know what it is. We can guess, but we really don’t know if it’s even human.

    • BentGhazi

      pResident Evil.

  • Guest

    “That guy” is code for “n**gar.” When will Beck’s gullible followers figure out that Glenn Beck is a racist.

    • Anonymous

      that’s what they like about him.

    • BentGhazi

      Beck is no racist, but you, that’s another story.

      • SoThere

        Libtards are all Racists. Look what they’re doing to Tim Scott.

        • BentGhazi

          Transparent racism is an ugly business.

    • Sandie

       Well, well, it’s the delusional, cognitively challenged Victor Tiffany, the cowardly racist “Guest” and jealous race baiting Beck hater, ‘yellow propagandist’ (oh hell, let’s  just call it like it is, ‘outright liar’) , proud but lonely bugsite operator, king of ad-hominems and vilification, and abuser in general.

      • Guest

         Looks like Victors posts are getting removed – LMAO

  • http://twitter.com/fawnday Dawn Brayton

    Stu is right about how if you can say that man’s name along with the word “care” it’s saying his name even though it’s part of a larger word. It’s just like saying the Muslim Brotherhood is a secular organization even though the name of the religion is in the title. So there HAS to be another word for the care part of that man’s care. Which probably means having a synonym book in the studio or something.

    • Anonymous

      yeah maybe if you guys never say his name, he’ll just disappear! It could happen. You know, if God wants it to.

      • Anonymous

        Damn Skippy!

  • Anonymous

    I am so glad because hearing that guy’s name makes me sick.

    • Anonymous

      Lol. You can’t articulate any disagreement about policies, you just can’t stand to hear his name. Another mature American. This is fun.

      • BentGhazi

        I believe it his his policies that are making us all sick of hearing his voice, seeing his face and hearing/speaking his name. There’s plenty of disagreement with his policies, you just choose to be blind/deaf/dumb about it. That’s probably why you think he’s a great person. He isn’t, and you couldn’t be more wrong. 

        • Anonymous

          Oh I know some disagree with him. The right wing haters want everyone to suffer except big business. They want more guns and don’t want clean air and water. And they absolutely hate women.
          Sent from my bhaktiPhone

          • BentGhazi

            Those who disagree with him are in good company. You, on the other hand, not so much. It’s not important what you send from, the content is what matters – and your content stinks.

          • Anonymous

            It’s nice to have opinions. It’s better to know why.

          • BentGhazi

            I know why – it’s you that are questionable.

          • Anonymous

            Yes, I ask questions.

          • BentGhazi

            It’s not the asking of questions, it’s the content of them that matters. Apparently you are satisfied with becoming a slave.

          • Anonymous

            Oh, I gotta hear this. How am I a slave?

          • BentGhazi

            You are here, spreading the liberal anti-gospel, that’s how. What is your purpose, slave?

          • Anonymous

            You didn’t answer the question.. How am I a slave?

          • BentGhazi

            My ISP dropped out for some reason. I have replied to your comments.

            You are a slave because you are following the script that all liberals use when they come here to disrupt discussions. All of you do the same things, say the same things, and comment in the same manner. The tactics you operate under are very distinctive, and all of you employ them in the same ways.

          • SoThere

            Right on Brother. You said it in one post. Great stuff.

          • Anonymous

            I have no script. I speak from my heart and mind. The fact that some agree with me means little. I know we all look alike to you, but that tells us more about you. Try again. How am I a slave?

          • BentGhazi

            As I explained to you previously, I am done with entertaining foolishness. Move-on.org out of here, okay?
            (I know you won’t but I had to say it.)

          • Anonymous

            Lol! See, that was very cute.

            You keep saying goodbye but you dont go anywhere.

          • BentGhazi

            You are a simple minded libtard, aren’t you? But, you obey your masters well, you will make an excellent drone for pResident Evil.

          • SoThere

            He’s an Obama Cultist, what did you expect from the idiot?

          • BentGhazi

            …Absolutely nothing – say it again,
            Lib-tards! What are they good for?
            Absolutely nothing – say it again!

          • SoThere

            They are finding out that the Libtard propaganda isn’t working anymore. The election’s over and they expected us to disappear but we’re still here and they’re upset.

            The Obama cultists are upset because we’re gearing up for 2014, just like we did on 2010. State elections aren’t like National elections, no free Obama Phones to bribe the ignorant with.

            People will be voting on their taxes and Obama has insured that they are looking at some pretty substantial increases. 77% are going to see a smaller paycheck next week.

            Hey Obama Cultists…H E L L O !

          • BentGhazi

            Absolutely – the mass cries of their suffering are about to begin. As pResident Evil said, “Elections have consequences”, so to the libtards out there, meet the consequences!

          • Anonymous

            Funny coming from a sheep. I’m more free than you could imagine. But since you don’t know me, any perception is projection. Stupid people see others as stupid. If you can even understand that.

          • BentGhazi

            There is a difference between free and worthless. Your postings reveal you are far from free – you regurgitate the words of your masters, and are an obedient drone.

          • Anonymous

            Really? Who said those words before I? Whose words am I copying? Lol.

          • BentGhazi

            Your libtard masters – the ones you slavishly adore.

          • Anonymous

            Can you be more specific, or does your delusion not give you those kind of details?
            Exactly whose words am I copying, what was said, and when?

            Or be outed as another right winger divorced from reality like your hero Larry Craig.

          • BentGhazi

            Larry Craig? He is irrelevant to this discussion, and by bringing him up you have demonstrated the well worn tactics of liberals – in particular introducing a tangent to the original discussion. That is known as topic steering, and we here have seen a lot of that, and readily recognize it for what it is.

          • Anonymous

            And you just evaded the question, an even lamer and cowardly tactic.

            Lol, didn’t think you had anything.

          • BentGhazi

            You aren’t really interested in what I say, you consider me a target, fine and dandy. I’ve wasted enough time on you already. No evading the question, I answered it for you already – you just didn’t want to recognize the answer.

          • Anonymous

            Come on now, you made a couple funny comments back there, don’t give up.

          • BentGhazi

            “Who said those words before I? ”
            Every liberal who comes here wanting to troll says them. There have been literally hundreds before you, and you all say the same things.

          • Anonymous

            Maybe it sounds the same because you don’t understand it.
            In any case, it’s just a lame excuse for your inability to articulate a coherent position.

          • BentGhazi

            I don’t think I have a problem articulating a coherent position, and if you really read what I write, you will see that.

          • SoThere

            Bent, he’s not willing to see anything but his leftist ideology. You’re not a liberal so nothing you say will actually sink in. Watch him, he thinks you’re a “Teabagger”.

          • BentGhazi

            My family has been defending America and the Constitution for well over one hundred years, we are not sheep – we just wear their hides to confuse you.

          • Anonymous

            Did you serve personally? If so, thanks.
            That has nothing to do with politics.
            Unless you’re fighting other Americans like that loyal conservative and soldier Timothy McVeigh did.

          • BentGhazi

            Yes, in Vietnam. I am not fighting anyone except those who would harm America, The Constitution, or the people. McVeigh was a very misguided individual, so I don’t see the relevance in mentioning him. A person can be patriotic and still not be an extremist. The problem now in the rhetoric loaded model of today is everything is for or against, black and white, on or off. There is no moderation, especially in politics – it has become all about polarization. There’s a lot more to life than what people (sometimes ill intentioned professors with a radical agenda) teach in schools today. It’s been going that way since the late 1960’s and it has gotten to the point that all sanity has been abandoned by those who teach the left wing point of view as fact. Extremes very seldom are aligned with truth. I am not for the strict dogmatic adherence to any political party anymore, but the conservative view holds with everything that made America the world home of freedom, and that is why people flee every other place on earth just to be here.

            I oppose radicalism no matter which direction it points. I do believe in one basic set of principles, and they are contained within The Constitution. The problems our country has now and we are suffering under are a direct result of abandoning our basic principles as a nation. It all goes back to The Constitution, and those we trust to preserve and uphold the contents thereof.

            Anyone who disagrees with that, is either indoctrinated or uneducated. All we ever needed in a government at the federal level is contained in one place – The Constitution.

          • Anonymous

            Again, thanks for serving, whether or not you were drafted. I hope you hear that a lot.
            I agree with you. But don’t you think you’re adding to the problem by proclaiming the leftists as always wrong and conservatives as always right? I certainly don’t always agree with the left, but not all ideas on the left are radical, just like some of the ideas coming out of the right are radical.

          • BentGhazi

            I enlisted like all my family before me.

          • Anonymous

            Cool. Well, don’t forget there are extremists on both sides of the political fence and all religions. (And I hate to say it, but Beck is one of them…)

  • Anonymous

    I need to comment on this one as the number I have in my profile comments is 444 which in Chinese means die, die die. And the amount of “likes” I have received is 666…..we all know what that means. What are the chances of this sequence occurring?

    Thank you Jesus for bringing life back into my soul.

    • Anonymous

      sounds like the devil has your soul. would jesus let you get 666 likes?!? no, only satan would do that.

      • Anonymous

        You are certainly very proficient in sentence structure! But thought process, not so much. Bingo on the Jesus part…..you should look into His teachings and perhaps we can both be enlightened.

        • Anonymous

          I’m sure we could both benefit from a great deal of education. But if enlightenment is your goal, you’d be better off studying the teachings of the Buddha.

          • Anonymous

            I have actually learned quite a bit from Buddha, but unlike Jesus, He can’t give me eternal life. When you die sunny boy, your body gets buried and your soul…well your soul is a different story, for some other time. Peace to you my friend and God have mercy on you.

      • BentGhazi

        He’s got 675 now. I guess that blows your theory all to hell.

        • Anonymous

          But not literally.

          • BentGhazi

            Literally AND figuratively.

    • Anonymous

      now you have 667 brother!

      • Anonymous

        Thank you! I hear Osama (BHO) has that etched on his crown.

  • maria

    my buddy’s mom makes $75 an hour on the internet. She has been out of a
    job for nine months but last month her pay check was $17401 just working
    on the internet for a few hours. Here’s the site to read more http://www.bit90.com

  • Anonymous

    my best friend’s step-sister makes $85/hour on the
    internet. She has been out of a job for 7 months but last month her
    check was $17542 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more
    on this site =============bit90.com=============
     

  • Anonymous

    until I saw the bank draft which said $6117, I accept
    …that…my neighbour woz like actualey bringing in money parttime on
    their apple laptop.. there neighbour has done this 4 only sixteen months
    and resently cleared the mortgage on their villa and bought a great
    new Mazda. we looked here, =============bit90.com=============

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Glenn, count me in for 2013! Is it ok to say pee pee man, in reference to that person?

    • Anonymous

      Yeah, if you’re 3 years old.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/Q4RIW4C72ODC5PKFVCPPF6SK3I William

    Since before “that guy” got elected to the highest office of the land, I have not used his name!..
    Instead, having heard a talk-show person, a woman, ( I did not get her name) suggested we call him by his initials, as in, FDR-JFK-LBJ, etcetera, we should refer to ‘him’ as BHO…..but since it doesn’t roll out as easily as the others, we should say B-HO when referring to ‘that guy’….So, from that moment on, I never use his name, even when reading it…..I always say B-HO when in conversation with someone, or even when reading that name…..which may NOT even BE his real, legal name anyway!!!!!

    • Anonymous

      Another extremely mature response from a great American. Lol. 

  • Anonymous

    Since the day after the election 2008, I refuse to say that name.  It is worse than saying the f-word. I call him Satan and Mrs. Satan his wife. I know I am suppose to respect the office, but according to Article 2, he is not the President. U.S. had 43 presidents and now 1 dictator.

    • Anonymous

      That’s very mature of you. You’re a great American.

  • http://www.khxdesign.com/ Kevin Wegner

    Sorry Glenn – this is just silly. There is not a single legitimate reason to do such a thing. Then again, I think I remember myself doing something similar when I was in Kindergarten. Moving on…

  • BentGhazi

    I intend only to refer to him as pResident. In no way is he fulfilling the duties of a US Commander in Chief, chief of the Executive branch of the federal government; he only occupies the people’s house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Hence, he is now pResident, and nothing more. By the end of his term we will have paid $58 million for his family Christmases. That doesn’t count all the other exorbitantly expensive get away trips for his family. I would not be surprised if these people have already consumed $50 million in the four years they’ve occupied our house.

    He’s a sham, a disgrace, and willfully engaged in destroying America. 

    • J Cole

       You mad? Too bad there ain’t shit you can do about it except whine on the internet.

      LOL

      • BentGhazi

        I am never mad. The Congress can do plenty about it, and in the coming days they will be prodded into action.

  • H T

    who in the hell is Glenn Beck

    Some retarded racist looking for more attention as usual
    appealing to the one sided morons on the extreme right

    What a dumb ass statement
    No matter what u stupid worm
    He is YOUR PRESIDENT 2!!!
    stick that up ur hemrroided butt and take it

    Oh, and he has no need 2 say ur name
    Ur dumb racist A$$ aint even worth mentioning

  • maria

    Brianna. I can see what your saying… Valerie`s comment is super… on
    thursday I bought a great new Aston Martin DB5 when I got my cheque for
    $8205 thiss month and-more than, 10-k last-month. it’s realy the
    most-comfortable work I’ve ever had. I started this five months/ago and
    immediately was bringin home more than $84, per hour. I use this here
    great link,, http://www.bit90.com

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HC47GCSKV3E6H3AGLLEDZMFPF4 kawn

    I’m with Beck… I hope…No… I can live without that name. I hope my mouth works with me…….
    Good Luck Glenn……

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=769116327 Love Macione

    cuckoo, cuckoo

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cheryl-Cathcart/100000043528175 Cheryl Cathcart

    I think you should refer to “that guy” as King Kamehameha

  • Anonymous

    Beck is insane.  Perfect for the dullards that actually listen to him.