One main reason the media has become increasingly Progressive – the leadership of these companies is either fiscally or ideologically tied to the Democrats and Progressives, they want a state-sponsored media and are close to making it happen under Obama.

There will come a time when the media will understand why America no longer trusts them, as they have sold out their integrity and passion for truth for the glory of the world and enslavement to the government.

They have traded freedom for communism.

Good luck with the efforts, when the Blaze begins to become a success then expect Obama and the administration to come crashing down hard. God help us all if they succeed.

I just called the toll-free number provided by The Blaze. I was connected to Comcast, my cable company here in Utah. Unfortunately, I got an automated message saying that I had called the number for new customers and I was already a customer. I was told to call their regular number, then the message and call ended.

I am now on hold with a Comcast employee, who is very nice but does not know how to help me make a request to Comcast that they add The Blaze.

It has been 5 minutes and I am still on hold.

The Comcast employee just came back on the phone with me. She said that she had sent a request to Comcast to add The Blaze to their channel lineup. She said that the more people make this request, the more pressure will be put on Comcast to add The Blaze. She also said that Comcast meets quarterly to review these requests.

I asked her how she made the request. She said that it needs to be done by a Comcast employee internally. She also said that the pressure to add The Blaze will increase if other companies such as Dish already have it as a channel. She ended up being very helpful.

So, for those of us in Utah, you need to call 800-266-2278, the general number to Comcast. Be persistant. Be polite. Expect to be put on hold. Just keep asking for Comcast to add The Blaze as a channel. Eventually they will send a memo for you.

This is my experience. If someone else with Comcast has a different experience, please let us all know!

cc

I can’t imagine how completely the MSM will deride this channel WHEN it gets on the air.  The ratings will be phenomenal at first, and then dip slightly after a lot of sponsors lose their backbone and desert.  Sound familiar?  Oh wait, WE are the sponsors!  That is anyone who wants to hear the truth!  Glenn won’t get railroaded as easily this time.  This will be a VERY popular channel.

Glenn, Liberal news organization outnumber conservative ones because they’re smarter:  http://www.asanet.org/images/journals/docs/pdf/spq/Mar10SPQFeature.pdf

Nobody wants to hear their crap.

Beck and Fox supported so many of the same things.  Liberal networks like Beck also hated Newt, Trump, Paul, and others.

Popular with old fuckers who are dying off.

What the matter cry baby sad that he is doing better than MSNBC and current TV combined.

Well that the most narcissistic thing I have ever read in my life. Thank you for wasting my time.

Oh look at the troll projecting because he can’t understand why Glenn is so popular.

This is the condescension I would expect from a liberal.  I’m a conservative and I can talk circles around a lot of liberal peers of mine, many of whom pay NO attention to politics in the news.  Being a conservative doesn’t make you automatically stupid.  Being a liberal doesn’t make you automatically smart or well-informed.  To disagree with either of my previous two statements would mean to support a stereotype.  There are dumb conservatives and there are dumb liberals.  There are wise conservatives and (as much as I REALLY hate to admit it) there are many wise liberals everywhere.  
Please note that I’ve made an abdication here, in admitting that someone can be smart and disagree with me at the same time.  That is something that is very rare among liberals.
Let’s examine a few stereotypes that liberals make about conservatives.  You say that we are racist.  Yes some conservatives are racist, but not all.  Just walk into a church, you won’t hear any racist comment made at any time.  There are black people who go to church by the way.  You may also say that we all tote guns.  I have never shot a gun in my life, I have ZERO interest in guns.  But I do understand the words, “shall not be infringed.”  And alas, I’m a somewhat pacifistic CONSERVATIVE.  You also may say that we are mostly old, white, rich men.  
About 72% of the US population is white.  So let’s say 36% is white male.  Now let’s lop off the top 1%, those who apparently don’t pay their “fair share” of taxes, a number that has incidentally never been defined, yet fully demanded of them.  Okay so now we are looking at 35% of the country as non-rich white males.  Yet roughly 48% of the electorate was so dumb that they voted for Romney.  What of the other 13%?  That’s one out of every seven people that don’t fit your stereotype of a conservative.  That’s even adjusting for the fact that I exaggerated a bit here for the benefit of YOUR stereotype. 
I’m conservative and I’m not stupid, and by the way it only takes remedial knowledge to pick up some literature and read of Obama’s hypocrisy, it doesn’t take a genius to spot it…which is why possibly some people that don’t fit your definition of intelligent didn’t vote for the guy.  
I put a little thought into this post, but you’ll probably write ONE SENTENCE in response, like you just did up there and cite another article that YOU didn’t write.  And you’re the genius I suppose.

You do know that your source is a Libtard, fake study source out of the UK,right?

You must be an Atheist, a libtard or a moron?  My guess is that you’re all three.  

Bert, the study he’s referencing is a fake and the guy who conducted it has been banned from posting his studies in “Psychology Today” because of his racism and ignorant conclusions.

Landree is a Libtard moron.

I appreciate your scholarship here and I’m glad you took the time to deliver it to me.  After glancing at the link and reading about two paragraphs of it, I spotted the rhetorical hypocrisy immediately. I didn’t read on, and the reason is that you can never replace brain cells once you’ve lost them.

Sam, the study Lantree is referencing is a fake study from a guy who was banned from writing more fake studies and publishing them in the Scientific community. They both are Libtard morons.

I’m familiar with the author of the study, he’s a kook!

It’s simple. Conservatives these days are absurd. The stated goal was to obstruct. They’re not interested in what’s best for the country, just in preventing Obama and the Democrats from doing anything. They are unwilling to negotiate or compromise. So now, at the end of the week, the country is going to shoot itself in the foot, just so the Republicans can obstruct. Blocking Obama is now more important to them than the welfare of the USA.
And anyone with an education, like journalists, realizes this.

Those were sudo leftist candidates. Newt especially is a big gov’t RINO. Paul is terrorist simpothiser & Trump once ran for POTUS as Dem.

Nice try passin off your little editorial as fact.

You say it as if it is a bad thing. Switzerland is well-known for being liberal in all senses of the word yet they have more freedom, prosperity, and safety than the US. For those who say it is because their nation is small, so is their economy. Besides, there is no proof that nation size influences how well it is run. Good example: Nigeria. Small population, but it is a total hell hole. Being liberal isn’t bad, conservatives just make it out to be.

funny, when i watch tv, all i hear about is the national religion of america: consumerism. most of the utter nonsense that i hear every day comes from some propagandist on tv serving the consumer system. whatever message beck wants to get out there, at the end of the day his message is going to have to be acceptable to advertisers. so you will still have that big gap in information that never seems to get filled, that our consumer culture is at the root cause of most of our social ills. 

Haaaa loll you go sheeeple !

I love the way you sound, when you shut up, that is.

There are hundreds of channels that apply to be put onto the line ups of cable providers.
Glenn Beck’s phony little network doesn’t deserve to even be mentioned with many of the others that want the same thing.
Heck, Glenn Beck was fired from the “only” conservative network.
Glenn Beck is a phony dreamer who is losing money and is now getting desperate.
 

 You’re here…you must want to hear it.

Beck needs to get on Dish’s Top 200 from the current Top 250. His viewership will go even higher.

Yea, sure they are.  A look at the typical Democrat gathering (Occupy WS, name your radical group, name your free loader group, etc.) and compare it to a typical Republican group (Tea Party and other productive members of society) and tell me who has the stupid people in it.

. 
Sarah Palin, with the millions of faithful following she has could do that.
No one has the following Palin has. She has best time slot of all the speakers, March 16th at cpac/2013. Every one else has 10-15 minutes, she is the only one that has 20 minutes. She has the biggest and best stage, the ballroom holds thousands.
  ……………
Palin/2016 ~ After Allen West is fully vetted and comes out clean, he should be considered for Sarah’s VP     …No one has been vetted like Palin, 24,000 emails exposed, she comes out smelling like a ROSE…..No one would come out clean after that, not me, not you!
 
We all know the great Cruz from Texas will be in her administration.
Allen and Cruz will also be speakers at cpac..

.

Fox is no longer a conservative network ~ Ck out the people they just hired.
The reason stated by real clear politics or the dailly caller is. Sarah Palin left because she no longer agree with Fox. They wanted her to stay but her being true blue, said no…No one is going to tell her what not to say. She quit a six fig job as chair of the oil and gas commision because a coruption in the org.
..

I think they are just ticked that their many liberal media outlets can’t stand up against one Mormon and the tea party. It is really sad that they think they are smarter than conservatives when we are beating them with only two channels and the one only has one satellite outlet. They are craping themselves.

Beck : ”This is the hardest mental job I’ve ever had…” 
 comedy gold.

 truth has every thing to do with becks popularity. lefty’s should try it some time

That black strap, Is that where he keeps his guns.

I heard progressives started with a group that had large penises and wide mouths

If he ever gets on any of my channels, I’ll be sure to block this redneck.

 Louis dont worry he dont need you to get the truth out

Comcast is NBC i think you will never get through there Obama owns that channel

A real news network shouldn’t have any viewpoint liberal or conservative. If you really want to know what is happening in congress, turn off the news, and turn on CSPAN and watch it for yourself. As for Mr. Beck….. what is his favorite line….”repeat the lie, repeat the lie, repeat the lie, and soon people will start to believe it” FISH ON!!!!!! He’s got his viewers hook, line and sinker.

 what is his favorite line….

as much as i remember,he always said:
“dont trust me,research it yourself”

so far to your claim
….”repeat the lie, repeat the lie, repeat the line”

Another conservative obsessed with gay sex. What a shocker.

I recently changed to Dish for the Blaze channel. Comcast wouldn’t carry it. So now Comcast is one customer and 140.00 less each month.

It’s simple. Conservatives these days are absurd. The stated goal was to obstruct. They’re not interested in what’s best for the country, just in preventing Obama and the Democrats from doing anything. They are unwilling to negotiate or compromise. So now, at the end of the week, the country is going to shoot itself in the foot, just so the Republicans can obstruct. Blocking Obama is now more important to them than the welfare of the USA.
And anyone with an education, like journalists, realizes this.

Your post is of no intellectual significance.  You’ve made opinions with no root in reality and this took no research.  Here and now in this public forum you have the chance to redeem yourself by proving that any of your claims here are anything but baseless.  I believe that you are too lazy to do so, or you would have by now. 

If you paid attention, he was doing another segment with the holster on.  He was being demonstrative in that segment.  

While watching a Glenn Beck clip, have you ever actually done what he’s asked and “researched it for yourself?”  He is trying to tell you that he actually DOES go out and research on topics, and he’s encouraging all of his viewers to develop critical thinking skills via their own scholarship.  I’m not sure why you have a problem with this.  

Oh, and please tell me a specific lie that Glenn has told and the reliable source that shows that you are correct.  

Yes sir, and that’s why it’s just as bad to be far right as it is to be far left.  As long as you have the truth on your side, and you aren’t “advertising” anything to anybody, that’s all that counts regarding integrity.

Your musing is so rhetorical it answers itself.  You’d have to be an idiot to be one of Obama’s sheep!

I don’t readily believe those percentages because then how did Obama win so easily?

 Sure. That is why Fox News channel is the most popular, most often with more viewership than all your lefty channels combined.

At some point one by one media head will look at Barry Dunham…look at the real Barry Dunham’s handler and say what the…..chuck!  Because, Chuckie might SAY he loves America for votes but with good reporting of truth will bring exposure, as not, in Love with America, or her Media…       

When I called Charter Communications I had to talk to the video repair department.  Her English was not very good but I think she said she would send an email to the engineering department with my request.  I asked again if she was who I should talk to and she said yes but that I could not talk to anyone in the engineering department.  Hope it worked.

I receive this show on DISH. Why not encourage more people to support DISH? And give them a reason to carry the show and expand it to full screen and normal sound. I get a smaller screen and always have to crank up the volume to hear it. When I switch to another channel, I have to immediately turn down the sound. 

Lol. I give you substance, you give me a lame personal attack. Nothing to say about sequestration or purposeful obstructionism?

Palin? Is that the reality tv star who quit the job she was elected to do?

Wow. That’s a lot of insults. Are you Christian?

A scientific study is not editorial. Anyone can further the study to prove or disprove a theory. There are many of these studies of intelligence as it relates conservatives aversion to and liberal’s receptiveness of complex problems and the unknown.

That doesn’t make any sense. You must be a republican.

Well, the Occupy people are smart enough to know that Wall Street got away with fraud and they want justice. These crooks sold phony securities and brought our country to the edge of a deep depression. That makes more sense than the Tea Party Republican call for austerity that’s plunged Europe into a fiscal abyss. Tea Party congress screwed things up for Republicans.

Why are any Canadian comments not posted? Come on discus!

No, that sadly reflects the IQ of the average American.

More narcissistic than Limbaugh?

The study didn’t say conservatives are stupid. It asserted that liberals are more intelligent. The concept that conservatives are averse and liberals are receptive to complex solutions to problems is a theme repeated in psychological journals.

You just don’t get it do you, you’re still just basically saying to me,”I’m better than you.”

Still not an ounce of substance, at all…keep trying.

Because “conservatives” don’t really exist. It’s a myth created to keep citizens paranoid & blaming each other while rich people rip us off. Some people get jobs in the media trying to sell it on TV shows. But most people wise up & those talking heads wind up on web-sights, being outsmarted in a matter of seconds that it takes to post a comment… 

Yes, more narcissistic than Limbaugh.

Five brain cells ago, I read your baseless, intellectually insignificant rant here.

It’s called moral relativism.  Let’s try an example just to humor you. Is there a God?  It takes equal conviction to say yes as it is to say no.  If an atheist feels that there is no way to prove that there is a God, a Christian, Jew, Muslim, or anyone else who believes in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob may conversely conjecture that it takes equal conviction to say with certainty that there is NO God.  
A conservative Christian who’s studied the Bible, or anyone who’s studied Ayn Rand’s theory of objectivism, has a belief that there is a right and there is a wrong and there are absolute facts and absolute falsehoods.  Just read John Galt’s speech at the end of Atlas Shrugged or…anything in the Bible.  
If you come across a seeming contradiction, check your two premises, one of them is wrong.  
Liberals who adhere to moral relativism hold themselves to no moral standard and thereby act by no moral imperatives.  Thus, according to this mindset, there’s a convenient excuse to do anything, since there is no “religious” standard to adhere to.
But I have no idea what I’m talking about because you’re the genius since you are a liberal.

Very nicely said. I am so tired of being bashed and called a racist just because I am Conservative. I hold both the sitting president and the mainstream media for the nightmare we have in this country today. We are being lied to and purposefully mislead.  There will come a time when all these ‘journalists’ are going to regret lying and skewing the facts to favor the president.

The real fact of the matter is our government is corrupt. All sides of it.  The so called rich people that got all these tax breaks and special treatment did so becuase the lawmakers in this country passed laws favoring them. Our government has run on lobbying (bribery) for so long it’s insane. And the Democrats and Republicans are both guilty up to their eyeballs of this. 

Congress gets rich from insider trading and god knows what else. These lifetime politicians have just given themselves wonderful benefits and they don’t do anything except figure out ways to screw us.  They are having a great life at our expesnse.  Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Harry Reid are  5 prime examples of completely corrupt politicians. We should throw them all out of Washington.

Rich people paid the politicians to make the laws that favored them but the politicians passed the laws.  They are the guilty party. For Obama to blame average wealthy citizens is insane.  It’s the super rich like George Soros, The Wall Streeters, The rich oil execs, The union leaders.  It’s isn’t the people making 250K to a few million a year.  Why are Americans so gullible and why are we always looking for someone to blame?  Who honestly thinks that some guy that makes 500k a year has the power to influence Washington? I am sick that the American people turned on their fellow Americans like this. It is the government we should be looking at and blaming for all of this. It is their fault but ours too for letting the get away with it.

Yes I can see that Liberals are so much smarter.  Why just look at the economy all over Europe and the many failed past governments that were Liberal.  If they are so smart why did they all fail?

Palin was let go because it isn’t economically prudent to pay for nothing.
Palin has been exposed, over and over, to be lack the intelligence to lead or add to any real debate, so Fox decided to unload her like they did Glenn.

I sent Direct T.V my request plus my dissatisfaction with NBC using edited Audio and Videos to advance the liberal agenda. I know when beck was on the other networks he would show tou the unedited story and check to see for your self.  

Glenn, I love you bro.  Your new show, For the Record, needs a name change.  That has been the name of Molotov Mitchell’s weekly video series for over 7 years.  He is the little guy too.  Change the name please

LOL. Well, I tried.

That’s way too on the money for the likes of this site.

Moral relativism does not mean there is no moral standard. It just means that the standard changes based on the time or situation. 
There is still a moral imperative, but it comes naturally, from the individual and the situation.

You believe in moral absolutism because why? You read it in two books? If you’re getting the basis of your moral outlook from a couple books, there’s nothing absolute about it. You could just as easily have chosen two other books. Your choice of those particular books makes you, too, a moral relativist.

“Please note that I’ve made an abdication here, in admitting that someone can be smart and disagree with me at the same time.  That is something that is very rare among liberals.”

BFD, I can say the same thing, any reasonable person have. Do we really have to say that? Any other position would be absurd.
Guess what? Any generalization will be partly true and partly false. I don’t know one liberal who thinks ALL conservatives do anything, whether that’s tote guns, be racist, or whatever. Some do, some don’t. Can we move on to the issues?

Like sequestration?

You’re not a racist because you’re conservative. The poster who talked about Obama’s jungle mouth is a racist. Not because he’s conservative. But because of that comment.
Yes, the rich corrupt our government. Yes, they donate to both sides, but not equally. And if you look at which party protects them, it is clearly the Republicans. We are about to jump off a fiscal cliff because House Republicans refuse to restore the tax rates of the super rich. Pelosi isn’t doing that. Eric Cantor is.

You can become liberal, too.
But seriously, that’s not the claim. He’s just citing a study. That’s what the study says. Argue against it. That’s what we’re waiting for.

That was even more narcissistic Roman Emperor Nero hosting a Nero pride. You liberals are so full of smug that you would make Hitler look humble.

No. I’m jokingly answering Beck’s question by asserting that there are more liberal news organizations than conservative ones because of inherent psychological objectivism of liberals, which is a theory supported by numerous studies.

Mr. Beck, It’s al Jazeera English, not al Jazeera America. Facts are facts, buddy. 

I don’t understand why you think I’m narcissistic. I just posted the results of one of many studies on the subject of intelligence as it relates to political and religious convictions.

You need to go back to school and find out what communism really is. The cold war ended in the 1980′s. One person cannot change our government. 

The economy in Europe failed because of they took extreme austerity measures to curtail a global recession. The US, despite the calls of Tea Party Republicans, have take a more balanced approach to recovering from the global recession and the Wall Street crimes perpetrated on the American economy. Therefore, the US is one of the fastest recovering economies in the world.

Well I can tell you that I’m not an Atheist like you. Why did you post that stupid survey that’s been discredited by the scientific community?

My guess is that you’re a leftist moron sent here from Media Matters to put your lies and stupidity on display for all of us to laugh at.

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

Yea. I’m always amazed that more Americans aren’t as angry as the Occupy demonstrators that these big banks aren’t broken up and the heads of them and the investment firms aren’t in prison. Don’t forget to include the bond rating firms that were paid by the crooks to triple A rate their junk. Where are the Tea Partiers standing up for that?

…and there it is. The inevitable insults and paranoia over Media Matters that one would expect from Beck’s fans. If you can site a discrediting study, post it.

Nice sentence structure. There’s no paranoia here. I’ve seen you people come and go on this site. You post lies and put your stupidity on display for the amusement of the community.

I think you’re a laugh riot, stupid but funny.

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

Comcast is ignoring us , Send them emails : comcast_cares@comcast.com

If you think Beck cares about facts, you’re not paying attention to what he says.

“Did you know that 39 percent of the country identifies themselves as conservative….”
The problem is that people are not asked the right questions. People like Beck, Palin, Limbaugh, libertarians, A. Jones, S. Hannity and most of Beck’s followers are NOT conservative. They do not want to preserve the status quo; that is what conservatives want.

No, Mr. Beck wants to lead the U.S. back to the 19th Century. He’s been pretty explicit about this. That means that Beck is not a conservative.  Beck and people who follow him are REACTIONARIES. 

That 39% figure is pretty evenly divided between conservatives and reactionaries. That comes from the polls indicating that about 1/2 of conservatives support the tea party, and the tea party is very reactionary. 

So 20 % have Beck’s reactionary Blaze to reaffirm their false beliefs, and another 20% or so have Fox “News” to reaffirm their false beliefs.

The 23% who are liberal have MSNBC and Current TV while the moderates have CNN and the corporate-oriented, nationalistic sources (ABC, NBC and CBS). They have some liberal bias ans some conservative (not reactionary) bias.

Finally, Beck is not educated enough to mention the group of Americans that do not have any television news source. Radicals have to create their own news media.

When Dish Network accepted the Blaze, I cancelled my subscription and switched over to cable.

I’m not a moral relativist, THAT IS A PATENTLY FALSE WAY TO DESCRIBE ME!  I will tell you what I am and you will either accept it or live in denial of it.  I read about 2 books…a week!   Those are just the two best I’ve ever come across.  

Perhaps you’re right. Feel free to post a contradiction. Maybe you should consider these:

http://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/low-effort-thought-promotes-political-conservatism-2012.pdf

http://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/Where-Do-We-Draw-Our-Lines.pdf

http://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/Amodio_Neurocognitive_Correlates.pdf

http://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/the-secret-lives-of-liberals-and-conservatives-personality-profiles-interaction-styles-2008.pdf

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/intelligence-study-links-prejudice_n_1237796.html

http://pss.sagepub.com/content/23/2/187

http://reason.com/archives/2004/10/20/pathologizing-conservatism

http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/the-left-rolls-with-the-good-the-right-confronts-the-bad-physiology-and-cognition-in-politics.pdf

http://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/Dodd_Politics_of_Attention.pdf

More ignorant studies from morons. Anything from someone who’s not a die hard leftist? NO! I thought not.

It’s simple. Conservatives these days are absurd. The stated goal was to obstruct. They’re not interested in what’s best for the country, just in preventing Obama and the Democrats from doing anything. They are unwilling to negotiate or compromise. So now, at the end of the week, the country is going to shoot itself in the foot, just so the Republicans can obstruct. Blocking Obama is now more important to them than the welfare of the USA.
And anyone with an education, like journalists, realizes this.

Balderdash. Impeach Obama.

Conservatives lost both the media and the educational system to the left. And those two institutions are an absolute must if you want to influence the young. And if you DON’T want to reach the young, well, you’re giving yourself a short shelf life. As the GOP has found out.

It’s understandable how the right lost the media. The media is entertainment, and thus requires creativity and positivity. Republicans don’t do those things.

 For just one example, look at talking heads. The right has Beck, Limbaugh, Levin, Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, the late Brietbart…all people that deal in anger. 
Now look at left wing talking heads: Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Seth McFarlane (not a talking head but certainly an influential leftie) Bill Maher…all deal in COMEDY. 

Ever see a leftie try to do rage? It’s embarrassing. We can’t do it. We look silly pounding the desk and trying to sound intimidating. 
Same when the right tries to do humor. It’s painful to watch. They have no sense of irony, wit, or self-deprecation, so humor is beyond their abilities. People like Beck have TRIED to be funny…but dear me does it fail miserably. Remember when Fox News tried to launch their answer to the Daily Show? It was called the Half Hour News Hour…it lasted about six weeks. It was DREADFUL.

So the right is stuck with anger… even when they’re winning. There’s been times when the right controlled ALL levels of government and even THEN the right wing talking heads invented boogeymen or scenarios to rage at! 
Glenn was doing well on Fox News as long as he was throwing bombs at the president…but then he pulled out that chalkboard and started trying to be a history teacher and the executives at Fox were like, “No, no…that’s not our lane.” The suits at Fox News know that anger, and only anger, will work for their audience. 

Sure, all the peer reviewed studies are wrong and you’re the expert. That make perfect sense.

Every couple months a liberal moron like yourself posts these moronic studies from psychologists who are looking to make a name in the liberal community. Your first link was so far off the mark that other psychologists took him to the woodshed for his racist stupidity.

Read Joseph P. Simmons or some Thomas Kuhn on non factual conclusions in these studies. You should also read some Theodore Sterling on the same subject.

You’re a moron, I know how to read these studies, they are not new to me. Any study that bases peoples IQ on how they feel about Homosexuals or eye movement in a go/nogo study is just ignorant. A scientist with a supposition looking for subjects to prove their beliefs is not true science.

You’re an ignorant boob, go away with your fake science and leave us intelligent people alone.

Go think for yourself if you can. Psychology is what is known as a “Weak Science” made up of researchers opinions, nothing more.

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

It’s interesting how Beck and his fans consistently distrust media, science, government, climate change, academia, Hollywood, atheists, evolution, welfare programs… etc. Theme theme seems like frustrated psychological state to me.

You’re a moron. You’ll always be a moron. You post skewed research as fact and you don’t even read the research first. You’re one of the low IQ Libtards.

How long have you been a Bigot?

Please go away and stop bothering me with your ignorance.

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

Awe. You an angry little fella, aren’t you. Bless your heart.

Is that it? Is that all you’ve got? I’m not angry, I’m quite happy that I showed your attempt to insult a whole class of people in this country. I understand why you’re here, you liberals have been tagged with being low information people. Everyone already knows that by asking why liberals voted for Obama.

So you keep dodging my question, “How long have you been a bigot?”. Why don’t you answer the question?

Bless your ignorant little brain. You failed miserably.

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

I was a bigot for a couple hours in June 1997, then from 1 pm through approximately 3:45 pm on August 15, 2001. I may have been a bigot for a whole day yesterday because I kind of projected your halfwit posts onto all conservatives, but that’s just not fair.

When you declare a whole class of people as being inferior you’re a bigot. My guess is that you’ve been a bigot for most of your adult life, a couple of years or so.

Thanks for putting your ignorance on display and for letting me point it out for everyone to see.

Stay stupid, you’re good at it. OBTW, your anger is on display again. LMAO

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

“Glenn, Liberal news organization outnumber conservative ones because they’re smarter:”

You never read your own studies. Here’s the conclusions to your studies, (I’ll post it for others to see)

“Our findings suggest that conservative ways of thinking are
basic, normal, and perhaps natural. Motivational factors are
crucial determinants of ideology, aiding or correcting initial
responses depending on one’s goals, beliefs, and values. Our
perspective suggests that these initial and uncorrected
responses lean conservative.”

The study was conducted in a barroom and they didn’t think that drunks would skew their study.

“Notes
1. We did not expect alcohol to interfere with participants’ ability
to recognize and report their self-identification as liberal or
conservative. Instead, we expected complex judgments—attitudes
concerning political ideology—to be related to the disruption of
effortful thought”

Then they went to a High School for data.

“To test this alternative explanation, we analyzed responses of
8,888 nationally representative high school students (Johnston,
Bachman, O’Malley, & Schulenberg, 2006). In the 2006 data
sample, more than 70% of these respondents had had an alcoholic drink (“more than a few sips”). We correlated political
ideology with a measure of drinking, “On how many occasions
(if any) have you had alcoholic beverages to drink—more than
just a few sips during the last 12 months?” We found a negative
correlation between conservatism and alcohol intake, r = −.11,
p < .00001. Young adults have embarked on behavior patterns
that last well into their adulthood (Margulies et al., 1977), and
we find that conservatives are somewhat less likely to report
drinking alcohol, not more. These data undermine the argument
that the correlation in Study 1 is due to the greater likelihood of conservatives to imbibe; the population tendency seems to go in
the opposite direction.
3. One statistical outlier was removed from this analysis.
4. To argue as much would commit the logical fallacy of affirming
the consequent: If A then B ≠ if B then A (Cheng & Holyoak,
1985; Tidman & Kahane, 2003). Deliberative and thoughtful
political cognition might match efficient cognition (for some
conservatives), it might be more conservative (e.g., reactionaries, libertarians), it might be more liberal (e.g., moderates¸ liberals, progressives), and it might even be irrelevant. Efficient and
effortful responses matter, and both play a role in judgment,
thought, and goal-directed activity (Chaiken & Trope, 1999)."

WOW! This is the study that Landree is basing his ignorance on.

Have a nice day.

Let’s see if you try and get the last word.

Let’s see if you are as ignorant as we all know you are. It’s funny how you never try and defend the studies you use as proof of your bigotry.

Debunked!

LMAO

Your siting a minuscule fraction of information on the subject. Predictably, you don’t post anything that doesn’t support your point of view.

You don’t post anything that you have any knowledge of.

I’m siting the conclusions of the studies you linked to. You, well, you dwell in your land of liberal ignorance.

You posted a half dozen links but failed to read the studies you try to use to make your argument.

I’ll take my way of having a discussion over yours.

You’ve been debunked, libtard.

I’ll bet you’re listening to Shawn Hannity right now rant how Obama should halt spending that he’s unwilling to identify.

I’m at work. Sorry, you lose again. You’re a loser. I’m waiting for your defense of all those studies you linked to.

“Pisca mignato lontunis lr pasakykite det sataa.”

LMAO

The Blaze TV: the lies live there!

Repeat that lie over and over and over, and eventually, all the gullible reactionaries will believe it.

The study and the researcher has been debunked. His own people have banned him from posting such garbage.

It’s my understanding that your studies have been debunked as liberal garbage.

We’re fighting liberal idiots who want to over tax us, disarm us and destroy the Constitution of the United States.  We’re fighting you liberal idiots.

Your studies were debunked many times. You were taken to task by SoThere and were left whimpering and whining.

You mean the intelligent half of the nation.

Your study was disproved by SoThere.  He even posted the conclusion of the study that says you’re full of it. You failed to prove otherwise. 

I read the study Landree, it’s researcher was castigated for posting such a ridiculous  paper.  So much for your nonsense.

Are the Occupy nuts still around?

That’s funny, I found the same information on Kanazawa.  

No, that reflects the intelligence of conservatives.

None of which proves that liberals are more intelligent than conservatives.

Would you quote from the studies where they prove it or is it just the researchers opinion?

I’ve looked at a couple studies and they were opinions of liberal researchers not facts. I doubt they would get funding is they published a disparaging study about the liberal mindset.

Let’s see your proof about the studies.

Start with:

1. The demographics of those studied.

2. The ethnicity.

3. The financial background of the subjects.

4. The childhood rearing of the subjects.

Isn’t a simple IQ test a better way to determine who’s smarter, rather than a study of unknown subjects?

Put up Landree.  I’m curious to see what your facts are.

Great post! C’mon Landree, put your facts right here. Your bullshit is boring many of us.

I took a look at a couple of your links.  I didn’t see where they referenced any of these areas of intelligence in their studies:

Visual-spatial Intelligence
Verbal-linguistic Intelligence
Bodily-kinesthetic Intelligence
Logical-mathematical Intelligence
Interpersonal Intelligence
Musical Intelligence
Intra personal Intelligence
Naturalistic Intelligence
If they didn’t take these areas into consideration, how can their studies be valid?

Robert Sternberg,  defined intelligence this way, ”mental activity directed toward purposive adaptation to, selection and shaping of, real-world environments relevant to one’s life.”

Have you read any of Robert Sternberg’s writings?

According to Kendra Cherry, “While there has been considerable debate over the exact nature of intelligence, no definitive conceptualization has emerged. Today, psychologists often account for the many different theoretical viewpoints when discussing intelligence and acknowledge that this debate is ongoing.”

Are you intelligent enough to answer these questions or do you just post links and make accusations?

WOW sis, what a great job! I doubt he will answer you, he’s a libtard.

GREAT WORK! Luv ya.

How many times does this nonsense pop up from leftists?

Luv ya.

Every time the people find out how ignorant they are. When they feel threatened like Landree does. It’s a shame, isn’t it?

He turned out to be a typical liberal moron. I was expecting so much more from him. LOL

Have a good one. Luv ya.

Every few months one of you idiots brings up these ignorant studies. I read them, they all say the same garbage. They are written by people who start out with a conclusion and make their studies support it. Try reading Prof. Thomas Kuhn or Joseph P. Simmons on such studies.

Any study that asked people if they agree with Homosexuality and then make a conclusion about their IQ based on their answers is just moronic.

Does your employer know you’re wasting their money on this stupid forum, let alone this stupid conversation? At least I’m early-retired and not ripping my company off.

Sh-yawn Hannity is boring. He says the same thing every day, talks over his guests, rarely has anyone intelligent on his show, and NEVER has anyone intelligent on his show that disagrees with him because he knows he’ll look like an imbecile.

OK. There are many many more studies hypothesizing that conservatives adverse and liberals are receptive to complex issues. That’s a repeated conclusion regarding the psychology of politics and religion.

Really? Taxes are MUCH lower than historical levels. Under Obama, gun laws were lifted to allow concealed carry in national parks. A conservative judge on the Supreme Court voted the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional.

If conservatives represented half the nation, you would have won the election. You’re out numbered.

My point was that the so called liberal media outnumbers conservative media because they’re smarter. How do you explain it? Conspiracy? That’s the usual right wing come back.

I see that you’re preaching your silly study stuff again.  Please answer my post to you.

“I took a look at a couple of your links.  I didn’t see where they referenced any of these areas of intelligence in their studies:
Visual-spatial Intelligence (only once, gaze cuing)Verbal-linguistic Intelligence Bodily-kinesthetic IntelligenceLogical-mathematical IntelligenceInterpersonal IntelligenceMusical IntelligenceIntra personal IntelligenceNaturalistic IntelligenceIf they didn’t take these areas into consideration, how can their studies be valid?
Robert Sternberg,  defined intelligence this way, ”mental activity directed toward purposive adaptation to, selection and shaping of, real-world environments relevant to one’s life.”
Have you read any of Robert Sternberg’s writings?
According to Kendra Cherry, “While there has been considerable debate over the exact nature of intelligence, no definitive conceptualization has emerged. Today, psychologists often account for the many different theoretical viewpoints when discussing intelligence and acknowledge that this debate is ongoing.”
Are you intelligent enough to answer these questions or do you just post links and make accusations?”

I was waiting for you to explain your posts.  I’ll wait.

Of course. The paper, along with many others of similar conclusion, are controversial.

Some Occupy demonstrators are still fighting for the Wall Street crooks to be brought to justice, which is a worthy cause. They crashed our economy and we’re paying for it. Some states are finally making headway to put them behind bars, but its ten years late.

You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you? Please quote where in the studies it says anything of the sort. You have no idea, do you?

I’ll explain it to you seeing that you’re not that smart.

Half of the country didn’t vote for a liberal. Obama won by .6% of the vote. Liberals only account for 36% of the population. Is that better? Did I explain it in simpler enough terms for ya? Do you know anything?

Why are you avoiding me and MIB?  

It has more to do with what Journalists are taught in school and big money from the corporate liberal media.

Why does a major non liberal news organization get ten times the viewers than all the liberal media gets combined?

I posted the study to poke at Beck for asking one of his typically paranoid questions about the media. It seems to really have caused a stir. Anyway, there are no facts in psychological theory. There are merely attempts to explain patterns of thought and behavior. The general idea that conservatives are orderly and averse to complexities or abstractions while liberals are receptive to creative or new untested solutions that pose risks has been a repeated finding. According to a friend that’s an epistemologist, aptitude may not be different between the two types, but the depths to which creative types explore abstract thought is more a characteristic of liberal thinkers. Hence scientists, writers, artists, musicians, professors, researchers, etc., tend to be liberal.

I posted the study to poke at Beck for asking one of his typically paranoid questions about the media. It seems to really have caused a stir. Anyway, there are no facts concluded in psychological theory. There are merely attempts to explain patterns of thought and behavior. The general idea that conservatives are orderly and averse to complexities or abstractions while liberals are receptive to creative or new untested solutions that pose risks has been a repeated finding. According to a friend that’s an epistemologist, aptitude may not be different between the two types, but the depths to which creative types explore abstract thought is more a characteristic of liberal thinkers. Hence scientists, writers, artists, musicians, professors, researchers, etc., tend to be liberal.

It’s nice to see that you admit that all those studies that you used to make your point were full of shit. You should go and apologize to So There for your ignorance.

You’re saying that creative people can’t be conservative? You keep putting your foot in your mouth. Are you this dumb or are you putting me on?

“Hence scientists, writers, artists, musicians, professors, researchers, etc., tend to be liberal.”

Bullshit.

You’re full of it.

SoThere, Landree just admitted that he is full of shit.

A typical liberal.

I see it. He’s stupider than dirt, isn’t he?

LMAO Luv ya.

Funny stuff Landree.  You’re so ignorant it hurts the planet. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

You made my night!  LMFAO

Agreed. But I think you mean acceptance of homosexuality. If you gave 1000 people an IQ test, asked them about their political preferences and opinion about the morality of homosexuality, I’d guess the people that abjectly condemn homosexuality have a lower IQ.

Really? You think most Phds are conservatives? Most abstract artists are conservatives? Must fundamental scientists are conservatives? I’ve worked with these kinds of hyper abstract thinkers, and believe me, the ones I know couldn’t be bothered with the small mindedness of politicians.

Not really, there are a billion Muslims that would argue against your point and most religious people.  Are you saying that they all have low IQ’s?  Many liberal Blacks don’t condone homosexuality either.  Now are liberal Blacks all stupid with low IQ’s?

If they are then your original argument goes up in smoke.  You see how ignorant your theory is?

What study hare you quoting from now? Which hyper abstract thinkers? Most scientists are deeply involved in politics, it’s where their funding comes from in most cases.

You’re really not this dumb, are you?

I never said creative people can’t be conservative. I said they tend to be liberal.

Your facts come from where? Who has done a study on this, I’d like to read it?

Stated clearly, more than half the country voted against Republicans.

You have the little troll backed into a corner with that one. LMAO

So you think liberal corporations (sounds like an oxymoron) are shaping journalism curriculums to further their progressive agenda. Doesn’t that sound a tad paranoid?

Listen to conservative media. It’s fear based. It’s exciting. It’s good vs. evil. It’s ENTERTAINMENT! It’s more entertaining than just the news. Why do you think MSNBC responded to FOX with their own opposing versions of angry pundits. Ratings. It’s entertainment. It’s NOT real.

What you said was ” If conservatives represented half the nation, you would have won the election. You’re out numbered.”

Half the people didn’t even vote! Come on wake up! Liberals only consist of 32% of the country. Conservatives number about the same.

Your numbers are incorrect, you’re forgetting the Libertarian votes who voted against conservatives and liberals.

Obama just barely squeaked by, and with all the fraud that went on no one will really ever know how many votes were legal or not. Some precincts had 120% turn out (a mathematical impossibility without fraud being involved).

You don’t think that there are any corporations owned by liberals? Is that what you’re saying? Journalism schools are FULL of liberal professors with government money pouring in.

Obama preaching “Doom and Gloom” every day because he might have to cut 2 cents on the dollar of a 3 trillion dollar budget isn’t fear based politics.

I’m sorry, you’re just to dense for me, go somewhere else with your lame arguments and fake studies.

Nice try. LMAO

He’s just a typical Libtard, there’s no getting through their thick skulls.

They give stupidity a whole new meaning when they have succumbed to the Liberal propaganda.

Funny stuff watching you try though.

I know, really? I’m going to bed. C’ ya.

Me too. See ya.

Most of the brilliant scientists I’ve managed in my career of semiconductor material development would be thoroughly bored with popular politics. Fundamental science researchers typically loath the process of raising money.

Got me again. Over have the voters voted against Republicans.

You’ve managed? Come on now, you’ve managed?

Semiconductor research is “Fundamental research? You made a broad statement, back it up with facts or go away. You’ve been dancing around everyone’s posts all night.

Produce some facts or take a hike. You made the claim that liberal Blacks have low IQ’s, I want you to focus on that for awhile. You ignored that one and I would like to know why?

Where’d ya go little man?

The research is fairly fundamental involving experiments with doping compounds to change electron flow in intrinsic semiconductors. Much of the work was to gain basic understanding knowing the impracticality for engineering. My background is in engineering and finance and directed the company’s investment in R&D.

Now, what’s this about liberal Black and IQs? Sounds insulting.

The study was garbage, even his university banned him from posting such studies in the future.  His scientific peers called him on his bigotry and racism. There’s no arguing it, it’s speaks for itself.  Total garbage.

You made the comment that people who didn’t agree with homosexuality had low IQ’s. The response was that the majority of liberal Blacks are against homosexuality so you’re saying the majority of Blacks have low IQ’s. Explain yourself. What you said is more than insulting it’s racist!

Yes, of course there are some companies that have a liberal at the helm. Geez. Everything’s black and white with you. Typical right winger.

Yes, Obama’s doing the fear thing too and I think it’s sad. I’m no big Obama fan, but it’s not like we have much to choose from.

I said I “guess” the outcome. Where does the statistic about liberal Blacks come from?

No everything is black and white with you. You started by claiming all conservatives have low IQ’s. You can’t get more black and white with that statement.

They you said that people who didn’t agree with homosexuality had low IQ’s when Muslims, about a billion of them) don’t agree with homosexuality, neither do Liberal Blacks.

I’m with Maria, explain yourself. Are you racist?

US Today.Washington Post. Wikipedia. The New Black Magazine. The Huffy Post. The Black Baptist church.

There are more creative people on the left because they have so many liars!

I never claimed all conservatives have low IQs. I jokingly suggested to Beck that there’s more liberal media because they’re smarter. When pressed on what I really think, I was careful to say things like “tend to” or “I guess”. To make the generalizations you accuse me of is silly.

Good night Maria. I’ll see you later this week. You have a good rest before work tomorrow.

You certainly did. I read it in one of your posts earlier. Are you saying that you lied?

Hello. It’s really late, where did you go?

“No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.” Abraham Lincoln

Especially when it’s in print!

Good night liar. Bigot (you admitted to being a bigot) and now racist. Yup, all the traits of a Liberal on display tonight.

Good bye.

Let me clarify for you. I do not think all conservatives have low IQ. George Will, for example, is a smart conservative. Ann Coulter, on the other hand, is an idiot. I do think there is some truth to the general theory that conservatives tend to be averse and liberals receptive to complex or new solutions. I think what I’ve read about conservatives having stronger reactions in regions of the brain that are associated with fear could be true. I don’t think Republicans are very creative. They’ve been working from the same tired playbook for decades. They’re strategies are obvious and predictable making them outmaneuverable by Democrats.

More bullshit.

You’re dodging the racist statement you made.

You still owe SoThere an apology for your comments you made today. Are you liberal enough and man enough to do something like that?

We’ll see. Good night!

Apologizing to So There is none of your concern. I’m confident that if So There wants an apology, he’d request one. But I don’t get the impression that’s his style.

So you’re not man enough. Most liberal aren’t. I really didn’t expect it from you and you didn’t disappoint.

So you don’t know who SoThere is, you came up against someone with great moral character and wisdom.

I’d clue you in but you’re not the kind of person who should know about him.

Little men, little minds. I see them trolling here all the time. LOL

After two days and you still have no idea what my style is. You’re a TROLL, plain and simple and I emphasize the word simple. You’re a purveyor of lies and leftist talking points and i showed the people in this community what you really are.

Keep silent brother.

Did I guess incorrectly about your style? Are you saying you agree with Men_In_Black about his assumption of your style and that you really want an apology?

Did you read my last post to you? Was it in a foreign language?

You’re right. I don’t know So There from Adam. Are you some sort of agent for So There? Do you stick up for him regularly? People of great moral character and wisdom do not state their opening opinions with degradation and insults. You two present yourselves similarly that way and so do most aggravated Beck fans. At least So There might have a sense of humor.

We’re friends and so are many others on the Net. He helped many of us when we were in need. I’ll say no more because it’ll piss him off.

You asked for what you got, stop whining.

MIB

OK. I apologies that I offended all of your delicate sensitivities by my suggestion to Beck that the reason there are more liberal news media outlets is because they’re smarter than conservative ones such as FOX News, I mean FOX Entertainment.

That’s enough. He doesn’t need to know. Versteht mich?

He already seems pissed off.

Cut the crap, admit that your not man enough to be sincere, then take a hike.

I have no use for liars and bigots, that’s all little man. I’m a happy go lucky guy who cares for everyone, except maybe liars and bigots. Not my kind of people.

I’d like an apology for calling me a troll and an idiot and implying I’m less than a man and saying degrading generalizations about liberals. You didn’t even offer a study, valid or not, supporting your claim.

Right!

Who would like to line up and apologize to this little man who says that you’re all ignorant with low IQ’s? Anyone, anyone?

So you only care about certain kinds of people. I guess you’re not a Christian.

Oh well. No takers. I guess, to your point, you’re not “man” enough. Your tag line seems slightly misogynistic, though. Try this. Aren’t you woman enough?

Just got in for lunch, what did I miss? The putz is still here? What a funny little guy. Quick lunch and back to work. Take care ST, be gentle with this one, he looks like a whiner. LOL Luv ya.

You haven’t a clue!

I’m sure that would work for you, I mean the being “woman enough” whining part.

Folks, another liberal troll in our mist. This is what they are, people with little minds. What are they afraid of? LMAO

Have a great day, Luv ya.

About what? Being a Christian? Grew up Catholic in private Parochial grammar and high school. I know something about it.

WOW GIRLS, did you hear that? So There thinks all women are whiners. Step two, remove foot from mouth.

So you believe the Earth is flat and is only a few thousand years old? Interesting.

Just you.

I’d like to know what you have against religious Black people? You never quite explained yourself when you said they had low IQ’s.

Landree, I’d like to know what you have against religious Black people? You never quite explained yourself when you said they had low IQ’s.

WOW CHRISTIANS, did you hear that? So There thinks all Christians are ignorant about science. Step three: take the other foot out of your mouth.

I’ve never made any reference to religious black people.

You said that anyone who was against homosexuality had low IQ’s. Millions of Black Baptists are against homosexuality. They are also considered liberals.

Open mouth, insert foot.

I’ll ask you again, are you a racist as well as a bigot?

Your exact words Landree:

“Landree replied to Maria Sanchez
About what? Being a Christian? Grew up Catholic in private Parochial grammar and high school. I know something about it.”

So do you think that the Earth is flat, thousands of years old and you don’t believe in science?

Answer the question moron! It’s what Liberals believe and you’re a Liberal. It has nothing to do with me little boy. I rarely bring up my religious beliefs but it seems your religion is a hot topic with you!

Back to you calling religious Blacks people of low IQ’s.

I merely contemplated a correlation in a hypothetical experiment including 1000 random people between IQ and abject and extreme condemnation of homosexuality. The point was about respect for individuals in ignorance associated with rejection of people who behave differently. I made no mention of race whatsoever.

If you must know, I do not believe the earth is flat, nor do I believe in creationism. I believe science is the most enlightened pursuit of truth known to man.

Then you’re not a christian so why did you bring it up? You’re a moron.

So you admit that you’re a racist! When you group people together and make broad statements that are irrelevant and ignorant, you include all those Blacks. That’s not only bigotry, it’s also racist. So you admit to being a racist!

Here you go Landree, this is what you just spent 3 days spewing:

“Racism is usually defined as views, practices and actions reflecting the belief that humanity is divided into distinct biological groups called races and that members of a certain race share certain attributes which make that group as a whole less desirable, more desirable, inferior or superior.”

“Bigotry is the state of mind of a bigot: someone who, as a result of their prejudices, treats other people with hatred, contempt, and intolerance on the basis of a person’s race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, religion, language, socioeconomic status, or other status.” wiki

They define you to a “T”.

Go visit Victor Tiffany’s Bug site. (If you dare!) Victor hasn’t been getting any traffic to his bug site so he’s trying to trick people into thinking you’re going to “The Blaze TV” website.  Don’t be fooled by this morons Guest posting crap. 

Victor’s as dishonest as they come. The lies live there!Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha  

Go visit Victor Tiffany’s Bug site. (If you dare!) Victor hasn’t been getting any traffic to his bug site so he’s trying to trick people into thinking you’re going to “The Blaze TV” website.  Don’t be fooled by this morons Guest posting crap. 

Victor’s as dishonest as they come. The lies live there!Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha  

I’m happy that you cancelled your subscription of Dish Network, but you still can’t stay away from this website!  Why is that?  Why do you hide behind your “Guest” ID.  Are you ashamed of yourself or just addicted to our conservative ideas?

Chickenshit TROLLS are everywhere these days. What are they scared of?

I didn’t bring it up. Men_In_Black did. My religious beliefs or non-beliefs are irrelevant to this discussion.

Actually these are the broadcasts of Al Jazeera:

Al Jazeera New in English
Al Jazeera Live
Al Jazeera English Translation
Free Arabic TV Online
Al Jazeera News Live
Al Jazeera Online
Al Jazeera Television
Free Arabic TV ChannelsAl Jazeera News in EnglishAl Jazeera Live TVAl Jazeera T V Website in EnglishAl Jazeera Live TV ArabicLive Arabic TV ChannelAl Jazeera TV BroadcastAljazeera TV QatarFree Watch Live Arabic TV

Racism singles out a race. Including all races is not racism.

You didn’t post the facts either.  I did, look it up.

No, you brought it up in a post to Maria Sanchez.  What a liberal liar you are.  You do know that your posts are easy to look up, right?

They became relevant when you claimed I was not a Christian.  You’re a liar, a bigot and a racist.

Your first reference to being Christian:

“on Why are there so many liberal news networks and only one with a conservative viewpoint? 3 hours ago
So you only care about certain kinds of people. I guess you’re not a Christian.”Your next post to Maria Sanchez:“on Why are there so many liberal news networks and only one with a conservative viewpoint? 3 hours ago About what? Being a Christian? Grew up Catholic in private Parochial grammar and high school. I know something about it.”Are all Libtards liars, bigots and racists like you Landree?

No, you singled out Black Baptists as having low IQ’s. If you accuse One Black of being inferior, you’re a racist.

YUP, you’re a racist, no splitting hair when you’re a racist. Did you know that I’m not White little KKK racist boy?

I’ve had enough of your racism and bigotry for quite a while so take your atheist, racist, bigoted nonsense somewhere else.

I’m trying to enjoy a “Flor de Las Antillas Toro” cigar in peace.

Go try and whip a black man somewhere, I hope he kicks your ass.

Right on Brother. Sooner or later they all put their racism on display.

Sorry about before. I almost spilled the beans.

Right on Brother. Sooner or later they all put their racism on display.

Sorry about before. I almost spilled the beans.

No problem.

No problem.

Your message from Al Jazeera!

Beck made over 50 million dollars last year.  Here you are on his site giving him more money.  You leftists are scared of Beck, that’s why you’re here.

You’re scared.

I thought Victor was in jail. 

You make almost no sense.

OK, you’ve proven how nuts you really are. Time to ignore you.

Go away you racist, bigoted moron.

You’re a racist bigoted moron. It’s been spelled out in great detail. I’m not the one who has a problem here. It’s time for everyone to ignore you, except me, I’m going to be on your Racist ass every time you post on this website. It’s time for YOU to go.

Folks, in the past three days Landree showed that he’s a RACIST, a BIGOT and he thinks he can get away with calling people unintelligent because of their POLITICAL beliefs, their COLOR and their RELIGIOUS beliefs.

He’s what this country calls a LIBERAL.

Money talks, BS walks.  It’s all about the money.  Libtards love to take the peoples money and NBC/COMCAST are no different.

I’m nuts, you’re the one who spewing bigotry and hate. I, and many others have called you on it. Go away you Bigoted Racist.

 Tea Party and other conservatives want justice on financial criminals  too – they just don’t go all occupooper crazy like the OWS.

 It’s the asshole Victor.

 Blow it out yourrear Victor. You are full of shit as usual. Instead of posting crap try posting something that is intelligent  – oooh you can’t because you are Vicky<2 and are obsessed with Beck. 

 Victor, if you  think anyone cares about your lies or pays attention to what you say you are mistaken.

 If he’s not he should be.

Yes, the lies live where  Victor Tiffany’s anchor link  “the lies live there!” . takes you. That is guaranteed! He knows he can’t get anyone there by honestly posting the real link openly, he has to disguise it to trap people.

I figured. I caught the jerk trying to lure people over to his bug site earlier today. He’s a sick little moron.

OWS movement protests greed, corruption and undue influence of corporations on government. Tea Party movement protests taxes and government spending and strict adherence to the consitution. Both are worthy causes, however, I believe corruption and corporatocracy have had more detrimental effect our countries economic and social wellbeing.

The theory that lower taxes on the rich will trickle down has not born out. Taxes have been at historical lows for decades and have resulted in a rapid gap expansion between rich and middle class. The economy expanded more under Clinton with higher taxes and a government surplus. That’s not to say that taxes are beneficial to an economy, but that it historically has not proven to be a drag on the economy.

Everyone agrees spending is a big problem. The debate is whether government and the Fed should do what it can to drive the economy in a stable way as opposed to an austerity approach like Europe. So far the US strategy has stabilized the economy much more than Europe.

Maybe you have a bad impression of OWSers from the way they’ve been portrayed in the so called liberal media. Well, of course, there will be free riders that want their college tuition paid for for them, but that is far from the root cause of the movement. They stand for principals every American should, that is elimination of greed, corruption and corporate injustice on our country’s economy and government.

I just got the occupooper reference. Funny.

Worry about that bastion of freedom called India asshole.

So true.  so true.

 That guy doesn’t have a clue. He is a perfect example of how the left can take   not so intelligent people and mold their minds into Leftist Loons that will spout the leftist propaganda no matter what. They can’t oppose the leftist ideology because they  can’t think for themselves.

Yes he is a sick little SOB, Just keep an eye open for this idiot and warn people posting to his idiocy that he is the mentally ill obsessive delusional moron that he is so they don’t get caught up in his bulshit.

 Landree, you “just got the occupooper reference. Funny.”

Why does that not surprise me.

I have the other sicko posting to me again. He’s lonely.

The dopes will never cease. I am off to bed for now anyway, after checking in at TFC.

Probably because I forgot about that story and it had nothing to do with the principles of the protest.

LOL it was only used profusely on the forums…. and you didn’t see it…. yeah, right.

He’s baaaaack!

It isn’t about trickle down. The more you make the more they take. The taxes are not responsible for expansion between rich and middle class. You need to rethink that one.

“The economy expanded more under Clinton with higher taxes and a government surplus.” That is a fallacy spread by the left. Clinton did NOT have a surplus. Google it. The reason the economy was doing well temporarily was the “Dot Com” bubble, which burst , and the phony bolstering of the housing market because of the AHA pushed by Clinton, which was challenged by Bush & McCain, whose requests for revision were shot down by the Dems (Barney, Maxine, Chris) and bust under Bush.

Of course corruption and greed are a problem in government, and this administration is worse than most. Look at Obama’s campaign troops asking for $500,000 for the presidents ear. Look at all the lobbyists who bought him, even though he said he would be open, transparent, yada-yada. As far as the Fed stabilizing our economy? it hasn’t – it is all cosmetic. They are doing more harm than good as they are devaluing the dollar and it isn’t over yet. By the time Obama is done, the dollar will not be what the world trades on as it will be worthless. Everyone with a pension fund or 401K will be out of luck as they will be worthless for lack of being able to increase with the sky high inflation. Forget Social Security. Obama’s reassurance hasn’t prevented to cost at the supermarket to rise 25%-30%, that is thanks to the Fed (Obama & Bernanke printing $$$$$$ as fast as they can.) What will we do when no one will give us more loans in the future because our $ and credit are no good?

The OWS don’t have enough facts, reason or logic to see what the real problems are. It’s what we call ‘low information’ voters.

I don’t normally hang out at forums. Just while I’m recovering from an illness. Then back to work, no time for forums.

He’s a peeeeesssssttt! LOL

Is Politifact leftist?

http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2012/oct/29/tim-kaine/tim-kaine-says-bill-clinton-presided-over-biggest-/

Actually, yes it is.

Analysis of PolitiFact’s ratings:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PolitiFact.com

“PolitiFact is not that honest fact-checker.” ……”But liberals defend the organization.”….”PolitiFact pronounced…three claims Half True, False, and False, respectively. In each case, the fact-checkers dismissed the speaker’s claim, made up a different claim and checked that instead.”

“In considering all rulings where a claim is found untrue (False and Pants on Fire rulings combined), two things are obvious: First, that PolitiFact thinks Republicans are wrong far more often than Democrats and, second, when Republicans are wrong, they’re often said to be “lying”, while Democrats are “just mistaken.” [that shows a bias intent alone]

“PolitiFact started off straight. As a partnership of Congressional Quarterly and the Tampa Bay Times (then the St. Petersburg Times) formed in 2007, the outfit won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of the 2008 election. The partnership dissolved shortly after when The Poynnter Institute – the parent company of both outfits – sold off CQ.

The Florida journalists carried on alone, and their liberal tendencies became more obvious as the “Pants on Fire” rulings piled up on one side.”

“The 2011 Lie of the Year illustrates the problem with blaming “ignorant” Republicans for the one-sided results: PolitiFact is more interested in arguing politics than in running down one statistic or another. As the journalists there are more pundits than fact-checkers, their rulings tell you more about their political opinions than Republican accuracy.”

There are plenty of examples, explanations etc that can be found here:
http://www.humanevents.com/2012/08/30/politifact-bias-does-the-gop-tell-nine-times-more-lies-than-left-really/

…and
PolitiFact Peddles Politics from the Left, not Facts:
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/michaelfcannon/2011/12/27/politifact_peddles_politics_not_facts/page/full/
…and
PolitiFact Bias
http://www.politifactbias.com/

That politifact link does little/nothing for [the intent of] your argument.

The claim: Tim Kaine says Bill Clinton presided over “biggest” U.S. economic expansion since World War II [note it says "presided over" not "created"]. “Republican U.S. Senate candidate George Allen says he’s a better job creator than Tim Kaine, his Democrat opponent.” It goes on to explain the different measures of economic expansion. According to Economists the best measure is the average annual rate of real GDP growth in constant dollars. That put Clinton in third place, not first. Clinton came out on top of one, making the claim “mostly true”. But, it does not refute my claim as to what contributed so greatly to the economy at that time. Clinton had nothing to do with the Dot Com positive effect on the economy – he just happened to be in office at the right time before it burst.

Also, that link does not support your and the leftists claims that Clinton had a surplus. If Clinton had a surplus of $62.904 billion, why did the government borrow $1.395 trillion during that time which was passed on? As is usually the case in claims such as this, it has to do with Washington doublespeak and political smoke and mirrors. Fact; Clinton did NOT pass on a surplus to Bush, it was a debt..

The Myth of the Clinton Surplus, Part II
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/32
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/30
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/craigsteiner/2011/08/22/the_clinton_surplus_myth/page/full/

Clinton also passed on the time bombs related to the housing bubble and the derivatives.

He was the cause almost single handedly for the disaster to the economy once he was out of office that was all blamed on Bush. Clinton did create a housing bubble and bad mortgages with his pressure on the regulators/banks concerning the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), and worse he created and passed on the derivatives timebomb created by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (CFMA) of 2000. Bush tried to get Congress to do something about it in 2001:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM

CFMA officially ensured the deregulation of financial products known as over-the-counter derivatives. Clinton signed it into law on 12/21/2000. It clarified the law so that most over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions between “sophisticated parties” would not be regulated as “futures” under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 (CEA) or as “securities” under the federal securities laws. Instead, the major dealers of those products (banks and securities firms) would continue to have their dealings in OTC derivatives supervised by their federal regulators under general “safety and soundness” standards. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) desire to have “Functional regulation” of the market was also rejected. Instead, the CFTC would continue to do “entity-based supervision of OTC derivatives dealers.” {In other words, the bill assured bankers that they wouldn’t face any legal consequences in the United States when they manipulated, defrauded, and colluded their way to billions in profits using financial derivatives that no one understood). These derivatives, especially the credit default swaps, were at the heart of the financial crisis of 2008 and the subsequent 2008–2012 global recession. Thank you Bill Clinton for creating and passing on this economy killer..

John Podesta, the former Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from 1998 to 2001, called the deregulation of derivatives that occurred under the Clinton Administration a “big mistake” that significantly worsened the 2008 financial crisis in an interview with David Shuster at the DNC on Tuesday.

http://takeactionnews.com/2012/09/07/podesta-calls-deregulation-of-derivatives-a-big-mistake/

http://blog.littlesis.org/2010/12/21/celebrating-ten-years-of-derivatives-deregulation/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Modernization_Act_of_2000

That’s not what your profile shows… but that’s OK. I am not interested in carrying on this banter further.

We do agree on one thing. Deregulating derivatives was a HUGE mistake leaving the economy vulnerable to dangerous risks for which main street ultimately pays the price. Clinton has regretted his decision publically many times. But aren’t Republicans against government regulation of the financial markets?

No. It’s a matter of how.

Even me, my family and most of my friends (Hispanics) are so tired of the liberal media misleading the people, I wish FOXNEWS translate to Spanish, most of us stop watching CNN in Spanish and Univision, because we found the truth….about 90% of us understand the Agenda 21 of Obama (who is the leader of the New World Order) scary! The implant of the microship forced on all Americans if Obamacare is totally approved…yes we all be mark with 666

I read an article about what NAZI means; Nationalized Medicine….was the way Hitler mislead Germans, I do not remember the whole article, is that just look so much to what Obama is doing to America. The article helps to comprehend the monstrosity of Obamacare….a hungry wolf disguised as a lamb. Also this article is very important to read: Obama is waging a war against the U.S. and Israel by Caroline Glick.