You won’t be the same after watching this speech

Simon Sinek is a name you need to know. He’s a leadership expert, best-selling author, and speaker who teaches business leaders to inspire their customers and their employees. Over a year ago, Glenn read his book Start With Why, which radically influenced Glenn’s vision for his company.

In the months ahead, you’re going to probably hear Glenn talk a lot more about Simon as he works with him on different projects on and off television.

“I think we need to listen to this guy because he can help us define exactly what we’re trying to do and help us define our language so we can come together. I was telling him in an email that I think this audience will be the one that can really change things for the better, that we can actually change things for the better if we all stand together and we all are like-minded and in one accord,” Glenn said.

Be sure to set aside some time today to watch Simon’s TED Talk “How great leaders inspire action” below:

Transcript of the TED Talk is below:

How do you explain when things don’t go as we assume? Or better, how do you explain when others are able to achieve things that seem to defy all of the assumptions? For example: Why is Apple so innovative? Year after year, after year, after year, they’re more innovative than all their competition. And yet, they’re just a computer company. They’re just like everyone else. They have the same access to the same talent, the same agencies, the same consultants, the same media. Then why is it that they seem to have something different? Why is it that Martin Luther King led the Civil Rights Movement? He wasn’t the only man who suffered in a pre-civil rights America, and he certainly wasn’t the only great orator of the day. Why him? And why is it that the Wright brothers were able to figure out controlled, powered man flight when there were certainly other teams who were better qualified, better funded … and they didn’t achieve powered man flight, and the Wright brothers beat them to it. There’s something else at play here.

About three and a half years ago I made a discovery. And this discovery profoundly changed my view on how I thought the world worked, and it even profoundly changed the way in which I operate in it. As it turns out, there’s a pattern. As it turns out, all the great and inspiring leaders and organizations in the world — whether it’s Apple or Martin Luther King or the Wright brothers — they all think, act and communicate the exact same way. And it’s the complete opposite to everyone else. All I did was codify it, and it’s probably the world’s simplest idea. I call it the golden circle.

Why? How? What? This little idea explains why some organizations and some leaders are able to inspire where others aren’t. Let me define the terms really quickly. Every single person, every single organization on the planet knows what they do, 100 percent. Some know how they do it, whether you call it your differentiated value proposition or your proprietary process or your USP. But very, very few people or organizations know why they do what they do. And by “why” I don’t mean “to make a profit.” That’s a result. It’s always a result. By “why,” I mean: What’s your purpose? What’s your cause? What’s your belief? Why does your organization exist? Why do you get out of bed in the morning? And why should anyone care? Well, as a result, the way we think, the way we act, the way we communicate is from the outside in. It’s obvious. We go from the clearest thing to the fuzziest thing. But the inspired leaders and the inspired organizations — regardless of their size, regardless of their industry — all think, act and communicate from the inside out.

Let me give you an example. I use Apple because they’re easy to understand and everybody gets it. If Apple were like everyone else, a marketing message from them might sound like this: “We make great computers. They’re beautifully designed, simple to use and user friendly. Want to buy one?” “Meh.” And that’s how most of us communicate. That’s how most marketing is done, that’s how most sales is done and that’s how most of us communicate interpersonally. We say what we do, we say how we’re different or how we’re better and we expect some sort of a behavior, a purchase, a vote, something like that. Here’s our new law firm: We have the best lawyers with the biggest clients, we always perform for our clients who do business with us. Here’s our new car: It gets great gas mileage, it has leather seats, buy our car. But it’s uninspiring.

Here’s how Apple actually communicates. “Everything we do, we believe in challenging the status quo. We believe in thinking differently. The way we challenge the status quo is by making our products beautifully designed, simple to use and user friendly. We just happen to make great computers. Want to buy one?” Totally different right? You’re ready to buy a computer from me. All I did was reverse the order of the information. What it proves to us is that people don’t buy what you do; people buy why you do it. People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it.

This explains why every single person in this room is perfectly comfortable buying a computer from Apple. But we’re also perfectly comfortable buying an MP3 player from Apple, or a phone from Apple, or a DVR from Apple. But, as I said before, Apple’s just a computer company. There’s nothing that distinguishes them structurally from any of their competitors. Their competitors are all equally qualified to make all of these products. In fact, they tried. A few years ago, Gateway came out with flat screen TVs. They’re eminently qualified to make flat screen TVs. They’ve been making flat screen monitors for years. Nobody bought one. Dell came out with MP3 players and PDAs, and they make great quality products, and they can make perfectly well-designed products — and nobody bought one. In fact, talking about it now, we can’t even imagine buying an MP3 player from Dell. Why would you buy an MP3 player from a computer company? But we do it every day. People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it. The goal is not to do business with everybody who needs what you have. The goal is to do business with people who believe what you believe. Here’s the best part:

None of what I’m telling you is my opinion. It’s all grounded in the tenets of biology. Not psychology, biology. If you look at a cross-section of the human brain, looking from the top down, what you see is the human brain is actually broken into three major components that correlate perfectly with the golden circle. Our newest brain, our Homo sapien brain, our neocortex, corresponds with the “what” level. The neocortex is responsible for all of our rational and analytical thought and language. The middle two sections make up our limbic brains, and our limbic brains are responsible for all of our feelings, like trust and loyalty. It’s also responsible for all human behavior, all decision-making, and it has no capacity for language.

In other words, when we communicate from the outside in, yes, people can understand vast amounts of complicated information like features and benefits and facts and figures. It just doesn’t drive behavior. When we can communicate from the inside out, we’re talking directly to the part of the brain that controls behavior, and then we allow people to rationalize it with the tangible things we say and do. This is where gut decisions come from. You know, sometimes you can give somebody all the facts and figures, and they say, “I know what all the facts and details say, but it just doesn’t feel right.” Why would we use that verb, it doesn’t “feel” right? Because the part of the brain that controls decision-making doesn’t control language. And the best we can muster up is, “I don’t know. It just doesn’t feel right.” Or sometimes you say you’re leading with your heart, or you’re leading with your soul. Well, I hate to break it to you, those aren’t other body parts controlling your behavior. It’s all happening here in your limbic brain, the part of the brain that controls decision-making and not language.

But if you don’t know why you do what you do, and people respond to why you do what you do, then how will you ever get people to vote for you, or buy something from you, or, more importantly, be loyal and want to be a part of what it is that you do. Again, the goal is not just to sell to people who need what you have; the goal is to sell to people who believe what you believe. The goal is not just to hire people who need a job; it’s to hire people who believe what you believe. I always say that, you know, if you hire people just because they can do a job, they’ll work for your money, but if you hire people who believe what you believe, they’ll work for you with blood and sweat and tears. And nowhere else is there a better example of this than with the Wright brothers.

Most people don’t know about Samuel Pierpont Langley. And back in the early 20th century, the pursuit of powered man flight was like the dot com of the day. Everybody was trying it. And Samuel Pierpont Langley had, what we assume, to be the recipe for success. I mean, even now, you ask people, “Why did your product or why did your company fail?” and people always give you the same permutation of the same three things: under-capitalized, the wrong people, bad market conditions. It’s always the same three things, so let’s explore that. Samuel Pierpont Langley was given 50,000 dollars by the War Department to figure out this flying machine. Money was no problem. He held a seat at Harvard and worked at the Smithsonian and was extremely well-connected; he knew all the big minds of the day. He hired the best minds money could find and the market conditions were fantastic. The New York Times followed him around everywhere, and everyone was rooting for Langley. Then how come we’ve never heard of Samuel Pierpont Langley?

A few hundred miles away in Dayton Ohio, Orville and Wilbur Wright, they had none of what we consider to be the recipe for success. They had no money; they paid for their dream with the proceeds from their bicycle shop; not a single person on the Wright brothers’ team had a college education, not even Orville or Wilbur; and The New York Times followed them around nowhere. The difference was, Orville and Wilbur were driven by a cause, by a purpose, by a belief. They believed that if they could figure out this flying machine, it’ll change the course of the world. Samuel Pierpont Langley was different. He wanted to be rich, and he wanted to be famous. He was in pursuit of the result. He was in pursuit of the riches. And lo and behold, look what happened. The people who believed in the Wright brothers’ dream worked with them with blood and sweat and tears. The others just worked for the paycheck. And they tell stories of how every time the Wright brothers went out, they would have to take five sets of parts, because that’s how many times they would crash before they came in for supper.

And, eventually, on December 17th, 1903, the Wright brothers took flight, and no one was there to even experience it. We found out about it a few days later. And further proof that Langley was motivated by the wrong thing: The day the Wright brothers took flight, he quit. He could have said, “That’s an amazing discovery, guys, and I will improve upon your technology,” but he didn’t. He wasn’t first, he didn’t get rich, he didn’t get famous so he quit.

People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it. And if you talk about what you believe, you will attract those who believe what you believe. But why is it important to attract those who believe what you believe? Something called the law of diffusion of innovation, and if you don’t know the law, you definitely know the terminology. The first two and a half percent of our population are our innovators. The next 13 and a half percent of our population are our early adopters. The next 34 percent are your early majority, your late majority and your laggards. The only reason these people buy touch tone phones is because you can’t buy rotary phones anymore.


We all sit at various places at various times on this scale, but what the law of diffusion of innovation tells us is that if you want mass-market success or mass-market acceptance of an idea, you cannot have it until you achieve this tipping point between 15 and 18 percent market penetration, and then the system tips. And I love asking businesses, “What’s your conversion on new business?” And they love to tell you, “Oh, it’s about 10 percent,” proudly. Well, you can trip over 10 percent of the customers. We all have about 10 percent who just “get it.” That’s how we describe them, right? That’s like that gut feeling, “Oh, they just get it.” The problem is: How do you find the ones that get it before you’re doing business with them versus the ones who don’t get it? So it’s this here, this little gap that you have to close, as Jeffrey Moore calls it, “Crossing the Chasm” — because, you see, the early majority will not try something until someone else has tried it first. And these guys, the innovators and the early adopters, they’re comfortable making those gut decisions. They’re more comfortable making those intuitive decisions that are driven by what they believe about the world and not just what product is available.

These are the people who stood in line for six hours to buy an iPhone when they first came out, when you could have just walked into the store the next week and bought one off the shelf. These are the people who spent 40,000 dollars on flat screen TVs when they first came out, even though the technology was substandard. And, by the way, they didn’t do it because the technology was so great; they did it for themselves. It’s because they wanted to be first. People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it and what you do simply proves what you believe. In fact, people will do the things that prove what they believe. The reason that person bought the iPhone in the first six hours, stood in line for six hours, was because of what they believed about the world, and how they wanted everybody to see them: They were first. People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it.

So let me give you a famous example, a famous failure and a famous success of the law of diffusion of innovation. First, the famous failure. It’s a commercial example. As we said before, a second ago, the recipe for success is money and the right people and the right market conditions, right? You should have success then. Look at TiVo. From the time TiVo came out about eight or nine years ago to this current day, they are the single highest-quality product on the market, hands down, there is no dispute. They were extremely well-funded. Market conditions were fantastic. I mean, we use TiVo as verb. I TiVo stuff on my piece of junk Time Warner DVR all the time.

But TiVo’s a commercial failure. They’ve never made money. And when they went IPO, their stock was at about 30 or 40 dollars and then plummeted, and it’s never traded above 10. In fact, I don’t think it’s even traded above six, except for a couple of little spikes. Because you see, when TiVo launched their product they told us all what they had. They said, “We have a product that pauses live TV, skips commercials, rewinds live TV and memorizes your viewing habits without you even asking.” And the cynical majority said, “We don’t believe you. We don’t need it. We don’t like it. You’re scaring us.” What if they had said, “If you’re the kind of person who likes to have total control over every aspect of your life, boy, do we have a product for you. It pauses live TV, skips commercials, memorizes your viewing habits, etc., etc.” People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it, and what you do simply serves as the proof of what you believe.

Now let me give you a successful example of the law of diffusion of innovation. In the summer of 1963, 250,000 people showed up on the mall in Washington to hear Dr. King speak. They sent out no invitations, and there was no website to check the date. How do you do that? Well, Dr. King wasn’t the only man in America who was a great orator. He wasn’t the only man in America who suffered in a pre-civil rights America. In fact, some of his ideas were bad. But he had a gift. He didn’t go around telling people what needed to change in America. He went around and told people what he believed. “I believe, I believe, I believe,” he told people. And people who believed what he believed took his cause, and they made it their own, and they told people. And some of those people created structures to get the word out to even more people. And lo and behold, 250,000 people showed up on the right day at the right time to hear him speak.

How many of them showed up for him? Zero. They showed up for themselves. It’s what they believed about America that got them to travel in a bus for eight hours to stand in the sun in Washington in the middle of August. It’s what they believed, and it wasn’t about black versus white: 25 percent of the audience was white. Dr. King believed that there are two types of laws in this world: those that are made by a higher authority and those that are made by man. And not until all the laws that are made by man are consistent with the laws that are made by the higher authority will we live in a just world. It just so happened that the Civil Rights Movement was the perfect thing to help him bring his cause to life. We followed, not for him, but for ourselves. And, by the way, he gave the “I have a dream” speech, not the “I have a plan” speech.


Listen to politicians now, with their comprehensive 12-point plans. They’re not inspiring anybody. Because there are leaders and there are those who lead. Leaders hold a position of power or authority, but those who lead inspire us. Whether they’re individuals or organizations, we follow those who lead, not because we have to, but because we want to. We follow those who lead, not for them, but for ourselves. And it’s those who start with “why” that have the ability to inspire those around them or find others who inspire them.

Thank you very much.


  • ColoradoLH

    Powerful. Clarifies success vs. failure patterns in an simple way.

  • Anonymous

    When my daughter was little, if someone said something that she disagreed with (Like: No…we can’t go to the park today.) she would stone faced say “Why?” and then stand there and wait for an answer. She would say nothing more until she got an explanation. It made people very uncomfortable and they often didn’t have a reason to give her, so they either over spoke the answer or gave in to her. My husband and I have used this tactic since learning it from her. It works with incredible results. “Why” makes people stop in their tracks and I think it’s processed in another part of the brain. Remember this and use it. Just ask why. Nothing else. It’s a one word question and it gets answers.

    • Liberty For All

      perfect…..i must remember that 😉 Especially on liberals. oh yea

      • Anonymous

        You need to get out more.
        And make some new friends.
        And actually get to know some liberals.
        Talk politics and discover that liberals will be very happy to have a rational discussion. You just have to park your Glenn Beck imparted distortions of liberals at the door. And do your best to see them as just other human beings and not the monsters Glenn Beck makes them out to be.

        • Liberty For All

          Lots of liberals are nice human beings, but in this sense we are referring to their personality. I play music with a few and we have a blast.

          But dig a little deeper than personality, and you begin to understand that their primary view of the world is based on feelings, and good intentions. If you notice, liberals/progressives basically vote for personality, justified by their feelings.

          This is not a bad thing by itself, but when feelings and good intentions are disconnected from the laws of physics and cause and relative effect, otherwise knows as economics — otherwise known as physical reality, it is the cause of serious problems that effect everyone.

          While someone’s feelings makes no difference to me on its own, the actions they take to create laws that coerce others, to act in ways that in reality have a real negative economic effect of decline, and more so causing more problems, I do have a problem with, because I am being coerced by my liberal friends, by proxy through the government force they vote to increase.

          So while liberals/progressives can have great personalities, and may as well be very creative, and pretend to act as my equal, they are by proxy, coercing me to act against my natural right to act as I please, and what I see as better for me and my family and my country and mankind…which does not include the coercion of others.

          This is why liberals/progressives don’t like our constitution. It’s a document that’s suppose to restrict the state (progressives) and their ability to coerce individuals — by others feel good intentions brought forward by energizing superficial personalities, able to promote the cause of superficial issues, that when acted upon take us toward physical decline, while restricting individuals the ability to correct their life’s course.

          Glenn Beck on the other hand, does not want nor promote coercion. Quite the opposite. So what he does or what he says, makes no difference to me as he is free to speak.

          So are liberals/progressives monsters? Maybe they’re not monsters. Maybe they’re just not critical thinkers. And we know who we can blame for that, and also who runs that show don’t we? On purpose? Gnaw….can’t be.

          Maybe the everyday liberal or progressive is just splashing around in the ocean of life and calling it swimming, when in reality, they would sink, if they were not supporting themselves through the coercion of others, who actually do know how to swim in reality, and who are keeping their heads above water on their own — who are successfully swimming and creating a self supporting life without the coercion of others.

          Here, is where we have the real reason for plunder and the redistribution of others wealth (for good intentions of course)…to keep the so called good intentions afloat, while the few top progressives (on both sides of the isle) skim a good chunk of dough off the top, while the very same actions we take for good intentions, cause the physical decline we are experiencing. These two things cannot go on forever.

          It’s a good thing if life lessons of physical realities of coercion can be learned. But this struggle is not new, it’s age old, and why history repeats itself — we haven’t learned from the past. Why haven’t we learned? On purpose? Gnaw…can’t be.

          All it takes is putting feelings and labels aside for a moment, add some critical observation and then some basic critical thinking, and the answers become self evident. Freedom, liberty and individual responsibility: the ultimate life lesson.

  • Paul Ernest

    I remember seeing this TTalk a couple years ago… totally changed my way of thinking as a business owner and a service provider!

  • Semperfijeffb

    I disagree. The reason Apply and the USA do really good compared to others is because Apple or the US by the nature of the employees or citizens talents is forced to give more freedom to their employees or with America a free country. If apply switched today from a one or few people control they would fail in short order. The more people and the more you use the different talent they have the more successful you become as a group. The reason communist countries do poorly is few people tell everyone what to do. The more top down direction the less success you will have in any endeavor. The more this country moves toward top down control the less successful we will be. There is no way around it. The reason for any success in life is freedom. The one reason man has progressed over the past 250 years as much as it has compared to all the time before is the formation of a free people in America. The world is a much better place do to that one fact. As our freedoms go the more our success will go. World history is littered with top down failures.

    • Liberty For All

      Freedom is the “how”, but not the “why”.

  • DonkeyHoatie

    Overall, a very truthful presentation. But I disagree with the statement about brain function that the limbic system is “responsible for all human behavior, all decision-making, and it has no capacity for language.”

    If that was true, then our powers of reasoning and self-control (which are run by the prefrontal cortex) would not stop us from raping or murdering, or from buying every thing an advertisement tells us to buy. Our cognitive brains have been dumbed down by Madison Avenue, for certain, but they are still capable of overriding the limbic responses.

    • Anonymous

      Perhaps, but Why are you attracted to that particular man/woman across the room? You don’t say to yourself “Hmm, great eyes, symmetrical facial structure, perfect waist-to-hip ratio… I’m going to feel attraction.” It just happens.
      Much of what happens in the ‘cognitive brain’ is actually rationalization for doing/feeling/thinking what we do. There’s a non-trivial argument to be made that we are little more than automatons, controlled by our genes.
      And yes, often we can ‘override’ our limbic response with a considered thought, but not infrequently, to our detriment.

  • rambler

    Gee…… and business waste so much time, money and energy on consumer data collection to find out how to be one step ahead of the customer without ever understanding the customer at all.

  • Dave Posh

    When Simon described 1963 and the MLK speech on the mall, it reminded me of the summer of 2010 and “Restoring Honor” on the mall.

    • BlueMN

      LOL MLK has nothing in common with Beck. You were probably thinking of Goebbels winter of 1943 and “Total War” at the Sportpalast or GWB spring of 2003 and “Mission Accomplished” on the USS Lincoln instead.

  • Matt

    Simon Sinek graduated from my high school, and last year he gave an assembly at our school. He is an amazing speaker!

  • Keoni Noa

    Simon Sinek is great. Here he is in another recent clip talking about leadership! Awesome!

  • Ruth H

    This is the reason trying to “rationalize” God’s precepts does not work and no action is taken

  • Samuel Sung

    Expanding democratic processes can be achieved by increasing the number of persons eligible to vote, expanding the scope of issues determined by democratic methods, or both.

  • Jeff LaMonica

    Hey, Glenn… Any hope a conservative candidate might exist who embodies this? I see pieces of Ronald Reagan in this “start with why” approach.

  • Anonymous

    The whole speech is wonderful. TED always has great speakers and thank you, Glenn, for sharing these with the audience. The best part of this talk is where he reminds people Martin Luther King did a speech about his dream for America while Presidents talk about their plans for America.

  • Johnathan Read

    We all can learn so much from this.
    Fantastic speech.

  • Anonymous

    SO Stop the insanity become a keyboard warrior and share these free songs
    to fight the war of ideas between TYRANNICAL GODS WHO WANT TO RULE US

  • Mike Hokslong

    This explains the success of the Democrat party. All they do is communicate about how much they care, and people buy into whatever failed policy they enact because people can buy into the belief their hearts are in the right place, even though they might be out of their minds.

    • Liberty For All

      Yes MIke, which tells us part of the story is missing above. There’s more at play regarding physical results than feelings and believe…which are only brain functions. In the end Apple would fail like everyone else regardless of their feel good message, if their products did not deliver better value than competitors, as value is essentially determined by convenience, as convenience is essentially the savings of time and energy which is at the core of all winning action in the end, which tells you something about Democratic beliefs, and the negative physical result of the their actions, based on those beliefs.

    • Anonymous

      The Democrat Party. Is that a new political party.
      I know there is a Democratic Party.
      Do you have a problem calling them the Democratic Party.
      Some kind of weird cognitive breakdown you have?

    • Yoh Gah

      That’s a big part of it, no question. The vast majority of hominids in the world cannot reason, but all can feel emotion.

  • Liberty For All

    Feelings and beliefs are brain functions inside your mind, which are free to feel and believe anything, and then there is physical action, and the laws of physics, and the time/energy needed to design/create products, and then ultimately — value, which is the time/energy it saves us using those products. Connecting the marketing success (belief/feelings) of everything is surely a valid point, but fleeting, because in the end, beliefs do not determine the ultimate success of a product or movement. Apple continues to win because it has a more convenient product than others, the “why” message is great marketing and frosting on the cake.

    But I do understand why the “why” inside an organization produces more innovation. Once individuals understand the why, individuals can be given the freedom to innovate. This explains Microsoft’s decline as a leader too.

  • Liberty For All

    Simon…just listened to your video. You make valid points regarding the brain, and how to effect feelings of trust, in which you may be able to effect behavior, but ultimately, the why you talk about that effects feelings, will be tested against reality, with physical use of the product.

    Here, the product is judged against the laws of physics, as we are looking for convenience, and to save time and energy in most everything we do. This is as far as feelings and beliefs and great marketing can go and where the rubber meets the road.

    Buying a phone from a company that has a great “why” message, but also takes me twice as along to make a call and drops the other half my calls..etc…will ultimately lose over time to companies that have a lousy “why” message, but a great product, that truly saves time and which saves energy.

    Saving our time and our energy, is ultimately, the de facto goal of human action. Spending less time and energy, and getting the same result (paycheck…?), always wins the day. The evolution of the dial phone to the push button phone, is not from great marketing, but from which saved the most time.

    Saving time and energy is pleasurable, is it not? Otherwise called convenience, or a sale.

    But there’s a secondary benefit of saving time and energy, and getting the same for less, and that’s a net balance, of more time and more energy!!! Perhaps, that IS the pleasure.

  • IT 2 IT

    More ‘ANAL—ISIS’ —–and ‘Rule by EXPERTS’?
    as borders —-language —culture —–and sovereignty COLLAPSE?

    LOL- —NOT.

  • Charlene Weshley

    Within a vast impersonal civilization, competition is superior to cooperation because competition is a process of adaptation and discovery.

The 411 From Glenn

Sign up for Glenn’s newsletter

In five minutes or less, keep track of the most important news of the day.