Imagine a movie where the VILLAIN is a billionaire tech mogul who gives away free internet and wholeheartedly believes in global warming. Sounds like the kind of movie Hollywood would never produce, right? Well, if you’ve seen ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’, you’d know that the psychotic bad guy’s master plan involves wiping out huge chunks of the parasitic human race so Mother Nature can fix all the things people have done to the planet. But what’s scarier— the fictional villain or the progressives in real life who have wanted to reduce the human population for decades!
Stu breaks it down in the video below:
Below is a transcript of this segment:
I saw a movie this weekend that really every conservative should be talking about. Well, it’s a little old, bit still, you should talk about it anyway. It’s called Kingsman: The Secret Service. Before I go any further, I do want to warn you that there will be massive spoilers ahead, like probably the entire movie.
With that being said, Kingsman came out, I think, early this year, and honestly I didn’t pay attention to it. It’s kind of a comic book-y, superhero-y spy thing. It looked kind of good, but I didn’t really bother to go see it. I think it made $403 million worldwide, so it did pretty well. In fact, the movie did so well that Kingsman 2 has been greenlighted, which is pretty cool.
I just don’t understand how or why, not because it wasn’t good, because it was, but because it goes against every single successful Hollywood movie formula ever created. It was, I think, kind of conservative. Let’s look at these headlines. “Is Kingsman the most conservative comedy this century? “Satisfying stylized vengeance against the left-wing elite,” what? “The new spy thriller Kingsman is a hugely entertaining movie with ultra-weird politics.” Ultra-weird politics in Vox language, by the way, means the politics skew way less insane and to the right.
In the beginning of the film, we are introduced to the villain, Richmond Valentine. Watch.
[VIDEO from Kingsman]
Internet billionaire, kind of a weird villain, but sounds like kind of a great guy, right? Free calls, free Internet for everyone forever—that could be Obama’s next big catchphrase. I mean, it actually kind of is that now—net neutrality, high-speed connections for everyone, Obamaphones. It’s just not spelled out quite as neatly. But don’t get me wrong, Samuel L. Jackson’s character in Kingsman is not supposed to represent Obama. No, that’s clear when Richmond Valentine explains his plan.
[VIDEO from Kingsman]
Obama’s on board. It sure sounded and looked a lot like our Commander-in-Chief from the back. This little meeting wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the fact that Richmond Valentine is telling the mysterious Obama character that he has to go along with his master plan, which is, of course, to save humanity from climate change by means of mass extinction. You heard that right, the world-threatening villain of Kingsman is a climate change activist.
And this features a movie that is fictionalized in this scenario where Obama is complicit in mass genocide with a climate change activist. How did this movie get made? Listen to how Valentine explains why we need to kill people in order to save the lovely planet.
[VIDEO from Kingsman]
Seriously? He’d be playing Al Gore. It’s really frightening, isn’t it? When you realize that Richmond Valentine acknowledges that they aren’t even telling the truth about global warming—watch.
[VIDEO from Kingsman]
Carbon emissions are a red herring? This is in a movie? Richmond Valentine and Colin Firth’s character literally call carbon emissions a red herring. Again, how was this movie made? It’s really scary though. Samuel L. Jackson is just playing a psychotic character who firmly believes using global warming as an excuse for population control is the only way to save the world from disaster. At the end of the day, he’s Samuel L. Jackson, flying around on private jets, not caring about CO2 emissions really, and if he is, he sure isn’t thinking of killing people over them—at least I hope.
Real people with real status like scientist Paul Ehrlich have actually claimed that population control was the only answer in equally terrifying terms. Ehrlich once described how we need to put sterilization additives in our water system to prevent births. And like our Kingsman villain, he even admitted to using his spectacular scare tactics as a red herring.
VIDEO
Paul Ehrlich: If you asked me the question, are there things that I have written in the past that I wouldn’t write today, the answer is certainly yes, I’ve expressed more certainty because I was trying to bring people to get something done.
M: But his core message remains the same today. There are nearly 4,000,000,000 more people in the world, and they are consuming more resources than ever before.
Paul Ehrlich: I do not think my language is too apocalyptic in The Population Bomb. My language would be even more apocalyptic today. The idea that every woman should have as many babies as she wants is to me exactly the same kind of idea as everybody ought to be permitted to throw as much of their garbage into their neighbor’s backyard as they want.
I did apologize for Brad. I don’t think I lightened it up this segment. Samuel L. Jackson doesn’t terrify me. Maybe if I saw him walking down the street reciting Ezekiel and holding his “bad MF” wallet, I probably would pee my pants, sure, but it’s people like Paul Ehrlich and the progressive agenda that pushes climate change policy that really scares me. So, you can stay up late crying in the fetal position over the real villains in our lifetime or you can watch a very entertaining and very politically incorrect and very violent action movie about pretend ones, like Kingsman. I’ll go with the latter.
