How Hobby Lobby's Founder Turned $600 Into a Nationwide Retail Chain

David Green, founder of Hobby Lobby and author of the new book Giving It All Away…and Getting It All Back Again: The Way of Living Generously, joined Glenn in studio on Wednesday to talk about his amazing journey. He started Hobby Lobby in his garage with a $600 bank loan in the 1970s. Today, the chain has 600 stores nationwide and will soon have 10 million square feet of warehouse and office space.

Green shared with Glenn stories from when Hobby Lobby came close to bankruptcy in 1986, as well as winning the Supreme Court battle that challenged his company’s right to life beliefs in 2014: "God didn't want us to take life."

Listen to these segments from The Glenn Beck Program:

GLENN: David Green, founder of Hobby Lobby. Started with $600. Did you borrow $600?

DAVID: Well, yes. We borrowed the money. So we started with nothing, just the loan, took from the bank.

GLENN: Yeah, started with a 600-dollar loan. And you wanted to start making frames in your garage.

DAVID: Correct.

GLENN: And what happened?

DAVID: Well, my family helped -- my wife worked for the first five years for zero, and my two kids glued frames together for 7 cents a piece. And so that was in 1970. But by 1972, we opened up a Hobby Lobby store. The first was 300 square feet, which is about the size of a living room.

GLENN: Did you have any idea what was coming your way?

DAVID: None whatsoever. You know, we just took one day at a time and one brick at a time. I don't know that there was a moment that said, hey, we've made it.

GLENN: Yeah.

DAVID: So it's just been a constant growth for the 40-some-odd years.

GLENN: It's really you and Mr. -- what's the guy's name, who started Walmart? Walton.

Yeah, Sam Walton. It's really you and Sam Walton, who are the -- the big American success stories in brick-and-mortar business that have changed everything in brick and mortar in many ways. And you both had the same value system.

DAVID: Correct. Yes. Our whole value is -- is solid on the basis of the Scriptures, God's word. And so that's what gives us our foundation is just, we go back to that. We really don't think we have any wisdom outside of the wisdom we find in God's word.

GLENN: You wrote -- I think it was -- in reading the book, was it a Post-It note that you wrote to yourself. When things started to go well and you started to worry about, wow, I want to make sure I keep on the right track, you wrote a note to yourself.

DAVID: Well, one of the notes that I have -- and I don't know if that's what you're referring to is one that says, "I own Hobby Lobby, signed God."

GLENN: Yes, that's one.

DAVID: And even today, that's under the glass on mine. And so we know we don't own the business. Not because we say so. It's because God's word says so. He says he owns it all. So we literally believe that we do not own it, that we're only the stewards of what God has given us.

GLENN: So I have been up to Hobby Lobby. And I don't know if you give tours, like you gave to me and my wife. I have seen some incredible things. I've had -- I'm sure you probably have too. Have you been in the Vatican archives? The secret archives?

DAVID: No, we haven't. But we've shown our antiquities a couple times at the Vatican. But we haven't seen their archives.

GLENN: Oh, you -- you -- I've gone in, and you have to get a tour. It is unbelievable.

I will tell you, I've been to the secret archives in the Vatican. I've seen where they -- where they made the new Gregorian calendar. I am just as impressed with what you have in Hobby Lobby, going through and seeing your operation, mainly because I don't know how you've put together so many people that will hold on to the vision. They -- I mean, it is huge warehouse after -- I mean, bigger than football field warehouses, full of people. And it's consistent. And the people are consistent.

How do you do that?

DAVID: You know, we're blessed with an awful lot of great people. Right now, what you're talking about is we have 9 million square feet of warehouses and offices.

GLENN: 9 million.

DAVID: 9 million. And we're building the tenth. So we'll have 10 million after about 18 months.

GLENN: Were you with me, Pat? Did you go through that? Did any of you guys go through that with me?

PAT: Yeah, I was there. Yeah, it was incredible.

GLENN: It was one of the most incredible things I've ever seen.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I can't keep -- I have 80,000 square feet, and I can't keep it in order. I've got 300 employees and I don't know how to keep --

PAT: 9 million. That's incredible.

GLENN: How do you do that?

DAVID: I can't explain it, other than we just have a lot of great people that's in charge of so many different areas. So God has blessed us with a lot of great people.

GLENN: If you were giving -- I'm just using this as a therapy session. We could sell your book. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Whatever. I just want a free therapy session with you.

DAVID: Stay on track. Sell the book.

GLENN: Yeah. I am reading the book because that's the answer I'm looking for. And you are giving answers in this.

Explain how you go from a store in a garage --

DAVID: Uh-huh.

GLENN: -- that's rock solid because it's your familiar.

DAVID: Uh-huh.

GLENN: How many employees do you have now?

DAVID: We have 35,000 employees.

GLENN: How do you go from that -- I go into Hobby Lobby. Literally, I probably have purchased your car.

DAVID: Okay.

GLENN: I go into Hobby Lobby by my house all the time.

DAVID: Thank you.

GLENN: And everybody that works there has the same attitude. They're gracious. They're kind.

How do you keep that going, David?

DAVID: One of the things we do is we bring all the new hires in that are going to be leaders, and we talk to them and spend two days with them. And the key word we use is "serving." No one is being served. We are serving one another. We let our store managers know, we're there to serve them. They're not serving us.

GLENN: You talk in the book a little bit about this. You talk about the replacement for you. When you're looking for a replacement for you, you say there's three things that they have to have. Do you remember what those are?

DAVID: No, I don't. No, I'm sorry.

GLENN: Let me see if I can find them here. Towards the end of the book. You said, you have to have integrity.

DAVID: Okay.

GLENN: The attitude of a servant. And a thorough knowledge of the job.

DAVID: Exactly. Yes. And this is the kind of people that we have and employ. So we have people that -- there's no big. Egos. You know, you can smell ego a mile away. And so they're just a lot of servants. And we try to start that by being a servant ourself at the very top. And so this helps filter right down to the stores.

GLENN: And you -- and you are a servant to the people. You -- you have better health care than -- I mean, you take care of all of the employees.

DAVID: Our minimum wage is $15.70 for our full-time people. We have a clinic to take care of our people on the campus that have over 5,000 people. And we have an MRI machine that saves $1500 for an employee when they need it. So we do everything we can for the family. So if we're strong about family, we need to cough up and do whatever it takes. Like short hours. We're only open 66 hours a week, which is pretty much unheard of. Closed at 8 o'clock and Sundays. So we put a lot of emphasis on the family.

GLENN: You don't know this, but my welcome to Texas -- I was in Jerusalem. And we were moving to Texas. My wife went ahead -- and I was flying in from Jerusalem. And she said, "Welcome to Texas." She sent me a text with a picture of the sign that is in your door right here where -- right by where I live, that said, "We are closed on Sundays, so our employees can celebrate the Sabbath." And that was such culture shock from New York City, that that was my welcome to Texas sign.

DAVID: That's great. That's great.

GLENN: Yeah. You're also -- because you have really made it, unlike most people have made it, you're -- you've really worried about your kids. And you don't have to be -- I mean, you don't have to be a millionaire or -- I think you're probably a billionaire. You don't have to be wealthy like that to have that concern. We all have that concern.

Talk about some of the things that you write in the book about, you know, family and the poison of -- of wealth and the things that, you know -- the entitlement of being a Green.

DAVID: Right. No, this -- this gave me a lot of grief as far as what to do. And we had Christian leaders that would come and tell us to hand it down from one generation to another. But we see Hobby Lobby as a tree, a tree that's owned by God. Here again, not because I say so, but because God's word says so. So then if he owns it, then we're stewards. So we put all of the voting stock into 1 percent of the company, and we formed a trust that's a green stewardship trust. And we are only stewards.

There's no way that we can touch the company. We've all signed off that there's never can be a benefit of the company to us because we do not own it. So we only use the finance to do things that are kingdom -- kingdom ideas, such as the museum in Washington, DC, that we're going to be opening.

So my kids can't inherit anything. We give them opportunity to work, but there's nothing for them, in terms of wealth.

GLENN: David Green is the founder of Hobby Lobby. He has a new book, Giving It All Away and Getting it All Back Again.

I have a friend, Jon Huntsman, who he asked me for a donation to his cancer hospital. And I said, "I will do that, only if you will spend some time with me teaching me how to be charitable. I grew up in a poor family. It's a huge responsibility to have money."

And he smiled and he said, "Oh, I'll make that deal with you. I'll help you give your money away. You bet." And what he said to me was, "The first secret is, you have to care about everything." You know, his big thing is cancer. He said, "But it's about humanity. It's about all of it. You can't just care about the thing that affects you."

If you're teaching somebody how to give it all away, what's your advice?

DAVID: You know, what we do as a family. Because we come together once a month to decide on our giving. We have about 300 requests for finances every month.

And so what we do is we come together, and we try to focus on two things that's eternal. Because there's a lot of temporal things that you can put your money on. But we try to focus on God's word and man's soul. And so these things are the only two things that will last. So we feel good about where we put our money. And that's why we do a lot in terms of the Bible.

GLENN: Do you look at -- I had another friend who was a bishop of a church. And he said -- he spent a lot of time -- he was high up in Goldman Sachs.

And I said, "So tell me about giving. How do you give?" And he said, "Well, it might be my Goldman Sachs background." He said, "But I look at every dollar that I'm giving as an investment in people and an investment in whatever it is I'm trying to do." He said, "Who is going to take that dollar and give the most amount of that dollar directly to what I'm trying to do?"

Do you look at it as investments for God?

DAVID: Yes, I do. Because I think we can do all the things we need to do for humans. Like we feed hungry children. But it's always connected to the gospel. Because only feeding the children is a good thing, but it's not a great thing until you tell them about salvation and eternity.

GLENN: You can say Jesus Christ over here. We're not shy.

DAVID: And so that's -- we drill wells. But we don't drill wells with someone that is not taking it to the other step. Because getting good water is only temporarily. But telling them about eternal life by accepting Jesus Christ as their personal savior is eternal.

GLENN: So I have to tell you this, we -- this audience started something called Operation Underground Railroad. It's -- we're freeing kids in sex slavery and doing some amazing things all around the world. And it's all Christ-based -- centered. And I was just in Bangkok, and a monk that I met who is part of one of the shelters over in Bangkok, when we was opened the shelter, gave him the Scriptures. He was already doing these things. Gave him a copy of the Scriptures.

Just saw him and he said, "Okay. Don't tell any of the other monks or I'll be in trouble," he said, "But I'm a Christian." He said, "I read this book," and he said, "I'm using all these principles in the shelter." He said, "I don't think there's any way to healing without this."

And it was such a profound like lightbulb moment for him that he found this truth that is there.

DAVID: That's exactly right. I like that.

GLENN: Yeah.

DAVID: But you can do all the things that Christ has asked us to do for humans, but you can bring it alongside the death of our savior who died for and paid for our sins. You can pull it all together. And that's what we do.

GLENN: Okay. I want to come back and talk to David Green a little bit about the trouble that he went through with the Obama administration because he would not provide -- what were they saying? Just contraception. And I think it included abortion, did it not? Abortion pills.

DAVID: Yes. There was four drugs that would, we felt, without any question would be abortion. We -- we provided 16 contraceptives, but there was four that we could not do.

GLENN: And, of course, he's a hatemonger. And the family is, of course, against all women, including all the women in the family. And he faced probably one of the greatest battles, I think I've ever seen any business face. Somebody that says -- how many millions a day was it?

DAVID: 1.3 million a day. Because of the number of employees we had, it would have cost 1.3 a day.

GLENN: Okay. So they're fining him $1.3 million a day. Any other company would fold. They stood and took it all the way to the Supreme Court. And it was dicey. Didn't know how it was going to end. He'll tell a little bit of that story coming up in just a second. Again, the name of the book is Giving It All Away and Getting It All Back Again. David Green.

[break]

GLENN: With David Green, the founder of Hobby Lobby and the author of a new book I highly recommend, Giving It All Away and Getting It All Back Again.

When the government hammered you -- and I don't think -- I mean, have you found a case where somebody has been hammered as hard as you were as a company?

DAVID: Well, our principles, I don't think so.

GLENN: Yeah.

DAVID: Because they were just asking me to go completely against my principles.

GLENN: Yeah, they were asking you, pay for abortion or be shut down.

DAVID: Exactly.

GLENN: And they were fining you $1.3 million a day for how many days did that go on?

DAVID: Well, that would go forever. Now, it never got to that point because my insurance policy had not -- it was not completed before I had to go to the new insurance policy. But that's the amount that I would have had to pay, had I not have provided these four drugs that would really cause abortion.

GLENN: Right. So you were -- you sued the government. You took them to court, all the way to the Supreme Court.

Was there a moment at all that anyone around you said, "David, David, let's just -- I'm not saying that we do it, let's just look at this. What does this mean if we lose?"

DAVID: Yes. I had some. Lawyers. Different people that just thought that we probably shouldn't do this.

GLENN: Are they still with you?

DAVID: Not really.

(chuckling)

GLENN: Didn't think so.

DAVID: Actually none of my in-house lawyers. It was more of the out -- things that were not employed with us and knew who we were.

GLENN: And so there was no one who knew who you were that said -- so there was no doubt in the family's mind. Did you have a meeting with the family and say, "I mean, it's God's company. So we're not losing anything. But we could lose God's company on this?"

DAVID: We did bring our family together. I've got ten grandkids. My children, we were all there. Because we wanted to make sure we were united on this. Because we knew the news media would come in and they would just try to rip us apart.

GLENN: Rip you apart.

DAVID: But every one of them, in all the generations, the three generations, we were all united that this was not something that we could do. It was real easy from our standpoint. It was black and white. We either take life or we don't. So this issue is real, real solid and easy for us, that God did not want us to take life.

GLENN: The name of the book is Giving It All Away and Getting It All Back Again. David Green. He'll be joining me for a full hour tonight in The Vault with some pieces from the Bible Museum. More in a minute.

[break]

GLENN: We're with David Green. Giving It All Away and Getting It All Back Again.

This is the company -- his family runs Hobby Lobby and is -- is just this remarkable -- just truly remarkable family. Started with a loan of $600 back in the '70s. And now, you know, it's worth billions of dollars. And -- and they've done some remarkable things. They're going to open up the Bible Museum in Washington, DC. We'll get to that here in a second.

But you also took a stand against the Obama administration. And you were absolutely fearless.

Can you share one story with us that was either the high or the low of that? That whole ordeal. What do you take away?

When I say that, what comes to mind about that time period in your family's life?

DAVID: You know, I think the thing that came to mind at first was when we first knew that we were going to have pay for these drugs that would create abortion. I think there was no question about it, I lost a lot of sleep. Because my first thought was, you know, we can lose this company. Because we are going to take a stand. It's right to take a stand, regardless of what you lose. And we knew that that was the case.

GLENN: A lot of people would say -- now, this one is so extreme -- I mean, we've talked about this a lot.

I don't understand how the pro-choice people can say that we're awful people because we truly believe it's a baby. And if you truly believe it's a baby, then you automatically believe it's murder. And how could you not say something about that?

But you know that there are people in all walks of life that face something like this. Maybe not this extreme. That somebody will convince them or they'll even convince themselves, yeah, but if I lose it, then I have nothing and I won't be able to make any impact. I need to -- I need to be able to make an impact. So I'll compromise on this to be able to get that.

DAVID: Yeah, I just don't think there's ever a right time to do a wrong thing. And so this is what we decided. We were 100 percent sure that this was the wrong thing to do. And so we rested in that.

And the other thing that I think that I have to mention is we had so many that were praying for us. And it was their prayers that after the first initial thought that we were going to have to pay $1.3 million a day -- that left. And we were basically -- my wife and I were at total peace because we made the right decision. And whatever it be, it be. Because we had already given the company to God. We're not the owners, and we don't accept ourselves as the owners.

STU: What about the argument -- because we hear this a lot from people who go to Washington.

JEFFY: We sure do.

STU: You're doing so much good as a company. Here you are. You're a great pillar of the community all over the country. And if you don't -- maybe you should just give on this one issue because if you don't, you're going to ruin all the good that you're doing.

DAVID: I think it's when -- God blesses us when we pass the test. This was a test.

GLENN: I agree.

DAVID: And when you don't pass the test, that's when you don't have God's blessings. And so God knows if you're going to pass the test -- we all come to him every day. We have to pass the test, and this is one of -- of many tests. We've had tests about alcohol and subleasing a store to someone that was going to distribute alcohol. And we passed it up and paid another ten years on a lease. But that was a test. And I think when we pass those -- not that we do all the time. Hopefully we do, then I think that's when you see God's blessing in a country, in a family, in a business.

GLENN: It's the story of tithing. I mean, it's the story of your book. Giving It All Away and Getting It All Back Again. You pay your last dollar for tithing over food. And it -- you -- you will get it back. You will get it back. And then some.

It requires -- it's -- it's wonderful the way God works. God requires you to do your own homework and then have faith. And when you have faith, he'll give you more. And you'll grow bigger and you'll have more knowledge. And it will require more faith.

And then you're off to the races.

DAVID: Yes. When we tithe, the Bible just tells us, the windows of heaven will open up. And try me and see. So it seems like that if you don't, you don't believe in God's word. But we do believe God's word, when he says we don't own the company or that he's going to open the windows of heaven when you pay your tithes.

And then it also says, I do believe this book. And that's another test. Whether you pay tithes or not is one of the other tests.

GLENN: So, David, you started with your sons. Your son was making seven cents a frame when you started.

DAVID: Seven and 9-year-olds.

GLENN: Seven and 9-year-olds. They were there from the beginning of Hobby Lobby.

DAVID: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Your son -- does Steve -- he runs Hobby Lobby now, or is he running --

DAVID: I'm the CEO. He's the president. But he spends 20 percent of his time there. The other 80 percent, he's trying to get curriculum to put back into schools.

GLENN: Which is fantastic.

DAVID: We're going to try to put the Bible back in the school. We're working with ADF to make sure it's done in such a way that it can stay in there.

GLENN: Right.

DAVID: And then the other time is building the museum.

GLENN: And so are you doing most of your time at Hobby Lobby?

DAVID: I'm doing 97 percent of my time.

GLENN: Okay. At Hobby Lobby.

DAVID: The other 3 percent, I'm sitting here with you.

GLENN: What is your -- what is your son good at? Where has your son passed me as a man?

DAVID: Actually both of my sons are in ministry. Both of them are almost full-time, relative to the Bible. Their work is relative to the Bible. So God has taken them away from the business.

I have 35,000 employees. It doesn't have to be my family. It's God's -- it's -- it's a ministry. And we just want the very best person from it.

But it's pretty obvious my two sons will not be the one that replace me because they're doing things that's much more important.

GLENN: How -- how do you live in a world -- I try to make the case all the time that by taking care of your employees -- in fact, like you are, 15 percent. Or 15-dollar minimum wage. That's what, you know, the people at McDonald's are screaming for. Fifteen-dollar minimum wage. Et cetera, et cetera.

I keep making the case that when it comes to capitalism -- true capitalism, the more you help the workers that you have, the more you take care of them, the MRI machine. You know, I want -- you know, we're not big enough now. But when -- when and if God allows us to be big enough, I want to put medical health care here because the insurance we have is horrible and it's the best I can do.

But that helps me as a business too. Right now, capitalism is viewed and in many cases, it is -- it's executed as a dog-eat-dog, I will take it, I get it from you, it's mine, I hoard it, I stomp on other people. I have a -- I have some HR people we've just hired who when I told them about how I look at the company and how insurance, when we were interviewing them, they said, "Oh, my gosh, please, let us work here." Because they had said -- they had just gotten out of board meetings where the board of directors said, "Don't those people have like that Obama thing?" They were so far removed from the people, they were just like, dump them into the government system.

That's the worst thing you can do as a capitalist.

DAVID: Yeah. I think we have to here, again, go back to the word serve. I think this is what Christ would have us to do. He paid all. And somehow or another, we should have care for our people. And we need -- that should be our first motivation because it's just within our hearts to give and to be generous with what we have. But secondly, it's good for business. We found it's very good for business to care about our people.

GLENN: So explain that. Because I know you talk about that in the book. But explain this now in a way that a non-Christian -- somebody who is not rooted daily in the Bible and doesn't look at their business that way, explain this in the business world, how that pays off.

DAVID: It's still a great principle. The principles in the Bible are still good. Believe it or not.

GLENN: Right.

DAVID: You don't have to be a believer for this thing to work.

GLENN: Right.

DAVID: It just works that you care about people, then they're going to care about you. But you have to be true in it. You can't say one thing and do another.

I mean, the fact that we're closed most Sundays, 8 o'clock at night, only open 66 hours, says we're not just speaking it. We're doing it. We're telling them we care about you.

GLENN: We're telling you that we close as 8 o'clock, because at 8 o'clock, every mom and every father should be home with their family.

DAVID: Exactly. If I can have them -- and I'm telling them that their family is more important than Hobby Lobby. We tell them that. We want that to be in their hearts.

So if you're a non-believer, that still works. That if you care about your people -- and sometimes it -- that love comes from Christ, that you have for other people. Where do you get that? I'm not sure how strong that is if you don't know God's love for you. He paid his life for you.

And that same love as a Christian should extend to other people. And I care about your family. Well, what can I do for your family? I can pay you more. I can start you out more. Those are the things that come back to pay dividends.

GLENN: And in a society where everything is expected and everything is like, of course, you're going to do that, you should do that, you're rich, you should give that to me. I should have what you have -- how do you keep that balance of -- of giving and gratitude on both sides? How do you teach the employee to be a servant as well?

DAVID: I'm not really sure we do that real well. I'm working for that in my own life.

GLENN: Right.

DAVID: To have gratitude for what God has done. And I'm not really sure we do that. But hopefully, they can see our lives at the corporate office and what we're trying to do then. And hopefully, they will grab on to that idea.

GLENN: Quickly, I know that we're going to be filming something in The Vault today. I just got word that it's not going to air today. It's going to air in a couple of weeks.

But tell me about the Bible Museum, something you guys have been working on for years and opens in November.

DAVID: We're very excited about this book, as you can -- as you can well understand after our discussion today.

And we think it needs to be planted right there in Washington to see the seat of government.

GLENN: Right.

DAVID: This is where we came from. There's going to be a fly-through there, where you're going to be standing there and you're going to be -- actually think you're in an airplane. You know, because we're going to fly around and show you all the different Scriptures on all the different monuments -- monuments to show you where we came from.

GLENN: It's so important. Nobody believes it anymore.

DAVID: Yeah. But we're going to show you where we came from, just -- by this fly-through.

It's going to be three floors. One of them is going to be the history of this book, and the next one is going to be the story. This is the story from the beginning to the end.

GLENN: So great.

DAVID: It's a story. Not stories.

GLENN: And you have some of the best people in museums and in -- I mean, I almost want to say almost like Imagineering. The Disney Imagineering. You have some of the best storytellers on the planet.

DAVID: It is going to be very high-tech, and there's going to be things in there that could go exceed Disney in some areas.

And then the third floor is going to be the impact that this Bible has had. So those are the three floors. But there's going to be a lot of others. Banquet halls. Theaters. Things of that nature. So it's about a billion dollar project that we will have ready to go November the 17th.

GLENN: Unbelievable. David Green, the name of the book is Give It All Away and Get It -- and Getting It -- Getting It All Back Again. Giving It All Away and Getting It Back Again. Thank you. It's so good to you.

DAVID: You're welcome.

GLENN: Thank you.

When 'Abolish America' stops being symbolic

Al Drago / Stringer | Getty Images

Prosecutors stopped a New Year’s Eve bombing plot rooted in ideology that treats the US as an enemy to be destroyed.

Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles announced that four members of an anti-capitalist extremist group were arrested on Friday for plotting coordinated bombings in California on New Year’s Eve.

According to the Department of Justice, the suspects planned to detonate explosives concealed in backpacks at various businesses while also targeting ICE agents and vehicles. The attacks were supposed to coincide with midnight celebrations.

Marxists, anarchists, and Islamist movements share a conviction that the United States, like Israel, is a colonial project that must be destroyed.

The plot was disrupted before any lives were lost. The group behind the plot calls itself the Turtle Island Liberation Front. That name matters more than you might think.

When ideology turns operational

For years, the media has told us that radical, violent rhetoric on the left is mostly symbolic. They explained away the angry slogans, destructive language, and calls for “liberation” as performance or hyperbole.

Bombs are not metaphors, however.

Once explosives enter the picture, framing the issue as harmless expression becomes much more difficult. What makes this case different is the ideological ecosystem behind it.

The Turtle Island Liberation Front was not a single-issue group. It was anti-American, anti-capitalist, and explicitly revolutionary. Its members viewed the United States as an illegitimate occupying force rather than a sovereign nation. America, in their view, is not a nation, not a country; it is a structure that must be dismantled at any cost.

What ‘Turtle Island’ really means

“Turtle Island” is not an innocent cultural reference. In modern activist usage, it is shorthand for the claim that the United States has no moral or legal right to exist. It reframes the country as stolen land, permanently occupied by an illegitimate society.

Once people accept that premise, the use of violence against their perceived enemies becomes not only permissible, but virtuous. That framing is not unique to one movement. It appears again and again across radical networks that otherwise disagree on nearly everything.

Marxists, anarchists, and Islamist movements do not share the same vision for the future. They do not even trust one another. But they share a conviction that the United States, like Israel, is a colonial project that must be destroyed. The alignment of radical, hostile ideologies is anything but a coincidence.

The red-green alliance

For decades, analysts have warned about what is often called the red-green alliance: the convergence of far-left revolutionary politics with Islamist movements. The alliance is not based on shared values, but on shared enemies. Capitalism, national sovereignty, Western culture, and constitutional government all fall into that category.

History has shown us how this process works. Revolutionary coalitions form to tear down an existing order, promising liberation and justice. Once power is seized, the alliance fractures, and the most ruthless faction takes control.

Iran’s 1979 revolution followed this exact pattern. Leftist revolutionaries helped topple the shah. Within a few years, tens of thousands of them were imprisoned, executed, or “disappeared” by the Islamist regime they helped install. Those who do not understand history, the saying goes, are doomed to repeat it.

ALEX WROBLEWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

This moment is different

What happened in California was not a foreign conflict bleeding into the United States or a solitary extremist acting on impulse. It was an organized domestic group, steeped in ideological narratives long validated by universities, activist networks, and the media.

The language that once circulated on campuses and social media is now appearing in criminal indictments. “Liberation” has become a justification for explosives. “Resistance” has become a plan with a date and a time. When groups openly call for the destruction of the United States and then prepare bombs to make it happen, the country has entered a new phase. Pretending things have not gotten worse, that we have not crossed a line as a country, is reckless denial.

Every movement like this depends on confusion. Its supporters insist that calls for America’s destruction are symbolic, even as they stockpile weapons. They denounce violence while preparing for it. They cloak criminal intent in the language of justice and morality. That ambiguity is not accidental. It is deliberate.

The California plot should end the debate over whether these red-green alliances exist. They do. The only question left is whether the country will recognize the pattern before more plots advance farther — and succeed.

This is not about one group, one ideology, or one arrest. It is about a growing coalition that has moved past rhetoric and into action. History leaves no doubt where that path leads. The only uncertainty is whether Americans will step in and stop it.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Trump v. Slaughter: The Deep State on trial

JIM WATSON / Contributor | Getty Images

The administrative state has long operated as an unelected super-government. Trump v. Slaughter may be the moment voters reclaim authority over their own institutions.

Washington is watching and worrying about a U.S. Supreme Court case that could very well define the future of American self-government. And I don’t say that lightly. At the center of Trump v. Slaughter is a deceptively simple question: Can the president — the one official chosen by the entire nation — remove the administrators and “experts” who wield enormous, unaccountable power inside the executive branch?

This isn’t a technical fight. It’s not a paperwork dispute. It’s a turning point. Because if the answer is no, then the American people no longer control their own government. Elections become ceremonial. The bureaucracy becomes permanent. And the Constitution becomes a suggestion rather than the law of the land.

A government run by experts instead of elected leaders is not a republic. It’s a bureaucracy with a voting booth bolted onto the front to make us feel better.

That simply cannot be. Justice Neil Gorsuch summed it up perfectly during oral arguments on Monday: “There is no such thing in our constitutional order as a fourth branch of government that’s quasi-judicial and quasi-legislative.”

Yet for more than a century, the administrative state has grown like kudzu — quietly, relentlessly, and always in one direction. Today we have a fourth branch of government: unelected, unaccountable, insulated from consequence. Congress hands off lawmaking to agencies. Presidents arrive with agendas, but the bureaucrats remain, and they decide what actually gets done.

If the Supreme Court decides that presidents cannot fire the very people who execute federal power, they are not just rearranging an org chart. The justices are rewriting the structure of the republic. They are confirming what we’ve long feared: Here, the experts rule, not the voters.

A government run by experts instead of elected leaders is not a republic. It’s a bureaucracy with a voting booth bolted onto the front to make us feel better.

The founders warned us

The men who wrote the Constitution saw this temptation coming. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison in the Federalist Papers hammered home the same principle again and again: Power must remain traceable to the people. They understood human nature far too well. They knew that once administrators are protected from accountability, they will accumulate power endlessly. It is what humans do.

That’s why the Constitution vests the executive power in a single president — someone the entire nation elects and can unelect. They did not want a managerial council. They did not want a permanent priesthood of experts. They wanted responsibility and authority to live in one place so the people could reward or replace it.

So this case will answer a simple question: Do the people still govern this country, or does a protected class of bureaucrats now run the show?

Not-so-expert advice

Look around. The experts insisted they could manage the economy — and produced historic debt and inflation.

The experts insisted they could run public health — and left millions of Americans sick, injured, and dead while avoiding accountability.

The experts insisted they could steer foreign policy — and delivered endless conflict with no measurable benefit to our citizens.

And through it all, they stayed. Untouched, unelected, and utterly unapologetic.

If a president cannot fire these people, then you — the voter — have no ability to change the direction of your own government. You can vote for reform, but you will get the same insiders making the same decisions in the same agencies.

That is not self-government. That is inertia disguised as expertise.

A republic no more?

A monarchy can survive a permanent bureaucracy. A dictatorship can survive a permanent bureaucracy. A constitutional republic cannot. Not for long anyway.

We are supposed to live in a system where the people set the course, Congress writes the laws, and the president carries them out. When agencies write their own rules, judges shield them from oversight, and presidents are forbidden from removing them, we no longer live in that system. We live in something else — something the founders warned us about.

And the people become spectators of their own government.

JIM WATSON / Contributor | Getty Images

The path forward

Restoring the separation of powers does not mean rejecting expertise. It means returning expertise to its proper role: advisory, not sovereign.

No expert should hold power that voters cannot revoke. No agency should drift beyond the reach of the executive. No bureaucracy should be allowed to grow branches the Constitution never gave it.

The Supreme Court now faces a choice that will shape American life for a generation. It can reinforce the Constitution, or it can allow the administrative state to wander even farther from democratic control.

This case isn’t about President Trump. It isn’t about Rebecca Slaughter, the former Federal Trade Commission official suing to get her job back. It’s about whether elections still mean anything — whether the American people still hold the reins of their own government.

That is what is at stake: not procedure, not technicalities, but the survival of a system built on the revolutionary idea that the citizens — not the experts — are the ones who rule.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

1 in 20 Canadians die by MAID—Is this 'compassion'?

Vaughn Ridley / Stringer | Getty Images

Medical assistance in dying isn’t health care. It’s the moment a Western democracy decided some lives aren’t worth saving, and it’s a warning sign we can’t ignore.

Canada loves to lecture America about compassion. Every time a shooting makes the headlines, Canadian commentators cannot wait to discuss how the United States has a “culture of death” because we refuse to regulate guns the way enlightened nations supposedly do.

But north of our border, a very different crisis is unfolding — one that is harder to moralize because it exposes a deeper cultural failure.

A society that no longer recognizes the value of life will not long defend freedom, dignity, or moral order.

The Canadian government is not only permitting death, but it’s also administering, expanding, and redefining it as “medical care.” Medical assistance in dying is no longer a rare, tragic exception. It has become one of the country’s leading causes of death, offered to people whose problems are treatable, whose conditions are survivable, and whose value should never have been in question.

In Canada, MAID is now responsible for nearly 5% of all deaths — 1 out of every 20 citizens. And this is happening in a country that claims the moral high ground over American gun violence. Canada now records more deaths per capita from doctors administering lethal drugs than America records from firearms. Their number is 37.9 deaths per 100,000 people. Ours is 13.7. Yet we are the country supposedly drowning in a “culture of death.”

No lecture from abroad can paper over this fact: Canada has built a system where eliminating suffering increasingly means eliminating the sufferer.

Choosing death over care

One example of what Canada now calls “compassion” is the case of Jolene Bond, a woman suffering from a painful but treatable thyroid condition that causes dangerously high calcium levels, bone deterioration, soft-tissue damage, nausea, and unrelenting pain. Her condition is severe, but it is not terminal. Surgery could help her. And in a functioning medical system, she would have it.

But Jolene lives under socialized medicine. The specialists she needs are either unavailable, overrun with patients, or blocked behind bureaucratic requirements she cannot meet. She cannot get a referral. She cannot get an appointment. She cannot reach the doctor in another province who is qualified to perform the operation. Every pathway to treatment is jammed by paperwork, shortages, and waitlists that stretch into the horizon and beyond.

Yet the Canadian government had something else ready for her — something immediate.

They offered her MAID.

Not help, not relief, not a doctor willing to drive across a provincial line and simply examine her. Instead, Canada offered Jolene a state-approved death. A lethal injection is easier to obtain than a medical referral. Killing her would be easier than treating her. And the system calls that compassion.

Bureaucracy replaces medicine

Jolene’s story is not an outlier. It is the logical outcome of a system that cannot keep its promises. When the machinery of socialized medicine breaks down, the state simply replaces care with a final, irreversible “solution.” A bureaucratic checkbox becomes the last decision of a person’s life.

Canada insists its process is rigorous, humane, and safeguarded. Yet the bureaucracy now reviewing Jolene’s case is not asking how she can receive treatment; it is asking whether she has enough signatures to qualify for a lethal injection. And the debate among Canadian officials is not how to preserve life, but whether she has met the paperwork threshold to end it.

This is the dark inversion that always emerges when the state claims the power to decide when life is no longer worth living. Bureaucracy replaces conscience. Eligibility criteria replace compassion. A panel of physicians replaces the family gathered at a bedside. And eventually, the “right” to die becomes an expectation — especially for those who are poor, elderly, or alone.

Joe Raedle / Staff | Getty Images

The logical end of a broken system

We ignore this lesson at our own peril. Canada’s health care system is collapsing under demographic pressure, uncontrolled migration, and the unavoidable math of government-run medicine.

When the system breaks, someone must bear the cost. MAID has become the release valve.

The ideology behind this system is already drifting south. In American medical journals and bioethics conferences, you will hear this same rhetoric. The argument is always dressed in compassion. But underneath, it reduces the value of human life to a calculation: Are you useful? Are you affordable? Are you too much of a burden?

The West was built on a conviction that every human life has inherent value. That truth gave us hospitals before it gave us universities. It gave us charity before it gave us science. It is written into the Declaration of Independence.

Canada’s MAID program reveals what happens when a country lets that foundation erode. Life becomes negotiable, and suffering becomes a justification for elimination.

A society that no longer recognizes the value of life will not long defend freedom, dignity, or moral order. If compassion becomes indistinguishable from convenience, and if medicine becomes indistinguishable from euthanasia, the West will have abandoned the very principles that built it. That is the lesson from our northern neighbor — a warning, not a blueprint.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

A Sharia enclave is quietly taking root in America. It's time to wake up.

NOVA SAFO / Staff | Getty Images

Sharia-based projects like the Meadow in Texas show how political Islam grows quietly, counting on Americans to stay silent while an incompatible legal system takes root.

Apolitical system completely incompatible with the Constitution is gaining ground in the United States, and we are pretending it is not happening.

Sharia — the legal and political framework of Islam — is being woven into developments, institutions, and neighborhoods, including a massive project in Texas. And the consequences will be enormous if we continue to look the other way.

This is the contradiction at the heart of political Islam: It claims universal authority while insisting its harshest rules will never be enforced here. That promise does not stand up to scrutiny. It never has.

Before we can have an honest debate, we’d better understand what Sharia represents. Sharia is not simply a set of religious rules about prayer or diet. It is a comprehensive legal and political structure that governs marriage, finance, criminal penalties, and civic life. It is a parallel system that claims supremacy wherever it takes hold.

This is where the distinction matters. Many Muslims in America want nothing to do with Sharia governance. They came here precisely because they lived under it. But political Islam — the movement that seeks to implement Sharia as law — is not the same as personal religious belief.

It is a political ideology with global ambitions, much like communism. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently warned that Islamist movements do not seek peaceful coexistence with the West. They seek dominance. History backs him up.

How Sharia arrives

Political Islam does not begin with dramatic declarations. It starts quietly, through enclaves that operate by their own rules. That is why the development once called EPIC City — now rebranded as the Meadow — is so concerning. Early plans framed it as a Muslim-only community built around a mega-mosque and governed by Sharia-compliant financing. After state investigations were conducted, the branding changed, but the underlying intent remained the same.

Developers have openly described practices designed to keep non-Muslims out, using fees and ownership structures to create de facto religious exclusivity. This is not assimilation. It is the construction of a parallel society within a constitutional republic.

The warning from those who have lived under it

Years ago, local imams in Texas told me, without hesitation, that certain Sharia punishments “just work.” They spoke about cutting off hands for theft, stoning adulterers, and maintaining separate standards of testimony for men and women. They insisted it was logical and effective while insisting they would never attempt to implement it in Texas.

But when pressed, they could not explain why a system they consider divinely mandated would suddenly stop applying once someone crossed a border.

This is the contradiction at the heart of political Islam: It claims universal authority while insisting its harshest rules will never be enforced here. That promise does not stand up to scrutiny. It never has.

AASHISH KIPHAYET / Contributor | Getty Images

America is vulnerable

Europe is already showing us where this road leads. No-go zones, parallel courts, political intimidation, and clerics preaching supremacy have taken root across major cities.

America’s strength has always come from its melting pot, but assimilation requires boundaries. It requires insisting that the Constitution, not religious law, is the supreme authority on this soil.

Yet we are becoming complacent, even fearful, about saying so. We mistake silence for tolerance. We mistake avoidance for fairness. Meanwhile, political Islam views this hesitation as weakness.

Religious freedom is one of America’s greatest gifts. Muslims may worship freely here, as they should. But political Islam must not be permitted to plant a flag on American soil. The Constitution cannot coexist with a system that denies equal rights, restricts speech, subordinates women, and places clerical authority above civil law.

Wake up before it is too late

Projects like the Meadow are not isolated. They are test runs, footholds, proofs of concept. Political Islam operates with patience. It advances through demographic growth, legal ambiguity, and cultural hesitation — and it counts on Americans being too polite, too distracted, or too afraid to confront it.

We cannot afford that luxury. If we fail to defend the principles that make this country free, we will one day find ourselves asking how a parallel system gained power right in front of us. The answer will be simple: We looked away.

The time to draw boundaries and to speak honestly is now. The time to defend the Constitution as the supreme law of the land is now. Act while there is still time.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.