BLOG

Mark Levin: Society and the Republican Party Have Been Conquered

Author and radio host Mark Levin joined Glenn on radio Tuesday to discuss Rediscovering Americanism: The Tyranny of Progressivism, his latest book which appeals to fellow citizens to reverse course and return to America's most sacred values.

"The Republican Party has been conquered, and much of society has been conquered. There's not a single department, a single agency, a single program, a single entitlement that's --- forget about being eliminated --- that's been curtailed," Levin said.

Levin equates progressivism to tyranny, arguing for the dire need to restore individual freedom and responsibility.

"We have to get back to our own souls and our own hearts and our own belief systems," Levin said. "We don't need to run everything by Mitch McConnell or the public school system or whatever."

Rediscovering Americanism gives the antidote to nearly 100 years of progressive ideology forced upon Americans through political and educational systems.

Enjoy the complimentary clip or read the transcript for details.

GLENN: A top adviser in the Reagan administration, author of multiple best-sellers, chairman of the Landmark Legal Foundation, also the syndicated talk host and host of Levin TV, Mark Levin is with us now. Hi, Mark, how are you?

MARK: Glenn Beck, I'm great. How are you and the family?

GLENN: I'm really good. Really good.

MARK: Good. Good.

GLENN: Mark, I want to jump into --

MARK: Can I just say real fast, I like what you like. I like HGTV. And I love the Gaines. They're terrific.

GLENN: Me too.

MARK: Yeah, I know.

GLENN: They remind me of what America is supposed to be.

MARK: A time gone by, right? Yeah, exactly.

GLENN: And it's good to see that people still believe in that. And, quite honestly, it has replaced the news channels in my home.

MARK: Me too.

GLENN: And with the kids, it's replaced the Disney Channel. I can't trust anything, but I can trust Chip and Joanna with my kids when I walk out of the room.

MARK: All right. You want to hear something funny? When I have to leave my dog for several hours, I keep the TV on HGTV.

GLENN: I got to tell you, I don't know how HGTV is not the number one channel in all of cable.

MARK: Yeah, I don't know. Anyway, sorry about that.

GLENN: All right. I want to jump to the back of the book here, where you talk about the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. And you talk about how this was not set up to give people rights. This was set up to restrain the government from infringing on those rights. And that, you know, you make the point through the book, we really -- we need to stand up for our rights and our natural rights and stop the government from stealing those liberties.

But it seems, Mark, that at every turn, we try, but it just doesn't -- they don't care.

MARK: First of all, people need to know what these rights are so they know what they're defending. And we always discuss them at a surface level. And they need to understand these go back since the beginning of mankind, thousands and thousands of year. This idea of progressivism is old-time tyranny.

And what I try to explain to people is -- you know, we talk about freedom. July 4th is coming up. What does all that mean? And where did the Founders of our country get these ideas from? They didn't invent them. And these philosophers didn't invent them.

You know, we rely on people like, believe it or not, folks, Aristotle and Cicero and Locke and Montesquieu and Burke, and they're not taught.

The other side relies on people like Marx and Hagel and Rousseau, and they are taught. And so you're not going to get -- your children are not going to get what they need to get from our public schools, our colleges, and universities. They're going to get the opposite of it. Because one of the efforts of the progressive movement 100 years ago -- and they've succeeded -- is to take their ideology and make it in the classrooms and teach it in the classrooms. You know, John Dewey talks about this with our -- their positions are not going to be advanced unless they can control what people are thinking.

And so, even look at this Obamacare debate, is there any discussion among the political class whatsoever about individual decision-making, about individual freedom to pick whatever the hell you want to pick and for somebody to sell you whatever the hell they want to sell you.

GLENN: No.

MARK: I mean, when it comes to toasters and refrigerators and cars and so forth, we get to make those decisions. But when it comes to our own well-being and our own lifestyle -- and I try to dig in -- and, Glenn, you're familiar with these things -- I try to dig in and explain to people, cut through all the static, all the chatter that's going on, on TV, and even some radio and so forth and understand more deeply what's going on here, or we're going to get caught in the weeds and we'll never get out of the weeds. So that's the purpose of the book.

GLENN: Yeah. So let's look -- because I was so thrilled that you were really engaging in the fight on progressivism in a -- in a historic sense. And you talk about the early leaders of progressivism and where it came from and how it's working now.

We're seeing this now play out. And we're seeing it play out in -- in this Obamacare discussion. And, you know, they're -- they're lying. They're absolutely lying. And I mean the progressives like Mitch McConnell.

MARK: Exactly.

GLENN: I don't know what game is being played. But this has nothing to do with the parliamentarian. And I don't know if they just are trying to sweep out any constitutionalists and discredit them. I don't know if they really do want a single-payer system. But, I mean, you can't trust the Republicans because the Republicans have -- they were the guys who started the first progressive party.

MARK: Yeah. That's right. Theodore Roosevelt. I mean, let's be honest, the Republican Party is a progressive party. The Democrat Party is a radical progressive party.

GLENN: Yes.

MARK: But there's no Constitutional Party. And I don't want to hear about these little third parties that get about 12,000 votes. I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about the two major parties. And the problem we have here is that we are debating within their environment. It's never about whether the government should be involved in this, it's how much government should be involved in this.

It's never about individual liberty, individual choice, it's always about collectivism. And what the left does -- you hear Bernie Sanders do this now and Nancy Pelosi, thousands of people -- hundreds of thousands of people will die, if we don't have Obamacare. Are you kidding me? I mean, Obamacare, what is it? Eight years old. So now all of a sudden hundreds of thousands of people will die if we don't have Obamacare?

And the problem is, the Republican Party has been conquered. And much of society has been conquered. There's not a single department. A single agency. A single program. A single entitlement that's -- forget about being eliminated, that's been curtailed.

And why is that? It's because we're on this trajectory. So what I'm saying in this book is, okay. Let's step back. Let's understand the genius of our founding. Let's understand what is meant by the Declaration of Independence. We all embrace it. Now, what do they mean by natural law and natural rights? On the other hand, this other side, these two forces that are constantly fighting each other -- although, our force is fighting less these days. What is that all about? That mix of authoritarianism and tyranny and state and all the rest of it, where does that come from?

And, you know, you ignore the academics and you ignore the intellectuals at your own peril. Because in the end, they're the ones that decide our politics. This is a battle over the future of America. It's a battle over humanity. And the centralization of decision-making in the hands of self-claimed masterminds who seek to impose their will and then dress it up as the general good and the general will in the benefit of the people, they are the modern-day tyrants. And they can call themselves progressives all they want. But they are what they are.

GLENN: Is there -- is there a way, Mark, to -- to reach what? 60 percent of the nation. And come together -- and I'm not talking policies -- I'm talking principles of natural law. Do you believe that there are people on both sides that are problems, and both sides that can share the same values, that we can reunite on?

MARK: Here's the problem: I believe there's some people like that. But I don't think there's 60 percent. And I'll tell you why: One of the things the -- the progressive philosophers and then their so-called thinkers, Herbert Croly --

GLENN: Explain -- explain Herbert Croly. People need to know who he is.

MARK: To me, he was the worst of the worst. And he was born in 1868. He lived into the 1830s. He had enormous influence on Theodore Roosevelt, among others. And his parents were, you know, radical leftists. And they -- they intellectualized, in my view, totalitarianism. And he embraces Hagel and Rousseau and Marx in their own way. Mostly Hagel. And so do the others. And it's this: In order to find -- the individual to find their self-realization, that's what they call it -- they have to surrender their personal free will. They have to surrender their individualism if they're to enjoy sort of a paradisiacal existence. So there's a collective. There's a community. And the more perfect this collective and community becomes, the more perfect the individual becomes.

And you're less an individual. You're part of this magnificent society. And you can hear some Marxism in this too. And what this -- this is called, this is the German idealism. It's called historicism. Marx changed it to material historicism. Not for everybody's eyes to glaze over. So Crowley takes this and he, quote, unquote, Americanizes this. And so they have to attack the Declaration of Independence. They have to attack the notion of unalienable, individual rights. They have to attack the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because they have to have conformity. Everybody has to be rowing in the same direction in order to get to this paradise. This paradise, which is nothing more than the personal agenda of these individuals, which they seek to impose on the country.

This massive bureaucracy we have is an outgrowth of the progressive movement. And it exists for the purpose of getting around our constitutional system.

Elections don't matter. They don't go away. It doesn't change the overall direction of the bureaucracy.

They have given themselves tenure, union protection, civil service protection. They're not experts. They're not professionals. They're pushing an ideology. Not all of them. But as a rule.

And so whether we have an election or not, there they are. Redistributing wealth, issuing regulations and fiats, issuing fines and penalties, whether Congress says so or not, the president says so or not, or the American people want it or not, the will of the people here is irrelevant. And yet, Glenn, they always dress it up, when you listen to guys like Bernie Sanders, as populism. They always dress it as popular sovereignty. That people deserve and that people need. And I stand for the people. And yet, it always involves centralized government. It always involves a government-oriented program.

And so the point is that this war on our founding, this war on the Declaration, this war on the Constitution -- separation of powers is the greatest disaster to these people because they need a centralized authority that imposes its will so that we can get to the end of the rainbow. That's why you see the attacks on the Constitution.

But what I put in the book are the exact quotes, these people smearing these principles, attacking the Declaration, attacking the Constitution. They call -- the individualism that you and I and our listeners believe in, they call "old individualism." There's a new individualism, where you surrender to the state.

You and I talk about liberty. For liberty to you and me, that means the circle of liberty around us that Aristotle talked about and that de Tocqueville talked about and that Locke talked about, this circle of liberty that the government may not penetrate. And the extent to which the government is involved in our liberty needs to intervene. It must not seek to do so to dominate us.

And that's not what Obamacare is. That's not what all these things that they've created, on the left. It is intended to change us, to remake us. And the reason you get increased centralization and increased police state policies and tactics, is because it goes against man's nature. It goes against history.

All right. Rambling.

GLENN: No, no. How long do I have you?

MARK: Let's see here. 10:30, maybe.

GLENN: Think about it in the break. I'm going to come back.

All right. Hang on for just a second. Let me take a quick break with Mark Levin. Because I want to pick it up where he just left -- I have a couple of questions on how we can come together because he's right. That is the problem.

Now, how can we change that? Back in a second with Mark Levin.

[break]

GLENN: We have Mark Levin on. He is the author of rediscovering Americanism. It's his new book. Friend of the program. One of the more brilliant people.

MARK: And friend of Glenn Beck.

GLENN: Thank you very much, Mark.

We have become good friends over the last year or so. And, you know, we don't always agree on everything. But who does?

MARK: Right.

GLENN: And we agree on for more than we disagree.

MARK: That's right.

GLENN: Mark, you said on your radio show about the Senate health care bill, that the two parties have abandoned capitalism. It goes really to the point of your book. If we don't -- if we abandon our principles, we never get the country back that we remember as a kid, all the good parts without all the bad parts.

We are -- I mean, the -- the Republicans are abandoning all of that. So let's use your book. And how do we get people to understand that this is a really bad deal that Mitch McConnell has just given us and we got to stand up for our own individual right?

MARK: I think, first of all, we have to stop defining ourselves through the Republican Party or Washington or whatever.

GLENN: Right.

MARK: It's a cesspool.

GLENN: Yes.

MARK: We have to get back to our own souls and our own hearts and our own belief systems. And it's going to take the citizenry to do that. And, you know, I include a letter in this book from Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, which he looks back at Rome and he basically says Cicero, Rufus, Cato, none of them could save Rome because the people lost their virtue. No system could be put in place to save them.

What I'm saying is we, the people, with our families, with our friends at the grassroots, we don't need to run everything by Mitch McConnell or the public school system or whatever. We can read. We can talk. We can have the discussions like the colonists did and so forth and so on at the dinner table, at our restaurants, and our churches and synagogues and so forth. But we can't have those discussions if we don't really know the nub of the matter. And that's what I'm trying to get at.

I don't know if this will have any influence or not. If it affects 1,000 people, that's a good thing. I don't expect it to change history, Glenn. It's taken us over 100 years to get here. It's probably going to take us, if we can, over 100 years to get out of this. But I don't know.

GLENN: Boy, I couldn't agree with you more. And it's the reason why I've kind of let my shoulders kind of go down a bit of taking on such a big fight. The fight has to be fought by the individual, and we all have to choose to be in the fight or not.

Mark Levin, the name of the book is Rediscovering Americanism and the Tyranny of Progressivism. Mark, always good to have you. Please say hi to Julie for me. And good luck on everything you're working on.

MARK: And your beautiful wife too. God bless.

GLENN: God bless. Rediscovering Americanism. Mark Levin. Back in a second.

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.