Alex Jones Watch: Children Are Being Kidnapped and Sent to a Secret Colony On Mars

July 05, 2017

WRITER

A story that very well could be the biggest story in human history broke last week and was reported on by Alex Jones on his show. Wednesday on radio, Glenn and the guys put on their tinfoil hats as they followed Jones down the rabbit hole and broke down the shocking claims.

Jones' guest had this to say:

This may strike your listeners as way out, but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride. So that once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

Alex Jones is no stranger to controversy, but this claim seemed to force even him to recognize the absurdity. He did, however, provide some cover for his guest and add a little spin:

Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. You know, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on. But I know this, we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars. And people say, oh, look, it looks like, you know, mechanics. They go, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening. Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

This one might be kind of hard to prove, but the story did answer some questions for Glenn on another Alex Jones conspiracy.

"That's why they didn't find any children in the pizza place," Glenn said. "They've just been shipped to Mars."

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

PAT: Speaking of aliens, you want to hear about a real frightening alien story that I notice you're avoiding all day. All day he's avoiding the biggest alien story of the day, of the week. Perhaps one of the bigger stories in human history.

JEFFY: Hasn't even mentioned it.

STU: Perhaps!

GLENN: All right. Just give it --

PAT: That was a silly statement.

STU: It was.

PAT: Quite obviously the biggest story in human history.

JEFFY: It's embarrassing you wouldn't even mention it.

GLENN: Just give it to me. Just give it to me.

PAT: This broke the other day. I can't take credit for this. We did not break this. This was broken by Alex Jones on his show, I believe, last week.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out, but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride.

GLENN: Okay.

VOICE: So that once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

GLENN: Wow.

PAT: Wow.

ALEX: Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. You know, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on.

But I know this, we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars. And people say, oh, look, it looks like, you know, mechanics. They go, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening. Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

PAT: The child sex slave industry in Mars.

STU: What the hell was that clip --

PAT: I mean, why are we not talking about this? Why is something not being done? These children -- well, they're not children by the time they get there, granted. Okay.

GLENN: It's like a six months' trip to Mars.

PAT: I know. Why is it 20 years? Are they traveling --

GLENN: They may be using an old VanoLiner.

STU: Oh, okay. Yeah.

PAT: On the Chevy Astro van.

GLENN: The Chevy Astro van.

PAT: Top speed, about 40 miles an hour.

GLENN: Yeah. Scooby-Doo. They were using the -- it was twenty years. They got the --

PAT: Twenty-year trip.

GLENN: What was it? The Mystery Machine. Yeah, but what kind of van was it? Not the new one. Not the new one --

JEFFY: No, those were those Handi-Vans.

GLENN: Yes.

JEFFY: Those little Chevy Handi-Vans with the wheel up front.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Yeah, I see you driving a white one around some neighborhoods sometimes.

JEFFY: Sell ice cream. Got to make some extra money somewhere. What are you talking about?

PAT: Just a little ice cream. Nothing wrong with that.

(laughter)

STU: That is a --

GLENN: Don't come around my house. I'll buy you out of ice cream every time you're in my neighborhood, brother.

STU: Wait. Can we discuss his actual point there? Because, first of all, you can see Alex Jones actually senses the media is going to make fun of him on this one.

PAT: Well, yeah.

STU: He's like, well, the media is going to jump all over this one. But his instinct is to still defend the guy.

PAT: Let me tell you something, NASA, about 90 percent of their missions are secret. Really?

JEFFY: I've been told by high-level NASA engineers, there's a lot going on.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Hang on just a second. You don't even need to get to Alex Jones. You really don't. Just play it again. I'll tell you where to stop.

STU: Really?

PAT: All right.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out.

PAT: No.

VOICE: But we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars --

PAT: Colony on Mars.

VOICE: -- that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: Why even go to Alex Jones?

PAT: I know.

GLENN: I mean, this is enough to feast on for a week.

STU: Well -- it is.

PAT: It is.

STU: Because, you're right. First of all, they were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year journey. First of all, they don't seem to actually be there yet.

GLENN: Who kidnapped?

PAT: Yeah. Who kidnapped them? I guess NASA.

STU: I guess NASA.

So they were kidnapped, they were sent into space on a 20-year mission. Although, he said there is a colony on Mars already. So -- but they don't seem to be there. He doesn't seem to have that down.

GLENN: Well, no. They are there. Because they're forced -- there's no way back. So they're forced to be slaves.

JEFFY: A twenty-year journey.

GLENN: But what are they doing -- what are they building on Mars?

STU: But listen to his wording, he's saying there is a colony on Mars.

PAT: Yes. But it's the colony of child sex slaves. Is it not?

STU: First of all, if they're there by themselves, who is enslaving them. Right? You would need someone to enslave them. And if they're 20-year-olds --

GLENN: Right. And why would they be sex slaves? Why do you just assume this is a sex planet?

PAT: They have no other choice, but --

STU: You somehow turned this story weird. How did you do that?

GLENN: Why does he always go to the darkest places?

STU: But listen to this.

PAT: Listen to this.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out.

PAT: No. Come on now.

VOICE: But we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars.

STU: Colony on Mars.

PAT: Okay. There is a colony on Mars.

STU: Okay. So it's there, right?

VOICE: It is populated by children who were kidnapped.

PAT: Populated by children who were kidnapped.

STU: Who were kidnapped.

VOICE: And sent to space on a 20-year ride.

STU: Okay. Twenty-year ride.

VOICE: So once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

PAT: No alternative. Okay. They have no alternatives but to be slaves.

JEFFY: I mean, no matter what planet they land on, they have no alternative.

GLENN: Yeah, look. Hang on just a second, you land on a planet, there's no food, there's no water, there's nothing. And they're like, use those shovels and make a big house for me because I'm coming at some point. You might kill the guy with a shovel, but as long as he's sending you food and water, yes, you're going to build him whatever he tells you to build.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: Because there's no --

PAT: That's probably true. Unless you have the smarts of, say, Matt Damon and you know how to make potatoes out of your own poop.

JEFFY: Bingo, my friend.

PAT: Why then, maybe you take a chance.

GLENN: And here's the problem. Here's the problem: They went up 17 years before that movie was made. They don't have any idea.

PAT: Yeah, right.

STU: That's true. Now, wait. You're exonerating Alex Jones' point here.

JEFFY: I know.

STU: Because he says -- okay. I know. First of all, he says, I know the media is going to mock this. But then he defends it anyway and tries to figure out a way that it could theoretically be true. Then he makes one of the most amazing odd guttural noises I've ever heard in my life. (sound effect).

(laughter)

But then he says, A, there's lots of wreckage on Mars. It looks like there's mechanics there.

GLENN: Mechanics. Fixing the Astro van! Fixing the Astro van.

JEFFY: Right.

PAT: Yep.

STU: Listen to this one more time. We have to listen to this one more time.

PAT: Do you want to start with Alex?

STU: I think from here is fine. Yeah.

PAT: All right.

VOICE: Now, there's all kind of --

ALEX: Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea. There's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. I mean, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on.

But I know this, we see a bunch of (sound effect), mechanical wreckage --

PAT: We see a bunch of (sound effect).

STU: We got to isolate that.

PAT: We see a lot of that. A lot of (sound effect). You know, I see a lot of (sound effect).

GLENN: What is it about Alex Jones that entertains you two for hours? You guys could listen to him for hours.

JEFFY: Oh.

PAT: I could. I could. We could do just a whole show just on his segments. For sure.

STU: We didn't even get to the mechanic part yet.

PAT: Right. Here's (sound effect).

ALEX: And people say, oh, look, it looks like mechanics. They go, oh, your a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening.

Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

JEFFY: Clearly.

STU: What?

PAT: What?

GLENN: Guys, where do you think -- where do you think all those Chevy Volts went? The government --

PAT: On a slow flight to Mars.

GLENN: Yes. There's no oxygen there. Fire -- what happens to fire with no oxygen? It can't burn. It's the only place the Chevy Volt is safe.

JEFFY: And I will say, as -- as you would expect, NASA has denied that it's running a child slave colony on --

PAT: Those bastards.

STU: Well, of course they're going to say that.

PAT: What are they going to say?

GLENN: That's why they didn't find any children in the pizza place.

PAT: They're all on Mars.

GLENN: They've just been shipped to Mars.

STU: The tunnels go to Mars.

Could China OWN our National Parks?

Jonathan Newton / Contributor | Getty Images

The left’s idea of stewardship involves bulldozing bison and barring access. Lee’s vision puts conservation back in the hands of the people.

The media wants you to believe that Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is trying to bulldoze Yellowstone and turn national parks into strip malls — that he’s calling for a reckless fire sale of America’s natural beauty to line developers’ pockets. That narrative is dishonest. It’s fearmongering, and, by the way, it’s wrong.

Here’s what’s really happening.

Private stewardship works. It’s local. It’s accountable. It’s incentivized.

The federal government currently owns 640 million acres of land — nearly 28% of all land in the United States. To put that into perspective, that’s more territory than France, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom combined.

Most of this land is west of the Mississippi River. That’s not a coincidence. In the American West, federal ownership isn’t just a bureaucratic technicality — it’s a stranglehold. States are suffocated. Locals are treated as tenants. Opportunities are choked off.

Meanwhile, people living east of the Mississippi — in places like Kentucky, Georgia, or Pennsylvania — might not even realize how little land their own states truly control. But the same policies that are plaguing the West could come for them next.

Lee isn’t proposing to auction off Yellowstone or pave over Yosemite. He’s talking about 3 million acres — that’s less than half of 1% of the federal estate. And this land isn’t your family’s favorite hiking trail. It’s remote, hard to access, and often mismanaged.

Failed management

Why was it mismanaged in the first place? Because the federal government is a terrible landlord.

Consider Yellowstone again. It’s home to the last remaining herd of genetically pure American bison — animals that haven’t been crossbred with cattle. Ranchers, myself included, would love the chance to help restore these majestic creatures on private land. But the federal government won’t allow it.

So what do they do when the herd gets too big?

They kill them. Bulldoze them into mass graves. That’s not conservation. That’s bureaucratic malpractice.

And don’t even get me started on bald eagles — majestic symbols of American freedom and a federally protected endangered species, now regularly slaughtered by wind turbines. I have pictures of piles of dead bald eagles. Where’s the outrage?

Biden’s federal land-grab

Some argue that states can’t afford to manage this land themselves. But if the states can’t afford it, how can Washington? We’re $35 trillion in debt. Entitlements are strained, infrastructure is crumbling, and the Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, and National Park Service are billions of dollars behind in basic maintenance. Roads, firebreaks, and trails are falling apart.

The Biden administration quietly embraced something called the “30 by 30” initiative, a plan to lock up 30% of all U.S. land and water under federal “conservation” by 2030. The real goal is 50% by 2050.

That entails half of the country being taken away from you, controlled not by the people who live there but by technocrats in D.C.

You think that won’t affect your ability to hunt, fish, graze cattle, or cut timber? Think again. It won’t be conservatives who stop you from building a cabin, raising cattle, or teaching your grandkids how to shoot a rifle. It’ll be the same radical environmentalists who treat land as sacred — unless it’s your truck, your deer stand, or your back yard.

Land as collateral

Moreover, the U.S. Treasury is considering putting federally owned land on the national balance sheet, listing your parks, forests, and hunting grounds as collateral.

What happens if America defaults on its debt?

David McNew / Stringer | Getty Images

Do you think our creditors won’t come calling? Imagine explaining to your kids that the lake you used to fish in is now under foreign ownership, that the forest you hunted in belongs to China.

This is not hypothetical. This is the logical conclusion of treating land like a piggy bank.

The American way

There’s a better way — and it’s the American way.

Let the people who live near the land steward it. Let ranchers, farmers, sportsmen, and local conservationists do what they’ve done for generations.

Did you know that 75% of America’s wetlands are on private land? Or that the most successful wildlife recoveries — whitetail deer, ducks, wild turkeys — didn’t come from Washington but from partnerships between private landowners and groups like Ducks Unlimited?

Private stewardship works. It’s local. It’s accountable. It’s incentivized. When you break it, you fix it. When you profit from the land, you protect it.

This is not about selling out. It’s about buying in — to freedom, to responsibility, to the principle of constitutional self-governance.

So when you hear the pundits cry foul over 3 million acres of federal land, remember: We don’t need Washington to protect our land. We need Washington to get out of the way.

Because this isn’t just about land. It’s about liberty. And once liberty is lost, it doesn’t come back easily.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

EXPOSED: Why the left’s trans agenda just CRASHED at SCOTUS

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

You never know what you’re going to get with the U.S. Supreme Court these days.

For all of the Left’s insane panic over having six supposedly conservative justices on the court, the decisions have been much more of a mixed bag. But thank God – sincerely – there was a seismic win for common sense at the Supreme Court on Wednesday. It’s a win for American children, parents, and for truth itself.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s state ban on irreversible transgender procedures for minors.

The mostly conservative justices stood tall in this case, while Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson predictably dissented. This isn’t just Tennessee’s victory – 20 other red states that have similar bans can now breathe easier, knowing they can protect vulnerable children from these sick, experimental, life-altering procedures.

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, saying Tennessee’s law does not violate the Equal Protection Clause. It’s rooted in a very simple truth that common sense Americans get: kids cannot consent to permanent damage. The science backs this up – Norway, Finland, and the UK have all sounded alarms about the lack of evidence for so-called “gender-affirming care.” The Trump administration’s recent HHS report shredded the activist claims that these treatments help kids’ mental health. Nothing about this is “healthcare.” It is absolute harm.

The Left, the ACLU, and the Biden DOJ screamed “discrimination” and tried to twist the Constitution to force this radical ideology on our kids.

Fortunately, the Supreme Court saw through it this time. In her concurring opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett nailed it: gender identity is not some fixed, immutable trait like race or sex. Detransitioners are speaking out, regretting the surgeries and hormones they were rushed into as teens. WPATH – the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, the supposed experts on this, knew that kids cannot fully grasp this decision, and their own leaked documents prove that they knew it. But they pushed operations and treatments on kids anyway.

This decision is about protecting the innocent from a dangerous ideology that denies biology and reality. Tennessee’s Attorney General calls this a “landmark victory in defense of America’s children.” He’s right. This time at least, the Supreme Court refused to let judicial activism steal our kids’ futures. Now every state needs to follow Tennessee’s lead on this, and maybe the tide will continue to turn.

Insider alert: Glenn’s audience EXPOSES the riots’ dark truth

Barbara Davidson / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn asked for YOUR take on the Los Angeles anti-ICE riots, and YOU responded with a thunderous verdict. Your answers to our recent Glennbeck.com poll cut through the establishment’s haze, revealing a profound skepticism of their narrative.

The results are undeniable: 98% of you believe taxpayer-funded NGOs are bankrolling these riots, a bold rejection of the claim that these are grassroots protests. Meanwhile, 99% dismiss the mainstream media’s coverage as woefully inadequate—can the official story survive such resounding doubt? And 99% of you view the involvement of socialist and Islamist groups as a growing threat to national security, signaling alarm at what Glenn calls a coordinated “Color Revolution” lurking beneath the surface.

You also stand firmly with decisive action: 99% support President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to quell the chaos. These numbers defy the elite’s tired excuses and reflect a demand for truth and accountability. Are your tax dollars being weaponized to destabilize America? You’ve answered with conviction.

Your voice sends a powerful message to those who dismiss the unrest as mere “protests.” You spoke, and Glenn listened. Keep shaping the conversation at Glennbeck.com.

Want to make your voice heard? Check out more polls HERE.

EXPOSED: Your tax dollars FUND Marxist riots in LA

Anadolu / Contributor | Getty Images

Protesters wore Che shirts, waved foreign flags, and chanted Marxist slogans — but corporate media still peddles the ‘spontaneous outrage’ narrative.

I sat in front of the television this weekend, watching the glittering spectacle of corporate media do what it does best: tell me not to believe my lying eyes.

According to the polished news anchors, what I was witnessing in Los Angeles was “mostly peaceful protests.” They said it with all the earnest gravitas of someone reading a bedtime story, while behind them the streets looked like a deleted scene from “Mad Max.” Federal agents dodged concrete slabs as if it were an Olympic sport. A man in a Che Guevara crop top tried to set a police car on fire. Dumpster fires lit the night sky like some sort of postapocalyptic luau.

If you suggest that violent criminals should be deported or imprisoned, you’re painted as the extremist.

But sure, it was peaceful. Tear gas clouds and Molotov cocktails are apparently the incense and candles of this new civic religion.

The media expects us to play along — to nod solemnly while cities burn and to call it “activism.”

Let’s call this what it is: delusion.

Another ‘peaceful’ riot

If the Titanic “mostly floated” and the Hindenburg “mostly flew,” then yes, the latest L.A. riots are “mostly peaceful.” But history tends to care about those tiny details at the end — like icebergs and explosions.

The coverage was full of phrases like “spontaneous,” “grassroots,” and “organic,” as if these protests materialized from thin air. But many of the signs and banners looked like they’d been run off at ComradesKinkos.com — crisp print jobs with slogans promoting socialism, communism, and various anti-American regimes. Palestinian flags waved beside banners from Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba, and El Salvador. It was like someone looted a United Nations souvenir shop and turned it into a revolution starter pack.

And guess who funded it? You did.

According to at least one report, much of this so-called spontaneous rage fest was paid for with your tax dollars. Tens of millions of dollars from the Biden administration ensured your paycheck funded Trotsky cosplayers chucking firebombs at local coffee shops.

The same aging radicals from the 1970s — now armed with tenure, pensions, and book deals — are cheering from the sidelines, waxing poetic about how burning a squad car is “liberation.” These are the same folks who once wore tie-dye and flew to help guerrilla fighters and now applaud chaos under the banner of “progress.”

This is not progress. It is not protest. It’s certainly not justice or peace.

It’s an attempt to dismantle the American system — and if you dare say that out loud, you’re labeled a bigot, a fascist, or, worst of all, someone who notices reality.

And what sparked this taxpayer-funded riot? Enforcement against illegal immigrants — many of whom, according to official arrest records, are repeat violent offenders. These are not the “dreamers” or the huddled masses yearning to breathe free. These are criminals with long, violent rap sheets — allowed to remain free by a broken system that prioritizes ideology over public safety.

Photo by Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg | Getty Images

This is what people are rioting over — not the mistreatment of the innocent, but the arrest of the guilty. And in California, that’s apparently a cause for outrage.

The average American, according to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, is supposed to worry they’ll be next. But unless you’re in the habit of assaulting people, smuggling, or firing guns into people’s homes, you probably don’t have much to fear.

Still, if you suggest that violent criminals should be deported or imprisoned, you’re painted as the extremist.

The left has lost it

This is what happens when a culture loses its grip on reality. We begin to call arson “art,” lawlessness “liberation,” and criminals “community members.” We burn the good and excuse the evil — all while the media insists it’s just “vibes.”

But it’s not just vibes. It’s violence, paid for by you, endorsed by your elected officials, and whitewashed by newsrooms with more concern for hair and lighting than for truth.

This isn’t activism. This is anarchism. And Democratic politicians are fueling the flame.