Obama Math: Spend $3,000, Save $8,000

Senator Mike Lee recently confronted President Obama's Secretary of Energy Steven Chu about his former statements on his belief that America's gas prices need to be closer to prices in Europe. He made this statement back when gas prices in Europe were around $8 per gallon--ours currently appear to be moving towards $6 per gallon in some parts of the country.

After hearing the audio of Senator Lee's epic confrontation with Steven Chu, Glenn made the point that Senator Mike Lee was able to expose Steven Chu with the truth, "but no one will confront President Obama with the truth."

This morning on radio Glenn played audio of part of a speech President Obama gave on his energy policy, gas prices, and fuel efficiency standards on automotive manufacturers.

Here is what the President had to say:

“Because of these new standards for cars, and trucks they're going to go further and use less fuel every year, and that means pretty soon you'll be able to fill up your car every two weeks instead of every week, and over time that saves you or a typical family, about $8,000 a year.”

Really Mr. President? If the average family fills their car up every two weeks, instead of every week, they'll save $8,000 a year? Not so much--as Glenn pointed out, the average family doesn’t spend $16,000 a year on gasoline, which is how much they would have to spend for President Obama's claim to be anywhere close to accurate.

Stu points out that the average family spends around $3,000 a year,“so if their average spending $3,000 I'm not sure how they would save $8,000. Pay us $5,000 to fill our tanks?"

“But no one will question this President,” Glenn said, “No one will run with that story.”

Glenn went on to describe that no one will call the President out on the statements he makes when he is on the campaign trail, or even question how an average family could possibly be saving $8,000 a year on gasoline.

Stu also described how enthusiastically the crowd was reacting to these statements by the President. The crowd was cheering on the fact that they will be saving $8,000 a year on gas, when that’s most likely not anywhere close to what they’re spending, if they fall into the category of “an average family.”

“The crowd is not being critical at all,” Stu said. “Think about what their saying. $8,000 would be $700 a month on gas.  It’s so ridiculous.  What are they saying? They’re filling their tank up twenty times a month?”

Glenn, Pat and Stu all commented on how unbelievably silent the press has been on these comments.

“If this was Romney or Santorum on the campaign trail saying that, they would be obliterated by the press,” Pat said.

Glenn added on to that point, describing how they would mock any GOP candidate or elected leader who said something like that, and how it would be a top story throughout the mainstream media.

COVID is back! Or that is what we’re being told anyway...

A recent spike in COVID cases has triggered the left's alarm bells, and the following institutions have begun to reinstate COVID-era mandates. You might want to avoid them if you enjoy breathing freely...

Do YOU think institutions should bring back COVID-era mandates if cases increase? Let us know your thoughts HERE.

Morris Brown College

Both of Upstate Medical's hospitals in Syracuse, New York

Corey Henry / Senior Staff Photographer | The Daily Orange

Auburn Community Hospital, New York

Kevin Rivoli / The Citizen | Auburn Pub

Lionsgate Studio

AaronP/Bauer-Griffin / Contributor | GETTY IMAGES

United Health Services in New York

Kaiser Permanente in California

Justin Sullivan / Staff | GETTY IMAGES

There was a time when both the Left and the Right agreed that parents have the final say in raising their children... Not anymore.

In the People's Republic of California, the STATE, not parents, will determine whether children should undergo transgender treatments. The California state legislature just passed a law that will require judges in child custody cases to consider whether parents support a child’s gender transition. According to the law, the state now thinks total affirmation is an integral part of a child’s “health, safety, and welfare.”

We are inching closer to a dystopia where the state, not the parents, have ultimate rights over their children, a history that people from former Soviet nations would feign repeating.

Glenn dove into the law AND MORE in this episode titled, "Parental Advisory: The EXPLICIT plot to control YOUR kids." To get all the research that went into this episode AND information on how YOU can fight back, enter your email address below:

If you didn't catch Wednesday night's Glenn TV special, be sure to check it out HERE!

The Biden admin has let in MORE illegal aliens than the populations of THESE 15 states

GUILLERMO ARIAS / Contributor | Getty Images

There are currently an estimated 16.8 MILLION illegal aliens residing in the United States as of June 2023, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). This number is already 1.3 million higher than FAIR's January 2022 estimate of 15.5 million and a 2.3 million increase from its end-of-2020 estimate. Even Democrats like New York City's Mayor Adams Mayor Adams are waking up to what Conservatives have been warning for years: we are in a border CRISIS.

However, this isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010. In the first two years of the Biden administration alone, the illegal alien population increased by 16 PERCENT nationwide, imposing a whopping net cost of $150.6 BILLION PER YEAR on American taxpayers. That is nearly DOUBLE the total amount that the Biden administration has sent to Ukraine.

This isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010.

These large numbers often make it difficult to conceptualize the sheer impact of illegal immigration on the United States. To put it in perspective, we have listed ALL 15 states and the District of Colombia that have smaller populations than the 2.3 MILLION illegal immigrants, who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration. That is more than the entire populations of Wyoming, Vermont, and South Dakota COMBINED—and the American taxpayers have to pay the price.

Here are all 16 states/districts that have FEWER people than the illegal immigrants who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration.

1. New Mexico

Population: 2,110,011

2. Idaho

Population: 1,973,752

3. Nebraska

Population: 1,972,292

4. West Virginia

Population: 1,764,786

5. Hawaii

Population: 1,433,238

6. New Hampshire

Population: 1,402,957

7. Maine

Population: 1,393,442

8. Montana

Population: 1,139,507

9. Rhode Island

Population: 1,090,483

10. Delaware

Population: 1,031,985

11. South Dakota

Population: 923,484

12. North Dakota

Population: 780,588

13. Alaska

Population: 732,984

14. Washington DC

Population: 674,815

15. Vermont

Population: 647,156

16. Wyoming

Population: 583,279

POLL: Should the Government control the future of AI?

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

Earlier this week, tech titans, lawmakers, and union leaders met on Capitol Hill to discuss the future of AI regulation. The three-hour meeting boasted an impressive roster of tech leaders including, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and others, along with more than 60 US Senators.

Tech Titans and Senators gathered in the Kennedy Caucus Room.The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

The meeting was closed to the public, so what was exactly discussed is unknown. However, what we do know is that a majority of the CEOs support AI regulation, the most vocal of which is Elon Musk. During the meeting, Musk called AI "a double-edged sword" and strongly pushed for regulation in the interest of public safety.

A majority of the CEOs support AI regulation.

Many other related issues were discussed, including the disruption AI has caused to the job market. As Glenn has discussed on his program, the potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real, and many have already felt the effects. From taxi drivers to Hollywood actors and writers, AI's presence can be felt everywhere and lawmakers are unsure how to respond.

The potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real.

Ultimately, the meeting's conclusion was less than decisive, with several Senators making comments to the tune of "we need more time before we act." The White House is expected to release an executive order regarding AI regulation by the end of the year. But now it's YOUR turn to tell us what YOU think needs to be done!

Should A.I. be regulated?

Can the government be trusted with the power to regulate A.I.? 

Can Silicon Valley be trusted to regulate AI? 

Should AI development be slowed for safety, despite its potential advantages?

If a job can be done cheaper and better by AI, should it be taken away from a human?

Do you feel that your job is threatened by AI?