"Republican" women for Obama...

WARNING: If you’re a conservative women, this may make you sick.

Obama’s campaign team has produced a campaign commercial starring alleged “Republican” women who claim they are now for Obama. As you’ve probably predicted, most attribute their sudden switch to the so-called “war on women”. One woman went as far to basically say, ‘if you are for a small government, then you have to be for Obama because he’s pro-choice’.

Here is the ad:

This morning on radio, Stu and Pat had a few things to say about the insulting ad.

Stu took note that the ad doesn’t exactly portray women as extremely intelligent in general. Among a handful of comments throughout the video that left Stu and Pat bewildered, was one woman's claim that she’s “voted probably as many times as Republicans got elected.”

“Does that mean when they didn’t get elected, she voted Democrat?” Pat joked.

It's hard to know what the woman or the Obama campaign meant with her comment, leading Stu to ask if the Obama’s re-election campaign even knew that they can edit video.

But that was just the tip of the iceberg with the ad that claims the Republican Party has gone “too far right” for conservative women.

“Something’s happened in the last couple of years that has completely turned everything upside down. The Republican Party has gone too far to the right – I feel like I’m more of a moderate.”

So, Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee and former Massachusetts governor who has practically been running for president since 2008, has swung too far to the right in the last couple of years? The same guy that grass roots conservative find to be too moderate?

“It’s not like Mitt is new to the parade in 2012,” Stu said.

The ad goes on to claim that there don’t seem to be any “moderate Republicans” anymore.

That makes sense, if you forget about all of the progressive policies that Stu and Pat point out the "too conservative" GOP has implemented in the last five years - things like Medicare Part D, the GM Bailout, Tarp - all policies implemented or voted for by the Republicans at the top of the party.

Pat also couldn’t help but point out that the moderate Democrats, however, are becoming more and more impossible to find, and noted how their platform has concerning similarities to the platforms of extreme leftist organizations like the Communist Party USA.

“The Democrat Party is so extreme left that this is laughable,” he said.

Being an Obama campaign video, the ad couldn’t end without first making the women appear victimized first.

“I think I just became more aware of the things that they were saying, what that meant, and how it affected me and my life. It’s just hard to understand. It’s hard to talk to people about it. It’s divided our nation, these new attitudes.”

And of course, we can’t forget the war on “women’s health” these “extremist Republicans" are allegedly waging.

“One of the things that make me really upset about it is the attitude towards birth control, contraceptives and abortion. If you truly believe in small government, that government shouldn’t be decideing what I can and cannot do with my own body.”

Good thing she’s in favor of the man Obamacare was named after, a policy that took the keys away from your doctor and handed them over to "the man."

“I’m very concerned about Mitt Romney’s policies concerning women’s rights. He wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. Mitt Romney has endorsed governors that overturned equal pay for women.”

Apparently the Obama campaign thinks it’s shocking to conservative women than a Republican would want to overturn Roe v. Wade – something they’ve opposed since, like, 1980.

Later in the show, Stu adds to his point about how ridiculous the claim is that the Democrat Party is the one that will keep the decisions about your health and your body out of the hands of the government. Not only did the Democrats vote heavily in favor of and pass Obamacare, in cities across the country they're trying to micromanage everything you eat. TheBlaze Blog has more facts that refute the claims made in the video HERE.

It was also revealed later in the radio show that at least a couple of the women in the video were registered Democrats and have been for quite some time. And according to one of their Facebook pages, is a fan of moveon.org and other hardcore leftist organizations.

So, the latest failure of the Barack Obama presidency is the ability to find at least a handful of women who legitimately decided to leave the Republican party to support his re-election campaign.

Watch the full radio show on demand on TheBlaze TV. Sign up for a 14 day FREE trial today!

On the radio program Thursday, Glenn Beck sat down with chief researcher Jason Buttrill to go over two bombshell developments that have recently come to light regarding former Vice President Joe Biden's role in the 2016 dismissal of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

"Wow! Two huge stories dropped within about 24 hours of each other," Jason began. He went on to explain that a court ruling in Ukraine has just prompted an "actual criminal investigation against Joe Biden in Ukraine."

This stunning development coincided with the release of leaked phone conversations, which took place in late 2015 and early 2016, allegedly among then-Vice President Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry, and Ukraine's former President Petro Poroshenko.

One of the audiotapes seems to confirm allegations of a quid pro quo between Biden and Poroshenko, with the later admitting that he asked Shokin to resign despite having no evidence of him "doing anything wrong" in exchange for a $1 billion loan guarantee.

"Poroshenko said, 'despite the fact that we didn't have any corruption charges on [Shokin], and we don't have any information about him doing something wrong, I asked him to resign,'" Jason explained. "But none of the Western media is pointing this out."

Watch the video below for more details:


Listen to the released audiotapes in full here.

Use code GLENN to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

A recently declassified email, written by former National Security Adviser Susan Rice and sent herself on the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, reveals the players involved in the origins of the Trump-Russia probe and "unmasking" of then-incoming National Security Adviser, Gen. Michael Flynn.

Rice's email details a meeting in the Oval Office on Jan 5, 2017, which included herself, former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former Vice President Joe Biden, and former President Barack Obama. Acting Director of National Intelligence, Richard Grenell, fully declassified the email recently amid President Trump's repeated references to "Obamagate" and claims that Obama "used his last weeks in office to target incoming officials and sabotage the new administration."

On Glenn Beck's Wednesday night special, Glenn broke down the details of Rice's email and discussed what they reveal about the Obama administration officials involved in the Russia investigation's origins.

Watch the video clip below:

Fellow BlazeTV host, Mark Levin, joined Glenn Beck on his exclusive Friday episode of "GlennTV" to discuss why the declassified list of Obama administration officials who were aware of the details of Gen. Michael Flynn's wiretapped phone calls are so significant.

Glenn argued that Obama built a covert bureaucracy to "transform America" for a long time to come, and Gen. Flynn was targeted because he happened to know "where the bodies were buried", making him a threat to Obama's "secret legacy."

Levin agreed, noting the "shocking extent of the police state tactics" by the Obama administration. He recalled several scandalous happenings during Obama's "scandal free presidency," which nobody seems to remember.

Watch the video below for more:


Use code GLENN to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Colleges and universities should be home to a lively and open debate about questions both current and timeless, independent from a political bias or rules that stifle speech. Unfortunately for students, speaking out about personal beliefs or challenging political dogma can be a dangerous undertaking. I experienced this firsthand as an undergraduate, and I'm fighting that trend now as an adjunct professor.

In 2013, Glenn Beck was one of the most listened to radio personalities in the world. For a college senior with hopes of working on policy and media, a job working for Glenn was a ticket to big things. I needed a foot in the door and hoped to tap into the alumni network at the small liberal arts school where I was an undergrad. When I met with a career services specialist in early March 2013 about possible alumni connections to Glenn Beck, she disdainfully told me: "Why would you want to work for someone like him?" That was the beginning and end of our conversation.

I was floored by her response, and sent an email to the school complaining that her behavior was inappropriate. Her personal opinions, political or otherwise, I argued, shouldn't play a role in the decision to help students.

That isn't the kind of response a student should hear when seeking guidance and help in kick starting their career. Regardless of the position, a career specialist or professors' opinion or belief shouldn't be a factor in whether the student deserves access to the alumni network and schools' resources.

Now, seven years later, I work full time for a law firm and part time as an adjunct teaching business to undergraduate students. The culture at colleges and universities seems to have gotten even worse, unfortunately, since I was an undergrad.

College is a time to explore, dream big and challenge assumptions.

I never want to see a student told they shouldn't pursue their goals, regardless of their personal or political beliefs. College is a time to explore, dream big and challenge assumptions. I never got access to the alumni network or schools' resources from the career services office.

Lucky for students in 2020, there are several legal organizations that help students protect their rights when an issue goes beyond what can be handled by an undergraduate facing tremendous pressure from a powerful academic institution. Organizations like Speech First and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), for instance, are resources I wish I knew about at the time.

When I experienced mistreatment from my college, I spoke up and challenged the behavior by emailing the administration and explaining what happened. I received a letter from the career services specialist apologizing for the "unprofessional comment."

What she described in that apology as a "momentary lapse of good judgement" was anything but momentary. It was indicative of the larger battle for ideas that has been happening on college campuses across the country. In the past seven years, the pressure, mistreatment and oppression of free expression have only increased. Even right now, some are raising concerns that campus administrations are using the COVID-19 pandemic to limit free speech even further. Social distancing guidelines and crowd size may both be used to limit or refuse controversial speakers.

Students often feel pressure to conform to a college or university's wishes. If they don't, they could be expelled, fail a class or experience other retribution. The college holds all the cards. On most campuses, the burden of proof for guilt in student conduct hearings is "more likely than not," making it very difficult for students to stand up for their rights without legal help.

As an adjunct professor, every student who comes to me for help in finding purpose gets my full support and my active help — even if the students' goals run counter to mine. But I have learned something crucial in my time in this role: It's not the job of an educator to dictate a student's purpose in life. I'm meant to help them achieve their dreams, no matter what.

Conner Drigotas is the Director of Communications and Development at a national law firm and is a Young Voices contributor.