Everyday Cyber Safety Practices

by Spencer Coursen

Recent news has once again shed light onto the ever increasing need to engage your cyber security with the same vigilance as your personal security.  All too often, our own complacency leaves us vulnerable to the exploitation efforts of the less than noble.  You don’t need to be a skilled practitioner of computer science or a tech guru to keep yourself safe.  You just need to know and employ the basics as discussed below:

  • Install strong virus and malware protection for all computers that access social networking sites.  Be sure to update the software whenever possible.  When the pop-up screen for an update is available try to always click “download and install” rather than “remind me later.”  Cyber probes and attacks increase greatly in the timeframe between software updates when they have figured out the old system, but have yet to figure out the new.  Don’t tip the advantage to the favor of your adversary.

  • Passwords should be strong and frequently changed.  It is important to not use the same password for more than one site, nor is it good to keep the same passwords in rotation.  Strong passwords are at least 6 characters long and combine numbers, symbols and letters (in varying case)  Do not use any passwords that contain anything that might be found in a dictionary or which have a personal association i.e.; your SS #,  school sports number (Jordan23) or anything with your day, month, year of birth.  The stronger a password, the more difficult it will be to be guessed or hacked.  4U@7Yu is a much stronger password than pass123word

  • Do not visit unknown websites sent to you via private messages and emails from persons you don’t know know - this also goes for website invites which may seem out of character for those persons you do know.  Your mom is very likely not recommending you buy pharmaceuticals from Korea.  If it seems like a fraud...it’s a fraud.

  • Social Media should never include private information.  Don’t put anything on your social media page you would not be comfortable sharing with everyone.  Privacy settings on websites like Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram and a variety of other social-sharing sites change often.  Familiarize yourself with the site’s privacy settings and be sure take advantage of the options offering you the most privacy.  Pictures of your home, car, and associated geotags are all useful pieces of information a potential hacker may use to exploit your cyber identity.

  • Create unique answers to password recovery questions.  Inevitably we will all at one time or another forget a password.  When setting up your recovery options, it is perfectly acceptably to answer the generic questions with something completely random. These answers are not checked for truthfulness and are simply in place to protect your information from unauthorized attempts at gaining access.  Cyber criminals are quite skilled at finding out the real answers to these password challenge questions from friends, colleagues, or from information you or your online acquaintances have previously posted online.  For the purposes of password recovery,  “Abracadabra” is a perfectly acceptable answer to “What is your mothers maiden name?” Your own imagination is often times your best security option.

  • Do not “jail break” your mobile device.  Doing so requires the user to disable the intrinsic security features of the device which means malicious applications will have access to all facets of information on your phone - regardless of your permission.  Applications downloaded from verified vendors like Apple’s App Store have requirements that help protect the user.  These requirements are bypassed once the jailbreak has taken place, which means the applications will no longer need to ask your permission before granting access to your contacts, GPS location or information associated with other files on your phone, like your pictures, text messages and emails.

  • Do not engage in illegal downloads.  Unlicensed internet services offering free downloads, zip files, or torrents of movies, music and other software packages often contain malicious spyware that is specifically designed to exploit your cyber security.  These illegal downloads are often the main distribution method for delivering a virus or a trojan horse to your system.

  • Create specific email addresses for specific uses.  Avoid using the same email account for all of your internet activity.  Employing task-specific email addresses will reduce your vulnerability by having your activities compartmentalized into those specific email accounts, and will limit the amount of damage any one compromised account can do to your overall cyber security.  There is no limit to email addresses you may create.  Trust me, you’ll still be able to find the friends you want to follow, it just won’t be as easy for them to find you...this is a good thing. Having one email account for Facebook, one for twitter, another for correspondence, and yet another for e-commerce is perfectly acceptable and encouraged.

  • Do not label folders or sub-folders with titles that promote intrigue or interest.  Labels such as “Passwords”  “Bank Account” and “Important” are all specifically targeted items of interest in cyber attacks and probing mechanisms.  Instead, label things with specific meaning to you with names of seemingly unrelated associations.  If you’re favorite dessert is chocolate cake this may be the name of your favorites folder, whereas the food that gives your heartburn may be the appropriately named folder associated with your annoying co-worker.  This practice also works great for the “notes” application on your mobile device.

  • Utilize “Drafts” in an unassociated email account.  With every website requiring a unique sequence of usernames, passwords, and additional log in features, it is often hard to keep track of them all - especially when they are all independently changed at varying intervals. Creating an additional email address known only to you, and then storing this information in a “Draft Email”  will afford you a secure online hiding place for your information that you can access globally.

  • Log out of accounts when done.  You don’t have to shut down your computer, but the simple act of logging out of accounts especially on shared wifi, networks or computers (think Starbucks free wifi) will prevent the unfavorable access of your private information.

Following these everyday practices will reduce your own likelihood of being victimized, and will help you to prepare today for a safer tomorrow.

The critical difference: Rights from the Creator, not the state

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

When politicians claim that rights flow from the state, they pave the way for tyranny.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) recently delivered a lecture that should alarm every American. During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, he argued that believing rights come from a Creator rather than government is the same belief held by Iran’s theocratic regime.

Kaine claimed that the principles underpinning Iran’s dictatorship — the same regime that persecutes Sunnis, Jews, Christians, and other minorities — are also the principles enshrined in our Declaration of Independence.

In America, rights belong to the individual. In Iran, rights serve the state.

That claim exposes either a profound misunderstanding or a reckless indifference to America’s founding. Rights do not come from government. They never did. They come from the Creator, as the Declaration of Independence proclaims without qualification. Jefferson didn’t hedge. Rights are unalienable — built into every human being.

This foundation stands worlds apart from Iran. Its leaders invoke God but grant rights only through clerical interpretation. Freedom of speech, property, religion, and even life itself depend on obedience to the ruling clerics. Step outside their dictates, and those so-called rights vanish.

This is not a trivial difference. It is the essence of liberty versus tyranny. In America, rights belong to the individual. The government’s role is to secure them, not define them. In Iran, rights serve the state. They empower rulers, not the people.

From Muhammad to Marx

The same confusion applies to Marxist regimes. The Soviet Union’s constitutions promised citizens rights — work, health care, education, freedom of speech — but always with fine print. If you spoke out against the party, those rights evaporated. If you practiced religion openly, you were charged with treason. Property and voting were allowed as long as they were filtered and controlled by the state — and could be revoked at any moment. Rights were conditional, granted through obedience.

Kaine seems to be advocating a similar approach — whether consciously or not. By claiming that natural rights are somehow comparable to sharia law, he ignores the critical distinction between inherent rights and conditional privileges. He dismisses the very principle that made America a beacon of freedom.

Jefferson and the founders understood this clearly. “We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights,” they wrote. No government, no cleric, no king can revoke them. They exist by virtue of humanity itself. The government exists to protect them, not ration them.

This is not a theological quibble. It is the entire basis of our government. Confuse the source of rights, and tyranny hides behind piety or ideology. The people are disempowered. Clerics, bureaucrats, or politicians become arbiters of what rights citizens may enjoy.

John Greim / Contributor | Getty Images

Gifts from God, not the state

Kaine’s statement reflects either a profound ignorance of this principle or an ideological bias that favors state power over individual liberty. Either way, Americans must recognize the danger. Understanding the origin of rights is not academic — it is the difference between freedom and submission, between the American experiment and theocratic or totalitarian rule.

Rights are not gifts from the state. They are gifts from God, secured by reason, protected by law, and defended by the people. Every American must understand this. Because when rights come from government instead of the Creator, freedom disappears.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

POLL: Is America’s next generation trading freedom for equity?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

A recent poll conducted by Justin Haskins, a long-time friend of the show, has uncovered alarming trends among young Americans aged 18-39, revealing a generation grappling with deep frustrations over economic hardships, housing affordability, and a perceived rigged system that favors the wealthy, corporations, and older generations. While nearly half of these likely voters approve of President Trump, seeing him as an anti-establishment figure, over 70% support nationalizing major industries, such as healthcare, energy, and big tech, to promote "equity." Shockingly, 53% want a democratic socialist to win the 2028 presidential election, including a third of Trump voters and conservatives in this age group. Many cite skyrocketing housing costs, unfair taxation on the middle class, and a sense of being "stuck" or in crisis as driving forces, with 62% believing the economy is tilted against them and 55% backing laws to confiscate "excess wealth" like second homes or luxury items to help first-time buyers.

This blend of Trump support and socialist leanings suggests a volatile mix: admiration for disruptors who challenge the status quo, coupled with a desire for radical redistribution to address personal struggles. Yet, it raises profound questions about the roots of this discontent—Is it a failure of education on history's lessons about socialism's failures? Media indoctrination? Or genuine systemic barriers? And what does it portend for the nation’s trajectory—greater division, a shift toward authoritarian policies, or an opportunity for renewal through timeless values like hard work and individual responsibility?

Glenn wants to know what YOU think: Where do Gen Z's socialist sympathies come from? What does it mean for the future of America? Make your voice heard in the poll below:

Do you believe the Gen Z support for socialism comes from perceived economic frustrations like unaffordable housing and a rigged system favoring the wealthy and corporations?

Do you believe the Gen Z support for socialism, including many Trump supporters, is due to a lack of education about the historical failures of socialist systems?

Do you think that these poll results indicate a growing generational divide that could lead to more political instability and authoritarian tendencies in America's future?

Do you think that this poll implies that America's long-term stability relies on older generations teaching Gen Z and younger to prioritize self-reliance, free-market ideals, and personal accountability?

Do you think the Gen Z support for Trump is an opportunity for conservatives to win them over with anti-establishment reforms that preserve liberty?

Americans expose Supreme Court’s flag ruling as a failed relic

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

In a nation where the Stars and Stripes symbolize the blood-soaked sacrifices of our heroes, President Trump's executive order to crack down on flag desecration amid violent protests has ignited fierce debate. But in a recent poll, Glenn asked the tough question: Can Trump protect the Flag without TRAMPLING free speech? Glenn asked, and you answered—thousands weighed in on this pressing clash between free speech and sacred symbols.

The results paint a picture of resounding distrust toward institutional leniency. A staggering 85% of respondents support banning the burning of American flags when it incites violence or disturbs the peace, a bold rejection of the chaos we've seen from George Floyd riots to pro-Palestinian torchings. Meanwhile, 90% insist that protections for burning other flags—like Pride or foreign banners—should not be treated the same as Old Glory under the First Amendment, exposing the hypocrisy in equating our nation's emblem with fleeting symbols. And 82% believe the Supreme Court's Texas v. Johnson ruling, shielding flag burning as "symbolic speech," should not stand without revision—can the official story survive such resounding doubt from everyday Americans weary of government inaction?

Your verdict sends a thunderous message: In this divided era, the flag demands defense against those who exploit freedoms to sow disorder, without trampling the liberties it represents. It's a catastrophic failure of the establishment to ignore this groundswell.

Want to make your voice heard? Check out more polls HERE.

Labor Day EXPOSED: The Marxist roots you weren’t told about

JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

During your time off this holiday, remember the man who started it: Peter J. McGuire, a racist Marxist who co-founded America’s first socialist party.

Labor Day didn’t begin as a noble tribute to American workers. It began as a negotiation with ideological terrorists.

In the late 1800s, factory and mine conditions were brutal. Workers endured 12-to-15-hour days, often seven days a week, in filthy, dangerous environments. Wages were low, injuries went uncompensated, and benefits didn’t exist. Out of desperation, Americans turned to labor unions. Basic protections had to be fought for because none were guaranteed.

Labor Day wasn’t born out of gratitude. It was a political payoff to Marxist radicals who set trains ablaze and threatened national stability.

That era marked a seismic shift — much like today. The Industrial Revolution, like our current digital and political upheaval, left millions behind. And wherever people get left behind, Marxists see an opening.

A revolutionary wedge

This was Marxism’s moment.

Economic suffering created fertile ground for revolutionary agitation. Marxists, socialists, and anarchists stepped in to stoke class resentment. Their goal was to turn the downtrodden into a revolutionary class, tear down the existing system, and redistribute wealth by force.

Among the most influential agitators was Peter J. McGuire, a devout Irish Marxist from New York. In 1874, he co-founded the Social Democratic Workingmens Party of North America, the first Marxist political party in the United States. He was also a vice president of the American Federation of Labor, which would become the most powerful union in America.

McGuire’s mission wasn’t hidden. He wanted to transform the U.S. into a socialist nation through labor unions.

That mission soon found a useful symbol.

In the 1880s, labor leaders in Toronto invited McGuire to attend their annual labor festival. Inspired, he returned to New York and launched a similar parade on Sept. 5 — chosen because it fell halfway between Independence Day and Thanksgiving.

The first parade drew over 30,000 marchers who skipped work to hear speeches about eight-hour workdays and the alleged promise of Marxism. The parade caught on across the country.

Negotiating with radicals

By 1894, Labor Day had been adopted by 30 states. But the federal government had yet to make it a national holiday. A major strike changed everything.

In Pullman, Illinois, home of the Pullman railroad car company, tensions exploded. The economy tanked. George Pullman laid off hundreds of workers and slashed wages for those who remained — yet refused to lower the rent on company-owned homes.

That injustice opened the door for Marxist agitators to mobilize.

Sympathetic railroad workers joined the strike. Riots broke out. Hundreds of railcars were torched. Mail service was disrupted. The nation’s rail system ground to a halt.

President Grover Cleveland — under pressure in a midterm election year — panicked. He sent 12,000 federal troops to Chicago. Two strikers were killed in the resulting clashes.

With the crisis spiraling and Democrats desperate to avoid political fallout, Cleveland struck a deal. Within six days of breaking the strike, Congress rushed through legislation making Labor Day a federal holiday.

It was the first of many concessions Democrats would make to organized labor in exchange for political power.

What we really celebrated

Labor Day wasn’t born out of gratitude. It was a political payoff to Marxist radicals who set trains ablaze and threatened national stability.

Kean Collection / Staff | Getty Images

What we celebrated was a Canadian idea, brought to America by the founder of the American Socialist Party, endorsed by racially exclusionary unions, and made law by a president and Congress eager to save face.

It was the first of many bones thrown by the Democratic Party to union power brokers. And it marked the beginning of a long, costly compromise with ideologues who wanted to dismantle the American way of life — from the inside out.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.