What?!: Anthony Weiner's online girlfriend claims "he's not the man I thought he was."

Sydney Leathers, Anthony Weiner's newly discovered "sexting" partner, has spoken out. And — warning this may [not] break your heart — Anthony Weiner is not the man she thought he was.

Shocking? Actually…yes.

"Who did she think he was?" Stu asked stunned.

Great question considering he was the guy cheating on his wife with her over the internet with explicit messages and grotesque "selfless" that would embarrass the likes of Geraldo Rivera.

Surely she didn't think the guy lying to his wife, his constituents, his child…and well most other people he came in contact with was supposedly an honest individual.

"I guess she thought he was worse that that?" Pat questioned

"What is it that he didn't deliver for you that you already knew about him?" Pat added.

The sad fact is, he is exactly the dirtbag America already knew he was. Even if Leathers was somehow misled that their relationship was more than just an Internet-based/sexting fling, it was public knowledge this is something Anthony Weiner does.

As New Yorkers are jumping off the Weiner bandwagon (thank God), no one is buying her 'sweet, little-miss-innocent' act.

"You don't get to do that now, especially after all the stuff you've discussed with him, after we've all seen what you had to say," Pat noted.

"By the way, the only reason we saw it is because you told us about it," Stu pointed out of Leathers.

At 24-years-old, the sympathy act is definitely not going to work with the American public — especially with New Yorkers. In fact, she initiated the relationship with a Facebook message almost immediately after he left office for the first scandal. She knew what she was getting herself into, Stu noted.

"I've got to say, I'm not a defender of Anthony Weiner here, but he seems to be exactly the person she should have thought he was. I mean, he told you specifically who he was," Stu said, referring to one of the internet exchanges the two had where Weiner described himself as "an argumentative, perpetually horny, middle-aged man."

"She's the only person in the world he didn't lie to!" Pat added sharply. "It's amazing. And now she says if she could speak with him (good luck with that), her message would be to stop lying and embarrassing his wife. To get help."

She cares about his wife? Is anyone buying this?

It's amazing to think that a 24-year-old woman who would get involved with a married man has the gaul to think that informed adults would believe she is somehow a victim.

"This is the culture we're in right now," Stu said. "You're allowed to stay on your mommy and daddy's healthcare until you're 26 years old now and we're supposed to think that no one has any responsibility for their actions until they turn, I don't know, 60, 70?  And at that point you're not ‑‑ now you're just elderly or something and you're not allowed to make decisions there, either.  This society has taken all responsibility out of the people who make decisions and tried to put it on other people."

COVID is back! Or that is what we’re being told anyway...

A recent spike in COVID cases has triggered the left's alarm bells, and the following institutions have begun to reinstate COVID-era mandates. You might want to avoid them if you enjoy breathing freely...

Do YOU think institutions should bring back COVID-era mandates if cases increase? Let us know your thoughts HERE.

Morris Brown College

Both of Upstate Medical's hospitals in Syracuse, New York

Corey Henry / Senior Staff Photographer | The Daily Orange

Auburn Community Hospital, New York

Kevin Rivoli / The Citizen | Auburn Pub

Lionsgate Studio

AaronP/Bauer-Griffin / Contributor | GETTY IMAGES

United Health Services in New York

Kaiser Permanente in California

Justin Sullivan / Staff | GETTY IMAGES

There was a time when both the Left and the Right agreed that parents have the final say in raising their children... Not anymore.

In the People's Republic of California, the STATE, not parents, will determine whether children should undergo transgender treatments. The California state legislature just passed a law that will require judges in child custody cases to consider whether parents support a child’s gender transition. According to the law, the state now thinks total affirmation is an integral part of a child’s “health, safety, and welfare.”

We are inching closer to a dystopia where the state, not the parents, have ultimate rights over their children, a history that people from former Soviet nations would feign repeating.

Glenn dove into the law AND MORE in this episode titled, "Parental Advisory: The EXPLICIT plot to control YOUR kids." To get all the research that went into this episode AND information on how YOU can fight back, enter your email address below:

If you didn't catch Wednesday night's Glenn TV special, be sure to check it out HERE!

The Biden admin has let in MORE illegal aliens than the populations of THESE 15 states

GUILLERMO ARIAS / Contributor | Getty Images

There are currently an estimated 16.8 MILLION illegal aliens residing in the United States as of June 2023, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). This number is already 1.3 million higher than FAIR's January 2022 estimate of 15.5 million and a 2.3 million increase from its end-of-2020 estimate. Even Democrats like New York City's Mayor Adams Mayor Adams are waking up to what Conservatives have been warning for years: we are in a border CRISIS.

However, this isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010. In the first two years of the Biden administration alone, the illegal alien population increased by 16 PERCENT nationwide, imposing a whopping net cost of $150.6 BILLION PER YEAR on American taxpayers. That is nearly DOUBLE the total amount that the Biden administration has sent to Ukraine.

This isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010.

These large numbers often make it difficult to conceptualize the sheer impact of illegal immigration on the United States. To put it in perspective, we have listed ALL 15 states and the District of Colombia that have smaller populations than the 2.3 MILLION illegal immigrants, who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration. That is more than the entire populations of Wyoming, Vermont, and South Dakota COMBINED—and the American taxpayers have to pay the price.

Here are all 16 states/districts that have FEWER people than the illegal immigrants who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration.

1. New Mexico

Population: 2,110,011

2. Idaho

Population: 1,973,752

3. Nebraska

Population: 1,972,292

4. West Virginia

Population: 1,764,786

5. Hawaii

Population: 1,433,238

6. New Hampshire

Population: 1,402,957

7. Maine

Population: 1,393,442

8. Montana

Population: 1,139,507

9. Rhode Island

Population: 1,090,483

10. Delaware

Population: 1,031,985

11. South Dakota

Population: 923,484

12. North Dakota

Population: 780,588

13. Alaska

Population: 732,984

14. Washington DC

Population: 674,815

15. Vermont

Population: 647,156

16. Wyoming

Population: 583,279

POLL: Should the Government control the future of AI?

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

Earlier this week, tech titans, lawmakers, and union leaders met on Capitol Hill to discuss the future of AI regulation. The three-hour meeting boasted an impressive roster of tech leaders including, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and others, along with more than 60 US Senators.

Tech Titans and Senators gathered in the Kennedy Caucus Room.The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

The meeting was closed to the public, so what was exactly discussed is unknown. However, what we do know is that a majority of the CEOs support AI regulation, the most vocal of which is Elon Musk. During the meeting, Musk called AI "a double-edged sword" and strongly pushed for regulation in the interest of public safety.

A majority of the CEOs support AI regulation.

Many other related issues were discussed, including the disruption AI has caused to the job market. As Glenn has discussed on his program, the potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real, and many have already felt the effects. From taxi drivers to Hollywood actors and writers, AI's presence can be felt everywhere and lawmakers are unsure how to respond.

The potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real.

Ultimately, the meeting's conclusion was less than decisive, with several Senators making comments to the tune of "we need more time before we act." The White House is expected to release an executive order regarding AI regulation by the end of the year. But now it's YOUR turn to tell us what YOU think needs to be done!

Should A.I. be regulated?

Can the government be trusted with the power to regulate A.I.? 

Can Silicon Valley be trusted to regulate AI? 

Should AI development be slowed for safety, despite its potential advantages?

If a job can be done cheaper and better by AI, should it be taken away from a human?

Do you feel that your job is threatened by AI?