Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Someone produced a country song promoting Hillary Clinton and it’s worse than you could imagine

December 05, 2014
Radio Clips

The Glenn Beck Program

Somewhere, someone thought a really good way to promote Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign would be to create a country song about how wonderful Hillary Clinton is and spread it around the internet. It is infinitely more horrible than anything you could possibly imagine. Brace yourself and listen to it along with Glenn’s reaction!

GLENN: Welcome to the program. We have — stop the music, because the real piece of music here for you. This came in yesterday. And Tania and I — I played it for Tania without — without telling her what it was, and she looked up at me halfway through and she laughed and she said, is this you guys?

(laughing).

GLENN: And I said, no, honey, this is not us doing a parody. This is serious, a new song for the Hillary campaign. Listen to this.

(music).

GLENN: By the way, when I hear country music —

PAT: You think Hillary immediately.

GLENN: I think of Hillary Clinton immediately.

(laughing).

(music playing)

(singing)

GLENN: This is so bad.

(singing).

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Stop.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Stop. Let's put our boots on. Guys, let's put our boots on and bash this glass ceiling.

JEFFY: Yeah.

GLENN: This is —

PAT: Wait, you're bashing in a glass ceiling with your boots?

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: So —

GLENN: Don't think about it. They spray painted 2016 on glass. So it's guys, let's bash this glass ceiling for women.

JEFFY: Yeah.

PAT: It's time to elect a woman.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

PAT: In the 21st —

GLENN: What's amazing is how — how bogus this whole thing is. We were looking — what the world is striving for, they're starving for anything that is authentic. They are so sick of all of the make-believe bull crap. You can see it a million miles away. This shows you how out of touch the people in the Clinton campaign are. They are — even if Hillary said I didn't have anything to do with this song. The people who are behind Hillary, that they would think that you could pull this off. It is so far out of — out of their comfort zone. Does anybody think — remember when Hillary did that speech, and she's like, well, I just here because I'm tired. You're like, what was that?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: They just think they can wear any mask and it will be okay. And people will buy it. Is.

JEFFY: So is this entitled cowgirl kankles or —

GLENN: Stop it. Go ahead.

(singing).

PAT: She's a living wife? Is she — you never see her and Bill together. Where do you get? And through it all she's a living wife. I never seen a couple more in love than Bill and Hill. What are you talking about?

(laughing).

PAT: Where does that come from?

(singing).

GLENN: Unbelievable. She fights for country and family. Like she fought for the — like she fought for the families of the Benghazi victims?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Like that — is that how she was fighting?

(singing).

PAT: This is so bad.

GLENN: It's hysterical.

PAT: Oh, man.

GLENN: It's hysterical.

JEFFY: Is this on the charts yet?

(singing).

PAT: Or if you drive a truck or not, because I know that has to be in one of them country songs. Trying to emulate —

GLENN: It's so bad. Whether you live in a red or blue state, it's 2016, let's get to the polls.

(laughing).

GLENN: It's awful.

(singing).

GLENN: There's some what, honchos —

PAT: There's hard —

GLENN: Hard choices.

PAT: That need to be made.

GLENN: Buy her book by the same name.

(laughing).

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. And there's hard choices to be made.

PAT: Oh.

(singing).

GLENN: Wait, stop. We need a leader who's tough and gritty.

PAT: Gritty.

GLENN: Not gritty, ready.

PAT: I thought it was ready.

GLENN: Because her deal is ready. We need a leader that's tough and ready.

PAT: Ready.

(singing).

GLENN: That's my final decision.

(singing).

GLENN: Stop. There was a great comment on the Facebook page last night. You have to read my Facebook comments on this. They are so funny. The Facebook comments came in. They were all observations like, notice whenever he says that she's — through it all she's a loving wife, they had to go back and find the pictures from like 1964.

(laughing).

PAT: You can't find them even together anymore.

GLENN: No, you have to go back to the Yale pictures.

JEFFY: They were just photographed in the Hamptons together not long ago, right?

PAT: Like a year ago on vacation?

JEFFY: Yeah.

PAT: Walking about the beach —

GLENN: Let's be honest. They're in their 60s.

JEFFY: I thought they looked okay. Hillary didn't cover up the kankles like he should have.

GLENN: Is to have.

(laughing).

GLENN: You have, I have to hand it to Hillary and any woman who will age gracefully in today's world. You know, stop trying with a plastic surgery and stop trying to look like you're 20 years old.

JEFFY: Joe Biden job Joe Biden.

GLENN: Joe Biden. He's honestly —

JEFFY: Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: He's starting to look Asian. His skin is pulled back so much his eyes are starting to look Asian. Stop it. That's creeping me out. How vain do you have to be? Let's give Hillary some credit. She's not trying to act like she's 40 years old. She's in her 60s. Good for her. I met Steve Forbes' wife. We were having dinner and Steve Forbes' wife was sitting next to me. When you think of really, really rich, really, really rich people, and their wife, what do you expect their wife too long like?

PAT: Plastic.

GLENN: His wife looked like — like I remember — and I don't mean this to be rude, but she's an older lady now. She's in her 70s. She looked like my grandmother. And I love that. She wasn't trying to hide her gray hair. She hadn't had plastic surgery. She was a normal human being. And I have so much respect for her. I mean, I loved that. And you have to hand it to Hillary. She's not trying to make herself look, you know, younger.

PAT: No, but if she did, I think she'd be — there would be some notice of that and it would probably be embarrassing for her. There might be some ulterior motive not to do anything or she just may not want to. I don't know.

GLENN: Maybe she's comfortable in her own skin.

PAT: She might, yeah. She might be. She'd get some flack from the right if —

GLENN: She would but she wouldn't get it from the left.

PAT: Not at all.

GLENN: Nobody is saying a word about Joe Biden.

JEFFY: No.

GLENN: That would be a joke. That should be a big joke everywhere.

JEFFY: Nobody said a word about Pelosi forever, right?

GLENN: Right. If — if — you know, you're doing a comedy show, you start to notice the things like Joe Biden eyes going — he has not a wrinkle in his face now. He's completely Botoxed out and his eyes are positively pulled back. You start to make fun of that. But nobody is saying anything about it. It just shows how in touch — take us out on the Hillary song.

(singing).

PAT: Aah — yeah. Hillary.

(singing).

PAT: She let four Americans die in Benghazi without lifting a finger. So did the entire administration. We need four more years of this. It's time to stand up for this woman who's so in love with the man who keeps cheating on her.

JEFFY: Can I get an amen.

GLENN: And if you don't like her, let's vote for Jeb.

(laughing).

GLENN: Bush or Hillary.

PAT: So awful.

GLENN: We should do a country song — we should do an R and B song for Jeb.

PAT: That would be —

GLENN: Because when I think of Jeb Bush, I think R and B. When I think of Hillary, I think of country music. When I think of Jeff Jeb, I think of R and B.

PAT: Let's do that. That let's do that. That would be fun.

(laughing).

GLENN: Whoo. Is that bad?

PAT: They're on to something there.

The Woodrow Wilson strategy to get out of Mother’s Day

Stock Montage / Contributor, Xinhua News Agency / Contributor | Getty Images

I’ve got a potentially helpful revelation that’s gonna blow the lid off your plans for this Sunday. It’s Mother’s Day.

Yeah, that sacred day where you’re guilt-tripped into buying flowers, braving crowded brunch buffets, and pretending you didn’t forget to mail the card. But what if I told you… you don’t have to do it? That’s right, there’s a loophole, a get-out-of-Mother’s-Day-free card, and it’s stamped with the name of none other than… Woodrow Wilson (I hate that guy).

Back in 1914, ol’ Woody Wilson signed a proclamation that officially made Mother’s Day a national holiday. Second Sunday in May, every year. He said it was a day to “publicly express our love and reverence for the mothers of our country.” Sounds sweet, right? Until you peel back the curtain.

See, Wilson wasn’t some sentimental guy sitting around knitting doilies for his mom. No, no, no. This was a calculated move.

The idea for Mother’s Day had been floating around for decades, pushed by influential voices like Julia Ward Howe. By 1911, states were jumping on the bandwagon, but it took Wilson to make it federal. Why? Because he was a master of optics. This guy loved big, symbolic gestures to distract from the real stuff he was up to, like, oh, I don’t know, reshaping the entire federal government!

So here’s the deal: if you’re looking for an excuse to skip Mother’s Day, just lean into this. Say, “Sorry, Mom, I’m not celebrating a holiday cooked up by Woodrow Wilson!” I mean, think about it – this is the guy who gave us the Federal Reserve, the income tax, and don’t even get me started on his assault on basic liberties during World War I. You wanna trust THAT guy with your Sunday plans? I don’t think so! You tell your mom, “Look, I love you, but I’m not observing a Progressive holiday. I’m keeping my brunch money in protest.”

Now, I know what you might be thinking.

“Glenn, my mom’s gonna kill me if I try this.” Fair point. Moms can be scary. But hear me out: you can spin this. Tell her you’re honoring her EVERY DAY instead of some government-mandated holiday. You don’t need Wilson’s permission to love your mom! You can bake her a cake in June, call her in July, or, here’s a wild idea, visit her WITHOUT a Woodrow Wilson federal proclamation guilting you into it.

Shocking Christian massacres unveiled

Aldara Zarraoa / Contributor | Getty Images

Is a Christian Genocide unfolding overseas?

Recent reports suggest an alarming escalation in violence against Christians, raising questions about whether these acts constitute genocide under international law. Recently, Glenn hosted former U.S. Army Special Forces Sniper Tim Kennedy, who discussed a predictive model that forecasts a surge in global Christian persecution for the summer of 2025.

From Africa to Asia and the Middle East, extreme actions—some described as genocidal—have intensified over the past year. Over 380 million Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution, a number that continues to climb. With rising international concern, the United Nations and human rights groups are urging protective measures by the global community. Is a Christian genocide being waged in the far corners of the globe? Where are they taking place, and what is being done?

India: Hindu Extremist Violence Escalates

Yawar Nazir / Contributor | Getty Images

In India, attacks on Christians have surged as Hindu extremist groups gain influence within the country. In February 2025, Hindu nationalist leader Aadesh Soni organized a 50,000-person rally in Chhattisgarh, where he called for the rape and murder of all Christians in nearby villages and demanded the execution of Christian leaders to erase Christianity. Other incidents include forced conversions, such as a June 2024 attack in Chhattisgarh, where a Hindu mob gave Christian families a 10-day ultimatum to convert to Hinduism. In December 2024, a Christian man in Uttar Pradesh was attacked, forcibly converted, and paraded while the mob chanted "Death to Jesus."

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommends designating India a "Country of Particular Concern" and imposing targeted sanctions on those perpetrating these attacks. The international community is increasingly alarmed by the rising tide of religious violence in India.

Syria: Sectarian Violence Post-Regime Change

LOUAI BESHARA / Contributor | Getty Images

Following the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, Syria has seen a wave of sectarian violence targeting religious minorities, including Christians, with over 1,000 killed in early 2025. It remains unclear whether Christians are deliberately targeted or caught in broader conflicts, but many fear persecution by the new regime or extremist groups. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a dominant rebel group and known al-Qaeda splinter group now in power, is known for anti-Christian sentiments, heightening fears of increased persecution.

Christians, especially converts from Islam, face severe risks in the unstable post-regime environment. The international community is calling for humanitarian aid and protection for Syria’s vulnerable minority communities.

Democratic Republic of Congo: A "Silent Genocide"

Hugh Kinsella Cunningham / Stringer | Getty Images

In February 2025, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS-affiliated group, beheaded 70 Christians—men, women, and children—in a Protestant church in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, after tying their hands. This horrific massacre, described as a "silent genocide" reminiscent of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, has shocked the global community.

Since 1996, the ADF and other militias have killed over six million people, with Christians frequently targeted. A Christmas 2024 attack killed 46, further decimating churches in the region. With violence escalating, humanitarian organizations are urging immediate international intervention to address the crisis.

POLL: Starbase exposed: Musk’s vision or corporate takeover?

MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor | Getty Images

Is Starbase the future of innovation or a step too far?

Elon Musk’s ambitious Starbase project in South Texas is reshaping Boca Chica into a cutting-edge hub for SpaceX’s Starship program, promising thousands of jobs and a leap toward Mars colonization. Supporters see Musk as a visionary, driving economic growth and innovation in a historically underserved region. However, local critics, including Brownsville residents and activists, argue that SpaceX’s presence raises rents, restricts beach access, and threatens environmental harm, with Starbase’s potential incorporation as a city sparking fears of unchecked corporate control. As pro-Musk advocates clash with anti-Musk skeptics, will Starbase unite the community or deepen the divide?

Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Is Starbase’s development a big win for South Texas?  

Should Starbase become its own city?  

Is Elon Musk’s vision more of a benefit than a burden for the region?

Shocking truth behind Trump-Zelenskyy mineral deal unveiled

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have finalized a landmark agreement that will shape the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations. The agreement focuses on mineral access and war recovery.

After a tense March meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy signed a deal on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, granting the U.S. preferential mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for continued military support. Glenn analyzed an earlier version of the agreement in March, when Zelenskyy rejected it, highlighting its potential benefits for America, Ukraine, and Europe. Glenn praised the deal’s strategic alignment with U.S. interests, including reducing reliance on China for critical minerals and fostering regional peace.

However, the agreement signed this week differs from the March proposal Glenn praised. Negotiations led to significant revisions, reflecting compromises on both sides. What changes were made? What did each leader seek, and what did they achieve? How will this deal impact the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations and global geopolitics? Below, we break down the key aspects of the agreement.

What did Trump want?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump aimed to curb what many perceive as Ukraine’s overreliance on U.S. aid while securing strategic advantages for America. His primary goals included obtaining reimbursement for the billions in military aid provided to Ukraine, gaining exclusive access to Ukraine’s valuable minerals (such as titanium, uranium, and lithium), and reducing Western dependence on China for critical resources. These minerals are essential for aerospace, energy, and technology sectors, and Trump saw their acquisition as a way to bolster U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. Additionally, he sought to advance peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, positioning the U.S. as a key mediator.

Ultimately, Trump secured preferential—but not exclusive—rights to extract Ukraine’s minerals through the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, as outlined in the agreement. The U.S. will not receive reimbursement for past aid, but future military contributions will count toward the joint fund, designed to support Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Zelenskyy’s commitment to peace negotiations under U.S. leadership aligns with Trump’s goal of resolving the conflict, giving him leverage in discussions with Russia.

These outcomes partially meet Trump’s objectives. The preferential mineral rights strengthen U.S. access to critical resources, but the lack of exclusivity and reimbursement limits the deal’s financial benefits. The peace commitment, however, positions Trump as a central figure in shaping the war’s resolution, potentially enhancing his diplomatic influence.

What did Zelenskyy want?

Global Images Ukraine / Contributor | Getty Images

Zelenskyy sought to sustain U.S. military and economic support without the burden of repaying past aid, which has been critical for Ukraine’s defense against Russia. He also prioritized reconstruction funds to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn economy and infrastructure. Security guarantees from the U.S. to deter future Russian aggression were a key demand, though controversial, as they risked entangling America in long-term commitments. Additionally, Zelenskyy aimed to retain control over Ukraine’s mineral wealth to safeguard national sovereignty and align with the country’s European Union membership aspirations.

The final deal delivered several of Zelenskyy’s priorities. The reconstruction fund, supported by future U.S. aid, provides a financial lifeline for Ukraine’s recovery without requiring repayment of past assistance. Ukraine retained ownership of its subsoil and decision-making authority over mineral extraction, granting only preferential access to the U.S. However, Zelenskyy conceded on security guarantees, a significant compromise, and agreed to pursue peace talks under Trump’s leadership, which may involve territorial or political concessions to Russia.

Zelenskyy’s outcomes reflect a delicate balance. The reconstruction fund and retained mineral control bolster Ukraine’s economic and sovereign interests, but the absence of security guarantees and pressure to negotiate peace could strain domestic support and challenge Ukraine’s long-term stability.

What does this mean for the future?

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

While Trump didn’t secure all his demands, the deal advances several of his broader strategic goals. By gaining access to Ukraine’s mineral riches, the U.S. undermines China’s dominance over critical elements like lithium and graphite, essential for technology and energy industries. This shift reduces American and European dependence on Chinese supply chains, strengthening Western industrial and tech sectors. Most significantly, the agreement marks a pivotal step toward peace in Europe. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which has claimed thousands of lives, is a top priority for Trump, and Zelenskyy’s commitment to U.S.-led peace talks enhances Trump’s leverage in negotiations with Russia. Notably, the deal avoids binding U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s long-term defense, preserving flexibility for future administrations.

The deal’s broader implications align with the vision Glenn outlined in March, when he praised its potential to benefit America, Ukraine, and Europe by securing resources and creating peace. While the final agreement differs from Glenn's hopes, it still achieves key goals he outlined.