How Putin is following Hitler's playbook

These notes were put together by researchers for The Glenn Beck Program. 

Watch the full episode of The Root on demand on TheBlaze TV. Get all the details HERE.

In 2014 the map as we knew it changed.

Two conflicts played out within 4 months of each other. On February 27th Russia began a special operations ground invasion of Crimea. Annexing it fully just two weeks later. Russia’s ground invasion of Eastern Ukraine would follow soon after. On June 28th ISIS head Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declared himself Caliph Ibrahim of the Islamic State Caliphate. The border between Iraq and Syria would be dissolved. As it was in Europe, just across the Black Sea, the map was suddenly unstable.

Both conflicts have the capability to bring the entire world into conflict. The likes of which we haven’t seen since the 1930’s. In fact, the similarities between Nazi National Socialism and what’s currently taking place in Eastern Europe and the Middle East is striking. Ethnic fascism in Russia and Islamic Fascism in the Middle East. Why can’t the world properly identify what we’re seeing now? Has fear of what’s staring us directly in the face forced us to seek appeasement with men like Putin, Baghdadi and Khamenei?

For Europe, the return of ethnic fascism to Russia is all the more tragic. A continent that lost millions of lives in world war to expel this evil ideology and halt it’s greedy desire to expand its territory is now watching with bated breath to see what Putin does next. What’s going on currently in Russia and Ukraine is eerily similar to 1938. The result back then ultimately would be World War 2.

On March 12, 1938 Nazi Germany in direct defiance of the Versailles Treaty annexed Austria. For the first time since 1919 the map of Europe had been unlocked. The world collectively held their breath wondering what would happen next.

Just two weeks after the Austrian Anschluss Hitler called a secret meeting with Konrad Henlein, the head of the pro-Nazi party SdP (Sudeten German Party) in Czechoslovakia. The message was clear. Leverage the large number of ethnic Germans in western Czechoslovakia and accuse the Czechoslovakian government of oppression against them.

"I am asking neither that Germany be allowed to oppress three and a half million Frenchmen, nor am I asking that three and a half million Englishmen be placed at our mercy. Rather I am simply demanding that the oppression of three and a half million Germans in Czechoslovakia cease and that the inalienable right to self-determination take its place." - Adolf Hitler's speech at the NSDAP Congress 1938

Hitler ordered Henlein to make demands from the government so large that they’d never agree to them. When they didn’t, the Sudeten Germans were to revolt.

It was a clear act of aggression that threatened to unlock the European map even further. The world knew exactly what Hitler wanted. He wanted not only Western Sudeten Czechoslovakia….he wanted the entire country. If this occurred Poland would soon be vulnerable to Germany not only from the West but also from the South.

Czechoslovakian President Edvard Benes was in an impossible situation. He had a modern and capable army, but alone against Germany he had no chance. Also, the Sudeten part of the country contained the majority of Czechoslovakian industry. It was the backbone of their economy. If the Sudetenland was amalgamated by Germany their economy would collapse.

Hitler raised tensions further by ordering 750,000 German troops to the border as an “army exercise”. He called Czechoslovakia a fraudulent state, and that it was in violation of international law by denying the Germans in the Sudeten the right to self-determination. Benes in desperation pleaded with England and France to offer their support should Germany decide to follow this all the way through.

The story is well known. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain flew to Germany desperately seeking “Peace for our time”. Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler would go down in history as a foreign policy that enabled a homicidal mad man. What’s not as well known is the depth of Chamberlains denial in the face of Nazi fascism. This story has a much deeper back end. Most think that Chamberlain was justified in his actions because he didn’t know just how crazy Hitler was. Is that accurate?

The Oster Conspiracy

SOURCE: The Oster Conspiracy of 1938: The Unknown Story of the Military Plot to Kill Hitler and Avert World War II

Lieutenant Colonel Hans Oster of the German Office of Military Intelligence had watched Hitler’s rise from inside since the beginning. To those outside Germany Hitler’s propaganda seemed hard to believe. Like Islamic terrorists today. When Osama Bin Laden threatened to attack New York City no one gave it much credit. Intense racial hatred and the idea of a mass global Jewish conspiracy doesn’t sound rational to most of us. Hans Oster however knew exactly what Hitler was capable of. He had listened to his speeches and witnessed him back them up first hand.

In what would later be called the Oster Conspiracy, he began to gather like minded individuals from all over the German military. He made additional contacts in the foreign office, the Secretary of State, and many others. The idea was to have a plan in place to depose Hitler and reinstate the monarchy of Kaiser Wilhelm II that was in exile in the Netherlands.

In March 1938 Oster’s plans accelerated. The Austrian anschluss and the Sudeten crisis in Czechoslovakia made it obvious what Hitler wanted to do. Oster activated a contact of his in the foreign office, Theodor Kordt, who was currently stationed in London with the German Ambassador. Kordt called a secret meeting with Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax to inform the British what Hitler was up to and to let them know that a plan was in place to depose him.

September 1938...Oster’s plan is in motion. Winston Churchill predicted that after Oster’s coup a new system of government could be in place within 48 hours. The English appeared to be on board. That meant the French would fall in line as well. Oster’s troops were stationed in buildings at strategic points all over Berlin waiting for the go order. They were ready.

On September 29th Chamberlain gave in to Hitler. They decided to hand the Nazis the Sudetenland without even consulting Czechoslovakia. Britain and France told Benes that if they didn’t respect the Munich Agreement they would have to resist Germany on their own. With no other option he capitulated.

The German army would fully occupy the Sudetenland in October. The map was unlocked. This set off a tidal wave of border disputes. Poland invaded and annexed portions of Czechoslovakia it lost in 1919. Hungary annexed Carpathian Ruthenia in Slovakia. Germany eventually rolls completely through Czechoslovakia occupying it entirely. Less than a year later the entire European map would unravel.

Europe was so terrified of another war that they were willing to appease and ultimately enable a mad man. Churchill made this statement after the Munich Agreement was signed:

“And do not suppose that this is the end. This is only the beginning of the reckoning. This is only the first sip, the first foretaste of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us year by year unless by a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigour, we arise again and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.”

It makes it all the worse that the British knew full well of the Oster Conspiracy and what Hitler was actually up to. Fear and a lack of courage to call Hitler the evil fascist that he was ultimately caused that fear to become reality. As Churchill accurately predicted, it was “only the beginning of the reckoning”.

Compare March 1938 to March 2014. The situation is almost an exact match. Like Hitler’s March 12 1938 anschluss of Austria, Putin’s “anschluss” of Crimea would take place less than a week apart on March 18. Motivated by ideals of spreading Russian racial and cultural superiority and liberating their Orthodox holy land Putin’s “little green men” swiftly took over the peninsula.

Not long after the annexation of Crimea ethnic Russians in Eastern Ukraine began to arm themselves and riot. Vladimir Putin claimed he would act in the interest of ethnic Russians in Ukraine and sent thousands of troops to the border as an “army exercise”. He then began publically funneling non-lethal aid into the country without Ukrainian approval. Covertly he also began funneling in troops and sophisticated weapons.

Eastern Ukraine, like the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, is also the main industrial hub in Ukraine. The economic backbone of the country. If Eastern Ukraine falls to the Russians the Ukrainian economy faces collapse.

Sound familiar? This fascist playbook has been used before.

Just like it had been done in 1938, the map was being unlocked. The border areas in Eastern Ukraine became unstable. Other border areas in Moldova and Georgia began to wonder if they were next on Putin’s list. Are they? On March 5, 2015 Russia deployed thousands of troops to the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and Moldova in Georgia. The reasoning? An “army exercise”. Will Russia completely roll through Ukraine just like Hitler eventually did to Czechoslovakia? That could eventually be the trigger that unlocks the European map once more leading to full on world war.

As if expecting this to actually happen Putin has been reaching out to radical groups on both the left and right all over Europe. Anyone that is against the EU/US alliance structure has become a potential ally. Examples are Russian support for right winger Marine Le Pen and her National Front party in France. On the opposite end of the political spectrum is Russian support for the far left wing Syriza government in Greece and the Podemos Party in Spain. All three have already declared support for Putin’s Russia.

As the economic crisis in the European Union continues more of it’s members are becoming impatient with Germany. Germany on the other hand is getting impatient with certain members of the EU. As the economies in Italy, Greece and Spain continue to decline Germany, as the EU’s economic powerhouse, has had to write the majority of the bailout checks. It’s unsustainable and it won’t last. The European alliance structure could be on the verge of falling apart.

The timing of the splintering of the European Union and Russia’s military moves in Eastern Europe is significant. The former enables the latter. The more Western Europe weakens the more Russia will push. With the European Union effectively hamstrung the United States becomes the only nation economically and militarily capable of leading a defense. Will we respond and risk escalating the conflict?

The answer appears to be yes...

This month the U.S. Army announced it’s own “exercise”. Operation Atlantic Resolve, which launched last April after the Crimea annexation, is now being extended and expanded. U.S. troops have landed in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. The expansion will land additional U.S. troops in Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, and possibly Georgia. The decision has also been made to land U.S. troops in Ukraine. On March 5th the 173rd Airborne Brigade deployed 1 battalion to L’viv in Western Ukraine. From there they’ll train the Ukrainians to better fight the Russians.

The countries the U.S. has deployed in is very telling to what’s going on. It’s a line in the sand. NATO on one side and Russia on the other. Colonel Michael Foster of the 173rd said this regarding U.S. troop deployments:

"So by the end of the summer, you could very well see an operation that stretches from the Baltics all the way down to the Black Sea. As you connect countries, there is almost a line of US troops."

Almost completely under the radar NATO has drawn a red line down Eastern Europe from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea. Directly in the face of Russia.

While Europe degrades in the shadow of Russian fascism hell bent on the pursuit of an ethnic empire, another conflict is evolving across the Black Sea.

...Islamic fascism

EXCLUSIVE: Tech Ethicist reveals 5 ways to control AI NOW

MANAURE QUINTERO / Contributor | Getty Images

By now, many of us are familiar with AI and its potential benefits and threats. However, unless you're a tech tycoon, it can feel like you have little influence over the future of artificial intelligence.

For years, Glenn has warned about the dangers of rapidly developing AI technologies that have taken the world by storm.

He acknowledges their significant benefits but emphasizes the need to establish proper boundaries and ethics now, while we still have control. But since most people aren’t Silicon Valley tech leaders making the decisions, how can they help keep AI in check?

Recently, Glenn interviewed Tristan Harris, a tech ethicist deeply concerned about the potential harm of unchecked AI, to discuss its societal implications. Harris highlighted a concerning new piece of legislation proposed by Texas Senator Ted Cruz. This legislation proposes a state-level moratorium on AI regulation, meaning only the federal government could regulate AI. Harris noted that there’s currently no Federal plan for regulating AI. Until the federal government establishes a plan, tech companies would have nearly free rein with their AI. And we all know how slowly the federal government moves.

This is where you come in. Tristan Harris shared with Glenn the top five actions you should urge your representatives to take regarding AI, including opposing the moratorium until a concrete plan is in place. Now is your chance to influence the future of AI. Contact your senator and congressman today and share these five crucial steps they must take to keep AI in check:

Ban engagement-optimized AI companions for kids

Create legislation that will prevent AI from being designed to maximize addiction, sexualization, flattery, and attachment disorders, and to protect young people’s mental health and ability to form real-life friendships.

Establish basic liability laws

Companies need to be held accountable when their products cause real-world harm.

Pass increased whistleblower protections

Protect concerned technologists working inside the AI labs from facing untenable pressures and threats that prevent them from warning the public when the AI rollout is unsafe or crosses dangerous red lines.

Prevent AI from having legal rights

Enact laws so AIs don’t have protected speech or have their own bank accounts, making sure our legal system works for human interests over AI interests.

Oppose the state moratorium on AI 

Call your congressman or Senator Cruz’s office, and demand they oppose the state moratorium on AI without a plan for how we will set guardrails for this technology.

Glenn: Only Trump dared to deliver on decades of empty promises

Tasos Katopodis / Stringer | Getty Images

The Islamic regime has been killing Americans since 1979. Now Trump’s response proves we’re no longer playing defense — we’re finally hitting back.

The United States has taken direct military action against Iran’s nuclear program. Whatever you think of the strike, it’s over. It’s happened. And now, we have to predict what happens next. I want to help you understand the gravity of this situation: what happened, what it means, and what might come next. To that end, we need to begin with a little history.

Since 1979, Iran has been at war with us — even if we refused to call it that.

We are either on the verge of a remarkable strategic victory or a devastating global escalation. Time will tell.

It began with the hostage crisis, when 66 Americans were seized and 52 were held for over a year by the radical Islamic regime. Four years later, 17 more Americans were murdered in the U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut, followed by 241 Marines in the Beirut barracks bombing.

Then came the Khobar Towers bombing in 1996, which killed 19 more U.S. airmen. Iran had its fingerprints all over it.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, Iranian-backed proxies killed hundreds of American soldiers. From 2001 to 2020 in Afghanistan and 2003 to 2011 in Iraq, Iran supplied IEDs and tactical support.

The Iranians have plotted assassinations and kidnappings on U.S. soil — in 2011, 2021, and again in 2024 — and yet we’ve never really responded.

The precedent for U.S. retaliation has always been present, but no president has chosen to pull the trigger until this past weekend. President Donald Trump struck decisively. And what our military pulled off this weekend was nothing short of extraordinary.

Operation Midnight Hammer

The strike was reportedly called Operation Midnight Hammer. It involved as many as 175 U.S. aircraft, including 12 B-2 stealth bombers — out of just 19 in our entire arsenal. Those bombers are among the most complex machines in the world, and they were kept mission-ready by some of the finest mechanics on the planet.

USAF / Handout | Getty Images

To throw off Iranian radar and intelligence, some bombers flew west toward Guam — classic misdirection. The rest flew east, toward the real targets.

As the B-2s approached Iranian airspace, U.S. submarines launched dozens of Tomahawk missiles at Iran’s fortified nuclear facilities. Minutes later, the bombers dropped 14 MOPs — massive ordnance penetrators — each designed to drill deep into the earth and destroy underground bunkers. These bombs are the size of an F-16 and cost millions of dollars apiece. They are so accurate, I’ve been told they can hit the top of a soda can from 15,000 feet.

They were built for this mission — and we’ve been rehearsing this run for 15 years.

If the satellite imagery is accurate — and if what my sources tell me is true — the targeted nuclear sites were utterly destroyed. We’ll likely rely on the Israelis to confirm that on the ground.

This was a master class in strategy, execution, and deterrence. And it proved that only the United States could carry out a strike like this. I am very proud of our military, what we are capable of doing, and what we can accomplish.

What comes next

We don’t yet know how Iran will respond, but many of the possibilities are troubling. The Iranians could target U.S. forces across the Middle East. On Monday, Tehran launched 20 missiles at U.S. bases in Qatar, Syria, and Kuwait, to no effect. God forbid, they could also unleash Hezbollah or other terrorist proxies to strike here at home — and they just might.

Iran has also threatened to shut down the Strait of Hormuz — the artery through which nearly a fifth of the world’s oil flows. On Sunday, Iran’s parliament voted to begin the process. If the Supreme Council and the ayatollah give the go-ahead, we could see oil prices spike to $150 or even $200 a barrel.

That would be catastrophic.

The 2008 financial collapse was pushed over the edge when oil hit $130. Western economies — including ours — simply cannot sustain oil above $120 for long. If this conflict escalates and the Strait is closed, the global economy could unravel.

The strike also raises questions about regime stability. Will it spark an uprising, or will the Islamic regime respond with a brutal crackdown on dissidents?

Early signs aren’t hopeful. Reports suggest hundreds of arrests over the weekend and at least one dissident executed on charges of spying for Israel. The regime’s infamous morality police, the Gasht-e Ershad, are back on the streets. Every phone, every vehicle — monitored. The U.S. embassy in Qatar issued a shelter-in-place warning for Americans.

Russia and China both condemned the strike. On Monday, a senior Iranian official flew to Moscow to meet with Vladimir Putin. That meeting should alarm anyone paying attention. Their alliance continues to deepen — and that’s a serious concern.

Now we pray

We are either on the verge of a remarkable strategic victory or a devastating global escalation. Time will tell. But either way, President Trump didn’t start this. He inherited it — and he took decisive action.

The difference is, he did what they all said they would do. He didn’t send pallets of cash in the dead of night. He didn’t sign another failed treaty.

He acted. Now, we pray. For peace, for wisdom, and for the strength to meet whatever comes next.


This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Globalize the Intifada? Why Mamdani’s plan spells DOOM for America

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

If New Yorkers hand City Hall to Zohran Mamdani, they’re not voting for change. They’re opening the door to an alliance of socialism, Islamism, and chaos.

It only took 25 years for New York City to go from the resilient, flag-waving pride following the 9/11 attacks to a political fever dream. To quote Michael Malice, “I'm old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it.”

Malice is talking about Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist assemblyman from Queens now eyeing the mayor’s office. Mamdani, a 33-year-old state representative emerging from relative political obscurity, is now receiving substantial funding for his mayoral campaign from the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

CAIR has a long and concerning history, including being born out of the Muslim Brotherhood and named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding case. Why would the group have dropped $100,000 into a PAC backing Mamdani’s campaign?

Mamdani blends political Islam with Marxist economics — two ideologies that have left tens of millions dead in the 20th century alone.

Perhaps CAIR has a vested interest in Mamdani’s call to “globalize the intifada.” That’s not a call for peaceful protest. Intifada refers to historic uprisings of Muslims against what they call the “Israeli occupation of Palestine.” Suicide bombings and street violence are part of the playbook. So when Mamdani says he wants to “globalize” that, who exactly is the enemy in this global scenario? Because it sure sounds like he's saying America is the new Israel, and anyone who supports Western democracy is the new Zionist.

Mamdani tried to clean up his language by citing the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, which once used “intifada” in an Arabic-language article to describe the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. So now he’s comparing Palestinians to Jewish victims of the Nazis? If that doesn’t twist your stomach into knots, you’re not paying attention.

If you’re “globalizing” an intifada, and positioning Israel — and now America — as the Nazis, that’s not a cry for human rights. That’s a call for chaos and violence.

Rising Islamism

But hey, this is New York. Faculty members at Columbia University — where Mamdani’s own father once worked — signed a letter defending students who supported Hamas after October 7. They also contributed to Mamdani’s mayoral campaign. And his father? He blamed Ronald Reagan and the religious right for inspiring Islamic terrorism, as if the roots of 9/11 grew in Washington, not the caves of Tora Bora.

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

This isn’t about Islam as a faith. We should distinguish between Islam and Islamism. Islam is a religion followed peacefully by millions. Islamism is something entirely different — an ideology that seeks to merge mosque and state, impose Sharia law, and destroy secular liberal democracies from within. Islamism isn’t about prayer and fasting. It’s about power.

Criticizing Islamism is not Islamophobia. It is not an attack on peaceful Muslims. In fact, Muslims are often its first victims.

Islamism is misogynistic, theocratic, violent, and supremacist. It’s hostile to free speech, religious pluralism, gay rights, secularism — even to moderate Muslims. Yet somehow, the progressive left — the same left that claims to fight for feminism, LGBTQ rights, and free expression — finds itself defending candidates like Mamdani. You can’t make this stuff up.

Blending the worst ideologies

And if that weren’t enough, Mamdani also identifies as a Democratic Socialist. He blends political Islam with Marxist economics — two ideologies that have left tens of millions dead in the 20th century alone. But don’t worry, New York. I’m sure this time socialism will totally work. Just like it always didn’t.

If you’re a business owner, a parent, a person who’s saved anything, or just someone who values sanity: Get out. I’m serious. If Mamdani becomes mayor, as seems likely, then New York City will become a case study in what happens when you marry ideological extremism with political power. And it won’t be pretty.

This is about more than one mayoral race. It’s about the future of Western liberalism. It’s about drawing a bright line between faith and fanaticism, between healthy pluralism and authoritarian dogma.

Call out radicalism

We must call out political Islam the same way we call out white nationalism or any other supremacist ideology. When someone chants “globalize the intifada,” that should send a chill down your spine — whether you’re Jewish, Christian, Muslim, atheist, or anything in between.

The left may try to shame you into silence with words like “Islamophobia,” but the record is worn out. The grooves are shallow. The American people see what’s happening. And we’re not buying it.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Could China OWN our National Parks?

Jonathan Newton / Contributor | Getty Images

The left’s idea of stewardship involves bulldozing bison and barring access. Lee’s vision puts conservation back in the hands of the people.

The media wants you to believe that Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is trying to bulldoze Yellowstone and turn national parks into strip malls — that he’s calling for a reckless fire sale of America’s natural beauty to line developers’ pockets. That narrative is dishonest. It’s fearmongering, and, by the way, it’s wrong.

Here’s what’s really happening.

Private stewardship works. It’s local. It’s accountable. It’s incentivized.

The federal government currently owns 640 million acres of land — nearly 28% of all land in the United States. To put that into perspective, that’s more territory than France, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom combined.

Most of this land is west of the Mississippi River. That’s not a coincidence. In the American West, federal ownership isn’t just a bureaucratic technicality — it’s a stranglehold. States are suffocated. Locals are treated as tenants. Opportunities are choked off.

Meanwhile, people living east of the Mississippi — in places like Kentucky, Georgia, or Pennsylvania — might not even realize how little land their own states truly control. But the same policies that are plaguing the West could come for them next.

Lee isn’t proposing to auction off Yellowstone or pave over Yosemite. He’s talking about 3 million acres — that’s less than half of 1% of the federal estate. And this land isn’t your family’s favorite hiking trail. It’s remote, hard to access, and often mismanaged.

Failed management

Why was it mismanaged in the first place? Because the federal government is a terrible landlord.

Consider Yellowstone again. It’s home to the last remaining herd of genetically pure American bison — animals that haven’t been crossbred with cattle. Ranchers, myself included, would love the chance to help restore these majestic creatures on private land. But the federal government won’t allow it.

So what do they do when the herd gets too big?

They kill them. Bulldoze them into mass graves. That’s not conservation. That’s bureaucratic malpractice.

And don’t even get me started on bald eagles — majestic symbols of American freedom and a federally protected endangered species, now regularly slaughtered by wind turbines. I have pictures of piles of dead bald eagles. Where’s the outrage?

Biden’s federal land-grab

Some argue that states can’t afford to manage this land themselves. But if the states can’t afford it, how can Washington? We’re $35 trillion in debt. Entitlements are strained, infrastructure is crumbling, and the Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, and National Park Service are billions of dollars behind in basic maintenance. Roads, firebreaks, and trails are falling apart.

The Biden administration quietly embraced something called the “30 by 30” initiative, a plan to lock up 30% of all U.S. land and water under federal “conservation” by 2030. The real goal is 50% by 2050.

That entails half of the country being taken away from you, controlled not by the people who live there but by technocrats in D.C.

You think that won’t affect your ability to hunt, fish, graze cattle, or cut timber? Think again. It won’t be conservatives who stop you from building a cabin, raising cattle, or teaching your grandkids how to shoot a rifle. It’ll be the same radical environmentalists who treat land as sacred — unless it’s your truck, your deer stand, or your back yard.

Land as collateral

Moreover, the U.S. Treasury is considering putting federally owned land on the national balance sheet, listing your parks, forests, and hunting grounds as collateral.

What happens if America defaults on its debt?

David McNew / Stringer | Getty Images

Do you think our creditors won’t come calling? Imagine explaining to your kids that the lake you used to fish in is now under foreign ownership, that the forest you hunted in belongs to China.

This is not hypothetical. This is the logical conclusion of treating land like a piggy bank.

The American way

There’s a better way — and it’s the American way.

Let the people who live near the land steward it. Let ranchers, farmers, sportsmen, and local conservationists do what they’ve done for generations.

Did you know that 75% of America’s wetlands are on private land? Or that the most successful wildlife recoveries — whitetail deer, ducks, wild turkeys — didn’t come from Washington but from partnerships between private landowners and groups like Ducks Unlimited?

Private stewardship works. It’s local. It’s accountable. It’s incentivized. When you break it, you fix it. When you profit from the land, you protect it.

This is not about selling out. It’s about buying in — to freedom, to responsibility, to the principle of constitutional self-governance.

So when you hear the pundits cry foul over 3 million acres of federal land, remember: We don’t need Washington to protect our land. We need Washington to get out of the way.

Because this isn’t just about land. It’s about liberty. And once liberty is lost, it doesn’t come back easily.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.