Insane: Obama calls climate change the "serious threat" facing America

While speaking at the Coast Guard Academy commencement ceremony, President Obama finally called out a threat to America and the world. No no, it wasn’t the Islamic State. Or Russia, or China, or Al-Qaeda. He decided to call out the problem of climate change. Is there any doubt this administration is completely detached from reality?

Below is a transcript of this segment:

Let's talk about what Obama has in store for us. Just for a moment. He's the commander-in-chief. A lot going on in the world. We have enemies. We have threats. We have problems. That's an understatement. We have big problems.

But we have a commander-in-chief who understands that there are problems. He will make sure that he tackles the issues that are really important. And he thinks about things. And he's going to tell us what the scariest thing for us is to avoid. You know what it is? Climate change, my friends. Number one national security threat facing the United States according to President Obama. Play what he had to say at the Coast Guard Academy


OBAMA: This is not just a problem for countries on the coast or for certain regions of the world. Climate change will impact every country on the planet. No nation is immune. I'm here today to say that climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security. An immediate risk to our national security. And make no mistake, it will impact how our military defends our country. And so we need to act. And we need to act now.

BUCK: That's insane. I don't know how better to put it than that. That's completely disconnected from reality. First of all, even the climate change screaming, wailing banshees out there. Even the ones who are just freaking about this all the time. Oh, climate change. We're all going to die. Have you seen a run on rubber boats, or what do they call it? A rubber dingy. A thing from a boat. Have you seen that recently? Is everyone buying up canoes in preparation for the melting glaciers? This is ridiculous. Right?

At best, they say, well, in 100 years, the sea level will rise six inches or something, and there will be a one-degree Celsius rise -- or .1-degree rise in global temperature or something like that. But it's in 50 years, 100 years. You know, it's a projection so far out, that it's impossible to disprove. Right?

You're like, I don't know what will happen in 100 years. They think they know. They can't predict the weather accurately a couple days in advance. But they can tell you what climate is going to be in 100 years. Sure. Sure, they can. Even more amazing than that. The president, despite all the stuff that's going on, despite China building islands in the middle of the South China Sea, that it can use as military and naval bases, despite Russia engaging in very bellicose and aggressive behavior against its neighbors, despite the growth of the Islamic State, the continued existence of al-Qaeda and the various other jihadist entities around the world sworn to destroy us and Israel and civilization with it, despite all of that, climate change.

Woo, scary. Spooky climate change. I don't know what to say to these people anymore. You see, they think that I'm crazy because I don't stay up at night worrying about this because I think they're a bunch of -- the scientists they rely on are largely a bunch of frauds. Many of them aren't even scientists. They just play one on TV. They're activists. I read a few science books and I know science stuff. E equals MC squared. Boom, #science. It doesn't really work that way. That's not how it goes. Scientists. Real scientists, well, first of all, they would never say stuff like the science is settled, or the consensus means that there can be no dissent or dispute because science is of course premised upon the continuous testing and retesting of hypotheses and results that can be replicated once you have the data.

Hmm. But they don't do that. They can't do that. So we have President Obama saying, everybody, you're going to be really scared. Your house will be on the water. I know you might like swimming. But this water will be very dirty. It's a big threat. Because you'll have to swim all over the place. It's tiring. Maybe you just ate lunch. You're going to get a cramp. So you don't want climate change. It's the biggest national security threat we face.

Is it really? That's the best that he -- that's the biggest one. This is the one that keeps the commander-in-chief up at night. This is the one that terrifies him. Climate change. I don't know what to say. They don't want to discuss it. They want to call people deniers. And they want to say the science is settled, when this is crazy. No one even holds these positions publicly. But, again, climate change is a religious belief for people who think they're too smart for religion.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:

WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.