Words do matter

Below is a transcript of this segment:

Hello, America. Welcome to The Glenn Beck Program and TheBlaze, the network you are building. I’m Brad Thor, filling in for Glenn tonight. You know, July is one of my favorite months, and we celebrated the birth of the United States. Two hundred thirty-nine years ago, Americans risked everything in defiance of tyranny. King George was defeated, and the Constitution guaranteed that this new nation would never have to suffer under tyranny ever again. Or did it?

Progressives have launched an all-out assault on this nation’s very foundation, and the scary part is that progressivism and the Constitution are like oil and water; they don’t mix. But is it even possible for progressives to win that fight? I mean, they can’t rewrite the Constitution, can they? Well, no, but there’s more than one way to skin a cat. They’ve chosen a clever path, wordplay and bullying. Here’s how it works.

Progressives lay out an unconstitutional idea. Let’s take amnesty, for example. They give it a flowery name, “Dreamers.” Now, the trap is set. Anyone who disagrees is publicly chastised, mocked, ridiculed as a paranoid racist who wants to crush the dreams of poor minority immigrants. There’s a name for this strategy. George Orwell coined it decades ago. He called it “Newspeak.” Anyone who had a thought contrary to the totalitarian state was deemed a thought criminal, and being a thought criminal was considered the worst crime you could commit.

Truly free societies value all opinions, even the most controversial, and truly free societies value truth. America was built on truth. The new progressive foundation though is built on lies. Look at the Supreme Court ruling last month. They basically said states couldn’t deny gay marriages anymore. I’ve read the Constitution and can’t find marriage anywhere, but somehow five lawyers in the highest court of the land found a way to make the Constitution say whatever they wanted it to say.

In 2012, Chief Justice Roberts literally rewrote the ObamaCare law by calling the penalty a tax. Now, some advocates for the law were against calling it a tax, but Roberts knew better, didn’t he? You see, calling it a penalty wasn’t in the Newspeak dictionary, but changing it to tax made the law constitutional. It makes you wonder if the Supreme Court will eventually change its own name to the Ministry of Truth with Justice Roberts sitting at Winston Smith’s vacated desk striking through words that no longer mean what Big Brother wishes them to mean.

Progressives are using Orwellian theory to fundamentally transform—I wonder who said that—our country, but today, rather than calling it Newspeak, we call it something else. We call it political correctness, and it will be the death of this nation. You see, political correctness is the vehicle that’s now used to chastise, label, and bludgeon the population into conformity.

Six months ago, Atlanta fire chief Kelvin Cochran was fired for publishing a book that addressed issues of sexuality. He published the book, are you ready for this, for a church. This was a 34-year veteran of the fire department, but his actions didn’t conform to Newspeak, so he was punished for his crime against the progressive state.

Religious freedom is a founding principle, but progressives don’t have this term in their list of approved words and phrases. The owners of Memories Pizza in Walkerton, Indiana found this out the hard way. They were sought out, isolated, and viciously smeared merely for answering a hypothetical question about wedding pizza. There were forced to temporarily close their doors, simply for having a different opinion. My God, a local high school coach even threatened to burn the shop to the ground.

This is now the price of nonconformity in America, and nobody knows that better than the Tea Party, who was labeled a nonconformist too. This time, public chastisement wasn’t enough, so when the government unleashed the IRS on the Tea Party, that should’ve been a wake-up call for all of us, because if the government is capable of using its institutions as weapons against certain political viewpoints, just think what they’ll do with ObamaCare. How much power, how much leverage do they have over the country now that they have access to your medical records and to mine?

Forget the power of the IRS, this has the capability to be 1000 times worse, and it makes you wonder why the Ministry of—I’m sorry, I mean the Supreme Court, was so eager to rewrite the law to make it legal. You see, morality is getting phased out in this nation. In the vacuum left behind, there’s a new ethos emerging. Don’t believe in same-sex marriage? You’re a homophobe. You don’t agree with banning the Confederate flag? You, my friend, are a racist. How about not believing in the redistribution of wealth? You obviously hate poor people. How about amnesty, do you believe in that? No? Well, you obviously hate Mexicans. How about man-made global warming? Of course not. That makes you a science denier. But you believe in God, and that makes you an extremist zealot.

I’m an author, and we all trade in words, and we know that words matter. We can’t even say radical Islam anymore. They’re erasing it from all the State Department manuals. Fort Hood, in fact, was labeled workplace violence, even though Nidal Hasan made clear he was waging jihad, shouting “Allahu Akbar” during the shooting. But calling him an Islamic terrorist wasn’t politically correct. Muslims complained. Progressives lashed out at conservatives for bigotry.

Four years later from death row, Hasan penned a letter to ISIS head Baghdadi asking to be allowed to join. His attorney even said he wasn’t at all surprised by that letter: “It’s consistent with his position all along. Religious fervor underscores much of his life—his actions, his thought process. He really didn’t get into much of that during the trial because it was prohibited.” It was prohibited? At a trial? Why? Well, the answer is that it doesn’t fit the party line. It’s a viewpoint in opposition with Big Brother and state propaganda.

This act of terrorism was changed to mean something entirely different, and changing the meaning of words has consequences. Progressives have unleashed a war on thought, and since speech governs thought, political correctness is being used to change the way we speak and even the meaning of our words. Justice Scalia was right when he incredulously said, “Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange [meaning a healthcare exchange] that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.’”

Words do matter. They have meaning. Twisting them, changing them, and limiting them is a dangerous precedent. As George Orwell said in 1985, “if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”

Glenn has focused on exposing the dark side of the gender movements waging our culture war, and now, there's a new "trend" emerging as an offshoot to the transgender movement. A growing online community, particularly of men, who consider themselves "involuntarily celibate" or "incels" believe they can live a better life as a trans woman. Why? This community purports the world is rigged against men, particularly against traditionally "unattractive men." What's the solution? Stop being a man...

Incel or "involutarily celibate" communities have existed online in the dark corners of Reddit and Discord for years. The groups are marked by a hatred towards women, blaming them for rigging the world in their favor and denying them of sex. Several members of this growing community have been responsible for large acts of violence, most notably Alek Minassian, who killed 10 and injured 16 after driving a van into a busy area of Toronto in 2021.

However, the transgender movement has presented a new option for incel members: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... or, in the Transmaxxers' case, "become them."

The online Transmaxxer's Manifesto says, “Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.” According to the manifesto, transitioning to female not only opens up a different pool of sexual partners, but moreover, you gain access to female-only spaces and are “able to extract resources from males.”

“Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.”

Another member wrote, "If you do not currently feel like living as a female you might have to work on fixing that ... Identifying as male or being emotionally attached to a male body is bad for you if being male results in you living a bad life.”

This new movement is significant because it is in stark contrast to the mainstream narrative that "transgenderism" is an innate quality. Now, it can be an "option" people choose for social advantage. A moderator going by the alias “Vintologi” on the Transmaxxing Discord server, which boasts over 1,200 members, told The Daily Caller:

Transmaxxing is about transitioning for personal gain rather than focusing on things like "gender identity." ... What matters when it comes to medical transition is whether or not said transition would actually be beneficial, thus the extent to which gender identity is innate does not inform us much regarding when medical transition is appropriate.

One incel member on Reddit lamented that he can't Transmaxx to "have sex with white trans women" and to have "all the benefits of [being] female."

Transmaxxing sheds light on a concerning issue as an increasing number of people, particularly the youth, identify as "transgender." What used to be considered as a "finge case" is now being seen as a social advantage. Glenn recently sat down with de-transitioner Chloe Cole, and the amount of pressure she experienced to become a transgender man AS A TEENAGER was ASTOUNDING. She discussed the new community, friendships, and affirmation she gained when she started her transition journey, and she lost ALL of those social perks when she began de-transitioning. She exchanged affirmation for death-threats, friendships for stone-cold silence.

Transmaxxing is a very specific example of a larger movement that is deeply concerning. Not only is the thansgender ideology problematic on its own merits, but now, we are seeing a rise of a distinction of "social advantage" based on gender affiliation. This is deviating away from the original notion that transgenderism is an innate quality. Now, many consider it more "socially advantageous" to identify as transgender than with your biological gender.

At the same time President Biden's misplaced classified documents were sitting in his house, garage, and office at the Penn Biden Center, a whole lot of Chinese money was flowing around him. Is this just a coincidence, or did the Chinese get anything in return? Investigative journalist John Solomon joins to break down what was going on here ...

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Here are 5 RIDICULOUS moments from the Davos summit

Dimitrios Kambouris / Staff, FABRICE COFFRINI / Contributor, JOSEPH EID / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn has been warning about the dangers of the World Economic Forum and The Great Reset, which is the WEF's goal to utilize the crises like the COVID pandemic to create a leftist Utopia. Now, these goals continue to take shape at the World Economic Forum summit in Davos. Here are five ridiculous moments from this year's summit that shed light on their ultimate vision Glenn has been warning about.

1. Ex-CNN host Brian Stelter hosts the WEF panel on "disinformation," calling for the criminalization of "hate speech" in the U.S.

The former host of Reliable Sources was fired from CNN in 2022 for raking in the network's worst ratings since 2019. CNN's CEO at the time, Chris Licht, accused Stelter of "drawing ire from conservatives" for misrepresenting the facts and propagating false narratives to demonize conservatives. Licht fired Stelter because he was a liability to CNN's attempt to "re-brand" itself as a "reliable" news source.

You would think the World Economic Forum could have found a more credible host for its "disinformation," than Brian Stelter, and it comes with little surprise Stelter's panel called for the continued censorship of conservatives.

Stelter asked his panel, "How does this discussion of disinformation relate to everything else happening today in Davos?"

Vice-President of the European Commission Vera Jourová answered "illegal hate speech" from right-wing extremists, and then called for the criminalization of hate speech in the U.S., asserting, "I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law" within the EU.

As former Trump advisor Stephen Miller pointed out, Stelter's refusal to further challenge Jourová's call for censorship is indicative of his failed career as a journalist.

2. Al Gore warns of "rain bombs," "boiling oceans," and "xenophobia" as a result of climate change.

Gore's speech "speaks" for itself...

After asserting that we're creating an "open sewer" in the troposphere, Gore exclaimed:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs, and sucking the moisture out of the land, and creating the droughts, and melting the ice and raising the sea level, and causing these waves of climate refugees!
Watch the latest video at <a href="https://www.foxnews.com">foxnews.com</a>

Speaking of refugees, Gore blamed the mass migrations of people on... you guessed it... climate change! Of course this leads to "xenophobia" and "fascism," so if we hate "xenophobia" and "fascism," we need to stop climate change IMMEDIATELY. Plus the rain bombs...

Does this sound reminiscent of the "Man-Bear-Pig?"

Courtesy of South Park

3. Siemens AG Chairman Jim Hagemann urges for 1 million people to NOT eat meat—predicting a "meatless future."

It wouldn't be a World Economic Forum summit if bugs didn't take center stage. Siemens AG Chairman Jim Hagemann said he was inspired by his 24-year-old daughter to stop eating meat to fight climate change and urged one million people to stop eating meat to balance out jet emissions—like the jets his fellow attendees used to travel to the conference?

Here's what he said:

If a billion people stop eating meat, I tell you, it has a big impact. Not only does it have a big impact on the current food system, but it will also inspire innovation of food systems."
Watch the latest video at <a href="https://www.foxnews.com">foxnews.com</a>

Of course, finding "alternative sources of protein" means... you guessed it... BUGS. The EU is already cutting down on cattle farms and promoting the building of insect farms to initiate this "protein transition."

4. John Kerry calls Davos attendees a "select group" with an "almost extraterrestrial" plan to save the planet.

Kerry's opening speech at Davos shows the type of elitism the attendees believe about themselves. They are the "special ones" who can gather at a Swiss resort town to discuss how to "save the planet" and the "little people" who are too ignorant to have a say in the matter. His words speak for themselves:

When you start to think about it, it's pretty extraordinary that we — select group of human beings because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives — are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet [...] I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet [...] f you say that to most people, most people think you're just a crazy, tree-hugging, lefty liberal, you know, do-gooder, or whatever, and there's no relationship. But really, that's where we are.
Watch the latest video at <a href="https://www.foxnews.com">foxnews.com</a>

Well, not everyone was amused...

Businessman and conservative Tim Acheson called Kerry’s words, "Liberal delusions of grandeur." Jordan Peterson also tweeted, "Who are you going to sacrifice to save the planet, @JohnKerry -- and do you think and how will you ensure that they have any say in the matter?"

5. Davos attendees traveled on more than 1,000 private jets to the conference.

Greenspace, an environmentalist research group, estimates the total emissions used by Davos attendees on their private jets while traveling to the conference is equivalent to "about 350,000 average cars."

Greenspace also found that 53 percent of all private jet trips were short-haul flights of less than 470 nautical miles that "could have easily been train trips." This comes amid the EU's push to ban short-distance flights and opt for train travel instead, which many continue to point out.

Closing thoughts

What once sounded like conspiracy theories are now taking shape amongst the global elites at Davos. As Glenn continues to shed light on the dangers of the World Economic Forum, here's how YOU can fight back against their goals that threaten our freedoms and democracy.

In honor of the World Economic Forum summit in Davos, we would like to resurrect this gem from Glenn's Instagram archive. If "the Great Reset" doesn't work out, Schwab should consider reaching out to the Bond franchise for a Plan-B career.

Be sure to follow Glenn on Instagram for more!

This is part of our ongoing series on "The Great Reset." To read similar content, click here.