Appalling audio from Louis Farrakhan nearly causes Glenn to blow out vocal cords (again)

Just two days after a month long hiatus resting his voice, Glenn couldn't help but scream into the microphone on radio Wednesday. Weeks of whispering would make anyone want to holler given the chance, so it's not too surprising - especially after the appalling sound clip Glenn played just before launching into his boisterous tirade.

In a story that's being ignored by the mainstream media, Nation of Islam head Louis Farrakhan delivered a speech last week in which he called for "10,000 fearless men" to "rise up and kill those who kill us."

"How is this guy walking around still today? Seriously, I want to know. How is he -- where is the media! When you took us on day after day after day after day saying we were inciting violence. Where the hell are you? He's calling for the execution of Americans." Glenn said vehemently.

It didn't take Glenn long to realize he may have pushed his voice a little too hard.

"I should not talk for the rest of the day. I blew out my vocal cords," Glenn said.

But he wasn't finished yet.

"I just can't take the hypocrisy. You're all about the fricking lion in Zimbabwe, and you don't care about the abortion mills. I can't take it anymore," Glenn said.

Glenn also reminded listeners his newest book, It IS About Islam, will come out out on August 18th.

"It is not a book that is full of hyperbole or opinion. It is the exact words from the terrorists themselves. And from terrorist organizations. It is also the exact words from major universities in the Middle East on what Sharia law says and what you must do," Glenn said.

Watch the full segment in the video below.

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it may contain errors.

GLENN: I'm putting out a new book, it comes out August 18th. It is very well researched. It is not a book that is full of hyperbole or opinion. It is the exact words from the terrorists themselves. And from terrorist organizations.

It is also the exact words from major universities in the Middle East on what Sharia law says and what you must do.

The name of the book is It Is About Islam. I don't care how many people say, oh, this is not about Islam. That has nothing -- it is about Islam. And I don't know if you sensed a change in me in the last few months and maybe even in the last few days. But I don't care anymore. And when I say that, I mean, I've always tried to balance things to make sure that we have the maximum audience and the maximum reach. I think we're out of time.

And I don't know what the world is going to be like in six months, 12 months, 18 months, three years, five years. I have no idea.

I'm going to say what I have to say, and I'm going to say it now. It is about Islam, no matter what anybody tells you. And all of the facts are coming out on August 18th. Now, that phrase came to me yesterday or day before when I saw an incredible speech given by Louis Farrakhan from the Nation of Islam.

LOUIS: So if the federal government will not intercede in our affairs, then we must rise up and kill those who kill us. Stop them and kill them and let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling!

GLENN: How is this guy walking around still today? Seriously, I want to know. How is he -- where is the media! When you took us on day after day after day after day saying we were inciting violence. Where the hell are you? He's calling for the execution of Americans. Where are you? You are nowhere. Why? Because it is about Islam. And you are too much of a wuss to say the truth! You cower in fear. You're going to get us all killed.

PAT: He actually says the Koran demands it. The Koran calls for it.

GLENN: It does.

PAT: And he calls for out of the million people following him or the million man march or whatever, he needs 10,000 warriors who are not afraid to kill white people.

GLENN: To kill and be killed.

Yes.

PAT: It's not an unbelievable, I guess, sermon that he was preaching, and nobody is talking about it. Nobody.

Do you remember when Sarah Palin said that they were targeting the district for a political campaign and that was hateful, violent speech?

GLENN: Do you remember how I had to up my security because the media was saying that I was threatening people and that I was calling for violence and how much violence was inflicted on us and threatened on us and our family?

PAT: Absolutely.

GLENN: Because the media wanted to stop violence. Nothing on Louis Farrakhan. Nothing.

He is calling, not couching it, he is openly calling for the slaughter of Americans.

PAT: Is that not inciting violence?

GLENN: Yes, sir, it is.

PAT: Is that not the very definition? I don't know. I don't know how you get around it.

GLENN: I should not talk for the rest of the day. I blew out my vocal cords.

PAT: I was just going to say.

STU: You usually don't scream like that normally, especially the second day back.

GLENN: But I just can't take it.

PAT: I know it's hard.

GLENN: I just can't take the hypocrisy. You're all about the fricking lion in Zimbabwe, and you don't care about the abortion mills. I can't take it anymore.

PAT: Or somebody calling for 10,000 blacks to kill whites. Well, what are you talking about?

GLENN: I can't take it. I can't take it. I can't take it. I am not sitting down anymore.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I'm just not. I'm not. I'm not going to sit down anymore.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.