Young woman shows up at Ferguson protest to deliver powerful statement

As tensions flared in Ferguson following the one-year anniversary of Michael Brown’s death, a 19 year old college student decided to join the protest for a very unexpected reason. Glenn interviewed Lexi Kozhevsky on radio Tuesday to find out why she did what he called "one of the bravest things I've seen anyone do."

In an act she described as "unnerving, to say the least," Kozhevsky ventured to the streets of Ferguson to support local law enforcement, placing herself between the protesters and a line a police officers.

She shared a Snapchat video with TheBlaze, which captured the moment.

The nursing student told Glenn why she felt it was simply the right thing to do.

"I think our police are getting the brunt end of a lot of negativity, and my thing is not all cops are bad. So I felt the need to show them that someone else is there for them and protect them," Kozhevsky said.

Watch the full exchange or read the transcript below.

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it may contain errors.

GLENN: Last night, there was a young woman who did exactly that. In one of the bravest things I've seen anyone do. This Washington University student goes out apparently by herself and stands between the protesters and the police in Ferguson. Here's what she said last night, as she is standing alone with the police about 20 feet behind her. As she is standing there all by herself, she says this. Pat doesn't have it. I stalled as long as I could.

PAT: You did. You gave a shot.

GLENN: I did. That's all right.

So last night she stood there and she said, I'd rather have something happen to me than my police. Why would she do that?

Lexi is on the phone with us.

Lexi, how do you say your last name?

LEXI: Kozhevsky. And I go to St. Louis University, just so you guys now.

GLENN: Okay. Sorry. We have the wrong information.

But, Lexi, it's great to have you on the phone. Why did you do that last night?

LEXI: I was just doing what felt right, honestly. I think our police are getting the brunt end of a lot of negativity, and my thing is not all cops are bad. So I felt the need to show them that someone else is there for them and protect them.

PAT: Are your parents around? Do you --

LEXI: You mean like currently?

GLENN: Yeah, are they alive?

LEXI: Oh, yeah. But I live with my grandparents.

PAT: And how did they feel about this?

LEXI: They're nervous more than anything.

PAT: I'll bet, yeah.

LEXI: Yes.

GLENN: How many people did you go with last night?

LEXI: I went with two of my friends.

GLENN: And how did this come about? You're just sitting around doing what when somebody said what that made you get into the car?

LEXI: Well, pretty much, I was having a pretty rough day. And I was like -- I was going through my home, scrolling through articles. And I was like, a state of emergency, and it's really close. I was like, guys, we should go see this. This is history, like, right in front of us. And then I didn't plan on doing that, it just sort of happened.

GLENN: What made you -- what made you stand in between them when you were there?

LEXI: Because -- well, the thing is, they -- things are being thrown at them the previous night. People are being shot. I was like, no more of our uniformed men and women have to do that. Or they shouldn't have to go through that because they're just doing their job. They're just protecting us in the way they're trained to do. So I felt the need to -- yeah.

PAT: What kind of feedback have you gotten since you've done this? Is it positive?

LEXI: It's definitely been a mixture regardless. I knew it was going to happen. Definitely negative. Definitely positive. I'm just letting it -- the wave ride. Riding the wave.

GLENN: What did your grandparents say when you came home and they saw your picture?

LEXI: They actually didn't even know honestly. I showed them. And like news stations have been calling. And they sat with me and heard me speak. They're just -- they -- they support me. They just want me to be careful because --

GLENN: It's dangerous.

LEXI: They're grandparents, they want to protect me.

GLENN: Right. And you realize what you did was dangerous, right?

LEXI: Oh, of course. I knew the consequences when I stepped there.

GLENN: Lexi, I still don't know exactly why you did it, but I'm glad you did it. And I think courage is contagious. And it was -- it was brave of you to do that last night.

LEXI: I was just doing what I felt was right, honestly. I don't think it was brave at all.

GLENN: Good for you, Lexi. God bless you. Thank you so much. Appreciate it.

LEXI: Thank you, sir. I appreciate your call.

GLENN: You bet. That's interesting.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Talking to her was fascinating. She's not -- she's not starting a movement. She's not -- did you hear what she said? I was just doing what I felt was right.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.