Is it time to start regulating remote-controlled cars?

The killers in yesterday's San Bernardino massacre reportedly left behind an explosive device, fleeing the scene with the bomb controller in their hands, like that of a remote-controlled car.

Stu pointed this fact out to Glenn during the radio program Thursday, sardonically calling for more regulation on remote-controlled cars to curb such violent acts in the future.

"We need common sense restrictions on remote-controlled cars," Stu said sarcastically. "Can we push that through, please, people?"

Listen to the clip from the radio program or read the transcript below.

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors.

GLENN: Hmm. Authorities are searching for a moment -- a motive in the deadly San Bernardino shooting. The family has gathered together, right where you would gather together, of course, if you wanted to make sure that your family, you know, was just open and honest. You go right to CAIR, and you would have your first press conference with the CAIR officials around you.

STU: The Council for American-Islamic Relations. Is that it?

GLENN: Yeah, that's it.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: You know, the one that is an unindicted coconspirator in the Holy Land Trial.

STU: Yeah, that -- that group. Yeah. That's my first --

GLENN: That one. The Muslim Brotherhood front group.

STU: That's probably my first stop.

GLENN: Yeah, that would be the first stop.

STU: I mean, it's my first stop before I start asking for a national conversation on background checks for people who buy remote-controlled cars. Now, this --

GLENN: Excuse me? What?

STU: Well, the killers had remote-control explosive devices, somehow attached to remote-controlled cars in the building.


STU: And so certainly the gun thing is the important thing to talk about because, of course, all of the gun legislation that Obama talks about is in place in California.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: These guns were purchased legally. He had no history of mental illness. None of the gun laws proposed would have stopped this, of course --

GLENN: That's why I would respect him if he just came out today and said, "I'm going to confiscate all 300 -- well, it's actually more like 700 million guns off the streets of America.

STU: That would go well.

GLENN: It would start a civil war. But at least he would be honest. He's saying it in covert ways. He's saying, you know, we got to do what they did in Australia. We have to take these common sense moves that they did in Great Britain. Well, that was confiscation of guns. And at least he wouldn't lie to us anymore. I'm tired of the lies. You want to confiscate the guns, go ahead. Let's have that national conversation.

PAT: Instead, he'll deny that.

GLENN: Oh, yeah, vehemently.

PAT: Vehemently.

STU: Common sense.

GLENN: Common sense.

STU: And that's why we need common sense restrictions on remote-controlled cars. Can we push that through, please, people? Anyone can go in there and buy a remote-controlled car and strap explosives to it. The guy had bombs too. They had explosive devices. If they didn't have guns, they would have blown people up with explosive devices. I doubt either one would want to -- would care. I mean, if you're dead, you're dead. It doesn't matter how you die.

Featured Image: INDYCAR driver Graham Rahal races a remote controlled car against his fiancee Courtney Force, NHRA's winningest female driver (not pictured), during a racing skills challenge at Sonoma Raceway on July 22, 2015 in Sonoma, California. (Photo by Lachlan Cunningham/Getty Images)

POLL: Should Universities allow pro-Hamas protests?

Joseph Prezioso / Contributor | Getty Images

Just one day after Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel, which left over 1,400 people Israelis dead, 34 different student groups from Harvard University wrote a joint statement pinning the blame of Hamas' terrorist attack on Israel. In the following days after publishing this callous statement, these students staged a walkout and rallied in support of the Palestinians. As Glenn has discussed, this is not an isolated event, and campuses across the country have hosted similar rallies where antisemitic jargon like "we don't want no Jew state" and "globalize the intifada" is freely spewed.

Should Universities allow pro-Hamas protests?

While the Universities have not officially backed any of these rallies or student groups that organized them, they haven't stopped them either, which raises the question: should they? On one hand, these are American students in American Universities, who are protected by the First Amendment. On the other hand, history tells us how dangerous antisemitism is if left unchecked; and what of the rights of Jewish students to be safe on the campuses they pay to attend? Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Should Universities allow pro-Hamas protests? 

Would you feel safe if your child attended a University that allowed pro-Hamas protests?

 Should Universities allow pro-Israel protests?

Is pro-Hamas rhetoric protected by the First Amendment?

POLL: What do YOU think Israel should do about Gaza?

SAID KHATIB / Contributor | Getty Images

Should Israel take over Gaza after defeating Hamas? This contentious historical question has resurfaced amid Israel's retaliatory airstrikes in Gaza following Hamas' terror attacks, which resulted in the greatest death of Jews since the Holocaust. Biden and the global elites have warned Israel against occupation of the Palestinian territory. When asked on 60 Minutes if he would support the Israeli occupation of Gaza, Biden said, “I think it would be a big mistake.” Today Glenn responded to Biden’s answer: “I don't think it's a mistake to occupy."

This has been a long-standing, polarizing issue that is now more relevant than ever, and we want to hear YOUR thoughts. Let us know in the poll below:

Would you support an Israeli occupation of Gaza?

Do you think the Israeli airstrikes in Gaza are justified?

Do you think a two-state solution is still possible?

Funding IRAN?! Here are the TOP 5 reasons Joe Biden should be IMPEACHED

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

On September 12th, the House announced an official impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden with allegations of abuse of power, obstruction, and corruption. Naturally, the media quickly jumped to the President’s aid claiming that “there is no evidence to support these claims” and that the whole affair is a witch hunt.

If you’ve been listening to Glenn, you know that this is simply not the case. Biden has been committing impeachment-worthy deeds before he even stepped foot into the Oval Office—there’s no shortage of evidence to justify this inquiry. Here are 5 scathing reasons why Biden should be impeached:

He was responsible for the Afghanistan withdrawal disaster.

Click here for full video

The Biden administration began with the US's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Under his watch, Biden left thousands of US citizens and allies stranded in the Taliban's hostile regime. Countless Afghan allies have been murdered by the Taliban due to the Biden administration's negligence.

He was involved with Hunter Biden's illicit foreign business dealings.

Click here for full video

There is clear evidence that Joe Biden was more than aware of his son Hunter's foreign business dealings. From suspicious money laundering through the Biden family's accounts to Joe's involvement with important business meetings within Hunter's company, there is mounting evidence to warrant an impeachment inquiry.

He lied about his involvement with Hunter's business dealings.

Click here for full video

Not only did Biden involve himself with his son's less-than-legal foreign business ventures, but he lied to the American people about it too, claiming he had NO KNOWLEDGE of what was going on.

He failed to protect the Southern border, and actively made it worse.

Click here for full video

Biden singlehandedly turned the Southern border into the worst illegal immigration crisis in US history. He reversed many policies set in place by the Trump administration, resulting in 2.3 million illegal immigrants flooding into the US under his watch, a historic high.


Click here for full video

Biden reversed the Trump-era policy that halted all funds going into Iran. The Wall Street Journal revealed the smoking-gun evidence proving that Iran trained AND funded Hamas before its gruesome terror attacks against Israel. Moreover, shortly before the attacks, the Biden administration unfroze $6 BILLION dollars of Iran's assets as a part of a prisoner swap. On top of this, Biden resumed $200 million worth of "humanitarian aid" to Gaza that Trump had ended—because the money was being used to buy weapons for Hamas.

Top 5 economic milestones that show HOW BAD Bidenomics has made the economy

SAUL LOEB / Contributor | Getty Images

From groceries to house prices, everything seems to get more expensive, and you can thank Biden for that. Glenn recently exposed the truth about 'Bidenomics' and the havoc it has wrought on the American economy. Here are five economic milestones during the Biden administration that expose the glaring track record of "Bidenomics:"

In July 2022, the inflation rate hit 9.1 percent, a 40-year record high.

In June 2022, gas hit an all time record high of $5 a gallon for the national average.

61 percent of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck as of this September.

Interest rates reached a 15-year high at 5.25 percent and are still increasing.

Americans have $1 trillion in collective credit card debt, in part due to food/staple pieces being very high.