Is it time to start regulating remote-controlled cars?

The killers in yesterday's San Bernardino massacre reportedly left behind an explosive device, fleeing the scene with the bomb controller in their hands, like that of a remote-controlled car.

Stu pointed this fact out to Glenn during the radio program Thursday, sardonically calling for more regulation on remote-controlled cars to curb such violent acts in the future.

"We need common sense restrictions on remote-controlled cars," Stu said sarcastically. "Can we push that through, please, people?"

Listen to the clip from the radio program or read the transcript below.

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors.

GLENN: Hmm. Authorities are searching for a moment -- a motive in the deadly San Bernardino shooting. The family has gathered together, right where you would gather together, of course, if you wanted to make sure that your family, you know, was just open and honest. You go right to CAIR, and you would have your first press conference with the CAIR officials around you.

STU: The Council for American-Islamic Relations. Is that it?

GLENN: Yeah, that's it.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: You know, the one that is an unindicted coconspirator in the Holy Land Trial.

STU: Yeah, that -- that group. Yeah. That's my first --

GLENN: That one. The Muslim Brotherhood front group.

STU: That's probably my first stop.

GLENN: Yeah, that would be the first stop.

STU: I mean, it's my first stop before I start asking for a national conversation on background checks for people who buy remote-controlled cars. Now, this --

GLENN: Excuse me? What?

STU: Well, the killers had remote-control explosive devices, somehow attached to remote-controlled cars in the building.


STU: And so certainly the gun thing is the important thing to talk about because, of course, all of the gun legislation that Obama talks about is in place in California.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: These guns were purchased legally. He had no history of mental illness. None of the gun laws proposed would have stopped this, of course --

GLENN: That's why I would respect him if he just came out today and said, "I'm going to confiscate all 300 -- well, it's actually more like 700 million guns off the streets of America.

STU: That would go well.

GLENN: It would start a civil war. But at least he would be honest. He's saying it in covert ways. He's saying, you know, we got to do what they did in Australia. We have to take these common sense moves that they did in Great Britain. Well, that was confiscation of guns. And at least he wouldn't lie to us anymore. I'm tired of the lies. You want to confiscate the guns, go ahead. Let's have that national conversation.

PAT: Instead, he'll deny that.

GLENN: Oh, yeah, vehemently.

PAT: Vehemently.

STU: Common sense.

GLENN: Common sense.

STU: And that's why we need common sense restrictions on remote-controlled cars. Can we push that through, please, people? Anyone can go in there and buy a remote-controlled car and strap explosives to it. The guy had bombs too. They had explosive devices. If they didn't have guns, they would have blown people up with explosive devices. I doubt either one would want to -- would care. I mean, if you're dead, you're dead. It doesn't matter how you die.

Featured Image: INDYCAR driver Graham Rahal races a remote controlled car against his fiancee Courtney Force, NHRA's winningest female driver (not pictured), during a racing skills challenge at Sonoma Raceway on July 22, 2015 in Sonoma, California. (Photo by Lachlan Cunningham/Getty Images)

COVID is back! Or that is what we’re being told anyway...

A recent spike in COVID cases has triggered the left's alarm bells, and the following institutions have begun to reinstate COVID-era mandates. You might want to avoid them if you enjoy breathing freely...

Do YOU think institutions should bring back COVID-era mandates if cases increase? Let us know your thoughts HERE.

Morris Brown College

Both of Upstate Medical's hospitals in Syracuse, New York

Corey Henry / Senior Staff Photographer | The Daily Orange

Auburn Community Hospital, New York

Kevin Rivoli / The Citizen | Auburn Pub

Lionsgate Studio

AaronP/Bauer-Griffin / Contributor | GETTY IMAGES

United Health Services in New York

Kaiser Permanente in California

Justin Sullivan / Staff | GETTY IMAGES

There was a time when both the Left and the Right agreed that parents have the final say in raising their children... Not anymore.

In the People's Republic of California, the STATE, not parents, will determine whether children should undergo transgender treatments. The California state legislature just passed a law that will require judges in child custody cases to consider whether parents support a child’s gender transition. According to the law, the state now thinks total affirmation is an integral part of a child’s “health, safety, and welfare.”

We are inching closer to a dystopia where the state, not the parents, have ultimate rights over their children, a history that people from former Soviet nations would feign repeating.

Glenn dove into the law AND MORE in this episode titled, "Parental Advisory: The EXPLICIT plot to control YOUR kids." To get all the research that went into this episode AND information on how YOU can fight back, enter your email address below:

If you didn't catch Wednesday night's Glenn TV special, be sure to check it out HERE!

The Biden admin has let in MORE illegal aliens than the populations of THESE 15 states

GUILLERMO ARIAS / Contributor | Getty Images

There are currently an estimated 16.8 MILLION illegal aliens residing in the United States as of June 2023, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). This number is already 1.3 million higher than FAIR's January 2022 estimate of 15.5 million and a 2.3 million increase from its end-of-2020 estimate. Even Democrats like New York City's Mayor Adams Mayor Adams are waking up to what Conservatives have been warning for years: we are in a border CRISIS.

However, this isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010. In the first two years of the Biden administration alone, the illegal alien population increased by 16 PERCENT nationwide, imposing a whopping net cost of $150.6 BILLION PER YEAR on American taxpayers. That is nearly DOUBLE the total amount that the Biden administration has sent to Ukraine.

This isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010.

These large numbers often make it difficult to conceptualize the sheer impact of illegal immigration on the United States. To put it in perspective, we have listed ALL 15 states and the District of Colombia that have smaller populations than the 2.3 MILLION illegal immigrants, who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration. That is more than the entire populations of Wyoming, Vermont, and South Dakota COMBINED—and the American taxpayers have to pay the price.

Here are all 16 states/districts that have FEWER people than the illegal immigrants who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration.

1. New Mexico

Population: 2,110,011

2. Idaho

Population: 1,973,752

3. Nebraska

Population: 1,972,292

4. West Virginia

Population: 1,764,786

5. Hawaii

Population: 1,433,238

6. New Hampshire

Population: 1,402,957

7. Maine

Population: 1,393,442

8. Montana

Population: 1,139,507

9. Rhode Island

Population: 1,090,483

10. Delaware

Population: 1,031,985

11. South Dakota

Population: 923,484

12. North Dakota

Population: 780,588

13. Alaska

Population: 732,984

14. Washington DC

Population: 674,815

15. Vermont

Population: 647,156

16. Wyoming

Population: 583,279

POLL: Should the Government control the future of AI?

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

Earlier this week, tech titans, lawmakers, and union leaders met on Capitol Hill to discuss the future of AI regulation. The three-hour meeting boasted an impressive roster of tech leaders including, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and others, along with more than 60 US Senators.

Tech Titans and Senators gathered in the Kennedy Caucus Room.The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

The meeting was closed to the public, so what was exactly discussed is unknown. However, what we do know is that a majority of the CEOs support AI regulation, the most vocal of which is Elon Musk. During the meeting, Musk called AI "a double-edged sword" and strongly pushed for regulation in the interest of public safety.

A majority of the CEOs support AI regulation.

Many other related issues were discussed, including the disruption AI has caused to the job market. As Glenn has discussed on his program, the potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real, and many have already felt the effects. From taxi drivers to Hollywood actors and writers, AI's presence can be felt everywhere and lawmakers are unsure how to respond.

The potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real.

Ultimately, the meeting's conclusion was less than decisive, with several Senators making comments to the tune of "we need more time before we act." The White House is expected to release an executive order regarding AI regulation by the end of the year. But now it's YOUR turn to tell us what YOU think needs to be done!

Should A.I. be regulated?

Can the government be trusted with the power to regulate A.I.? 

Can Silicon Valley be trusted to regulate AI? 

Should AI development be slowed for safety, despite its potential advantages?

If a job can be done cheaper and better by AI, should it be taken away from a human?

Do you feel that your job is threatened by AI?