Hell Hath Frozen Over: Liberals Taking a Stand Against Hillary Clinton

October 31, 2016

Writer

The world is upside down. Key liberal voices are speaking out objectively against Hillary Clinton in the wake of the FBI's move to reopen the investigation of her email server. The Chicago Tribune recently published an op-ed recommending Democrats ask Hillary to step down. Doug Schoen, a liberal strategist who worked for Bill Clinton, spoke with Fox News and declared he could no longer support Hillary Clinton. And now, Mika Brzezinski with MSNBC has taken an introspective look at the Democrats' presidential nominee:

Watching this whole weekend, I will say, first of all, everyone talks about what Comey did as being outrageous. This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don't really get that. The bottom line is, this all goes back to the server, something that she shouldn't have done, something that was way more than a mistake. Way more. And this is a self-inflicted, massive wound. And I . . . I just kept thinking how I've been on my horse, going after Republicans and the Republican Party. You nominated this guy. You nominated Donald Trump. How could you do that? When I'm thinking, Democrats nominated someone who is under an FBI investigation for having a private server, among other things.

By any measure, it's an incredible turn of events.

"I mean, that's incredible. There's your pathway to reconciliation. You recognize your wrongs. I'll recognize my wrongs. Now, let's move forward," Glenn said Monday on his radio program.

Read below or listen to the full segment for answers to these shocking questions:

• What is Doug Schoen's objection to a Hillary Clinton presidency?

• How stunned was Fox News anchor Harris Faulkner at Schoen's turnaround?

• Which former presidents look like a dream come true right now?

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors:

GLENN: Democrat campaign consultant, worked for the Clintons -- Bill Clinton's reelection bid in '96, Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in '08, Democratic consultant.

He is a friend of the Clintons. New audio on what he's going to do now.

He has already endorsed Hillary Clinton. Listen now.

VOICE: Given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election --

VOICE: No matter who wins.

VOICE: -- no matter who wins, but if the Secretary of State wins, we will have a president under criminal investigation with Huma Abedin under investigation, the Secretary of State, the president-elect, should she win, under investigation. Harris, under these circumstances, I am actively reassessing my support. I'm not a Trump --

VOICE: Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait a minute.

VOICE: Right.

VOICE: You're not going to vote for Hillary Clinton?

VOICE: Harris, I'm deeply concerned that we will have a constitutional crisis if she's elected.

VOICE: Wow.

PAT: Wow.

VOICE: I want to learn more this week. See what we see. But as of today, I am not a supporter of the Secretary of State for the --

VOICE: How long have you known the Clintons, Doug?

VOICE: I've known the Clintons since '94.

PAT: Wow. Wow.

GLENN: I mean, Stu is -- Stu said an hour ago -- I mean, I all right. I mean, I still think that the lines of the supporters and those who are against Donald Trump, just like those -- if this would have happened to Donald Trump, I think the same could be said that what Donald Trump said about going out on Fifth Avenue and shooting people applies to Hillary Clinton too, that she could go out and shoot people. And nobody would say anything. And, in fact, some people do think she shot people.

JEFFY: Yeah.

GLENN: But this is an example of her being absolutely totally corrupt. And is anybody going to change their mind?

Stu, you may be right. This is a pretty big one. And another big one was Mika on MSNBC.

Now, is there any time that you have heard Mika do anything but fawn over the Clintons? Listen to this.

MIKA: Watching this whole weekend, I will say first of all, everyone talks about what Comey did as being outrageous. This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don't really get that.

The bottom line is, this all goes back to the server, something that she shouldn't have done, something that was way more than a mistake. Way more. And this is a self-inflicted, massive wound.

And I -- I just kept thinking how I've been on my horse, going after Republicans and the Republican Party. You nominated this guy. You nominated Donald Trump. How could you do that?

When I'm thinking, Democrats nominated someone who is under an FBI investigation for having a private server among other things.

PAT: It's incredible.

JEFFY: Wow.

PAT: You just -- you don't expect an honest assessment.

GLENN: No, listen to what's happening.

PAT: From Mika Brzezinski, you don't expect that.

GLENN: Listen what is happening. What did she just do?

She did what I did. She's done what I've done: Look, I could talk about the other side all day long. I can't affect the other side. I can only affect me.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I can't even affect our side, but I can affect me.

PAT: Otherwise, who would be the nominee right now? It wouldn't be Donald Trump. If we could affect our side, it wouldn't be Donald Trump.

GLENN: Yeah. If we could affect our side, it wouldn't be Donald Trump. It would be Ted Cruz. If Mika could affect her side, now maybe she knows, "Wow, it shouldn't have been Hillary Clinton." That's remarkable. People are starting to wake up because we all know, both sides know, this is a Dumpster fire. These two candidates are the worst two candidates in American history, bar none. Bar none.

If you think that George Bush, lefties -- if you think George Bush embarrassed us on the global scale -- because that's all we heard was George Bush was an embarrassment. We have no credibility around the globe because of how bad George Bush is. You wanted to restore credibility. Then we spent eight years with Barack Obama, who we feel destroyed our credibility.

JEFFY: Because you did.

GLENN: Can I tell you something? Both of those people look like dreams come true at this point.

We are the laughingstock of the world. In fact, I believe the world is starting to be afraid of America because this time it's not the candidates.

Oh, we didn't know. I mean, I know, only some of us knew.

No, everybody knows. You know who you're voting for when you're voting for Donald Trump. Just the same as the Democrats know exactly who they're voting for when they're voting for Hillary Clinton. We're just dismissing them because they're playing for the red and the blue team. That's the only difference. We just dismiss it.

And you just heard Mika -- play that again. And play it all the way to the end, please.

MIKA: Watching this whole weekend, I will say first of all, everyone talks about what Comey did as big outrageous. This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don't really get that. The bottom line is, this all goes back to the server, something she shouldn't have done, something that was way more than a mistake -- way more. And this is a self-inflicted, massive wound. And I -- I just kept thinking how I've been on my horse going after Republicans and the Republican Party.

You nominated this guy. You nominated Donald Trump. How could you do that? But I'm thinking Democrats nominated someone who is under an FBI investigation for having a private server, among other things.

So here we are.

GLENN: I mean, that's incredible.

JEFFY: Wow.

GLENN: There's your pathway to reconciliation.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: There's your pathway to reconciliation. You recognize your wrongs. I'll recognize my wrongs. Now, let's move forward.

Featured Image: Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally at Dickerson Community Center on October 29, 2016 in Daytona Beach, Florida. With less than two weeks to go until Election Day, Hillary Clinton is campaigning in Florida. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

EXPOSED: Your tax dollars FUND Marxist riots in LA

Anadolu / Contributor | Getty Images

Protesters wore Che shirts, waved foreign flags, and chanted Marxist slogans — but corporate media still peddles the ‘spontaneous outrage’ narrative.

I sat in front of the television this weekend, watching the glittering spectacle of corporate media do what it does best: tell me not to believe my lying eyes.

According to the polished news anchors, what I was witnessing in Los Angeles was “mostly peaceful protests.” They said it with all the earnest gravitas of someone reading a bedtime story, while behind them the streets looked like a deleted scene from “Mad Max.” Federal agents dodged concrete slabs as if it were an Olympic sport. A man in a Che Guevara crop top tried to set a police car on fire. Dumpster fires lit the night sky like some sort of postapocalyptic luau.

If you suggest that violent criminals should be deported or imprisoned, you’re painted as the extremist.

But sure, it was peaceful. Tear gas clouds and Molotov cocktails are apparently the incense and candles of this new civic religion.

The media expects us to play along — to nod solemnly while cities burn and to call it “activism.”

Let’s call this what it is: delusion.

Another ‘peaceful’ riot

If the Titanic “mostly floated” and the Hindenburg “mostly flew,” then yes, the latest L.A. riots are “mostly peaceful.” But history tends to care about those tiny details at the end — like icebergs and explosions.

The coverage was full of phrases like “spontaneous,” “grassroots,” and “organic,” as if these protests materialized from thin air. But many of the signs and banners looked like they’d been run off at ComradesKinkos.com — crisp print jobs with slogans promoting socialism, communism, and various anti-American regimes. Palestinian flags waved beside banners from Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba, and El Salvador. It was like someone looted a United Nations souvenir shop and turned it into a revolution starter pack.

And guess who funded it? You did.

According to at least one report, much of this so-called spontaneous rage fest was paid for with your tax dollars. Tens of millions of dollars from the Biden administration ensured your paycheck funded Trotsky cosplayers chucking firebombs at local coffee shops.

The same aging radicals from the 1970s — now armed with tenure, pensions, and book deals — are cheering from the sidelines, waxing poetic about how burning a squad car is “liberation.” These are the same folks who once wore tie-dye and flew to help guerrilla fighters and now applaud chaos under the banner of “progress.”

This is not progress. It is not protest. It’s certainly not justice or peace.

It’s an attempt to dismantle the American system — and if you dare say that out loud, you’re labeled a bigot, a fascist, or, worst of all, someone who notices reality.

And what sparked this taxpayer-funded riot? Enforcement against illegal immigrants — many of whom, according to official arrest records, are repeat violent offenders. These are not the “dreamers” or the huddled masses yearning to breathe free. These are criminals with long, violent rap sheets — allowed to remain free by a broken system that prioritizes ideology over public safety.

Photo by Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg | Getty Images

This is what people are rioting over — not the mistreatment of the innocent, but the arrest of the guilty. And in California, that’s apparently a cause for outrage.

The average American, according to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, is supposed to worry they’ll be next. But unless you’re in the habit of assaulting people, smuggling, or firing guns into people’s homes, you probably don’t have much to fear.

Still, if you suggest that violent criminals should be deported or imprisoned, you’re painted as the extremist.

The left has lost it

This is what happens when a culture loses its grip on reality. We begin to call arson “art,” lawlessness “liberation,” and criminals “community members.” We burn the good and excuse the evil — all while the media insists it’s just “vibes.”

But it’s not just vibes. It’s violence, paid for by you, endorsed by your elected officials, and whitewashed by newsrooms with more concern for hair and lighting than for truth.

This isn’t activism. This is anarchism. And Democratic politicians are fueling the flame.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Glenn Beck's 'No King but Christ' merch: Will faith STOP the chaos?

On Saturday, June 14, 2025 (President Trump's 79th birthday), the "No Kings" protest—a noisy spectacle orchestrated by progressive heavyweights like Randi Weingarten and her union cronies—will take place in Washington, D.C.

Thousands will chant "no thrones, no crowns, no king," claiming to fend off authoritarianism and corruption.

But let’s cut through the noise. The protesters' grievances—rigged courts, deported citizens, slashed services—are a house of cards. Zero Americans have been deported, Federal services are still bloated, and if anyone is rigging the courts, it's the Left. So why rally now, especially with riots already flaring in L.A.?

Chaos isn’t a side effect here—it’s the plan.

This is not about liberty; it's a power grab dressed up as resistance. The "No Kings" crowd wants you to buy their script: government’s the enemy—unless they’re the ones running it. It's the identical script from 2020: same groups, same tactics, same goal, different name.

But Glenn is flipping the script. He's dropping a new "No Kings but Christ" merch line, just in time for the protest. Merch that proclaims one truth: no earthly ruler owns us; only Christ does. It’s a bold, faith-rooted rejection of this secular circus.

Why should you care? Because this won’t just be a rally—it’ll be a symptom. Distrust in institutions is sky-high, and rightly so, but the "No Kings" answer is a hollow shout into the void. Glenn’s merch begs the question: if you’re ditching kings, who’s really in charge? Get yours and wear the answer proudly.

Truth unleashed: 95% say media’s excuses for anti-Semitism are a LIE

ELI IMADALI / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn asked for YOUR take on the rising tide of anti-Semitism, and you delivered. After the Boulder attack, you made it clear: this isn’t just a news story—it’s a crisis the elites are dodging.

Your verdict is unmistakable: 96% of you see anti-Semitism as a growing threat in the U.S., brushing aside the establishment’s weak excuses. The spin does not fool you—95% say the media is deliberately downplaying the issue, hiding a cultural rot that’s all too real. And the government’s response? A whopping 95% of you call it a disgraceful failure, leaving communities exposed.

Your voices shatter the silence. Why should we trust narratives that dismiss your concerns? With 97% of you warning that anti-Semitism will surge in the years ahead, you’re demanding action and accountability. This is your stand for truth.

You spoke, and Glenn listened. Your bold response sends a message to those who’d rather ignore the problem. Keep raising your voice at Glennbeck.com—your input drives the fight for justice. Take part in the next poll and continue shaping the conversation.

Want to make your voice heard? Check out more polls HERE.

JPMorgan Chase CEO issues dire warning about America's prosperity

Win McNamee / Staff | Getty Images

Jamie Dimon has a grim forecast for America — and it’s not a recession. He sees a fragile nation drifting into crisis while its leaders fight over TikTok.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase — one of the most powerful financial institutions on earth — issued a warning the other day. But it wasn’t about interest rates, crypto, or monetary policy.

Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum in California, Dimon pivoted from economic talking points to something far more urgent: the fragile state of America’s physical preparedness.

We are living in a moment of stunning fragility — culturally, economically, and militarily. It means we can no longer afford to confuse digital distractions with real resilience.

“We shouldn’t be stockpiling Bitcoin,” Dimon said. “We should be stockpiling guns, tanks, planes, drones, and rare earths. We know we need to do it. It’s not a mystery.”

He cited internal Pentagon assessments showing that if war were to break out in the South China Sea, the United States has only enough precision-guided missiles for seven days of sustained conflict.

Seven days — that’s the gap between deterrence and desperation.

This wasn’t a forecast about inflation or a hedge against market volatility. It was a blunt assessment from a man whose words typically move markets.

“America is the global hegemon,” Dimon continued, “and the free world wants us to be strong.” But he warned that Americans have been lulled into “a false sense of security,” made complacent by years of peacetime prosperity, outsourcing, and digital convenience:

We need to build a permanent, long-term, realistic strategy for the future of America — economic growth, fiscal policy, industrial policy, foreign policy. We need to educate our citizens. We need to take control of our economic destiny.

This isn’t a partisan appeal — it’s a sobering wake-up call. Because our economy and military readiness are not separate issues. They are deeply intertwined.

Dimon isn’t alone in raising concerns. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has warned that China has already overtaken the U.S. in key defense technologies — hypersonic missiles, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence to mention a few. Retired military leaders continue to highlight our shrinking shipyards and dwindling defense manufacturing base.

Even the dollar, once assumed untouchable, is under pressure as BRICS nations work to undermine its global dominance. Dimon, notably, has said this effort could succeed if the U.S. continues down its current path.

So what does this all mean?

Christopher Furlong / Staff | Getty Images

It means we are living in a moment of stunning fragility — culturally, economically, and militarily. It means we can no longer afford to confuse digital distractions with real resilience.

It means the future belongs to nations that understand something we’ve forgotten: Strength isn’t built on slogans or algorithms. It’s built on steel, energy, sovereignty, and trust.

And at the core of that trust is you, the citizen. Not the influencer. Not the bureaucrat. Not the lobbyist. At the core is the ordinary man or woman who understands that freedom, safety, and prosperity require more than passive consumption. They require courage, clarity, and conviction.

We need to stop assuming someone else will fix it. The next crisis — whether military, economic, or cyber — will not politely pause for our political dysfunction to sort itself out. It will demand leadership, unity, and grit.

And that begins with looking reality in the eye. We need to stop talking about things that don’t matter and cut to the chase: The U.S. is in a dangerously fragile position, and it’s time to rebuild and refortify — from the inside out.