If Democrats Voted for Gorsuch in 2006, Why Wouldn't They Now?

Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch was perfectly palatable to many Democrats in 2016 when he was confirmed as a federal judge --- but the stakes are much higher now.

"Now, surely, there's going to be an extreme distaste for Mr. Gorsuch," Co-host Stu Burguiere said Wednesday on The Glenn Beck Program.

Will Democrats try to tear apart Gorsuch as they did Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas? Unless something real lurks in the shadows, any salvos fired a Gorsuch's character will be contrived and the latest in a steady stream of fake news coming from the mainstream media and Washington D.C.

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

STU: Neil Gorsuch was confirmed in 2006 to his current role. Here's some people that voted for him: Dianne Feinstein. Ron Wyden. Richard Durbin, Dick Durbin. Chuck Schumer. Bill Nelson. Debbie Stabenow. Maria Cantwell. Bob Menendez. And four more you might know: Hillary Clinton.


STU: John Kerry.

PAT: Uh-huh.

STU: Joe Biden.

PAT: Uh-huh.

STU: And another senator from Illinois, Barack Obama. Just those people thought he was fine in 2006. But now, surely, there's going to be an extreme distaste for --

GLENN: Oh, yeah --

STU: -- for Mr. Gorsuch.

GLENN: No, now he's -- now he's Bork. Now he's Bork.

STU: Yeah. I think there's -- a lot of people are saying, "Maybe they won't go after this one, because if they force the Republicans to use the nuclear option here, they'll use it again for sure when -- if Ginsburg or Kennedy were to leave."

GLENN: I guarantee you -- I guarantee you, Donald Trump will use the nuclear option. Guarantee it.

PAT: Well, he doesn't have that option. But I guess he could encourage McConnell to do that.

GLENN: Yes. But I guarantee you that they will use the nuclear option. And --

STU: The thought is, if they don't use it this time, maybe they have an argument for them not to use it next time.

If they use it -- if they force -- Democrats force Republicans to use it this time, they'll just use it again if Ginsburg or Kennedy were to go, and then they're really screwed.

GLENN: Yep. Yep.

STU: Which is good for us.

POLL: Should Universities allow pro-Hamas protests?

Joseph Prezioso / Contributor | Getty Images

Just one day after Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel, which left over 1,400 people Israelis dead, 34 different student groups from Harvard University wrote a joint statement pinning the blame of Hamas' terrorist attack on Israel. In the following days after publishing this callous statement, these students staged a walkout and rallied in support of the Palestinians. As Glenn has discussed, this is not an isolated event, and campuses across the country have hosted similar rallies where antisemitic jargon like "we don't want no Jew state" and "globalize the intifada" is freely spewed.

Should Universities allow pro-Hamas protests?

While the Universities have not officially backed any of these rallies or student groups that organized them, they haven't stopped them either, which raises the question: should they? On one hand, these are American students in American Universities, who are protected by the First Amendment. On the other hand, history tells us how dangerous antisemitism is if left unchecked; and what of the rights of Jewish students to be safe on the campuses they pay to attend? Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Should Universities allow pro-Hamas protests? 

Would you feel safe if your child attended a University that allowed pro-Hamas protests?

 Should Universities allow pro-Israel protests?

Is pro-Hamas rhetoric protected by the First Amendment?

POLL: What do YOU think Israel should do about Gaza?

SAID KHATIB / Contributor | Getty Images

Should Israel take over Gaza after defeating Hamas? This contentious historical question has resurfaced amid Israel's retaliatory airstrikes in Gaza following Hamas' terror attacks, which resulted in the greatest death of Jews since the Holocaust. Biden and the global elites have warned Israel against occupation of the Palestinian territory. When asked on 60 Minutes if he would support the Israeli occupation of Gaza, Biden said, “I think it would be a big mistake.” Today Glenn responded to Biden’s answer: “I don't think it's a mistake to occupy."

This has been a long-standing, polarizing issue that is now more relevant than ever, and we want to hear YOUR thoughts. Let us know in the poll below:

Would you support an Israeli occupation of Gaza?

Do you think the Israeli airstrikes in Gaza are justified?

Do you think a two-state solution is still possible?

Funding IRAN?! Here are the TOP 5 reasons Joe Biden should be IMPEACHED

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

On September 12th, the House announced an official impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden with allegations of abuse of power, obstruction, and corruption. Naturally, the media quickly jumped to the President’s aid claiming that “there is no evidence to support these claims” and that the whole affair is a witch hunt.

If you’ve been listening to Glenn, you know that this is simply not the case. Biden has been committing impeachment-worthy deeds before he even stepped foot into the Oval Office—there’s no shortage of evidence to justify this inquiry. Here are 5 scathing reasons why Biden should be impeached:

He was responsible for the Afghanistan withdrawal disaster.

Click here for full video

The Biden administration began with the US's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Under his watch, Biden left thousands of US citizens and allies stranded in the Taliban's hostile regime. Countless Afghan allies have been murdered by the Taliban due to the Biden administration's negligence.

He was involved with Hunter Biden's illicit foreign business dealings.

Click here for full video

There is clear evidence that Joe Biden was more than aware of his son Hunter's foreign business dealings. From suspicious money laundering through the Biden family's accounts to Joe's involvement with important business meetings within Hunter's company, there is mounting evidence to warrant an impeachment inquiry.

He lied about his involvement with Hunter's business dealings.

Click here for full video

Not only did Biden involve himself with his son's less-than-legal foreign business ventures, but he lied to the American people about it too, claiming he had NO KNOWLEDGE of what was going on.

He failed to protect the Southern border, and actively made it worse.

Click here for full video

Biden singlehandedly turned the Southern border into the worst illegal immigration crisis in US history. He reversed many policies set in place by the Trump administration, resulting in 2.3 million illegal immigrants flooding into the US under his watch, a historic high.


Click here for full video

Biden reversed the Trump-era policy that halted all funds going into Iran. The Wall Street Journal revealed the smoking-gun evidence proving that Iran trained AND funded Hamas before its gruesome terror attacks against Israel. Moreover, shortly before the attacks, the Biden administration unfroze $6 BILLION dollars of Iran's assets as a part of a prisoner swap. On top of this, Biden resumed $200 million worth of "humanitarian aid" to Gaza that Trump had ended—because the money was being used to buy weapons for Hamas.

Top 5 economic milestones that show HOW BAD Bidenomics has made the economy

SAUL LOEB / Contributor | Getty Images

From groceries to house prices, everything seems to get more expensive, and you can thank Biden for that. Glenn recently exposed the truth about 'Bidenomics' and the havoc it has wrought on the American economy. Here are five economic milestones during the Biden administration that expose the glaring track record of "Bidenomics:"

In July 2022, the inflation rate hit 9.1 percent, a 40-year record high.

In June 2022, gas hit an all time record high of $5 a gallon for the national average.

61 percent of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck as of this September.

Interest rates reached a 15-year high at 5.25 percent and are still increasing.

Americans have $1 trillion in collective credit card debt, in part due to food/staple pieces being very high.