Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
Shop
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Alex Jones Watch: Children Are Being Kidnapped and Sent to a Secret Colony On Mars

July 05, 2017
Staff

WRITER

A story that very well could be the biggest story in human history broke last week and was reported on by Alex Jones on his show. Wednesday on radio, Glenn and the guys put on their tinfoil hats as they followed Jones down the rabbit hole and broke down the shocking claims.

Jones' guest had this to say:

This may strike your listeners as way out, but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride. So that once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

Alex Jones is no stranger to controversy, but this claim seemed to force even him to recognize the absurdity. He did, however, provide some cover for his guest and add a little spin:

Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. You know, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on. But I know this, we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars. And people say, oh, look, it looks like, you know, mechanics. They go, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening. Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

This one might be kind of hard to prove, but the story did answer some questions for Glenn on another Alex Jones conspiracy.

"That's why they didn't find any children in the pizza place," Glenn said. "They've just been shipped to Mars."

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

PAT: Speaking of aliens, you want to hear about a real frightening alien story that I notice you're avoiding all day. All day he's avoiding the biggest alien story of the day, of the week. Perhaps one of the bigger stories in human history.

JEFFY: Hasn't even mentioned it.

STU: Perhaps!

GLENN: All right. Just give it --

PAT: That was a silly statement.

STU: It was.

PAT: Quite obviously the biggest story in human history.

JEFFY: It's embarrassing you wouldn't even mention it.

GLENN: Just give it to me. Just give it to me.

PAT: This broke the other day. I can't take credit for this. We did not break this. This was broken by Alex Jones on his show, I believe, last week.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out, but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride.

GLENN: Okay.

VOICE: So that once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

GLENN: Wow.

PAT: Wow.

ALEX: Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. You know, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on.

But I know this, we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars. And people say, oh, look, it looks like, you know, mechanics. They go, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening. Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

PAT: The child sex slave industry in Mars.

STU: What the hell was that clip --

PAT: I mean, why are we not talking about this? Why is something not being done? These children -- well, they're not children by the time they get there, granted. Okay.

GLENN: It's like a six months' trip to Mars.

PAT: I know. Why is it 20 years? Are they traveling --

GLENN: They may be using an old VanoLiner.

STU: Oh, okay. Yeah.

PAT: On the Chevy Astro van.

GLENN: The Chevy Astro van.

PAT: Top speed, about 40 miles an hour.

GLENN: Yeah. Scooby-Doo. They were using the -- it was twenty years. They got the --

PAT: Twenty-year trip.

GLENN: What was it? The Mystery Machine. Yeah, but what kind of van was it? Not the new one. Not the new one --

JEFFY: No, those were those Handi-Vans.

GLENN: Yes.

JEFFY: Those little Chevy Handi-Vans with the wheel up front.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Yeah, I see you driving a white one around some neighborhoods sometimes.

JEFFY: Sell ice cream. Got to make some extra money somewhere. What are you talking about?

PAT: Just a little ice cream. Nothing wrong with that.

(laughter)

STU: That is a --

GLENN: Don't come around my house. I'll buy you out of ice cream every time you're in my neighborhood, brother.

STU: Wait. Can we discuss his actual point there? Because, first of all, you can see Alex Jones actually senses the media is going to make fun of him on this one.

PAT: Well, yeah.

STU: He's like, well, the media is going to jump all over this one. But his instinct is to still defend the guy.

PAT: Let me tell you something, NASA, about 90 percent of their missions are secret. Really?

JEFFY: I've been told by high-level NASA engineers, there's a lot going on.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Hang on just a second. You don't even need to get to Alex Jones. You really don't. Just play it again. I'll tell you where to stop.

STU: Really?

PAT: All right.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out.

PAT: No.

VOICE: But we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars --

PAT: Colony on Mars.

VOICE: -- that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: Why even go to Alex Jones?

PAT: I know.

GLENN: I mean, this is enough to feast on for a week.

STU: Well -- it is.

PAT: It is.

STU: Because, you're right. First of all, they were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year journey. First of all, they don't seem to actually be there yet.

GLENN: Who kidnapped?

PAT: Yeah. Who kidnapped them? I guess NASA.

STU: I guess NASA.

So they were kidnapped, they were sent into space on a 20-year mission. Although, he said there is a colony on Mars already. So -- but they don't seem to be there. He doesn't seem to have that down.

GLENN: Well, no. They are there. Because they're forced -- there's no way back. So they're forced to be slaves.

JEFFY: A twenty-year journey.

GLENN: But what are they doing -- what are they building on Mars?

STU: But listen to his wording, he's saying there is a colony on Mars.

PAT: Yes. But it's the colony of child sex slaves. Is it not?

STU: First of all, if they're there by themselves, who is enslaving them. Right? You would need someone to enslave them. And if they're 20-year-olds --

GLENN: Right. And why would they be sex slaves? Why do you just assume this is a sex planet?

PAT: They have no other choice, but --

STU: You somehow turned this story weird. How did you do that?

GLENN: Why does he always go to the darkest places?

STU: But listen to this.

PAT: Listen to this.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out.

PAT: No. Come on now.

VOICE: But we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars.

STU: Colony on Mars.

PAT: Okay. There is a colony on Mars.

STU: Okay. So it's there, right?

VOICE: It is populated by children who were kidnapped.

PAT: Populated by children who were kidnapped.

STU: Who were kidnapped.

VOICE: And sent to space on a 20-year ride.

STU: Okay. Twenty-year ride.

VOICE: So once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

PAT: No alternative. Okay. They have no alternatives but to be slaves.

JEFFY: I mean, no matter what planet they land on, they have no alternative.

GLENN: Yeah, look. Hang on just a second, you land on a planet, there's no food, there's no water, there's nothing. And they're like, use those shovels and make a big house for me because I'm coming at some point. You might kill the guy with a shovel, but as long as he's sending you food and water, yes, you're going to build him whatever he tells you to build.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: Because there's no --

PAT: That's probably true. Unless you have the smarts of, say, Matt Damon and you know how to make potatoes out of your own poop.

JEFFY: Bingo, my friend.

PAT: Why then, maybe you take a chance.

GLENN: And here's the problem. Here's the problem: They went up 17 years before that movie was made. They don't have any idea.

PAT: Yeah, right.

STU: That's true. Now, wait. You're exonerating Alex Jones' point here.

JEFFY: I know.

STU: Because he says -- okay. I know. First of all, he says, I know the media is going to mock this. But then he defends it anyway and tries to figure out a way that it could theoretically be true. Then he makes one of the most amazing odd guttural noises I've ever heard in my life. (sound effect).

(laughter)

But then he says, A, there's lots of wreckage on Mars. It looks like there's mechanics there.

GLENN: Mechanics. Fixing the Astro van! Fixing the Astro van.

JEFFY: Right.

PAT: Yep.

STU: Listen to this one more time. We have to listen to this one more time.

PAT: Do you want to start with Alex?

STU: I think from here is fine. Yeah.

PAT: All right.

VOICE: Now, there's all kind of --

ALEX: Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea. There's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. I mean, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on.

But I know this, we see a bunch of (sound effect), mechanical wreckage --

PAT: We see a bunch of (sound effect).

STU: We got to isolate that.

PAT: We see a lot of that. A lot of (sound effect). You know, I see a lot of (sound effect).

GLENN: What is it about Alex Jones that entertains you two for hours? You guys could listen to him for hours.

JEFFY: Oh.

PAT: I could. I could. We could do just a whole show just on his segments. For sure.

STU: We didn't even get to the mechanic part yet.

PAT: Right. Here's (sound effect).

ALEX: And people say, oh, look, it looks like mechanics. They go, oh, your a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening.

Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

JEFFY: Clearly.

STU: What?

PAT: What?

GLENN: Guys, where do you think -- where do you think all those Chevy Volts went? The government --

PAT: On a slow flight to Mars.

GLENN: Yes. There's no oxygen there. Fire -- what happens to fire with no oxygen? It can't burn. It's the only place the Chevy Volt is safe.

JEFFY: And I will say, as -- as you would expect, NASA has denied that it's running a child slave colony on --

PAT: Those bastards.

STU: Well, of course they're going to say that.

PAT: What are they going to say?

GLENN: That's why they didn't find any children in the pizza place.

PAT: They're all on Mars.

GLENN: They've just been shipped to Mars.

STU: The tunnels go to Mars.

How America’s elites fell for the same lie that fueled Auschwitz

Anadolu / Contributor | Getty Images

The drone footage out of Gaza isn’t just war propaganda — it’s a glimpse of the same darkness that once convinced men they were righteous for killing innocents.

Evil introduces itself subtly. It doesn’t announce, “Hi, I’m here to destroy you.” It whispers. It flatters. It borrows the language of justice, empathy, and freedom, twisting them until hatred sounds righteous and violence sounds brave.

We are watching that same deception unfold again — in the streets, on college campuses, and in the rhetoric of people who should know better. It’s the oldest story in the world, retold with new slogans.

Evil wins when good people mirror its rage.

A drone video surfaced this week showing Hamas terrorists staging the “discovery” of a hostage’s body. They pushed a corpse out of a window, dragged it into a hole, buried it, and then called in aid workers to “find” what they themselves had planted. It was theater — evil, disguised as victimhood. And it was caught entirely on camera.

That’s how evil operates. It never comes in through the front door. It sneaks in, often through manipulative pity. The same spirit animates the moral rot spreading through our institutions — from the halls of universities to the chambers of government.

Take Zohran Mamdani, a New York assemblyman who has praised jihadists and defended pro-Hamas agitators. His father, a Columbia University professor, wrote that America and al-Qaeda are morally equivalent — that suicide bombings shouldn’t be viewed as barbaric. Imagine thinking that way after watching 3,000 Americans die on 9/11. That’s not intellectualism. That’s indoctrination.

Often, that indoctrination comes from hostile foreign actors, peddled by complicit pawns on our own soil. The pro-Hamas protests that erupted across campuses last year, for example, were funded by Iran — a regime that murders its own citizens for speaking freely.

Ancient evil, new clothes

But the deeper danger isn’t foreign money. It’s the spiritual blindness that lets good people believe resentment is justice and envy is discernment. Scripture talks about the spirit of Amalek — the eternal enemy of God’s people, who attacks the weak from behind while the strong look away. Amalek never dies; it just changes its vocabulary and form with the times.

Today, Amalek tweets. He speaks through professors who defend terrorism as “anti-colonial resistance.” He preaches from pulpits that call violence “solidarity.” And he recruits through algorithms, whispering that the Jews control everything, that America had it coming, that chaos is freedom. Those are ancient lies wearing new clothes.

When nations embrace those lies, it’s not the Jews who perish first. It’s the nations themselves. The soul dies long before the body. The ovens of Auschwitz didn’t start with smoke; they started with silence and slogans.

Andrew Harnik / Staff | Getty Images

A time for choosing

So what do we do? We speak truth — calmly, firmly, without venom. Because hatred can’t kill hatred; it only feeds it. Truth, compassion, and courage starve it to death.

Evil wins when good people mirror its rage. That’s how Amalek survives — by making you fight him with his own weapons. The only victory that lasts is moral clarity without malice, courage without cruelty.

The war we’re fighting isn’t new. It’s the same battle between remembrance and amnesia, covenant and chaos, humility and pride. The same spirit that whispered to Pharaoh, to Hitler, and to every mob that thought hatred could heal the world is whispering again now — on your screens, in your classrooms, in your churches.

Will you join it, or will you stand against it?

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Bill Gates ends climate fear campaign, declares AI the future ruler

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

The Big Tech billionaire once said humanity must change or perish. Now he claims we’ll survive — just as elites prepare total surveillance.

For decades, Americans have been told that climate change is an imminent apocalypse — the existential threat that justifies every intrusion into our lives, from banning gas stoves to rationing energy to tracking personal “carbon scores.”

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates helped lead that charge. He warned repeatedly that the “climate disaster” would be the greatest crisis humanity would ever face. He invested billions in green technology and demanded the world reach net-zero emissions by 2050 “to avoid catastrophe.”

The global contest is no longer over barrels and pipelines — it is over who gets to flip the digital switch.

Now, suddenly, he wants everyone to relax: Climate change “will not lead to humanity’s demise” after all.

Gates was making less of a scientific statement and more of a strategic pivot. When elites retire a crisis, it’s never because the threat is gone — it’s because a better one has replaced it. And something else has indeed arrived — something the ruling class finds more useful than fear of the weather.The same day Gates downshifted the doomsday rhetoric, Amazon announced it would pay warehouse workers $30 an hour — while laying off 30,000 people because artificial intelligence will soon do their jobs.

Climate panic was the warm-up. AI control is the main event.

The new currency of power

The world once revolved around oil and gas. Today, it revolves around the electricity demanded by server farms, the chips that power machine learning, and the data that can be used to manipulate or silence entire populations. The global contest is no longer over barrels and pipelines — it is over who gets to flip the digital switch. Whoever controls energy now controls information. And whoever controls information controls civilization.

Climate alarmism gave elites a pretext to centralize power over energy. Artificial intelligence gives them a mechanism to centralize power over people. The future battles will not be about carbon — they will be about control.

Two futures — both ending in tyranny

Americans are already being pushed into what look like two opposing movements, but both leave the individual powerless.

The first is the technocratic empire being constructed in the name of innovation. In its vision, human work will be replaced by machines, and digital permissions will subsume personal autonomy.

Government and corporations merge into a single authority. Your identity, finances, medical decisions, and speech rights become access points monitored by biometric scanners and enforced by automated gatekeepers. Every step, purchase, and opinion is tracked under the noble banner of “efficiency.”

The second is the green de-growth utopia being marketed as “compassion.” In this vision, prosperity itself becomes immoral. You will own less because “the planet” requires it. Elites will redesign cities so life cannot extend beyond a 15-minute walking radius, restrict movement to save the Earth, and ration resources to curb “excess.” It promises community and simplicity, but ultimately delivers enforced scarcity. Freedom withers when surviving becomes a collective permission rather than an individual right.

Both futures demand that citizens become manageable — either automated out of society or tightly regulated within it. The ruling class will embrace whichever version gives them the most leverage in any given moment.

Climate panic was losing its grip. AI dependency — and the obedience it creates — is far more potent.

The forgotten way

A third path exists, but it is the one today’s elites fear most: the path laid out in our Constitution. The founders built a system that assumes human beings are not subjects to be monitored or managed, but moral agents equipped by God with rights no government — and no algorithm — can override.

Hesham Elsherif / Stringer | Getty Images

That idea remains the most “disruptive technology” in history. It shattered the belief that people need kings or experts or global committees telling them how to live. No wonder elites want it erased.

Soon, you will be told you must choose: Live in a world run by machines or in a world stripped down for planetary salvation. Digital tyranny or rationed equality. Innovation without liberty or simplicity without dignity.

Both are traps.

The only way

The only future worth choosing is the one grounded in ordered liberty — where prosperity and progress exist alongside moral responsibility and personal freedom and human beings are treated as image-bearers of God — not climate liabilities, not data profiles, not replaceable hardware components.

Bill Gates can change his tune. The media can change the script. But the agenda remains the same.

They no longer want to save the planet. They want to run it, and they expect you to obey.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Why the White House restoration sent the left Into panic mode

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Presidents have altered the White House for decades, yet only Donald Trump is treated as a vandal for privately funding the East Wing’s restoration.

Every time a president so much as changes the color of the White House drapes, the press clutches its pearls. Unless the name on the stationery is Barack Obama’s, even routine restoration becomes a national outrage.

President Donald Trump’s decision to privately fund upgrades to the White House — including a new state ballroom — has been met with the usual chorus of gasps and sneers. You’d think he bulldozed Monticello.

If a Republican preserves beauty, it’s vandalism. If a Democrat does the same, it’s ‘visionary.’

The irony is that presidents have altered and expanded the White House for more than a century. President Franklin D. Roosevelt added the East and West Wings in the middle of the Great Depression. Newspapers accused him of building a palace while Americans stood in breadlines. History now calls it “vision.”

First lady Nancy Reagan faced the same hysteria. Headlines accused her of spending taxpayer money on new china “while Americans starved.” In truth, she raised private funds after learning that the White House didn’t have enough matching plates for state dinners. She took the ridicule and refused to pass blame.

“I’m a big girl,” she told her staff. “This comes with the job.” That was dignity — something the press no longer recognizes.

A restoration, not a renovation

Trump’s project is different in every way that should matter. It costs taxpayers nothing. Not a cent. The president and a few friends privately fund the work. There’s no private pool or tennis court, no personal perks. The additions won’t even be completed until after he leaves office.

What’s being built is not indulgence — it’s stewardship. A restoration of aging rooms, worn fixtures, and century-old bathrooms that no longer function properly in the people’s house. Trump has paid for cast brass doorknobs engraved with the presidential seal, restored the carpets and moldings, and ensured that the architecture remains faithful to history.

The media’s response was mockery and accusations of vanity. They call it “grotesque excess,” while celebrating billion-dollar “climate art” projects and funneling hundreds of millions into activist causes like the No Kings movement. They lecture America on restraint while living off the largesse of billionaires.

The selective guardians of history

Where was this sudden reverence for history when rioters torched St. John’s Church — the same church where every president since James Madison has worshipped? The press called it an “expression of grief.”

Where was that reverence when mobs toppled statues of Washington, Jefferson, and Grant? Or when first lady Melania Trump replaced the Rose Garden’s lawn with a patio but otherwise followed Jackie Kennedy’s original 1962 plans in the garden’s restoration? They called that “desecration.”

If a Republican preserves beauty, it’s vandalism. If a Democrat does the same, it’s “visionary.”

The real desecration

The people shrieking about “historic preservation” care nothing for history. They hate the idea that something lasting and beautiful might be built by hands they despise. They mock craftsmanship because it exposes their own cultural decay.

The White House ballroom is not a scandal — it’s a mirror. And what it reflects is the media’s own pettiness. The ruling class that ridicules restoration is the same class that cheered as America’s monuments fell. Its members sneer at permanence because permanence condemns them.

Julia Beverly / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump’s improvements are an act of faith — in the nation’s symbols, its endurance, and its worth. The outrage over a privately funded renovation says less about him than it does about the journalists who mistake destruction for progress.

The real desecration isn’t happening in the East Wing. It’s happening in the newsrooms that long ago tore up their own foundation — truth — and never bothered to rebuild it.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Trump’s secret war in the Caribbean EXPOSED — It’s not about drugs

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

The president’s moves in Venezuela, Guyana, and Colombia aren’t about drugs. They’re about re-establishing America’s sovereignty across the Western Hemisphere.

For decades, we’ve been told America’s wars are about drugs, democracy, or “defending freedom.” But look closer at what’s unfolding off the coast of Venezuela, and you’ll see something far more strategic taking shape. Donald Trump’s so-called drug war isn’t about fentanyl or cocaine. It’s about control — and a rebirth of American sovereignty.

The aim of Trump’s ‘drug war’ is to keep the hemisphere’s oil, minerals, and manufacturing within the Western family and out of Beijing’s hands.

The president understands something the foreign policy class forgot long ago: The world doesn’t respect apologies. It respects strength.

While the global elites in Davos tout the Great Reset, Trump is building something entirely different — a new architecture of power based on regional independence, not global dependence. His quiet campaign in the Western Hemisphere may one day be remembered as the second Monroe Doctrine.

Venezuela sits at the center of it all. It holds the world’s largest crude oil reserves — oil perfectly suited for America’s Gulf refineries. For years, China and Russia have treated Venezuela like a pawn on their chessboard, offering predatory loans in exchange for control of those resources. The result has been a corrupt, communist state sitting in our own back yard. For too long, Washington shrugged. Not any more.The naval exercises in the Caribbean, the sanctions, the patrols — they’re not about drug smugglers. They’re about evicting China from our hemisphere.

Trump is using the old “drug war” playbook to wage a new kind of war — an economic and strategic one — without firing a shot at our actual enemies. The goal is simple: Keep the hemisphere’s oil, minerals, and manufacturing within the Western family and out of Beijing’s hands.

Beyond Venezuela

Just east of Venezuela lies Guyana, a country most Americans couldn’t find on a map a year ago. Then ExxonMobil struck oil, and suddenly Guyana became the newest front in a quiet geopolitical contest. Washington is helping defend those offshore platforms, build radar systems, and secure undersea cables — not for charity, but for strategy. Control energy, data, and shipping lanes, and you control the future.

Moreover, Colombia — a country once defined by cartels — is now positioned as the hinge between two oceans and two continents. It guards the Panama Canal and sits atop rare-earth minerals every modern economy needs. Decades of American presence there weren’t just about cocaine interdiction; they were about maintaining leverage over the arteries of global trade. Trump sees that clearly.

PEDRO MATTEY / Contributor | Getty Images

All of these recent news items — from the military drills in the Caribbean to the trade negotiations — reflect a new vision of American power. Not global policing. Not endless nation-building. It’s about strategic sovereignty.

It’s the same philosophy driving Trump’s approach to NATO, the Middle East, and Asia. We’ll stand with you — but you’ll stand on your own two feet. The days of American taxpayers funding global security while our own borders collapse are over.

Trump’s Monroe Doctrine

Critics will call it “isolationism.” It isn’t. It’s realism. It’s recognizing that America’s strength comes not from fighting other people’s wars but from securing our own energy, our own supply lines, our own hemisphere. The first Monroe Doctrine warned foreign powers to stay out of the Americas. The second one — Trump’s — says we’ll defend them, but we’ll no longer be their bank or their babysitter.

Historians may one day mark this moment as the start of a new era — when America stopped apologizing for its own interests and started rebuilding its sovereignty, one barrel, one chip, and one border at a time.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.