Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Alex Jones Watch: Children Are Being Kidnapped and Sent to a Secret Colony On Mars

July 05, 2017
Staff

WRITER

A story that very well could be the biggest story in human history broke last week and was reported on by Alex Jones on his show. Wednesday on radio, Glenn and the guys put on their tinfoil hats as they followed Jones down the rabbit hole and broke down the shocking claims.

Jones' guest had this to say:

This may strike your listeners as way out, but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride. So that once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

Alex Jones is no stranger to controversy, but this claim seemed to force even him to recognize the absurdity. He did, however, provide some cover for his guest and add a little spin:

Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. You know, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on. But I know this, we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars. And people say, oh, look, it looks like, you know, mechanics. They go, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening. Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

This one might be kind of hard to prove, but the story did answer some questions for Glenn on another Alex Jones conspiracy.

"That's why they didn't find any children in the pizza place," Glenn said. "They've just been shipped to Mars."

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

PAT: Speaking of aliens, you want to hear about a real frightening alien story that I notice you're avoiding all day. All day he's avoiding the biggest alien story of the day, of the week. Perhaps one of the bigger stories in human history.

JEFFY: Hasn't even mentioned it.

STU: Perhaps!

GLENN: All right. Just give it --

PAT: That was a silly statement.

STU: It was.

PAT: Quite obviously the biggest story in human history.

JEFFY: It's embarrassing you wouldn't even mention it.

GLENN: Just give it to me. Just give it to me.

PAT: This broke the other day. I can't take credit for this. We did not break this. This was broken by Alex Jones on his show, I believe, last week.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out, but we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride.

GLENN: Okay.

VOICE: So that once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

GLENN: Wow.

PAT: Wow.

ALEX: Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea, there's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. You know, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on.

But I know this, we see a bunch of mechanical wreckage on Mars. And people say, oh, look, it looks like, you know, mechanics. They go, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening. Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

PAT: The child sex slave industry in Mars.

STU: What the hell was that clip --

PAT: I mean, why are we not talking about this? Why is something not being done? These children -- well, they're not children by the time they get there, granted. Okay.

GLENN: It's like a six months' trip to Mars.

PAT: I know. Why is it 20 years? Are they traveling --

GLENN: They may be using an old VanoLiner.

STU: Oh, okay. Yeah.

PAT: On the Chevy Astro van.

GLENN: The Chevy Astro van.

PAT: Top speed, about 40 miles an hour.

GLENN: Yeah. Scooby-Doo. They were using the -- it was twenty years. They got the --

PAT: Twenty-year trip.

GLENN: What was it? The Mystery Machine. Yeah, but what kind of van was it? Not the new one. Not the new one --

JEFFY: No, those were those Handi-Vans.

GLENN: Yes.

JEFFY: Those little Chevy Handi-Vans with the wheel up front.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Yeah, I see you driving a white one around some neighborhoods sometimes.

JEFFY: Sell ice cream. Got to make some extra money somewhere. What are you talking about?

PAT: Just a little ice cream. Nothing wrong with that.

(laughter)

STU: That is a --

GLENN: Don't come around my house. I'll buy you out of ice cream every time you're in my neighborhood, brother.

STU: Wait. Can we discuss his actual point there? Because, first of all, you can see Alex Jones actually senses the media is going to make fun of him on this one.

PAT: Well, yeah.

STU: He's like, well, the media is going to jump all over this one. But his instinct is to still defend the guy.

PAT: Let me tell you something, NASA, about 90 percent of their missions are secret. Really?

JEFFY: I've been told by high-level NASA engineers, there's a lot going on.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Hang on just a second. You don't even need to get to Alex Jones. You really don't. Just play it again. I'll tell you where to stop.

STU: Really?

PAT: All right.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out.

PAT: No.

VOICE: But we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars --

PAT: Colony on Mars.

VOICE: -- that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: Why even go to Alex Jones?

PAT: I know.

GLENN: I mean, this is enough to feast on for a week.

STU: Well -- it is.

PAT: It is.

STU: Because, you're right. First of all, they were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year journey. First of all, they don't seem to actually be there yet.

GLENN: Who kidnapped?

PAT: Yeah. Who kidnapped them? I guess NASA.

STU: I guess NASA.

So they were kidnapped, they were sent into space on a 20-year mission. Although, he said there is a colony on Mars already. So -- but they don't seem to be there. He doesn't seem to have that down.

GLENN: Well, no. They are there. Because they're forced -- there's no way back. So they're forced to be slaves.

JEFFY: A twenty-year journey.

GLENN: But what are they doing -- what are they building on Mars?

STU: But listen to his wording, he's saying there is a colony on Mars.

PAT: Yes. But it's the colony of child sex slaves. Is it not?

STU: First of all, if they're there by themselves, who is enslaving them. Right? You would need someone to enslave them. And if they're 20-year-olds --

GLENN: Right. And why would they be sex slaves? Why do you just assume this is a sex planet?

PAT: They have no other choice, but --

STU: You somehow turned this story weird. How did you do that?

GLENN: Why does he always go to the darkest places?

STU: But listen to this.

PAT: Listen to this.

VOICE: This may strike your listeners as way out.

PAT: No. Come on now.

VOICE: But we actually believe that there is a colony on Mars.

STU: Colony on Mars.

PAT: Okay. There is a colony on Mars.

STU: Okay. So it's there, right?

VOICE: It is populated by children who were kidnapped.

PAT: Populated by children who were kidnapped.

STU: Who were kidnapped.

VOICE: And sent to space on a 20-year ride.

STU: Okay. Twenty-year ride.

VOICE: So once they get to Mars, they have no alternative, but to be slaves on the Mars colony.

PAT: No alternative. Okay. They have no alternatives but to be slaves.

JEFFY: I mean, no matter what planet they land on, they have no alternative.

GLENN: Yeah, look. Hang on just a second, you land on a planet, there's no food, there's no water, there's nothing. And they're like, use those shovels and make a big house for me because I'm coming at some point. You might kill the guy with a shovel, but as long as he's sending you food and water, yes, you're going to build him whatever he tells you to build.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: Because there's no --

PAT: That's probably true. Unless you have the smarts of, say, Matt Damon and you know how to make potatoes out of your own poop.

JEFFY: Bingo, my friend.

PAT: Why then, maybe you take a chance.

GLENN: And here's the problem. Here's the problem: They went up 17 years before that movie was made. They don't have any idea.

PAT: Yeah, right.

STU: That's true. Now, wait. You're exonerating Alex Jones' point here.

JEFFY: I know.

STU: Because he says -- okay. I know. First of all, he says, I know the media is going to mock this. But then he defends it anyway and tries to figure out a way that it could theoretically be true. Then he makes one of the most amazing odd guttural noises I've ever heard in my life. (sound effect).

(laughter)

But then he says, A, there's lots of wreckage on Mars. It looks like there's mechanics there.

GLENN: Mechanics. Fixing the Astro van! Fixing the Astro van.

JEFFY: Right.

PAT: Yep.

STU: Listen to this one more time. We have to listen to this one more time.

PAT: Do you want to start with Alex?

STU: I think from here is fine. Yeah.

PAT: All right.

VOICE: Now, there's all kind of --

ALEX: Look, I know 90 percent of the NASA missions are secret, and I've been told by high-level NASA engineers that you have no idea. There's so much stuff going on. But then it goes off into all that. I mean, that's the kind of thing the media jumps on.

But I know this, we see a bunch of (sound effect), mechanical wreckage --

PAT: We see a bunch of (sound effect).

STU: We got to isolate that.

PAT: We see a lot of that. A lot of (sound effect). You know, I see a lot of (sound effect).

GLENN: What is it about Alex Jones that entertains you two for hours? You guys could listen to him for hours.

JEFFY: Oh.

PAT: I could. I could. We could do just a whole show just on his segments. For sure.

STU: We didn't even get to the mechanic part yet.

PAT: Right. Here's (sound effect).

ALEX: And people say, oh, look, it looks like mechanics. They go, oh, your a conspiracy theorist. Clearly, they don't want us looking into what's happening.

Every time probes go over, they turn them off.

JEFFY: Clearly.

STU: What?

PAT: What?

GLENN: Guys, where do you think -- where do you think all those Chevy Volts went? The government --

PAT: On a slow flight to Mars.

GLENN: Yes. There's no oxygen there. Fire -- what happens to fire with no oxygen? It can't burn. It's the only place the Chevy Volt is safe.

JEFFY: And I will say, as -- as you would expect, NASA has denied that it's running a child slave colony on --

PAT: Those bastards.

STU: Well, of course they're going to say that.

PAT: What are they going to say?

GLENN: That's why they didn't find any children in the pizza place.

PAT: They're all on Mars.

GLENN: They've just been shipped to Mars.

STU: The tunnels go to Mars.

POLL: Starbase exposed: Musk’s vision or corporate takeover?

MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor | Getty Images

Is Starbase the future of innovation or a step too far?

Elon Musk’s ambitious Starbase project in South Texas is reshaping Boca Chica into a cutting-edge hub for SpaceX’s Starship program, promising thousands of jobs and a leap toward Mars colonization. Supporters see Musk as a visionary, driving economic growth and innovation in a historically underserved region. However, local critics, including Brownsville residents and activists, argue that SpaceX’s presence raises rents, restricts beach access, and threatens environmental harm, with Starbase’s potential incorporation as a city sparking fears of unchecked corporate control. As pro-Musk advocates clash with anti-Musk skeptics, will Starbase unite the community or deepen the divide?

Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Is Starbase’s development a big win for South Texas?  

Should Starbase become its own city?  

Is Elon Musk’s vision more of a benefit than a burden for the region?

Shocking truth behind Trump-Zelenskyy mineral deal unveiled

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have finalized a landmark agreement that will shape the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations. The agreement focuses on mineral access and war recovery.

After a tense March meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy signed a deal on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, granting the U.S. preferential mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for continued military support. Glenn analyzed an earlier version of the agreement in March, when Zelenskyy rejected it, highlighting its potential benefits for America, Ukraine, and Europe. Glenn praised the deal’s strategic alignment with U.S. interests, including reducing reliance on China for critical minerals and fostering regional peace.

However, the agreement signed this week differs from the March proposal Glenn praised. Negotiations led to significant revisions, reflecting compromises on both sides. What changes were made? What did each leader seek, and what did they achieve? How will this deal impact the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations and global geopolitics? Below, we break down the key aspects of the agreement.

What did Trump want?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump aimed to curb what many perceive as Ukraine’s overreliance on U.S. aid while securing strategic advantages for America. His primary goals included obtaining reimbursement for the billions in military aid provided to Ukraine, gaining exclusive access to Ukraine’s valuable minerals (such as titanium, uranium, and lithium), and reducing Western dependence on China for critical resources. These minerals are essential for aerospace, energy, and technology sectors, and Trump saw their acquisition as a way to bolster U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. Additionally, he sought to advance peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, positioning the U.S. as a key mediator.

Ultimately, Trump secured preferential—but not exclusive—rights to extract Ukraine’s minerals through the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, as outlined in the agreement. The U.S. will not receive reimbursement for past aid, but future military contributions will count toward the joint fund, designed to support Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Zelenskyy’s commitment to peace negotiations under U.S. leadership aligns with Trump’s goal of resolving the conflict, giving him leverage in discussions with Russia.

These outcomes partially meet Trump’s objectives. The preferential mineral rights strengthen U.S. access to critical resources, but the lack of exclusivity and reimbursement limits the deal’s financial benefits. The peace commitment, however, positions Trump as a central figure in shaping the war’s resolution, potentially enhancing his diplomatic influence.

What did Zelenskyy want?

Global Images Ukraine / Contributor | Getty Images

Zelenskyy sought to sustain U.S. military and economic support without the burden of repaying past aid, which has been critical for Ukraine’s defense against Russia. He also prioritized reconstruction funds to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn economy and infrastructure. Security guarantees from the U.S. to deter future Russian aggression were a key demand, though controversial, as they risked entangling America in long-term commitments. Additionally, Zelenskyy aimed to retain control over Ukraine’s mineral wealth to safeguard national sovereignty and align with the country’s European Union membership aspirations.

The final deal delivered several of Zelenskyy’s priorities. The reconstruction fund, supported by future U.S. aid, provides a financial lifeline for Ukraine’s recovery without requiring repayment of past assistance. Ukraine retained ownership of its subsoil and decision-making authority over mineral extraction, granting only preferential access to the U.S. However, Zelenskyy conceded on security guarantees, a significant compromise, and agreed to pursue peace talks under Trump’s leadership, which may involve territorial or political concessions to Russia.

Zelenskyy’s outcomes reflect a delicate balance. The reconstruction fund and retained mineral control bolster Ukraine’s economic and sovereign interests, but the absence of security guarantees and pressure to negotiate peace could strain domestic support and challenge Ukraine’s long-term stability.

What does this mean for the future?

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

While Trump didn’t secure all his demands, the deal advances several of his broader strategic goals. By gaining access to Ukraine’s mineral riches, the U.S. undermines China’s dominance over critical elements like lithium and graphite, essential for technology and energy industries. This shift reduces American and European dependence on Chinese supply chains, strengthening Western industrial and tech sectors. Most significantly, the agreement marks a pivotal step toward peace in Europe. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which has claimed thousands of lives, is a top priority for Trump, and Zelenskyy’s commitment to U.S.-led peace talks enhances Trump’s leverage in negotiations with Russia. Notably, the deal avoids binding U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s long-term defense, preserving flexibility for future administrations.

The deal’s broader implications align with the vision Glenn outlined in March, when he praised its potential to benefit America, Ukraine, and Europe by securing resources and creating peace. While the final agreement differs from Glenn's hopes, it still achieves key goals he outlined.

Did Trump's '51st state' jab just cost Canada its independence?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Canadians just vote in their doom?

On April 28, 2025, Canada held its federal election, and what began as a promising conservative revival ended in a Liberal Party regroup, fueled by an anti-Trump narrative. This outcome is troubling for Canada, as Glenn revealed when he exposed the globalist tendencies of the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney. On a recent episode of his podcast, Glenn hosted former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who provided insight into Carney’s history. She revealed that, as governor of the Bank of England, Carney contributed to the 2022 pension crisis through policies that triggered excessive money printing, leading to rampant inflation.

Carney’s election and the Liberal Party’s fourth consecutive victory spell trouble for a Canada already straining under globalist policies. Many believed Canadians were fed up with the progressive agenda when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned amid plummeting public approval. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, started 2025 with a 25-point lead over his Liberal rivals, fueling optimism about his inevitable victory.

So, what went wrong? How did Poilievre go from predicted Prime Minister to losing his own parliamentary seat? And what details of this election could cost Canada dearly?

A Costly Election

Mark Carney (left) and Pierre Poilievre (right)

GEOFF ROBINSPETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

The election defied the expectations of many analysts who anticipated a Conservative win earlier this year.

For Americans unfamiliar with parliamentary systems, here’s a brief overview of Canada’s federal election process. Unlike U.S. presidential elections, Canadians do not directly vote for their Prime Minister. Instead, they vote for a political party. Each Canadian resides in a "riding," similar to a U.S. congressional district, and during the election, each riding elects a Member of Parliament (MP). The party that secures the majority of MPs forms the government and appoints its leader as Prime Minister.

At the time of writing, the Liberal Party has secured 169 of the 172 seats needed for a majority, all but ensuring their victory. In contrast, the Conservative Party holds 144 seats, indicating that the Liberal Party will win by a solid margin, which will make passing legislation easier. This outcome is a far cry from the landslide Conservative victory many had anticipated.

Poilievre's Downfall

PETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

What caused Poilievre’s dramatic fall from front-runner to losing his parliamentary seat?

Despite his surge in popularity earlier this year, which coincided with enthusiasm surrounding Trump’s inauguration, many attribute the Conservative loss to Trump’s influence. Commentators argue that Trump’s repeated references to Canada as the "51st state" gave Liberals a rallying cry: Canadian sovereignty. The Liberal Party framed a vote for Poilievre as a vote to surrender Canada to U.S. influence, positioning Carney as the defender of national independence.

Others argue that Poilievre’s lackluster campaign was to blame. Critics suggest he should have embraced a Trump-style, Canada-first message, emphasizing a balanced relationship with the U.S. rather than distancing himself from Trump’s annexation remarks. By failing to counter the Liberal narrative effectively, Poilievre lost momentum and voter confidence.

This election marks a pivotal moment for Canada, with far-reaching implications for its sovereignty and economic stability. As Glenn has warned, Carney’s globalist leanings could align Canada more closely with international agendas, potentially at the expense of its national interests. Canadians now face the challenge of navigating this new political landscape under a leader with a controversial track record.

Top FIVE takeaways from Glenn's EXCLUSIVE interview with Trump

Image courtesy of the White House

As President Trump approaches his 100th day in office, Glenn Beck joined him to evaluate his administration’s progress with a gripping new interview. April 30th is President Trump's 100th day in office, and what an eventful few months it has been. To commemorate this milestone, Glenn Beck was invited to the White House for an exclusive interview with the President.

Their conversation covered critical topics, including the border crisis, DOGE updates, the revival of the U.S. energy sector, AI advancements, and more. Trump remains energized, acutely aware of the nation’s challenges, and determined to address them.

Here are the top five takeaways from Glenn Beck’s one-on-one with President Trump:

Border Security and Cartels

DAVID SWANSON / Contributor | Getty Images

Early in the interview, Glenn asked if Trump views Mexico as a failed narco-state. While Trump avoided the term, he acknowledged that cartels effectively control Mexico. He noted that while not all Mexican officials are corrupt, those who are honest fear severe repercussions for opposing the cartels.

Trump was unsurprised when Glenn cited evidence that cartels are using Pentagon-supplied weapons intended for the Mexican military. He is also aware of the fentanyl influx from China through Mexico and is committed to stopping the torrent of the dangerous narcotic. Trump revealed that he has offered military aid to Mexico to combat the cartels, but these offers have been repeatedly declined. While significant progress has been made in securing the border, Trump emphasized that more must be done.

American Energy Revival

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump’s tariffs are driving jobs back to America, with the AI sector showing immense growth potential. He explained that future AI systems require massive, costly complexes with significant electricity demands. China is outpacing the U.S. in building power plants to support AI development, threatening America’s technological leadership.

To counter this, Trump is cutting bureaucratic red tape, allowing AI companies to construct their own power plants, potentially including nuclear facilities, to meet the energy needs of AI server farms. Glenn was thrilled to learn these plants could also serve as utilities, supplying excess power to homes and businesses. Trump is determined to ensure America remains the global leader in AI and energy.

Liberation Day Shakeup

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

Glenn drew a parallel between Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs and the historical post-World War II Liberation Day. Trump confirmed the analogy, explaining that his policy aims to dismantle an outdated global economic order established to rebuild Europe and Asia after the wars of the 20th century. While beneficial decades ago, this system now disadvantages the U.S. through job outsourcing, unfair trade deals, and disproportionate NATO contributions.

Trump stressed that America’s economic survival is at stake. Without swift action, the U.S. risks collapse, potentially dragging the West down with it. He views his presidency as a critical opportunity to reverse this decline.

Trouble in Europe

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

When Glenn pressed Trump on his tariff strategy and negotiations with Europe, Trump delivered a powerful statement: “I don’t have to negotiate.” Despite America’s challenges, it remains the world’s leading economy with the wealthiest consumer base, making it an indispensable trading partner for Europe. Trump wants to make equitable deals and is willing to negotiate with European leaders out of respect and desire for shared prosperity, he knows that they are dependent on U.S. dollars to keep the lights on.

Trump makes an analogy, comparing America to a big store. If Europe wants to shop at the store, they are going to have to pay an honest price. Or go home empty-handed.

Need for Peace

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

Trump emphasized the need to end America’s involvement in endless wars, which have cost countless lives and billions of dollars without a clear purpose. He highlighted the staggering losses in Ukraine, where thousands of soldiers die weekly. Trump is committed to ending the conflict but noted that Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has been a challenging partner, constantly demanding more U.S. support.

The ongoing wars in Europe and the Middle East are unsustainable, and America’s excessive involvement has prolonged these conflicts, leading to further casualties. Trump aims to extricate the U.S. from these entanglements.