Should We Really Be Sharing Our Kids’ Lives on Social Media?

A schoolkid who was upset about being bullied poured out his feelings in an emotional video that went viral after his mom uploaded it to YouTube earlier this month. Celebrities rallied around Keaton Jones, the bullied middle school student. But isn’t there a dark side to exposing your kid’s private life to the entire world?

“I can’t imagine a kid in his darkest moment crying his eyes out and posting that on YouTube,” Stu said when he and Glenn talked about the video. “I can’t even imagine pointing the camera at my kid and saying, ‘Hey, something really terrible happened to you. Tell the world.'”

Glenn did have to point out that Stu is just a private person in general: “You are the exact opposite of me.”

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

GLENN: Welcome to the program. Glad you're here.

The video from Keaton Jones, you can find it at TheBlaze.com. It's the top story today at TheBlaze. It's this cute kid that is -- you know, got in the car with his mom. And he asked his mom to make this video.

And it was after he had been bullied. And he wanted to ask everybody, why? Why do you think this is okay?

STU: One of my specialties as a broadcaster is to attempt to ruin positive moments in America and take them to a negative place.

GLENN: Well, I like to take people to a darker place. You just take them to a negative place.

STU: My initial reaction to this -- because we all know the basic thing here. The basic truth is, you should never bully somebody. And it's obviously terrible. And nobody deserves this. We all understand that.

So this is why I kind of skip past it a little bit. Because you're just telling me something that everybody on earth understands and I think knows.

We all know that every one of -- I'm sure, obviously -- you were surely a victim of bullying when you were in school.

GLENN: I was actually.

STU: Obviously.

GLENN: You know what's sad is, it's never stopped. It's just never stopped.

STU: True. I'm sorry about that.

But, I mean, everybody saw that in school. Most people were either involved in it one way or another, on either side. It's obviously a terrible thing. It's not new. It's been going on forever. And there are really bad cases where terrible things happened. And it is something that we have to focus on. And all of these things are saying -- I'm saying every single person on earth already knows.

So this is why I skip past it. As a parent, as a person who is a parent and has kids who have just entered school -- and these things are hitting me for the first time. I look at things through that lens often. I can't imagine -- I can't imagine a kid in his darkest moment crying his eyes out and posting that on YouTube. I can't even imagine pointing a camera at my kid and saying, hey, something really terrible happened to you. Tell -- tell the world about how awful it was and the emotional state you're currently in. And then posting it on the internet.

And, yes, this one -- this one winds up being that probably George Clooney will have him over for tea and crumpets at some point in the next few weeks, and it will work out wonderfully.

GLENN: Right. Right.

STU: However, there's going to be 1,000 other kids whose parents think the same thing, that they'll get some celebrity reaction out of this.

GLENN: Well, I don't think that's what the parent was thinking. The child said, Mom, please, post this.

STU: I hope not.

Children in really tough emotional states don't always make the sane choice.

GLENN: No, I agree. I agree.

STU: And, again, I'm not judging this particular family at all, we're just learning about this.

GLENN: It sounded like it.

STU: But just thinking about how I would handle this as a parent, I would be --

GLENN: You're the most private. You are the exact opposite of me.

You couldn't -- I couldn't be more open.

STU: Yes, no, it's true.

GLENN: Just, there's no secrets.

STU: We'd like things to close up.

GLENN: There's no secrets. You and I are the exact opposite. You know, things will happen. Lisa will leave you. She had leprosy. And your house burned down. And we'll find out about three years later. We'll be like, wait. Why haven't we seen Lisa? Oh, well, she left me, and she got leprosy.

STU: 2014 was a dramatic year, I will say.

GLENN: Yeah. You are the most private person I think I've ever met.

STU: That's definitely not true.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

STU: I will say --

GLENN: Yes, it is. It is.

STU: It is not. Not at all.

GLENN: It is. It is.

STU: What are you talking about? We talk about our lives all the time.

GLENN: It is.

No, you do not. No, you do not.

STU: You're just not interested in the things I talk about.

GLENN: No, that is not true.

STU: It is true.

GLENN: It is not true.

STU: It is true.

GLENN: No.

STU: But the point here is that, it's not about you and whether you want to be private or not.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: Putting your kid in a -- like think about the typical person this happens to.

George Clooney doesn't call everybody, right? Donald Trump Jr. is offering to take this kid on a tour of the UFC facilities. Right?

All these things are happening to this kid. And this kid is going to have an amazing next couple weeks when the celebrity culture decides bullying is bad and takes a big step in that direction and helps him. The next hundred kids that post their video of their emotional tragedies so that every other kid in their school will watch it on repeat for the next six months, it may not be such a happy story. It may actually make things much, much, much worse for those kids. So maybe I'm a worst-case scenario person on this type of thing.

GLENN: No, you're just a very private thing who would not -- Stu, let me ask the audience this.

You're friends with somebody for ten years. You're good friends with them for ten years. Okay?

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: And let's say they lose their ability to taste anything. Anything!

They can't taste. Their tongue no longer works. And it goes on for like four months. And the friends find out because they're sitting in a Ruth's Chris one time, having a celebration over something, and his friend, let's just call him hypothetically me, sitting next to him, and he's whispering to the waiter, well, do you have anything with more texture? More of a crunchy texture?

I don't know. Like, what do you mean?

Like, I don't know. How is your corn? Is it really soft, or is it really crunchy?

The guy leaves, and I look at Stu, and I said, that's the weirdest way I've ever heard anybody order. What are you doing?

He's like, well, I can't really taste anything.

What!

STU: I did go through a several month --

GLENN: Several months without telling anyone. That's weird. That's weird.

STU: That's not weird. You know what's weird? Let me give you an example of what's weird, a YouTube video that you might post about a particular ailment you're having, which may or may not have to do with the part of your body that does not necessarily need to be discussed that is enflamed. And maybe you post --

GLENN: It wasn't enflamed. They almost killed me. They almost killed me. They drugged me so much in surgery.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: That they almost killed me.

STU: And what was your answer to that? To go on YouTube on video to explain your hemorrhoid surgery.

GLENN: To share it. I didn't explain the hemorrhoid surgery.

STU: Yes, you did. And this was not once. This was like 50 times. The difference -- we are at the opposite ends of this spectrum, at least when it comes to medical ailments. You tell me about every medical ailment you have.

GLENN: No, that's a problem.

But you, you are --

STU: I try not to bother people with my medical ailments.

GLENN: You will be seriously -- you left last year at some point, and Jeffy and Pat and I, we honestly had this conversation. Do you think he has cancer? I mean, what -- what's happening?

STU: Why?

GLENN: Because you went through this period where you wouldn't talk to us about anything. You were like, yeah, I've got a doctor's appointment. What is it about?

You know, I don't want to talk about --

STU: Why would you -- why would you want to know --

GLENN: Because your friends care.

STU: You don't care.

GLENN: Well, I said your friends care.

STU: Okay.

(chuckling)

STU: With that clarification, I guess, that's probably true.

Silent genocide exposed: Are christians being wiped out in 2025?

Aldara Zarraoa / Contributor | Getty Images

Is a Christian Genocide unfolding overseas?

Recent reports suggest an alarming escalation in violence against Christians, raising questions about whether these acts constitute genocide under international law. Recently, Glenn hosted former U.S. Army Special Forces Sniper Tim Kennedy, who discussed a predictive model that forecasts a surge in global Christian persecution for the summer of 2025.

From Africa to Asia and the Middle East, extreme actions—some described as genocidal—have intensified over the past year. Over 380 million Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution, a number that continues to climb. With rising international concern, the United Nations and human rights groups are urging protective measures by the global community. Is a Christian genocide being waged in the far corners of the globe? Where are they taking place, and what is being done?

India: Hindu Extremist Violence Escalates

Yawar Nazir / Contributor | Getty Images

In India, attacks on Christians have surged as Hindu extremist groups gain influence within the country. In February 2025, Hindu nationalist leader Aadesh Soni organized a 50,000-person rally in Chhattisgarh, where he called for the rape and murder of all Christians in nearby villages and demanded the execution of Christian leaders to erase Christianity. Other incidents include forced conversions, such as a June 2024 attack in Chhattisgarh, where a Hindu mob gave Christian families a 10-day ultimatum to convert to Hinduism. In December 2024, a Christian man in Uttar Pradesh was attacked, forcibly converted, and paraded while the mob chanted "Death to Jesus."

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommends designating India a "Country of Particular Concern" and imposing targeted sanctions on those perpetrating these attacks. The international community is increasingly alarmed by the rising tide of religious violence in India.

Syria: Sectarian Violence Post-Regime Change

LOUAI BESHARA / Contributor | Getty Images

Following the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, Syria has seen a wave of sectarian violence targeting religious minorities, including Christians, with over 1,000 killed in early 2025. It remains unclear whether Christians are deliberately targeted or caught in broader conflicts, but many fear persecution by the new regime or extremist groups. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a dominant rebel group and known al-Qaeda splinter group now in power, is known for anti-Christian sentiments, heightening fears of increased persecution.

Christians, especially converts from Islam, face severe risks in the unstable post-regime environment. The international community is calling for humanitarian aid and protection for Syria’s vulnerable minority communities.

Democratic Republic of Congo: A "Silent Genocide"

Hugh Kinsella Cunningham / Stringer | Getty Images

In February 2025, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS-affiliated group, beheaded 70 Christians—men, women, and children—in a Protestant church in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, after tying their hands. This horrific massacre, described as a "silent genocide" reminiscent of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, has shocked the global community.

Since 1996, the ADF and other militias have killed over six million people, with Christians frequently targeted. A Christmas 2024 attack killed 46, further decimating churches in the region. With violence escalating, humanitarian organizations are urging immediate international intervention to address the crisis.

POLL: Starbase exposed: Musk’s vision or corporate takeover?

MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor | Getty Images

Is Starbase the future of innovation or a step too far?

Elon Musk’s ambitious Starbase project in South Texas is reshaping Boca Chica into a cutting-edge hub for SpaceX’s Starship program, promising thousands of jobs and a leap toward Mars colonization. Supporters see Musk as a visionary, driving economic growth and innovation in a historically underserved region. However, local critics, including Brownsville residents and activists, argue that SpaceX’s presence raises rents, restricts beach access, and threatens environmental harm, with Starbase’s potential incorporation as a city sparking fears of unchecked corporate control. As pro-Musk advocates clash with anti-Musk skeptics, will Starbase unite the community or deepen the divide?

Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Is Starbase’s development a big win for South Texas?  

Should Starbase become its own city?  

Is Elon Musk’s vision more of a benefit than a burden for the region?

Shocking truth behind Trump-Zelenskyy mineral deal unveiled

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have finalized a landmark agreement that will shape the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations. The agreement focuses on mineral access and war recovery.

After a tense March meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy signed a deal on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, granting the U.S. preferential mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for continued military support. Glenn analyzed an earlier version of the agreement in March, when Zelenskyy rejected it, highlighting its potential benefits for America, Ukraine, and Europe. Glenn praised the deal’s strategic alignment with U.S. interests, including reducing reliance on China for critical minerals and fostering regional peace.

However, the agreement signed this week differs from the March proposal Glenn praised. Negotiations led to significant revisions, reflecting compromises on both sides. What changes were made? What did each leader seek, and what did they achieve? How will this deal impact the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations and global geopolitics? Below, we break down the key aspects of the agreement.

What did Trump want?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump aimed to curb what many perceive as Ukraine’s overreliance on U.S. aid while securing strategic advantages for America. His primary goals included obtaining reimbursement for the billions in military aid provided to Ukraine, gaining exclusive access to Ukraine’s valuable minerals (such as titanium, uranium, and lithium), and reducing Western dependence on China for critical resources. These minerals are essential for aerospace, energy, and technology sectors, and Trump saw their acquisition as a way to bolster U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. Additionally, he sought to advance peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, positioning the U.S. as a key mediator.

Ultimately, Trump secured preferential—but not exclusive—rights to extract Ukraine’s minerals through the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, as outlined in the agreement. The U.S. will not receive reimbursement for past aid, but future military contributions will count toward the joint fund, designed to support Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Zelenskyy’s commitment to peace negotiations under U.S. leadership aligns with Trump’s goal of resolving the conflict, giving him leverage in discussions with Russia.

These outcomes partially meet Trump’s objectives. The preferential mineral rights strengthen U.S. access to critical resources, but the lack of exclusivity and reimbursement limits the deal’s financial benefits. The peace commitment, however, positions Trump as a central figure in shaping the war’s resolution, potentially enhancing his diplomatic influence.

What did Zelenskyy want?

Global Images Ukraine / Contributor | Getty Images

Zelenskyy sought to sustain U.S. military and economic support without the burden of repaying past aid, which has been critical for Ukraine’s defense against Russia. He also prioritized reconstruction funds to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn economy and infrastructure. Security guarantees from the U.S. to deter future Russian aggression were a key demand, though controversial, as they risked entangling America in long-term commitments. Additionally, Zelenskyy aimed to retain control over Ukraine’s mineral wealth to safeguard national sovereignty and align with the country’s European Union membership aspirations.

The final deal delivered several of Zelenskyy’s priorities. The reconstruction fund, supported by future U.S. aid, provides a financial lifeline for Ukraine’s recovery without requiring repayment of past assistance. Ukraine retained ownership of its subsoil and decision-making authority over mineral extraction, granting only preferential access to the U.S. However, Zelenskyy conceded on security guarantees, a significant compromise, and agreed to pursue peace talks under Trump’s leadership, which may involve territorial or political concessions to Russia.

Zelenskyy’s outcomes reflect a delicate balance. The reconstruction fund and retained mineral control bolster Ukraine’s economic and sovereign interests, but the absence of security guarantees and pressure to negotiate peace could strain domestic support and challenge Ukraine’s long-term stability.

What does this mean for the future?

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

While Trump didn’t secure all his demands, the deal advances several of his broader strategic goals. By gaining access to Ukraine’s mineral riches, the U.S. undermines China’s dominance over critical elements like lithium and graphite, essential for technology and energy industries. This shift reduces American and European dependence on Chinese supply chains, strengthening Western industrial and tech sectors. Most significantly, the agreement marks a pivotal step toward peace in Europe. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which has claimed thousands of lives, is a top priority for Trump, and Zelenskyy’s commitment to U.S.-led peace talks enhances Trump’s leverage in negotiations with Russia. Notably, the deal avoids binding U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s long-term defense, preserving flexibility for future administrations.

The deal’s broader implications align with the vision Glenn outlined in March, when he praised its potential to benefit America, Ukraine, and Europe by securing resources and creating peace. While the final agreement differs from Glenn's hopes, it still achieves key goals he outlined.

Did Trump's '51st state' jab just cost Canada its independence?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Canadians just vote in their doom?

On April 28, 2025, Canada held its federal election, and what began as a promising conservative revival ended in a Liberal Party regroup, fueled by an anti-Trump narrative. This outcome is troubling for Canada, as Glenn revealed when he exposed the globalist tendencies of the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney. On a recent episode of his podcast, Glenn hosted former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who provided insight into Carney’s history. She revealed that, as governor of the Bank of England, Carney contributed to the 2022 pension crisis through policies that triggered excessive money printing, leading to rampant inflation.

Carney’s election and the Liberal Party’s fourth consecutive victory spell trouble for a Canada already straining under globalist policies. Many believed Canadians were fed up with the progressive agenda when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned amid plummeting public approval. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, started 2025 with a 25-point lead over his Liberal rivals, fueling optimism about his inevitable victory.

So, what went wrong? How did Poilievre go from predicted Prime Minister to losing his own parliamentary seat? And what details of this election could cost Canada dearly?

A Costly Election

Mark Carney (left) and Pierre Poilievre (right)

GEOFF ROBINSPETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

The election defied the expectations of many analysts who anticipated a Conservative win earlier this year.

For Americans unfamiliar with parliamentary systems, here’s a brief overview of Canada’s federal election process. Unlike U.S. presidential elections, Canadians do not directly vote for their Prime Minister. Instead, they vote for a political party. Each Canadian resides in a "riding," similar to a U.S. congressional district, and during the election, each riding elects a Member of Parliament (MP). The party that secures the majority of MPs forms the government and appoints its leader as Prime Minister.

At the time of writing, the Liberal Party has secured 169 of the 172 seats needed for a majority, all but ensuring their victory. In contrast, the Conservative Party holds 144 seats, indicating that the Liberal Party will win by a solid margin, which will make passing legislation easier. This outcome is a far cry from the landslide Conservative victory many had anticipated.

Poilievre's Downfall

PETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

What caused Poilievre’s dramatic fall from front-runner to losing his parliamentary seat?

Despite his surge in popularity earlier this year, which coincided with enthusiasm surrounding Trump’s inauguration, many attribute the Conservative loss to Trump’s influence. Commentators argue that Trump’s repeated references to Canada as the "51st state" gave Liberals a rallying cry: Canadian sovereignty. The Liberal Party framed a vote for Poilievre as a vote to surrender Canada to U.S. influence, positioning Carney as the defender of national independence.

Others argue that Poilievre’s lackluster campaign was to blame. Critics suggest he should have embraced a Trump-style, Canada-first message, emphasizing a balanced relationship with the U.S. rather than distancing himself from Trump’s annexation remarks. By failing to counter the Liberal narrative effectively, Poilievre lost momentum and voter confidence.

This election marks a pivotal moment for Canada, with far-reaching implications for its sovereignty and economic stability. As Glenn has warned, Carney’s globalist leanings could align Canada more closely with international agendas, potentially at the expense of its national interests. Canadians now face the challenge of navigating this new political landscape under a leader with a controversial track record.