Finally! Witches Cast Spell to Stop Trump From Harming Rocks, Among Other Things

On Wednesday, Witchiepoos came out in force with the waning crescent moon to cast spells to “bind” President Trump “and all those who abet him.”

It sounds like something that shouldn't be taken seriously, but the situation hit Glenn like a ton of bricks.

"They were instructed to call on spirits and demons of the infernal realms to bind Trump so that his malignant works may fail utterly. They want to prevent him from harming humans, trees, animals, and, quote, rocks from harm. Now, I'm glad somebody has finally brought this up . . . the amount of rocks that this administration has harmed is untold," Glenn said.

RELATED: Witches Cast Disturbing ‘Binding’ Spells Against Trump as Part of ‘the Resistance’

Co-host Pat Gray estimated that it could be well into the millions.

"It's an untold sad, sad tale of how some rocks are pried from their family in what we haphazardly have just named gravel pits, and their family members are ripped and sent to other driveways, sometimes halfway around the country, for those rock families never to be united again," Glenn revealed.

Who is responsible for this rock travesty? Trump, Donald J. Trump, the president of the United States of America, according to the witches.

"How much gravel has he used in his life? The harm of the rock families must stop, must stop. Sometimes, he grinds stones into smaller stones. Can you imagine if somebody took your children and ground them up into smaller children? Would you be happy?" Glenn asked.

"I don't know if rocks have children or families," Pat cautioned.

"Please, Pat, stop with the denial," Glenn said.

In addition to rocks, the witches also want to prevent Trump from harming humans, trees and animals, as well as condemn those who enable Trump's wickedness. So . . . beware.

Enjoy the complimentary clip or read the transcript for details.

GLENN: Should we go into the witches that are now casting spells on Donald Trump?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Which, I don't know where to go with this story.

PAT: On Donald and all those who abet him. So it's not just Donald Trump.

GLENN: So here it is: Large Facebook group composed of self-described witches cast spells to bind President Trump and all those who abet him. On Wednesday -- you know what, that is a word I haven't really seen around since maybe 1626.

(chuckling)

On Wednesday, a large Facebook group composed of the self-described witches began to cast the spells. The group, which calls itself Bind Trump has more than 2,000 members. Although it's unclear exactly how many participated in the event, on the night of the alleged binding ceremony, dozens posted pictures and videos of their anti-Trump rituals.

We have got to see the videos.

JEFFY: They've been doing it since March.

GLENN: Can you get us the audio of that? And, Stu, could you look into a -- a -- perhaps a warlock. Wasn't Bill Rogers -- do you guys remember Bill Rogers?

STU: Oh, yeah.

GLENN: He used to be on the show a long time ago, because I believe he was some sort of a warlock, to unbind the spells tomorrow.

STU: That's an interesting -- I don't know.

JEFFY: According to the witches too, a binding spell is different than a curse or a hex. So...

GLENN: Well, you would know, Jeffy. What -- what is a binding --

JEFFY: I don't quite know the difference. I'm just saying that's what the witches have said.

GLENN: Okay. So here's -- the witches' event was scheduled to correspond with the waning crescent moon, and the group's members used an organized liturgy to wish evil on Trump's agenda. The participants were instructed to gather a number of components to aid them in their efforts, including a tarot card reader, an unflattering picture of Donald Trump. I don't know why -- why can't you use a nice picture of Donald Trump? Is the queen of all witches up in heaven going -- sorry. I don't mean to insult witches. I don't know what your practice is exactly. But are they like, "No. It's got to be an unflattering picture. This one -- this one makes me feel good." They're supposed to have candles, a small bowl of water, an ashtray, or a dish of sand, and a feather.

(chuckling)

STU: Okay.

GLENN: Now, it -- it sounds like something you shouldn't take seriously. But have I ever struck you as the guy that doesn't take stuff like this seriously? No.

PAT: No.

GLENN: No. No. They were instructed to call on spirits and demons of the infernal realms to bind Trump so that his malignant works may fail utterly. They want to prevent him from harming humans, trees, animals, and, quote, rocks from harm.

Now, I'm glad somebody has finally brought this up. But the amount of rocks that this administration has harmed is --

PAT: It's well into the millions already. Millions of rocks have been armed.

GLENN: It's untold. And it's an untold sad, sad tale of how some rocks are pried from their family in -- in what we haphazardly have just named gravel pits, and their family members are ripped and sent to other driveways, sometimes halfway around the country, for those rock families never to be united again. And who is responsible for this?

PAT: Donald Trump.

GLENN: He's a builder.

PAT: Donald Trump.

GLENN: How much gravel has he used in his life? The arm of the rock families must stop. Must stop. Sometimes, he grinds stones into smaller stones.

PAT: It's happened, yeah. It's happened.

GLENN: Can you imagine if somebody took your children and ground them up into smaller children? Would you be happy?

PAT: No, I wouldn't.

GLENN: If they took your family and ground your family up --

PAT: I don't know if rocks have children or families.

GLENN: Please, Pat. Stop with the denial. And they took and ground your children up and sprinkled them in some driveway. Your kids were what the Prius tires were driving on here in California.

PAT: I would not like it.

GLENN: No. No. You wouldn't be happy. The witches also condemn those who enable Trump's wickedness. They need to have their towers of vanity struck down.

That's the only thing -- that's the only thing that makes sense to me is strike down the towers of vanity.

Afterward, the witches were instructed, ground yourself by having a good hearty laugh. Jump up and down. Clap your hands. Stomp your feet. Have a bite to eat. Grounding is very important. Don't neglect it. And, remember, he hates people laughing at him.

PAT: According to Daniel Asor, who is a rabbi in Israel, he said people should not take these kinds of ceremonies lightly. He said, witchcraft or its real name Satanism is explicitly a power struggle, which is why it's so readily dragged into politics. Satanism, in its essence, pits the adversary against God.

JEFFY: Even if you're a good witch?

GLENN: There are no good witches. Glenda -- did you see Wicked? Glenda was not a good witch. That is a true live documentary that is happening in New York of all places. They've decided to expose the truth about that so-called good witch.

STU: What about Bewitched? Seems like a generally good witch.

GLENN: And what happened to her?

STU: I don't know.

GLENN: Dead.

STU: Is she?

GLENN: Yeah. What happened to her husband? Her first husband that we all know suddenly changed features? All of a sudden, Dagwood or Darewood or whatever his name was -- remember? All of a sudden, he was -- he looked one way, and then we were all supposed to notice. She hadn't fundamentally changed him. She killed him and replaced him. And the spell didn't work on me. I knew he was a different guy.

STU: Wow, you really do go deep. These are deep dives.

GLENN: Like I said, not a lot of people are giving you this analysis on the witch thing. I actually agree with the rabbi. I don't take this lightly at all. I mean, I don't know how many of the 2,000 people are serious. This is kind of like the -- what is it? The secret grove -- what is that place called in California?

STU: Bohemian Grove.

GLENN: Oh, yeah, Bohemian Grove. The Bohemian Grove. I don't think -- you know, I wrote about it in my book, The Eye of Moloch. And it's a fiction novel. Better than Brad Thor's, I think, quite honestly. In fact, I could do an interview about that now if you would like.

But I wrote about it in my book the Eye of Moloch. And I explained how I believe some of the stuff works. But I did it in a -- you know, a fiction sort of setting.

And, you know, the Bohemian Grove does exist. And all of these people do come from all over the world. All these high leaders. And they do apparently do this old owl thing, where they set it on fire or set a little boat on fire with that people in it. No actual little people were harmed.

And there's these little figures that they put in it. And then they, I don't know, set them on fire and throw them in the belly of the owl or something weird. I don't think anybody there takes that seriously. Maybe a couple of people. There might be, I don't know, 1,000 people there. Maybe two, really understand that that's an ancient ritual and take it seriously.

The rest are just having a party. And they're just, oh, this is funny. Oh, there's nothing to this. They don't have any intention. They don't even know what it means. They don't care. But they are performing an ancient ritual. And the same I believe with the witches.

You know, I'm not a witch hunter. I don't. You know, I'm sure there are good witches. I'm sure there are people that are just witches. They just care about the environment. And whatever witches do. They don't fly on broomsticks or any of that nonsense.

But I do believe things like this, you are performing ancient pagan rituals that I do believe do play into the adversary, do play into darkness, and I don't think we should take these things lightly. Although, I don't think Donald Trump at any point is going to be bound or -- or turn into a newt. But that's just me.

Silent genocide exposed: Are christians being wiped out in 2025?

Aldara Zarraoa / Contributor | Getty Images

Is a Christian Genocide unfolding overseas?

Recent reports suggest an alarming escalation in violence against Christians, raising questions about whether these acts constitute genocide under international law. Recently, Glenn hosted former U.S. Army Special Forces Sniper Tim Kennedy, who discussed a predictive model that forecasts a surge in global Christian persecution for the summer of 2025.

From Africa to Asia and the Middle East, extreme actions—some described as genocidal—have intensified over the past year. Over 380 million Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution, a number that continues to climb. With rising international concern, the United Nations and human rights groups are urging protective measures by the global community. Is a Christian genocide being waged in the far corners of the globe? Where are they taking place, and what is being done?

India: Hindu Extremist Violence Escalates

Yawar Nazir / Contributor | Getty Images

In India, attacks on Christians have surged as Hindu extremist groups gain influence within the country. In February 2025, Hindu nationalist leader Aadesh Soni organized a 50,000-person rally in Chhattisgarh, where he called for the rape and murder of all Christians in nearby villages and demanded the execution of Christian leaders to erase Christianity. Other incidents include forced conversions, such as a June 2024 attack in Chhattisgarh, where a Hindu mob gave Christian families a 10-day ultimatum to convert to Hinduism. In December 2024, a Christian man in Uttar Pradesh was attacked, forcibly converted, and paraded while the mob chanted "Death to Jesus."

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommends designating India a "Country of Particular Concern" and imposing targeted sanctions on those perpetrating these attacks. The international community is increasingly alarmed by the rising tide of religious violence in India.

Syria: Sectarian Violence Post-Regime Change

LOUAI BESHARA / Contributor | Getty Images

Following the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, Syria has seen a wave of sectarian violence targeting religious minorities, including Christians, with over 1,000 killed in early 2025. It remains unclear whether Christians are deliberately targeted or caught in broader conflicts, but many fear persecution by the new regime or extremist groups. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a dominant rebel group and known al-Qaeda splinter group now in power, is known for anti-Christian sentiments, heightening fears of increased persecution.

Christians, especially converts from Islam, face severe risks in the unstable post-regime environment. The international community is calling for humanitarian aid and protection for Syria’s vulnerable minority communities.

Democratic Republic of Congo: A "Silent Genocide"

Hugh Kinsella Cunningham / Stringer | Getty Images

In February 2025, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS-affiliated group, beheaded 70 Christians—men, women, and children—in a Protestant church in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, after tying their hands. This horrific massacre, described as a "silent genocide" reminiscent of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, has shocked the global community.

Since 1996, the ADF and other militias have killed over six million people, with Christians frequently targeted. A Christmas 2024 attack killed 46, further decimating churches in the region. With violence escalating, humanitarian organizations are urging immediate international intervention to address the crisis.

POLL: Starbase exposed: Musk’s vision or corporate takeover?

MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor | Getty Images

Is Starbase the future of innovation or a step too far?

Elon Musk’s ambitious Starbase project in South Texas is reshaping Boca Chica into a cutting-edge hub for SpaceX’s Starship program, promising thousands of jobs and a leap toward Mars colonization. Supporters see Musk as a visionary, driving economic growth and innovation in a historically underserved region. However, local critics, including Brownsville residents and activists, argue that SpaceX’s presence raises rents, restricts beach access, and threatens environmental harm, with Starbase’s potential incorporation as a city sparking fears of unchecked corporate control. As pro-Musk advocates clash with anti-Musk skeptics, will Starbase unite the community or deepen the divide?

Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Is Starbase’s development a big win for South Texas?  

Should Starbase become its own city?  

Is Elon Musk’s vision more of a benefit than a burden for the region?

Shocking truth behind Trump-Zelenskyy mineral deal unveiled

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have finalized a landmark agreement that will shape the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations. The agreement focuses on mineral access and war recovery.

After a tense March meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy signed a deal on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, granting the U.S. preferential mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for continued military support. Glenn analyzed an earlier version of the agreement in March, when Zelenskyy rejected it, highlighting its potential benefits for America, Ukraine, and Europe. Glenn praised the deal’s strategic alignment with U.S. interests, including reducing reliance on China for critical minerals and fostering regional peace.

However, the agreement signed this week differs from the March proposal Glenn praised. Negotiations led to significant revisions, reflecting compromises on both sides. What changes were made? What did each leader seek, and what did they achieve? How will this deal impact the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations and global geopolitics? Below, we break down the key aspects of the agreement.

What did Trump want?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump aimed to curb what many perceive as Ukraine’s overreliance on U.S. aid while securing strategic advantages for America. His primary goals included obtaining reimbursement for the billions in military aid provided to Ukraine, gaining exclusive access to Ukraine’s valuable minerals (such as titanium, uranium, and lithium), and reducing Western dependence on China for critical resources. These minerals are essential for aerospace, energy, and technology sectors, and Trump saw their acquisition as a way to bolster U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. Additionally, he sought to advance peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, positioning the U.S. as a key mediator.

Ultimately, Trump secured preferential—but not exclusive—rights to extract Ukraine’s minerals through the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, as outlined in the agreement. The U.S. will not receive reimbursement for past aid, but future military contributions will count toward the joint fund, designed to support Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Zelenskyy’s commitment to peace negotiations under U.S. leadership aligns with Trump’s goal of resolving the conflict, giving him leverage in discussions with Russia.

These outcomes partially meet Trump’s objectives. The preferential mineral rights strengthen U.S. access to critical resources, but the lack of exclusivity and reimbursement limits the deal’s financial benefits. The peace commitment, however, positions Trump as a central figure in shaping the war’s resolution, potentially enhancing his diplomatic influence.

What did Zelenskyy want?

Global Images Ukraine / Contributor | Getty Images

Zelenskyy sought to sustain U.S. military and economic support without the burden of repaying past aid, which has been critical for Ukraine’s defense against Russia. He also prioritized reconstruction funds to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn economy and infrastructure. Security guarantees from the U.S. to deter future Russian aggression were a key demand, though controversial, as they risked entangling America in long-term commitments. Additionally, Zelenskyy aimed to retain control over Ukraine’s mineral wealth to safeguard national sovereignty and align with the country’s European Union membership aspirations.

The final deal delivered several of Zelenskyy’s priorities. The reconstruction fund, supported by future U.S. aid, provides a financial lifeline for Ukraine’s recovery without requiring repayment of past assistance. Ukraine retained ownership of its subsoil and decision-making authority over mineral extraction, granting only preferential access to the U.S. However, Zelenskyy conceded on security guarantees, a significant compromise, and agreed to pursue peace talks under Trump’s leadership, which may involve territorial or political concessions to Russia.

Zelenskyy’s outcomes reflect a delicate balance. The reconstruction fund and retained mineral control bolster Ukraine’s economic and sovereign interests, but the absence of security guarantees and pressure to negotiate peace could strain domestic support and challenge Ukraine’s long-term stability.

What does this mean for the future?

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

While Trump didn’t secure all his demands, the deal advances several of his broader strategic goals. By gaining access to Ukraine’s mineral riches, the U.S. undermines China’s dominance over critical elements like lithium and graphite, essential for technology and energy industries. This shift reduces American and European dependence on Chinese supply chains, strengthening Western industrial and tech sectors. Most significantly, the agreement marks a pivotal step toward peace in Europe. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which has claimed thousands of lives, is a top priority for Trump, and Zelenskyy’s commitment to U.S.-led peace talks enhances Trump’s leverage in negotiations with Russia. Notably, the deal avoids binding U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s long-term defense, preserving flexibility for future administrations.

The deal’s broader implications align with the vision Glenn outlined in March, when he praised its potential to benefit America, Ukraine, and Europe by securing resources and creating peace. While the final agreement differs from Glenn's hopes, it still achieves key goals he outlined.

Did Trump's '51st state' jab just cost Canada its independence?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Canadians just vote in their doom?

On April 28, 2025, Canada held its federal election, and what began as a promising conservative revival ended in a Liberal Party regroup, fueled by an anti-Trump narrative. This outcome is troubling for Canada, as Glenn revealed when he exposed the globalist tendencies of the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney. On a recent episode of his podcast, Glenn hosted former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who provided insight into Carney’s history. She revealed that, as governor of the Bank of England, Carney contributed to the 2022 pension crisis through policies that triggered excessive money printing, leading to rampant inflation.

Carney’s election and the Liberal Party’s fourth consecutive victory spell trouble for a Canada already straining under globalist policies. Many believed Canadians were fed up with the progressive agenda when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned amid plummeting public approval. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, started 2025 with a 25-point lead over his Liberal rivals, fueling optimism about his inevitable victory.

So, what went wrong? How did Poilievre go from predicted Prime Minister to losing his own parliamentary seat? And what details of this election could cost Canada dearly?

A Costly Election

Mark Carney (left) and Pierre Poilievre (right)

GEOFF ROBINSPETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

The election defied the expectations of many analysts who anticipated a Conservative win earlier this year.

For Americans unfamiliar with parliamentary systems, here’s a brief overview of Canada’s federal election process. Unlike U.S. presidential elections, Canadians do not directly vote for their Prime Minister. Instead, they vote for a political party. Each Canadian resides in a "riding," similar to a U.S. congressional district, and during the election, each riding elects a Member of Parliament (MP). The party that secures the majority of MPs forms the government and appoints its leader as Prime Minister.

At the time of writing, the Liberal Party has secured 169 of the 172 seats needed for a majority, all but ensuring their victory. In contrast, the Conservative Party holds 144 seats, indicating that the Liberal Party will win by a solid margin, which will make passing legislation easier. This outcome is a far cry from the landslide Conservative victory many had anticipated.

Poilievre's Downfall

PETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

What caused Poilievre’s dramatic fall from front-runner to losing his parliamentary seat?

Despite his surge in popularity earlier this year, which coincided with enthusiasm surrounding Trump’s inauguration, many attribute the Conservative loss to Trump’s influence. Commentators argue that Trump’s repeated references to Canada as the "51st state" gave Liberals a rallying cry: Canadian sovereignty. The Liberal Party framed a vote for Poilievre as a vote to surrender Canada to U.S. influence, positioning Carney as the defender of national independence.

Others argue that Poilievre’s lackluster campaign was to blame. Critics suggest he should have embraced a Trump-style, Canada-first message, emphasizing a balanced relationship with the U.S. rather than distancing himself from Trump’s annexation remarks. By failing to counter the Liberal narrative effectively, Poilievre lost momentum and voter confidence.

This election marks a pivotal moment for Canada, with far-reaching implications for its sovereignty and economic stability. As Glenn has warned, Carney’s globalist leanings could align Canada more closely with international agendas, potentially at the expense of its national interests. Canadians now face the challenge of navigating this new political landscape under a leader with a controversial track record.