Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Finally! Witches Cast Spell to Stop Trump From Harming Rocks, Among Other Things

June 26, 2017
Staff

WRITER

On Wednesday, Witchiepoos came out in force with the waning crescent moon to cast spells to “bind” President Trump “and all those who abet him.”

It sounds like something that shouldn't be taken seriously, but the situation hit Glenn like a ton of bricks.

"They were instructed to call on spirits and demons of the infernal realms to bind Trump so that his malignant works may fail utterly. They want to prevent him from harming humans, trees, animals, and, quote, rocks from harm. Now, I'm glad somebody has finally brought this up . . . the amount of rocks that this administration has harmed is untold," Glenn said.

RELATED: Witches Cast Disturbing ‘Binding’ Spells Against Trump as Part of ‘the Resistance’

Co-host Pat Gray estimated that it could be well into the millions.

"It's an untold sad, sad tale of how some rocks are pried from their family in what we haphazardly have just named gravel pits, and their family members are ripped and sent to other driveways, sometimes halfway around the country, for those rock families never to be united again," Glenn revealed.

Who is responsible for this rock travesty? Trump, Donald J. Trump, the president of the United States of America, according to the witches.

"How much gravel has he used in his life? The harm of the rock families must stop, must stop. Sometimes, he grinds stones into smaller stones. Can you imagine if somebody took your children and ground them up into smaller children? Would you be happy?" Glenn asked.

"I don't know if rocks have children or families," Pat cautioned.

"Please, Pat, stop with the denial," Glenn said.

In addition to rocks, the witches also want to prevent Trump from harming humans, trees and animals, as well as condemn those who enable Trump's wickedness. So . . . beware.

Enjoy the complimentary clip or read the transcript for details.

GLENN: Should we go into the witches that are now casting spells on Donald Trump?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Which, I don't know where to go with this story.

PAT: On Donald and all those who abet him. So it's not just Donald Trump.

GLENN: So here it is: Large Facebook group composed of self-described witches cast spells to bind President Trump and all those who abet him. On Wednesday -- you know what, that is a word I haven't really seen around since maybe 1626.

(chuckling)

On Wednesday, a large Facebook group composed of the self-described witches began to cast the spells. The group, which calls itself Bind Trump has more than 2,000 members. Although it's unclear exactly how many participated in the event, on the night of the alleged binding ceremony, dozens posted pictures and videos of their anti-Trump rituals.

We have got to see the videos.

JEFFY: They've been doing it since March.

GLENN: Can you get us the audio of that? And, Stu, could you look into a -- a -- perhaps a warlock. Wasn't Bill Rogers -- do you guys remember Bill Rogers?

STU: Oh, yeah.

GLENN: He used to be on the show a long time ago, because I believe he was some sort of a warlock, to unbind the spells tomorrow.

STU: That's an interesting -- I don't know.

JEFFY: According to the witches too, a binding spell is different than a curse or a hex. So...

GLENN: Well, you would know, Jeffy. What -- what is a binding --

JEFFY: I don't quite know the difference. I'm just saying that's what the witches have said.

GLENN: Okay. So here's -- the witches' event was scheduled to correspond with the waning crescent moon, and the group's members used an organized liturgy to wish evil on Trump's agenda. The participants were instructed to gather a number of components to aid them in their efforts, including a tarot card reader, an unflattering picture of Donald Trump. I don't know why -- why can't you use a nice picture of Donald Trump? Is the queen of all witches up in heaven going -- sorry. I don't mean to insult witches. I don't know what your practice is exactly. But are they like, "No. It's got to be an unflattering picture. This one -- this one makes me feel good." They're supposed to have candles, a small bowl of water, an ashtray, or a dish of sand, and a feather.

(chuckling)

STU: Okay.

GLENN: Now, it -- it sounds like something you shouldn't take seriously. But have I ever struck you as the guy that doesn't take stuff like this seriously? No.

PAT: No.

GLENN: No. No. They were instructed to call on spirits and demons of the infernal realms to bind Trump so that his malignant works may fail utterly. They want to prevent him from harming humans, trees, animals, and, quote, rocks from harm.

Now, I'm glad somebody has finally brought this up. But the amount of rocks that this administration has harmed is --

PAT: It's well into the millions already. Millions of rocks have been armed.

GLENN: It's untold. And it's an untold sad, sad tale of how some rocks are pried from their family in -- in what we haphazardly have just named gravel pits, and their family members are ripped and sent to other driveways, sometimes halfway around the country, for those rock families never to be united again. And who is responsible for this?

PAT: Donald Trump.

GLENN: He's a builder.

PAT: Donald Trump.

GLENN: How much gravel has he used in his life? The arm of the rock families must stop. Must stop. Sometimes, he grinds stones into smaller stones.

PAT: It's happened, yeah. It's happened.

GLENN: Can you imagine if somebody took your children and ground them up into smaller children? Would you be happy?

PAT: No, I wouldn't.

GLENN: If they took your family and ground your family up --

PAT: I don't know if rocks have children or families.

GLENN: Please, Pat. Stop with the denial. And they took and ground your children up and sprinkled them in some driveway. Your kids were what the Prius tires were driving on here in California.

PAT: I would not like it.

GLENN: No. No. You wouldn't be happy. The witches also condemn those who enable Trump's wickedness. They need to have their towers of vanity struck down.

That's the only thing -- that's the only thing that makes sense to me is strike down the towers of vanity.

Afterward, the witches were instructed, ground yourself by having a good hearty laugh. Jump up and down. Clap your hands. Stomp your feet. Have a bite to eat. Grounding is very important. Don't neglect it. And, remember, he hates people laughing at him.

PAT: According to Daniel Asor, who is a rabbi in Israel, he said people should not take these kinds of ceremonies lightly. He said, witchcraft or its real name Satanism is explicitly a power struggle, which is why it's so readily dragged into politics. Satanism, in its essence, pits the adversary against God.

JEFFY: Even if you're a good witch?

GLENN: There are no good witches. Glenda -- did you see Wicked? Glenda was not a good witch. That is a true live documentary that is happening in New York of all places. They've decided to expose the truth about that so-called good witch.

STU: What about Bewitched? Seems like a generally good witch.

GLENN: And what happened to her?

STU: I don't know.

GLENN: Dead.

STU: Is she?

GLENN: Yeah. What happened to her husband? Her first husband that we all know suddenly changed features? All of a sudden, Dagwood or Darewood or whatever his name was -- remember? All of a sudden, he was -- he looked one way, and then we were all supposed to notice. She hadn't fundamentally changed him. She killed him and replaced him. And the spell didn't work on me. I knew he was a different guy.

STU: Wow, you really do go deep. These are deep dives.

GLENN: Like I said, not a lot of people are giving you this analysis on the witch thing. I actually agree with the rabbi. I don't take this lightly at all. I mean, I don't know how many of the 2,000 people are serious. This is kind of like the -- what is it? The secret grove -- what is that place called in California?

STU: Bohemian Grove.

GLENN: Oh, yeah, Bohemian Grove. The Bohemian Grove. I don't think -- you know, I wrote about it in my book, The Eye of Moloch. And it's a fiction novel. Better than Brad Thor's, I think, quite honestly. In fact, I could do an interview about that now if you would like.

But I wrote about it in my book the Eye of Moloch. And I explained how I believe some of the stuff works. But I did it in a -- you know, a fiction sort of setting.

And, you know, the Bohemian Grove does exist. And all of these people do come from all over the world. All these high leaders. And they do apparently do this old owl thing, where they set it on fire or set a little boat on fire with that people in it. No actual little people were harmed.

And there's these little figures that they put in it. And then they, I don't know, set them on fire and throw them in the belly of the owl or something weird. I don't think anybody there takes that seriously. Maybe a couple of people. There might be, I don't know, 1,000 people there. Maybe two, really understand that that's an ancient ritual and take it seriously.

The rest are just having a party. And they're just, oh, this is funny. Oh, there's nothing to this. They don't have any intention. They don't even know what it means. They don't care. But they are performing an ancient ritual. And the same I believe with the witches.

You know, I'm not a witch hunter. I don't. You know, I'm sure there are good witches. I'm sure there are people that are just witches. They just care about the environment. And whatever witches do. They don't fly on broomsticks or any of that nonsense.

But I do believe things like this, you are performing ancient pagan rituals that I do believe do play into the adversary, do play into darkness, and I don't think we should take these things lightly. Although, I don't think Donald Trump at any point is going to be bound or -- or turn into a newt. But that's just me.

Presidential debate recap: The good, the bad and the ugly

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

The second presidential debate was many things--some good, some bad, but one thing was made clear: this election is far from over.

If you were watching the debate with Glenn during the BlazeTV exclusive debate coverage, then you already know how the debate went: Kamala lied through her teeth and Trump faced a three-pronged attack from Harris and the two ABC moderators. This was not the debate performance we were hoping for, but it could have gone far worse. If you didn't get the chance to watch the debate or can't bring yourself to watch it again and are looking for a recap, we got you covered. Here are the good, the bad, and the ugly from the second presidential debate:

The Good

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Let's start with what went well.

While there was certainly room for improvement, Trump's performance wasn't terrible, especially compared to his performance in other debates. He showed restraint, kept himself from being too brash, and maintained the name-calling to a minimum. In comparison, Kamala Harris was struggling to maintain her composure. Harris was visibly emotional and continued to make obnoxious facial expressions, which included several infuriating eye-rolls and patronizing smirks.

The Bad

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Despite all that, the debate could have gone much better...

While Trump was able to keep his cool during the debate, he was not able to stay on track. Kamala kept making inflammatory comments meant to derail Trump, and every time, he took the bait. Trump spent far too long defending his career and other extraneous issues instead of discussing issues relevant to the American people and revealing Kamala's failures as Vice President.

Trump's biggest blunder during the debate was his failure to prevent Kamala from leaving that debate looking like a credible option as president. Kamala was fairly unknown to the American people and had remained that way on purpose, giving only one interview after Biden stepped down from the campaign. This is because every time Kamala opens her mouth, she typically makes a fool of herself. Trump needed to give Kamala more time to stick her foot in her mouth and to press Kamala on the Biden administration's failures over the past four years. Instead, he took her bait and let her run down the clock, and by the end of the debate, she left looking far more competent than she actually is.

The Ugly

If anything, the debate reminded us that this election is far from over, and it's more important now than ever for Trump to win.

The most noteworthy occurrence of the debate was the blatantly obvious bias of the ABC debate moderators against Trump. Many people have described the debate as a "three vs. one dogpile," with the moderators actively participating in debating Trump. If you didn't believe that the media was in the back pocket of the Democrats before, it's hard to deny it now. Kamala stood on stage and lied repeatedly with impunity knowing that the moderators and the mainstream media at large would cover for her.

The stakes have never been higher. With so many forces arrayed against Trump, it's clear to see that the Left cannot afford to let Trump win this November. The shape of America as we know it is on the line. Kamala represents the final push by the globalist movement to take root and assimilate America into the growing global hivemind.

The election is far from over. This is our sign to stand up and fight for our nation and our values and save America.

Glenn: Illegal aliens could swing the 2024 election, and it spells trouble for Trump

ELIZABETH RUIZ / Stringer | Getty Images

Either Congress must pass the SAVE Act, or states must protect the integrity of their elections — especially the seven swing states that could shift the outcome of 2024 by a hair’s breadth.

Progressives rely on three main talking points about illegal aliens voting in our elections.

The first is one of cynical acceptance. They admit that illegal immigrants are already voting but argue that there is nothing we can do to stop it, suggesting that it’s just another factor we should expect in future elections. This position shows no respect for our electoral system or the rule of law and doesn’t warrant further attention.

This election will be very similar to 2020. It’s like football — a game of inches.

The second talking point targets the right. Progressives question why Republicans care, asking why they assume illegal immigrants voting would only benefit the other side. They suggest that some of these voters might also support the GOP.

On this point, the data says otherwise.

Across the board, immigrants vote overwhelmingly for Democrats, regardless of what state they’re in. The vast majority of migrants are coming up from South America, a region that is undergoing a current “left-wing” experiment by voting for far-left candidates practically across the board. Ninety-two percent of South America’s population favors the radical left, and they’re pouring over our border in record numbers — and, according to the data, they’re not changing their voting habits.

The third main talking point concedes that illegal immigrants are voting but not enough to make a significant dent in our elections — that their effect is minuscule.

That isn’t what the numbers show either.

Texas just audited its voter rolls and had to remove more than 1 million ineligible voters. The SAVE Act would mandate all states conduct such audits, but the left in Congress is currently trying to stop its passage. Dare I say that the left's pushback is because illegal immigration actually plays in Democrats' favor on Election Day?

Out of the 6,500 noncitizens removed from the voter rolls, nearly 2,000 had prior voting history, proving that illegal aliens are voting. But do the numbers matter, or are they “minuscule,” as the left claims? Let’s examine whether these illegal voting trends can make a dent in the states that matter the most on Election Day.

The corporate legacy media agree that Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin will swing the election in November. By Election Day, an estimated 8 million illegal aliens will be living in the United States. Can these 8 million illegal immigrants change the course of the 2024 election? Let’s look at the election data from each of these seven swing states:

These are the numbers being sold to us as “insignificant” and “not enough to make a difference.” Arizona and Georgia were won in 2020 by a razor-thin margin of approximately 10,000 votes, and they have the most illegal immigrants — besides North Carolina — of all the swing states.

This election will be very similar to 2020. It’s like football — a game of inches. The progressives are importing an electorate to extend their ground by feet, yards, and often miles.

This is why Democrats in Congress oppose the SAVE Act, why the Justice Department has ignored cases of illegal voting in the past, and why the corporate left-wing media is gaslighting the entire country on its significance. This is a power play, and the entire Western world is under the same assault.

If things stay the status quo, these numbers prove the very real possibility of an election swing by illegal immigrants, and it will not favor our side of the aisle. Congress must pass the SAVE Act. If it fails, states must step up to protect the integrity of their elections — especially the seven swing states that could shift the outcome of 2024 by a hair’s breadth.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on TheBlaze.com.

Hunter pleads GUILTY, but did he get a pass on these 3 GLARING crimes?

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

Last week, Hunter Biden made the shocking decision to suddenly plead guilty to all nine charges of tax-related crimes after claiming innocence since 2018.

Hunter first tried an "Alford plead" in which a defendant maintains their innocence while accepting the sentencing, typically due to the overwhelming evidence against them. Hunter's Alford plead was not accepted after the prosecutors objected to the suggestion, and Hunter quickly pleaded guilty.

Glenn could not believe just how disrespectful this situation was to the justice system and the American people. After years of lying about his innocence, which only served to deepen the divide in our country, Hunter decided to change his tune at the last minute and admit his guilt. Moreover, many expect Joe Biden will swoop in after the election and bail his son out with a presidential pardon.

This isn't the first time Hunter's crimes have turned out to be more than just a "right-wing conspiracy theory," and, odds are, it won't be the last. Here are three crimes Hunter may or may not be guilty of:

Gun charges: Found guilty

This June, Hunter Biden was found guilty of three federal gun charges, which could possibly land him up to 25 years in prison. Hunter purchased a revolver in 2018 while addicted to crack, and lied to the gun dealer about his addiction. While Hunter could face up to 25 years in prison, it's unlikely to be the case as first-time offenders rarely receive the maximum sentence. That's assuming Joe even lets it go that far.

Tax evasion: Plead guilty

Last week, Hunter changed his plea to "guilty" after years of pleading innocent to federal tax evasion charges. Since 2018, Delaware attorneys have been working on Hunter's case, and just before the trial was set to begin, Hunter changed his plea. According to the investigation, Hunter owed upwards of $1.4 million in federal taxes that he avoided by writing them off as fraudulent business deductions. Instead, Hunter spent this money on strippers, escorts, luxury cars, hotels, and, undoubtedly, crack.

Joe's involvement with Hunter's foreign dealings: Yet to be proven

Despite repeated claims against it, there is ample evidence supporting the theory Joe Biden was aware of Hunter's business dealings and even had a hand in them. This includes testimony from Devon Archer, one of Hunter's business partners, confirming Joe joined several business calls. Despite the mounting evidence Joe Biden was involved in Hunter's overseas business dealings and was using his influence to Hunter's benefit, the Bidens still maintain their innocence.

Why do we know so much about the Georgia shooter but NOTHING about Trump's shooter?

Jessica McGowan / Stringer | Getty Images

It's only been a few days since the horrific shooting at the Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia, and the shooter, Colt Gray, and his father, Colin Gray, have already made their first court appearance. Over the last few days, more and more information has come out about the shooter and his family, including details of Colt's troubled childhood and history of mental health issues. The FBI said Colton had been on their radar.

This situation has Glenn fired up, asking, "Why do we have an FBI?" It seems like every time there is a mass shooting, the FBI unhelpfully admits the shooter was "on the radar," but what good does that do? While it is great we know everything about the Georgia shooter, including what he got for Christmas, why do we still know next to NOTHING about Trump's would-be assassin? Here are three things we know about the Georgia shooter that we stilldon't know about the Trump shooter:

Digital footprint

Just a few days after the shooting, authorities have already released many details of the Georgia shooter, Colt Gray's, digital footprint. This includes extensive conversations and photographs revolving around school shootings that were pulled from Gray's Discord account, a digital messaging platform.

Compared to this, the FBI claims Thomas Crooks, the shooter who almost assassinated Donald Trump, had little to no digital footprint, and outside of an ominous message sent by Crooks on Steam (an online video game platform), we know nothing about his online activities. Doesn't it seem strange that Crooks, a young adult in 2024 who owned a cell phone and a laptop left behind no digital trail of any relevance to his crime?

Home life

The FBI has painted a vivid image of what Colt Gray's home life was like, including his troubling relationship with his parents. They released information about his parents' tumultuous divorce, being evicted from his home, several interactions with law enforcement and CPS, and abuse. Investigators also found written documents of Colt's related to other school shootings, suggesting he had been thinking of this for some time before committing the atrocity.

In contrast, we still know next to nothing about Crooks's home life.

How he got the weapon

Spencer Platt / Staff | Getty Images

Colt Gray was gifted the rifle he used in the shooting from his father for Christmas last year. We also know Colt's father is an avid hunter and would take Colt on hunting trips. In 2023, Colt was the subject of an investigation regarding a threat he made online to shoot up a school. During the interview, Colt stated he did not make the threat. Moreover, his father admitted to owning several firearms, but said Colt was not allowed full access to them. The investigation was later closed after the accusations could not be sustained.

In comparison, all we know is that Crooks stole his father's rifle and did not inform his parents of any part of his plan. We have no clue how Crooks acquired the rest of his equipment, which included nearly a hundred extra rounds of ammunition, a bullet-proof vest, and several homemade bombs. How did Crooks manage to acquire all of his equipment without the FBI taking notice?

It feels like the FBI is either incompetent or hiding important information from the American people. Or both.