Glenn responds to an internet troll with total class

Glenn just gave us all a lesson on how to deal with internet trolls with finesse, grace, and class.

Earlier this week, Glenn posted a video on Instagram of his daughter producing her first musical album, complete in a studio with a full orchestra. Most of the comments were encouraging, but in an age where once can hide behind digital screens, unseemly and derogatory comments are to be expected. One in particular caught Glenn's eye.

An Instagram user named Jessica commented: "It pays to have a parent who can publish her music. #privilaged #chosen lol. Not everyone is so lucky!" She went on to make other derogatory comments.

Social media gives people anonymity that often fuels hateful dialogue, and it can be tempting to return hate with hate. But instead, Glenn's direct response to Jessica shows how we can respond to those who accuse us with firmness and truth yet also with understanding and grace. Here is Glenn's letter to his internet troll:

Jessica,

I saw your page and it seems like you work out and are in great shape.

I have two daughters with epilepsy and one with CP who finds it difficult to keep their shape like you can. What a joy for you and indeed a privilege.

One of my daughters has difficulty even opening her hand, and could not lift weights nor work out as you do.

Now, I could talk with you about privilege and how you won in the gene lottery, but I WILL NOT as it is not my place to judge as I do not know the first thing about you. But, I will share also that I am blessed and privileged to witness and learn from both of my daughters who each live their life to their fullest and push past things I am not sure I could.

Chey even pushes herself to perform even though she has dyslexia as well which makes reading -- let alone memorizing lines very difficult.

They are both happy and we love them and are very proud of them. My eldest daughter with CP, holds a meaningful job and is privileged to live in such times where Uber makes her life so much easier.

I wish I could get to know you and the things that you may struggle with. When I get to know someone and ask about their lives, it always seems to amaze me how much we have in common.

I came from a hard working blue collar family, one that suffered from generations of abuse. I don’t know what it is like to grow up in a happy, non abusive, non alcoholic family. Maybe you do, or sadly, perhaps this is where our lives begin to show the same struggles.

In response to the years of damage inflicted on my family especially my sisters, I have worked hard my whole life to break that generational cycle.

It is evil and every man or woman that treats a child or spouse unrighteously will be held accountable. I know that doesn’t help those still suffering, but when abusers die, it is, somewhat, a privilege to know and believe in an Eternally Just God.

Because my father did try not to be his father, without realizing it, he became his mother, My paternal grandmother as he then married an abuser. He told me once that it was my responsibility to "not be like him," to learn a new way to live. I did, and I am happy to report that my children, wife and I are living what so many would call a privilege. A life without abuse.

It is indeed a privilege that not enough families share.

My father was poor when he died, and while we didn’t seem to know it at the time, he was poor his whole life. We didn’t notice, because we never focused on what we didn’t have or covet the life of others. Although, it was difficult to not want some of my friends parents to be my own.

When I left home, I helped for decades to support him and my step mother with whatever I could.

The only thing of value my father left to me, was an idea that IF I SET MY MIND TO IT, I could and SHOULD be a BETTER MAN than he was. Not richer or more successful but a better man.

Both of my parents and maternal grandparents also taught me from birth that it was a privilege to be born and live in America. That here, if you worked hard and for no reason many times other than luck, being at the right place at the right time, you can succeed in however you define that. You may not build an empire like Vanderbilt did, but just because you are poor, disadvantaged or even someone born with CP, you didn’t have to define yourself as such. You could define your own life. That the secret was not in the success, it was in the "pursuit of your happiness."

You may find this "happiness" as you pursue your body building. I would not, but maybe you do. Because you chose to focus on that, you are successful -- and YOU DID THAT (well PERHAPS with a little bit of luck with the gene pool).

I am sure you work hard for a living as well. Perhaps this is another place we can find commonality. I have worked for a paycheck since I was 8. My father paid me about 75 cents per hour to sweep and scrape the floors and wash the pots and pans at the bakery. (It was expected of all of us in the family to help and work). Not in an abusive way, rather as a family. Even as screwed up as we were. We did find moments, while working, where we could laugh and act like a normal family.

At thirteen, just before my mother’s suicide, (I hope we do not connect here -- I have now experienced three suicides in my family, and in my 20s a friend saved me from repeating my mother's last and biggest mistake), but again, at 13, I began to work in my now full-time profession.

There was no one more surprised than I when 4 years ago I was inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame. We joke about it on-air all the time as frankly, I am surprised at times that people actually listen to my show. While I had earned that award, I guess, there were many more broadcasters that were, in my opinion, more deserving (H/T to John and Ken). It indeed was my privilege to accept that award the year of covid. I was bummed that in 2020 there was no grand induction dinner with those in my profession that so many others for many decades had the privilege to enjoy. But, the honor of being voted in by my peers was more of a privilege than anything else.

As it comes to the time I'm spending with my daughter working on her album....

YOU ARE RIGHT!

I am so glad that you took the time to remind her that she indeed is privileged to do things that not many have done, and to do it with a father that doesn’t abuse, her, instead loves her and as we spoke of just last night, we like each other a lot.

As she is now 18, I have given her this opportunity to select her own music, work with some of the people I have had the privilege to be around and learn from my whole life, to help her record and produce her own album.

Yes, “what a privilege.” And don’t think I haven’t thought about that almost every day of my children’s lives.

In today’s world, let alone America, to have a job -- especially one you enjoy and don’t have to have several others just to able to afford the basics -- is a real blessing and, as you would say, “a privilege.” Due to reckless policies, frankly from both sides of the political spectrum, inflation is getting worse and worse. Do the "privileged" experts that run things like the FED understand how darn near impossible it is for the average family to even afford food?

It is why my wife and I have started and fund many charities, most years we tithe/and give at or above 20% of what I earn to those who need a helping hand. What a joy and privilege. I don’t know, nor care about the motives of others, but we do it, because we remember how hard it was for our parents .

It is funny how "privilege" works. Those who receive some of the blessings that Tania and I as well as thousands of others like you freely give, may feel privileged over those who did not receive, while we feel privileged to help them.

The truth is that actually we are ALL simply blessed to live at this time, with the families and circumstances we are born with. And when we realize how much we each have, not comparing with others, we find ourselves so much happier. I know, as I lost my "fame" and fortune once already due to my alcoholism. I feel privileged just to able to help one another in what ever form that may take. Perhaps someone is reading our conversation and finding benefits in doing so.

Finally, about my daughter's album, one of the goals of this (ad)venture, is to help her learn how to start a business, be responsible with the privilege of earning money, therefore she will take every dollar that it earns to first pay all of the bills from making this album and give the next 10% to those who are truly underprivileged.

Tania and I feel that is an important part of life: Give to others first. And RECOGNIZE that no one gets a free ride, (yes, even my privileged children) but, some do ride with a softer suspension and she indeed is one of those.

Thank you so much again for your reminder, even though she has heard that from me and her mom her whole life, it helps to hear it from another source.

I am so glad you wrote as I just don't think it is a coincidence that just yesterday before we posted those videos, I sat quietly in the recording studio thinking, “how fortunate I am to be to born to parents that weren’t privileged to something like this for me, and here I am in a recording studio, in Prague nonetheless, with my daughter. What a blessing for us both.”

But, in both good and very bad ways, my parents gave me perhaps a greater gift: to break the cycle of abuse and poverty AND build in me the desire to be a better man and father.

I wish you the best on your ventures and all the exciting privileges that you will find around every corner.

We indeed are ALL blessed to make our own choices.

Wow, think of how many billions in countries like China don’t have OUR privilege. Perhaps we should pay more attention to that!!!! Your comment has just been such a blessing.

Glenn

View the full post here.

Is the U.N. plotting to control 30% of U.S. land by 2030?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

A reliable conservative senator faces cancellation for listening to voters. But the real threat to public lands comes from the last president’s backdoor globalist agenda.

Something ugly is unfolding on social media, and most people aren’t seeing it clearly. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) — one of the most constitutionally grounded conservatives in Washington — is under fire for a housing provision he first proposed in 2022.

You wouldn’t know that from scrolling through X. According to the latest online frenzy, Lee wants to sell off national parks, bulldoze public lands, gut hunting and fishing rights, and hand America’s wilderness to Amazon, BlackRock, and the Chinese Communist Party. None of that is true.

Lee’s bill would have protected against the massive land-grab that’s already under way — courtesy of the Biden administration.

I covered this last month. Since then, the backlash has grown into something like a political witch hunt — not just from the left but from the right. Even Donald Trump Jr., someone I typically agree with, has attacked Lee’s proposal. He’s not alone.

Time to look at the facts the media refuses to cover about Lee’s federal land plan.

What Lee actually proposed

Over the weekend, Lee announced that he would withdraw the federal land sale provision from his housing bill. He said the decision was in response to “a tremendous amount of misinformation — and in some cases, outright lies,” but also acknowledged that many Americans brought forward sincere, thoughtful concerns.

Because of the strict rules surrounding the budget reconciliation process, Lee couldn’t secure legally enforceable protections to ensure that the land would be made available “only to American families — not to China, not to BlackRock, and not to any foreign interests.” Without those safeguards, he chose to walk it back.

That’s not selling out. That’s leadership.

It's what the legislative process is supposed to look like: A senator proposes a bill, the people respond, and the lawmaker listens. That was once known as representative democracy. These days, it gets you labeled a globalist sellout.

The Biden land-grab

To many Americans, “public land” brings to mind open spaces for hunting, fishing, hiking, and recreation. But that’s not what Sen. Mike Lee’s bill targeted.

His proposal would have protected against the real land-grab already under way — the one pushed by the Biden administration.

In 2021, Biden launched a plan to “conserve” 30% of America’s lands and waters by 2030. This effort follows the United Nations-backed “30 by 30” initiative, which seeks to place one-third of all land and water under government control.

Ask yourself: Is the U.N. focused on preserving your right to hunt and fish? Or are radical environmentalists exploiting climate fears to restrict your access to American land?

  Smith Collection/Gado / Contributor | Getty Images

As it stands, the federal government already owns 640 million acres — nearly one-third of the entire country. At this rate, the government will hit that 30% benchmark with ease. But it doesn’t end there. The next phase is already in play: the “50 by 50” agenda.

That brings me to a piece of legislation most Americans haven’t even heard of: the Sustains Act.

Passed in 2023, the law allows the federal government to accept private funding from organizations, such as BlackRock or the Bill Gates Foundation, to support “conservation programs.” In practice, the law enables wealthy elites to buy influence over how American land is used and managed.

Moreover, the government doesn’t even need the landowner’s permission to declare that your property contributes to “pollination,” or “photosynthesis,” or “air quality” — and then regulate it accordingly. You could wake up one morning and find out that the land you own no longer belongs to you in any meaningful sense.

Where was the outrage then? Where were the online crusaders when private capital and federal bureaucrats teamed up to quietly erode private property rights across America?

American families pay the price

The real danger isn’t in Mike Lee’s attempt to offer more housing near population centers — land that would be limited, clarified, and safeguarded in the final bill. The real threat is the creeping partnership between unelected global elites and our own government, a partnership designed to consolidate land, control rural development, and keep Americans penned in so-called “15-minute cities.”

BlackRock buying entire neighborhoods and pricing out regular families isn’t by accident. It’s part of a larger strategy to centralize populations into manageable zones, where cars are unnecessary, rural living is unaffordable, and every facet of life is tracked, regulated, and optimized.

That’s the real agenda. And it’s already happening , and Mike Lee’s bill would have been an effort to ensure that you — not BlackRock, not China — get first dibs.

I live in a town of 451 people. Even here, in the middle of nowhere, housing is unaffordable. The American dream of owning a patch of land is slipping away, not because of one proposal from a constitutional conservative, but because global powers and their political allies are already devouring it.

Divide and conquer

This controversy isn’t really about Mike Lee. It’s about whether we, as a nation, are still capable of having honest debates about public policy — or whether the online mob now controls the narrative. It’s about whether conservatives will focus on facts or fall into the trap of friendly fire and circular firing squads.

More importantly, it’s about whether we’ll recognize the real land-grab happening in our country — and have the courage to fight back before it’s too late.


This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

URGENT: FIVE steps to CONTROL AI before it's too late!

MANAURE QUINTERO / Contributor | Getty Images

By now, many of us are familiar with AI and its potential benefits and threats. However, unless you're a tech tycoon, it can feel like you have little influence over the future of artificial intelligence.

For years, Glenn has warned about the dangers of rapidly developing AI technologies that have taken the world by storm.

He acknowledges their significant benefits but emphasizes the need to establish proper boundaries and ethics now, while we still have control. But since most people aren’t Silicon Valley tech leaders making the decisions, how can they help keep AI in check?

Recently, Glenn interviewed Tristan Harris, a tech ethicist deeply concerned about the potential harm of unchecked AI, to discuss its societal implications. Harris highlighted a concerning new piece of legislation proposed by Texas Senator Ted Cruz. This legislation proposes a state-level moratorium on AI regulation, meaning only the federal government could regulate AI. Harris noted that there’s currently no Federal plan for regulating AI. Until the federal government establishes a plan, tech companies would have nearly free rein with their AI. And we all know how slowly the federal government moves.

  

This is where you come in. Tristan Harris shared with Glenn the top five actions you should urge your representatives to take regarding AI, including opposing the moratorium until a concrete plan is in place. Now is your chance to influence the future of AI. Contact your senator and congressman today and share these five crucial steps they must take to keep AI in check:

Ban engagement-optimized AI companions for kids

Create legislation that will prevent AI from being designed to maximize addiction, sexualization, flattery, and attachment disorders, and to protect young people’s mental health and ability to form real-life friendships.

Establish basic liability laws

Companies need to be held accountable when their products cause real-world harm.

Pass increased whistleblower protections

Protect concerned technologists working inside the AI labs from facing untenable pressures and threats that prevent them from warning the public when the AI rollout is unsafe or crosses dangerous red lines.

Prevent AI from having legal rights

Enact laws so AIs don’t have protected speech or have their own bank accounts, making sure our legal system works for human interests over AI interests.

Oppose the state moratorium on AI 

Call your congressman or Senator Cruz’s office, and demand they oppose the state moratorium on AI without a plan for how we will set guardrails for this technology.

Glenn: Only Trump dared to deliver on decades of empty promises

Tasos Katopodis / Stringer | Getty Images

The Islamic regime has been killing Americans since 1979. Now Trump’s response proves we’re no longer playing defense — we’re finally hitting back.

The United States has taken direct military action against Iran’s nuclear program. Whatever you think of the strike, it’s over. It’s happened. And now, we have to predict what happens next. I want to help you understand the gravity of this situation: what happened, what it means, and what might come next. To that end, we need to begin with a little history.

Since 1979, Iran has been at war with us — even if we refused to call it that.

We are either on the verge of a remarkable strategic victory or a devastating global escalation. Time will tell.

It began with the hostage crisis, when 66 Americans were seized and 52 were held for over a year by the radical Islamic regime. Four years later, 17 more Americans were murdered in the U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut, followed by 241 Marines in the Beirut barracks bombing.

Then came the Khobar Towers bombing in 1996, which killed 19 more U.S. airmen. Iran had its fingerprints all over it.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, Iranian-backed proxies killed hundreds of American soldiers. From 2001 to 2020 in Afghanistan and 2003 to 2011 in Iraq, Iran supplied IEDs and tactical support.

The Iranians have plotted assassinations and kidnappings on U.S. soil — in 2011, 2021, and again in 2024 — and yet we’ve never really responded.

The precedent for U.S. retaliation has always been present, but no president has chosen to pull the trigger until this past weekend. President Donald Trump struck decisively. And what our military pulled off this weekend was nothing short of extraordinary.

Operation Midnight Hammer

The strike was reportedly called Operation Midnight Hammer. It involved as many as 175 U.S. aircraft, including 12 B-2 stealth bombers — out of just 19 in our entire arsenal. Those bombers are among the most complex machines in the world, and they were kept mission-ready by some of the finest mechanics on the planet.

   USAF / Handout | Getty Images

To throw off Iranian radar and intelligence, some bombers flew west toward Guam — classic misdirection. The rest flew east, toward the real targets.

As the B-2s approached Iranian airspace, U.S. submarines launched dozens of Tomahawk missiles at Iran’s fortified nuclear facilities. Minutes later, the bombers dropped 14 MOPs — massive ordnance penetrators — each designed to drill deep into the earth and destroy underground bunkers. These bombs are the size of an F-16 and cost millions of dollars apiece. They are so accurate, I’ve been told they can hit the top of a soda can from 15,000 feet.

They were built for this mission — and we’ve been rehearsing this run for 15 years.

If the satellite imagery is accurate — and if what my sources tell me is true — the targeted nuclear sites were utterly destroyed. We’ll likely rely on the Israelis to confirm that on the ground.

This was a master class in strategy, execution, and deterrence. And it proved that only the United States could carry out a strike like this. I am very proud of our military, what we are capable of doing, and what we can accomplish.

What comes next

We don’t yet know how Iran will respond, but many of the possibilities are troubling. The Iranians could target U.S. forces across the Middle East. On Monday, Tehran launched 20 missiles at U.S. bases in Qatar, Syria, and Kuwait, to no effect. God forbid, they could also unleash Hezbollah or other terrorist proxies to strike here at home — and they just might.

Iran has also threatened to shut down the Strait of Hormuz — the artery through which nearly a fifth of the world’s oil flows. On Sunday, Iran’s parliament voted to begin the process. If the Supreme Council and the ayatollah give the go-ahead, we could see oil prices spike to $150 or even $200 a barrel.

That would be catastrophic.

The 2008 financial collapse was pushed over the edge when oil hit $130. Western economies — including ours — simply cannot sustain oil above $120 for long. If this conflict escalates and the Strait is closed, the global economy could unravel.

The strike also raises questions about regime stability. Will it spark an uprising, or will the Islamic regime respond with a brutal crackdown on dissidents?

Early signs aren’t hopeful. Reports suggest hundreds of arrests over the weekend and at least one dissident executed on charges of spying for Israel. The regime’s infamous morality police, the Gasht-e Ershad, are back on the streets. Every phone, every vehicle — monitored. The U.S. embassy in Qatar issued a shelter-in-place warning for Americans.

Russia and China both condemned the strike. On Monday, a senior Iranian official flew to Moscow to meet with Vladimir Putin. That meeting should alarm anyone paying attention. Their alliance continues to deepen — and that’s a serious concern.

Now we pray

We are either on the verge of a remarkable strategic victory or a devastating global escalation. Time will tell. But either way, President Trump didn’t start this. He inherited it — and he took decisive action.

The difference is, he did what they all said they would do. He didn’t send pallets of cash in the dead of night. He didn’t sign another failed treaty.

He acted. Now, we pray. For peace, for wisdom, and for the strength to meet whatever comes next.


This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Globalize the Intifada? Why Mamdani’s plan spells DOOM for America

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

If New Yorkers hand City Hall to Zohran Mamdani, they’re not voting for change. They’re opening the door to an alliance of socialism, Islamism, and chaos.

It only took 25 years for New York City to go from the resilient, flag-waving pride following the 9/11 attacks to a political fever dream. To quote Michael Malice, “I'm old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it.”

Malice is talking about Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist assemblyman from Queens now eyeing the mayor’s office. Mamdani, a 33-year-old state representative emerging from relative political obscurity, is now receiving substantial funding for his mayoral campaign from the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

CAIR has a long and concerning history, including being born out of the Muslim Brotherhood and named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding case. Why would the group have dropped $100,000 into a PAC backing Mamdani’s campaign?

Mamdani blends political Islam with Marxist economics — two ideologies that have left tens of millions dead in the 20th century alone.

Perhaps CAIR has a vested interest in Mamdani’s call to “globalize the intifada.” That’s not a call for peaceful protest. Intifada refers to historic uprisings of Muslims against what they call the “Israeli occupation of Palestine.” Suicide bombings and street violence are part of the playbook. So when Mamdani says he wants to “globalize” that, who exactly is the enemy in this global scenario? Because it sure sounds like he's saying America is the new Israel, and anyone who supports Western democracy is the new Zionist.

Mamdani tried to clean up his language by citing the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, which once used “intifada” in an Arabic-language article to describe the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. So now he’s comparing Palestinians to Jewish victims of the Nazis? If that doesn’t twist your stomach into knots, you’re not paying attention.

If you’re “globalizing” an intifada, and positioning Israel — and now America — as the Nazis, that’s not a cry for human rights. That’s a call for chaos and violence.

Rising Islamism

But hey, this is New York. Faculty members at Columbia University — where Mamdani’s own father once worked — signed a letter defending students who supported Hamas after October 7. They also contributed to Mamdani’s mayoral campaign. And his father? He blamed Ronald Reagan and the religious right for inspiring Islamic terrorism, as if the roots of 9/11 grew in Washington, not the caves of Tora Bora.

   Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

 

This isn’t about Islam as a faith. We should distinguish between Islam and Islamism. Islam is a religion followed peacefully by millions. Islamism is something entirely different — an ideology that seeks to merge mosque and state, impose Sharia law, and destroy secular liberal democracies from within. Islamism isn’t about prayer and fasting. It’s about power.

Criticizing Islamism is not Islamophobia. It is not an attack on peaceful Muslims. In fact, Muslims are often its first victims.

Islamism is misogynistic, theocratic, violent, and supremacist. It’s hostile to free speech, religious pluralism, gay rights, secularism — even to moderate Muslims. Yet somehow, the progressive left — the same left that claims to fight for feminism, LGBTQ rights, and free expression — finds itself defending candidates like Mamdani. You can’t make this stuff up.

Blending the worst ideologies

And if that weren’t enough, Mamdani also identifies as a Democratic Socialist. He blends political Islam with Marxist economics — two ideologies that have left tens of millions dead in the 20th century alone. But don’t worry, New York. I’m sure this time socialism will totally work. Just like it always didn’t.

If you’re a business owner, a parent, a person who’s saved anything, or just someone who values sanity: Get out. I’m serious. If Mamdani becomes mayor, as seems likely, then New York City will become a case study in what happens when you marry ideological extremism with political power. And it won’t be pretty.

This is about more than one mayoral race. It’s about the future of Western liberalism. It’s about drawing a bright line between faith and fanaticism, between healthy pluralism and authoritarian dogma.

Call out radicalism

We must call out political Islam the same way we call out white nationalism or any other supremacist ideology. When someone chants “globalize the intifada,” that should send a chill down your spine — whether you’re Jewish, Christian, Muslim, atheist, or anything in between.

The left may try to shame you into silence with words like “Islamophobia,” but the record is worn out. The grooves are shallow. The American people see what’s happening. And we’re not buying it.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.