Stu & Pat resign

GLENN: I want to give you the story that we were talking about in the first half hour. I want to read the actual story. The only one that really covered it and did a good job on it is Mediaite. Mediaite I'm torn on and I think that's what you should be on all media. You should be torn. You should think that some of the stories they get right and some of the stories they don't get right. When they're writing about you, you’re sometimes like, yeah, finally somebody has gotten it right and other times you're like, no, that's not the story. And to me it shows that they tried to get the story right.

Here is an honest piece of reporting that I think, you know, anybody with an integrity an ounce of integrity would have reported on this story. Here's what they wrote. Let's end the week with some Shirley Sherroding, editing of a clip to make it sound like someone is saying something that is exactly the complete opposite of what they are saying. In this case the offender is Media Matters when they try to prove that Glenn Beck's radio cohosts were saying Keith Olberman was responsible for the deadly Manchester workplace shooting. Here was Media Matters' headline. Quote, Beck's sidekicks Gray and Burguiere, Keith Olberman and Media responsible for Manchester shooting, end quote. That was the headline. The side kicks are Pat Gray and Steve Burguiere who cohosted without Beck today. And why did Media Matters write this? Well, that is because what Beck and Burguiere said at first. Quote, Gray, obviously Keith Olberman is responsible for those eight people dead. Burguiere, quote, a guy like that who's a little unstable, anyway, can't help but react to the constant pressure of Keith Olberman on the air and on MSNBC and all of MSNBC talking about the racism that is out there, end quote, but the problem is the cohosts were being sarcastic to make a point. One minute later they got serious and Stu says, quote, Keith Olberman was not responsible for any shooting, but that part is conveniently out of the Media Matters' audio because Media Matters cut the audio right before they started to make it clear. Right after the Media Matters' edit, Burguiere says, quote, Obviously we're making a point here. Let's move to the case against the Tea Party members. They're constantly convinced that the government is after them. They're going to come after their guns. Well, who is always talking about that? Glenn Beck. So, therefore, he's responsible for every time anyone does anything violent. Later Gray says, just like you can't blame Keith Olberman for this dumb racist thing and Burguiere reiterates, Keith Olberman ills not responsible for any shooting. Keith Olberman is not. It's not possible for him to sit there and inspire that by talking about a topic.

Update, at the end of the story: Media has updated their post. Here's their correction. Correction: The original headline on this clip did not make clear let me give you the headline again. The headline is: Beck's sidekicks Gray and Burguiere Keith Olberman and Media responsible for Manchester shooting. The original headline on this clip did not make it clear that Beck's cohosts were being satirical when they linked Keith Olberman to the Manchester shooting.

PAT: They're right about that. Didn't make that clear.

STU: Not clear at all.

PAT: No.

GLENN: Their subsequent statements that Olberman was not responsible for the shooting, Media Matters regrets the error.

STU: Error.

GLENN: In other words, says Mediaite, in other words, the exact opposite of Media Matters' post. Now, there's no error there. Media Matters made no error. Be very clear. This is the kind of things are you recording this, media matter? You can go ahead and well, if I say this, though, if I say that you are nothing but a smear machine funded by Soros, what you'll print is: Glenn Beck hates us. Please donate to the DNC.

The Media Matters does nothing but smear. This is a political organization only and all they do is provide disinformation, period. They're trying to smear and discredit anyone who stands against the Soros selected machine.

PAT: And in this case, I mean, have they not discredited themselves to the point now where

GLENN: For anybody

PAT: for anything they say.

GLENN: Anybody who plays attention, but they're not playing for anybody who pays attention. They're not playing to those people. They are playing to those who are who rely on Twitter feeds, because all that was

STU: True.

PAT: Right. Exactly. And if you go back they probably pulled it down at this point, but if you go back ad look at the comment, the original way they posted it, they were going, I can't believe these people. How can it be obvious that Olberman is responsible? The real people who are responsible are the right wring didn't question it for a second.

GLENN: Do me a favor. Do me a favor. Make sure you get all of those comments and you go back in because nothing is gone forever. You go in and get all of those comments so the next time there's any kind of violence, we have those comments that all we have to do is change the names

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: These guys are ridiculous and I'm glad that I've distanced myself from Joe Kerry who fired and I want you to know, too, that today, because I'm using this as a teachable moment, not only can America see how stupid America was and how brilliant I was, in this moment I have also created or saved four jobs.

PAT: Four?

GLENN: Four jobs

STU: Pat and I, right?

GLENN: I saved your job, but when I fired you when Joe fired you

PAT: Yes, uh huh

GLENN: okay? I wasn't going to replace you. So, I stopped I closed those jobs?

STU: Okay.

GLENN: So, when I when I found out that you had been wronged, you two princes of men, really, I came in and I said, no. We are going to create those positions. So, I have saved two jobs and created two jobs.

PAT: That's four altogether

STU: But it's just Pat and I.

GLENN: I have saved please.

PAT: Do you want to talk to Joe again?

GLENN: I have saved or created four jobs

STU: Wow. So, this is a triumph for you.

[NOTE: Transcript may have been edited to enhance readability - audio archive includes full segment as it was originally aired]

TOP THREE craziest leftist reactions to Trump's McDonald's visit

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

Over the weekend, President Trump visited a McDonald's in Bucks County, Pennsylvania to serve up some french fries to hungry supporters.

MAGA fans from across the country came to celebrate and support Trump, quickly swamping the small town with a tide of Trump merch. With a roaring crowd outside, Trump cooked up some crispy fries and served them to a small selection of supporters through the drive-thru window, creating a light-hearted, fun momenta pleasant break from the turbulent election cycle.

Naturally, the Left quickly swooped in to rain on Trump's parade. From unsubstantiated fact-checks to overused insults, here are the craziest reactions to Trump's McDonald's trip:

Fact check on Donald Trump's claims about Kamala Harris

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

While working his brief 15-minute shift, Donald Trump quipped that he's now worked at McDonald's longer than Kamala Harris, referencing the Vice President's unsubstantiated claim that she worked at McDonald's one summer during college. McDonald's further substantiated Trump's claim by indicating that there are no existing records of Harris's employment, though they admit that records from the pre-digital age may not have survived to the present day.

Despite the lack of evidence, left-wing media outlets, such as the Washington Post, were quick to defend the Vice President. Their argument essentially put Trump's word against Harris's, suggesting that Trump was deliberately lying to defame the Vice President, while simultaneously treating Harris as a more credible source.

Pointing out the obvious fact that this was a political stunt

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

In what is likely the least informative journalistic piece of the century, MSNBC made the "shocking discovery" that Donald Trump didn't actually work at McDonald's and that the entire event was for his campaign. It's unclear what detail gave this away to the "ever-vigilant" reporters at MSNBC. Maybe it was the fact that McDonald's was closed for the event, or the lack of employees within the restaurant, or possibly it was the crowd of cheering fans outside. Thank you captain obvious, the event was a carefully coordinated and secure political event. The former President who has had several assassination attempts on his life did notwork in an unsecured restaurant, dealing with countless unknown people.

Truly "top-notch" reporting by MSNBC.

Calling Trump supporters "weird"... Again.

LOGAN CYRUS / Contributor | Getty Images

The New York Times had to really scrape the bottom of the barrel to come up with something to paint Trump's fast food fiesta in a negative light. Instead of attacking Trump, they went after his supporters who lined the street to cheer on their favorite presidential nominee. They went so far as to describe the event as a violent riot full of unhinged and uneducated fanatics. The New York Times even quoted a pro-Harris protester who showed up to the event and suggested that "Jan. 6 was maybe a trial run ... and now they’re a lot more organized — and a lot angrier.” The insults didn't stop there. They dredged up the archaic and cringeworthy Tim Walz original calling the Trump supporters "weird." This "zinger" doesn't have the punch the New York Times wanted it to have, and came across as a sad attempt to bring Trump down in one of his high points in his campaign.

RIGGED: Kamala Harris attempts to sway Fox interview in her favor, STILL falls short

Paul Morigi / Contributor | Getty Images

The election is mere weeks away and Kamala Harris just had her first adversarial interview since she began campaigning.

Last week, Harris sat down with Fox News journalist Bret Baier for an interview plagued with difficulties from the beginning. As Glenn recently pointed out, it seemed like Harris had done her best to ensure the interview was intentionally rigged against Baier. Despite being in front of Baier's diverse audience, she did not seem too interested in taking the opportunity to sell herself to a new demographic. Instead, Glenn hypothesized she was just after a quick soundbite to pander to her faltering core supporters.

However, the interview blew up in Kamala's face, and the American people took notice. Here's a rundown of Kamala's first Fox interview:

Rigged Interview

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

Harris and her team did everything possible to throw Bret Baier off his game and derail the interview in her favor. It started when Harris's team informed Fox that the interview, which was originally supposed to be an hour, would be cut in half. This left Baier scrambling to reformat his interview to better fit the new time requirement. Then Harris arrived at the interview ten minutes late, further shorting the interview.

The purpose behind Harris's tardiness became apparent during the interview. Every time Baier asked a question, Harris would launch into a lengthy word salad. Baier was forced to interject just so he was able to ask more than a couple of questions. Harris even pushed back, calling out Baier's interruptions, which of course, just wasted more time. Clearly, Harris or her staff realized that she could not sustain a hostile interview for any extended period, which is why Harris tried to filibuster away as much of the interview as possible.

When the brief interview was nearing the end of its allotted time, Harris's staff began signaling to Baier to end the interview. Despite the change in plans and late arrival, her staff was determined to end the interview as quickly as possible.

Harris's Agenda

CHRISTIAN MONTERROSA / Contributor | Getty Images

From the beginning of the interview, Harris was hostile. She was immediately adversarial and would spin every question into a criticism of Trump, no matter how pointed Baier's question was. Several times Harris had emotional outbursts, spewing classic anti-Trump rhetoric, regardless of its relevance to the question asked. Glenn pointed out that this was the reason Harris took this interview. Recently, many of her core supporters have been faltering as her sudden burst of televised appearances has revealed her paper-thin platform. She took this interview to get a good clip of her passionately bashing Trump on Fox News. This would bolster her core demographic, which she desperately needs.

Harris's Fumbles

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

Despite her best efforts to sway the interview in her favor, Baier still managed to pin Harris several times. Harris kept dodging tough questions Baier threw her way with the same tactic: she would promise to "follow the law" then deflect the question back on Trump. One of the more memorable instances of Harris's evasion strategy was when she was questioned if she supported prison inmates having access to taxpayer-funded transgender surgery. Harris insisted she would "follow the law" and then explained that Trump had followed the same law while he was in office. This response was, in essence, a non-answer. Harris was ignoring the obvious fact that as President, she would influence what the law would be and how it is enforced.

Harris's other major blunder occurred after Baier asked her how her presidency would differ from Biden's and how she would "turn the page" on our current situation. In classic Harris fashion, she immediately deflects on Trump, framing our current situation as somehow a byproduct of Trump simply existing within the political sphere. This convoluted web she spun was so twisted that Harris herself lost track of what she was saying gave up, telling Baier, "You know what I'm talking about." Baier admitted he was just as lost as she was, and she simply went back to attacking Trump.

POLL: Are your kids eating POISON?!

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

More Americans than ever are sick, life expectancy is falling, and our children are in rough shape... What happened!?!

In his newest TV special, Glenn delves into the toxic garbage that the FDA allows to be put into our food and the devastating effects it has on our bodies. The stats are staggering: nearly one-third of all Americans have at least one chronic disease, almost40 percent of school-aged kids have a chronic disease, and U.S. life expectancy is at a 20-year low and is still plummeting. Not to mention the skyrocketing rates of ADHD and Autism diagnoses in our children.

Why does the FDA allow our food to be poisoned? Glenn unveils that the FDA is owned by the monopolistic food manufacturers that put the products in the food and by Big Pharma which sells the cure. In fact, 46 percent of the FDA's budget is paid for by food manufacturers, and a whopping 6,500 FDA jobs are funded by Big Pharma. On top of that, it's up to the food manufacturers to run tests, gather data about the safety of their food, and present it to the FDA. Seems like a conflict of interest, don't you think?

Glenn wants to know what you think. Do you/your kids eat foods with toxic ingredients such as artificial food dyes? Do you trust the FDA to keep your food safe? Can the system be fixed? Let us know in the poll below:

Do you/your kids eat foods with toxic ingredients such as artificial food dyes?

Do you trust the FDA to keep your food safe?

Could Trump/RFK Jr. fix/replace the FDA?

Can Trump win THESE critical swing states?

Michael M. Santiago / Staff | Getty Images

The election is less than three weeks away! And if you are in a state with early voting, it may be even sooner than that!

Like most elections, the 2024 election victor will be determined largely by whichever candidate can win the most swing states, i.e. states that are nearly split 50/50 Democrat and Republican. If Trump is to win the election, he has to win a majority of the seven swing states, which are: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

In order to keep you informed on how Trump is polling in these seven states, how he did against Biden in 2020 and what issues are important to the voters of each of the states, we compiled the relevant information for your convenance below:

Arizona

Michael M. Santiago / Staff | Getty Images

In 2020 Trump lost Arizona to Biden by just over 10,000 votes, or 0.4 percent of the state.

The border state is up in the air again for 2024 and unsurprisingly immigration and border security is the top issue for voters. After border security, long-term water supplies and education rank at the top of Arizona voter's concerns, with inflation and cost of living coming in at number four.

Polls currently place President Trump ahead of Kamala with 48.4 percent of the votes compared to her 46.8 percent.

Georgia

Kevin Dietsch / Staff | Getty Images

In 2020, Trump lost Georgia to Biden by just over 10,000 votes, or 0.3 percent of the state.

Georgia voters are most concerned with abortion access (for or against), followed by environment, climate change, and the economy.

Polls currently place President Trump ahead of Kamala with 48.7 percent of the votes compared to her 47 percent.

Michigan

Scott Olson / Staff | Getty Images

In 2020 Trump lost Michigan to Biden by approximately 150,000 votes, or 2.8 percent of the state.

In Michigan, like many Americans, voters are most concerned by the economy. The economy is trailed by renewable energy and abortion as top issues for Michigan voters this election.

Polls currently place Kamala Harris ahead of Trump with 47.7 percent of the votes compared to his 46.9 percent.

Nevada

Ethan Miller / Staff | Getty Images

In 2020 Trump lost Nevada to Biden by approximately 30,000 votes, or 2.4 percent of the state.

In Nevada, the top issue is for voters is the economy, which is followed by affordable housing. Following affordable housing, immigration ranks high among concerns of Nevada voters along with democracy and crime.

Polls currently place Kamala Harris ahead of Trump with 47.8 percent of the votes compared to his 47 percent.

North Carolina

Anadolu / Contributor | Getty Images

In 2020 Trump won North Carolina against Biden by over 70,000 votes, or 1.4 percent of the state.

Like in many other state, the economy is the leading issue among voters. The economy and inflation is followed by abortion rights and illegal immigration in top concerns for North Caroling voters.

Polls currently place Donald Trump leading Kamala with 48 percent of the votes compared to her 47.6 percent.

Pennsylvania

JIM WATSON / Contributor | Getty Images

In 2020 Trump lost Pennsylvania to Biden by approximately 80,000 votes, or 1.2 percent of the state.

The people of Pennsylvania are the most concerned with jobs, wages and the economy. Behind the economy, Pennsylvanians are most concerned with the future of democracy, immigration, and gun policy.

Polls currently place Kamala leading Trump with 48.1 percent of the votes compared to his 47.4 percent.

Wisconsin

ALEX WROBLEWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

In 2020 Trump lost Wisconsin to Biden by approximately 40,000 votes, or 0.7 percent of the state.

The primary concern of voters in Wisconsin is the current high cost of living. Behind the cost of living, healthcare and education are high among the concerns of Wisconsinites, with the economy as a whole coming in fourth.

Polls currently place Kamala leading Trump with 48.1 percent of the votes compared to his 47.5 percent.