Glenn talks about a speech that Booker T. Washington gave in 1895 that was a blueprint to his life.
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, recently told Hamas it would NOT enter into the war against Israel and that the terrorist group had not given Iranian officials any prior warning of its attack on October 7th. Hmm…do we REALLY believe that? Because, in reality, Iran has not only been funding Hamas for years, but it has also publicly declared a mission to destroy America — and its allies — ever since it became a theocratic nation decades ago. Iran is willing to use any means possible to complete this goal…nuclear weapons included. But why? Why is there so much hatred against the West and its allies? What’s fueling this goal? In this three-part series, which originally aired in 2011, you’ll learn about the history and the dangerous ideology behind Iran’s every move, the way Democrats and the Obama administration facilitated its progress, and just how close Iran is to its nuclear war goals…
The government and media's January 6th lies are continuing to unravel. Recently, Blaze Media published an exposé into the truth about U.S. Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn's congressional testimony. The media has praised him as a hero who stood up to violent and racist rioters while protecting our lawmakers. And he even wrote a memoir about his experience. But after reviewing the evidence, including the CCTV footage from the day, Blaze Media investigative reporter Steve Baker came to a different conclusion. "The story that first made headlines is now an obviously disprovable lie," Glenn says. Glenn goes through the evidence that Dunn lied in his congressional testimony and the media just went along with it.
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: There is a story today, that is an exclusive, and shows you the kind of investigation work that we are -- are now committing to.
The United States Capitol police officer Harry Dunn, who was celebrated as a hero for his actions on January 6th, has made a public statement since. Earlier this year, President Joe Biden awarded him the presidential citizen's medal. To great fanfare. But the story that first made headlines is now an obviously disprovable lie.
Dunn alleged that he was called the N-word numerous times during the riot at the Capitol on January 6th. Almost the entirety of the media repeated his claim without any question. It features predominantly in his new memoir, new book, Standing My Ground.
A Capitol police officer's fight for accountability, and good trouble after January 6th.
Seemingly, no other word in the English language, when spoken by someone other than a black comedian, or a rapper, evokes more viscerally negative responses.
So taboo is the use of the N-word. That when anyone such as quotes the word in a news story or an interview, it has to be redacted.
In standing my ground, Dunn recounts how he and another black officer was approached by Buzzfeed reporter, a man who felt to tell their stories about that harrowing day, in which they were forced to endure racist abuse, including repeatedly being called the N-word. As they just tried to do the job of protecting the Capitol.
I sat down with one of my buddies, another black guy. And tears just started streaming down my face, he said. I said, what the F, man?
Is this even America?
What the F just happened? I am so sick and tired of this.
Soon he was screaming. So that everyone in the rotunda and his white colleagues, could hear what he had gone through.
He sat through the rotunda, at the end of the day. These are racist ass terrorists, he yelled out the rotunda. I got called the N-word, 15 times today!
Trump did this.
And all these F-ing people in our department that voted for him, how can summit him now? He said, I sat there in the rotunda, and I cried for about 15 minutes.
I just let it out.
Well, he went under oath, to tell this wonderful story.
TheBlaze media has been a -- acquired access to two FBI, 302 interview forms. They're marked unclassified. However, they're under the courts protective order, preventing them from being made public.
But in Dunn's first statement before the Congressional subcommittee on July 27th, he said, I'm a law enforcement officer, and I keep politics out of my job.
But in this circumstance, I responded, well, I voted for Joe Biden. Does my vote not count?
Am I nobody?
That prompted, he said, a torrent of racial epitaphs. A woman in a pink MAGA shirt yelled. You hear that guys. This N-word voted for Joe Biden.
Then the crowd of perhaps 20 people joined in, screaming, boo!
No one had ever, ever called me the N-word while wearing the uniform of a Capitol police officer.
In the days following the attempted insurrection, other black officers shared with me, their own stories of racial abuse on January 6th. One officer told me, he had never in his 40 years of life, been called the N-word to his face.
But that streak ended on January 6th.
On Page 82 of the prepublication copy of Dunn's book acquired by Blaze Media, he gives a similar account of a racist chant from the lady in the pink MAGA shirt.
But on Page 157, Dunn writes, the chant was led by a woman in a pink magazine hat.
Despite that and other minor discrepancies in Dunn's telling, the biggest problem with the story is, that this is the most video recorded event in history. Not a single piece of evidence, video or audio, has even emerged to confirm that such a racially charged incident ever took place.
In the two and a half years since the events. With tens of thousands of hours of audio taken, and analyzed, from open source cell phone video. And DC metro police body-worn cameras. Nobody has produced, recorded evidence to corroborate Dunn's story.
Well, what about the Capitol rotunda, closed-circuit TV video.
Well, Blaze media has analyzed this. It does not include any audio, but the video also appears to lack any visual evidence confirming the event, as Dunn described it.
At the time and location, he claimed it occurred. In fact, the entire tie of the extensive hours of videos, that Blaze media has examined, reveal no such event.
This includes the end of Dunn's day. When he was supposed to have broken down. Crying in the Capitol. Shouting, why!
Instead, he's clearly visible, talking to numerous fellow officers.
But not only without tears, but sometimes smiling, and sharing a cell phone video.
Also, Blaze media did not find a single shirt fitting that description worn by anyone. Inside the building.
Analysts for a Blaze media, who spent hours pouring over the video recordings, looking for any individual, male or female, wearing a pink MAGA shirt, inside the Capitol building.
We can report conclusively, based on the many camera sources available, that a woman in a pink MAGA T-shirt is never seen near or a in Dunn's vicinity.
In fact, Blaze media did not find a single shirt, fitting that description, worn by anyone inside the building.
The sedition hunters, a self-described global community of open source intelligence investigators, working together to assist the US FBI and Washington, DC, Capitol Police. To find those who committed crimes at January 6th at the Capitol.
They had unprecedented access to open source since January 6th video footage. This group of left-leaning activist researchers has also failed to produce evidence of the N-word being used against a Dunn or any other black police officers of that day.
What does that mean? I wonder.
Tonight, at 9 o'clock, I know there's so much going on.
But there's a lot we're missing.
You never let a good crisis go to waste. There's a lot of things that have come out in the last week, week and a half. That hmm.
You may not have seen. Because everyone was too busy talking about something else.
I told you, that we were watching those other hands.
And watch, we have. And we're gag to expose tonight.
What else has -- has been happening, since we were all distracted, with Israel?
What else has come out?
Wait until you hear the update on our pharmaceutical companies. Our government. And COVID.
A lot of stuff just happened to come out.
Huh. At a time when nobody would pay any attention. Huh.
We're paying attention. Tonight, 9:00 p.m. on Blaze TV. Get your subscription now, at BlazeTV.com/Glenn.
Use the promo code Glenn 36, and save. Tonight. 9:00 p.m. Blaze TV.
MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace recently claimed that former president Donald Trump has an "affinity FOR Hitler." But how many times in the past month has this same mainstream media spewed Hamas talking points in the name of exposing Israeli "oppression?" Glenn argues that maybe instead of trying to paint Trump as Hitler 2.0, the media should speak out against the real fascist movements of our time, including Great Britain's embrace of the arguments of eugenics and global progressives' love for public-private partnerships. (Newsflash: Hitler loved these too!)
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Who was it on CNBC. I think it was NBC.
That was talking about, you know, how Donald Trump just loves Hitler.
STU: Oh, this is their new thing.
They're doing it like crazy. They just keep saying. Oh, Trump.
The clip I think I saw which was probably the same one. Was I think Nicole Wallace. Who was supposedly a former Republican.
Saying, look, you know, Trump's typical love of Hitler is expressed out of -- that he's just so stupid, he loves Hitler.
But in reality, it's much worse than that.
And it's like, wait. What previous love of Hitler?
Did I miss a news story or two?
I don't know exactly what that was.
GLENN: His love for Hitler.
STU: It's an interesting thing. Jared Kushner should be alerted, immediately.
GLENN: I know. And the Jewish state.
Wow. He made an amazing deal, for Israel. Moved the -- moved the embassy to Jerusalem. Wow, he's a really bad Hitler.
STU: Legitimately, you can argue, it's his greatest accomplishment as president.
GLENN: Oh, yeah.
STU: What he did in the Middle East.
GLENN: You could argue, was his greatest accomplishment.
So we welcome Pat Gray from Pat Gray Unleashed. Pat, with an exception of I want to put Jews in crematorium, which I could argue they're on that path.
You know, siding with Iran. And siding with the Palestinians.
Who are saying, burn the Jews. Send them to Germany.
Hitler was right. All of these things.
STU: If you're in -- if there's a giant crowd of protesters. Pro Palestinian protesters.
How many steps do you have to take, until you bump into someone, who would say, gas the Jews?
Four? How many steps?
Is it three? Too many.
PAT: It's too many.
STU: It's not a lot.
It's not 80. I will tell you that.
GLENN: No. It's not.
GLENN: So you have that. Where they're flirting with it.
And they keep making this deal. That they hate Hitler.
Which I personally do.
I hate him for.
STU: Not a fan.
GLENN: Yeah. Multiple reasons.
But I don't think they do.
Look at what's happening.
PAT: My gosh, they just found copies of Mein Kampf, on -- in terrorist headquarters in Hamas.
GLENN: Yeah, and it was -- and they were highlighting all the things about the Jews.
PAT: Yeah. Yeah.
GLENN: What are they doing in Britain? What did they do yesterday?
PAT: Britain's high court, essentially gave a death sentence to an eight-month baby girl.
This baby girl had a -- some rare disease, and they couldn't -- they weren't going to treat her anymore. In Britain.
They were like, okay. Let us take her somewhere else.
GLENN: They had the money. Everything.
PAT: Yeah. Italy said, we'll pay for it. We'll bring your baby here.
We will -- we have a new treatment, that is working pretty well. Shows some promise.
And this will give you more time with your baby. It's on us.
Come here. And we'll treat her. Britain's high court said, no. No.
GLENN: Not --
PAT: Not only that. But I'm just -- because we're turning off all of the lifesaving machinery that's on her. She was on life support. They turned it off. And sent her not home, but to some nursing facility.
And so instead of allowing her to die with the family, the family had to go to this nursing facility, and the baby did die right away. Rather than allow her to go to Italy, who was completely willing to cover all of it.
GLENN: So what happened to the Jews?
With Germany, happened after the progressives. The eugenics people. All killed. Babies, and children.
And old people.
And the infirmed. Just like what's happening in Great Britain, and in Canada.
PAT: It was the -- it was the kind thing to do, to allow them to die with dignity.
Really? Is that what you're doing?
GLENN: And that's what they're saying. I don't understand how half the country.
PAT: How about you let the parents decide?
GLENN: You know, you keep saying that your -- you know, you are against Hitler. Okay. So how about not public/private partnerships. Because that's what Hitler did.
STU: Go back and read liberal fascism. Right? Where you will see, the point of that book basically was, outside of the killing all the Jews things, there's a lot of similarities here, between the modern left and the fascists of that day.
But when you look at what's happening with Israel right now and the protests.
And the people in Congress. Who sound an awful lot like the rhetoric of those days from Germany.
Because they are literally echoing the -- they're at the very least propping up and supporting the people who do believe that Hitler did the right thing.
At the very least, they're supporting them. They're repeating their propaganda. They're acting as if they're neutral parties in this.
And reliable narrators of this whole thing.
And, well, you keep saying, I can't believe Trump, he's just like Hitler.
Well, what -- why is that even an insult from you? You seem to like almost all of his policies. Where is the line?
What is the thing that they want to happen. Because I always want to come back to. I always kill the Jews. I don't know.
Recently, I'm questioning that assumption.
PAT: Listen to the rhetoric. The rhetoric coming from the left.
They do have a deep-seated hatred for Jews. They just do.
GLENN: They do. They do.
PAT: It's scary. It's really frightening. From a time, 75 years ago, when we said, never again.
To a time now, already. Where it's kind of fomenting right now.
GLENN: And all of the same.
This is what I said, in 2008. All of the old hatreds that we saw in the 1930s, will come roaring back.
STU: Yeah. You've said that a million times.
What's so strange about it. I don't know. I get so fooled about this assumption. That we pass these things.
Racism was that thing for a while ago. Anti-Semitism was that thing for a while ago.
Thank God we passed that era.
Eugenics was a long time ago. It was a hundred years ago.
Look, it's important to understand it. But it's not here today. Let's make sure we avoid it. But like, these things keep coming back.
Like the old hatreds keep returning over and over again. I don't --
GLENN: It's like the Gods of the copybook headings.
STU: 100 percent.
And it's like I don't understand it.
I don't understand how you can let a baby die, when you have a chance.
PAT: I don't either. I don't either.
STU: And their parents want them to live.
STU: Every little bump you could come up with. Every argument to say, well, sorry, we have to kill the kid, because it will cost us $12. All right. The $12 is paid for. Now, what? And still the baby dies. Why?
GLENN: It's a culture of death. That's the only thing I can come up -- it's evil. And it's a culture of death. And I can't -- I mean, because of what's happening in the Middle East.
I keep coming back. What was God's commandment to his chosen people?
As they're getting into the Promised Land. What does he say to them?
PAT: Live long and prosper. Wait. Maybe that's -- am I messing up --
GLENN: He said, choose life. Choose life.
And that makes so much sense.
In a way that it's never made sense to me before.
You know, of course, we choose life.
I've always -- of course we choose life. Yeah, we choose life. We're America, we choose life.
Okay. The abortion thing.
But look at, every single thing, that is being pushed is death.
GLENN: It is all death.
PAT: It's a death cult. The left is a death cult.
GLENN: All the way down to the -- the -- going in and mutilating our children.
That is -- that ends in that line, dying.
Because you cannot have children.
So it's dead. That line is dead.
STU: Not to mention, they call it dead naming.
When you change, you're basically killing off the person that you were. For this new person. I was going to say, new and improved.
But I was going to say, it wasn't an improvement.
But the new and improved version of you. You're not allowed to mention Bruce Jenner anymore.
It really is -- you get down these roads. And it's like, where?
Where? What's the other explanation? Other than, just these people are bad people who like bad things?
GLENN: They are. They are.
STU: I don't know.
GLENN: To quote Hillary Clinton, they are early 20th century progressives. This -- they did all of these same things.
PAT: That's never been as true as it is now.
GLENN: They did all these same things. They were sterilizing people. They were silencing people. They were putting you in jail, for your political opinion.
All of that stuff, is that an early 20th century, American progressive. And that's who they are.
Period. That's who they are.
The circumstances surrounding the wars between Ukraine and Russia and Israel and Hamas are very odd, Glenn says. Why has NATO been so open about its plans to eventually invite Ukraine into its alliance? Why did the Biden administration free up $6 billion for Iran? Glenn war games a possible scenario: Has this all been a plan to avoid a 3-front war once China invades Taiwan? But while Glenn finds the scenario interesting, he says that there's one reason he doesn't believe it: "We're evil enough to do it, but I don't think we're smart enough."
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Okay. Let's go back to our premise here.
And this is a very hopeful premise.
Remember, as a -- an action adventure fiction writer, if you had to figure out what the heck was going on in the world, and you didn't know that it was just progressives. Early 20th century progressives. That, again, for some strange reason, hate the Jews. And love eugenics.
You might say, well, wait a minute. What have we learned in the last few years?
We have learned that we cannot take on China, with Taiwan.
We can't do that in peacetime. Okay?
There's no way to do that. We are not prepared to do that.
It's too far away from our bases et cetera, et cetera. We also found the endless wars are draining.
And we certainly could not take on three fronts.
Because you know the Middle East will be on fire. You know that Russia would get involved.
And China, we would be fighting. So we can't do three fronts.
So if you are really, really sharp, and you love America.
And you believed what everybody was saying. And you knew we couldn't let Taiwan go. Because we won't be able to make the supercomputer chips, because Taiwan has the clean rooms and the highest quality to make all of the super computer chips.
We don't make them, but Taiwan does.
We can't lose Taiwan. Okay. What do you do?
You look at the -- you look at everything, and you say, okay. China's economy is failing.
They're close. But they just upped their spending with the Navy.
Et cetera, et cetera.
And everybody knows, this is going to happen.
So you think, okay. How can we do this?
Hear me out on this.
You pick Iran, because Iran can get involved.
They want to defeat America.
They continue to sell oil to China.
China imports about 70 percent of its energy supplies.
Much of it is from Iran. Via sanctions and illegal oil sales.
Plus, China might promise to help Iran finish their nuclear bomb.
Then you have Russia, the other ally, that we would worry about.
There's a chance, they want to weaken America.
In fact, a very good chance. And level the playing field. They need to level the playing field, especially against our aircraft carriers. And they need to also keep selling oil to Europe. And to China.
That's just the China is about half their GDP.
Now, if you war it became this. When the US goes to war with China, we lose.
But we also have to fight Russia and Europe and Iran and the Middle East.
Those are three theaters of war. We can't handle that.
What if Iran and Russia, could not come in on China's side in three years down the road.
Everybody looks at you, you're sitting there, in the briefing room, and you say, hear me out. What if Russia and Iran had already been taken out? What if they've already been neutralized before we had to fight China?
Everybody looks at you, like you have lobsters growing out of your ears.
We don't have any political support here in the US for wars with Russia and Iran, especially in this election cycle. No way Congress would approve this. The administration won't approve that. The American people wouldn't support it. You say, proxies.
We don't have to fight Russia and Iran.
We get proxies to take them out for us.
All they need is a little push.
And a ton of weapons. Just the right motivation, and they'll take them out for us.
The room gets silent. And you're sitting there and you say, so who is dumb enough to fight two land wars in Asia.
You smile and say, well, NATO.
NATO can take out Russia. Israel can take out Iran.
You have to do it just right. NATO and Israel could never know we are using them like that. We can't just go out there and bribe them. They have to be so motivated to risk their own survival and beef up their own military budgets to take Putin and the ayatollahs out for us. We supply the weapons.
They do the fighting.
Everybody is in on the great game, all of a sudden.
The trick is, we have to get Russia to invade. How do we do that?
Why don't we just say, Ukraine is going to be part of NATO?
That's been a red lane forever. Everybody knows that. They'll feel threatened. Putin invades Ukraine. NATO will come to the rescue with guns and money. Ukraine does the dirty work, but we make sure they have enough to win. Yeah, but Israel. Well, Israel will need to be attacked. And much worse than ever before.
Why don't we just release all of the funds, to Iran?
So they have all of the money, to plan an attack on Israel, that is so large and so heinous, that they'll be forced to use their own military it take them out.
Which will then force Iran to join in, and then Israel takes them out. We just need the weapons, guys.
Because we need the weapons in three years. When we're going after -- when we're going after China. And all of our weapons are outdated and old.
We need a whole new generation, but we have all of these weapons sitting here.
And there's no way, we can -- with cost overruns. You know, with -- with everything that comes with giant military production.
How are you going to get the American people to do it?
Well, we'll just tell them the truth. We're out of armaments. And then we will have to rebuild our army. Maybe we could even convince China in the end, if Russia and Iran falls, they have no real allies. They'll take Taiwan.
I think the only reason why I don't believe this is because I -- I mean, we're evil enough to do it. But I don't believe it. Because I don't think we're smart enough to do it.
I don't just there's enough, hey, we all love America here. Let's do. You know what I mean?
GLENN: There's the evil generals and the war planners and everything. I think there's enough of those in Washington. You know, the Lindsey Grahams that are like, yeah. We got to get them. At any cost, we get them. I think those guys exist.
STU: There's a lot of that type of stuff that you were talking about there, where you throw things out like, well, then Israel will take out Iran.
Think of what that looks like. These little assumptions millions of people dead.
GLENN: This is the way the elites always do.
They did it in World War I, World War II.
STU: Yeah, no, it's realtime strategies. Those old games, where you used to drag your troops around, and you have them attack the little base. Then you rebuild.
You wouldn't think about the little guys that are going in there and dying. That's the way it is thought about.
GLENN: I thought of this. I'm reading a book. Or I was reading a book on JFK. I can't remember the name of it.
It was the JFK assassination. And it's just documenting how many people hated him.
They hated him. The military, CIA, he really had a problem with those guys.
Just like Donald Trump.
Really had a problem with those guys. And he did not like the way we were fighting the Cold War. And he's like, we are not going to keep escalating this war.
And one of the generals, I can't remember his name, but he was in charge of -- maybe NATO strategy. Or he was -- he was big.
And he absolutely believed that thermonuclear war was inevitable. And he was pushing hard.
Launch first. Launch right now. It's inevitable.
So launch now. They'll never see it coming. We can take them out. Launch now. This is not Cuban Missile Crisis time.
This is, when he first gets into office. Launch. And he actually goes around Kennedy's back, and is calling him weak for not doing this.
It was a legitimate campaign inside the pentagon. To just launch our missiles.
Did you know that?
STU: I -- I think maybe you've told it to me. Or I've heard it maybe once.
But it's -- it's impossible to believe. And, of course, these people -- there's always somebody like that. I guarantee, you think it's bad here. How many people are doing that in Russia right now? How many people are going behind Vladimir Putin's back, and saying, hey. Like this guy wouldn't even fire the nukes.
They're giving weapons to Ukraine. They're killing our people.
How is he not firing these things.
There is a huge faction inside of Russia. Who is pushing that hard line approach. And God forbid one of them wins an argument one day over vodkas, God only knows what happens.
GLENN: Wait until you see what we will show you tonight about Russia and Iran. And about what they're actually doing and saying to one another. And the language they're sharing with one another. It is spooky. It is really -- they are -- they are serious. They are serious.
STU: Yeah. Yeah. So this is the -- this is the biggest worry, right? There's just this instability everywhere right now. It's instability, combined with a bunch of really incompetent people, who don't know what they're doing and don't know how to manage this sort of instability, at the helm here in America.
And you, of course, have, I mean, our share of instability has been well-documented here over the past few weeks, especially.
So you put all that together. And like, it's just -- at some point, you wonder if it will all spiral out of control.
GLENN: So let me ask you: Have you ever seen our government pay for hostages.
I think the only time we did it was the Iran-contra thing, right?
STU: I mean, off the top of my head, I mean, that one pops to mind.
GLENN: So we had that one.
But we paid. Didn't we pay the Contras? And they brokered the deal.
So we weren't really paying Iran. We were paying the revolutionaries in South America.
STU: And they would kind of say the same thing now. Right?
They would kind of say, well, we're not really paying for hostages.
STU: In this program, and these dollars are going -- they always have some way of getting around it technically.
GLENN: Yes. Have we ever -- have we ever rewarded a terrorist state? Like another -- I don't even know, I keep seeing reports that say billion, and million. And no money from the government ever seems like real money. So I have no idea, but I think it's $10 billion.
And we released it yesterday. The State Department did. And they said, well, it's because it's for medical stuff.
STU: Yeah. What was their excuse? Well, there will have to be terrorism anyway. They will find terror no matter what, so you might as well give them an extra 10 billion. They really said.
GLENN: They really did.
STU: They're going to do this anyway, so it doesn't matter if we give them a bunch of extra money.
GLENN: What world does that make sense?
STU: Well, Jeffrey Dahmer is going to kill Laotian teenagers anyway, so we sent him over a bundt cake. Like, what are you talking about? That's not a good argument.
GLENN: He's not going want a bundt cake. I've been pushing for the extra double-sized refrigerator/freezer. Bundt cake!
STU: I just feel like, that's not a good idea. Well, you know these people are really bad actors. So therefore, the reward isn't going to incentivize more bad acting. So let's give them the reward. What -- that's not a good argument.
GLENN: And you don't use that in anything.
STU: No. It would be a terrible, terrible thing to do. And it is. And, of course, we all know, as the Iranians last time we did this.
Pointed out to us. This money is fungible, it will go wherever we want it to go.
GLENN: They told us that!
STU: They said it publicly.
GLENN: Like they will give their people medicine.
STU: Oh, that's a huge concern for them. They're really worried. Oh, gosh. Do we have enough Robitussin for the population? I don't know.
GLENN: Their God says, wipe out Israel, bring the Madhi (phonetic) back. And we'll start the end of the world war.
That's our top -- God is telling us that. Yeah, but we don't have enough Robitussin.
STU: Yeah. I know. That's not the concern for them.
GLENN: No, I don't think so. I don't think so.