3 gay conservatives reveal what pride month is REALLY about

We are well into Pride Month 2023. It seems like every year, the push from the Left and the "Rainbow Mafia" grows stronger and more obscene. Meanwhile, some Americans have expressed frustration at being sidelined. This includes members of the "LGBTQIA+" community who are very unhappy about being lumped in with the militant "Rainbow Mafia," and who have been speaking against this forced association.

In his recent Glenn TV Friday Exclusive, Pride Propaganda, Glenn questioned, "Aren't there any gay people that are really bothered by this?" As it turns out yes, yes there are. Here is what three gay, VERY bothered, conservatives have to say:

Dave Rubin

Michael S. Schwartz / Contributor

Let's start with Dave Rubin, host of The Rubin Report, who is well known for many things, the least of which is being a gay conservative (much to the dismay and confusion of the "Rainbow Mafia"). During a guest appearance on Glenn's show, Rubin discussed the Left's conflation of sexual orientation and ideology. Here's what he said:

They've separated human beings based on ideology having nothing to do with who they truly are.

The Left has presented simply "being gay" as an ideological stance that is incompatible with and even despised by other (typically right-leaning) ideologies. They frame being gay as meaning you have to be a part of the Rainbow Mafia—you have to believe what they believe or you are "not really gay." Rubin pointed out the problem with being defined by only one aspect of yourself, like your sexuality, saying:

You're not a free human being, you're actually a slave.

Spencer Klavan

In Glenn's most recent podcast, he interviewed Spencer Klavan, author and Oxford Ph.D., on how Christians should fight back against the Rainbow Mafia. Klavan brought up an important point:

The loudest and the craziest voices are [the most] visible.

The Rainbow Mafia types are made out to be the majority—the unanimous voice of anyone in the LGBTQIA+ community—which conveniently means they can weaponize criticism towards them by labeling critics as homophobes. But in reality, many critics of the Rainbow Mafia are gay, including Klavan. In fact, Klavan mentioned that he:

[Speaks] every day to people that are just horrified by what's being done in their name.

Don't let the Left conflate one's sexual identity with being part of the Rainbow Mafia. Don't let them label the resistance to child mutilation and the forced adoption of gender ideology as "homophobic." As Klavan encouraged:

Stand up and say "not in my name."

Douglas Murray

Simone Padovani/Awakening / Contributor

Douglas Murray is a British political commentator and author of the New York Times bestselling book, The Madness of Crowds, which takes on woke-culture head-on. Murray appeared in an interview with former Australian politician, John Anderson, where they discussed the incoherence of the existence of the LGBTQIA+ community. Murray asked the question:

Why would we be taking the individualism out of individuals and lumping them in these demonstrably incoherent bodies that don't even exist?

Good point. Why should we believe that people who happen to be gay all somehow fit neatly into a box? This method of categorization reduces an individual to one aspect of their identity, which is blatantly divisive, accentuating the minor differences between people rather than things held in common.

As demonstrated by these three quotes, there’s more to pride month than what rabid leftists and the mainstream media make it out to be. As Glenn explained on Glenn TV, pride month is not about gay rights or advocacy, it's a concept that been hijacked for money and political power.

"[Companies] are being held hostage by extremists and Wall Street," Glenn said. "Wall Street is looking for ESG scores, extremists are like 'you don't say gay, enough you don't celebrate transgender, well we're going to have to give you a low score.'"

This creates a monetary incentive for big corporations to reinforce the Left's crazy identity politics and treat "the gay community" as a monolith, instead of individuals. It is clear that real the objective here is to bind the so-called "gay community" as a political tool to be used by the Left.

COVID is back! Or that is what we’re being told anyway...

A recent spike in COVID cases has triggered the left's alarm bells, and the following institutions have begun to reinstate COVID-era mandates. You might want to avoid them if you enjoy breathing freely...

Do YOU think institutions should bring back COVID-era mandates if cases increase? Let us know your thoughts HERE.

Morris Brown College

Both of Upstate Medical's hospitals in Syracuse, New York

Corey Henry / Senior Staff Photographer | The Daily Orange

Auburn Community Hospital, New York

Kevin Rivoli / The Citizen | Auburn Pub

Lionsgate Studio

AaronP/Bauer-Griffin / Contributor | GETTY IMAGES

United Health Services in New York

Kaiser Permanente in California

Justin Sullivan / Staff | GETTY IMAGES

There was a time when both the Left and the Right agreed that parents have the final say in raising their children... Not anymore.

In the People's Republic of California, the STATE, not parents, will determine whether children should undergo transgender treatments. The California state legislature just passed a law that will require judges in child custody cases to consider whether parents support a child’s gender transition. According to the law, the state now thinks total affirmation is an integral part of a child’s “health, safety, and welfare.”

We are inching closer to a dystopia where the state, not the parents, have ultimate rights over their children, a history that people from former Soviet nations would feign repeating.

Glenn dove into the law AND MORE in this episode titled, "Parental Advisory: The EXPLICIT plot to control YOUR kids." To get all the research that went into this episode AND information on how YOU can fight back, enter your email address below:

If you didn't catch Wednesday night's Glenn TV special, be sure to check it out HERE!

The Biden admin has let in MORE illegal aliens than the populations of THESE 15 states

GUILLERMO ARIAS / Contributor | Getty Images

There are currently an estimated 16.8 MILLION illegal aliens residing in the United States as of June 2023, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). This number is already 1.3 million higher than FAIR's January 2022 estimate of 15.5 million and a 2.3 million increase from its end-of-2020 estimate. Even Democrats like New York City's Mayor Adams Mayor Adams are waking up to what Conservatives have been warning for years: we are in a border CRISIS.

However, this isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010. In the first two years of the Biden administration alone, the illegal alien population increased by 16 PERCENT nationwide, imposing a whopping net cost of $150.6 BILLION PER YEAR on American taxpayers. That is nearly DOUBLE the total amount that the Biden administration has sent to Ukraine.

This isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010.

These large numbers often make it difficult to conceptualize the sheer impact of illegal immigration on the United States. To put it in perspective, we have listed ALL 15 states and the District of Colombia that have smaller populations than the 2.3 MILLION illegal immigrants, who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration. That is more than the entire populations of Wyoming, Vermont, and South Dakota COMBINED—and the American taxpayers have to pay the price.

Here are all 16 states/districts that have FEWER people than the illegal immigrants who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration.

1. New Mexico

Population: 2,110,011

2. Idaho

Population: 1,973,752

3. Nebraska

Population: 1,972,292

4. West Virginia

Population: 1,764,786

5. Hawaii

Population: 1,433,238

6. New Hampshire

Population: 1,402,957

7. Maine

Population: 1,393,442

8. Montana

Population: 1,139,507

9. Rhode Island

Population: 1,090,483

10. Delaware

Population: 1,031,985

11. South Dakota

Population: 923,484

12. North Dakota

Population: 780,588

13. Alaska

Population: 732,984

14. Washington DC

Population: 674,815

15. Vermont

Population: 647,156

16. Wyoming

Population: 583,279

POLL: Should the Government control the future of AI?

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

Earlier this week, tech titans, lawmakers, and union leaders met on Capitol Hill to discuss the future of AI regulation. The three-hour meeting boasted an impressive roster of tech leaders including, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and others, along with more than 60 US Senators.

Tech Titans and Senators gathered in the Kennedy Caucus Room.The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

The meeting was closed to the public, so what was exactly discussed is unknown. However, what we do know is that a majority of the CEOs support AI regulation, the most vocal of which is Elon Musk. During the meeting, Musk called AI "a double-edged sword" and strongly pushed for regulation in the interest of public safety.

A majority of the CEOs support AI regulation.

Many other related issues were discussed, including the disruption AI has caused to the job market. As Glenn has discussed on his program, the potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real, and many have already felt the effects. From taxi drivers to Hollywood actors and writers, AI's presence can be felt everywhere and lawmakers are unsure how to respond.

The potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real.

Ultimately, the meeting's conclusion was less than decisive, with several Senators making comments to the tune of "we need more time before we act." The White House is expected to release an executive order regarding AI regulation by the end of the year. But now it's YOUR turn to tell us what YOU think needs to be done!

Should A.I. be regulated?

Can the government be trusted with the power to regulate A.I.? 

Can Silicon Valley be trusted to regulate AI? 

Should AI development be slowed for safety, despite its potential advantages?

If a job can be done cheaper and better by AI, should it be taken away from a human?

Do you feel that your job is threatened by AI?