TOP SECRET LEAK? Here are the TOP 7 things you NEED to know about the Pentagon classified documents leak.

Anadolu Agency / Contributor, USAF / Handout | Getty Images

The breaking news story over the weekend was the alleged Pentagon leak of classified documents containing "TOP SECRET" U.S. intelligence about Ukraine and other foreign operations. Are the documents genuine? What do they actually contain? As Glenn said on radio Monday, "We don't know." Regardless of whether the documents are fabricated or genuine, there will be major ramifications from the leak.

In the craziness of the news cycle, it can be difficult to stay on top of this particular story. Below, you will find the seven things you NEED to know about the leaked document story, from the content of the documents to why you should care about the leak at all.

How were the classified documents first discovered?

The classified documents were originally published on Discord, an online messaging forum, often used for video gaming.

SOPA Images / Contributor

The classified documents were first published on a Discord channel in March. The posts included pictures of the documents, rather than a PDF of the documents themselves, indicating the publisher obtained physical copies. The posts were public for several weeks before being detected. The New York Times was the first publication to shed light on the documents.

What documents were leaked?

General Milley, is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

The leaked documents appear to consist of briefing slides prepared by the U.S. military’s Joint Staff between February and March 2023. This has been confirmed by NBC, NPR, the New York Times, and all other media outlets that received access to the documents. There are only several dozen leaked documents, much less than Edward Snowden's several-thousand-document leak in 2013.

The briefing slides include information gleaned from an array of U.S. intelligence agencies, such as the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office, which oversees U.S. spy satellites. Some of the documents carry the label NOFORN, which prohibits the information from being shared with foreign partners. Many of the documents are labeled as "Top Secret," the highest level of confidentiality.

What's in the documents?

Ukrainian army volunteers pose on Driver Tank Trainers.

Leon Neal / Staff | Getty Images

Some of the documents include details about the war in Ukraine, such as maps of Ukraine, charts on where troops are concentrated, and what kinds of weapons are available to them. One page labeled "Top Secret" is titled "Status of the Conflict as of 1 March" and contains a detailed battlefield summary on that particular day. It's not clear why those particular documents are emerging now more than a month after they were prepared.

The documents also repeatedly reference information based on secret signals intelligence, also called, "electronic eavesdropping," which is a vital pillar of U.S. intelligence-gathering.

The documents also repeatedly reference information based on secret signals intelligence

According to NBC, a former U.S. intelligence official said the now-published documents could cause significant damage to U.S. intelligence if Moscow is now able to cut off the sources used for electronic eavesdropping.

What other intelligence was breached?

Putin greets Turkish President Erdogan. According to the leaked documents, Russia aims to buy weapons from Turkey, a NATO member.

Anadolu Agency / Contributor | Getty Images

Below are key highlights of the "Top Secret" U.S. intelligence referenced in the documents, per NBC, which had access to 50 of the documents:

1. Russia’s private mercenary organization, the Wagner Group, seeks to purchase weapons from NATO member Turkey. The group is also considering recruiting additional convicts to fight against Ukraine.

2. Several documents include satellite imagery of damage to Russian targets from Ukrainian strikes in February, including an “assembly area” which caused “severe damage." The strikes were carried out with the help of U.S. intelligence, according to the document. If true, Russia could interpret the information as a direct act of war by the U.S.

The strikes were carried out with the help of U.S. intelligence.

3. According to multiple intelligence sources, the battle for Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region will likely be “stalemate” through 2023 in order to exhaust Russian units.

4. A document marked “secret” says Ukrainian bombs equipped with U.S. guidance systems, known as Joint Direct Attack Munitions, or JDAMs, have failed recently. They attribute this to bomb fuses failing to arm themselves correctly and GPS signal issues. It also speculates that Russian jamming efforts could be at play.

5. A Feb. 28 document assesses “pathways” for Israel, who is currently neutral in regard to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, to provide “lethal aid” to Ukraine. These "pathways" might be more accurately described as hypothetical scenarios to explore how the U.S. can manipulate international events to pressure Israel into supplying aid to Ukraine.

These "pathways" ... explore how the U.S. can manipulate international events to pressure Israel.

6. More intelligence cited in the documents says South Korea has concerns about providing artillery shells to the U.S. to replenish America’s supplies, which are critically depleted.

7. Finally, the intelligence cited says Israel's Mossad intelligence agency encouraged its staff to take part in anti-government protests that have swept Israel, which Israel has since vehemently denied.

Are the documents genuine?

Ukrainian President Zelensky accuses Russia of being involved with the Pentagon leak.

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Military analysts say the documents appear genuine. However, there is speculation that the original versions were likely altered in some places, causing suspicion of outside interference.

For example, one chart in the briefing says the Ukrainian death toll is around 71,000, a figure that is considered plausible. However, the same chart also lists the Russian fatalities at 16,000 to 17,500, which is believed to be much higher.

Though neither side has released their overall casualty figures, some suspect that someone has interfered with the original document to minimize the Russian death toll. Ukraine says Russia is involved, aiming to make their death toll appear smaller and, consequently, their war effort to appear stronger than it actually is.

Some suspect that someone has interfered with the original document to minimize the Russian death toll.

Moreover, the chart with the death toll allegedly is printed on a black background, while all other charts on the same slide are printed on a white background, raising more suspicions of interference. It's not yet clear how valuable the information is to the Russian military.

Who published the documents?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

It is not yet known who published the documents and how they acquired them. The two most likely scenarios are that the documents were leaked from the Pentagon or stolen. If they were leaked, it would be one of the most significant intelligence leaks in U.S. history. Though some speculate that Russia is involved, there is no conclusive evidence.

Why does the leak matter?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

This leak has major consequences regardless of whether Russia is involved or not. If the documents are genuine, then that could mean Russia and our enemies have accurate intel on the U.S.'s intelligence acquisition tactics. Moreover, the documents contain damning evidence of the U.S.'s direct involvement in Ukraine's front against Russia, which Russia could interpret as an act of war. Will they retaliate?

If the documents are indeed fabricated by Russia, then that could mean Russia is attempting to frame the U.S. with justifiable cause for Russia to declare war. Moreover, it bolsters the appearance of Russia's war effort and weakens the U.S.'s international standing—both with its allies and its enemies.

Do YOU believe aliens exist? According to our poll, most of you say YES. However, even more of you believe that the government is using the alien whistleblowers to distract us from other pressing stories, like Hunter Biden's illicit business dealings.

So which is the case? If the whistleblower reports are legitimate, then this could be one of the most groundbreaking stories in American history. If not, it could be one of the biggest PSY-OPS the government has ever attempted to distract the American people from what they do NOT want them to see.

On last night's Glenn TV special, "Are Aliens & UFOs a Government Psyop?" Glenn dove into BOTH sides and went through the history of UFO whistleblowers in our country's history—yes, there are many. This is the BALANCED and INFORMED take on the UFO whistleblowers that you WON'T get in the mainstream news cycle.

Do your own homework

Enter your email below to get the EXCLUSIVE research documents, including all of the references and resources Glenn used in last night's Glenn TV special.

If you missed it, be sure to watch the full episode below!

Is the New York Times COOKING THE BOOKS against 'Dark Future'?

Gary Hershorn / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn's new book, 'Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset's Terrifying Next Phase' remains strong on the New York Times Bestseller List a month after its publication... but should it be ranked higher?

Currently, 'Dark Future' is ranked No.13. on the New York Times Bestselling Non-Fiction list. However, if the list were determined by raw sales alone, 'Dark Future' would have been ranked number SEVEN on the list. Moreover, while Greg Gutfeld's new book, 'The King of Late Night,' has fewer sales than 'Dark Future,' it continues to outrank 'Dark Future,' in the No. 5 slot.

And things get even fishier.

The current New York Times Bestselling nonfiction list excludes several books that outperform the top rankers on the list. For example, Granger Smith's faith-based nonfiction book, 'Like a River,' is excluded from the list, even though it has received nearly TWICE as many sales as the list's No. 1 spot, 'Outlive' by Dr. Peter Attia. Moreover, Chadwick Moore's new biography of Tucker Carlson, which he recently discussed on the Glenn Beck Program, is also excluded from the list, even though it would have outranked Gutfield's 'The King of Late Night' as well.

Several books are excluded that outperform the top rankers on the list.

Could the New York Timespurposefully be excluding and de-ranking books that don't fit their political agenda? This wouldn't be the first time the New York Times has been accused of "cooking the books."

Legendary author James Patterson, who holds the Guinness World Record for the most #1 New York Times bestsellers, recently criticized the list as "inaccurate." Patterson recounted how his recently published book, 'Walk The Blue Line,' which recounted real-life stories of law enforcement officers, wasn't even on the New York Times Bestseller List for the first week after publication, despite its sales outperforming its competitors. Once it was on the list, it continued to rank below books it had significantly outperformed.

This wouldn't be the first time that the New York Times has been accused of "cooking the books."

Patterson took to Twitter (now called X), to post his Letter to the Editor after the New York Times refused to publish it, calling out the double standard in their ranking system.

In response, the Times responded:

Our bestsellers lists are based on detailed analysis of book sales from a wide range of retailers, tens of thousands of brick-and-mortar stores of all sizes, and numerous online book-selling vendors to best represent what is selling across the United States.

However, Patterson hit the nail on the head: "If you don't base it on raw sales, you base it on cooked sales."

Is 'Dark Future,' and the other aforementioned books suffering from the same double standard that Patterson described? The raw sale numbers certainly indicate so. However, the fact that 'Dark Future' continues to rank on the list is a testimony to the book's success and the power of its scathing message against the world's elites.

If you haven't yet ordered Dark Future, click HERE to get your copy and see what all the hype is about. Not a reader? Click HERE to download the Dark Future audiobook, read by Glenn himself, which was ranked in the AP's Top 10 Audiobook List.

POLL: Do aliens EXIST? Or is it just a PSYOP?

Rastan | Getty Images

The nation was taken aback this year when whistleblower David Charles Gorusch, a decorated Air Force veteran, claimed the Department of Defense has a secret team aimed at "retrieving non-human origin technical vehicles, call it spacecraft if you will, non-human exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or crashed."

Talk about UFOs and aliens has typically been siloed to the realm of sci-fi and "conspiracy theories." However, in recent years, publicized evidence of UFOs and whistleblowers, like David Grusch, have brought the once fantastical subjects into the mainstream. Could it be that alien life forms do, in fact, exist? Have they already arrived and been kept secret underneath the government's nose? Or could this all be a ruse to distract us from more pressing stories in the news cycle?

Tomorrow's Glenn TV special will be all about ALIENS. Do they actually exist? Or is the topic a huge "psyop" to distract us from important issues...like Joe Biden's illicit business dealings?

We posted this poll earlier this year after David Gorsuch's bombshell testimony. Has YOUR opinion changed? Let us know in the poll below, and be sure to tune into TOMORROW'S Glenn TV special all about ALIENS.

Do you believe the government has intel about UFOs?

Do you believe the government has intel about alien life?

Do you believe the government is hiding this intel from the general public?

Do you believe alien life exists? 

Do you think the media is using this story to distract us from other issues?

The COMPLETE list of ALL Congress members 80 years and OLDER. Should we care?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images, Drew Angerer / Staff | Getty Images

The aging population of our Congress has become a trending news topic.

Last month 90-year-old Senator Feinstein had to be told what to say during a vote by one of her aides after a nearly two-month medical leave of absence with shingles. More recently, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell had a concerning mental episode while giving a routine press briefing. Not to mention Joe Biden's relentless gaffes. As Glenn said this week, keeping these health-compromised elderly individuals in power is "elder abuse" and just plain "cruel."

Keeping health-compromised, elderly individuals in power is "elder abuse."

Both of these leaders are over 80, and their recent episodes have sparked many to ask: how old is "too old" to serve in Congress? This topic is a delicate one. However, the American people should be able to discuss whether age plays a factor in their representatives' and Senators' ability to carry out their duties in the best interest of their constituents.

How old is "too old" to serve in Congress?

There are 20 Congressmen and women who are 80 years old and older, some of which were born before World War II. There are many more who are on the cusp of 80, well past the normal age of retirement. Below you will find the complete list of ALL 20 Congressmen and women who are 80 and over. Do YOU think age should be a factor in determining your vote? Let us know in the comments below.

Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA-D): 90 years old

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 6/22/33

Senator Charles Grassley (IA-R): 89 years old

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 9/17/33

Rep. Grace Napolitano (CA-D): 86 years old

PATRICK T. FALLON / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 12/04/36

Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (AL-D): 86 years old

Win McNamee / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 06/13/37

Rep. Harold Rogers (KY-R): 85 years old

Bill Clark / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 12/31/37

Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (NJ-D): 86 years old

Bill Clark / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 01/25/37

Rep. Maxine Waters (CA-D): 84 years old

Chip Somodevilla / Staff |Getty Images

DOB: 8/15/38

Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (MD-D): 84 years old

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 06/14/39

Rep. James E. Clyburn (SC-D): 83 years old

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 07/21/40

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): 83 years old

Rob Carr / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 03/26/40

Senator Bernie Sanders (VT-I): 81 years old

Alex Wong / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 9/08/41

Rep. Danny K. Davis (IL-D): 81 years old

Kris Connor / Stringer | Getty Images

DOB: 09/06/41

Rep. John Carter (TX-R): 81 years old

Bill Clark / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 11/06/41

Senator Mitch McConnell (KY-R): 81 years old

Drew Angerer / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 02/20/42

Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA): 80 years old

Scott J. Ferrell / Contributor | Getty Images (2011)

DOB: 12/13/42

Rep. Frederica S. Wilson (D-CA): 80 years old

Joe Skipper / Stringer | Getty Images

DOB: 11/05/42

Senator Jim Risch (R-ID): 80 years old

Pool / Pool | Getty Images

DOB: 05/03/2023

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT): 80 years old

Tom Williams / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 03/02/43

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC): 80 years old

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

DOB: 06/29/43

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX): 80 years old

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

DOB: 01/18/43