Glenn: The senate confirmation hearings reek of hypocrisy and corruption

Kevin Dietsch / Staff | Getty Images

These old tricks don't work any more.

During the 2024 campaign, the left tirelessly decried Donald Trump as a “threat to democracy” and a danger to the “rule of law.” But as we watch the spectacle unfolding in these so-called confirmation hearings, it becomes increasingly difficult to ignore the glaring hypocrisy of those same voices. Where is the outrage now? Where are the cries about the erosion of democracy, the disregard for the rule of law, or the misuse of government institutions for political gain? The disgraceful behavior we've witnessed in these hearings is a betrayal of the very principles these lawmakers claim to champion.

The smears, the leaks, the media hit jobs, the fake outrage — they’ve played that hand too many times.

Bernie Sanders railed against … baby onesies

America is teetering on the edge of war, facing an economic free fall, and witnessing the weaponization of the very institutions politicians like Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — America’s favorite millionaire socialist — claim to protect. Yet in this critical moment in our country, Sanders railed against baby onesies.

Antivaxx. Baby. Onesies.

Do you take your job seriously if that’s how you conduct yourself when questioning the nominee to head the Department of Health and Human Services? As a so-called champion of lowering health care costs and issues actually plaguing the American people?

However, when RFK Jr. had the unmitigated gall to point out that Sanders is the single largest recipient of pharmaceutical money in the Senate, Sanders didn’t deny it. Instead, he did what they all do:

  • He tried to silence him.
  • He attempted to dismiss him.
  • He worked to discredit him.

This is the same Bernie Sanders who has spent decades railing against corporate greed, but when the money flows his way, he suddenly has nothing to say.

The hypocrisy during Kash Patel’s hearing was nauseating

Then there's Kash Patel. He's been accused — without a shred of evidence — of planning to weaponize the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. But by whom? By the very same senators who’ve spent the last 26 years doing exactly that. These are the same people who oversaw raids on journalists, spied on sitting presidents, suppressed political opponents, and imprisoned pro-life activists while violent rioters roamed free.

And yet these people have the audacity to act outraged about the politicization of law enforcement? The hypocrisy is so thick that it’s nearly suffocating.

Tulsi Gabbard was smeared as a ‘Russian asset’

When Tulsi Gabbard finally had the chance to speak, she laid it out plainly: Corruption within our intelligence community is not a theory — it's a fact. Yet instead of responding to her legitimate accusations, they smeared her as a Russian asset, a traitor, a spy for Syria. These people are so desperate to maintain their grip on power that they will destroy anyone who dares to expose them.

They asked her whether Edward Snowden was a traitor, but they weren’t interested in the answer. The truth is too dangerous for them: that Snowden should never have had to blow the whistle, because this very committee — these very senators — should have done their jobs and stopped unconstitutional surveillance programs before they even began.

These are the same people who oversaw the FBI’s lies to the American people about the Hunter Biden laptop — proof that the sitting president and his family took tens of millions of dollars from foreign adversaries, including China, the same government that now threatens Taiwan, buys up American farmland next to military bases, and floods our streets with fentanyl, while its partners in Mexico continue to butcher Americans at the border. Yet these senators continue to allow millions of unknown, undocumented people to flood into our country.

The Senate lost all credibility under the Biden administration

So let me ask you, Senators: Who is the traitor here? Is it the president? Is it his family? Is it the people under your oversight who knowingly spread false information to protect him? Or is it you? Are you complicit? Are you corrupt? Or are you simply incompetent? It’s one of the three: incompetence, corruption, or outright treason. Pick one. Because this country is waking up, and the American people deserve an answer.

We are looking for a lot of answers.

  • Who was actually executing the duties of the president of the United States?
  • Who was responsible for the coup ousting a sitting president?
  • Who ultimately selected Harris as the Democrats' candidate?
  • Why did the list of names for presidential pardons include so many of you and your colleagues? Did you have a hand in composing the list? We know that Joe Biden wasn’t competent enough to write it. Is this why you are so terrified of people simply seeking the truth?

Let’s be crystal clear about what this is: This is the deep state fighting for its survival — desperate people doing everything they can to stay out of jail. This is the ruling class — Democrats and Republicans alike — panicking because, for the first time in decades, their grip on power is slipping. At best, it's those who’ve been in bed with the intelligence and military-industrial complex, convinced that war and American intervention are the answers, doing everything they can to protect their secrets and sustain their policies.

But the old tricks don’t work any more. The smears, the leaks, the media hit jobs, the fake outrage — they’ve played that hand too many times. We now know the system is corrupt. We know the game is rigged. And we know there is no moral high ground left to stand on — not for these senators, these bureaucrats, or the intelligence agencies that lie to the American people with impunity. Not for the politicians who have lined their pockets while Americans suffer. They are all mired in the same swamp, desperately trying to keep the floodgates from bursting wide open.

What we’re witnessing right now isn’t strength or power. This is desperation. These are the death throes of a system that has been corrupt for decades — a system that has finally met an opponent it cannot buy, intimidate, or control.

We need to be rooting for Trump’s ‘disruptors’

That’s why every American should be rooting for these disruptors. They aren’t just trying to fix a few broken policies or reform a couple of agencies at the margins. They are going after the entire system. They see what we see: You don’t clean up a house by dusting the furniture; you tear out the rot from the foundation. Make no mistake, that’s exactly what it will take. This country doesn’t need another political band-aid, another round of empty hearings, or another worthless promise from the same people who have failed us for generations. It needs a shock to the system — a defibrillator to the chest of a dying republic. And these appointees, Trump’s team, are the only ones with the courage to deliver it.

Can you name a more dangerous job than going against 18 intelligence agencies, with all their tools, tricks, and decades of lying, setups, and even killings? Tulsi Gabbard isn’t a fool, and she’s not unafraid. She knows the stakes — this is bigger than her life. This is work that could get her killed or “suicided.” Imagine what they can make people believe with the tech we already have. Would you take that job? The least we can do is make our voices of support heard. These people are modern-day heroes of the republic.

Kash Patel is in the same boat. Yesterday, he spoke of releasing all the names in Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book. If anyone believes Epstein hung himself with paper sheets, they are delusional. What kind of danger is Patel in now?

Let’s not forget the dangers of challenging the most powerful industries — government contracts, graft, and a crime sheet from COVID that stretches ad infinitum. What could possibly happen to RFK Jr. in his quest for the truth about our pharmaceutical industry?

Now, it’s in our hands. It’s up to us to let these senators know that we are watching, that we are serious, and that we will no longer tolerate their cowardice and complicity. This is not a riot. This is not chaos. This is not insurrection. This is a lawful revolution at the ballot box, in our communities, and in our voices demanding real accountability.

We actually have to act, not just grumble

For my entire life, I’ve heard the American people say, “Throw the bums out.” But we never have. We’ve grumbled, we’ve complained, and we’ve shaken our fists at the TV, but we never followed through. For those who were part of the Tea Party and have never given up, this is the outcome we were all hoping for 20 years ago.

When Obama voters voted for hope and change, I believe this was the change they were hoping for — transparency, accountability, and an end to a ruling class that never had to pay a price — the end of special-interest rule, the end of endless wars, the end of corruption and cover-ups. Americans, left, right, and center, are waking up. We are tired of the hatred, name-calling, and corruption.

We are tired of being pawns on a chessboard. We are tired of politicians and the state-run media whipping us into a frenzy to distract us from the real issues and villains. The most dangerous villains to our republic don’t live on Main Street — they live on K Street, outside the Beltway, and in the District of Columbia. Time and time again, we speak out and then fail to hold those people responsible. This time, we will remember and act. This time, we must. Because the alternative is unthinkable.

So spare us the theatrics. Stop the kabuki theater of these hearings. Enough with the show trials, the false outrage, and the ridiculous accusations. Let Trump and his team go to work. Let them do exactly what the American people sent them to do: clean house.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on TheBlaze.com.

URGENT: FIVE steps to CONTROL AI before it's too late!

MANAURE QUINTERO / Contributor | Getty Images

By now, many of us are familiar with AI and its potential benefits and threats. However, unless you're a tech tycoon, it can feel like you have little influence over the future of artificial intelligence.

For years, Glenn has warned about the dangers of rapidly developing AI technologies that have taken the world by storm.

He acknowledges their significant benefits but emphasizes the need to establish proper boundaries and ethics now, while we still have control. But since most people aren’t Silicon Valley tech leaders making the decisions, how can they help keep AI in check?

Recently, Glenn interviewed Tristan Harris, a tech ethicist deeply concerned about the potential harm of unchecked AI, to discuss its societal implications. Harris highlighted a concerning new piece of legislation proposed by Texas Senator Ted Cruz. This legislation proposes a state-level moratorium on AI regulation, meaning only the federal government could regulate AI. Harris noted that there’s currently no Federal plan for regulating AI. Until the federal government establishes a plan, tech companies would have nearly free rein with their AI. And we all know how slowly the federal government moves.

This is where you come in. Tristan Harris shared with Glenn the top five actions you should urge your representatives to take regarding AI, including opposing the moratorium until a concrete plan is in place. Now is your chance to influence the future of AI. Contact your senator and congressman today and share these five crucial steps they must take to keep AI in check:

Ban engagement-optimized AI companions for kids

Create legislation that will prevent AI from being designed to maximize addiction, sexualization, flattery, and attachment disorders, and to protect young people’s mental health and ability to form real-life friendships.

Establish basic liability laws

Companies need to be held accountable when their products cause real-world harm.

Pass increased whistleblower protections

Protect concerned technologists working inside the AI labs from facing untenable pressures and threats that prevent them from warning the public when the AI rollout is unsafe or crosses dangerous red lines.

Prevent AI from having legal rights

Enact laws so AIs don’t have protected speech or have their own bank accounts, making sure our legal system works for human interests over AI interests.

Oppose the state moratorium on AI 

Call your congressman or Senator Cruz’s office, and demand they oppose the state moratorium on AI without a plan for how we will set guardrails for this technology.

Glenn: Only Trump dared to deliver on decades of empty promises

Tasos Katopodis / Stringer | Getty Images

The Islamic regime has been killing Americans since 1979. Now Trump’s response proves we’re no longer playing defense — we’re finally hitting back.

The United States has taken direct military action against Iran’s nuclear program. Whatever you think of the strike, it’s over. It’s happened. And now, we have to predict what happens next. I want to help you understand the gravity of this situation: what happened, what it means, and what might come next. To that end, we need to begin with a little history.

Since 1979, Iran has been at war with us — even if we refused to call it that.

We are either on the verge of a remarkable strategic victory or a devastating global escalation. Time will tell.

It began with the hostage crisis, when 66 Americans were seized and 52 were held for over a year by the radical Islamic regime. Four years later, 17 more Americans were murdered in the U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut, followed by 241 Marines in the Beirut barracks bombing.

Then came the Khobar Towers bombing in 1996, which killed 19 more U.S. airmen. Iran had its fingerprints all over it.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, Iranian-backed proxies killed hundreds of American soldiers. From 2001 to 2020 in Afghanistan and 2003 to 2011 in Iraq, Iran supplied IEDs and tactical support.

The Iranians have plotted assassinations and kidnappings on U.S. soil — in 2011, 2021, and again in 2024 — and yet we’ve never really responded.

The precedent for U.S. retaliation has always been present, but no president has chosen to pull the trigger until this past weekend. President Donald Trump struck decisively. And what our military pulled off this weekend was nothing short of extraordinary.

Operation Midnight Hammer

The strike was reportedly called Operation Midnight Hammer. It involved as many as 175 U.S. aircraft, including 12 B-2 stealth bombers — out of just 19 in our entire arsenal. Those bombers are among the most complex machines in the world, and they were kept mission-ready by some of the finest mechanics on the planet.

USAF / Handout | Getty Images

To throw off Iranian radar and intelligence, some bombers flew west toward Guam — classic misdirection. The rest flew east, toward the real targets.

As the B-2s approached Iranian airspace, U.S. submarines launched dozens of Tomahawk missiles at Iran’s fortified nuclear facilities. Minutes later, the bombers dropped 14 MOPs — massive ordnance penetrators — each designed to drill deep into the earth and destroy underground bunkers. These bombs are the size of an F-16 and cost millions of dollars apiece. They are so accurate, I’ve been told they can hit the top of a soda can from 15,000 feet.

They were built for this mission — and we’ve been rehearsing this run for 15 years.

If the satellite imagery is accurate — and if what my sources tell me is true — the targeted nuclear sites were utterly destroyed. We’ll likely rely on the Israelis to confirm that on the ground.

This was a master class in strategy, execution, and deterrence. And it proved that only the United States could carry out a strike like this. I am very proud of our military, what we are capable of doing, and what we can accomplish.

What comes next

We don’t yet know how Iran will respond, but many of the possibilities are troubling. The Iranians could target U.S. forces across the Middle East. On Monday, Tehran launched 20 missiles at U.S. bases in Qatar, Syria, and Kuwait, to no effect. God forbid, they could also unleash Hezbollah or other terrorist proxies to strike here at home — and they just might.

Iran has also threatened to shut down the Strait of Hormuz — the artery through which nearly a fifth of the world’s oil flows. On Sunday, Iran’s parliament voted to begin the process. If the Supreme Council and the ayatollah give the go-ahead, we could see oil prices spike to $150 or even $200 a barrel.

That would be catastrophic.

The 2008 financial collapse was pushed over the edge when oil hit $130. Western economies — including ours — simply cannot sustain oil above $120 for long. If this conflict escalates and the Strait is closed, the global economy could unravel.

The strike also raises questions about regime stability. Will it spark an uprising, or will the Islamic regime respond with a brutal crackdown on dissidents?

Early signs aren’t hopeful. Reports suggest hundreds of arrests over the weekend and at least one dissident executed on charges of spying for Israel. The regime’s infamous morality police, the Gasht-e Ershad, are back on the streets. Every phone, every vehicle — monitored. The U.S. embassy in Qatar issued a shelter-in-place warning for Americans.

Russia and China both condemned the strike. On Monday, a senior Iranian official flew to Moscow to meet with Vladimir Putin. That meeting should alarm anyone paying attention. Their alliance continues to deepen — and that’s a serious concern.

Now we pray

We are either on the verge of a remarkable strategic victory or a devastating global escalation. Time will tell. But either way, President Trump didn’t start this. He inherited it — and he took decisive action.

The difference is, he did what they all said they would do. He didn’t send pallets of cash in the dead of night. He didn’t sign another failed treaty.

He acted. Now, we pray. For peace, for wisdom, and for the strength to meet whatever comes next.


This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Globalize the Intifada? Why Mamdani’s plan spells DOOM for America

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

If New Yorkers hand City Hall to Zohran Mamdani, they’re not voting for change. They’re opening the door to an alliance of socialism, Islamism, and chaos.

It only took 25 years for New York City to go from the resilient, flag-waving pride following the 9/11 attacks to a political fever dream. To quote Michael Malice, “I'm old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it.”

Malice is talking about Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist assemblyman from Queens now eyeing the mayor’s office. Mamdani, a 33-year-old state representative emerging from relative political obscurity, is now receiving substantial funding for his mayoral campaign from the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

CAIR has a long and concerning history, including being born out of the Muslim Brotherhood and named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding case. Why would the group have dropped $100,000 into a PAC backing Mamdani’s campaign?

Mamdani blends political Islam with Marxist economics — two ideologies that have left tens of millions dead in the 20th century alone.

Perhaps CAIR has a vested interest in Mamdani’s call to “globalize the intifada.” That’s not a call for peaceful protest. Intifada refers to historic uprisings of Muslims against what they call the “Israeli occupation of Palestine.” Suicide bombings and street violence are part of the playbook. So when Mamdani says he wants to “globalize” that, who exactly is the enemy in this global scenario? Because it sure sounds like he's saying America is the new Israel, and anyone who supports Western democracy is the new Zionist.

Mamdani tried to clean up his language by citing the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, which once used “intifada” in an Arabic-language article to describe the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. So now he’s comparing Palestinians to Jewish victims of the Nazis? If that doesn’t twist your stomach into knots, you’re not paying attention.

If you’re “globalizing” an intifada, and positioning Israel — and now America — as the Nazis, that’s not a cry for human rights. That’s a call for chaos and violence.

Rising Islamism

But hey, this is New York. Faculty members at Columbia University — where Mamdani’s own father once worked — signed a letter defending students who supported Hamas after October 7. They also contributed to Mamdani’s mayoral campaign. And his father? He blamed Ronald Reagan and the religious right for inspiring Islamic terrorism, as if the roots of 9/11 grew in Washington, not the caves of Tora Bora.

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

This isn’t about Islam as a faith. We should distinguish between Islam and Islamism. Islam is a religion followed peacefully by millions. Islamism is something entirely different — an ideology that seeks to merge mosque and state, impose Sharia law, and destroy secular liberal democracies from within. Islamism isn’t about prayer and fasting. It’s about power.

Criticizing Islamism is not Islamophobia. It is not an attack on peaceful Muslims. In fact, Muslims are often its first victims.

Islamism is misogynistic, theocratic, violent, and supremacist. It’s hostile to free speech, religious pluralism, gay rights, secularism — even to moderate Muslims. Yet somehow, the progressive left — the same left that claims to fight for feminism, LGBTQ rights, and free expression — finds itself defending candidates like Mamdani. You can’t make this stuff up.

Blending the worst ideologies

And if that weren’t enough, Mamdani also identifies as a Democratic Socialist. He blends political Islam with Marxist economics — two ideologies that have left tens of millions dead in the 20th century alone. But don’t worry, New York. I’m sure this time socialism will totally work. Just like it always didn’t.

If you’re a business owner, a parent, a person who’s saved anything, or just someone who values sanity: Get out. I’m serious. If Mamdani becomes mayor, as seems likely, then New York City will become a case study in what happens when you marry ideological extremism with political power. And it won’t be pretty.

This is about more than one mayoral race. It’s about the future of Western liberalism. It’s about drawing a bright line between faith and fanaticism, between healthy pluralism and authoritarian dogma.

Call out radicalism

We must call out political Islam the same way we call out white nationalism or any other supremacist ideology. When someone chants “globalize the intifada,” that should send a chill down your spine — whether you’re Jewish, Christian, Muslim, atheist, or anything in between.

The left may try to shame you into silence with words like “Islamophobia,” but the record is worn out. The grooves are shallow. The American people see what’s happening. And we’re not buying it.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Could China OWN our National Parks?

Jonathan Newton / Contributor | Getty Images

The left’s idea of stewardship involves bulldozing bison and barring access. Lee’s vision puts conservation back in the hands of the people.

The media wants you to believe that Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is trying to bulldoze Yellowstone and turn national parks into strip malls — that he’s calling for a reckless fire sale of America’s natural beauty to line developers’ pockets. That narrative is dishonest. It’s fearmongering, and, by the way, it’s wrong.

Here’s what’s really happening.

Private stewardship works. It’s local. It’s accountable. It’s incentivized.

The federal government currently owns 640 million acres of land — nearly 28% of all land in the United States. To put that into perspective, that’s more territory than France, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom combined.

Most of this land is west of the Mississippi River. That’s not a coincidence. In the American West, federal ownership isn’t just a bureaucratic technicality — it’s a stranglehold. States are suffocated. Locals are treated as tenants. Opportunities are choked off.

Meanwhile, people living east of the Mississippi — in places like Kentucky, Georgia, or Pennsylvania — might not even realize how little land their own states truly control. But the same policies that are plaguing the West could come for them next.

Lee isn’t proposing to auction off Yellowstone or pave over Yosemite. He’s talking about 3 million acres — that’s less than half of 1% of the federal estate. And this land isn’t your family’s favorite hiking trail. It’s remote, hard to access, and often mismanaged.

Failed management

Why was it mismanaged in the first place? Because the federal government is a terrible landlord.

Consider Yellowstone again. It’s home to the last remaining herd of genetically pure American bison — animals that haven’t been crossbred with cattle. Ranchers, myself included, would love the chance to help restore these majestic creatures on private land. But the federal government won’t allow it.

So what do they do when the herd gets too big?

They kill them. Bulldoze them into mass graves. That’s not conservation. That’s bureaucratic malpractice.

And don’t even get me started on bald eagles — majestic symbols of American freedom and a federally protected endangered species, now regularly slaughtered by wind turbines. I have pictures of piles of dead bald eagles. Where’s the outrage?

Biden’s federal land-grab

Some argue that states can’t afford to manage this land themselves. But if the states can’t afford it, how can Washington? We’re $35 trillion in debt. Entitlements are strained, infrastructure is crumbling, and the Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, and National Park Service are billions of dollars behind in basic maintenance. Roads, firebreaks, and trails are falling apart.

The Biden administration quietly embraced something called the “30 by 30” initiative, a plan to lock up 30% of all U.S. land and water under federal “conservation” by 2030. The real goal is 50% by 2050.

That entails half of the country being taken away from you, controlled not by the people who live there but by technocrats in D.C.

You think that won’t affect your ability to hunt, fish, graze cattle, or cut timber? Think again. It won’t be conservatives who stop you from building a cabin, raising cattle, or teaching your grandkids how to shoot a rifle. It’ll be the same radical environmentalists who treat land as sacred — unless it’s your truck, your deer stand, or your back yard.

Land as collateral

Moreover, the U.S. Treasury is considering putting federally owned land on the national balance sheet, listing your parks, forests, and hunting grounds as collateral.

What happens if America defaults on its debt?

David McNew / Stringer | Getty Images

Do you think our creditors won’t come calling? Imagine explaining to your kids that the lake you used to fish in is now under foreign ownership, that the forest you hunted in belongs to China.

This is not hypothetical. This is the logical conclusion of treating land like a piggy bank.

The American way

There’s a better way — and it’s the American way.

Let the people who live near the land steward it. Let ranchers, farmers, sportsmen, and local conservationists do what they’ve done for generations.

Did you know that 75% of America’s wetlands are on private land? Or that the most successful wildlife recoveries — whitetail deer, ducks, wild turkeys — didn’t come from Washington but from partnerships between private landowners and groups like Ducks Unlimited?

Private stewardship works. It’s local. It’s accountable. It’s incentivized. When you break it, you fix it. When you profit from the land, you protect it.

This is not about selling out. It’s about buying in — to freedom, to responsibility, to the principle of constitutional self-governance.

So when you hear the pundits cry foul over 3 million acres of federal land, remember: We don’t need Washington to protect our land. We need Washington to get out of the way.

Because this isn’t just about land. It’s about liberty. And once liberty is lost, it doesn’t come back easily.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.