Glenn: The senate confirmation hearings reek of hypocrisy and corruption

Kevin Dietsch / Staff | Getty Images

These old tricks don't work any more.

During the 2024 campaign, the left tirelessly decried Donald Trump as a “threat to democracy” and a danger to the “rule of law.” But as we watch the spectacle unfolding in these so-called confirmation hearings, it becomes increasingly difficult to ignore the glaring hypocrisy of those same voices. Where is the outrage now? Where are the cries about the erosion of democracy, the disregard for the rule of law, or the misuse of government institutions for political gain? The disgraceful behavior we've witnessed in these hearings is a betrayal of the very principles these lawmakers claim to champion.

The smears, the leaks, the media hit jobs, the fake outrage — they’ve played that hand too many times.

Bernie Sanders railed against … baby onesies

America is teetering on the edge of war, facing an economic free fall, and witnessing the weaponization of the very institutions politicians like Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — America’s favorite millionaire socialist — claim to protect. Yet in this critical moment in our country, Sanders railed against baby onesies.

Antivaxx. Baby. Onesies.

Do you take your job seriously if that’s how you conduct yourself when questioning the nominee to head the Department of Health and Human Services? As a so-called champion of lowering health care costs and issues actually plaguing the American people?

However, when RFK Jr. had the unmitigated gall to point out that Sanders is the single largest recipient of pharmaceutical money in the Senate, Sanders didn’t deny it. Instead, he did what they all do:

  • He tried to silence him.
  • He attempted to dismiss him.
  • He worked to discredit him.

This is the same Bernie Sanders who has spent decades railing against corporate greed, but when the money flows his way, he suddenly has nothing to say.

The hypocrisy during Kash Patel’s hearing was nauseating

Then there's Kash Patel. He's been accused — without a shred of evidence — of planning to weaponize the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. But by whom? By the very same senators who’ve spent the last 26 years doing exactly that. These are the same people who oversaw raids on journalists, spied on sitting presidents, suppressed political opponents, and imprisoned pro-life activists while violent rioters roamed free.

And yet these people have the audacity to act outraged about the politicization of law enforcement? The hypocrisy is so thick that it’s nearly suffocating.

Tulsi Gabbard was smeared as a ‘Russian asset’

When Tulsi Gabbard finally had the chance to speak, she laid it out plainly: Corruption within our intelligence community is not a theory — it's a fact. Yet instead of responding to her legitimate accusations, they smeared her as a Russian asset, a traitor, a spy for Syria. These people are so desperate to maintain their grip on power that they will destroy anyone who dares to expose them.

They asked her whether Edward Snowden was a traitor, but they weren’t interested in the answer. The truth is too dangerous for them: that Snowden should never have had to blow the whistle, because this very committee — these very senators — should have done their jobs and stopped unconstitutional surveillance programs before they even began.

These are the same people who oversaw the FBI’s lies to the American people about the Hunter Biden laptop — proof that the sitting president and his family took tens of millions of dollars from foreign adversaries, including China, the same government that now threatens Taiwan, buys up American farmland next to military bases, and floods our streets with fentanyl, while its partners in Mexico continue to butcher Americans at the border. Yet these senators continue to allow millions of unknown, undocumented people to flood into our country.

The Senate lost all credibility under the Biden administration

So let me ask you, Senators: Who is the traitor here? Is it the president? Is it his family? Is it the people under your oversight who knowingly spread false information to protect him? Or is it you? Are you complicit? Are you corrupt? Or are you simply incompetent? It’s one of the three: incompetence, corruption, or outright treason. Pick one. Because this country is waking up, and the American people deserve an answer.

We are looking for a lot of answers.

  • Who was actually executing the duties of the president of the United States?
  • Who was responsible for the coup ousting a sitting president?
  • Who ultimately selected Harris as the Democrats' candidate?
  • Why did the list of names for presidential pardons include so many of you and your colleagues? Did you have a hand in composing the list? We know that Joe Biden wasn’t competent enough to write it. Is this why you are so terrified of people simply seeking the truth?

Let’s be crystal clear about what this is: This is the deep state fighting for its survival — desperate people doing everything they can to stay out of jail. This is the ruling class — Democrats and Republicans alike — panicking because, for the first time in decades, their grip on power is slipping. At best, it's those who’ve been in bed with the intelligence and military-industrial complex, convinced that war and American intervention are the answers, doing everything they can to protect their secrets and sustain their policies.

But the old tricks don’t work any more. The smears, the leaks, the media hit jobs, the fake outrage — they’ve played that hand too many times. We now know the system is corrupt. We know the game is rigged. And we know there is no moral high ground left to stand on — not for these senators, these bureaucrats, or the intelligence agencies that lie to the American people with impunity. Not for the politicians who have lined their pockets while Americans suffer. They are all mired in the same swamp, desperately trying to keep the floodgates from bursting wide open.

What we’re witnessing right now isn’t strength or power. This is desperation. These are the death throes of a system that has been corrupt for decades — a system that has finally met an opponent it cannot buy, intimidate, or control.

We need to be rooting for Trump’s ‘disruptors’

That’s why every American should be rooting for these disruptors. They aren’t just trying to fix a few broken policies or reform a couple of agencies at the margins. They are going after the entire system. They see what we see: You don’t clean up a house by dusting the furniture; you tear out the rot from the foundation. Make no mistake, that’s exactly what it will take. This country doesn’t need another political band-aid, another round of empty hearings, or another worthless promise from the same people who have failed us for generations. It needs a shock to the system — a defibrillator to the chest of a dying republic. And these appointees, Trump’s team, are the only ones with the courage to deliver it.

Can you name a more dangerous job than going against 18 intelligence agencies, with all their tools, tricks, and decades of lying, setups, and even killings? Tulsi Gabbard isn’t a fool, and she’s not unafraid. She knows the stakes — this is bigger than her life. This is work that could get her killed or “suicided.” Imagine what they can make people believe with the tech we already have. Would you take that job? The least we can do is make our voices of support heard. These people are modern-day heroes of the republic.

Kash Patel is in the same boat. Yesterday, he spoke of releasing all the names in Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book. If anyone believes Epstein hung himself with paper sheets, they are delusional. What kind of danger is Patel in now?

Let’s not forget the dangers of challenging the most powerful industries — government contracts, graft, and a crime sheet from COVID that stretches ad infinitum. What could possibly happen to RFK Jr. in his quest for the truth about our pharmaceutical industry?

Now, it’s in our hands. It’s up to us to let these senators know that we are watching, that we are serious, and that we will no longer tolerate their cowardice and complicity. This is not a riot. This is not chaos. This is not insurrection. This is a lawful revolution at the ballot box, in our communities, and in our voices demanding real accountability.

We actually have to act, not just grumble

For my entire life, I’ve heard the American people say, “Throw the bums out.” But we never have. We’ve grumbled, we’ve complained, and we’ve shaken our fists at the TV, but we never followed through. For those who were part of the Tea Party and have never given up, this is the outcome we were all hoping for 20 years ago.

When Obama voters voted for hope and change, I believe this was the change they were hoping for — transparency, accountability, and an end to a ruling class that never had to pay a price — the end of special-interest rule, the end of endless wars, the end of corruption and cover-ups. Americans, left, right, and center, are waking up. We are tired of the hatred, name-calling, and corruption.

We are tired of being pawns on a chessboard. We are tired of politicians and the state-run media whipping us into a frenzy to distract us from the real issues and villains. The most dangerous villains to our republic don’t live on Main Street — they live on K Street, outside the Beltway, and in the District of Columbia. Time and time again, we speak out and then fail to hold those people responsible. This time, we will remember and act. This time, we must. Because the alternative is unthinkable.

So spare us the theatrics. Stop the kabuki theater of these hearings. Enough with the show trials, the false outrage, and the ridiculous accusations. Let Trump and his team go to work. Let them do exactly what the American people sent them to do: clean house.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on TheBlaze.com.

'Rage against the dying of the light': Charlie Kirk lived that mandate

PHILL MAGAKOE / Contributor | Getty Images

Kirk’s tragic death challenges us to rise above fear and anger, to rebuild bridges where others build walls, and to fight for the America he believed in.

I’ve only felt this weight once before. It was 2001, just as my radio show was about to begin. The World Trade Center fell, and I was called to speak immediately. I spent the day and night by my bedside, praying for words that could meet the moment.

Yesterday, I found myself in the same position. September 11, 2025. The assassination of Charlie Kirk. A friend. A warrior for truth.

Out of this tragedy, the tyrant dies, but the martyr’s influence begins.

Moments like this make words feel inadequate. Yet sometimes, words from another time speak directly to our own. In 1947, Dylan Thomas, watching his father slip toward death, penned lines that now resonate far beyond his own grief:

Do not go gentle into that good night. / Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Thomas was pleading for his father to resist the impending darkness of death. But those words have become a mandate for all of us: Do not surrender. Do not bow to shadows. Even when the battle feels unwinnable.

Charlie Kirk lived that mandate. He knew the cost of speaking unpopular truths. He knew the fury of those who sought to silence him. And yet he pressed on. In his life, he embodied a defiance rooted not in anger, but in principle.

Picking up his torch

Washington, Jefferson, Adams — our history was started by men who raged against an empire, knowing the gallows might await. Lincoln raged against slavery. Martin Luther King Jr. raged against segregation. Every generation faces a call to resist surrender.

It is our turn. Charlie’s violent death feels like a knockout punch. Yet if his life meant anything, it means this: Silence in the face of darkness is not an option.

He did not go gently. He spoke. He challenged. He stood. And now, the mantle falls to us. To me. To you. To every American.

We cannot drift into the shadows. We cannot sit quietly while freedom fades. This is our moment to rage — not with hatred, not with vengeance, but with courage. Rage against lies, against apathy, against the despair that tells us to do nothing. Because there is always something you can do.

Even small acts — defiance, faith, kindness — are light in the darkness. Reaching out to those who mourn. Speaking truth in a world drowning in deceit. These are the flames that hold back the night. Charlie carried that torch. He laid it down yesterday. It is ours to pick up.

The light may dim, but it always does before dawn. Commit today: I will not sleep as freedom fades. I will not retreat as darkness encroaches. I will not be silent as evil forces claim dominion. I have no king but Christ. And I know whom I serve, as did Charlie.

Two turning points, decades apart

On Wednesday, the world changed again. Two tragedies, separated by decades, bound by the same question: Who are we? Is this worth saving? What kind of people will we choose to be?

Imagine a world where more of us choose to be peacemakers. Not passive, not silent, but builders of bridges where others erect walls. Respect and listening transform even the bitterest of foes. Charlie Kirk embodied this principle.

He did not strike the weak; he challenged the powerful. He reached across divides of politics, culture, and faith. He changed hearts. He sparked healing. And healing is what our nation needs.

At the center of all this is one truth: Every person is a child of God, deserving of dignity. Change will not happen in Washington or on social media. It begins at home, where loneliness and isolation threaten our souls. Family is the antidote. Imperfect, yes — but still the strongest source of stability and meaning.

Mark Wilson / Staff | Getty Images

Forgiveness, fidelity, faithfulness, and honor are not dusty words. They are the foundation of civilization. Strong families produce strong citizens. And today, Charlie’s family mourns. They must become our family too. We must stand as guardians of his legacy, shining examples of the courage he lived by.

A time for courage

I knew Charlie. I know how he would want us to respond: Multiply his courage. Out of this tragedy, the tyrant dies, but the martyr’s influence begins. Out of darkness, great and glorious things will sprout — but we must be worthy of them.

Charlie Kirk lived defiantly. He stood in truth. He changed the world. And now, his torch is in our hands. Rage, not in violence, but in unwavering pursuit of truth and goodness. Rage against the dying of the light.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Glenn Beck is once again calling on his loyal listeners and viewers to come together and channel the same unity and purpose that defined the historic 9-12 Project. That movement, born in the wake of national challenges, brought millions together to revive core values of faith, hope, and charity.

Glenn created the original 9-12 Project in early 2009 to bring Americans back to where they were in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. In those moments, we weren't Democrats and Republicans, conservative or liberal, Red States or Blue States, we were united as one, as America. The original 9-12 Project aimed to root America back in the founding principles of this country that united us during those darkest of days.

This new initiative draws directly from that legacy, focusing on supporting the family of Charlie Kirk in these dark days following his tragic murder.

The revival of the 9-12 Project aims to secure the long-term well-being of Charlie Kirk's wife and children. All donations will go straight to meeting their immediate and future needs. If the family deems the funds surplus to their requirements, Charlie's wife has the option to redirect them toward the vital work of Turning Point USA.

This campaign is more than just financial support—it's a profound gesture of appreciation for Kirk's tireless dedication to the cause of liberty. It embodies the unbreakable bond of our community, proving that when we stand united, we can make a real difference.
Glenn Beck invites you to join this effort. Show your solidarity by donating today and honoring Charlie Kirk and his family in this meaningful way.

You can learn more about the 9-12 Project and donate HERE

The critical difference: Rights from the Creator, not the state

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

When politicians claim that rights flow from the state, they pave the way for tyranny.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) recently delivered a lecture that should alarm every American. During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, he argued that believing rights come from a Creator rather than government is the same belief held by Iran’s theocratic regime.

Kaine claimed that the principles underpinning Iran’s dictatorship — the same regime that persecutes Sunnis, Jews, Christians, and other minorities — are also the principles enshrined in our Declaration of Independence.

In America, rights belong to the individual. In Iran, rights serve the state.

That claim exposes either a profound misunderstanding or a reckless indifference to America’s founding. Rights do not come from government. They never did. They come from the Creator, as the Declaration of Independence proclaims without qualification. Jefferson didn’t hedge. Rights are unalienable — built into every human being.

This foundation stands worlds apart from Iran. Its leaders invoke God but grant rights only through clerical interpretation. Freedom of speech, property, religion, and even life itself depend on obedience to the ruling clerics. Step outside their dictates, and those so-called rights vanish.

This is not a trivial difference. It is the essence of liberty versus tyranny. In America, rights belong to the individual. The government’s role is to secure them, not define them. In Iran, rights serve the state. They empower rulers, not the people.

From Muhammad to Marx

The same confusion applies to Marxist regimes. The Soviet Union’s constitutions promised citizens rights — work, health care, education, freedom of speech — but always with fine print. If you spoke out against the party, those rights evaporated. If you practiced religion openly, you were charged with treason. Property and voting were allowed as long as they were filtered and controlled by the state — and could be revoked at any moment. Rights were conditional, granted through obedience.

Kaine seems to be advocating a similar approach — whether consciously or not. By claiming that natural rights are somehow comparable to sharia law, he ignores the critical distinction between inherent rights and conditional privileges. He dismisses the very principle that made America a beacon of freedom.

Jefferson and the founders understood this clearly. “We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights,” they wrote. No government, no cleric, no king can revoke them. They exist by virtue of humanity itself. The government exists to protect them, not ration them.

This is not a theological quibble. It is the entire basis of our government. Confuse the source of rights, and tyranny hides behind piety or ideology. The people are disempowered. Clerics, bureaucrats, or politicians become arbiters of what rights citizens may enjoy.

John Greim / Contributor | Getty Images

Gifts from God, not the state

Kaine’s statement reflects either a profound ignorance of this principle or an ideological bias that favors state power over individual liberty. Either way, Americans must recognize the danger. Understanding the origin of rights is not academic — it is the difference between freedom and submission, between the American experiment and theocratic or totalitarian rule.

Rights are not gifts from the state. They are gifts from God, secured by reason, protected by law, and defended by the people. Every American must understand this. Because when rights come from government instead of the Creator, freedom disappears.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

POLL: Is America’s next generation trading freedom for equity?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

A recent poll conducted by Justin Haskins, a long-time friend of the show, has uncovered alarming trends among young Americans aged 18-39, revealing a generation grappling with deep frustrations over economic hardships, housing affordability, and a perceived rigged system that favors the wealthy, corporations, and older generations. While nearly half of these likely voters approve of President Trump, seeing him as an anti-establishment figure, over 70% support nationalizing major industries, such as healthcare, energy, and big tech, to promote "equity." Shockingly, 53% want a democratic socialist to win the 2028 presidential election, including a third of Trump voters and conservatives in this age group. Many cite skyrocketing housing costs, unfair taxation on the middle class, and a sense of being "stuck" or in crisis as driving forces, with 62% believing the economy is tilted against them and 55% backing laws to confiscate "excess wealth" like second homes or luxury items to help first-time buyers.

This blend of Trump support and socialist leanings suggests a volatile mix: admiration for disruptors who challenge the status quo, coupled with a desire for radical redistribution to address personal struggles. Yet, it raises profound questions about the roots of this discontent—Is it a failure of education on history's lessons about socialism's failures? Media indoctrination? Or genuine systemic barriers? And what does it portend for the nation’s trajectory—greater division, a shift toward authoritarian policies, or an opportunity for renewal through timeless values like hard work and individual responsibility?

Glenn wants to know what YOU think: Where do Gen Z's socialist sympathies come from? What does it mean for the future of America? Make your voice heard in the poll below:

Do you believe the Gen Z support for socialism comes from perceived economic frustrations like unaffordable housing and a rigged system favoring the wealthy and corporations?

Do you believe the Gen Z support for socialism, including many Trump supporters, is due to a lack of education about the historical failures of socialist systems?

Do you think that these poll results indicate a growing generational divide that could lead to more political instability and authoritarian tendencies in America's future?

Do you think that this poll implies that America's long-term stability relies on older generations teaching Gen Z and younger to prioritize self-reliance, free-market ideals, and personal accountability?

Do you think the Gen Z support for Trump is an opportunity for conservatives to win them over with anti-establishment reforms that preserve liberty?