Kavanaugh might be the force to turn back the blue wave

Michael Reaves/Getty Images

Regardless what the absolute truth is about Brett Kavanaugh during his high school and college days – and we'll likely never know with certainty – the fact is, Senate Democrats stooped to lowly political warfare to try to derail his confirmation. And while it looked like the dirty tricks might work in their favor early on, it now seems the strategy may be backfiring. Polling indicates that the Kavanaugh circus is energizing Republican voters.

RELATED: THE VOTE: Finally the end is in sight — or is it?

An NPR-PBS-Marist poll this week found there is now a negligible difference between the percentage of Democrats and Republicans who consider the upcoming mid-term elections to be "very important." That change is significant because when the same poll was taken in July – well before the Kavanaugh hearings began – the percentage of Democrats who consider the mid-terms very important was significantly higher than Republicans. In the new poll, the "very important" response from Republicans is up twelve percent. Pollsters are convinced this is the Kavanaugh effect.

That trend is also reflected in polling from six states with competitive Senate races: Arizona, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, and Texas where Republicans have either narrowed the gap or pulled ahead, largely thanks to the Kavanaugh battle. Nationally, Republican donations are up 175% in the last week.

Until yesterday, only two Senate Democrats up for reelection – Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Heidi Heitkamp from North Dakota – had not publicly opposed Kavanaugh. Heitkamp is considered more likely than Manchin to lose in November, yet she announced yesterday that she will vote "no" on Kavanaugh. Manchin is apparently still reading the latest FBI report, or more likely, testing which way the political wind is currently blowing in West Virginia.

Democrats had Republicans right where they wanted them – divided over President Trump. They were ripe for the taking.

Democrats had Republicans right where they wanted them – divided over President Trump. They were ripe for the taking. The last thing you would want to do strategically is anything to make the different Republican camps come together on an issue. Democrats had one job, but they wasted their anti-Trump political capital on trying to take down a Supreme Court nominee who wasn't even the most conservative pick on Trump's shortlist. Imagine what this process would have been like if Trump had picked Amy Coney Barrett.

That's not to say Kavanaugh's confirmation is a done deal of course. It will be shocking if there's not some late-breaking, last-ditch, new accusation or line of attack on Kavanaugh today ahead of the full Senate vote tomorrow.

Whether it's a 'War on Christmas' or just progressivism run amok, the song 'Baby It's Cold Outside' has been firmly in the crosshairs this holiday season. Here are just a few of the headlines making the rounds:

Should radio stations stop playing 'Baby, It's Cold Outside'?

They range from the previous as questioning and then roll right into the following and assume facts not in evidence.

'Baby, It's Cold Outside,' Seen As Sexist, Frozen Out by Radio Stations

It may be seen as sexist but according to one radio stations polling, only about 5% do. Then they go from saying it's sexist to straight up claiming it as a rape song.

Radio Bans 'Baby It's Cold Outside' Over Claims It's A Rape Song, English Teacher Explains Its Real Meaning

And then they just flat out call for its retirement.

Is it time to retire 'Baby, It's Cold Outside'?

The left might think they are woke and on the right side of history in the wake of the #MeToo movement — but how shocked do you think they'd be if they knew Glenn beat them to the punch over a decade ago? Don't believe me? Take a listen to this clip from our audio vault from 2008.

How long until we follow in Europe's footsteps?


Christmas should be a time of happiness and celebration the world over. But in Europe, it is now the season of terror. The sounds at Europe's famous Christmas Markets of "Merry Christmas!" and laughter are rapidly being replaced with the sounds of "Allahu Ackbar!" and gunfire. Two years ago ISIS attacked a Christmas Market in Berlin, killing twelve and injuring another forty-eight. And tragically, the sound of automatic gunfire and the chant of "Allahu Ackbar!" was heard at another Christmas Market in Europe yesterday afternoon… this time in France.

Two people are dead and thirteen are battling for their lives right now in Strasbourg, France. The attacker walked into the city's Christmas Market shortly after 8pm, shouted "Allahu Ackbar" and began shooting indiscriminately. He then proceeded to battle the police in four separate locations while he fled the scene. As of this moment, he still hasn't been caught. The city of Strasbourg is on full lockdown, and France's terror level has been elevated.

RELATED: Paris pandemonium: Here's what happens when people feel ignored

A man of Middle Eastern descent has been identified as the suspect. He was already on a terror watchlist and had been deported from Germany recently with twenty criminal convictions. He's well known in Islamist circles and was reportedly radicalized after spending time in prison. Apparently he was too radical for the Germans… but not for France.

What is it going to take for progressive governments like France to wake up to their failed policies? Nearly 300 people have been killed in terror attacks in France over the past three years. 300 in three years! But despite that, the French government refuses to address immigration, they continue their open border policy and - more importantly - they refuse to listen to their people when they try and tell them that they're scared to death over this issue. Instead they get a lecture on Islamophobia… "that's the real problem."

Outrage has replaced baseball as our national pastime.

This is one of the reasons why the Yellow Vests are tearing the country apart. The government refuses to listen to their fears on terrorism, unchecked immigration, open borders, the failing economy, high taxes and out of control spending. Wow... do these issues sound at all familiar? How many years behind France are we? Just listen to ourselves.

Outrage has replaced baseball as our national pastime. People have lost the ability to engage in peaceful protest. Street demonstrations have turned into street brawls. Have you seen the images from places like Portland lately? European governments are losing the social contract with their people. After years of broken promises and outright lies from Washington, how long before that happens here?

The Congressional reckoning for the giants of Silicon Valley continued yesterday. This time it was finally Google CEO Sundar Pichai's [Soon-dar Pa-shy] turn in the hot seat. There were protesters. There was Alex Jones and Roger Stone sitting beside each other. Good times were had by all. Pichai remained soft-spoken and calm throughout the grilling. It was his first time testifying before Congress. And you know what they say about your first time – that you should never admit to having even a hint of anti-conservative bias. We start there right now…

In his opening statement, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said:

I lead this company without political bias and work to ensure that our products continue to operate that way. To do otherwise would go against our core principles and our business interests.

RELATED: Still want to believe Google isn't evil? Then don't listen to THIS interview

Congressmen from both parties were not convinced of Google's innocence. For three and a half hours, they let Pichai have it from all angles. Republican Iowa Representative Steve King asked Pichai to disclose the names of over 1,000 Google employees that work on Google's search algorithm, so that their social media accounts could be examined for liberal bias. Pichai did not hand over the list.

Meanwhile, at least one Democrat, Tennessee's Steve Cohen, feels Google has the opposite problem. He complained to Pichai that Google overuses conservative news organizations in their search results. Pichai insisted that Google employees do not favor certain news outlets over others.

Pichai saved his most artful question-dodging for the China issue. Lawmakers wanted to know about "Project Dragonfly," the communist-friendly version of Google's search engine that the company has been working on in collaboration with the Chinese government. Pichai said:

It's a limited effort internally currently.

When asked whether Google is in current discussions with the Chinese government about Project Dragonfly, Pichai replied:

…I'm happy to be transparent to the extent we take steps toward launching a product in China." Which sounds like a definite maybe.

But then, Democrats got back to the much more urgent Google issues at hand. Like Zoe Lofgren of California who asked why Donald Trump's photo pops up when you Google the word "idiot."

And to think your tax dollars helped subsidize this enlightening Q & A.