Glenn: The Left only sees DOOM in a sunset

AFP Contributor / Contributor | Getty Images

In everyday language, talking about the weather is the simplest form of conversation. It’s small talk at its finest, and it is beautiful in its simplicity, its ability to connect people through the joys and tragedies of nature.

But on the Left, discussion about the weather is an excuse to push doom. In the media, it’s a way to gain prestige and collect awards. In academia, it’s a way to score clout and publish articles. In politics, it’s a way to get votes and build power.

On the Left, discussion about the weather is an excuse to push doom.

And in all three, it’s a reliable way to make money. Lots of it. They have turned climate doom into an industry and a religion. And the tool they use is fear.

I began gathering articles that framed climate change as an apocalypse that will happen at any moment. We had to stop because every major mainstream outlet has pushed this tired agenda.

In this month alone, USA Todaytried to shame Republicans into "climatism." Every major outlet including ABC Newsand The Associated Pressreduced this summer’s heat waves to climate change despite pre-Industrial weather patterns, and The Chicago Tribunewarned that the Windy City is slowly sinking from something called “underground climate change” — climate change is underground now, too?!?

Oh, and the Atlantic Ocean’s current system could collapse within a year and a half, according to CNN’s “chief climate reporter,” Bill Weir, a man Forbes described as the “Anthony Bourdain of climate reporting” (notice how the Left deifies the people who sell us doom?).

Senate Democrats held a hearing devoted to climate change... for the ELEVENTH time. During the Senate Budget Committee, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) rebuked them for the hearing, aptly titled "Beyond the Breaking Point: The Fiscal Consequences of Climate Change on Infrastructure."

"Our nation is over $32 trillion in debt, yet this committee is holding the 11th hearing on climate change,” he said. "President Biden is on television bragging about his economic performance when Americans can’t afford groceries and gasoline. Our spending is out of control, and Democrats haven’t written a budget in the past two years."

He continues:

I fought for renewable energy long before climate change became such a politically popular topic. Democrats called this hearing to discuss the fiscal impact of climate change on infrastructure. I imagine we’ll hear some expensive estimates and alarming anecdotes about the impact of severe weather events on infrastructure. But there isn’t a single expert in this room who is qualified as a climate scientist to attribute those estimates and anecdotes explicitly to climate change.

There isn’t a single expert in this room who is qualified as a climate scientist to attribute those estimates and anecdotes explicitly to climate change.

He’s absolutely right.

We need to consider the shady history of climate hysteria, which, unlike climate change, ACTUALLY grows more severe by the day.

In "The Great Reset," Klaus Schwab constantly conflates climate change with medical crises. Covid is connected to the climate, air pollution, and even animals. He talks about climate change as the “environmental virus.”

Just this week, the World Health Organization insisted that climate change will supercharge mosquito-borne diseases.

This is a reliable trick of authoritarians: One of the surest ways to get people to surrender their freedom is to promise them safety and “health.” But, as usual, these doomsayers are the ones who are sick.

One of the surest ways to get people to surrender their freedom is to promise them safety and “health."

They look up at the same sky that you do, they see the same tremendous world. But, to them, a sunset is just another sign of doom. They can’t enjoy anything, not even the glow of nature’s most beautiful moments.

They should listen to the words of David:

When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have set in place, what is man that you are mindful of him, and the son of man that you care for him? (Psalm 8:3-5).

COVID is back! Or that is what we’re being told anyway...

A recent spike in COVID cases has triggered the left's alarm bells, and the following institutions have begun to reinstate COVID-era mandates. You might want to avoid them if you enjoy breathing freely...

Do YOU think institutions should bring back COVID-era mandates if cases increase? Let us know your thoughts HERE.

Morris Brown College

Both of Upstate Medical's hospitals in Syracuse, New York

Corey Henry / Senior Staff Photographer | The Daily Orange

Auburn Community Hospital, New York

Kevin Rivoli / The Citizen | Auburn Pub

Lionsgate Studio

AaronP/Bauer-Griffin / Contributor | GETTY IMAGES

United Health Services in New York

Kaiser Permanente in California

Justin Sullivan / Staff | GETTY IMAGES

There was a time when both the Left and the Right agreed that parents have the final say in raising their children... Not anymore.

In the People's Republic of California, the STATE, not parents, will determine whether children should undergo transgender treatments. The California state legislature just passed a law that will require judges in child custody cases to consider whether parents support a child’s gender transition. According to the law, the state now thinks total affirmation is an integral part of a child’s “health, safety, and welfare.”

We are inching closer to a dystopia where the state, not the parents, have ultimate rights over their children, a history that people from former Soviet nations would feign repeating.

Glenn dove into the law AND MORE in this episode titled, "Parental Advisory: The EXPLICIT plot to control YOUR kids." To get all the research that went into this episode AND information on how YOU can fight back, enter your email address below:

If you didn't catch Wednesday night's Glenn TV special, be sure to check it out HERE!

The Biden admin has let in MORE illegal aliens than the populations of THESE 15 states

GUILLERMO ARIAS / Contributor | Getty Images

There are currently an estimated 16.8 MILLION illegal aliens residing in the United States as of June 2023, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). This number is already 1.3 million higher than FAIR's January 2022 estimate of 15.5 million and a 2.3 million increase from its end-of-2020 estimate. Even Democrats like New York City's Mayor Adams Mayor Adams are waking up to what Conservatives have been warning for years: we are in a border CRISIS.

However, this isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010. In the first two years of the Biden administration alone, the illegal alien population increased by 16 PERCENT nationwide, imposing a whopping net cost of $150.6 BILLION PER YEAR on American taxpayers. That is nearly DOUBLE the total amount that the Biden administration has sent to Ukraine.

This isn't the same border crisis that Republicans were warning about back in 2010.

These large numbers often make it difficult to conceptualize the sheer impact of illegal immigration on the United States. To put it in perspective, we have listed ALL 15 states and the District of Colombia that have smaller populations than the 2.3 MILLION illegal immigrants, who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration. That is more than the entire populations of Wyoming, Vermont, and South Dakota COMBINED—and the American taxpayers have to pay the price.

Here are all 16 states/districts that have FEWER people than the illegal immigrants who have entered the U.S. under the Biden administration.

1. New Mexico

Population: 2,110,011

2. Idaho

Population: 1,973,752

3. Nebraska

Population: 1,972,292

4. West Virginia

Population: 1,764,786

5. Hawaii

Population: 1,433,238

6. New Hampshire

Population: 1,402,957

7. Maine

Population: 1,393,442

8. Montana

Population: 1,139,507

9. Rhode Island

Population: 1,090,483

10. Delaware

Population: 1,031,985

11. South Dakota

Population: 923,484

12. North Dakota

Population: 780,588

13. Alaska

Population: 732,984

14. Washington DC

Population: 674,815

15. Vermont

Population: 647,156

16. Wyoming

Population: 583,279

POLL: Should the Government control the future of AI?

The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

Earlier this week, tech titans, lawmakers, and union leaders met on Capitol Hill to discuss the future of AI regulation. The three-hour meeting boasted an impressive roster of tech leaders including, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and others, along with more than 60 US Senators.

Tech Titans and Senators gathered in the Kennedy Caucus Room.The Washington Post / Contributor | Getty Images

The meeting was closed to the public, so what was exactly discussed is unknown. However, what we do know is that a majority of the CEOs support AI regulation, the most vocal of which is Elon Musk. During the meeting, Musk called AI "a double-edged sword" and strongly pushed for regulation in the interest of public safety.

A majority of the CEOs support AI regulation.

Many other related issues were discussed, including the disruption AI has caused to the job market. As Glenn has discussed on his program, the potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real, and many have already felt the effects. From taxi drivers to Hollywood actors and writers, AI's presence can be felt everywhere and lawmakers are unsure how to respond.

The potential for AI to alter or destroy jobs is very real.

Ultimately, the meeting's conclusion was less than decisive, with several Senators making comments to the tune of "we need more time before we act." The White House is expected to release an executive order regarding AI regulation by the end of the year. But now it's YOUR turn to tell us what YOU think needs to be done!

Should A.I. be regulated?

Can the government be trusted with the power to regulate A.I.? 

Can Silicon Valley be trusted to regulate AI? 

Should AI development be slowed for safety, despite its potential advantages?

If a job can be done cheaper and better by AI, should it be taken away from a human?

Do you feel that your job is threatened by AI?