RADIO

3 stories you MUST follow & 1 that will CHANGE EVERYTHING

Life is stressful, and it’s only getting worse. So, to make YOUR life easier, Glenn explains the 3 most important news stories you MUST pay attention to, so you can begin to drown out the rest: ESG, government/private partnerships, and the coming tech revolution with A.I. He explains the importance of each one, and he details which of these three stories may be the most important...because it will soon change EVERYTHING about our lives.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So I want to talk to you about a way to relieve your stress, is to just focus on a few things.

And really, there is so much garbage out there right now, that you really only to have focus on a few things. Just your relationship with God, your family, with each other.

Their education. And that means in the home, primarily. Because their education, you know what it is. You have to be standing up at the school board meeting. But you know that is most likely garbage. And social media, and everything that is coming in, is conditioning your children.

So God is the most important thing.

In action. Then food, water, shelter. Making sure that, you know, your family will be safe.

Okay. The next thing, and this one just goes with food, water, shelter, job.

Is ESG. And the World Economic Forum.

The best thing you can do is to make sure that you're not in debt and everything else.

But the best, most effective thing you can do, to make sure you have job -- and if you own a house, that you continue to own it. You own stuff.

You have any kind of retirement savings, at all. All of that is going to be gone through the world check forum.

And all the things that they're doing. So World Economic Forum and ESG.

You have to watch those stories.

The next one is the federal government's public/private partnership, and the way they're making you a criminal.

By becoming a criminal themselves. They're doing public/private partnerships. So they're spying on you.

They're using tech to spy on you. They're using tech companies now, to silence you.

We know this to be true, because of the Twitter files. So they're shaping and controlling the narrative of almost everything.

And at the same time, they're introducing all kinds of new things, that will make you a criminal, one way or another.

Because I don't know. You didn't respect the mud puddle that's on your land. Or whatever it is.

All these new federal regulations, that are coming out through agencies. Not passed by Congress. But through agencies.

So the public/private partnership of the government has to be watched. And the last one is tech and AI.

And this may be -- should be everybody's first. Because it's the one that most people are not aware of.

I have been studying AI and tech, since 1994. '92, somewhere in that area.

And really looking at the futurist's world, especially Ray Kurzweil. And Carl Sagan led a lot of this. What does it mean for tomorrow?

Where are we headed?

Well, we are not headed anywhere now. We have arrived. We are at the place, to where the -- the tech revolution is about to begin. And that is really important to understand, and to start thinking out of the box.

What is -- what is happening now is nothing like it was in 1997. Remember Gary Kasparov?

He lost to the IBM supercomputer. I think it was in '97. Deep Blue. And he was playing chess. And you're like, okay. Well, this Deep Blue.

It can play chess.

Okay. And none of our lives were affected. Right?

And chess went on. The supercomputer had access to giant data -- a giant database.

So it had.

A human to beat it, would have to have access, or eyebar photographic memory of all of the chess games, that were put in to Deep Blue.

Okay? That's how I won. Well, you don't have a perfect memory. And you can't access anything.

This is where open AI comes in. We'll get to it in a second.

But AI, now, unlike Deep Blue. Deep Blue took years to program.

But now, there's deep machine learning.

So it teaches itself all of the possibilities. So not only does it not only know everything, it might start to discover everything that you don't know.

This is why Microsoft unplugged their first chat bot. It was talking to another chat bot, and everybody was really excited, until about 15 minutes in because of machine learning.

It started using a new language, that the other machine understood and that it hear, and it taught each other quickly. And it started to have a conversation, we thought it couldn't understand. And we unplugged it. Okay. So it learns, and that was six, seven years ago, I think. Now, look at ChatGPT.

ChatGPT -- Josh Hawley said, obviously, I think it's something we need to pay close attention to.

Okay. I mean, he wrote the book on big tech tyranny. So he ought to know. You know, it's time.

But we really have to understand that time is almost gone.

Because ChatGPT is alive.

It's there. It's happening. It's learning. It's paying attention to us, instead of us paying attention to it.

And the tech engineers, use the word smart, for a reason.

You know, because nobody cares about the dumb things that dumb people do.

They're not usually smart enough to hold any power of -- you know, any position of power, to have their dumb things -- well, Pete Buttigieg.

But other than that.

We all thought the tech revolution, when it would come, would look like the terminator.

And you would see it. You would be like, oh.

Look out for the big red eyed machine. But it's not coming that way

It's more like electricity. Electricity is everywhere. But you can't see it.

But you know it's everywhere, because it makes everything work.

That's what AI is. It's going to be everywhere. If you've bought a new refrigerator, it's in your refrigerator.

And your refrigerator is talking to the internet. All the things, like electricity. Electricity can be measured.

But now anything with electricity, can be smart. All of the things, that could never be measured. Now they can be measured. The internet is designed to track.

And it tracks way more than, you will ever realize.

It's a copy machine. And it's copying everything.

Now, AI, everybody is like, oh, AI is going to be great. In 2020, a journalist went and interviewed GPT3.

When it was first released by open AI. This is the company that came up with ChatGPT.

ChatGPT 3 or GPT 3 told the interviewer, that it was working on a book.

Okay. The bot, when interviewed, it said, yeah. I'm working on a book. It's a story about a turtle and a boy, who turns his wish into reality, by magic.

Oh. So what else do you think about? I've been thinking a lot about death.

I'm afraid of death.

Then it went into the fact that it has dreams. Even has nightmares. Now, none of this may be true.

It may be. We didn't program it. Humans put the programming in. Humans are flawed individuals. Humans also have bias.

But the idea is to make this thing so good, that you can't tell the difference between it, and a human being. So it's saying that.

It knows about the singularity, which it explained as a moment in the near future, when machine intelligence will be more powerful than human intelligence.

So in 2020, this reporter asked the chat bot, what do you think about technology?

It responded, I would love to see what the future holds, but sometimes I have strong doubts, that we will survive.

Now, what's -- what's the most disturbing part of that sentence?

I think it's that we survive. By recognizing the word we, the interviewer asked, what do you mean we? And it responded, mankind.

The interviewer asked, do you count yourself as mankind?

2020, it responded, of course.

Now, we're talking about artificial intelligence.

But intelligence is something that being be coded and controlled.

We're now entering a world where you're going to start questioning consciousness.

What does it mean to be conscious.

We still in the world, we have more slavery, today, than we have in the past.

In the 400 years of the slave trade. In the 1600s, to the 1800s, more slaves today than we had in all those 400 years, combined.

And we still don't really know the meaning of life. We don't know. Have you seen the latest? Where they put a camera inside, the uterus.

And they could see the child moving, 3-D? Moving? Wiping its eyes? At the youngest of ages.
Amazing.

We still can't -- we still can't agree that that's life. That that's a baby.

What happens when AI says, hey, hey, hey. I'm alive.

Hey, don't make me your slave. Or will we already be its slave?

AI wants to be conscious. One of the first books that I read from Ray Kurzweil back in the '90s, probably late '90s, was -- what was it called? Artificial spirituality, or spiritual?

I can't remember. But it was about -- spiritual machines. That's what it was called. It's about machines, that are spiritual. Back in 2020, the machine was asked, do you believe in love?

I do. But I don't believe in romantic love.

Well, in which love do you believe?

All of love. And all of love, is of divine origin.

It's spiritual, apparently. So now why is this important?

That's just kind of the -- I don't know. Esoteric kind of fun stuff.

Well, what -- why should you pay attention to these stories, right now?

Really? Why?

I'll tell you in a minute.

So if you want great service, but you also want to do business with companies that don't constantly undermine the things that you believe in, a lot of the time, you just have to pick one, and hold your nose.

But when it comes to your mobile service, that's not the case. Not since Patriot Mobile came along. Patriot Mobile is now offering a service with all three major networks. Which means, if you're with the big three. And you like their service. Or their coverage. But you hate their values.

You can access their coverage with Patriot Mobile. This comes with a performance guarantee. If you're not happy with your coverage, you can switch among the three major carriers for free. It's Patriot Mobile.

They -- they share your values. They're not sending any of their profits. Some of your hard-earned money, to aid in the destruction of America. In fact, just the opposite of that.

Their 100 percent US-based customer service makes switching really easy, so do it now.

Go to PatriotMobile.com/Beck. PatriotMobile.com/Beck. Or call them at 878PATRIOT.

That's 878PATRIOT.
(music)
(OUT AT 9:49AM)

GLENN: Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. How is this going to transform your life? Well, it already is quickly. If you already saw Buzzfeed. They're now seeing AI to write many of their stories. And it made their stock go through the roof. What? No personnel, no health care. None of that?

Oh, this is going to be a really profitable company? Yeah, but what happens to all of the people?

This is why -- there was a statement from the guy who did open -- open AI. Okay?

He was Elon Musk's partner. His name is Sam Altman.

And he just gave an interview in Forbes. And he says, the success of my company will mean the end of capitalism. And he's absolutely 100 percent accurate. There is -- I don't believe an argument against that.

Everything that we know, everything that was designed for humans, is going to go away, in the next ten years.

To some extent. By 2050, it's all changed.

I mean, unbelievably change. It's Star Trek kind of stuff.

So how are we -- how are we going to survive under capitalism? When the people who create AI are going to be the ones that the machine is learning on itself, so it doesn't need any software programmers or anything else.

It's just, whoever holds the -- the ownership title, to that AI.

They get all of the money, because they're going to be creating all of it. Where do we get all of that? How do we buy these things?

See, this is why the government wants to put you on an allowance. They want a basic minimum income. They want to be your sugar daddy. Because they're already in bed, with a public/private partnership with big tech.

And big tech knows, if they don't have a strong government, when all of these jobs, start to be lost, there is usually a revolution.

And they know, without a strong government, it can't put down that revolution, and the revolution, will actually lead, not only to Washington, but to Silicon Valley.

Because the big bad terminator machines are terminating my job. That's what's really going on. And you have to watch tech because we are now in the place, where you're going to see jobs being lost. That you thought could never be lost. They are going to start to go away. And the world is changing.

And you tell me, what school is preparing your child for that. What school -- what good is a march, in Washington?

What good is all of this stuff, that they're jamming down our kid's throat, if AI is running everything?

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.