RADIO

Biden LIES about inflation & ACTUALLY thinks America will buy it

Both President Biden and Nancy Pelosi ACTUALLY tried to convince the American people over the weekend that massive government spending does NOT lead to inflation. In fact, they argued, it will FIX it instead. Umm…we’re not stupid! Although, Biden disagrees. He admitted that he basically thinks American voters are fools who 'don't understand' his policy moves. Listen to the audio in this clip to find out exactly what Joe Biden thinks of YOUR intelligence…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program.

First of all, let's welcome Pat Gray.

PAT: Thank you. Great to be here.

GLENN: Is it? You wouldn't want to be anyplace else.

PAT: Nowhere else. If I could choose any place to be, it would be right here.

GLENN: Not Disney. Not some exotic vacation. Not even at home in bed.

PAT: No. Right here.

GLENN: That is great.

PAT: Isn't it?

GLENN: That's the kind of detection you get from Pat Gray, from Pat Gray Unleashed. He's got a passion for being here.

Pat, how are you?

PAT: I'm good.

GLENN: Good. What is on your mind today? What is it that you see?

PAT: That there's no trouble in the world. I'm very excited about the fact that everything has been fixed. Except for the things that Putin keeps screwing up.

It pisses me off. Everything would be perfect if it weren't for him. We would have a great economy.

Gas prices would be incredibly low. You could buy a house for 198. Putin. Ugh! Dang it!

GLENN: I know. I hate him for that. Could we play Americans don't understand what we're doing clip, please?

BIDEN: Never forget what we've accomplished together, so far.

And, by the way, the American people are just trying to stay above water. They don't understand this.

You tell them what the American Recovery Act was, they look at you, like, what are you talking about?

PAT: They're so stupid, the American people.

GLENN: Yeah. They are so stupid.

They are so stupid. And they don't understand that Putin has caused inflation.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: And can I tell you something?

It's simply not true about government spending. Listen to this.

VOICE: Having this discussion, it's important to dispel some of those who say, well, it's the government spending.

No, it isn't. The government spending is doing the exact reverse. Reducing the national debt is not inflationary.

STU: Government spending is reducing the national debt?

GLENN: Yes. Okay. Look. Look it.

You're married.

STU: Yes.

GLENN: Okay. My wife is married to me. You're married to Lisa.

Lisa and I have a lot of things in common. For instance, honey, we're saving money, by sending this money.

STU: I've heard that sort of pitch.

GLENN: Yes. We're saving money by spending this money right now.

STU: Yes.

GLENN: And who doesn't know the basic principle. When you're in debt, if you go out and put more things on the credit card, you're actually not adding to debt.

You're making things better. Don't think that through.

I mean, that's what she's saying.

That's what she's saying.

We're not adding to debt. How are you not adding to debt?

STU: Well, what we did with the money we spent was buy counterfeit money machines. And now we're counterfeiting money, being in debt.

GLENN: Okay. Good. Well, they're already kind of doing it. It's called Fiat currency. But that's a different story. Here's the president. He gets a little testy. Cut three, please.

BIDEN: I'm sick of this stuff. We have to talk about it. Because the American people think the reason why we have inflation is because the government is spending more money. Simply not true.

GLENN: How?

STU: Now, the Treasury Secretary of the Obama administration Larry Summers said it was true.

One of their lead economists, firm in,also said that was true.

And obviously, every conservative economist says this as well.

But it's just simply not true. It's simple.

PAT: Just because he says it.

GLENN: He's sick of it too.

PAT: Yes, he is.

GLENN: Have you noticed that he seems a little angry a lot of the time.

STU: Yeah. Or a lot angry, a lot of the time.

GLENN: Yeah. Or a lot angry, at just off the -- off the cuff. Just kind of like, hey. I like -- I like chocolate ice cream!

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: It's not true that I don't like vanilla ice cream.

I mean, he goes from zero to 60 in a heartbeat.

STU: There's a little bit of old manuals at cloud going on, you know.

There's something -- it's not normal. He seems to burst into real visceral anger out of nowhere.

GLENN: No. It is normal. It is normal.

PAT: For a super old guy who is losing cognitive functions.

GLENN: Yeah. That is super normal. We've all seen that in our family.

STU: In that situation, it's true.

PAT: It's not normal for a president.

GLENN: No.

STU: And you think about, how he's losing it in front of crowds, and at the press, who has done nothing, but coddle him through this presidency.

He's mad at them. Imagine what he's like behind closed doors.

I've heard that he is angry at the drop of a hot, a lot.

PAT: I'll bet he is.

GLENN: In the White House.

PAT: Well, his presidency is going down the drain.

I don't know how you savage it, at this point.

And he's pissed off that people are noticing it.

GLENN: And yet they're talking about it this weekend, thinking seriously he will run for reelection.

PAT: I know. That's insane.

GLENN: No. That's not insane. The head-to-head polls, between him and Trump, it's a dead heat.

Are you -- are you -- I'm -- what?

STU: I mean, look, my wife says this to me, all the time. Speaking of my wife. She's always like, how can -- I don't understand, how can anyone think this could be close? And how is it possible?

And it's like, well, we all sat here and complained for four years about the media, turning Donald Trump into Satan.

Well, that has an effect. Donald Trump is going to -- if he runs, when it seems like he will. He has the nomination locked up pretty much, on his side, in the primary. But he's going to face this same treatment.

And multiple years of him being turned into Satan by the media. It won't be a cakewalk for Donald Trump, if he runs.

I mean, they have -- we all sat here, and day by day, cataloged --

GLENN: He can't afford to lose this.

STU: How bad the media was against him. And complained about it. And said it was unfair. But it was. But it was real. And it occurred. And they will go back and reverse themselves completely to anything negative that Joe Biden has done. All the -- whatever skeptical --

PAT: They're already trying to do it in realtime.

STU: Yeah. It's going to be -- and their groundwork is already done.

It's going to be a challenge. President Trump, if he runs, it won't be a cakewalk. It will be hard. And he will have that same awful treatment from the media. He will have to overcome. And we've seen how difficult that is. Even for Donald Trump, who is very good with dealing with the media.

GLENN: So I would -- no. This is never going to happen. But I would love -- I would love to see president Trump endorse DeSantis. And then take the role from Nancy Pelosi.

STU: The Speaker of the House thing.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. Can you imagine?

He would tear it apart. The Speaker of the House?

STU: He doesn't have to be in Congress, to be Speaker of the House, right?

GLENN: No. All he has to do is the ruling party, we would like him, Speaker of the House.

PAT: Don't you think they would do that -- if he wanted it. I don't know that he would want it.

GLENN: Could you imagine?

Because then he is actually responsible for all the investigations.

He would be responsible for, yeah. We'll do a little investigation on Hunter Biden. We'll look into that one.

We'll do a little investigation into -- into the Democrats, that were here, and doing my impeachment.

We're just going to look into that. He could improve it. He wouldn't be on the -- on the committees.

He might be.

But he would be the one that would be, we're doing it.

Can you imagine?

Because that may be a more important role.

Because if you want to clean out the hornet's nest, you have to do it through Congress.

You have to do it. The president could sign all kinds of executive orders, do this and that. But that doesn't last.

And if the president wants to fire, clean house at the State Department. All of you, out.

He can't do that without Congress.

If he's the Speaker of the House, and Ron DeSantis is the president, I think you have a one-two punch.

STU: Hmm. This is a bit of fantasy league we're playing here.

It would be interesting.

I don't think Trump would have as much interest in that role.

GLENN: You have presidents go back and be in Congress.

If it's good enough for John Quincy Adams, if John Quincy Adams was willing to do it. And John Quincy Adams, in the end, is the reason why we got rid of slavery. He tried and tried and tried. And then he saw this upcomer, who just came to Congress. And he said, you get it.

And he -- and he tutored that young congressman, on how to stop slavery. And that young congressman became the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln.

I don't know.

I think it might be good. It's -- it's not a joke, to be in Congress. It is now.

STU: No. No.

GLENN: Because Congress isn't doing anything. We send all these representatives, and it's really only Schumer and McConnell, and Pelosi, and maybe McCarthy that are getting together in the rooms, saying, yeah. We're going to do this. And then just send it to everybody to rubber stamp. That's the problem.

STU: It will be fascinating to see.

GLENN: Yeah. By the way, have you seen all the things in the spending bill. That we didn't know about. Because nobody read the bill.

STU: All stuff cutting inflation.

GLENN: Yeah. People just don't understand it.

STU: Why don't you get it? It's cutting inflation.

PAT: And there wouldn't be any, if it weren't for Putin. Damn Putin. I don't like that guy. I hate him.

STU: You're really angry, Pat.

PAT: I'm really angry at Putin. Dang it!

GLENN: So you really think that it's not printing of money?

PAT: No. It's Putin. That's an absolute lie.

I'm sick of it. It's Putin.

STU: But he started -- Putin. What don't you understand about Putin?

I want to scream his name.

Is it that not tell you, it's Putin!
(laughter)

STU: Fair point.

GLENN: I think I get it now.

I think the American people get it. Thank you very much, Pat.

RADIO

How the WHO's 'pandemic treaty' could CONTROL governments

On May 22nd, the World Health Assembly — which is the governing body of The World Health Organization — will meet in Switzerland to discuss next steps for its ‘pandemic treaty [and its] quest to use public health to expand The WHO’s power over sovereign states,’ Daniel Horowitz reports for TheBlaze. He explains how certain amendments to be added to this treaty could ‘allow the director-general of the WHO to declare a public health emergency in a country and unilaterally coerce its citizens to take certain actions.’ The far-left and global elite continue to destroy our sovereignty, Glenn says, and this is just one more step toward their desired global government.

Read more: https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-states-mus...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I read some stuff this morning. I've been doing some research on what's happening with the WHO. And I read their stuff today, that will make your head explode. And is really evil and important.

But let me give you this today, from -- from Daniel Horowitz at TheBlaze. States must preemptively nullify any WHO international pandemic regulation.

I'm going to read it verbatim because it's just so well-written. And now is the time, that things are shifting. We're going to. There's going to be a New World Order out there. And we've got to lead it. And we have to unite the rest of the free world in doing it. That's Joe Biden. March 21st, 2022.

Any Republican that is running without mentioning your intent to fight the global pandemic treaty or regulations, might as well run as a Democrat. This is really super important, and it is beginning to happen next week. On May 22nd, the world health assembly, the governing body of the World Health Organization, is going to meet in Geneva Switzerland to discuss the next step in its pandemic treaty. And the quest to use public health to expand the WHO's power over sovereign states. Representatives from 193 nations, including the US, will be attending the only country, not invited is Taiwan.

Gee, I wonder why. So what is this treaty? On January 24th, 2022, the director general of the WHO explained the treaty was a priority, to urgently strength the WHO, as leading and the director authority on global health, at the center of the global health architecture. He laid out the guiding principle of this plot. We, quote, all want a world in which science triumphs over misinformation. Solidarity triumphs over division. And equity is a reality, not an aspiration. He said, we are one world, we have one health. We are one WHO.

Now, this has not been announced. Biden has not even spoken about it. They are deathly quiet about this. But they're going to be approving amendments. The proposed amendments are essentially going to allow the director general of the WHO to declare public health emergencies in any country. And unilaterally coerce its citizens to take certain actions. Here's one of the amendments, a critical section from article nine. The WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the state party, whose territory the event is allegedly occurring. But this is the way it's going to read. Now, WHO may take into account, reports from sources of other than notifications or consultations -- consultations shall assess these reports, according to established principles. And then communicate information on the event, to the state party, in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring.

Now, they have scratched out, before taking any action based on reports, the WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the state party. That's all gone. They're taking that out.

So WHO gets information, has reports, and they can act without verifying with the president or anybody else.

Why would you be erasing the requirement, for the WHO to consult with the government?

Number four. If the state party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO, it used to say, May. It now says, WHO shall -- when justified by the magnitude of public health risk, immediately share with other state parties, the information available, whilst encouraging the state party to accept the offer of collaboration, by the WHO. It used to say there, while taking into accounts the views of the state party concerned.

So they're erasing all of our sovereignty. This is going to be another thing. They're going to say, is a conspiracy theory. It is not. You can look it all up. It is the world health agenda. From the World Health Organization. They are meeting in Geneva, on May 22nd. So that's next week. They are intentionally quiet on this.

Because they know the power. Now, we also know what the WHO is. You remember, when everybody was saying, we have to get out of the WHO.

They're just a tool of China. Why would you say that?

Forget that I mentioned that Taiwan is the only country that is not invited to this in Geneva.

PAT: Yeah. That's completely -- completely irrelevant.

GLENN: Completely. Amen, brother.

PAT: I don't even know why you brought it up in the first place.

GLENN: Thank you. Thank you.

PAT: It's a good thing they weren't actually -- I wish we weren't invited to it.

GLENN: Well, I will tell you this. Another reason why Donald Trump. They fought so hard to keep him out: Because he wouldn't have --

PAT: He sure wouldn't have. That's exactly right.

GLENN: He wouldn't have empowered the WHO.

PAT: Well, he took us out of the WHO.

GLENN: That's exactly right. And this president is not only putting us back, they're taking away our sovereignty.

And so it's one more piece to the global governance of the left. Warning.

Shorts

Kamala repeats herself 5 TIMES in 30 seconds…

Kamala Harris, America's no. 2 in command, just spoke at a climate change conference. So how'd you think she did? Was she eloquent and able to lay out a vision for a better world? Probably not, but check this video out and let's all find out.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Right vs. Left: The Time for Compromise Is OVER | Jesse Kelly | Ep 146

The Left worked for decades to get control, and now they have it: “Every cultural pillar has been infected and taken over,” Jesse Kelly warns Glenn. So, it’s time to get out of the stands and onto the field. On this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," the host of the nationally syndicated "Jesse Kelly Show" joins with a blunt message for the Right: The time for compromise is gone. This system that’s raising young people who hate America can’t be salvaged, and while taking back Congress in 2022 would be nice, LOCAL victories are what really matter. But this won’t be a quick fight. Thankfully, Jesse has some solutions, and they involve Play-Doh …

Shorts

Where are our STANDARDS, America?

Since when are we the people that throw our hands up and accept the new normal?

We're the people, that despite all odds, we took it on. We didn't settle for less. And that's what they're telling you to do now, settle for less.

No. That's not who we are. Why would we be willing to sit around and wait for the government to fix it?

Don't lower your standards. That's un-American. We don't lower our standards. We raise standards. And that is our legacy.