RADIOJanuary 11, 2024

Are Biden's mood swings getting OUT OF CONTROL?

President Biden has appeared to have some pretty severe mood swings in recent weeks. At times, he's slow and has to be led by the First Lady. At other times, he's foaming at the mouth over threats to "Democracy." Glenn and Stu discuss whether Biden is just acting or are these signs of something more concerning. They also discuss how disturbing it is that Biden bragged about sentencing January 6th "insurrectionists" to prison, even though none of them were charged with insurrection. And apparently, the government isn't stopping there ...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Oh, man. Is Stu not here yet! Is Stu not here! I miss Stu. Hi, Stu.

STU: Hi, Glenn. How is it going?

GLENN: Really bad, okay. At the same time, really good. The mood swings of Biden are terrifying.

People say, you know, Donald Trump, I mean, he could get out of control, and go for vengeance.

What the hell do you think is happening right now with Joe Biden? Did you see the speech he gave over January 6th?

STU: As much of it as I could take, and I did realize watching it, that the real tragedy January 6th for the Democrats is that in an election year, it fell on a Saturday. So that no one was paying attention, because this is their whole idea.

Their whole campaign was to talk about January 6th constantly. And everybody missed the big speech.

GLENN: Yeah. I know. I know. I know.

I mean, there was at least one person that I never heard of on MSNBC that was sobbing. He really had a hard time getting it together. Hey, Sara, do you have like, I don't know?

The Glenn theme or something -- something that's very, very stirring, that you can play. The MSNBC clip, where the -- the anchor is talking to a Capitol police officer.

STU: Powerful.

GLENN: It's very powerful. Go ahead.

VOICE: It is --

GLENN: No. Stop. Not that feed. You know, America the beautiful, kind of thing.

STU: Oh. Oh.

GLENN: Yeah. Okay. Here we go.

VOICE: Mail-in ballot.

Former DC Metropolitan police officer, Courage for America council member, and author of Hold the Line, the insurrection. And, one cop's battle for America's soul.

Officer Fanone, I'm going to try to get through this.

STU: Oh, no.

VOICE: Thank you for what you did, three years ago today.

GLENN: You look at the cop who is looking at this guy like, what the hell is happening? I'm not here. I'm invisible. I'm invisible. I'm invisible.

Okay. Well, it was a very, very scary, scary time on January 6th. Well, especially Ashley Babette. But let's not talk about that.

Very scary went. And here's what the president said in his speech.

VOICE: Today, we gather in the new year. Some 246 years later. Just one day before January 6th.

A day forever seared this our memory, because it was on that day, that we nearly lost America. Lost it all.

Today, we're here to answer the most important of questions. Is democracy still America's sacred cause?

GLENN: No. The republic is. The republic is.

I mean, it's could you tell with that democracy thing, seeing you're president of the United States.

Then he goes on to celebrate, sending January 6ers into prison. Go ahead.

BIDEN: Since that day, more than 1,200 people have been charged with assault on the Capitol. There will be 900 of them.

GLENN: Okay. Stop. Stop. Stop.

Hold it just a second.

1,200 people have been convicted of assaulting the Capitol? No. Actually, it was trespassing. It was trespassing. So let's just keep that in mind. What they were actually charged with was trespassing.

Now, let's go to the second half of that.

VOICE: Collectively to date, they have been sentenced to more than 840 years in prison.

STU: Yay!

GLENN: That sounds like a democracy. Doesn't it? Yeah. Yeah. More prison time. More prison time.

VOICE: Instead of calling these criminals. He called these insurrectionists patriots.

GLENN: Okay. Stop. Stop.

No. In no court documents. In no court case, are they being convicted or tried for insurrection.

None of them.

None of them have been charged and convicted of insurrection.

So where are we getting all this insurrection stuff?

Where is that happening? If that's what they did, then fine. Charge them with that. And I think you could make a case for a few of the people that I saw. You can make that case. But for the video specialist majority of them. Parading shouldn't get you a couple of years in prison.

Trespassing. Then you have the attorney general, going out.

Or the US attorney, who is in charge of this case. Going out and basically saying, we are going to charge the people who are even outside of the Capitol.

Cut ten.

VOICE: An important note when it comes to our prosecutions, when it comes to those who remained outside of the building. We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who entered the building. Or those who engaged in violent or corrupt conduct on Capitol grounds.

But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization, they have already committed a federal crime.

Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be present in, in the first place.

GLENN: Okay. So that's the fence that is outside of the Capitol. That was taken town by somebody who was clearly an operative of something. So when you went past that fence. Which was now laying in the dirt, and you couldn't see. And it seemed like it was okay to go by, you were committing trespassing.

You were outside. You weren't doing anything. But you were standing there. And so they will go after.

They're actually going after more people, as the -- as the polling on this, gets worse and worse and worse.

And as the evidence gets worse and worse and worse. For the prosecution.

When you start to see the tapes.

I don't know. Did you see what Lara Logan did on her show? Did you see this? Really, really credible work from Lara Logan on this. Did you see it, Pat, or, Stu

STU: I did not see anything from Lara Logan, no.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. Lara is talking to -- she just released it Saturday. She's talking to this woman I've never heard of.

And she was beaten and clubbed. Billy clubbed by three cops. Police officers. From the Capitol Police.

In a hallway, of the Capitol.

And she's not doing anything.

She's trapped in the crowd.

And these thee police officers target her and beat her in the head.

One of the police officers takes a closed fist, and hits her repeatedly five times in the head.

Then she's thrown head first, into a stonewall. She doesn't even remember any of this, because the beating was so bad. Then they start beating her with billy clubs.

And stabbing her with billy clubs. She's not doing anything. It's a horror show. An absolute horror show.

STU: The whole thing is misleading too. Which is amazing. The two things they wanted to get done after the January 6 situation, was one call on January 6th. So there would be this anniversary every year. So they could come out and have these speeches. And have a September 11th annual event. Where they can talk about the tragedy that was going on. And secondarily, they wanted to use the word insurrection.

We talked about this. Immediately knowing, that they would use it to take Donald Trump off the ballot. And try to make him --

GLENN: Right. So very well planned and pushed.

It's like when people during COVID, immediately, all of them started saying, you know, it's like we needed a great reset.

Like, where did that come from? All of a sudden, everybody is calling for a Great Reset and a new normal? That's weird.

Where did that come from?

Same thing happened with insurrection. And that insurrection word is crucial to the Constitution. Crucial.

STU: It's why they're taking them off these ballots in these states.

And, Glenn, you mentioned, like, what does he say?

1200 people have been charged and arrested.

GLENN: Yes. Right.

STU: Because of insurrection and all this.

It's like, the actual stats are comical. Even when it comes to this.

They are have been 1240 people arrested. Now, there's 350 cases are still pending.

So we don't know how it will turn out.

GLENN: Jeez. Four years into it!

STU: Yeah.

They have convicted, Glenn, 170 people of the 1240.

Two people have been acquitted, and the rest have pleaded guilty. Now, okay. So you have 710 people who have pleaded guilty.

Among those, only 210 have pleaded guilty to felony offenses.

So you have people -- about 450 of them.

Were sentenced to periods of incarceration. Ranging from a handful of days to more than 20 years. So when you look at it, more specifically here. You have, you know, as you pointed out, there are some people in this crowd, that were not really just in the crowd. Right?

They really did have ill intent. And there is some evidence that some of them did some really bad things. Generally speaking, a lot of these people are in the area. Maybe broke a rule. Broke a law. And maybe deserve a slap on the wrist to some of them. Generally speaking, you're talking about minor offenses, that they pleaded guilty to, without even a trial. And then also, went to a place where they're not even going to prison. These are such minor offenses, that they might be a fine or probation. Look, that doesn't mean it's nothing. I'm not saying it is.

We're not trying to downplay what happened on the day. But this idea that there was 1200 people that tried to overturn the government is so completely insane and overblown. That you lose all context of what actually happened on January 6th.

GLENN: Correct. Correct.

Examine let me just point out that who can't understand ma should be in jail for maybe a couple of years.

But Ray Epps. Let me give him a slap on the wrist.

Did we ever talk about that? When he was actually sentenced and got six months? Three months?

Something ridiculous.

Ray Epps has -- they have him on video, doing all the things they accused others of doing. And then some. And people were like, what happened there?

That's clear what happened there. This is a guy who got to pay some time.

He's got to. They tried to brush him off, make him disappear. And it wouldn't go away. So we will try it. And we will give a gentle slap on the wrist. So you stop that narrative. And you protect him from another administration coming in and going, oh, we're still working on this.

Why don't we really look into Mr. Epps, and see what happened there.

This is a way to get him for double jeopardy. He can't be tried a second time, for what he did. So he only got six months.

This is -- it's sick. When we come back. I want to play the audio of -- of Joe Biden

Very -- very angry. In -- and it's a little terrifying. Quite honestly.

So here's the really great part in Joe Biden's speech where he gets, I don't know. Some might say, that it's a little angry.

GLENN: Nineteen.

BIDEN: We have to make our choice. I don't mind. And I believe I know Americans will defend the truth. Not give into the big lie.

Will embrace the Constitution and the declaration. Not abandon it. To honor the sacred cause of democracy. Not walk away from it.

GLENN: Jeez. Now, that wasn't the clip. Do we not have the clip, where he just looks -- I mean, he looks insane.

STU: Do you find his -- do you find the ups and downs of emotions when he's speaking to be real?

GLENN: Yes, I do.

STU: You do?

GLENN: You don't?

STU: I'm not sure. I feel a little torn on it. I feel at times, he's forcing it, because he's trying to be some sort of -- he's trying to capture the energy -- and -- and -- I don't know.

GLENN: Maybe. Maybe.

STU: He's trying to show emotion in that moment.

GLENN: I find it -- the clip I saw this weekend. Where he was just squinting and angry.

Was terrifying. Because I felt he -- maybe he is just acting. But it was unhinged.

Absolutely unhinged.

And I don't know. That's what happens to people, with, you know, senility. They have wild mood swings. And get very, very angry.

And didn't like it. Didn't like it. Didn't like it at all.

Now, here he is, after the speech. He leaves the stage. Cut 20, please.

GLENN: Okay. All right. She -- Jill comes out and grabs his hand, because he's staring like a deer in headlights.

And she grabs his hand, and walks around the corner. She's just escorting him out.

As soon as they get around the corner, she drops his hand. But he dawdles off like he's a toddler.

STU: Is it possible he was walking away from the Coldplay song? Is that a possibility?

GLENN: No. That's a very good possibility.

Cut 21. Here he is at the helicopter.

He's looking at the helicopter. He's looking around like, where -- what do I -- are my toys. Am I going to -- am I going to -- is anybody in the helicopter?

I don't know. He's walking back now. Okay. Do you know where I'm supposed to go?

And then he -- he's walking around. And the officer is like, what? What are you looking for, sir? I was wondering if I left my shoe. Did I leave my shoe in the car? I don't know where -- pizza. Pizza. The secret word is pizza.

STU: I -- I for one, am stunned that they didn't tell them that the Secretary of Defense is in the hospital. I am shocked.

GLENN: Oh, yeah. Yeah.

I would be shocked if they told them. Because it would lead me to believe that he was actually running the country. The question is, did Barack Obama. Did they notify Barack Obama?

As long as they notified Barack Obama, then we're fine. We're fine. You know, it's not out of control.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.