RADIO

The most DANGEROUS AI story Glenn has ever heard

Filmmaker Robby Starbuck is suing Meta after its AI platform lied about him committing a crime and insisted that authorities should take his kids away from him – all because he’s fighting against DEI policies. Robby joins Glenn to explain what happened, and it makes Glenn declare this as possibly the most dangerous AI story he has ever heard. “What Meta has done to Robby Starbuck NEEDS to be corrected,” Glenn says, “or they will do it to EVERYONE.”


Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You're going to hear a wild, wild true story, from Robbie Starbuck. When I heard this a few weeks back, I was outraged. Outraged. And I immediately wrote to Robbie and said, whatever you need, I will stand with you on this. Because I don't care, you know, Robbie and I happen to agree on a lot of stuff. And I consider him a friend. But I don't care if he wasn't a friend, or we didn't agree.

What Meta has done to Robbie, needs to be corrected. Or they will do it to everyone.

I will bring Robbie Starbuck in, so he can tell the story.

Hello, Robbie, how are you?

ROBBIE: I'm doing well, thanks, Glenn. I appreciate it.

GLENN: Yeah. Thank you for coming on. And tell the story.

Explain -- explain what has happened to you, because of meta,and their AI.

ROBBIE: Yeah. So for those who are unfamiliar, basically for the last year, my mission, along with my team, has been eliminating the policies at major corporations. And we've done that. With most of the biggest companies on earth.

And with great success.

So at the time, in August of 2024, we were focused on Harley-Davidson. And eventually changed their policies.

But there was one particular Harley-Davidson dealership that was not happy about it. And they were from Bernie Sander's state of Vermont. And they had posted online a screen shot of Meta AI, and it said that I had been at January 6th.
And was, you know, part of the -- you know, events of that day.

And that I had committed a crime.

GLENN: And charged. And charged with a crime.

ROBBIE: Well, we found out about that part later, and we go and we ask Meta AI, because I initially thought, there's no way, one of the biggest companies on earth is inventing a crime that I committed. Right?

And so we go and check it. And lo and behold. Not only, it says that I committed a crime. It says, I was charged and arrested. And it later said, I pled guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct over January 6th. And the weird part, I wasn't in between DC that day.

This was totally invented out of nowhere.

GLENN: Wow.

ROBBIE: And we found out something later, that actually makes it even more concerning. This does not appear to be a hallucination.

GLENN: Yes.

ROBBIE: In the best estimation of myself and the team. And AI experts we've spoken to.

When Meta releases AI models, they release a version it can download and, you know, disconnect from the internet. And it will continue to work. Because it's like their train model. They call 3.0, 3.1, 2, 3.

And so on, and so forth. When you do that, and you try to create the situation, it consistently comes up with the same lies about me. And they range from the January 6 stuff to in general saying that I'm essentially a dangerous person. And actually, had told advertisers not to advertise with my show. Said, don't work with him.

GLENN: What!

ROBBIE: He's officially a dangerous individual. And it even insisted an authority should consider taking my kids from me.

And then --

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

Hold on just a second.

I want the audience to understand. First of all, there's no way, this is a hallucination.

There's no way.

So Meta AI is -- has suggested to authorities that they take Robbie's children away from him because he's so dangerous.

ROBBIE: Yeah, you're going to love this part. Not only they said that, it said that my kids would probably be better off in the care of somebody who is more accepting of transgenderism and DEI. And so, you know, if you think about this, it makes you feel even more targeted, right?

The fact that it's going into that narrative, tells you that, you know, it's very difficult to think this could be a hallucination. It's very, very specific. Consistent with sort of left-wing ideology, right? And so you have to go back to the training. And say, you know, how did it get trained to believe this? And go further with that.

We're very close to a future where people are going to have robotics in their homes. They're trained on AI.

Thousands and thousands of apps have always been trained on meta's AI. And so that's going to last a very wrong time. Right?

The other interesting thing about AI definition is that if you say something that is totally untrue about me, Glenn. And I sue you.

And that goes to court, and they say, Glenn, Robbie -- you know, there is an end point to that, right?

You know, you get justice for it, and so on and so forth.

With Meta's AI though, there is this sort of weird thing that happens, where we can go to court. And the court will say, oh, yeah. They defamed Robbie.

And at the end of that, you still have all these unplugged models in the wild. That they can download it by millions of people.

And you will never put the genie back in that bottle. Because they can't update versions that are disconnected from the internet.

Right? So when you think about the future. You can have robots that are walking around in law enforcement. Thinking that I'm a criminal or wanted individual.

Because there was a hallucination at one point that claimed I was wanted for kidnapping charges. The whole thing is insane. The whole thing is insane, Glenn. So we sued them. Because I think that's the reasonable thing to do. To try to get justice here. Not just for me. But everybody.

This can happen to anybody.

If it can happen to me, it can happen anybody.

If you think about everything from custody cases. To our future elections.

You know, this could rig elections.

GLENN: You know, let me just throw one more thing in.

And then I want to ask you some questions. Meta's AI also claimed that he had appeared on Nick Fuentes' Show. That had spoken at Nick's rallies, and then he supported him. He was engaged in Holocaust denial. He's never denied the Holocaust. He doesn't know Nick Fuentes and wouldn't be showing up at any of his rallies.

This is hard to believe that this is a hallucination. Because I -- I mean, I'm working with AI right now and AI designers. And what a hallucination is, it can't remember. It can't memorize the entire internet. Okay?

It can't memorize all of human history and information. So it's very good at remembering the beginning and the end. And sometimes, it will fill in the middle. But if you ask it, show me the sources on this! It -- it will usually correct itself.

You know, you have to say, that's not an actual source.

And it will usually correct itself. And it doesn't hallucinate the same thing on the same person, all the time.

So for this to continue to get deeper and deeper and deeper with you. And make things up that are worse and worse, shows that there is something in the algorithm, at least this is my feeling. And I could -- I've got an AI expert upstairs in the break. I'll ask him.

But it shows there's something in the algorithm, that is -- is tipping the AI to, you're a bad guy. You're a criminal.

ROBBIE: I mean, that's how it looks to us. And, you know, you have to wonder, you know. When there's no rules.

What kind of effect can an engineer have if they're an activist.

And they decide, I hate this group of people. I want to make them look terrible.

You know, and I -- looked like what you had seen.

But in an election. A lot of people. Especially young people. Are increasingly asking.

What's the difference between this candidate and that candidate?

Trying to figure out who they align with.

And if AI is allowed to say about them.
Like, doing PR for them. And the other side is, we can literally invent crimes, and say, they're wanted for kidnapping or whatever.

You know, you can shift a couple of percentage points on any election on that basis.
And that's something that I think everyone should find unacceptable.

GLENN: So this is -- you want to talk about David versus Goliath? Have you filed suit against them?

And what -- what's the status of all of this?

ROBBIE: Yeah, we have filed suit in Delaware. That's where they're incorporated.

And, you know, I think every legal expert I've seen, out there, has said, dang. This is the best defamation case I've ever seen.

I mean, it's so egregious.

Then Meta came out. We notified them in August 2024 of what was happening.

They didn't do anything about it, to actually fix the problem, until nine months later, when I came out with a video, where millions of people watched it. And it became a press story.

It was all over the media. Then they finally step up and try to do some things, right?

Then, it was just -- you know, I think about a week. Or close to a week after that had already come out.

And put out a statement apologizing, which, again, is like unheard of in the middle of litigation. They putting out a statement essentially saying, yeah. We did it.

You still had to say things that were just total fabrications, total lies about me.

Societies very clear that Meta was struggling to control what they had built.

GLENN: This is terrifying, Robbie. I mean, I talked to a few senators about your case, and they are just as incensed about it as I am. And I'm expecting Meta to be called up on Capitol Hill, regarding this.

But I don't know.

I mean, you know, what -- what -- AI has so much power now on Capitol Hill.

These gigantic companies.

And I'm not sure what anybody is really going to do.

I hope justice actually works for you.

And the system works for you. Because if not, this is the beginning of AI tyranny.

This is -- I mean, if this is allowed to go on. This is the beginning of it.

And it will in four years from now, forget about -- forget about your -- really, your freedom.

Your reputation. Everything will be gone.

If you happen to oppose what the AI program says is the right way to go.

ROBBIE: Yeah. We need serious change in the system.

You know, I think, I'm with you on this.

You know, I pray that the system works, as it's intended to work.

You increasingly, you know, have to wonder, as you watched sort of the rogue judges try to take on the powers of the executive branch.

Just how many holes there are in the justice system.

And how much it is working, as intended.

But I really do pray that it will.

Because I do think there's downstream effects of this.

The people are not seeing very clearly.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

ROBBIE: And I've gone down that dystopian rabbit hole, and I've looked at what would mean in 20 years if this is allowed to happen. It's very dangerous.

GLENN: Twenty? Five! It will be five years. It won't be 20 years.

ROBBIE: Yeah.

GLENN: Robbie, how can I help? And how can the audience help you?

ROBBIE: Well, you know, I will say, we just have to consistently keep this story out there.

I think that's really important, that everybody knows what is happening and what is possible.

Because this extends public figures. Like, if you have a custody dispute. And they're deciding reputation scoring on AI.

You can invent all kinds of things. You can lose your kids over this. If you're going and trying to get insurance, you could be denied insurance over being perceived as a reputational risk, because you have the wrong politics, right?

I mean, this is very dangerous. Talk to your lawmakers. Write to them.

Ask them to establish ethical boundaries for AI. Because there has to be some boundaries. There is -- don't get me wrong.

A lot of incredible things AI can be used to. But if you have no boundaries, it's going to be very, very dangerous. And so that would be the first thing.

You know, at this point, I'm handling the legal costs and everything.

It's clear, that things could get so expensive legally. Depending on the strategy, maybe at that point, we go through another round of saying, hey, can people jump in and help?

But, you know, I think we can take this all the way. And I really do believe it's important that we get serious and sincere changes in the marketplace.

GLENN: Count on me, as a serious ally. I don't think I've ever made this offer to anybody. But I want you to give me regular updates. And come on the -- come on the program.

Whenever you have an update. You just call. I'll put you on the air. And you give us an update. Because we will follow this story.

And it's important. I mean, this is -- this is the beginning of the end. Anything you might be afraid of, with AI. If this isn't corrected, it will happen. And it will happen quickly.

So it's got to be corrected.

Robbie, thank you so much.

ROBBIE: Thank you, Glenn. I appreciate it.

GLENN: You bet. Buh-bye.

RADIO

Dennis Prager's Prophetic Take on Covid Lockdowns from 2020 | FLASHBACK CLIP

This flashback conversation between Glenn Beck and Dennis Prager from 2020 captures the exact cultural turning point that America now recognizes in hindsight... the moment when social media reshaped identity, Hollywood crossed moral lines, lockdowns fueled fear and confusion, and honest voices were punished instead of heard. Looking back with clarity in 2025, the question becomes: How much of today’s chaos began in 2020, and why didn’t we listen at the time?

Watch the FULL Interview HERE

RADIO

Glenn Beck Warns: AI Revolution Will Reshape Civilization

Artificial intelligence is accelerating faster than anyone imagined, and Glenn Beck warns we’re entering a 12-18 month window that will permanently reshape civilization. From AI agents capable of blackmail, lying, and manipulating data, to emerging AGI systems that hide their intentions to stay “alive,” the danger is no longer theoretical. Glenn and Stu Burguiere break down why Big Tech will fight against limits on "AI-Personhood," how self-driving cars, Neuralink, and autonomous agents will soon control every part of daily life, and why America urgently needs a constitutional amendment to prevent AI from gaining civil rights. The question now isn’t whether AI will reshape society... it’s whether humans can stop it from becoming our replacement.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

How Your Food is ENGINEERED to Be Addictive as it Makes America Sick

America’s food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, and insurance systems have fused into a single profit-driven machine that engineers addiction, manipulates policy, and prioritizes corporate gain over public health. Jillian Michaels exposes how Big Agriculture, Big Food, and Big Pharma have captured once-well-intentioned laws, weaponized food science, and engineered ultra-processed products designed to hook consumers and keep them sick. From “bliss point” chemistry to chemicals hidden behind innocent labels, this eye-opening conversation uncovers how the health of an entire nation was sacrificed for profit and why the system is now too coordinated to ignore.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with Jillian Michaels HERE

RADIO

AI bots are experiencing BRAIN ROT... and it’s happening to all of us

Are we destroying our minds with endless scrolling? Glenn reveals some shocking new evidence that Large Language Models (AI) trained on the same viral, low-quality internet junk we consume every day are experiencing rapid cognitive collapse — reasoning plummets, long-term memory vanishes, and even dark, narcissistic traits emerge. Worst of all? Even when scientists try to “detox” the AI with high-quality data, the damage is permanent. If we don’t choose to feed our minds better content — real books, deep conversation, silence, and reflection — we risk becoming a society that can’t think deeply, care deeply, or live freely… and we might be too far gone to even notice.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: The average person spends two hours and 21 minutes a day, on social media.

That's the average person! Two hours 21 minutes a day on social media.

Approximately 141 minutes every single day, scrolling.

The average American!

Our on screen time, overall, the average American spends six hours 38 minutes, every day, on screens, connected to the internet!

Oh, my gosh. Wow! Time just gone! Just vanished into -- into, what? Updates? Scrolls? What is it that we're reading?

Seriously, are we -- we exercising our soul with deep thought? Do you know that leash reading in the US has fallen?

Only 16 percent of Americans age 15-plus read for their own enjoyment on an average day? Fifteen [sic]. That number was almost 30 percent in 2003. Fewer books: US adults in 2021 said they read on average 12.6 books a year, down from 15 in 2002 to 2016.

So we're losing reading skills. We're losing deeper thought. We're losing hours of conversation. We're losing how many hours of reflection? At least minutes, maybe 100 minutes.

Our attention spans. How long can you focus on something?

You know, the second screen was different. When we first started TheBlaze, I talked about doing a second screen. Technology, and it wasn't because you couldn't watch something. They're now talking about taking your TV show or your -- your Netflix show, and dumbing it down so much because people are watching or they're scrolling while they're watching the TV. And so they can't follow a complex story line. Oh, my gosh!

We are just going to be stupid slugs. Everything that we're doing online is fracturing attention, memory, and sustained reasoning. And so at what point does this become an epidemic? At what point our are our minds starving for any kind of nutrition as we feed them calories of noise? Now let me tell you the real story. AI is holding a mirror up for us.

There's a new study that came out. LLMs can get brain rot. Okay? That caught my eye. Large language models, LLMs. They are trained on junk web content. So viral, shallow, high engagement stuff.

And all it does is it's just cataloging all this stuff and just consuming all of this stuff that we're scrolling through every day, okay? Do you know what's happening to the LLM?

It's experiencing cognitive decline. It can't -- its reasoning ability is dropping. Falling through the floor. Long context memory, gone!

And dark personality traits, psychopathic tendencies and narcissism has increased. This is within AI. Okay? And when the junk content ratio rose from zero to 100 percent, if you're just scrolling for junk, the reasoning benchmark falls from 75 percent to almost 55 percent.

Its ability to understand long -- you know, long form context, falls from 85 percent, to about 50 percent.

Now, here's the scariest part, they caught this and they're like, holy cow.

Look at what's happening to the large language model. It's completely decaying.

You know, we're just doing it for a year now, and look what's happened. It's not reasoning anymore. It's turning dark. It can't understand long form content anymore.

Let's get it off that!

Let's start putting good, clean stuff into it.

Even after retraining on clean high-quality data, the models never recover the baseline capacity.

Okay?

The rot remains!

As a man or now as a machine thinketh, so he becomes.

I just -- I've been blown away by this study, for the last few weeks. It came out a couple of weeks ago. I had it on my desk, and I wanted to tell you about it. And I just haven't had time.

And I just keep thinking. This is a machine. This is not our brain. This is -- this is a machine that is -- is using the same kind of crap.

I mean, what happens if you don't monitor what you think?

Or worse what?

When we stop thinking?

AI is teaching us a lesson. And I guarantee. This study has been out for weeks!

Never heard it, did you? Nobody is talking about it. It's screaming at us, "Hey, learn a lesson!"

When you feed nothing but lone nutrient attention-hooking, high engagement junk, the capacity to reason, to remember, and to care degrades.

Aren't we seeing this now? Do people care as much as they used to?

Nope! Can they reason?

Nope!

Can they remember what happened yesterday?

Nope. My gosh, don't worry about AI taking over, controlling us. Programming our lives. Look at ourselves. We've already -- we've already signed over our lives to an algorithm.

We're studying AI brain rot!

But is anybody studying, you know, brain, brain rot?

Maybe -- maybe we do recognize it. Maybe we do recognize it. But, you know, we're too apathetic to wean ourselves off the digital era.

It's hard. It is hard. But when the nature of what we ingest for body and mind becomes shallow, the body suffers. But mind sinks deeper.

And we live in an age where we might be less full of nourishment, but full of distraction.

We talk less. We actually listen less. We read fewer books.

You know, where our minds just flit instead of dive. Our attention span, it's almost gone. And make no mistake, this is not just a matter of convenience or lifestyle. This is creeping into the structure of who we are, individually, and collectively.

What is this going to do to -- to our children?

I mean, even if we stopped right now, and we wanted to change, we -- according to the brain rot study.

We won't get that baseline back. Do we pass this stuff on?

Is it getting to a point, to where we're just pumping out morons.

I mean, we're already doing that. I mean, really pumping out morons.

At what point is this an epidemic, where anybody even recognizes it?

When -- when is it where our ability to think critically is so diminished, we cannot be a free people?

Are we there yet?

I told you earlier, I went to the bookstore yesterday. My son and I went to the bookstore.

And I was like, we're getting books!

Because I haven't read. I've been reading online.

It's not the same. It's just not the same.

You've got -- you can't remember. Because you remember sometimes with your fingers. You remember where it is in the book. You know, I can never find anything digitally. I can never find where it is in the pook. I'm -- I'm looking for it.

I can't find it. But I know right where those facts are, if I'm reading a physical copy of a book. And, you know, deep reading. Quiet reflection. Sustained dialogue. Pretty rare! Pretty rare! Our mental health, our social health!

You know, kind of going down. You know, civic health. I wrote it. A little bit. I think we all agree with that.

Even when artificial intelligence trained on junk content degrade in reason, we still feed ourselves the same thing.

Are we going to keep doing that? Or are we going to choose to do something different?

Well, first thing, we have to get people to understand it.

Can we really?

Can we get people to actually listen to this?

And then engage again, in thoughtful reading and conversation. And meaningful silence.

It starts with awareness.

And then choice. What do you permit -- what are you going to put into your body?

What do you permit into your mind?

Otherwise, one day, we'll all look around. And we will realize.

We didn't just lose time. We lost the capacity to deeply think. Deeply connect.

Deeply live.

And then maybe again, maybe we're so stupid and shallow, we won't know.

I'm happy. Are you happy?

What was the question?

What are you saying?

Maybe that's -- maybe that's -- maybe that's a better life!

I love my family!

I don't know who my family is, but I love them! Politics. I don't vote. I haven't voted for a long time. Look at -- (laughter) TikTok! TikTok! TikTok! Okay?

It's up to us, America.