RADIOFebruary 13, 2023

Democrats’ RADICAL white supremacy bill could end HORRIBLY

In further efforts to curb speech, Democrat Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee recently introduced a new bill (the ‘Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023’) that is one of the ‘most unconstitutional and radical pieces of legislation proposed in I don’t know how many years,’ Glenn says. In this clip, Glenn explains the bill, which aims to prevent and prosecute acts of white supremacy (without really defining what ‘white supremacy’ actually is). Then, Glenn shows how this bill relates to similar moves throughout history that ultimately have NOT ended well…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let's -- let's start here, shall we? College kids now are learning to snitch on each other, through secret tip lines.

This is Germany, West -- I'm sorry. East Germany, under the Soviets. They had the Stasi.

And they would -- they -- they got people to snitch on each other.

That is the one thing that people have always said about America. They'll come over, and they'll say, Americans are so nice.

And they're so trusting. Well, it's not that we were that trusting. It's that Europe wasn't trusting. Nobody trusted each other.

Because for centuries, they've turned each other in, for one reason or another. So keep it to yourself. Keep it to your family. What do they say is if we're open. Because we've never had that kind of thing. So when George Bush first promoted, hey, you see something, say something. Call the White House snitch line if you see something that your neighbor is doing.

No. I mean, if I see my neighbor, and he's, you know, obviously something is wrong.

I'll call the local police.

Hey, can you just check this out?

But I'm not watching my neighbor, and snitching on my neighbor.

And that's what's happening right now. People are -- in college. This door room number, and this dorm room. Had a sign that said all solicitors must be able to define the word woman, and then the campus PC police come. Seventy-nine complaints at the University of Connecticut. There's a bathroom that is being identified based on gender.

Oh, my gosh. No.

Oh. There was some verbal remarks, directed at certain race. And gender identity at this comedian, that was on campus.

Really?

In Illinois, a student was reported for saying that there were only two genders, and reportingly not wanting to live with a roommate, who just makes stuff up in his head. That's no longer acceptable.

Meanwhile, to further curb speech, Sheila Jackson Lee, has introduced the leading against white supremacy act of 2023.

It is one of the most unconstitutional and radical pieces of legislation, proposed in -- I don't know how many years.

The leading against white supremacy act, it aims to prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime, and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime. Blah, blah, blah.

So if you engage in what is described as white supremacy hate, and you inspire a hate crime, well, if it was used in the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of any of the crime, you're responsible.

And you go to prison. But they don't define exactly what white supremacy is. And white supremacy crimes are.

Okay?

Now, seems like a problem. You know, maybe.

Especially when you say, there is no definition in the law of white supremacy ideology.

And then, you know, the conspiracy provision. It's -- it makes it illegal to publish material, that inspires a crime.

So if I publish something and somebody read it, some lunatic, and they were like, oh, my gosh. I've got to take this into my own hands. I'm going to go shoot down that Chinese weather balloon myself. This government would probably say, that was a crime.

And if they were white, and they're like, yeah. And white power!

I could be prosecuted. You could be prosecuted. It doesn't matter if they're mentally ill or not. This is kind of a -- a problem. Kind of a problem, for millions of Americans.

Now, this is all happened before. All of this has happened before. There is nothing new under the sun. The question is: Are we going to learn from history and recognize the -- the problems and recognize the -- did -- what did -- historically, what did people do? Did it work, or did it not work? Did they do something or not do something?

You can't just expect utopia to happen. Because utopia. You know what utopia -- is -- I mean, in a better world, it would be a coloring book. And it would be at best, fiction. The word utopia actually comes from the 16th century. And it was kind of a joke.

Utopia, it came -- you know, it was written by Thomas Moore. And he took the Greek prefix for not or no, and the suffix for place. No place.

That's what -- that's what utopia means. No place, or nowhere. Get it?

So I think the book by Thomas Moore is a prediction of communism. It takes place on a fictional island called Utopia. It's an island of slavery, where poverty is cured by harmony. Crime is solved by equity. Private property, money, been abolished. Social classes have been unmasked, for what they really are.

Conspiracy of the rich.

And utopia, the island nowhere, achieved a complete equality of goods.

Now, equality of goods. What they did was they just destroyed the meaning of all goods.

Because everyone shares in a utopia. And to devalue currency, precious objects are treated like trash.

People give diamonds to children, instead of marbles. They have chamber pots or toilets, made of gold. And even the chains on the slaves are made of gold, and traditional institutions mean nothing.
Euthanasia is common on the island of Utopia.

Because nobody really cares about the value of anything, including human life.

Utopians always claim to be humanist. I just want to do what's best for all humans. And they offer that utopian view. And, again, it is the basis of Marxism and communism. And really, it's just all a lie.

But it's a diversion. It's a delay tactic. Because people don't realize, this is a lie, until usually it's too late.

Because it's a slow boil.

Think of how -- you are accepting things now, that you wouldn't have accepted, 15 years ago. Ten years ago.

Ten years ago, if I said, men could have babies too. Every liberal would have said, not possible.

What are you talking about?

Well, that's what you're going to tell me in about ten years. No, I'm not. That's ridiculous.

You are not parroting and saying things that you know are nonsense.

I'm speaking to America in general.

And people are saying, right now, give me the power, so I can make you powerful.

Yeah. And the choice is always, it's going to be Armageddon.

It's going to be -- he's worse than Hitler.

NASA -- he's worse than Trump. And Trump was worse than Hitler. Oh, wow. And what was Mitt Romney again?

I mean, it's always a choice between utopia, we can't really define it. But we'll know it when we get there.

And we can't tell you how we'll pay for it. But it will all be sugar plumb fairies and lollipops.

It's wonderful.

Or. Go ahead. You can roast in the fires of hell, with Satan and Armageddon. Go ahead.

And they convince us, that the power of a nation should not belong to you. Everything belongs to you.

Everything in your life, all of your thoughts, your actions, they belong to you.

The things you have earned through merit, belong to you. And if you've, quote, earned something without merit, if you've just inherited it, you don't really own it.

You really -- something becomes yours, when you've earned it. But all that goes out the window. The power of a nation doesn't belong to people. It's stuff.

It should all belong to the state. So people, one by one, historically speaking, hand all of their power over to the state.

And then the state decides what people should be. What they can say. What they can watch. What they can listen to.

They define hate. You and I both know hate. We know hate when we see hate. We know love when we see love.

I can tell you the difference between love and sex. There's a big difference.

Love always wins. Sex doesn't always win. Utopians take the state, and turn it into the brain of society.

And it controls everything.

Now, think of this. This is from the 1600s. Think of this.

The state becomes the brain of society. With AI and all of the technology we have today, they are literally trying to be the brain of society.

And control everything and hold all of the power. It will do the thinking and deciding for everyone.

In America, the first utopian, was Woodrow Wilson, really.

The one with real power, he used centralization, and bureaucracy, to make a collectivism that Americans had never seen before.

And then he spread it in all the universities. He convinced Congress, to give, hand them their power, so he could use war and surveillance to make a war safe for democracy. FDR took the step even further.

He said, it would get rid of war altogether, with a little help from Josef Stalin.

I -- we've seen all of these things before, and America turned. Just in time.

Will we this time?

Because there's -- there's one more example, that we should learn from. And it is from China.

But remember, China is the new model, according to all the global leaders. All of the big capitalist leaders.

And all the leaders of the -- the world, including Joe Biden.

China is the new model. Well, let me tell you how they got there.

In a minute. Sponsored by preborn. You know, every once in a while, I get to give you good news. And here's some good news. You know how many babies you have saved?

How many babies have been born, just because of this audience?

It's over, I think 55- or 60,000 babies, in the last 12 months, were saved because of you.

Because somebody, if it wasn't you, somebody, you know, maybe in the car next to you, or the cubicle next to you, somebody was listening to this program. They were like, I'm going to donate 28 bucks. That bought an ultrasound for a woman who had come into a clinic, 55,000 of them, assuming there's no twins.

And they walk in, and they say, I think I'm going to have an abortion.

They saw the ultrasound, that cost 28 bucks. They didn't have to pay for it.

And that made mom go, I'm going to -- that's a baby. I'm going to keep my baby.

That's what you have done. And you can do it, for 28 bucks.

I think it's 140 bucks. And what do you get? Six.

I mean -- you really can save a bunch of baby's lives. Do it once a month, $28.

Be a hero. Dial #250, and say the key word baby.

That's #250.

Key word baby. Or go to preborn.com/Glenn. Find out all the information.

Preborn.com/Glenn.

Go there now. Ten-second station ID.
(music)

GLENN: All right. I want to talk to you about the great cultural revolution here.

Like every group utopian, Mao started with ideas. I got ideas.

Slogans, basically, that sound good. But don't really mean anything. See if any of these sound familiar to you.

Before long, the slogans are true.

This is how he made every aspect of life, political. That way, anyone who disagreed with him, was conspiring against China. The great utopia.

They weren't his opponents. They were the enemies of the people.

This is why utopians always combine academia with the military. The academics dream up the new utopias, and the military forces people into those utopias. And Mao is really clever about this.

He convinced people how they had a role in how things work. Your lives are political for a reason.

This is how he got students to snitch on one another. Then get kids to betray their own parents, all in the names of the state.

This is how you create a whole society of vigilantes. For Woodrow Wilson, he had the four-minutemen.

That was his good news. For Mao. The red guards. Young activists, who served as his unofficial enforcers. In colleges, I just told you what the snitchers were. And they think they are doing good, just like these others did. The tech world, isn't that really the enforcer of the government now?

One of the first utopians. One of the first utopians of the modern age, really was Mao.

He was the most prolific at death. They take power to destroy history. That's the first thing.

They say the world as we know it, China as we know it, has to be replanned. Reset.

Because everything you know is old, dusty, and no longer any good.

At the start of the cultural revolution, the red guard led a campaign to eradicate the four Olds.

I want you to listen. Pesky. Four Olds.

The four Olds. That they had to get rid of.

The old customs.

Christmas means nothing, Thanksgiving is a celebration of slavery, Fourth of July is a celebration. Get rid of the old customs.

The -- the old culture.

You needed new habits, and new ideas.

The old history, had to be swept away.

The old guard had to be swept away.

They started, believe it or not, by tearing down statues, and changing the names of streets.

Then they attacked anyone who tried to stop them. They destroyed people's homes. They publicly humiliated their opponents. And no one could stop them. Because people had already given Mao all their power.

Before long, the Red Guard was destroying cemeteries and factories and libraries and museums and temples. Wow, they were burning down their own cities. What happens is, the same story over and over again. They want to reform the big institutions of society.

But in the end, they only destroy the small institutions. Family, church, private property.

And they always start with the idea, that you have a duty to the state. And the group is more important than the individual. And if that individual is speaking out, they have to be shut down.

That was only the first installment of Mao's genocidal reign.

Did the U.S. Government TELEPORT Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?!

A decade ago, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared without a trace. Now, some are claiming this was a cover-up — by the U.S. GOVERNMENT! Glenn speaks with one of those people, investigative journalist Ashton Forbes, who claims that he has video evidence of what really happened. The alleged footage, which he claims was leaked from within the government, depicts a plane disappearing into what could be a worm hole created by three rotating orbs. Ashton lays out the science that he believes explains this … but does the government really have this game-changing technology? Glenn lets you decide …

Biden Sent HOW MANY Migrants to THIS Red State?!

According to a new report, internal DHS data has revealed how the Biden administration has flown hundreds of thousands of “inadmissible” migrants into U.S. cities — and the top 15 cities are eye-opening. The controversial CHNV mass-parole program has used YOUR tax dollars to send migrants who have claimed refugee status all over the country. But the administration has brought the most migrants into the country BY FAR through airports in (of course) the red state of Florida. This is ON TOP of the record-high illegal immigration that we have seen under the Biden administration. So, what’s the goal here?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: New internal DHS data reveals 45 US cities that hundreds of thousands of migrants that have felony into via the Biden administrations, controversial CHMV mass parole program.

It shows that the top 15 cities that migrants were flown into, on your tax dollar. On our airlines. Which you have to take your shoes off.

They have to know. I mean, come on over here.

Yeah. Every third person, we do a rectal exam.

Yeah. And now -- now we're just flying these people. Without knowing, who they really are. Doing it in the middle of the night.

Now, these aren't the people who go across the border.

Are these the ones who the United States government went out to, hey. Is anybody -- refugee. If you're a refugee, I've got free tickets to America.

So the top 15 cities, Miami, Florida, 91,000 people were flown in from January through August 2023.

Eight months. Eight months. Miami, Florida, Florida. 91,000.

Ft. Lauderdale. Which is the same city.

I mean, it's Miami Ft. Lauderdale.

STU: Yeah. I used to live in Ft. Lauderdale.

GLENN: It's part of Miami.

STU: It's a little bit of a drive to Miami. It's like Dallas/Fort Worth.

A couple cities close to each other.

GLENN: So Ft. Lauderdale got 60,000. And then New York City is number 3. They got 14,000. Wait a minute.

Wow! That's quite a spread there.

So, you know, they get 150,000, just in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale. And then 14,000 in New York. Houston --
STU: And think about what Eric Adams has said.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

STU: They're overrunning our communities, we can't do anything. Half the cities on this list are on one state. And New York City can't handle this.

GLENN: Yeah. They have 14,000. Then Houston has 8,000.

Orlando has 16,000. Another Florida.

Los Angeles, three. Tampa, another Florida. 3200. Dallas, Texas, is 2200.

San Francisco, 2,000. Atlanta, 2,000.

Newark, New Jersey.

I mean --

STU: Oh, people love Newark.

GLENN: Honestly, if you're like in some other place.

I don't care if they're torturing you. And they say, you want to come to the United States?

Sure. Where am I headed?

Newark, New Jersey. No, I'm going to hang out. I'm good. I'm good.

Put me back on the rack. It's false alarm. I'm not going anywhere.

STU: How are these decisions made?

GLENN: What do you mean?

STU: Do you know -- if you're someone coming in, you're an illegal immigrant, you're on this parole program.

And you come in. Do they say, hey. Here is your -- they have fliers come visit Orlando out there. Look through them until you pick one. Do they assign a city to you? Is it wherever your relatives are?

GLENN: I don't know. It's taken us forever, to get just this information.

STU: I know. It's true. It could be, that these people are like, look, I don't want to go to Newark. So I will pick Tampa or Orlando or Ft. Lauderdale.

My guess is, do you know anyone who lives there?

Yeah. My brother lives in Miami.

So they're flying them to Miami.

I don't know. Regardless, wouldn't the opposite be obvious, if you were honest here? If you're the Biden administration, you keep telling everyone that people in the south and the red states hate immigrants. They're racists. They're, you know, xenophobes. They don't have any programs for them.

So why would you continue to keep bringing them to Florida and Texas. Why?

Wouldn't you bring them to the cities, that have all these wonderful programs that you've passed. Why not?

GLENN: Well, unless you're trying to make sure that you fly them into a city, like Miami, Ft. Lauderdale. That's usually run by Democrats.

And you can have them vote.

STU: But -- but, again, it's not run currently by tells me.

GLENN: Miami, Ft. Lauderdale.

STU: Republican mayor. Remember, he ran for a short time, ran for president.

GLENN: I don't remember that. It was very short. Very short.

STU: Very short. But unless you have enemies, in red states and you realize that what you're doing is a punishment, right?

The same kind of thing that, you know, Greg Abbott did in Texas. You know what, we will send these people up to you guys. You guys deal with them.

Because we're being honest with them here. This is a strain on our society. And so we shouldn't be responsible for them. Because we want them to be stopped before they come in.

Right? All these other people are saying, we're welcoming. You're welcomed here. You will always be welcomed in New York City. I don't know if that one is expired. But that's what Eric Adams was saying when he was running for election.

GLENN: San Francisco.

STU: San Francisco. All these things. We went through and found all the quotes from these mayors.

All of them, welcomed with open arms, illegal who didn't notice. And invited them to come. And now when they actually show up, they realize what the situation is. You're taking a bunch of people who have no current path to earn enough to -- to house themselves. To feed themselves.

To give themselves basic humanitarian aid.

And then you're going to put that on the state, or local -- local communities.

GLENN: Imagine. Imagine your city. Knowing how large you are. You have an influx of 150,000 people.

Where are those jobs?

Where are the jobs for those people? You don't have a deficit of 150,000, you know, employees.

STU: Where do they work?

GLENN: Where are they working?

Where are they working?

By the way, a recent pew poll found that nearly two-thirds of Americans have little or no confidence that Joe Biden is physically fit to be president.

That's two-thirds. When you're talking about the immigration thing, 80 percent of America, wants them to be sent back home.

Okay?

They're starting to get really.

Quite, quite intense object the immigration thing.

And that's Republicans and Democrats.

Everybody knows that the economy is in flames.

Again, two-thirds have little or no confidence that Joe Biden is even physically fit to be president.

What the hell, how is this so close?

How is this so close?

I just -- it doesn't -- it doesn't make sense.

STU: People are not making judgments based on what's in front of them.

GLENN: No. They're not.

STU: They're these partisan. You know, these partisan lanes you get in. And it's impossible to escape them. I don't know. For 80 percent of people, at this point.

We would like to think it's some rare thing.

But it's pretty much everybody who looks at this. And doesn't seem to be spending any time to make this instigation.

Decision was made for them, years ago, decades ago, and they're going and checking the boxes.

Yes. He has mean tweets. But you had a job. We had a country. I mean, yeah. But I know those mean tweets are really, really horrible.

Biden FAILED to do THIS While Calling Out Violent College Protests

President Biden spoke quickly to the press about the pro-Palestine protests that have taken over college campuses. But while Biden covered the basics — how Americans have a right to protest, but not protest violently, how antisemitism is bad, and how the rule of law should be upheld — did he go far enough? Glenn and Stu don’t believe so. Biden had an opportunity to make a real impact, but instead, he said enough to save his own skin and satisfy some supporters…and he also threw in a few lines to pander to the violent mobs...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Can we pull one of these?

BIDEN: Must be upheld. We're not an authoritarian nation. Where we silence people and squash dissent. The American people are heard. In fact, peaceful protest is the best tradition of how Americans respond to conflict issues. But -- but neither are we a lawless country. We are a civil society, and order must prevail.

Throughout our history, we have often faced moments like this, because we are a big, diverse, free thinking and freedom-loving nation. In moments like this, there are always those who rush in to score political points. But this isn't a moment for politics. It's a moment for clarity. So let me be clear: Peaceful protests in America, violent protest is not protected. Peaceful protest is.

It's against the law, when violence occurs. Destroying property is not a peaceful protest. It's against the law. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and ground school. None of this is a peaceful protest.

Threatening people, intimidating people, instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It's against the law.

Dissent is essential to democracy. But dissent must never lead to disorder or to deny the rights of others so students can finish the semester and their college education.

Look, it's a basically a matter of fairness. It's a matter of what is right.

Does the right to protest, but not the right to cause chaos.

People have the right to get an education. The right to get a degree.

The right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked.

Let's be clear about this as well: There should be no place in any campus, no place in America, for anti-Semitism or threats of violence against Jewish students.

There is no place for hate speech, or violence of any kind. Whether it's anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab-Americans or Palestinian Americans. It's simply wrong. There's no place for racism in America. It's all wrong.

It's un-American.

I understand people have strong feelings and deep convictions, and in America, we respect the right and protect the right for them to express that. But it doesn't mean anything goes. It needs to be done without violence, without destruction. Without hate. And within the law.

You know, make no mistake, as president I will always defend free speech, I will always be just as a strong on standing up for freedom of the law. That's my responsibility to you, the American people. My obligation to the Constitution.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

BIDEN: Thank you very much.
GLENN: Okay. So there you go. You have Joe Biden doing --

STU: You want to take questions? He might be taking a question soon.

VOICE: Have the protests forced you to reconsider any of the policies with regards to the region?
BIDEN: No.

GLENN: And he walks away.

VOICE: Mr. President, do you think the National Guard should intervene?

BIDEN: No.

GLENN: He's walking away, and the door is closing behind him.

STU: But he's still answering them. No. No.

GLENN: He's just in a -- no. In the hallway. He's in his bedroom. No.

He looks at his wife, she says no. I know. What's happening.

STU: What did you make of that? It was pretty Milquetoast, boring. Not much.

We were talking about this off the air, that he had an actual opportunity here, if he wanted to win over a good chunk of the country, while risking his far left flank, of kind of having the clichéd Sister Souljah moment, who is really harsh against these people are doing what they're doing.

STU: He did not do that. It may have been what he was trying to do. He's seemingly incapable of giving a speech of any value.

That was a -- that was a -- just a -- hey.

GLENN: I think it's enough to satisfy many supporters. We're also at --

STU: What kind of supporters. Like, what group is he targeting that? Like a liberal, maybe Jewish voter?

GLENN: Yeah. And not really.

I think he's kind of pissed off the Jews when he's like, and no place for anti-Semitism.

Or people wanted to hurt Hamas. And Palestinians. And Muslims. And those who are in the Mickey Mouse Club.

STU: Right.

GLENN: The ones who have been raped by the Disney corporation. Which we're totally fine with.

You know, I -- I don't think he -- he reached out to -- to those supporters. But I think he did enough for maybe the average person who is a Democrat. And wants him tolerance the right thing.

What -- okay.

STU: He said, no violence.

He said protests are okay. But no violence. And such. And there's some group, he connects with that. There was a chance for him to really set this issue. Maybe make it a strength, and not a weakness. And he did not do that there. That was -- he could have made a moment of like, look.

These people on these campuses are -- basically, calling them revolting. Passion. Some sort of anger toward the people who are calling for the genocide of Jews. There's none of that. Well, to make sure people can get to classes. You know, everyone has a right to get a degree. Which, by the way, they don't have a right to.

But all of that being said, it wasn't the worst thing I've ever seen out of his mouth.

At least he didn't have red villain lighting behind him.

GLENN: Well, you know what is great though?

He doesn't need that anymore.

STU: We looked into his character.

It's funny too, he's -- from a dramatic standpoint, you couldn't put Joe Biden in like a dramatic movie. Because he's so bad at these speeches.

Even if he says something evil, you're just like, oh, God. This sucks.

GLENN: I think that we should bring the guillotine back. And we should take all bankers. And we should cut their heads off.

STU: Right. They're so -- there's no emotion.

You go back to the Star Wars, like, you know, this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause speech.

You need to be -- you can't put him in a movie. Everyone would be like, wait. What?

Is he talking about hamburgers? What is he talking?

GLENN: And the rebels are taking our bases, and we must stop for the empire!

STU: Right.

Yeah.

GLENN: And taking -- and we --

STU: Cough three times in the middle of a sentence.

GLENN: My uncle was in a spaceship once. He was flanked by aliens.

STU: And we -- isn't it just -- can we at least agree with this. Democrats, Republicans, everybody across the aisle. This is embarrassing. Can we at least just agree on that point. You can still say his policies are better or whatever. People around him. Making the policies, have a better idea, running the country.

Aren't you just embarrassed by this, day after day after take.

It is utterly depressing. That the country that has led the world out of the lack of Silicon Valleyization has this dolt running it.

It's so pathetic. In every way.

GLENN: So you are -- you're -- you're drawing a lot more out of this speech than I did.

I don't think it was bad. I don't think it was good.

But I don't think -- that's not going to make any impact. One way or another.

STU: I don't know that we disagree. I think he had an opportunity for impact, which he did not take. He could have made it worse. I don't think he did it that. I just think he's such an uninspiring figure. And I'm embarrassed when we're led by somebody like that. When I said led, it's definitely in air quotes there. I don't know the president should be viewed this way. But the way we view the president. He just sucks. It's maybe not even deeper than that.

He just sucks at that. He's not good at thing he does. The job he does, he's incapable of doing.

And that's a little bit frustrating for a world superpower.

GLENN: Yes. Again, now I think you're going too soft.

He doesn't -- he's not just incapable of doing it. The guy is a box of matches, in a fireworks factory.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And he's constantly striking himself.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: What happened?

What happened?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: He's constantly setting everything on firepower.

STU: Yeah. But I don't think -- that speech didn't strike me as, hey. Keep going protesters. It wasn't that.

GLENN: No. Which again, if he was some ideological maniac, maybe he would have gone that way.

Elizabeth Warren would have done that. Elizabeth wash would have been like, burn these things to the ground.

Probably. I think. He didn't quite do that.

He went out there, with the idea of, people are criticizing me for not saying anything.

I have to say something. I can say, hey, free speech is good. Don't break the law everybody.

But step back, and probably at this point, what is it? 10:00 a.m. dinner.

And then the day is over. That's what it felt like. And that's the way it feels like all the time with this guy, even when he's doing things that are viscerally angry about -- I mean, he's overcoming the entire system of government with things like the student loan plan. And he does it the same way.

He looks as boring and terrible and awful and coughing in the million dollars of sentences. That he does every other speech.

And, you know, watching him.

It's funny too.

Because he's obviously been told. Hey, if you can avoid coughing in the middle of a sentence.

Can you do that?

Multiple times, he went to cough.

He catches himself. And his hand stays a foot away from. He brings it up.

He starts to cough.

He realizes, he's not supposed to do it.

He doesn't have to cough. He's doing it as a tick. I don't know what he's doing -- and he also does this little scratch his face thing in the million dollars. Jews shouldn't be so murdered all the time.

GLENN: You're making fun of --

STU: Whatever the hell he was saying. I don't know. I just feel like it's an embarrassment from beginning to end. I'm sorry, you didn't feel that way. I'm sorry you like President Biden and you will vote for him. That's not how I feel. And I have to express it. As he said, free speech is important.

REPUBLICANS Just Passed a HATE SPEECH Bill Under the Guise of “Antisemitism”

The House of Representatives just passed a bill to combat “antisemitism” with the majority of both parties on board. But there’s one big problem with the bill: It’s not an “antisemitism” bill, Glenn says. It’s a hate speech bill. Glenn explains why, although he’s been accused of defending Jews TOO MUCH, he’s “dead set against” this bill: “The only one who can remove the hate in someone's heart is God. Government can't fix human hearts.” Glenn also explains why constitutionalists must defend the pro-Palestinian protesters’ right to free speech — not violence — no matter how despicable it is.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: The House of Representatives passed a major anti-Semitism bill on Wednesday. Which would crack down on anti-Semitism on college campuses, as protests raged nationwide. So you're now not saying that this is going to be for everybody. This is just through the Department of Education.

Legislation was opposed by 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats. The legislation seeks to make the Department of Education adopt the international Holocaust remembrance alliances. Definition of anti-Semitism, when enforcing the 1964 Civil Rights Act on college campuses. Now, I had to look it up. What is the international Holocaust remembrance alliances definition of anti-Semitism?

Well, they define anti-Semitism as, and I'm quoting. A certain perception of Jews. Which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews.

It also defines it as a heretical and physical manifestation of anti-Semitism, and directed towards your or non-Jewish individuals, and/or their property.

Towards the Jewish community, institutions, and religious facilities.

Examples of anti-Semitism include calling for the harming of the Jewish people, in the name of racial or extremist view of religion. And accusing Jewish people of inventing and/or exaggerating the Holocaust. The combat, anti-Semitism movement hailed the passage as a momentous achievement. And said, works remains to be done to get it through the Senate and President Joe Biden's desk. While we celebrate this milestone. Our work is far from over. We now need to urgently call upon Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to prioritize the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. Okay.

So there are the 20 Republicans in the House, that stood up. Florida representative, Matt Gaetz, opposed the bill. He said, this is a hate speech bill.

Anti-Semitism is wrong. But the legislation is written without regard for the Constitution, common sense, or even common understanding of the meaning of the words. If this bill would pass, the gospel itself would meet the definition of anti-Semitism under the terms of this bill. Democratic lawmakers including hoist minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries has also called for the passage of the bill. The countering anti-terrorism act. Or anti-Semitism act. The bill would combat anti-Semitism through the appointment of a new presidential adviser, that would be charged with implementing the White House's coordinated strategy in dealing with anti-Semitism.

What could possibly go wrong here?

The effort to crush anti-Semitism and hatred in any form, is not a democratic or Republican issue. It's an American issue that must be addressed in a bipartisan manner with a fierce urgency of now! Because after all, gang, say it with me. We've got to do something.

Okay. You know, when I hear people say, the Jews killed Jesus. Or those dirty Jews run the world.

Or those Jews are responsible for everything bad. Or you're just saying things because you have a Zionist master. I think to myself, you're a bloody idiot.

You have no clue, as to what is really happening in the world.

You have no clue. Are there some Jewish people, and top of corporations, or top of whatever?

Yeah. Yeah. There are. Are there very successful Jews that happen to be bankers?

Yeah. But, you know what, there's also very successful bankers that are Catholics and Mormons. And Lutherans, and Methodists. And dare I say it, atheists.

Yeah, but it's the Jews that are the problem.

You're an idiot. You shouldn't run around saying these things. But I kind of actually like it, when you do.

Because I know exactly who you are. Oh. Here's a guy who is so stupid, he can't tie his own shoes. Or he's just a massive racist.

Kids, stay away from him. You shouldn't run around saying, because it's false, it's rude. It's stupid.

All of the above. And we're trying to create a society here. The proper response to this act is to not post memes of long-nosed Jews, wrapping their tentacles around a US flag. It doesn't mean you're right about how the Jews are. Or vindicated for noticing that Zionists are the reason for everything bad, that it's ever happened.

You can say those things. You can say those things. Because our Constitution guarantees it.

You know how I feel about anti-Semitism.

You know how I feel about the Holocaust. And the return of the Holocaust. I've been warning about it.

I've been trying to prepare you for this time. I've prepared my family for this time. Hard choices are going to come soon.

They already are. This one doesn't seem hard. What have I always said?

The Constitution must rule. The Constitution must be our set of principles, that we do not violate. No matter, if it cuts your way or against you.
This -- this act, you would think, that someone like me, that is very supportive of the Jews in Israel, would be all for.

I am dead set against this.

And you should be too. Something can be legally permissible, and morally repulsive at the same time.

Speech needs to be protected. Not the stuff we all agree on. But the stuff we don't agree on.

The only speech that needs protection is the speech that a lot of people, the majority find absolutely abhorrent.

Congress doesn't understand. You cannot legislate hatred away. You can't pass a bill. You know what happens?

All you do is you create speakeasies of hate. They go into the closet. They go into another room, where they can't be heard. And it just becomes a festering pool of hate.

That at some point, will break out.

The only one that can remove hatred from hearts is God. We can do our part.

Does that mean that jerk protesters can prevent Jewish students from entering their classroom. No. That's not speech.

In the public square, and I mean that electronically as well, those who are standing up, and, quite honestly, spreading the lies about the Palestinians in Hamas. And saying, no. They're not.

They're good. They're great. There's not a problem there. As much as it kills me to say it, I stand with them on freedom of speech only.

The people who voted for this bill, I'm sure it was well-intended. But they're misguided by human nature itself.

Governments cannot fix human hearts. They are also -- they should all be sent back to some remedial class on the principles of the Constitution of America.

The importance of freedom of speech. The importance of not rushing in to do something, because it's scary right now.

No!

No. Why is it, this Congress can only pass the things, that seemingly only hurt the strength of America. And on me cut across the Constitution.

You just took away our Fourth Amendment right for warrants.

You just took that away, you're now -- you're now just passed another bill, that is bringing people -- who have escaped Gaza. And are Palestinians. Remember, 97 percent of them, in the latest poll, hate America.

About 70 percent of them, were all for Hamas. In the 80 percentile range of supporting October 7th.

Congress, you just passed a bill, that are bringing those people in. To America!

And settling them here in America. What the hell is wrong with you?

You live in the upside down world, I don't.

I still live in the world where the -- where America is all about protected rights. It's a dark day, when only 20 -- only 20 people in Congress that are Republican will stand up against this bill. It is a dark, dark day!