RADIOFebruary 13, 2023

Democrats’ RADICAL white supremacy bill could end HORRIBLY

In further efforts to curb speech, Democrat Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee recently introduced a new bill (the ‘Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023’) that is one of the ‘most unconstitutional and radical pieces of legislation proposed in I don’t know how many years,’ Glenn says. In this clip, Glenn explains the bill, which aims to prevent and prosecute acts of white supremacy (without really defining what ‘white supremacy’ actually is). Then, Glenn shows how this bill relates to similar moves throughout history that ultimately have NOT ended well…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let's -- let's start here, shall we? College kids now are learning to snitch on each other, through secret tip lines.

This is Germany, West -- I'm sorry. East Germany, under the Soviets. They had the Stasi.

And they would -- they -- they got people to snitch on each other.

That is the one thing that people have always said about America. They'll come over, and they'll say, Americans are so nice.

And they're so trusting. Well, it's not that we were that trusting. It's that Europe wasn't trusting. Nobody trusted each other.

Because for centuries, they've turned each other in, for one reason or another. So keep it to yourself. Keep it to your family. What do they say is if we're open. Because we've never had that kind of thing. So when George Bush first promoted, hey, you see something, say something. Call the White House snitch line if you see something that your neighbor is doing.

No. I mean, if I see my neighbor, and he's, you know, obviously something is wrong.

I'll call the local police.

Hey, can you just check this out?

But I'm not watching my neighbor, and snitching on my neighbor.

And that's what's happening right now. People are -- in college. This door room number, and this dorm room. Had a sign that said all solicitors must be able to define the word woman, and then the campus PC police come. Seventy-nine complaints at the University of Connecticut. There's a bathroom that is being identified based on gender.

Oh, my gosh. No.

Oh. There was some verbal remarks, directed at certain race. And gender identity at this comedian, that was on campus.

Really?

In Illinois, a student was reported for saying that there were only two genders, and reportingly not wanting to live with a roommate, who just makes stuff up in his head. That's no longer acceptable.

Meanwhile, to further curb speech, Sheila Jackson Lee, has introduced the leading against white supremacy act of 2023.

It is one of the most unconstitutional and radical pieces of legislation, proposed in -- I don't know how many years.

The leading against white supremacy act, it aims to prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime, and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime. Blah, blah, blah.

So if you engage in what is described as white supremacy hate, and you inspire a hate crime, well, if it was used in the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of any of the crime, you're responsible.

And you go to prison. But they don't define exactly what white supremacy is. And white supremacy crimes are.

Okay?

Now, seems like a problem. You know, maybe.

Especially when you say, there is no definition in the law of white supremacy ideology.

And then, you know, the conspiracy provision. It's -- it makes it illegal to publish material, that inspires a crime.

So if I publish something and somebody read it, some lunatic, and they were like, oh, my gosh. I've got to take this into my own hands. I'm going to go shoot down that Chinese weather balloon myself. This government would probably say, that was a crime.

And if they were white, and they're like, yeah. And white power!

I could be prosecuted. You could be prosecuted. It doesn't matter if they're mentally ill or not. This is kind of a -- a problem. Kind of a problem, for millions of Americans.

Now, this is all happened before. All of this has happened before. There is nothing new under the sun. The question is: Are we going to learn from history and recognize the -- the problems and recognize the -- did -- what did -- historically, what did people do? Did it work, or did it not work? Did they do something or not do something?

You can't just expect utopia to happen. Because utopia. You know what utopia -- is -- I mean, in a better world, it would be a coloring book. And it would be at best, fiction. The word utopia actually comes from the 16th century. And it was kind of a joke.

Utopia, it came -- you know, it was written by Thomas Moore. And he took the Greek prefix for not or no, and the suffix for place. No place.

That's what -- that's what utopia means. No place, or nowhere. Get it?

So I think the book by Thomas Moore is a prediction of communism. It takes place on a fictional island called Utopia. It's an island of slavery, where poverty is cured by harmony. Crime is solved by equity. Private property, money, been abolished. Social classes have been unmasked, for what they really are.

Conspiracy of the rich.

And utopia, the island nowhere, achieved a complete equality of goods.

Now, equality of goods. What they did was they just destroyed the meaning of all goods.

Because everyone shares in a utopia. And to devalue currency, precious objects are treated like trash.

People give diamonds to children, instead of marbles. They have chamber pots or toilets, made of gold. And even the chains on the slaves are made of gold, and traditional institutions mean nothing.
Euthanasia is common on the island of Utopia.

Because nobody really cares about the value of anything, including human life.

Utopians always claim to be humanist. I just want to do what's best for all humans. And they offer that utopian view. And, again, it is the basis of Marxism and communism. And really, it's just all a lie.

But it's a diversion. It's a delay tactic. Because people don't realize, this is a lie, until usually it's too late.

Because it's a slow boil.

Think of how -- you are accepting things now, that you wouldn't have accepted, 15 years ago. Ten years ago.

Ten years ago, if I said, men could have babies too. Every liberal would have said, not possible.

What are you talking about?

Well, that's what you're going to tell me in about ten years. No, I'm not. That's ridiculous.

You are not parroting and saying things that you know are nonsense.

I'm speaking to America in general.

And people are saying, right now, give me the power, so I can make you powerful.

Yeah. And the choice is always, it's going to be Armageddon.

It's going to be -- he's worse than Hitler.

NASA -- he's worse than Trump. And Trump was worse than Hitler. Oh, wow. And what was Mitt Romney again?

I mean, it's always a choice between utopia, we can't really define it. But we'll know it when we get there.

And we can't tell you how we'll pay for it. But it will all be sugar plumb fairies and lollipops.

It's wonderful.

Or. Go ahead. You can roast in the fires of hell, with Satan and Armageddon. Go ahead.

And they convince us, that the power of a nation should not belong to you. Everything belongs to you.

Everything in your life, all of your thoughts, your actions, they belong to you.

The things you have earned through merit, belong to you. And if you've, quote, earned something without merit, if you've just inherited it, you don't really own it.

You really -- something becomes yours, when you've earned it. But all that goes out the window. The power of a nation doesn't belong to people. It's stuff.

It should all belong to the state. So people, one by one, historically speaking, hand all of their power over to the state.

And then the state decides what people should be. What they can say. What they can watch. What they can listen to.

They define hate. You and I both know hate. We know hate when we see hate. We know love when we see love.

I can tell you the difference between love and sex. There's a big difference.

Love always wins. Sex doesn't always win. Utopians take the state, and turn it into the brain of society.

And it controls everything.

Now, think of this. This is from the 1600s. Think of this.

The state becomes the brain of society. With AI and all of the technology we have today, they are literally trying to be the brain of society.

And control everything and hold all of the power. It will do the thinking and deciding for everyone.

In America, the first utopian, was Woodrow Wilson, really.

The one with real power, he used centralization, and bureaucracy, to make a collectivism that Americans had never seen before.

And then he spread it in all the universities. He convinced Congress, to give, hand them their power, so he could use war and surveillance to make a war safe for democracy. FDR took the step even further.

He said, it would get rid of war altogether, with a little help from Josef Stalin.

I -- we've seen all of these things before, and America turned. Just in time.

Will we this time?

Because there's -- there's one more example, that we should learn from. And it is from China.

But remember, China is the new model, according to all the global leaders. All of the big capitalist leaders.

And all the leaders of the -- the world, including Joe Biden.

China is the new model. Well, let me tell you how they got there.

In a minute. Sponsored by preborn. You know, every once in a while, I get to give you good news. And here's some good news. You know how many babies you have saved?

How many babies have been born, just because of this audience?

It's over, I think 55- or 60,000 babies, in the last 12 months, were saved because of you.

Because somebody, if it wasn't you, somebody, you know, maybe in the car next to you, or the cubicle next to you, somebody was listening to this program. They were like, I'm going to donate 28 bucks. That bought an ultrasound for a woman who had come into a clinic, 55,000 of them, assuming there's no twins.

And they walk in, and they say, I think I'm going to have an abortion.

They saw the ultrasound, that cost 28 bucks. They didn't have to pay for it.

And that made mom go, I'm going to -- that's a baby. I'm going to keep my baby.

That's what you have done. And you can do it, for 28 bucks.

I think it's 140 bucks. And what do you get? Six.

I mean -- you really can save a bunch of baby's lives. Do it once a month, $28.

Be a hero. Dial #250, and say the key word baby.

That's #250.

Key word baby. Or go to preborn.com/Glenn. Find out all the information.

Preborn.com/Glenn.

Go there now. Ten-second station ID.
(music)

GLENN: All right. I want to talk to you about the great cultural revolution here.

Like every group utopian, Mao started with ideas. I got ideas.

Slogans, basically, that sound good. But don't really mean anything. See if any of these sound familiar to you.

Before long, the slogans are true.

This is how he made every aspect of life, political. That way, anyone who disagreed with him, was conspiring against China. The great utopia.

They weren't his opponents. They were the enemies of the people.

This is why utopians always combine academia with the military. The academics dream up the new utopias, and the military forces people into those utopias. And Mao is really clever about this.

He convinced people how they had a role in how things work. Your lives are political for a reason.

This is how he got students to snitch on one another. Then get kids to betray their own parents, all in the names of the state.

This is how you create a whole society of vigilantes. For Woodrow Wilson, he had the four-minutemen.

That was his good news. For Mao. The red guards. Young activists, who served as his unofficial enforcers. In colleges, I just told you what the snitchers were. And they think they are doing good, just like these others did. The tech world, isn't that really the enforcer of the government now?

One of the first utopians. One of the first utopians of the modern age, really was Mao.

He was the most prolific at death. They take power to destroy history. That's the first thing.

They say the world as we know it, China as we know it, has to be replanned. Reset.

Because everything you know is old, dusty, and no longer any good.

At the start of the cultural revolution, the red guard led a campaign to eradicate the four Olds.

I want you to listen. Pesky. Four Olds.

The four Olds. That they had to get rid of.

The old customs.

Christmas means nothing, Thanksgiving is a celebration of slavery, Fourth of July is a celebration. Get rid of the old customs.

The -- the old culture.

You needed new habits, and new ideas.

The old history, had to be swept away.

The old guard had to be swept away.

They started, believe it or not, by tearing down statues, and changing the names of streets.

Then they attacked anyone who tried to stop them. They destroyed people's homes. They publicly humiliated their opponents. And no one could stop them. Because people had already given Mao all their power.

Before long, the Red Guard was destroying cemeteries and factories and libraries and museums and temples. Wow, they were burning down their own cities. What happens is, the same story over and over again. They want to reform the big institutions of society.

But in the end, they only destroy the small institutions. Family, church, private property.

And they always start with the idea, that you have a duty to the state. And the group is more important than the individual. And if that individual is speaking out, they have to be shut down.

That was only the first installment of Mao's genocidal reign.

This AI could change EVERYTHING by next year

With Elon Musk’s announcement of Grok 4, humanity is closer than ever before to creating AGI – artificial general intelligence – which would change everything. Glenn Beck breaks down what’s coming in the next year with AI, which even Elon Musk called “terrifying.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me tell you the biggest story of the day.

And I think it is the biggest story possibly of all mankind, as of today.

It's going to change rapidly.

I don't know if anybody -- did either of you guys watch the Elon Musk thing last night?

STU: No, I did watch a few minutes of it.

GLENN: Okay. Did you, Jason?

JASON: No. I sure didn't.

GLENN: Okay. So the xAI team was there to unveil Grok 4. This is the latest intelligence, and let me be very, very clear.

Last night was not your typical tech launch. This is a moment that demands everyone's full attention.

We are now at the crossroads, where promise and peril are going to collide. Okay?

I have explained to you, for years, AGI.
AI. AGI. And ASI. Narrow intelligence is what we've always had.

General intelligence is the next step. And that is, it's better that man, one -- one, you know, like Grok. Can do everything. That you can do.

Better that you can do.

Okay?

And then there's super intelligence. ASI.

Artificial super intelligence.

That's when things get really, really creepy.

When you hit AGI, the road to ASI could be overnight.

Okay?

We need to understand what's at stake here. Because Grok four brought us closer to that second stage, than ever before.

Grok four is a powerhouse. They demonstrated it last night.

It surpasses the expertise of Ph.D.-level sailors in all fields.

It can get 100 percent on any -- any test for any field, mathematics, physics. Engineering.

You name it.

This is not a search engine.

This is a system that tackles problems, so intricate, they -- they go beyond our existing knowledge base.

Okay?

Let's say there is -- let's say, we have a fusion reactor. And the magnetic containment system goes down. I don't even know what I'm talking about at this point.

But it goes down.

And the top minds all on earth are like, I don't know what to do. Grok 4 can step in, model the physics, design new material, stabilize the system, and avert catastrophe. And it can do it about that fast. Now, this is the capability, that Musk says is just around the corner.

Mark my words. You know, how many -- how many years did I say, between 2027 and 2030, we would start to see this?

STU: Oh, a million times.

That was always --

GLENN: For years. Right? Yeah, always the window.

And everybody, even Ray Kurzweil said, oh, that's way too optimistic. We may be 2050.

And then people started going, 2040, 2030.

Grok shows us 2026 or 2027 is when we're going to hit it. This is the last year, that we have, before things get really weird.

Okay?

Last night, Elon Musk is touting this -- this AI.

And all of the solutions.

And then he says.

Hmm. Probably three times.

Something like this.

And I'm quoting. This is one of them.

It's somewhat unnerving to have created intelligence that's greater than our own.

He then goes on to call it terrifying, twice.

Now, this is a man who has launched rockets, you know, into orbit.

Going to Mars.

And he says, twice!

You know, after he sees the results of it. He says, you know, it's really -- in a way, quite terrifying to see what it's doing.

But we just have to make sure that it remains good!

Oh, okay.

All right. Sure.

Now, the key point in the announcement was the mention of ARC-AGI.

I had never heard of ARC-AGI. I had no idea what it was. But I noticed AGI. And I went, uh-oh. That sounds important. So this is the gold standard. The bench mark testing for artificial general intelligence.

Okay.

As I've said before, AGI. Artificial General Intelligence is a machine that matches all human cognition, across all domains.

Reasoning, creativity.

Problem solving. Not just specialized tasks like playing Go or analyzing x-rays. Everything. For instance, Musk said by mid-next year to the latest end of next year, it will be able to create a full length movie, just from a text prompt.
And do it all at once!

So, in other words, it will say, create a movie, and you just explain the Godfather.

It will do the casting. It will do the writing. It will do the filming, if you will. It will -- score the music, and it will happen that fast.

Almost in realtime. We are nowhere near the computational power now, to do that separately.

But this will do it all at once. It will make a movie with all of it, simultaneously.

So the arc AGI system is the benchmark on how close we are to AGI. Remember, scary things happen at AGI.

Terrifying things happen at ASI. ASI could be a matter of hours, or days after we hit AGI.

Grok 4 scored 16.2 percent on the ARC-AGI scale.

Why is that important? You're like, well, only 16 percent away.

Because last time, it barely broke 8 percent.

And that -- they took that test, last time with Grok three.

And it took us forever to get to 8 percent.

Now, what is it? A year later.

We're at 16 percent. Remember, these things are not linear. The next time, we could be at 32, we might be at 64.

We are on the verge. This is the last year of -- I can't believe I'm saying this. Of normalcy. Okay?

This year is -- we're going to look back at this year, probably two years ago, gosh, remember the good old days, when everything was normal.

And you could understand everything.

This is how close we are!

Everything you and I talked about last night, Stu, about what we're doing in January, make -- put -- does it make it even more critical that that happens like, oh, I don't know.

Right now.

STU: Yeah. For sure.

GLENN: You are going to need to know your values, your ethics, your rights.

You are going to need to know absolutely everything.

Now, Grok 4 is not true AGI yet.

It lacks the full autonomy and the generalized reasoning of a human mind. But it is the closest that we've come.

It's a system that can adapt, innovate, at a level that outpaces specialized AIs by a wide margin.

This is a milestone. This is not a destination, but it's something that should jolt everybody awake. So here's what's coming over the next six months. By December 2025, that's this Christmas!

December 2025, he believes, Musk, that Grok 4, will drive breakthroughs in material sciences.

So, in other words, imagine a new -- brand-new alloy, that is lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel.

And it revolutionizes aerospace and everything else, or a drug that halts Alzheimer's progression, tailored to a person's DNA.

Grok will drive breakthroughs through material science. So brand-new materials that nobody has ever thought of.

Pharmaceuticals that we never thought could be made.

And chemical engineering, putting together chemicals that no man has ever thought.

That's going for happen by December.

Imagine a chemical compound that makes carbon capture, economically viable. The climate change stuff, that's over.

It will be over.

Because this will solve that! These are not fantasies.

This is Grok 4.

Musk said something that he never thought. He believes that within the next year, by 2027, Grok 4 will uncover new physical laws.

So that will rewrite the understanding -- our understanding of the entire universe.

That there will come -- like there's gravity. Hey, you know what, there's another law here that you never thought of. Wait. What?

That, he says, will come by 2027. This is going to accelerate human discovery, at an unprecedented scale.

I told you, at some point. I said, by 2030. It might be a little earlier than that.

Things will be happening at such a fast rate, you won't be able to keep up with them.

And it will accelerate to the point to where you won't even understand what all of this means.

Or what the ramifications are!

Are you there yet?

In six months, Grok 4 could evolve into a system, that dwarfs human expertise in economics, defense, all of it.

Now, again, it's a bit terrifying to quote Elon Musk. Why?

Because we don't know, what else comes with this.

This is like an alien life form.

We have no idea, what to predict. What it will be capable of.

How it will view us, when we are ants, to its intellect.

Okay?

It is a tool, but it is also Pandora's box.

If Grok 4 is the biggest step towards AGI.

And maybe one of the last steps to AGI.

My feeling is: What I've been saying forever.

2027 to 2030, I'm leaning more toward the 2027 now.

Because of this announcement last night.

We are on the verge of AGI.

And everything in human existence changing overnight.

And as Musk said himself, two times, it's terrifying!

We should act like it is terrifying.

Or risk losing the control of the future, that we're all trying to build. That's the biggest story of the day.

I think! In my opinion.

Bill O'Reilly reveals how Trump can END Epstein files nightmare overnight!

Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck with his plan for how the Trump administration can fix the Epstein Files fallout "overnight." Plus, he explains why he believes there's only one way that former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan get indicted by a grand jury.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. Bill O'Reilly.

Welcome to the program, sir! How are you?

BILL: Welcome. (inaudible)

And right off the bat, I have to correct you.

GLENN: Yeah. You're not alive. What know.

BILL: I mean, you know -- you don't know that?

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. No. I -- I thought you were dead. Anyway --

BILL: You were dead to me, oh!
(laughter)
I --

GLENN: I get it.

BILL: That's just another brick in your wall, Beck.
(laughter)

GLENN: It's good to talk to you, Bill.

Tell me -- you had a conversation with -- with President Trump, what, a couple of months ago, and I talked about --

BILL: Yeah. St. Patrick's Day, he invited me to sit on a cabinet meeting, which he does sometimes.

And he said, look, we've got files, Kennedy, King, Epstein -- what do you think? And I said, well, first Kennedy you've got to put out pretty much everything, which he did. King, he didn't. I don't know why. Because that's important too.

And then on Epstein I said, you have to be careful here, because this is now being used in political precincts. Both sides want to destroy anybody that was associated with Epstein. And the problem is that a federal investigation. They don't make a determination whether you had a -- what kind of relationship you had with Epstein. They just said, so-and-so had lunch with him.

Or maybe so-and-so had -- saw him at a party. And I said, any name of a human being associated with Epstein, in any way, that person is going to be destroyed. Because you know, the press is not going to put anything into context.

So I said, but it's very important that the Justice Department tell the folks what they know.

And you don't have to get specific with anything.

But you have to say, this is the information that we've compiled. And that's not hard.

And I don't know why the Trump administration is not doing that.

GLENN: Wow!

So, first of all, it's your fault, that we're not getting any names. We learned a lot here.

BILL: Probably my fault, but the president --

GLENN: You know what, I think you're right. I don't want all the names of the people. I want to know --

BILL: And I don't either.

GLENN: Right! I want to know the Justice Department has sorted through the things, and then have gone through. And said, this is criminal. This is not. These people are being indicted, et cetera, et cetera. But to come out and say, there is nothing there, I mean, it's -- it's at least --

BILL: It's ridiculous.

GLENN: It's mass incompetence, at least from Pam Bondi. How could she come out and say, it's all sitting on my desk?

And then when she doesn't release it, she says, well, that's because the FBI in New York is thwarting this process. There are people up there, that are trying to keep this from me.

And then she makes no arrests on that. We never hear about that again.

And then now all of a sudden, there's nothing to see.

BILL: Well, listen, Pam Bondi does not make decisions on her own.

No cabinet member does.

All the decisions come out of the West Wing.

So what I believed happened was, Trump was so obsessed with the big bill, with Iran, with Putin, with China.

That this -- they didn't even think about this. Okay?

GLENN: I believe that.

BILL: And it slowly began to unravel. And then I caught it by surprise.

But this is the easiest fix. Somewhere so easy.

BILL: So if I'm in charge, and that would be a great thing for everyone, except you, Beck -- but every other American, if I were in charge, tremendous. You would be in Botswana. Right.

GLENN: Right. Oh, I know.

Yeah. Yeah. I would be the ambassador of the white farmers in -- in South Africa if it were up to you. I know. I know.

BILL: No. You would be wandering around going, I am Glenn Beck. And they would go, who? That's what you'd be doing.

GLENN: That's every day.

BILL: So this could happen within the hour. Pam Bondi announces a press conference for tomorrow.

At that press conference, sitting next to her, is Merrick Garland, everyone.

You had this stuff for four years! Now, I understand that Mr. Garland has gone native and is living in a -- well, we can find him. We can pull him out of there, and have him and Pam, sit there and answer questions in a general way about what evidence the Justice Department of the United States has compiled.

GLENN: Not going to happen.

BILL: That's it!

Well, if it's not going to happen, then President Trump is going to take a hit.

But he's calculating that this will say that it's that night important.

But I don't know why you would not do it.

I just don't know. And I'm usually pretty good at predicting what the president does or does not do.

GLENN: So here's the thing, Bill.

I think he keeps focusing on Epstein. It's not that big of a deal.

It's not about Epstein. It's about justice.

It's about, can we trust the people -- correct!

It's all about credibility and justice.

And he's not seeing that. And I don't know how he's missing that. Because I agree with you.

He's been so busy on so many other things.

BILL: That's right. That's right.

GLENN: This is not at the top of his priority list.

But he did campaign on it.

BILL: Right.

And I don't know if there's anybody inside the White House.

He looks to be annoyed, when this subject comes up.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: And here's the -- what works -- you have to understand.

A guy like Donald Trump runs it all.

If he's annoyed, nobody will want to annoy him more. Okay?

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: That's how it works. The older arch is, because Epstein got favorable treatment.

By the feds, in the first go around in Florida, that there's a deep suspicion about this case.

But if you break it down, if the Biden administration had any dirt on any Republican associated with Epstein. It would have been out.

And vice-versa.

If the Republicans had any dirt on any Democrats. Now, we know that former president Clinton, was involved with Epstein to some extent.

I don't know if that was a factor, okay? I don't know.

But your right for once. You're right. It's about credibility. It's about the American people trusting that we do have equal justice for all!

So what do you -- what do you make of now the Russia gate thing, coming out, today. Or yesterday.

The FISA court.

The fact that they're now saying, hey.

You know, we need to hold Brennan accountable.

We're like five or six days away.

Weeks away from him, you know, slipping past the -- the statute of limitations.

I mean, all these things are out today.

There's that. There is also the -- let's see here.

The Secret Service -- I think this happened a year ago.

But it's being reported as if it's news.

Secret Service suspends six agents assigned to protect Trump during a Butler assassination attempt. I mean, all these things are coming out. Like, look, we're busy on all these things. And I do believe they're busy on these things.

But it's like the Keystone Cops are in charge of the PR on this. It's bad.

BILL: Well, there's a lot of politics involved in both of those cases. Number one, in order to get Comey and Brennan to get indicted by a grand jury. Federal grand jury, and that's the only passage, you would have to have a whistle-blower, saying, yeah, these guys abused their power. I worked for them. And they absolutely wanted to get Trump.

And they knew the Russia dossier was phony.

And they did it anyway.

If I have that Justice Department.

Then you can get those guys.

If you don't have it, they will not be even indicted by a grand jury.

GLENN: So how is it that we do not have that Justice Department?

How do we not have that Justice Department?

BILL: Well, look. I don't know whether they have a whistle-blower or not, okay?

And if they have a whistle-blower, I want the case to go forward.

I want those two men indicted.

You can't do that, at that level.

As far as the Secret Service is concerned, monumental screw up. Everybody knows it. They fired the morons in charge of it. That woman -- I was embarrassed listening to her, trying to explain.

They didn't know what the deuce was going on. But this was across-the-board, in the Biden administration.

You know, it was a year ago Sunday, this upcoming Sunday.

GLENN: Right.

BILL: And it's just another example of how the Biden administration was the second worst administration in the history of this country. People have no idea how bad it was.

Every single agency was chaotic. Nothing worked. And this is just part of that. And we'll have a slew of stuff on Sunday. Nothing really meaningful.

I mean, they suspended the Secret Service agents, as they should have. They fired the director as they should have. The guy was a nut.

I don't know if there was anything more to that. I doubt it.

I'm more interested in the guy in the bushes. Because they don't know anything about him. I would like to know a little bit about him.

But again, the federal government, it doesn't really matter. It's the government. They never want to tell us stuff, Beck, never.

We always have to pull it out of them. It's almost like Russia or something. Come on!

GLENN: Right. Yeah. Let me ask you, let me take you back again to the Epstein thing.

I noticed yesterday, there were these people who were on the left. Who were taking tweets of mine. That say, look. These things don't make sense. On the Epstein thing. And they just have to be answered. And not anti-Trump at all.

And yet, the anti-Trump people were retweeting that, and they're trying to -- they're trying to get the right to fight against itself again and split people away from Donald Trump, where I don't think this Epstein thing is -- is splitting people from Donald Trump, at least at this point.

And I -- you know, I -- my wife stopped me from answering some of those tweets, yesterday.

Because it's never good, when you -- when I tweet in anger. Which I did.

But -- or was going to. What did you think about how this is being used against the right to try to separate us even more?

BILL: Everything is political. Everybody knows that for you.

But the MAGA people, from the mail I get. And I get a voluminous amount of mail. They're not happy.

GLENN: Oh, I agree. I'm not happy.

BILL: Now, are they going to throw President Trump under the cliché-ridden bus? No. Because to them, the greater good is being served by a fair tax bill.

Trying to cut waste.

Dealing with Iran effectively. And hopefully dealing with Putin.

That's another thing, that's on Trump's plate.

He has to deal with Putin now.

Has to. And that will be the next big story.

GLENN: How is he going to deal with it?

BILL: Lavrov and Rubio, are in Indonesia, as we speak.

And I assume that Rubio is delivering a message. That you either stop, or we're going to just absolutely crush you economically. Which the United States can do. By saying. No bank does business with Moscow.

And if you do business, no matter what bank you are, we're going to put you out of business.

Okay?

GLENN: Yeah. I've only got a couple of seconds. But didn't we already do that under Biden?

BILL: No! We didn't do the banks. We did the sanctions. And the sanctions they can always get around, because China is going to buy as much oil from Russia as possible.

You stop the banks, from doing all business with Moscow? Who is going --

GLENN: Isn't that what the SWIFT thing was all about?

When we kicked them off of SWIFT, wasn't that what that was all about?

BILL: No! Because they can still do a huge business with countries buying their oil.

And they got to pay Putin and Russia for the oil, and that has to go through the banking system.

If you stop the banking system, he can't get paid.

GLENN: Hmm, it's amazing. I'm glad I'm not the president right now. I think he's made some very brave decisions, and he is walking a tightrope. I mean, the world is on edge. And I pray for --

BILL: He looks very tired to me. Very tired. I haven't talked to him in a while, which is unusual. But you're right. You're absolutely right. That's the second time you've been right in this conversation. My God!

GLENN: I know. It's crazy.

BILL: What in the world.

GLENN: I was wrong about you being dead.

BILL: What is happening?

GLENN: It's good -- it's good to talk to you, my friend. Is everything okay? Is everything going well?

BILL: Everything is all right, Beck. We are not only successful, but that's old news. We've been that way for 50 years, but I appreciate you having me on your fine program.

GLENN: Okay. I love you.

BILL: Stu is still breathing.

GLENN: Hmm.

BILL: So that's good. Right.

But I've got a big book called Confronting Evil. Of course, we sent it, and of course you denied getting it. That comes out September 9th, so put me on a dance card.

GLENN: Well, we'll have you on. And you can also find Bill and his YouTube page. YouTube.com/BillOReilly. Or is it The Walking Dead?
(laughter)
He's not even laughing. Maybe he hung up. Bill O'Reilly, great to have him on.

FLASHBACK: Kash Patel says FBI Director has Epstein's "Black Book!"

During a 2023 interview with Glenn Beck, now-FBI Director Kash Patel adamantly proclaims that the FBI and specifically the FBI Director is in direct control of Jeffrey Epstein's "Black Book" of clients. So now given the most recent claims by Patel and DOJ Attorney General Pam Bondi, what has changed from his perspective since taking this role? What do YOU think is the explanation for this change in tune by Kash Patel?

Watch Glenn Beck's Extended Interview with Kash Patel from 2023 HERE

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Are Epstein's "Blackmail Videos" Being Used for Leverage RIGHT NOW?

What was Jeffrey Epstein's operation all about. If he was at the center of a massive blackmail operation to compromise those in positions of power, who is in possession of that information now? Glenn Beck and ATF Whistleblower John Dodson analyze the details of this situation and give their thoughts on what is the most likely reality surrounding Epstein.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with ATF Whistleblower John Dodson HERE