RADIOJanuary 13, 2023

Former LGBT activist now helps parents DE-PROGRAM their kids

K. Yang, also known as ‘The Deprogrammer,’ tells Glenn that those best equipped to help others escape cults are the ones who lived inside them themselves. While in her early 20’s, K. Yang worked for an LGBT nonprofit center funded by the New York State Department of Health. ‘We were indoctrinating public school children with gender identity and transgender ideology,’ she says. So now, with immense inside knowledge, Yang knows exactly how to help parents ‘de-program’ their children who may have become ‘brainwashed’ by online, educational, or social media sources that are teaching them lies. And with family members who escaped China and Mao’s Cultural Revolution, Yang knows just how vital it is to equip children with the ability to think for THEMSELVES. *To watch Glenn’s full, 45-minute interview with K. Yang, check out today’s full radio episode on BlazeTV.com or the full radio podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I am thrilled to have Kay Yang on with us. She is a deprogrammer, which I too did not know even exists. She is the creator of stopfemaleerasure.com. She is truly amazing.

She exposes the intersections of corporate government nonprofit collusion, driving the transgender rights movement. She says, a smokes screen for massive social engineering and propaganda war, being used to facilitate female erasure in language, in law, and on a worldwide scale. Her work connects the dots between normalized practices of child sexualization, and proliferation of Biopharmaceutical Transhumanist Technologies. I am going to love this woman. And frames these agendas as foundational to the colonization of the female body and the female reproductive control.

Kay, welcome to the program.

KAY: Wow. Thank you so much, Glenn, for having me here. And for this opportunity. Good morning.

GLENN: Good morning.

I'm so glad to have you on. Let me make sure I have your background right. Ten years ago, when none of us were talking about this stuff. You were working at an LGBTQ center?

KAY: That's right. I was. In my early 20s, is when I was working at an LGBT center. It was a small, local nonprofit. And the funding was coming from the New York State Department of health. So that's a really important part of this as well.

That the state was funding me to do the work that I was doing. We were indoctrinating public schoolchildren with gender identity and transgender ideology.

So we were actually being armed with rainbow-colored propaganda, that was sent to us, from these large nonprofits like Listen and GLAAD, and we would go into the schools. Disarm the teachers, really with these themes around acceptance. Anti-bullying. Suicide prevention. Then we would introduce children to the concept of gender identity, and transgender.

And we would use propaganda tools like the genderbread person, which you may have seen before. But your audience may not all be familiar with. It's a cartoon cookie contact. And it teaches children to measure themselves and others by so-called woman-ness, or man-ness, or femaleness, or maleness.

So we would take tools like this, into the schools with us. We would visit our local area high schools. And set up LGBTQ clubs. And gain straight alliances.

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

You got into the schools. And the teachers were disarmed, assuming they had a problem. They were disarmed, because you were coming in, under the umbrella of the New York State division of family and children counseling, right? So you were coming in with state approval.

KAY: That's right.

And we were in there kind of under the idea of sexual health and agitation. Even though, we were not experts. I have never been trained in sexual health. But I was considered an expert. The moment that I took the job. I was considered an expert, to the teacher.

And we were talking to these students, without the knowledge -- without their parent's consent. You know. Parents didn't know we were having these after school clubs. They didn't know we were talking about sex. Talking about sexuality, trans identity, and gender identity with these students.

There was no knowledge or consent from parents. And this was all considered okay.

GLENN: Okay. All right. So --

KAY: And this is ten years ago.

GLENN: -- this is you, ten years ago. What brought you from that, to someone helping parents deprogram their children. What changed in you?

What was the moment where you were like, oh, crap, I'm on the wrong side?

KAY: Well, a lot of things. A lot of things. As soon as, I saw this concept of a trans child, this was really concerning to me.

Because at the time, when I was working at the LGBT center, I had no idea that the work we were doing, was really paving the way for the manufacturing of the so-called trans child. And also for people to accept this idea. Right?

Or that there would be medicalization or sterilization of healthy children and their bodies.

GLENN: Right.

KAY: None of this was ever part of the work that we were doing. It never crossed my mind, that this would be a thing. So, yeah. Ten years ago, no one had heard of a trans child. But in 2019, the CDC did a survey. And it was claimed that one out of every 50 high school students in America, was identified as trans. So that's a huge increase.

GLENN: Yes.

KAY: Yeah.

And a lot of the reporting news media has attributed that -- the increase to children feeling safe to come out. And to them having better data collection. But it's never attributed to this widespread social engineering, that was going on.

And as soon as I heard this concept of a trans child. This was extremely alarming to me.

Because if you went back in time and told me that what we were doing, at the LGBT center was -- like, in the near future, where three, four, five, 6-year-old children are being paraded in front of international media, openly sexualized and groomed, you know, these kids. Drag queen story time. I would have never believed this.

And really, there's no such thing as a trans child. And this becomes really obvious. When you look back, only one decade to a time when no one had heard of a trans child. It's corporate fiction. It's propaganda. And no child is born in the wrong body. No person. Whether an adult or a child, can change their sex.

It doesn't really matter. You know, anything you can do, you can put on makeup. You can change your clothes. You know, you can do drug yourself with chemicals, and wrong sex hormones.

Or have these really invasive medically unnecessary procedures. But it's never going to change the fact that a boy is a boy, and a girl is a girl.

So we have to stop lying to children. And when I saw that this -- this so-called movement. It's not a real movement.

But when I saw this turn towards the focus of children. And telling children, they could be born in the wrong body. And moving them on a path towards medicalization, this really shocked me. And scared me.

GLENN: So because you're into the trans humanist movement and everything, we will talk about a little bit later.

I just want to make sure we're on the same page. I believe that we are living in a time, where a lot of people are useful idiots. And a lot of -- a lot of the people that -- that believe, you know, in -- you know, the stuff that you were teaching. A lot of them might be really well-intentioned. And believe that, you know, this is really something, you know, whatever.

But there is -- you know, I said last hour, I don't know why liberals won't wake up. Because liberals were right. Conservatives were wrong.

The liberals were the ones saying, the United States government is just colluding with corporations. And eventually, they're -- it's going to be one giant corporation.

I think the collusion between the government, and, you know, in this case, pharmaceutical companies or whatever. That collusion is what's really, truly driving all of this stuff. And they are using these organizations. And these organizations will be chewed up in the end, the minute they stop becoming shill for the -- the system.

Government and business. Do you agree with that?

KAY: Yeah. I mean, in terms of people, of there being a lot of useful idiots. Because I was one of those useful idiots, you know.

I was thinking that what I was doing, was a good thing. It was the right thing. I thought my beliefs were correct. And they were morally superior.

I -- and now I know, that I was wrong. And part of how I know I was wrong. Is because I really started investigating the money behind what was pushing this movement.

GLENN: And where --

KAY: And, you know, I have to --

GLENN: Where does that lead?

KAY: Well, you know, there's a lot of collusion about to go. Because when I worked at the LGBT nonprofit, I didn't really think of it at the time. It was later in my life, when I started investigating others, from social movements.

GLENN: Right.

KAY: That I realized that I could take this analysis, and apply it to the work that I was doing at the LGBT nonprofit.

So then I started to realize, like wait a second. I was being paid. Finding our states to go into public schools, to indoctrinate them, with material that was coming from large nonprofit organizations like Listen and GLAAD.

And those organizations are partnering with the government, and with foundations. And the private sector.

And all of this is being done to push this propaganda, and target our children. And the public school system.

GLENN: And you say, this is to erase the female.

KAY: Well, yes. That is really foundational to this entire thing.

First and foremost, they want to disrupt our sense of selves, and erase the division between the sexes.

Because human beings are a sexually dysmorphic species.

There's males, and there's females.

And everybody who does not fall into male or female, well, they actually still do.

They have hormonal differences or chromosomal differences, but they still fall into one of the two. We're dimorphous.

But this is being erased, and our reality right now. And children are being taught that sex is a spectrum.

Even the World Health Organization. And, you know, they're part of the United Nations. The World Health Organization, recently said that they're going to be expanding their definition of sex.

And that they want to extend it to include people with trans and gender diverse identities.
(laughter)

GLENN: Okay. So I want to ask you -- I'm going to take a one-minute break, and then I will come back. And I want to ask you, what is their motivation for this?

And then I want to get into your background of China and the Red Guard and the revolution that happened there, is a lot like it is here.

And then we'll talk about deprogramming our kids coming up in just a second.

Whether your dog is some giant beast, that can easily be mistaken for a wolf, or one of those little puffballs that you carry around in a purse, you want them to be happy. You want to be healthy. Uno is healthy and happy.

That is my almost 13-year-old. Or almost 13-year-old German Shepherd. That is wicked old.

And he does not -- well, except for all the white on his face, he does not seem like an old dog. The vet just gave him a clean bill of health.

Said, his blood work and everything. They ran up everything, and they said, he's like a puppy.

And he is!

And I think that's because of Ruff Greens. Because I saw, when I started putting Ruff Greens on his food, Tania and the family and I, we saw a dramatic difference in his activity level, in his health, in his eyes. The way he would go run the fence line. He hadn't done that for years.

Ruff Greens gave him all of that back. RuffGreens.com/Beck. They'll give you a first bag free. Just to make sure your dog will eat it. And likes it, as much as Uno does. All you do is pay for shipping. Go to RuffGreens.com/Beck. RuffGreens.com/Beck. Or call 833-G-L-E-N-N-33.

Ten-second station ID.
(music)
Okay. So we're talking to Kay Yang. She is a deprogrammer, and you can find her website, stopfemaleerasure.com.

So, Kay, the only thing that really makes sense to me, is that this is a Malthusian/Marxist kind of movement, that is really anti-human at its core. It's evil. They're breaking up the family and everything else.

Why do you think -- what is the motivation for these people to do this to our children?

KAY: Yeah. Thank you. So right before the break, I was talking about this dissecting of our bodies going on. They're breaking down the boundaries, the two sections. And when there is a, quote, unquote, movement that is sterilizing children, and dissecting our reality, in the name of gender identity. This is genocide. This is a usurping of -- what they're really trying to do is usurp female reproductive controls. And we're facing the attempt takeover of the ownership of the human body, of human biology. But really the focus is on the human body, and the woman's womb, and all of these miraculous, unique bits, and moving pieces and parts of the female body, that make pregnancy and birth possible.

So this is really about controlling reproduction. And birth on this planet. And we're moving into -- or we're already in the fourth Industrial Revolution. Klaus Schwab has this whole book about it. And the fourth industrial revolution really demands the erasure of the rights of the realities of females.

And this is under the guise of LGBT inclusion.

Now, at the same time, they are erasing us in language and in law. They're simultaneously exploiting the very nature of female reproductive biology.

And this is happening through the implementation of new technologies. Like external wounds.

You know, for example, they already have -- in Philadelphia, at the children's hospital, of Philadelphia, they already were growing and plastic --

GLENN: In bags. I know.

KAY: Right.

And now they're in the process of getting FDA approval for a bio bag device to grow human babies in.

GLENN: I -- I mean, I don't know how we -- how I didn't know about you, Kay, in advance. You are so spot-on. And the fact that you were ten years ago, were on the opposite side.

What Klaus Schwab and the WEF are doing, the World Economic Forum, the Great Reset is so anti-human. And it is about population control.

Almost everything they're doing is about population control. So you are now in a place where, tell me your experience with China. And what you're seeing, the parallels, from China.

KAY: Yes. Well, I just want to be clear. Because I think there was a little bit of miscommunication. I'm not from China. I was born in New York City. It's my mother's family that's from China. And they were forced to flee China during the cultural revolution.

GLENN: Good. Well, they saw it and left.

KAY: Yeah. And actually, I want to talk about that a little bit, in terms of the intergenerational communication. There's this whole culture of shame and silence for survivors, and it's really led to a complete loss of communication between the generations, like the narrative is just not there.

And this is a really well-known and documented cultural stigma. Where people who have lived through it. The older generations, who are really dying out right now, they don't talk about it.

And it's customary, you're not supposed to ask any questions. I remember, when I was a child, and I wanted to know about my family's history, and I would innocently ask questions. Just out of curiosity. And I was told not to ask or say anything. Because it's bringing up something painful. And that created a blanket of silence and shame. And really confusion over the whole thing.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.